Thursday, November 29, 2018

Paleo diet?

Going Paleo

Which food fads are harmful and which are healthy? We asked the experts to assess four of the most popular.

Every new diet regimen promises something fabulous — you’ll be thinner, faster, smarter! Before you know it, you’re on a grapefruit-only meal plan or eating flax seeds six times a day. Since the latest food fads are so often served with a hefty side of hype, it’s hard to know what to believe. We asked the experts to help us separate gimmick from good-for-you.
Anju's marinated-rib-eye steak.Photo, Angus Fergusson.
Anju’s marinated-rib-eye steak.Photo, Angus Fergusson.

Paleo diet

This lifestyle plan promotes eating hunter gatherer–style like our caveman ancestors. It’s all about choosing foods that were abundant back when there wasn’t a supermarket in sight: meat, fish, seafood, eggs, veggies and fruit. It also means cutting out processed foods, salt, sugar and dairy, as well as any legumes and grains that weren’t around back in the day (like pasta and chickpeas). The Paleo philosophy is that our bodies are genetically programmed to thrive on a primitive diet and aren’t equipped to deal with modern-day, over-processed foods.



The pitch: You’ll lose weight, reduce your risk of diabetes and heart disease, have clearer skin and boost your libido.
Pros: “What I appreciate most about the Paleo plan is that it requires people to eat unprocessed food,” says Desiree Nielsen, a registered dietitian in Vancouver and the author of UnJunk Your Diet. In the absence of sugary and refined foods, which contribute to health issues like obesity and diabetes, you eat far more nutrient-dense veggies and fruit — the stuff that helps keep you well. “Most of us are overfed and undernourished. When you shift the bulk of your diet to fresh produce, you fix that,” she says.
Cons: There’s a risk that strict followers will eat too much meat. “That’s a problem because high intakes of red meat are linked to a greater risk of colorectal cancers,” says Leslie Beck, a Toronto-based registered dietitian and the author of The Plant-Based Power Diet. Many nutrition gurus also don’t love that nutrient- and fibre-rich grains and legumes are banished. “Carbohydrates are the fuel our bodies and brains need,” says Toronto-based holistic nutritionist Julie Daniluk. “Seed grains, like quinoa, are part of a healthy diet.”
The verdict: If you’re healthy — and curious about eating like the Flintstones — there’s no harm in trying. “But for the longer term, I would suggest a modified, more balanced plan,” Nielsen says. “If you decide not to include grains, at least add legumes to ensure your diet has the fibre and high-quality carbohydrates you need for energy.” Legumes are also rich in protein, B vitamins and disease-fighting phytochemicals.
bread
Photo, Stefan Kirchner/Getty Images.

Gluten-free diet

Poor gluten. A few years ago, most people had no idea the protein existed — now there’s a Canadian expo dedicated to eliminating it from our diets. The reason? Gluten, the protein found in wheat, rye, barley, Kamut and spelt, is the culprit behind the headaches, fatigue, anemia, bone pain and digestive distress (bloating, cramping and diarrhea) in people with celiac disease and gluten intolerance. The only way to manage these symptoms is to remove gluten from your diet.
The pitch: It could be the best way to banish bloating for those with an intolerance, as well as relieve symptoms of celiac disease.
Pros: If you have a sensitivity, simply cutting out gluten can relieve your symptoms. You may also lose some weight on a gluten-free plan.
Cons: Some people end up eating too much gluten-free processed food because it’s more convenient. “Gluten-free diets tend to be low in fibre,” says Beck. “A lot of gluten-free products, like cookies or rice crackers, are made with refined white flour and they can also have a little more sodium in them.” The solution is to focus on eating more whole foods and passing on processed ones.
The verdict: The only reason to go gluten-free is if you have a sensitivity or celiac disease. “It’s true that gluten is inflammatory for a large part of the population,” says Daniluk. “More than 90 percent of people who are celiac don’t realize it.” If you’re concerned, ask your doctor to test for the disease. You can identify an intolerance yourself by avoiding gluten for a month or two, then adding it back to your diet to see how your body responds.
Photo by Alanna Glassman
Photo by Alanna Glassman

DNA diet

Scientists have discovered variations in the way people’s genes react to food, drinks and supplements. A spit test can reveal whether you’re more prone to some nutrition-related diseases (including diabetes and obesity). The results will suggest what you require more or less of in your diet. (For example, if you have a certain genetic variant, you may need extra omega-3s to lower your cholesterol level.) The test looks at gene responses to vitamin C, folate, whole grains, omega-3 fatty acids, saturated fat, sodium and caffeine.
The pitch: You could fend off nutrition-related illnesses with a diet tailored to your chromosomes.
Pros: “This really is a growing field,” Beck says. “We’re discovering that genes may determine some of our unique nutritional needs.” Having a personalized diet plan can be a “powerful motivator to help you stick to healthy lifestyle changes,” adds Nielsen.
Cons: DNA testing for nutrition is still in its infancy. “Knowing your results may not be a crystal-clear road map to better health,” says Nielsen. “For example, if you make changes based on these recommendations, do you have a 100 percent lower chance of heart disease, or is it 10 percent? We’re not quite sure yet.”
The verdict: You have nothing to lose (except a little spit) by taking a test. Just keep your expectations in check: The diet isn’t going to be a cure-all. “Still, someday we may be able to make diet recommendations based on genetic makeup,” says Beck.
nearly empty plate
Photo, Peter Dazeley/Getty Images.

