Scientists Just Discovered a Major “Hole” in the Standard Model of Parti...

Scientists Just Discovered a Major “Hole” in the Standard Model of Particle Physics Seeker 5.05M subscribers Subscribe 13K Share Download Clip Save 403,697 views Apr 16, 2021 #seeker #particles #particlephysics The long-awaited results from Fermilab's g-2 experiment are finally here...and they confirm that the Standard Model—you know, the one that aims to explain the forces that shape our universe—may need some major reworking. » Subscribe to Seeker! http://bit.ly/subscribeseeker » Watch more Elements! http://bit.ly/ElementsPlaylist » Visit our shop at http://shop.seeker.com The muon is one of 12 elementary particles described by the Standard Model. This model aims to understand how each of these particles is affected by the universe’s four known forces—the strong, weak, gravitational, and electromagnetic. These twelve particles are divided into quarks and leptons, which are each further divided into six distinct “flavors.” Like electrons, muons are just one “flavor” of leptons. They also spin like a top and have a negative charge, meaning they’re able to generate their own magnetic field. So, when a muon’s internal “magnet” is exposed to a strong external magnetic field—like one produced by, say, a particle accelerator—the muon starts to wobble. The rate of this wobble is what physicists call its “g-factor,” or magnetic moment. #physics #standardmodel #particles #particlephysics #seeker #science #elements Read More: First results from Fermilab’s Muon g-2 experiment strengthen evidence of new physics https://news.fnal.gov/2021/04/first-r... "The strong evidence that muons deviate from the Standard Model calculation might hint at exciting new physics. Muons act as a window into the subatomic world and could be interacting with yet undiscovered particles or forces." "Last Hope’ Experiment Finds Evidence for Unknown Particles" https://www.quantamagazine.org/muon-g... "However, even as many particle physicists are likely to be celebrating — and racing to propose new ideas that could explain the discrepancy — a paper published today in the journal Nature casts the new muon measurement in a dramatically duller light. The paper...suggests that the muon’s measured wobbliness is exactly what the Standard Model predicts." A Tiny Particle’s Wobble Could Upend the Known Laws of Physics https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/07/sc... "The results, the first from an experiment called Muon g-2, agreed with similar experiments at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in 2001 that have teased physicists ever since." ____________________ Elements is more than just a science show. It’s your science-loving best friend, tasked with keeping you updated and interested in all the compelling, innovative, and groundbreaking science happening all around us. Join our passionate hosts as they help break down and present fascinating science, from quarks to quantum theory and beyond. Seeker empowers the curious to understand the science shaping our world. We tell award-winning stories about the natural forces and groundbreaking innovations that impact our lives, our planet, and our universe. Visit the Seeker website https://www.seeker.com/videos Elements on Facebook / seekerelements Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c... Seeker on Twitter / seeker Seeker on Facebook / seekermedia Seeker http://www.seeker.com/ Key moments View all Featured places See more information in Google Maps Fermilab Laboratory 4.7 (606) Details Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript Transcript Search in video 0:00 More than 20 years ago, a team at Brookhaven National Lab detected a missing piece in the Standard Model. 0:07 A measurement they had taken to better understand the effects of the forces that shape our universe was...off. 0:13 So, the international physics community came up with a plan: Take the measurement again with much more powerful instruments and see what sticks. 0:22 Fast forward to April 7th, 2021, that highly anticipated measurement is finally in… 0:28 and it seems like the Brookhaven results weren't a fluke. 0:31 This means that our current understanding of the universe may not account for every particle and force within it, 0:37 and therefore, may need to be entirely reworked. 0:41 So, this experiment is looking at little elementary particles called muons. 0:46 And what we really care about muons for this experiment is that they're like little spinning tops. They're like little magnets. 0:53 As it turns out, muons are one of the most precise ways for scientists to probe the quantum world. 0:59 The muon is one of 12 elementary particles described by the Standard Model. 1:03 This model aims to understand how each of these particles is affected by the universe’s four known forces: 1:09 the strong, weak, gravitational, and electromagnetic. 1:13 These twelve particles are divided into quarks and leptons, which are each further divided into six distinct “flavors.” 1:21 Like electrons, muons are just one “flavor” of leptons. 1:25 They also spin like a top and have a negative charge, meaning they’re able to generate their own magnetic field. 1:32 So, when a muon’s internal “magnet” is exposed to a strong external magnetic field— 1:37 like one produced by, say, a particle accelerator— 1:40 the muon starts to wobble. 1:42 The rate of this wobble is what physicists call its “g-factor,” or magnetic moment. 1:48 This is an experiment that allows us to see from the wobble of the muons, what's an otherwise invisible quantum world 1:56 that contains all kinds of stuff that we'd like to know about. 1:59 So, it's basically, it's pointing us to something that we don't understand. And this is why it's very interesting. 2:06 Muons are around 200 times heavier than electrons, 2:10 which means the moment they become ‘magnetic’ is 200 times smaller... 2:14 and therefore way more sensitive to all of the virtual particles swimming around in the quantum realm. 2:20 So, to measure this moment, precision is everything. 2:23 Which is exactly what physicists from around the world have been after. 2:27 Which brings us back to the Brookhaven experiment. 2:29 In 2001, the team published some surprising findings. 2:33 Their measurement of the muon’s g-factor deviated from the Standard Models’ prediction, 2:37 and nothing could account for the difference. 2:39 Instead of finding a g-factor slightly above 2 as the Standard Model had predicted, 2:45 they’d found a g-factor that was off by nearly 3 standard deviations. 2:49 The Brookhaven experiment was a big surprise. 2:52 It made a lot of people think that maybe there's something we really don't understand either about particle physics, 2:58 or about how to do these kinds of experiments. 3:00 So, the physics community decided that the only way to confirm these findings was to take that measurement again. 3:07 Led by Fermilab, the Muon g-2 experiment cast its first beam of particles back in 2017 3:13 and has been searching for the muon’s g-factor ever since. 3:16 We decided to combine the experimental techniques by moving the magnetic ring from Brookhaven National Lab, 3:24 all the way to Fermilab. 3:25 Fermilab’s accelerators first blast particles into a giant ring where they decay into muons. 3:32 These muons then travel to a second ring, where they spin and start to wobble in reaction to the ring’s powerful magnets. 3:39 By comparing measurements of this wobble with the ring’s magnetic field, 3:42 the team is able to walk away with a measurement of the magnetic moment—with a precision of 0.14 parts per million. 3:50 At this level of precision, we get a window into the world of muons that we’ve never had before... 3:56 and a more specific number to compare our theoretical predictions with. 4:00 It's taken 20 years of effort by theorists like me to actually make these very, very precise predictions that we're checking. 4:07 And it's the difference between that theory prediction and what the experiment sees, that could be something new— 4:13 some new force of nature, or something that we just didn't know about. 4:16 After years of intense efforts on the part of the team and the muon beam, the first round of results are finally ready. 4:23 So, the new measurement agrees amazingly well with the Brookhaven measurement from 20 years ago, 4:30 and the fact that now you have two different experiments, including this much more modern version, 4:36 getting the same answer to me says that the experiments are probably right. 4:41 This is the kind of breakthrough that you live for when you're doing science. 4:45 The team still has to analyze more data from this experiment, 4:48 so there’s a chance that they’d stumble on some answers in those numbers. 