The fast diet

This popular plan promotes intermittent fasting. For two non-consecutive days a week, you graze on only about 500 calories a day, split between breakfast and dinner. The rest of the week you can eat whatever you want — wine, chocolate, fries, you name it — with no restrictions or calorie counting.
The pitch: Intermittent fasting supposedly helps you shed weight steadily — you may lose about 10 pounds in 10 weeks .
Pros: “Not having to restrict your eating most of the week could reduce your sense of deprivation,” says Nielsen. (Very strict diets often lead to unhealthy rebounds.) Plus, the plan won’t interfere with your social life, since you can eat, drink and be merry most days of the week.
Cons: On fast days, you’re likely to feel tired, sluggish and irritable, have strong hunger pangs and cravings and be less efficient, Nielsen says. That’s because of low blood sugar. And while the plan teaches you how to fast, it doesn’t provide guidance on how to eat healthily every day.
The verdict: You might drop a few pounds at first but, as with most fad diets, the weight will likely creep back. “Intermittent fasting is being sold on the premise that you can eat whatever you want and fast away the e ffects,” Nielsen says. “That is a surefire road to long-term weight gain and health issues and it’s unlikely you can keep up the diet. You also don’t establish a nourishing, nutrient-dense way of eating to foster better health — and lifelong weight management.” Fasting is definitely not recommended for children, teens, pregnant or nursing women or for those on blood-sugar medications or with a history of disordered eating.
This article was originally published in Canadian Health & Lifestyle.
 

A group of Female physicians recommend LCHF

A Group Of Doctors Has Embraced The Low-Carb, High-Fat Diet. But Is It Just Another Fad?

These female physicians recommend LCHF eating as a ‘lifestyle,’ yet no studies have confirmed that it’s effective in the long term. Is it just another sign that diet culture is alive and well?

Miriam Berchuk is on a diet.
She doesn’t call it a diet; instead, the Calgary anesthesiologist calls her way of eating a “food lifestyle.” Berchuk avoids breads, pastas and almost all fruits, and she’s lost 25 pounds in 19 months eating this way, often using recipes from a website called Diet Doctor.
Her diet-cum-lifestyle, known as low-carb, high-fat (LCHF) eating, is one of the most talked-about trends in weight loss right now. One of the reasons why it’s easy to reframe as a “lifestyle” is that, in a lot of ways, it’s the opposite of what we’ve always thought of as “dieting” to lose weight.

Here’s a taste of what Berchuk might eat in a day: To start, she skips breakfast. She’ll drink a coffee sometime in the morning, with a squirt of heavy cream. Lunch might be gourmet pepperoni sticks from a Canmore meat shop, with some cheese and veggies. A typical dinner might include an appetizer of cured meat, a salad with avocado and pomegranate seeds and a crustless quiche made with sweet potatoes and heaps upon heaps of Gruyère and havarti cheeses. She doesn’t count calories.
Lindy West on how to be a vibrant, happy fat womanLindy West on how to be a vibrant, happy fat woman
Berchuk believes that our widespread fear of fat over the past half-century, enshrined in national food guidelines and hawked by sellers of every processed food imaginable (low-fat bacon, fat-free cookies), is adding to our waistlines and causing an epidemic of diabetes. Her theory? When we eat more natural and whole-sourced fats, we feel more satiated and stop turning to empty filler foods that offer zilch in nutrients.
“When you give people permission to eat fat as part of a low-carb diet, they feel satisfied,” says Berchuk. “They enjoy what they’re eating and feel like they can do this forever.”
Berchuk is part of a group of Canadian physicians who have adopted, and become advocates for, a lower-carb, higher-fat, whole-food style of diet, believing this way of eating could help reduce our country’s obesity crisis.
The group got its legs in 2016 when four female doctors — none of whom are specialists in obesity medicine or nutrition — launched a closed Facebook group dedicated to this style of eating. They had all used an LCHF approach to managing weight and metabolic issues but found little support among their colleagues. The foursome first connected while talking about their weight loss on a site for physician mothers, then moved to a place of their own — they had plenty to say and not everyone was interested in talking about a low-carb diet.
Nearly two years later, membership to their closed Facebook group has grown to more than 3,000 female doctors — a stat that suggests one in every 12 female physicians in Canada is a member. They trade recipes, share weight-loss success stories, discuss studies on LCHF eating (one extreme of which is known as the ketogenic diet) and vent about the ubiquity of sugary, processed foods in schools and hospitals.
Not all of the group’s members are LCHF advocates, followers or even active members. Some members question LCHF science and raise concerns about weight regain on the diet. Even so, the sheer number of members suggests that Canada’s medical establishment is watching this trend with a keen eye.
“We have a saying: Once you see it, you can’t unsee it,” says Barbra Allen Bradshaw, describing what she sees as a benefit of the diet. Bradshaw, a pathologist in Abbotsford, B.C., is one of the site’s founders. “We didn’t know [these kinds of improvements] were possible because we didn’t know about this way of eating before,” she says.
Bradshaw and other LCHF supporters have launched a new organization, Canadian Clinicians for Therapeutic Nutrition, that is made up of about 3,500 physicians and allied health providers who believe that sugar, not fat, is the main driver of obesity and diabetes. They want to see Canada’s Food Guide include guidelines that favour fewer carbs and more fats. Some physicians go further and recommend LCHF diets s through weight-loss clinics and in medical visits, online forums and radio talk shows.
“We’re pushing forward, but we’re pushing against what’s currently in place,” says Berchuk. “We’re the early adopters, and we’re almost seen as heretics.”
This One Ingredient Swap Will Give Your Pancakes A Heart-Healthy BoostThis One Ingredient Swap Will Give Your Pancakes A Heart-Healthy Boost
Around the world, the theory that sugar rather than fat is harming our bodies is gaining traction. Gary Taubes’ bestselling book The Case Against Sugar meticulously lays out the argument that sugar is the root cause of obesity, diabetes, heart disease and hypertension. Over the past five years, the LCHF diet has been described in dozens of peer-reviewed scientific publications. Scroll through Twitter and you’ll find countless testaments from people around the world who swear that LCHF eating has changed their lives, from weight lost to autoimmune diseases cured to depression resolved. There are LCHF medical conferences and medical clinicsTED Talks and Caribbean cruises dedicated to this way of eating, a low-carb TV channel and even low-carb fast-food dining guides (KFC’s grilled chicken makes the cut, if you’re wondering).
It’s an appealing idea: Consume more fat, lose weight and gain all-around health benefits. What’s not to like?
The reality isn’t that simple, though. When it comes to diets, the line between scientific evidence and strongly held opinion is blurred. Despite all the before-and-after selfies hashtagged #keto, there is still not a single study that shows conclusively that the majority of people who follow this diet will experience sustained weight loss beyond two years, compared with low-fat diets.
Diets are an emotional, touchy subject. Dieting is about food, yes, but also so much more: success and failure, as well as status, bias, perception and self-esteem. Women experience so much shame related to their body image that researchers have developed a scale just to measure it: the Body Image Shame Scale. No matter where you look, the overall message is the same: Eat poorly and you’ve failed; eat well and you’re a star. But the definition of what it means to “eat poorly” or to “eat well” seems to be ever changing.
“Diet culture is tricky because the diet industry knows that diets aren’t cool anymore, so now it’s turned into a lifestyle change or a food lifestyle,” says Vincci Tsui, a registered dietitian in Calgary who specializes in working with clients with eating disorders.
To Tsui, LCHF is the latest manifestation of diet culture. “We live in a society that really upholds a certain type of body: a thin, athletic, able body. There is a status to that type of body. There are so many people who think that if you lose weight, then something is going right. I wish people could take a step back and be critical about why their body size is so important to them.”
Can Changing What Foods You Eat Improve Your Mental Health?Can Changing What Foods You Eat Improve Your Mental Health?
One thing is clear: It’s no longer in vogue to talk about size, scales or bikini bodies. Strong is the new skinny, as 1.5 million Instagram hashtags proclaim. We don’t admit to dieting to look svelte in a bathing suit, à la Special K commercials of the 1990s. Instead, we put coconut oil in coffee and call it bio-hacking. We eliminate groups of foods from our diet and refer to it as detoxing. We proclaim that we eat healthy to be role models for our kids, reduce our risk of disease and have more energy.
But we still live in a thriving diet culture that rewards losing weight — it’s just packaged a little differently than before.
***
LCHF diets cover a spectrum. On one end, there’s what Berchuk calls the “modified Mediterranean diet,” which is plenty of vegetables, healthy fats and fish but less bread and pulses than the traditional approach. On the other extreme is the ketogenic diet. Diet Doctor, a website founded in 2011 by Swedish family doctor Andreas Eenfeldt and now the world’s biggest MD-driven “keto” site, terms it the “supercharged” version of low-carb eating. Keto is the current It diet, praised by svelte celebrities like Halle Berry and the raison d’être for some of the hottest cookbooks on the market.