4:52 But one thing is for sure: The team’s search for muon’s magnetic moment definitely isn’t over. 4:58 To me, what's exciting is that we don't know what it is that they're seeing. 5:02 But whatever it is, it would have to be something fundamentally new. 5:06 It's not just a little bit different, it would be something that I think would revolutionize our thinking, whatever it turns out to be. 5:13 We’ve actually covered Fermilab’s work on the channel before—check that video out here. 5:17 Let us know what you think is lurking out there in the universe that could explain the g-2’s latest findings. 5:22 And make sure to subscribe to Seeker to hopefully, one day, find out. 5:26 Thanks for watching and I’ll see you next time! Seeker 5.05M subscribers Videos About Facebook Instagram Twitter Seeker+ 891 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @Judoka008 3 years ago Idk what any of this stuff means but I'm thrilled that there are people who do. 647 Reply 37 replies @Soooooooooooonicable 3 years ago Very exciting. Never stop asking questions, humanity. 304 Reply 10 replies @tessthetimeless 3 years ago Muons be vibing on a whole other level dude 416 Reply 11 replies @jonathanrolon609 3 years ago That scientist explained all of this in such a way that it was easy to understand. Free and awesome new information; that’s a big win for me. Thank you! 211 Reply 6 replies @PointyTailofSatan 3 years ago This might explain why socks keep disappearing in my dryer. 364 Reply 15 replies @dertythegrower 3 years ago This should be trending. This is next level research. Youtube would rather push their faketrending big money partners video that is not actually trending. 495 Reply 42 replies @AllknowingUnknown 3 years ago This is GREAT news. It further solidifies that we have more to learn and if it means that we have to change our understanding of science to move forward, then we will finally reach the next step in our development as a species. This was needed for a long while and I'm happy to be alive to witness it. 6 Reply @raditiyavalendeto4112 3 years ago the spiffing brit: the universe is perfectly balanced with no exploits 141 Reply 7 replies @shammyh 3 years ago (edited) Also... Explaining how incredibly precisely this same experiment does agree with the Standard Model when using electrons, helps to explain why the (extremely small, but statistically significant) disagreement with muons is so interesting. The standard model is still, almost certainly, correct, but it may well be missing some additional components, which is what this excitement is all about. 13 Reply 5 replies @beowulf2772 3 years ago I love you seeker, but please boost your audio a bit thanks :D 51 Reply 3 replies @theobserver191 3 years ago With all we have learned so far I believe we have only scratched the surface of what there is to discover. 17 Reply 2 replies @jcoghill2 3 years ago I once got a private tour of Fermi Lab. An amazing place. 5 Reply @Lemonz1989 3 years ago Just the thought of how far humanity has come with its knowledge in just the last 200 years is amazing. 3 Reply @professordanfurmanek3732 3 years ago As Doc Lincoln, from Fermilab would say, "Physics is Everything!". Outstanding job Seeker! Cutting Edge Science for the entire planet!! Kudos! 1 Reply @anywhereroam9698 3 years ago I’ve watched several videos on this. It’s fascinating. They used the same magnet from the older experiment. The theoretical calculation uses some values from data, from experiments. Also a competing theoretical calculation came up with a different result that is closer to the experiment. This result isn’t 5 sigma yet, which is what they benchmark discoveries at. As more experiments are done it may hit 5 sigma. Pretty exciting because either the theory is missing a particle or force or both or they are misunderstanding some of the data they are basing the calculations off or the experiment is a outlier (less likely from my limited understanding). 2 Reply @altrag 3 years ago (edited) They don't "spin like a top". Nobody knows what quantum spin is exactly. We know its a property particles have and it comes in units of angular momentum, but as far as we can tell there is nothing physically "spinning" in any manner that makes sense to us macroscopic beings. However, the spin-that-isn't-spinning does wobble like a top-that-really-is-spinning, a phenomena called "precession" in fancy physics speak. 1 Reply @SnoopyDoofie 3 years ago Steve Job's response: "You're holding it wrong." 20 Reply 2 replies @anodominate 3 years ago (edited) First I thought there is hole in large Hadron Collider. 32 Reply 5 replies @supercheetah778 3 years ago Small nitpick, that's a minus sign, and not a dash, so it's properly called "g minus two" to emphasis the difference from two. 31 Reply 2 replies @gildardorivasvalles6368 3 years ago What is off by more than 3 standard deviations is NOT the difference between the theory and the experiment -- it is the measure of the certainty that the result is not a fluke: the higher the number of standard deviations, the less likely that the difference is not a mere statistical fluctuation. And there are other calculations (based on another approach) more in line with the measured value, so the story is not over yet 3 Reply @SolidSiren 3 years ago They don't "spin like a top". They don't spin. They HAVE spin, an intrinsic property that doesn't change. 14 Reply 2 replies @groundsymphony 3 years ago Not just the physics, I don’t understand how they engineered such machine. Is there any video explaining the engineering part of these particle accelerators? How on earth does one detects something so tiny and be able to know how it vibrates? People say I’m always stress about school, no, I’m stress for not knowing 1% of how this machine works 1 Reply @0ptimal 3 years ago Could have sworn someone told me we know everything already. We're probably still in the stone age as far as understanding what life is goes. 9 Reply @NatarajSubramanian 3 years ago Seeker rocks! Probably my most favourite channel on YouTube. 😊 Reply @viejodelentes6079 3 years ago It is cool that scientists still have their hands full and discovering new stuff about how the universe works. 1 Reply @PeterSodhi 3 years ago Outstanding presentation 5 Reply @connecticutaggie 3 years ago CERN also recently released a paper from the LHCb data on a potential violation of lepton flavour universality. This indicates the Muon and Electron are more different than the Standard Model predicts. Maybe these are related. 4 Reply 1 reply @NukSooLang 3 years ago Another intriguing and educational video. Nicely done, Seeker! But please, please please please, turn up your microphone gain. Your audio levels are sitting at about 50%-60% of other YT videos. (Which is fine until I click on another video without turning my speakers down, and the audio is loud enough to damage spacetime) Reply @jerryiuliano871 3 years ago How to calculate the muon g minus 2 factor using only the electron and proton. Let Me=electron mass= 9.109383607*10^-31 kg, Let emev= electron energy=.5109989461, Let prmev= proton energy= 938.2720831, then it can be shown: (prmev/emev)-(37/477/emev)-12 above divided by (10^33)*Me = 2.0023318362, which is exact for theoretical calculation of g minus 2. Reply @2Glock30s 3 years ago I am so happy to be alive in a time where we are making these types of discoveries. 2 Reply @igkslife 3 years ago Spin, magnetic field, and is negatively charged? With the magnetic field produced by a electric magnet making it wobble. So, in other words the magnetic fields are interacting with each other to create the g moment? Or is the electro magnetic field interacting with something else like the spin of the muon? OR is the electro magnetic field interacting with the negative polarity of the particle? OR is the electro magnetic field interacting with a new force we have yet to discovered? If so why, and how does it interact by wobbling? 1 Reply @wallstreetoneil 3 years ago A rival group (BMW), the same day specifically published a paper stating the new results were not inconsistent with Theory - this probably should have mentioned. The far bigger question is why do 2 entirely different groups, with a lot of PhDs on both sides, who have signed their names to these papers, completely disagree with what the Standard Model is predicting. Very rare that something like this happens. 1 Reply 1 reply @Omnifarious0 3 years ago Dragons! It's dragons that are messing with the muons. I've heard that this could be an error in the method used to calculate the theoretically predicted value of the muon's magnetic moment. It seems odd to me that there's an effect on the muon's magnetic moment, but there doesn't seem to be a measurable effect on the electron's. Though, perhaps there's an explanation lurking out there for why there appear to be 3 and only 3 members of each family of each fundamental fermion. 3 Reply 2 replies @pixxelwizzard 3 years ago Exciting stuff, Maynard! Well explained and presented, thank you! 1 Reply @fugslayernominee1397 3 years ago Great video as always! Seeker ❤️ 19 Reply @croco12 3 years ago i got my mind blown hearing this, even though i didnt understand anything. 2 Reply 1 reply @jacobstewart4013 3 years ago was looking forward to your video on this experiment! yall break down science the best! love your videos! 2 Reply @notmyrealnameful 3 years ago Muons do not spin like tops. They have spin, which is best modelled as circular polarisation arising from the phase of the real and imaginary components of the wave function. The top analogy is ultimately more confusing than helpful. 4 Reply 2 replies @shammyh 3 years ago "spin like a top" is a pretty bad analogy... They do not actually "spin" they simply have a property, which is confusingly called, "spin". But really, a name which doesn't imply physical movement would be a better name. 4 Reply @AdamWestish 3 years ago That's trippy... Once I heard from another video (I think a Sean Carroll Higgs presentation) that the muon was mostly a heavier electron, and the tau an even heavier version of _that_, somehow it seemed like the muon experiments might break through the wall of the standard model finally. There are some interesting holes in it for sure... Reply @rd9831 3 years ago And 20 years later the great scientists will say nutrinos are something we have not understood and that is the holy grail. Keep at it guys. 1 Reply @onidaaitsubasa4177 3 years ago It makes me wonder if they checked the physical temperature in the accelerator and the magnetic ring in relation to the wobble, if there is a correlation then it could bring some interesting factors to light, since temperature can affect things at a quantum level, it would be an interesting experiment, and if successful they could get much better measurements and even control of the wobble. 2 Reply @walkinmn 3 years ago I've seen many videos about the subject and I have to say this might be the best one, that is able to explain it in a brief and accessible way, well done Seeker! 3 Reply @krasnavin 3 years ago We continue to discover what we don't know. Fascinating and awesome! 2 Reply @spacepanda420 3 years ago (edited) The problem is that we think we know everything about everything already. Perfect example of how much could still be out there. Reply @salvatoremaximus6754 3 years ago One step towards the discovery of Pym Particles, wow, I'm really excited. 3 Reply 3 replies @sayedchowdhury1290 3 years ago Impressed by beauty of Presenter!!! Reply @MultiFandom8isFate 3 years ago Okay new lessons for students folks! 60 Reply 5 replies @Telencephelon 3 years ago What's lurking out there is the clickbaiticon. Every year its attraction increases. It is now so strong that it influences even electrons 6 Reply 4 replies @MrJamesdryable 3 years ago The better the instruments we create, the further down and out we will reach. The universe is infinite in both directions. 4 Reply 6 replies @joshuagibson4509 3 years ago I believe that these exist in nature in a couple areas, pending further data analysis I look into. The concept of a magnetic moment is beautiful too me because it is a moment I have already envisioned in other phenomena and as well as believe I have experienced is subjectively. The moment in forces working against each other reach a balanced line of convergence and either become one like gravity, and when the convergence line becomes something different entirely and separates the other two firmaments, like two different colored bodies of water. Second, I believe our conscious decision making attention is some type of complex formation of this. I picture ourselves as the muon type function that can easily be overtaken by the heart neurons and gut, the brain, or can decide through training to always be separate of the two systems thru a moment of self actualization. Spanning from there, love. Humans can love things animate or inanimate. So, having our conscious relate to quantum physics, which is alive in all matter, and be of the magnetic type force, because we can click with inanimate objects, and be of this muon type or more complex, because it is in the realm of neurology we just do not understand yet. Tell me your thoughts. 1 Reply @XEinstein 3 years ago By now you should have mentioned the BMW calculations in your video as well, Seeker. The results of their calculations are well known by nog and come way closer to the experimental results than the previous calculations. So the debate is still anything but settled and it is still very possible that the standard model can accurately predict experimental results. Reply @johnnydoe2672 3 years ago We literally still don’t know anything about how the universe works, and that’s the most exciting part 6 Reply 3 replies @mje19D 3 years ago I can't wait to see what they discover! 3 Reply 1 reply @roysoender3587 3 years ago Nicely explained! THX. Hope we do not have to wait another 20 years to know for sure that we found something new. Reply @watema3381 3 years ago Yay! More stuff to learn in Physics class! 1 Reply @markdeffebach8112 3 years ago Bravo for being willing to accept that we must alwaya challenge the accepted standard models. So many science facts are in fact imperfect theories that go unchallenged as fact. I have a feeling that our misunderstandings go back further than we'd like to admit. Reply @watersfromwaters 3 years ago By what force the apple falls? It falls when it's ripe, when it is ready to eat. What else is there for us regarding apples? Reply @NecotheFreeko14 3 years ago Sheldon would be so pissed that the experimental physicists proved his theory wrong, lol. J/K Super cool video as always! 2 Reply @mr.bennett108 3 years ago See, I don't know if I know what is causing the wobble, but I do think that whatever it is also contributes to the CP-symmetry violations with Muon-neutrinos. 1 Reply @andrewsparkinson1566 3 years ago As a particle is Accelerated from point through point artificially, the wobble is just the two dimensional expression of the ‘spiralling motion’ a particle experiences under the influence of the environmental relative gravity. Reply @Fr0stbite1801 3 years ago Huge shout out to physicists. I love the whole "studying the building blocks of the universe and how they work" part but I despise the "and proving it through maths" part. 3 Reply @JaydenGarciaYT 3 years ago (edited) “Alright boys, time to rewrite centuries worth of information we thought we knew” “Yes sir...” 2 Reply @Merc_0158E7 3 years ago Accurately detecting that tricky tricky G factor. One of mans greatest mystery... XD Reply @spyro1159 3 years ago There is no major "hole". It's just more insight into one small thing that is unexplained. 6 Reply 1 reply @mactek6033 3 years ago The missing ingredient is LOVE. It's the creative force of the universe. Reply @danielash1704 3 years ago I find that frequencies can act like magnetic resonance and it tells you how it will respond. Reply @vasub3302 3 years ago Standard Model to scientists: What are you doing step bro. Reply @ahrimanic7 3 years ago One word: electromagnetism. 1 Reply @danielhenne3350 3 years ago I fell into a black hole and/or died but got a 1UP to keep loving and living, my minds eye is a singularity now, and I've got wormholes around me that are seriously making me have to decide whether to call the cops or not because of things that disappear while I AM home its really annoying while I don't have any legit scientists around here to check all this stuff out bc I can demonstrate the stuff in a jiffy, but it's hard to get in touch with ppl Reply @scruffasax 3 years ago I'm not even a scientist and I've been saying this for years.. "there are particles that we don't know about and discovering them might show that the way we understand the universe may be wrong". I thought we all knew this? Reply @johnj8639 3 years ago One hundred million “CPU” hours? Or roughly 11,000 years? I don’t think that estimate is correct unless CPU hours is some how shorter than an actual hour? 1 Reply @sphakamisozondi 3 years ago Why isn't this trending. It's actually a big deal. Reply @TheInevitableHulk 3 years ago Fermilab's experiment is not confirmed, we are just more confident than we were with the Brookhaven experiment but it needs to be even more confident to be considered a discovery. 