Keto followers abstain from carbs, including most fruits (berries sometimes get a pass), to the point where they often get something called the “keto flu” in the first week — a fog of headaches, fatigue and irritability. The body, lacking the glucose it ordinarily gets through carbohydrates, goes through something called ketogenesis: Our livers begin to generate ketone bodies, or ketones, from fat. Proponents say that this accelerates fat burning.
In earlier incarnations of low-carb diets, followers replaced carbs with protein. But keto devotees rely more heavily on fat, deriving as much as 90 percent of their calories from it. Fat, they point out, is satiating — there’s no returning to the cupboard for a snack an hour after you eat. Many followers of keto intermittently fast, going 16 hours or more without food — like Berchuk when she skips breakfast — because of the belief that fat burning accelerates in a fasting state.
This Nutrient-Packed Ingredient Tastes As Good As Parmesan But Has Loads Of Health BenefitsThis Nutrient-Packed Ingredient Tastes As Good As Parmesan But Has Loads Of Health Benefits
Forty-five-year-old Berchuk is well versed in the ups and downs of diets: She has been a yo-yo dieter most of her life. In the fall of 2016, she was cycling through Italy but stressing about her weight. She read a book called Sugar Free and was struck by a list of behaviours described as signs of an addiction to sugar, including obsessive thoughts about sugar and carbs, dishonesty about consumption of them, shame and guilt around food and preoccupation with body image. She had every one of them, she says. By the time she flew home from the land of pizza and pasta, she was committed to trying a low-carb, higher-fat diet.
That’s when she discovered the Facebook group. She has since become an ardent advocate of the LCHF way of eating and is studying to become board certified in obesity medicine. “I want to become an expert in obesity so that when I’m trying to convince stakeholders that we need to study this, I have some credibility,” she says. “I don’t want it to be just my own anecdote to say this works. I want expertise in this area.”
Bradshaw was diagnosed with gestational diabetes when she was pregnant with her third child at 41 and came across research that suggests that low-carbohydrate eating could help manage her blood sugar. She decided that’s what she would do, but her local diabetes education centre disapproved of her approach. It advised her to eat about 165 grams of carbs each day — that’s generally considered to be a low amount, but among most low-carb devotees, it registers as high. (A keto low-carb diet recommends under 20 to 30 grams of net carbs, or approximately one large potato or half of a hamburger bun, depending on your weight and activity level.)
After her child was born, Bradshaw returned to her normal diet of pastas, veggies, proteins and some processed foods for a few months, but couldn’t lose weight. She switched back to a diet without much bread, pasta, fruit or processed food. In a year, she lost 22 pounds.
The closed Facebook group has never been advertised — membership spread by word of mouth. In the beginning, it was mostly physicians looking to manage weight and metabolic issues, often after pregnancy. Now, members seek support and recipes and exchange virtual high-fives when someone hits a goal weight. They discuss the pushback they get from colleagues. One expressed frustration when a general practitioner advised a family member, who’d lost weight on an LCHF diet but experienced a rise in cholesterol, to stop the diet and start taking a statin.
Over time, members have become vocal advocates for the LCHF approach, sharing ideas on how to take on the high-carb, processed-food environment we live in. Bradshaw has led campaigns to pull chocolate milk and sugary treats from her kids’ schools, and she and a colleague recently met with Health Canada representatives to discuss concerns about Canada’s Food Guide. They often point out the relationship between guidelines and food manufacturers, arguing that food companies pay for and publicize research that supports their products, flimsy though the research may be.
“It’s become a grassroots entity where things are happening from the bottom up, and we’re trying to push the change upward,” says Bradshaw.
Carolyn Snider, an emergency physician in Winnipeg who follows a low-carb diet, often advises patients to cut down on their sugar intake. It’s not traditional advice given in the emergency department, but “nutrition often contributes to the reason why a patient may be in the emergency department,” Snider argues. “I feel a responsibility to make suggestions on potential changes, just as if they were to come in having been in a car crash and not wearing their seat belt. I have a responsibility to talk about not wearing a seat belt.”
Snider, who has a master’s in public health, doesn’t consider LCHF to be a fad diet. Like all the experts I spoke with, she doesn’t believe that one diet is right for everyone, but she does think that LCHF may be the right diet for some people. “In the medical community, we don’t believe there’s one type of hypertensive for people with high blood pressure or one type of chemotherapy for people with cancer,” she says, “so I’m not sure why there’s an insistence on only one right way to eat.”
Calgary family doctor Michelle Klassen became interested in LCHF after another physician raised the topic at a professional meeting. Klassen reviewed the published medical literature and found the evidence “compelling” enough to recommend an LCHF diet to her patients.
Based on what she found, Klassen started a dedicated weight and metabolic management program for her patients with insulin resistance. She offers group medical appointments in which patients are counselled to avoid sugars, eat natural fat and partake in intermittent fasting if it works for them. Patients may use all or a combination of those tools to help attain and maintain their health. The program is part food education, part cognitive therapy, says Klassen.
Some physicians are reticent to speak on the record about their interest in LCHF, concerned that their take on the science surrounding LCHF diets runs counter to Canada’s Food Guide and the conventional low-fat approach. “Everybody is worried that we’re going to get in trouble with our licensing bodies because this isn’t the mainstream,” says Berchuk.
How Do I Know If I Need To Lose Weight For My Health?
In Canada and elsewhere, LCHF-advocating physicians have been reported to their professional bodies because of their comments. In two high-profile cases, South African doctor Tim Noakes and Australian orthopedic surgeon Gary Fettle have been investigated for offering “medical advice” that favours LCHF diets. Last fall, Quebec family physician Evelyne Bourdua-Roy was reported to her provincial body after comments she made on a radio talk show were reported as medical “advice.” (Bourdua-Roy was not available for an interview for this article.)
The LCHF way of eating doesn’t align with the current Canada’s Food Guide, which is endorsed by Health Canada but roundly criticized by experts in obesity. The guide recommends that women aged 19 to 50 eat six to seven servings of grain products a day and seven to eight servings of fruit and vegetables, and it recommends lower-fat milk alternatives. Following the tips in the food guide will, according to the guide, “reduce your risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, certain types of cancer and osteoporosis.”
Health Canada is expected to release a long-awaited updated food guide later this year. The main principles for the new guide, which were released in 2017, emphasize more plant-based foods and call for a reduction in processed and prepared foods that are high in sodium, sugar and saturated fat. These changes would direct Canadians to eat more fibre-rich foods and less red meat and replace the mostly saturated fats we consume, such as cream, high-fat cheese and butter, with unsaturated fats in the form of nuts, seeds and avocado.
***
Every day, another nutrition study is reported, often contradicting a report from not long before: You’ll live longer on a vegan diet! You’ll lose weight faster by eating meat! Meat causes cancer! Chocolate is good for you! Chocolate makers paid for the chocolate studies! It’s a dizzying parade of anecdotes presented as conclusions — a way of selling hope to people who despair over their weight.
As a society, despite the recent rise in body-positivity messaging, we still applaud weight loss as a testament of willpower and commitment and view anyone without a normal or low body mass index (BMI) as less worthy of a job or less attractive. This has been borne out in studies. The prevalence of obesity stigma is comparable to rates of racial discrimination, especially among women.
Our angst over food and weight plays out in eating disorders, reported in between one and 3.5 percent of women. But those statistics probably woefully underestimate their true prevalence. A telling statistic about women’s relationship with food comes from a 2008 survey by Self magazine, in which 65 percent of women said they were disordered eaters.
And if you’ll pardon yet another anecdote from the front lines of dieting: I almost died from an eating disorder two decades ago. I will attest despair is not too strong a word to describe our relationship to our food.
In this food environment, people frantically chase fad diets, seduced by the latest studies and testaments from people who attest that this will be different: “This is what worked for me.”
Physicians, too, are looking for answers. They acknowledge that the current advice given to people who are looking to lose weight is not sufficient in an environment that pounds us with highly processed food at every turn. Over a 39-year period, the prevalence of obesity in Canadian adultsincreased from 10 to 26 percent. Among children, obesity has tripled since 1981. Obesity now accounts for $3.9 billion in direct health care costs and $3.2 billion in indirect costs.
With nearly half of Canadian women and two-thirds of Canadian men facing increased health risks from excess weight, plenty of experts acknowledge that the status quo is not working. “The likelihood of obesity going away on its own is low, and I think the world is recognizing that,” says Yoni Freedhoff, an Ottawa bariatric physician who wrote The Diet Fix. In the book, he argues that people lose weight successfully when they take the suffering out of dieting. If a diet isn’t sustainable, the weight loss won’t be sustainable. Freedhoff doesn’t diss low-carb diets — they often work well in the short term, he says. But they are not commonly sustainable in the long term.
If we’re going to change the trajectory of obesity and related illnesses in Canada, it won’t be accomplished by a diet, says Freedhoff. Our relationship with food has changed dramatically in the past 40 years — the way we use food, the way food is marketed and engineered, portion sizes and the ubiquity of food at all social gatherings. “These are the things that need to change if we’re to break out of the cycle of dieting,” he says.
For the vast majority of people, attempts at weight loss don’t work in the long run. In fact, the more times a person attempts to lose weight with an unsustainable diet, the more likely they are to gain weight in the end.“I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with weight gain, but if a diet tends to produce the opposite effect of what you want it to do, then why are you still doing it?” asks Tsui.
10 Foods That Can Help Fight Dementia10 Foods That Can Help Fight Dementia
***
The LCHF diet — even its keto extreme — isn’t a totally new idea. A version of the keto diet has been around as a treatment for kids with epilepsy since the 1920s, after reports that the absence of food — starvation for two or three days — helped control seizures. In the past 20 years, it has once again gained in popularity as a treatment for epilepsy. Mayo Clinic researchers proposed that the benefits of fasting could be obtained through a ketogenic diet. Almost every textbook on epilepsy in children published between 1941 and 1980 reports on ketogenic diets.
Support for ketogenic eating is also growing in the diabetic community. A 2017 study in the journal Nature showed that people who had pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes and followed a ketogenic diet lost more weight and had greater reductions in medication needs than people who followed a low-fat, low-calorie diet.
But when it comes to weight loss, conclusive evidence that an LCHF approach is better than low-fat and low-calorie diets in the long term doesn’t yet exist. Neither is there conclusive evidence that an LCHF approach is harmful. A large, much-anticipated trial, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association this winter, showed that people experienced no difference in weight loss by eating low-fat or low-carb, provided that they limited their intake of added sugars, refined carbs and highly processed foods.
‘I Can’t Magically Shrink Myself To Accommodate Others.’ Why I Called Out A Fat-Shamer On A Flight
Kevin Hall, a Canadian researcher who has led some of the most robust studies of low-carb versus low-fat eating at the National Institutes of Health in the United States, says that many fantastic claims made about keto diets — easy weight loss, better mental clarity, reduced depression — aren’t borne out by research. That said, “there doesn’t seem to be any huge problem with the things people used to be very concerned about [with low-carb diets], such as the dangerous effects of fat on cholesterol.”
Shahzadi Devje, a registered dietitian and certified diabetes educator in Toronto, says that larger, longer and higher-quality studies of LCHF are needed before she would recommend the diet. She tells her patients that short-term studies in small population groups show that the keto diet can help with weight loss in the first year, after which weight loss seems to plateau. She also notes the side effects (fatigue, headaches, brain fog and bad breath). Devje also warns that an overall uptick in fat intake may mean that you’re getting more trans and saturated fats, which may increase the risk of heart disease for some people. “I don’t have a sexy message for you but to say that evidence is lacking,” says Devje.
She counsels patients to focus on eating whole foods and plants and consider a food’s quality rather than its macronutrients. Eat healthy fats like nuts, avocados and olive oil, she says, but also eat legumes, lentils, starchy vegetables and whole grains. “A successful diet allows for the pleasure of eating,” she says. “That’s why it’s sustainable. People can incorporate it into their daily lives and see improvements in their blood sugar control. For me, a diet is a way of life.”
In Calgary, Klassen and Berchuk are trying to get a study under way to look at patients who go on LCHF diets prior to surgery. “We feel quite passionate about this because it’s worked for us,” says Berchuk. “It’s all anecdotal, but enough anecdote finally builds a case.”
It worked for them. Only time will tell if this is the diet that will work for people who are struggling to lose weight and keep it off. History suggests a healthy dose of skepticism may be in order.
This story was originally published on May 30, 2018 and updated on June 4.