34 Reply 7 replies @justinb9223 3 years ago Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read an article about this experiment and I don't believe the team can claim this as a discovery just yet due to the statistical probability of this being a fluke. 6 Reply 4 replies @XxFab5Mas13rxX 3 years ago Ayyyy I used to work at BNL! 7 Reply 1 reply @og5278 3 years ago This experiment changes the world of particle physics Reply @MAC1978ify 3 years ago (edited) Gravity bubbles - sun magnetic reload ok - world fire sphere magnetic reload ok - moon fire magnetic reload ok 1 Reply @PeeedaPan 3 years ago Fermilab does amazing work Reply @GearsGirlsGuitars 3 years ago Man’s search for the G-spot continues... 5 Reply 2 replies @zackkros7528 3 years ago (edited) I also developed a Advanced Principle, based on my Theorized, Same=Same and Different does not equal Same, Theory! In my Theory, I go over that everything that we know in our Universe has a Positive and Negative Charge. In this, I say, that Nuons make my Point more Clear. They are Magnetic! Which means, that we know now that, that is actually Possible, but, we still have not solved how all these Particles, are transposed in such a way to go Smaller or Larger. In my Theory, everything has a Different Weight, kind-of like a Scale, 1=1 and 2=2, so, each Particle, Atom, or Matter Piece, has a Different Variable Weight! Magnetic Structures and all, meaning if a Atom or Particle, Spins on a Positive and Negative Axis, then, the Weaker Force will Counteract the Stronger, Stronger Pulling More! Stay safe, Seeker! Great Development of Science and Particle Research! Reply @onderozenc4470 3 years ago Pi mesons would give larger deviation in "g" due to their larger mass resulting in larger centrifugal force acting on them during precession. Reply @jordanoutten746 3 years ago Just imagine what else has to be "reworked".. 1 Reply @starsilverinfinity 3 years ago The Universe: So we did alittle trolling 1 Reply @WileHeCoyote 3 years ago Perhaps the celestial dynamo has more effect on the level of the quantum than they are giving credit for? 1 Reply @Dave5843-d9m 3 years ago (edited) Gravity is not really a force. All objects with mass distort time, causing everything to move towards the slowest time. That looks like a force but in reality it’s variable speed of time that does the forcing. 1 Reply 1 reply @HouseofRecordsTacoma 3 years ago Earth, Water, Fire, Air, now a fifth element. Exciting times. 1 Reply @ICEMAN-fp9zn 3 years ago I find this research fascinating 🙂 Reply @af0ulwind115 3 years ago sooner or later they will find out the only difference between the four forces is a matter of perspective on different scales. when you break it down to the smallest interactions possible they will be positive and negative attractions in a lattice of points on equidistant polyhedrons. all other forces are explained by the compound interactions of each point and the charges interacting with them. the larger the particle the more compound the interactions and the more complex the plot graph, but always the same force just viewed on different scales of magnitude. Reply @mohit9374 3 years ago Students: Now I gotta learn more stuff Muons: they see me Rollin they hatin....................... 1 Reply @georgewashington90 3 years ago Muons and positrons may create atom a like structure with opposite charge as known atoms? What would be properties of that? 1 Reply @abdullahunal1108 3 years ago As far as I know standard model doesn't cover gravitational force. 1:03 1 Reply @angelastoneley3246 3 years ago Thought I was just being thick. So excited for what will be found 1 Reply @roadrunner3563 3 years ago But on the same day, was also released a revised calculation that appeared to show that the original and new measurement are in compliance with the revised calculation method Reply @marklawes1859 3 years ago Over optimistic about this. It 'may' be a new discovery but there is much more work to be done and though the statistical significance is fairly high it is not yet compelling. The theory also has an alternate interpretation, less well confirmed than the 'standard' approach, which gives a much closer match. Reply @jdlr369 3 years ago What does this potentially mean for innovation? For example, what kind of inventions could come from this discovery? 1 Reply 1 reply @Nagria2112 3 years ago lol the "Brookhaven Experiment" is a videogame too. hahaha i was i bit confused at first 4 Reply @hacked2123 3 years ago The higgs is causing a time dialation of the muon's subatomic space, resulting in our perception of the moment to be slightly skewed. Reply @Star-Explorers 3 years ago I have to admit they buried that first result pretty well for 20 years. That is because scientists NEVER admit their wrong. Reply @medictaylor 3 years ago this should be all over the news Reply @gratefulot360 3 years ago 😺Mew on 😿Mew off 🙌🏻 Love you channel! 9 Reply @megamanx466 3 years ago Fun fact: Most true science takes about this long to actually get any results that hold up over time. Unfortunately, there's not enough unbiased scientists that are able to scrutinize other scientists' results in a timely manner. This is not to say that all scientific findings are wrong, but that you have to research how those results were derived and be able to trust that they weren't financially motivated to skew the data, as is often when a name-brand product is involved or mentioned. Reply @ldrago2019 3 years ago You guys are late....a lot of channels already dropped videos on this experiment. 3 Reply @gyro5d 3 years ago Everything is Aether's rotating hyperboloid and vortices. e- and muons are different oscillations of their Inertial planes. Reply @baganatube 3 years ago g MINUS two. 2 Reply @atomsk1972 3 years ago TLDR: Particles were acting different than expected and they don't know what it means. They expect that it means something big, but then their incorrect expectations got us here. 9 Reply 2 replies @TomHendricksMusea 3 years ago Look at particle physics as wave physics and that challenges a lot of current physics. Reply @KOLDBLU3ST33L 3 years ago Meanwhile, I still have trouble with the times-tables... 😖 14 Reply 1 reply @tonys3165 3 years ago The E8 model has places for undiscovered particles in it's lattice. I wonder if this new particle fits. Reply @mildsoup8978 3 years ago Perhaps another look at the E8 model? Reply @calderarecords 3 years ago Can someone explain how x200 Heavier = x200 smaller? Am I missing something here? 2 Reply 2 replies @alexsmedile 3 years ago Let's hope it brings us to some physics brakethrough!! 1 Reply @grahamcrakker4751 3 years ago We could spend the rest of eternity attempting to measure infinity. Reply @davidwilkie9551 3 years ago (edited) Black-body resonance hole in Time, with a circumstantial phase state. Toroidal in Spheroidal is 2-1-0 superposition. String Theoretical Calculus analysis is way outside my experience, ask Nima. Reply @Vinnys1805 3 years ago Would be nice to recab all the quantum particles and how they became, and interact Reply @outandabout259 3 years ago Hahaa, it was me all along! I went and poked the muon to mess up the measurements! 2 Reply @zagraniczniak4120 3 years ago There's no such thing as "200 times smaller". 1 Reply @AliHSyed 3 years ago Not technically a "discovery" yet. 10 Reply @cameraderie2328 3 years ago Physics.... Is it possible that one's desire to find a force or particle causes the desire to manifest itself? Just asking... 1 Reply @eileenhalladay7647 3 years ago Perfect timing. Reply @adamchuahzongye395 3 years ago 200 times heavier than eletron so that means 200 times smaller when exposed to magnetic field. Okay, I'm way too stupid for this 3 Reply 2 replies @blackwall619 2 years ago When you all follow yourself you are afraid of disagreement. Reply @guybourassa8437 3 years ago 10 billion gave us 6 new words that decay quickly. Another trillion should give us some long lasting words. Reply @fangugel3812 3 years ago Maybe not. See Urknall Weltal und das Leben - in German - points out that a purely theoretical model of the expected result is far closer to the results observed than the hybrid model (which combines theoretical calculations with measurements and extrapolations of measurements). Still an important result but may be proving that the current theory is correct. Reply @AnimalScienceTV 3 years ago I have no education on this stuff at all. Very interesting! Will it take me years to learn what a muon really is? 2 Reply 2 replies @whoisj 3 years ago Gravity isn't a force, it's a side effect. We don't understand what force creates it very well yet, but we do know that gravity isn't a force. Reply @stephankyle6460 3 years ago We will destroy the earth before we have time to unlock its secrets. 1 Reply @cry2love 3 years ago Scientists Just Discovered a Major “Hole” Me: What color? Reply @ufva8029 3 years ago Imagine if in like 1k or 10k years humans finally gets to understand the truth about the quantum realm, must be trippy to finally know what is there Reply @brucerosner3547 3 years ago In a week there will be 200 theoretical papers explaining this discovery. 1 Reply 1 reply @DavodAta 3 years ago Why you use (background)music when you talk ? 1 Reply @moonlandingagain3228 3 years ago This is how science work moves all the time Reply @tramsgar 3 years ago Oh I know! Just blame it on that magic dark energy as usual. That'll surely explain it. 16 Reply 8 replies @ThomasMaufer 3 years ago Minor correction to a great video: "g-2" is pronounced "gee minus two" 7 Reply 1 reply @futavadumnezo 3 years ago As long as there is an observer we will keep discovering things, practically infinitely. Reply @treborg777 3 years ago The calculated value and the measured value are off by 2.5 x 10^-5 percent. It’s hard to get worked up about new forces or new physics at this small of a discrepancy. Reply @Hiram84 3 years ago Already 2 patents showed concept before this, this is a copy, see info in Hong Kong short term patents: 1193936, 1204522 AN ELECTRICAL ENERGY CREATING DEVICE Reply @portuguesepossum3165 3 years ago Finally an explanation of this from a person who doesn’t use cocaine jazz hands to illustrate their point. 1 Reply 1 reply @justindececco5836 3 years ago Just think in like 100 years we find out there's even smaller & smaller "particles"...& at the same time find the universe is bigger & bigger...the cycle continues through the generations as long as the technology advances. Reply @raffaelevalente7811 3 years ago 2:00 THIS is the actual Italian accent and not the stereotypical "It's me, Mario!" :) 1 Reply 3 replies @eugenecbell 3 years ago I’m relieved we are still finding new things in the quantum area. Reply @bobgreen9897 3 years ago Why did it take 20 years to repeat experiment? 1 Reply @timothy8426 3 years ago Space itself is particles. Energy transference is a ongoing reaction to motion of force. Spiraling energy transference gives frequencies. Even light. Our senses only pick up five resistances. We can only imagine the total picture of the unknown. We are limited to five senses and imagination. All known particles and instances are differentially separated by motion and place. No two are exactly the same. Everything is unique, and connected, and in constant motion. Dimensions are the result of being a part of observable motion and force interaction. Size is only relevant to self awareness. Reply @tedlis517 3 years ago Sloppy. Not claimed as a discovery until 5 sigma “confidence”. Brookhaven’s result wasn’t 3 SD away from theory; BH was able to demonstrate 99.98% confidence level or 3.7 sigma in its experimental result. With Fermi Lab’s data the confidence in the discrepancy between theory and result is 4.2 sigma. And, the experiment is “g minus two” not “g two.” 3 Reply 1 reply @harendragurjar7765 3 years ago Is it G2 experiment or G minus 2 experiment?? I think it's second one , what you guys think 4 Reply 5 replies @dilibau 3 years ago They finally discovered the G spot for muons! 4 Reply @RSEFX 3 years ago Muons are 200 x heavier than electrons. When they become magnetized they become 200 x smaller (than electrons?---or 200x smaller than they themselves are?). Need some explanations/clarifications. What is the explanation for the "magnetized----> size reduction" thing? Seems like a bit of an explanation as to how that comes about is just glossed over/is missing. Am not a physicist. Can someone connect the dots for me? Am needing clarification. Thanks! Reply @smithaust7351 3 years ago The Problem with the (non)standard model is it deviates with the experiment always. And then they make hurry burry corrections. 1 Reply 1 reply @Tripplezonebech 3 years ago I think muons is the first step for us to understand how to harness the energy of the vacuum therefor we become closer to be a galactic civilization it’s like knowing the Zero point energy so we can control gravity Reply 1 reply @michaelbathurst7871 3 years ago Muons combined with graviton acceleration will be interesting Reply 1 reply @enlongchiou 3 years ago weak force from (pm/me)^2=3.14/(128.398*A*137.036)=(1836.152)^2 deduce 1/(1836.152)^2/137.036=0.0000000021 can tell difference. Reply @alparslankorkmaz2964 3 years ago Nice video. 1 Reply @theodoremacewko7757 3 years ago "tsar feodore IV": I suggest the following : You don't have quantum physics and regular physics.you have only one physics uni-physics.you have atoms circling semi- black holes ( no such thing black holes ) getting closer and closer spinning faster and faster approaching the speed of light (? and faster) losing heat energy starting to superconduct creating anti- gravity. You have no extra mass in the universe. Anti-gravity do two things it push galaxies away from each other and ironically since anti- gravity from various galaxies push on our galaxy from all directions it anti-gravity that hold our galaxy together without the need for additional mass. Do anti-gravity explain the orbit of mercury within neuton's physics ( in other words gravity not a "curvature of space . Assuming certain things I nicholai tesla's decendent . Reply @ConquerYou 3 years ago When my girlfriend hits her Magnetic Moment, we also call it the G Factor. Small world, go figure. 2 Reply @sergioin3D 3 years ago How crazy that these tiny tiny unseeable things decay into other things Reply @Electrontm 3 years ago I think my cat knows a lot about meowons too 1 Reply @markware1955 3 years ago This might explain the series finale to "Lost"... Reply @divinewind7405 3 years ago (edited) 🔬💥Imagine Beaker from the muppets working there...🔬💥 Reply @dr.ddavid3496 3 years ago teacher: sigh ok student cancel out atoms and put in mutoms class: but Sir why teacher: cause that joy of science you should be grateful class:... Reply @Mostafa-jf4nr 3 years ago Should we discard schrodinger equation Reply @fritzheini9867 3 years ago you missed the higgs boson in the standard model Reply @hansolowe19 3 years ago Could both experiments be wrong in mostly the same way? Reply @zarifchowdhury1468 3 years ago Damn understood everything 😢 1 Reply @danielash1704 3 years ago I think we should send test lenders out to the van Allen belt the see background information about this Earthly story of frequencies and waves of gravity from outer outer space. Reply @JohnAudioTech 3 years ago Uhh. Never mind. Someone spilled a Coke on the control panel. Reply @philipross3568 3 years ago They figured out how to reverse engineering the ufo they found Reply @jonathanhorton4607 3 years ago This is why Nassim Heramien is the future Reply @michaelmasters5217 3 years ago The powers of 3,6,& 9 are not fully understood yet. Once understood we will set are mark in the universe Reply @arlanreber6717 3 years ago Y’all can use my 85 DMC DeLorean. Just fill the gas tank and watch the re-entry. And lock the doors. There’s a Biff in every time line people. 1 Reply @אליאלבן-דן 3 years ago “They’ll stumble on some answers.” What?!?! Reply @mr.v6771 3 years ago Concepts such as Love, Life, Death etc are also major hole in Science. Reply @jawanngillis6397 3 years ago Yall notice how its not trending? Is anybody wondering what those muons are? I've been on a spiritual journey recently and I've literally see those muons with my own eyes. You wanna know about muons? Take some time and think about how the universe works and everything science has proven but STILL can't explain...The direct split of science and religion should make yall think....The deeper you get you can literally feel and know science and the spiritual plane go hand and hand. Start with questioning your thoughts what are you actually thinking about? Find a way to look deeper within yourselves and connect with your soul and connect to the LITERAL grass of the earth and MEDITATE and OPEN YOUR MINDS! Its around us 24/7 yall we literally don't see it until you open your mind that third eye all this spiritual stuff is not a joke and its been in our faces the whole time. Center yourself and work on meditating finding that balance of calm and focus and whatever is causing you pain in life LET IT GO! It ALWAYS gets deeper! Reply @dannyteebone9233 3 years ago Those guys are gonna F sumthin up big time Reply @michaelmcardle4096 3 years ago It will change again. Universe like our plant changes all the time. Reply @thatcanadian6698 3 years ago I think Dr. Manhattan is just screwing with our heads. Reply @Ripkittymi 3 years ago Maybe we can revolutionize the way we understand these UAP flies. Reply @seancollins9745 3 years ago food for thought, what if, all of particle physics, is built on a incorrect theory. 