a lists Ketogenic Diet’s benefits


Studies that focus specifically on Keto Diet
  1. A Critique of Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Weight Reduction Regimens (Council on Foods and Nutrition of the American Medical Association, 1973) – Source
  2. Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v. low-fat diet for long-term weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. (Bueno et al., 2013) – Source
  3. Ketogenic Diet for Obesity: Friend or Foe? (Paoli, 2014) – Source
  4. Ketosis, ketogenic diet and food intake control: a complex relationship (Paoli et al., 2015) – Source
  5. Fat-Free Mass Changes During Ketogenic Diets and the Potential Role of Resistance Training (Tinsley and Willoughby, 2016) – Source
  6. International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition (Aragon et al., 2017) – Source
  7. Composition of weight lost during short-term weight reduction. Metabolic responses of obese subjects to starvation and low-calorie ketogenic and nonketogenic diets (Yang and Itallie, 1976) – Source
  8. Protein sparing during treatment of obesity: ketogenic versus nonketogenic very low calorie diet (Vazquez and Adibi, 1992) – Source
  9. The effects of a high-protein, low-fat, ketogenic diet on adolescents with morbid obesity: body composition, blood chemistries, and sleep abnormalities (Willi et al., 1998) – Source
  10. Comparison of energy-restricted very low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets on weight loss and body composition in overweight men and women (Volek et al., 2004) – Source
  11. Effects of a high-protein ketogenic diet on hunger, appetite, and weight loss in obese men feeding ad libitum (Johnstone et al., 2008) – Source
  12. Resistance training in overweight women on a ketogenic diet conserved lean body mass while reducing body fat (Jabekk et al., 2010) – Source
  13. Ketogenic diet does not affect strength performance in elite artistic gymnasts (Paoli et al., 2012) – Source
  14. The effect of weight loss by ketogenic diet on the body composition, performance-related physical fitness factors and cytokines of Taekwondo athletes (Rhyu and Cho, 2014) – Source
  15. The effects of ketogenic dieting on skeletal muscle and fat mass (Rauch et al., 2014) – Source
  16. Short-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of a very low-calorie-ketogenic diet interventional weight loss program versus hypocaloric diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Goday et al., 2016) – Source
  17. Very-low-calorie ketogenic diet with aminoacid supplement versus very low restricted-calorie diet for preserving muscle mass during weight loss: a pilot double-blind study (Merra et al., 2016) – Source
  18. A Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet Combined with 6-Weeks of Crossfit Training Improves Body Composition and Performance (Gregory et al., 2017) – Sources
  19. The Effects of Ketogenic Dieting on Body Composition, Strength, Power, and Hormonal Profiles in Resistance Training Males (Wilson et al., 2017) – Sources
  20. Efficacy and safety of very-low-calorie ketogenic diet: a double blind randomized crossover study (Colica et al., 2017) – Source
  21. Capacity for Moderate Exercise in Obese Subjects after Adaptation to a Hypocaloric, Ketogenic Diet (Phinney et al., 1980) – Source
  22. Ketogenic diets and physical performance (Phinney, 2004) – Source
  23. Acute nutritional ketosis: implications for exercise performance and metabolism (Cox and Clarke, 2014) – Source
  24. Nutritional Ketosis Alters Fuel Preference and Thereby Endurance Performance in Athletes (Cox et al., 2016) – Source
  25. The Effects of a Ketogenic Diet on Exercise Metabolism and Physical Performance in Off-Road Cyclists (Zajac et al., 2014) – Source
  26. Metabolic characteristics of keto-adapted ultra-endurance runners (Volek et al., 2016) – Source
  27. Ketogenic diet benefits body composition and well-being but not performance in a pilot case study of New Zealand endurance athletes (Zinn et al., 2017) – Source
  28. Clinical Aspects of the Ketogenic Diet (Hartman and Vining, 2007) – Source
  29. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet to treat type 2 diabetes (Yancy et al., 2005) – Source
  30. Beneficial effects of ketogenic diet in obese diabetic subjects (Dashti et al., 2007) – Source
  31. The effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (Westman et al., 2008) – Source
  32. Effect of low-calorie versus low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in type 2 diabetes (Hussain et al., 2012) – Source
  33. An Online Intervention Comparing a Very Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations Versus a Plate Method Diet in Overweight Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (Saslow et al., 2017) – Source
  34. Effects of Ketogenic Diets on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies (Kosinski and Jornayvaz, 2017) – Source
  35. The AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Is Involved in the Regulation of Ketone Body Production by Astrocytes (Blázquez et al., 1999) – Source
  36. The calorically restricted ketogenic diet, an effective alternative therapy for malignant brain cancer (Zhou et al., 2007) – Source
  37. Role of ketogenic metabolic therapy in malignant glioma: A systematic review (Winter et al., 2017) – Source