1 Reply 2 replies @LEARSIKCIGAM 3 years ago the headline should be - scientists find Another hole in the standard model Reply @identity_redacted 3 years ago 1:11 It's Strong *Nuclear and Weak *Nuclear Forces 4 Reply @hongkongbeat2164 3 years ago I'm sure it can all be explained. Eddies in the space time continuum. Reply @ovaisreyaz4858 3 years ago Engineer: Approximate its g factor to be 3 Reply @abhinavkumar6504 3 years ago Oh no, It means I have to study whole physics again ! Reply @div4374 3 years ago They do not spin, it's just a property, they do not physically spin Reply @bpri9880 3 years ago I say if there’s a hole we need to put something in it...actually that pretty much sums up all the actions in the universe. Fill the hole. Reply @domanit927 3 years ago maybe the universe is vibrating and muons are getting stable by the particle field?who knows Reply @RikoJAmado 3 years ago (edited) The host looks and sounds familiar. Did she come from Scishow or PBS Digital Studio? Reply @debbiehanisch2099 3 years ago So what does this mean for energy and humanity? Reply @darylh8657 3 years ago The fundamental purpose of Science: Find the Muon's G-spot. Reply @specialist0147 3 years ago I wonder how this will change physics? I think about all the students learning classical and quantum physics and how this will change quantum physics. Reply @kirkc9643 3 years ago "Just discovered" 20 years ago. New experiment supports previous findings Reply @chriswillis6607 3 years ago Iv seen a video of stars having a wobble .When they have planets are orbiting them. Reply @mohammedaamish3336 3 years ago I’d like to know the background track used. Thanks. Reply @bays19 3 years ago Maybe the 5th force will give us knowledge how to govern the 4th more efficiently and effectively. Reply @Abmotsad 3 years ago Who wants to bet that this discovery will NOT, in fact, require our current understanding of the universe to be "entirely reworked". Reply 2 replies @nukeout 3 years ago Hope this lets us enable that cheat code of invincibility like in Doom Reply @justinpyle3415 3 years ago Did you calculate the pptential of quantized inertia accounting for the difference in the magnetic moment??? arent these particles moving at relativistic speeds with mass? Reply @Imperfect5252 3 years ago Does that means electron doesnt revolve around nucleus ? Reply @jobirdmanbom7585 3 years ago Gravity isn’t a force , it’s a effect due the warping of space time 3 Reply 1 reply @kineticstar 3 years ago Does this mean my physics book is out of date? I'm not buying another one until I can get an answer around 2M^3 6 Reply 1 reply @andrewsparkinson1566 3 years ago As a particle is Accelerated from point through point artificially, the wobble is just the two dimensional expression of the ‘spiralling motion’ a particle experiences under the influence of the environmental relative gravity. Reply @theganjaengineers3594 3 years ago Time dilation would effect the Factor. Is it being accounted for. Reply @thomasjones1496 3 years ago News break, Scientists just woke up. Thunderboltsproject Reply @unaphiliated5090 3 years ago All that physics that I didn't understand is a do-over, to be replaced by a bunch of new physics that I won't understand. 1 Reply 1 reply @joifashion8355 3 years ago Physicists are underrated Reply @bray2083 3 years ago It looks like a portal 1 Reply @Psyhohm 3 years ago Looks like we will be making a stargate soon. Reply @smoking_skeletor5193 3 years ago why in spite of having 200 times more mass in muons, electrons were discovered first? Reply @fettmaneiii4439 3 years ago I wobble when my G factor has a magnetic moment too. 1 Reply 1 reply @mildsoup8978 3 years ago How is the muon magnetic moment smaller than an electron if it's bigger than an electron? Reply @janhemmer8181 3 years ago What kind of graph is this? Only one axis is specified... Reply @bernardwhipps7558 3 years ago Muon’s spin like a top? Is that a simplification? Reply @gameglitcher 3 years ago (edited) 1N = (1Kg)(m/s)(1/s) divide out the (m/s) 1Ns/m = (1Kg/s) invert everything 1m/Ns = (1s/Kg) if this is correct.. distance is hindered by momentum(Relativity) equivalently to how time is hindered by mass. Gravity is the resistance to change in time across some distance. Gravity may well be a strong force we do not see the full effect of. I believe quantum physics are probability based because there is something we do not understand that would allow us to pull out the uncertainty. The problem with everyone jumping on the same bandwagon of scientific advancement propagated by the mass availability of information is we lost the self inspired interests that would or could have led to the next Einstein or Tesla, et al. Now we end up at the point we are staring at a wall of decades of work going 'where did this go wrong?'. There is an inherent difference in being wrong and being told you're wrong as the reveled few in history could tell you. The best thing that could be done is to leave it at how the math works, let everyone fill in the threads as to why the math works. Time to wait and see if anyone with the ability to understand the implications of this reads it. Reply 2 replies @bryghian 3 years ago This is awesome Reply @yondel-kttkoh3948 3 years ago Once they figure everything out next step is how to make this a weapon, just like everything else. Reply @Bruno_Haible 3 years ago 2:40 "Instead of finding a g-factor slightly above 2 as the Standard Model have predicted, they found a g-factor that was off by nearly 3 standard deviations." Whoever formulated this sentence understands zero about physics and statistics. Reply 1 reply @gwco.8227 3 years ago Muons reminds me off gravity in space. Any thoughts what I mean about it ? Reply @OriginalThisAndThat 3 years ago In two years they be like "antigravity" Reply @nschulz5698 3 years ago damn, gonna need a new particle physics t shirt Reply @Destan-jp5zu 3 years ago A major hole? you mean add it to the pile of major holes lol Reply @keithandnatani7849 3 years ago Can muons attract positive charges from water Reply @Forgan_Mreeman 3 years ago my brain don’t work no more Reply @rexdalit3504 3 years ago This is definitely NOT an independent experiment If Fermilab is using the same ring magnet as Brookhaven. Where are your wits, Fermilab? Regardless of how this goes, it's too bad Schwinger isn't alive to see the results. Reply @dankdreamz8956 3 years ago Muons that are negatively charged go against gravitational fields. simple. Reply @phreewill 3 years ago Problem is we are measuring too much. probability is what will get us there. Reply @ryanschram7266 3 years ago Why don’t they make a muon generator and apply that to the warp engine they’re trying to build. Reply @ian_b 3 years ago The Strong Force isn't fundamental, it's just the Van Der Waals forces from the Colour Force between quarks. Reply 1 reply @markphc99 3 years ago (edited) A nice video but rather late , the muon g-2 findings were released over a week ago, also you didn't mention the new BMW calculation which is much nearer the fermilab result 1 Reply 1 reply @bashvim 3 years ago Yeah.. cats are so unpredictable. That's why Mewons are so difficult! Reply @rafaelmaia8829 3 years ago What name this new force will have? Reply @thatemeraldphotographer6003 3 years ago (edited) Muon gettin his goove on Reply @Meta369 3 years ago Its a funny thing , humans spending a life time a billions of dollars studying projected images reflected into a moisture atmosphere. Reply @showarth4025 3 years ago In short, Richard Dean Anderson built a “Stargate”? Reply @JamesSCavenaugh 3 years ago If gravity isn't a force (and it isn't in general relativity), why list it as one of 4 fundamental forces? Reply @Bit-while_going 3 years ago Somewhere, somebody ate some popcorn. Reply @wolfisraging 3 years ago I'm impressed by the actual discovery, but I'm much more and heavily impressed by the fact that they are not considering that small.. negligible error that they got between theoretical and practical values as the human/machinery error. 