  38. A Nutritional Perspective of Ketogenic Diet in Cancer: A Narrative Review (Oliveira et al., 2017) – Source
  39. Beneficial effects of ketogenic diets for cancer patients: a realist review with focus on evidence and confirmation (Klement, 2017) – Source
  40. Systematic review: isocaloric ketogenic dietary regimes for cancer patients (Erickson et al., 2017) – Source
  41. Assessing the Role of the Ketogenic Diet as a Metabolic Therapy in Cancer: Is it Evidence Based? (Macias and Sharpe, 2017) – Source
  42. Pleiotropic effects of nutritional ketosis: Conceptual framework for keto-adaptation as a breast cancer therapy (Hyde et al., 2017) – Source
  43. A Multicenter Study of the Efficacy of the Ketogenic Diet (Vining et al., 1998) – Source
  44. Ketogenic diet for the treatment of refractory epilepsy in children: A systematic review of efficacy (Lefevre and Aronson, 2000) – Source
  45. Fasting versus Gradual Initiation of the Ketogenic Diet: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (Bergqvist et al., 2005) – Source
  46. Efficacy of the Ketogenic Diet as a Treatment Option for Epilepsy: Meta-analysis (Henderson et al., 2006) – Source
  47. The ketogenic diet: From molecular mechanisms to clinical effects (Freeman et al., 2006) – Source
  48. The Neuropharmacology of the Ketogenic Diet (Hartman et al., 2007) – Source
  49. The ketogenic diet for the treatment of childhood epilepsy: a randomised controlled trial (Neal et al., 2008) – Source
  50. Ketogenic diet for treatment of epilepsy (Rogovik and Goldman, 2010) – Source
  51. The ketogenic diet: metabolic influences on brain excitability and epilepsy (Lutas and Yellen, 2013) – Source
  52. Is Ketogenic Diet Truly Effective in Mitochondrial Epilepsy? (Finsterer and Kothari et al., 2014) – Source
  53. Dietary and Medication Adjustments to Improve Seizure Control in Patients Treated With the Ketogenic Diet (Selter et al., 2014) – Source
  54. Ketogenic diet in adolescents and adults with epilepsy (Nei et al., 2014) – Source
  55. Ketogenic diet and other dietary treatments for epilepsy (Martin et al., 2016) – Source
  56. A randomized controlled trial of the ketogenic diet in refractory childhood epilepsy (Lambrechts et al., 2016) – Source
  57. Impact of a Modified Ketogenic Diet on Seizure Activity, Biochemical Markers, Anthropometrics and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Adults with Epilepsy (Schuchmann et al., 2017) – Source
  58. How does the ketogenic diet induce anti-seizure effects? (Rho, 2017) – Source
  59. Efficacy of ketogenic diet in resistant myoclono-astatic epilepsy: A french multicenter retrospective study (de Saint-Martin et al., 2017) – Source
  60. The role for ketogenic diets in epilepsy and status epilepticus in adults (Williams et al., 2017) – Source
  61. Long-term effects of a ketogenic diet in obese patients (Dashti et al., 2004) – Source
  62. Neuroprotective and disease-modifying effects of the ketogenic diet (Gasior et al., 2006) – Source
  63. Timeline of changes in appetite during weight loss with a ketogenic diet (Nymo et al., 2017) – Source
  64. Ketogenic diet in migraine: rationale, findings and perspectives (Barbanti et al., 2017) – Source
  65. The neuroprotective properties of calorie restriction, the ketogenic diet, and ketone bodies (Maalouf et al., 2009) – Source
  66. A Ketogenic Diet Favorably Affects Serum Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease in Normal-Weight Men (Sharman et al., 2002) – Source
  67. A Ketogenic Diet Extends Longevity and Healthspan in Adult Mice (Roberts et al., 2017) – Source
  68. Ketogenic Diet Reduces Midlife Mortality and Improves Memory in Aging Mice (Newman et al., 2017) – Source
Group 2: Study focuses on low carb high fat diet or just low carb diet
  1. A Critique of Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Weight Reduction Regimens (Council on Foods and Nutrition of the American Medical Association, 1973) – Source
  2. Atkins and other low-carbohydrate diets: hoax or an effective tool for weight loss? (Astrup et al., 2004) – Source
  3. Very-low-carbohydrate diets and preservation of muscle mass (Manninen, 2006) – Source
  4. Low-Carbohydrate Diets Promote a More Favorable Body Composition Than Low-Fat Diets (Volek et al., 2010) – Source
  5. Effects of Low-Carbohydrate Diets Versus Low-Fat Diets on Metabolic Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (Hu et al., 2012) – Source
  6. Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v. low-fat diet for long-term weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. (Bueno et al., 2013) – Source
  7. Evidence that supports the prescription of low-carbohydrate high-fat diets: a narrative review (Noakes and Windt, 2016) – Source
  8. International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition (Aragon et al., 2017) – Source
  9. Body composition and hormonal responses to a carbohydrate-restricted diet (Volek et al., 2002) – Source
  10. Ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets have no metabolic advantage over nonketogenic low-carbohydrate diets (Johnston et al., 2006) – Source
  11. Effects of Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets: A Randomized Trial (Bazzano et al., 2014) – Source
  12. Adherence to low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets in relation to weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors (Hu et al., 2016) – Source
  13. The effect of an 8-week low carbohydrate high fat (LCHF) diet in sub-elite Olympic weightlifters and powerlifters on strength, body composition, mental state and adherence: a pilot case-study (Chatterton et al., 2017) – Source
  14. A Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet Combined with 6-Weeks of Crossfit Training Improves Body Composition and Performance (Gregory et al., 2017) – Source
  15. Fat utilization during exercise: adaptation to a fat-rich diet increases utilization of plasma fatty acids and very low density lipoprotein-triacylglycerol in humans (Helge et al., 2001) – Source
  16. Low-carbohydrate nutrition and metabolism (Westman et al., 2007) – Source
  17. Carbohydrates and exercise performance in non-fasted athletes: A systematic review of studies mimicking real-life (Colombani et al., 2013) – Source
  18. The use of carbohydrates during exercise as an ergogenic aid (Cermak and van Loon, 2013) – Source
  19. Re-Examining High-Fat Diets for Sports Performance: Did We Call the ‘Nail in the Coffin’ Too Soon? (Burke, 2015) – Source
  20. Gluconeogenesis during endurance exercise in cyclists habituated to a long-term low carbohydrate high-fat diet (Webster et al., 2016) – Source
  21. Differential in Maximal Aerobic Capacity by Sex in Collegiate Endurance Athletes Consuming a Marginally Low Carbohydrate Diet (Baranauskas et al., 2017) – Source
  22. Low-Carbohydrate-High-Fat Diet: Can it Help Exercise Performance? (Chang et al., 2017) – Source
  23. Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease after initiation of a low-carbohydrate diet: five brief case reports (Yancy et al., 2001) – Source
  24. A Very Low-Carbohydrate Diet Improves Gastroesophageal Reflux and Its Symptoms (Austin et al., 2006) – Source
  25. Systematic review: the effects of conservative and surgical treatment for obesity on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (De Groot et al., 2009) – Source
  26. Dietary carbohydrate intake, insulin resistance and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study in European- and African-American obese women (Pointer et al., 2016) – Source
  27. A low-carbohydrate as compared with a low-fat diet in severe obesity (Samaha et al., 2003) – Source
  28. Effect of a Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Appetite, Blood Glucose Levels, and Insulin Resistance in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (Boden et al., 2005) – Source
  29. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet to treat type 2 diabetes (Yancy et al., 2005) – Source
  30. The effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet versus a low-glycemic index diet on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (Westman et al., 2008) – Source
  31. A critical review of low-carbohydrate diets in people with Type 2 diabetes (van Wyk et al., 2013) – Source
  32. Dietary carbohydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical review and evidence base (Feinman et al., 2015) – Source
  33. Is there a role for carbohydrate restriction in the treatment and prevention of cancer? (Klement and Kämmerer, 2011) – Source
  34. Low-carbohydrate nutrition and metabolism (Westman et al., 2007) – Source
  35. Vascular effects of a low-carbohydrate high-protein diet (Foo et al., 2009) – Source
  36. Effect of 6-month adherence to a very low carbohydrate diet program (Westman et al., 2002) – Source
  37. Adherence and success in long-term weight loss diets: the dietary intervention randomized controlled trial (DIRECT) (Greenberg et al., 2009) – Source
Group 3: Studies that show carbs are bad  
  1. Body composition and hormonal responses to a carbohydrate-restricted diet (Volek et al., 2002) – Source
  2. Carbohydrate intake and resistance-based exercise: are current recommendations reflective of actual need (Escobar et al., 2016) – Source
Group 4: Studies that show fats are good
  1. Evidence that supports the prescription of low-carbohydrate high-fat diets: a narrative review (Noakes and Windt, 2016) – Source
  2. Consuming a hypocaloric high fat low carbohydrate diet for 12 weeks lowers C-reactive protein, and raises serum adiponectin and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol in obese subjects (Ruth et al., 2013) – Source
  3. The effect of an 8-week low carbohydrate high fat (LCHF) diet in sub-elite Olympic weightlifters and powerlifters on strength, body composition, mental state and adherence: a pilot case-study (Chatterton et al., 2017) – Source
  4. Fat utilization during exercise: adaptation to a fat-rich diet increases utilization of plasma fatty acids and very low density lipoprotein-triacylglycerol in humans (Helge et al., 2001) – Source
  5. Re-Examining High-Fat Diets for Sports Performance: Did We Call the ‘Nail in the Coffin’ Too Soon? (Burke, 2015) – Source
  6. Associations of fats and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 18 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study (Dehghan et al., 2017) – Source

Final thoughts


Although these are just some studies on the low carb high fat and ketogenic diets, it is also important to mention there are thousands of published studies on this topic and many, many more are still in progress and unpublished. With time and as technology advances, we can find more proofs that the Ketogenic Diet’s benefits will be further cemented.