1 Reply 1 reply @TheGroundedCoffee 3 years ago Ah yes, the mythical g-factor achieved by exciting the elusive g-partical. Reply @C0MPLEXITY 3 years ago our theories and approximations can't encompass everything, that's something we all agree from the inside. Reply @ioresult 3 years ago It's the "gee minus two" experiment. Not the "gee two". Reply @אופלהסמן 3 years ago Well, stert thinking again what is a body and what is a hole, since black is IR or x-ray but both are radiating... Reply @adheeshb8874 3 years ago All we know , is that there's more that we don't know. Reply @Hamsteren91 3 years ago Why were your standard model missing the Higs boson? Just curious🖐 Reply 1 reply @cyruskalali8222 3 years ago Muons are 200 time bigger but 200 times weaker? Are you sure about what you said Ms. Reply @generouslyricism519 3 years ago you can see internet it self if you have special glasses Reply @spacemanspiff2137 3 years ago Another team of scientists recently produced theoretical results that agree with the measurements. It’s not looking too promising for the discovery of new physics Reply @positiveit-teatea1806 3 years ago What does it all mean basil?? Reply @raedwulf61 3 years ago I thought science was settled.... Somebody's been lying. Reply @davidy87 3 years ago There's a hole everywhere yet nowhere- blackhole Reply @chademery7119 3 years ago To please a physicist, you have to find the G-factor. Reply @KC9UDX 3 years ago You mean the established standard model of the universe is wrong? Oh, shocking. (Sarcasm) Reply @pROXYHOX 3 years ago DANGER! Reply @weerobot 3 years ago Our knowlendge has more Holes Than Cheese... Reply @bowantoia8536 3 years ago Like looking for cats and dogs and a dragon drops out the sky🤣 Reply @oceandrop7666 3 years ago I wonder how far human knowledge is from complete knowledge. Are we 1% there, 50%? Who knows. My guess is the fundamental nature of all reality is so wildly strange that we're not anywhere close. Reply @andywalkerplumber 3 years ago They shouldn’t have settled for the standard model. — the deluxe model is a little better Reply @Infamous_B_C 3 years ago And we just destroyed microscopic civilizations Reply @reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 3 years ago How not to confuse mewons with mooons. Mewons are catlike particles. Mooons are cowlike particles. Reply @generouslyricism519 3 years ago maybe some kind of kinetic force like in black punter movie or weather builder Reply @vittorio4866 3 years ago The problem is that the relativity theory is not completely accepted Reply @YarUnderoaker 2 years ago What about Tau g-factor? Reply @wisdomcompassion5060 3 years ago All is game of electromagnetic. Reply @closer4214 3 years ago This is a pretty cool music video Reply @keppela1 3 years ago "Just"? You mean like 2 weeks ago? : ) Reply @br2266 3 years ago I've been searching for my girlfriend's g factor for a while now too :( 12 Reply 2 replies @wolfisraging 3 years ago I know the ans.. its dark matter. 1 Reply @mircea1233 3 years ago I still hope one of those discoveries will lead to some sort of FTL. Reply @mar_-oy1lc 3 years ago I just want to see a warpdrive Reply @stevenpritchard3519 3 years ago Does a muon have a single pole ? Reply @markshiman5690 3 years ago This experiment simply replicated the results of a 2001 experiment with slightly higher precision, she says this very clearly... why lie in the title? :/ Reply @phonehamster6065 3 years ago I guess it is there are 2 muon in a photon, from wave and energy there are connected in the square image of the photon. It make the photon spin but not seperated the energy the muon is compress. I think it is the aspect of light that can send a signial whit a pyramid structure. Reply @vulcan4d 3 years ago (edited) New type of physics or we don't know physics. 1 Reply @scottkaiser6912 3 years ago must be what i see lightheaded sometimes swirling dots in circles couldve figured those out Reply @pakde8002 3 years ago Another YouTube title proving that people who write youtube titles don't know jack about this subject or physics in general. Reply @god_damn9661 3 years ago well...it is 2 weeks now... Reply @GJohnson1981 3 years ago Just keep updating that universal operating system... Reply @kiwimenz 3 years ago Where’s Einstein when you need him Reply @stucheluchin4702 3 years ago wait till they figure out what spin is Reply @-WhizzBang- 3 years ago They are still searching for the "G Factor", kind of like how they are still searching for the "G-Spot"...... LMAO 2 Reply @sussify436 3 years ago I understand what this is though. I'm actually happy now !!!! Reply @karabomothupi9759 3 years ago First experimental confirmation of string theory. Reply @technomage6736 3 years ago I thought it was already well known that we were still missing some pieces 🤷‍♂️ Reply @tomlee2651 3 years ago It's a loaded ring. Reply @nbdd0121 3 years ago The standard model doesn't account for gravitational force. Reply @ratneshkumar1512 3 years ago Muons...... new Pokemon Reply @bartardo1 3 years ago So thats how UFO'S fly then?.?...? Reply @truejim 3 years ago As an aside: I think Amanda should throttle back slightly on her use of “narrator voice”. I often listen to these videos while doing something else, and it seems like “narrator voice” is getting thicker, which to me makes it harder to follow, not easier. 1 Reply @earthplusplastics 3 years ago They should just figure out the laws of universe before its too late Reply @crspy914 3 years ago i love it when my muons wobble Reply @KARTHIK5555ful 3 years ago So, this is what gives Antman his power! Reply @challenger2ultralightadventure 3 years ago They are searching for the level of the "g" spot? Darn hardest thing to find if you ask anyone. Reply @BatkoNashBandera774 3 years ago (edited) I still feel most people not in the field might mistake process and goal of the experiment, by the way its named. Not as strange as the strange quark ;), but yeah. Also, if we measure more precise by another magnitude of 1000... will we see the string vibrations ;) 2 Reply 1 reply @jaybingham3711 3 years ago Is the universe going to be disappointed if we can't find the g-spot of the g-factor? Reply @AmorrSummerstorm 3 years ago Im so dumb 1 Reply @patriciareid437 3 years ago so maybe this accounts for the missing (dark) mass causing the gravitational force that we assign to dark matter, and explains dark energy. I figured it was just a very basic misunderstanding of particle physics. Reply @MrScruffyft 3 years ago What has humanity benefited from this research thus far? Reply @akanjisekoni 3 years ago Finally Unlocking More Mysteries Of Phy-si-cs Sci-en-ce, Can't wait until scientists learn more and give me superpowers, I'm tired of being Quirkless (Powerless) 6 Reply 1 reply @TrashPanda71 3 years ago Looking for a mini G-Spot hahaha Reply @sprootown 3 years ago ...it is totally possible to accelerate the half life decay of nuclear material and wastes. Reply @thembamoloi583 3 years ago (edited) Damn 2:41 really hit home, absolutely no person of color whatsoever. We still have a long way to go as a nation ✊🏾 But anyway I'm thrilled by this😁 Reply @nicksundby 3 years ago Surely there's a muon app the scientists can get Reply @grproteus 3 years ago When you say "just", you mean last week? Reply @tinycnyc 3 years ago That's why I believe that cartoons are real I believe anything is possible Reply @Kane-ib5sn 2 months ago great job of explaining things at the most basic level...basically nobody knows anything... Reply @davidconjefferson 3 years ago But What can you do with it? Reply @Curas1 3 years ago whatever it is...it needs more research funding. that we are sure of. 2 Reply 3 replies @carlmay2280 3 years ago A 1930s genius described physics as a function of suction and pressure, and zig zag and swirl. I know what gravity is. But I won't tell you. Reply @RichardMeikle 3 years ago So exciting Reply @vCuda 3 years ago Physics reform! Reply @jeffreykalb9752 3 years ago Oh, great. Now they'll ask for even more money to build an even larger collider. And we can be told all the wonderful things they are doing with our money. Reply @xxACIDVIRUSxx 3 years ago Where do they come out this ...ons names🤔 Reply @Dr7Mac 3 years ago I wonder what Sabine Hossenfelder has to say about all of this. Reply @1-_-M00g-_-1 3 years ago Then comes the mewtew-on. Reply @jamricsloe 3 years ago We need money to study something that May have not been discovered...maybe. Reply @miketype1each 3 years ago So, those muons are doing the unexpected, eh? Muh homies! Reply @varunchaudhary96 3 years ago We are talking about force and quantum realm here, we need Yoda and Hank Pym to explain this. Reply @onerichartist 3 years ago Great article. Great voice. Go easy with the fry. Reply @generouslyricism519 3 years ago TIME MASHINE OR NEW ENERGY SOURCE Reply @dharmverma7595 3 years ago Why do you all keep on calling these things particles when they are not? Reply @mikhailstepounin9448 3 years ago First, scientists should provide photographs of the Earth from "outer space". As of today we have none. CGI. Reply @fyrerayne8882 3 years ago congrats Reply @astralascendance 3 years ago "Hole" Reply @klusenschmiedmike5157 3 years ago "What we know is a drop. What we don´t know is an ocean!" Sir Isaac Newton Reply @aaronweatherson4379 3 years ago ...the inside is bigger than the outside... Reply @oOZanlanOo 3 years ago How could it be so major? Reply @kcovert3 3 years ago The fifth force to the rescue! Reply @ubanicorn 3 years ago I just am sorry for newer science students 2 Reply 2 replies @SB_3.1415 3 years ago do muons spin like a top?? 1 Reply 3 replies @georgeshotrodbarn2113 3 years ago You have a nice voice Reply @nicolasribeiro7914 3 years ago can we have an F in the chat for the people that are still getting a degree in quantum phisics? Reply @skellingtonmeteoryballoon 3 years ago This like star wars stuff 😂🤣😂🤣😂 Reply @trexkiro9200 3 years ago so what? can i eat that? Reply @adambromley6972 3 years ago Those “four forces” and the “standard model” looks like a bunch of nonsense? I mean wtf is strong weak gravitational and electromagnetic have to do with each other? They are all forces but are they even different and why would you categorize them like this? If I push something that’s a force too? There’s “mental” forces that weigh on people. And is electromagnetic different than gravitational? Is gravity not electric? So wouldn’t that mean there’s 2 main forces- gravity and electric? If so why the weak and strong.. those wouldn’t be a “type” of force but just a measurement of a force. And I can’t even begin to ask questions about the “standard” model. I understand these are very smart people but sometimes I wonder if they are going too deep into one thing, I feel like a step back needs to be taken because really what does any of this mean? Physics hasn’t been so complicated in the past and naturally things should make sense pretty easily so I really don’t understand who is over complicating things or how i can start to understand what this means Reply @infinitumneo840 3 years ago Quantum Electro Dynamics is an amazingly accurate theory. This could be evidence of dark matter or a fifth fundamental force interactions. We are seeing new physics here. 1 Reply 1 reply @KootFloris 3 years ago Scientists look for the forest. They watch individual trees and hope through that to find how the whole forest operates. Of course, they don't find any rule that always holds. Like a living forest, there are principles each influencing others, to create a whole (living?) system. 1 Reply @namernum5692 3 years ago Точность не увеличилась, прибор тот же, зато выбили зараплату на 3 года Reply @nun_bel_eever 3 years ago What? Scientists admit they don't understand what they have been advocating since the reformation. Hmmm. So we really don't understand our reality as much as we think we do... Back to the drawing board... Them creationists are gonna have a heyday... Reply @arnoldskit 3 years ago Ok, so what does it all boil down to? What will it give us ? Free energy ? i need a answer... Reply 1 reply @isaakloewen5172 3 years ago ‘Just discovered’ 20 years ago smh Reply @mydayswithoutyou 3 years ago C'mon. Do the calculation again, and you'll find that there is no disagreement between experimental results and theory. Reply @spiritinflux 3 years ago magic Reply @royhi1809 2 years ago WE are NOT ALONE. Reply @wulphstein 3 years ago Like a banker being off by a penny. Reply @aptitudexfood 3 years ago This is a very interesting topic. I think that dark matter might have something to do with it 1 Reply 2 replies @dylanlawhorn5309 3 years ago We live in a game of sims.. Reply @HeyYou-wq2sv 3 years ago I am sure military fervor for dominance and military activities contributed to the electromagnetic pollution. Reply @roger_is_red 3 years ago wow Reply @tyronekerr8622 3 years ago There are no particles. Just geometry in the quantum field. 'If you want to know the secrets of the universe, think energy, frequency and vibration'. Nikola Tesla Reply @andrewball1168 3 years ago How do people figure this out Reply 1 reply @RNG-999 3 years ago That's one sexy librarian Reply @livingcorpse5664 3 years ago I don't want to rain on everyone's parade but wasn't it proven it was faulty equipment or the scientist goofed up procedure? Reply @logicrules3697 3 years ago Keep looking. What's after muon. Pion. What's after Pion? Lots of decay. You're going the wrong way! Reply @EternalMinimalist 3 years ago How did I get here. I was watching cake boss. Reply @Systox25 3 years ago The measurement isn’t accurate enough for the scientists to call this a discovery But they are close Reply @balfourwheatley6644 3 years ago Ahh back to square one Reply @devsaran5024 3 years ago 5th force of nature? Reply @xentaatnex8261 3 years ago I have a feeling that humanity will at one day go instinct without knowing 100% how the universe works. 2 Reply 1 reply @80sday36 3 years ago Suddenly l feel dumb.. Ouwh muonron Reply @TEE19622 3 years ago Do scientists stop investigating when an agreeable theory is found? "Oh look how closely it matches, we've done it boys" Reply @txsla 3 years ago (edited) as much as this is exciting, of course theres particles we dont know about, of course there are dimensions and particles our bodies cant sense with any of our human senses. of course there will be things we are wrong about science and of course there will be things that we will never know the answer to. Reply @dennisk2194 3 years ago i've no clue of what this whole video is tailking about Reply @danielgreenaway1587 3 years ago GEM Reply @kennedya7848 3 years ago complete the sentence: major hole calls for major _____. Reply 1 reply @mk3ferret 3 years ago Just tell us the progress on the "singularly engine".... Reply @defiance5214 3 years ago Let’s just admit it people scientists and physicists have almost no idea what going on in the universe and and are ether guessing or worse lying Reply @janetlang9031 3 years ago Awesome, I love science: "Wert thou to speed through the immensity of space and traverse the expanse of heaven, yet thou wouldst find no rest save in submission to Our command and humbleness before Our Face." – Baha’u’llah, The Hidden Words, p. 13. Reply @johna.favata5909 3 years ago I find science muonderful. Reply @infinity.1111 3 years ago gotta love "science"... always proving itself completely wrong Reply @michaelgeisdorf6641 3 years ago (edited) Interesting this failed path to truth. I’m seeing the routinely failed “standard cosmological model” slowly but inexorably sliding toward many of the principles of the electric/plasma universe. Troubled in many rights on its own, through experiment and trial and error, both models are moving TOWARD each other. Great things await humanity when the models merge and we sail the cosmos once again. Reply @dr.catherineelizabethhalse1820 3 years ago That’s hot Reply @prernamadan_25 3 years ago Wow😯😯 interesting.... Reply @superposition 3 years ago I see 1 Reply @SpaceMonkey033 3 years ago 5:17 imagine if they solved the Standard Model thanks to a YT comment section 2 Reply @kennethwallace21 3 years ago Aliens Reply @phantomedgedamascus2388 3 years ago maybe muon can be an exotic matter 😁 Reply @deutschchad1399 3 years ago Could these new particles be related to dark matter? Reply @zombiefeast1.039 3 years ago All this is to keep the money train going. James Webb is a perfect example. Reply @machickenjoy3202 3 years ago Muons be like: im unlike those inferior particles 2 Reply @roemblanco3158 3 years ago There are no such things as “particles”. It implies they are round and little dots. In reality these “particles” are energy fields with distinct properties. Everything is made of energy, matter IS energy. You are energy. Materialism is the basis to explain the universe but it is misleading our understanding. Reply @badhrihari1705 3 years ago I heard it as "elons" Reply @Benjamin-pw6nw 3 years ago I don’t understand will we see our love one Reply @sopek1427 3 years ago I have no idea what i watched Reply @tientruong 3 years ago damn sophons Reply @hellcat1988 3 years ago (edited) 5 years from now, this research leads to anti-grav, and Elon has an absolute fit cause the Starship is made totally obsolete. Reply @laserus3333 3 years ago Yet Science still doesn't understand why it is we need to sleep. Or have yet to dig a hole any deeper then 8 miles. Or acknowledged simple math (8 inches per mile squared ) line of sight the earth is not a 24000 mile sphere. Lets measure the size of an ego shall we. Reply @laserus3333 3 years ago Yet Science still doesn't understand why it is we need to sleep. Or have yet to dig a hole any deeper then 8 miles. Or acknowledged simple math (8 inches per mile squared ) line of sight the earth is not a 24000 mile sphere. Lets measure the size of an ego shall we. Reply @MrQuickPro 3 years ago y not moveons rather.. Reply @dipupaul3908 3 years ago This physics girl is prettier than Muon ... Reply @zhyrille1956 3 years ago Jarvis Give me my Core Reply @westhyphy 3 years ago Love it 1 Reply @bartardo1 3 years ago Muon drive Reply @erniesulovic4734 3 years ago Go back and study Tesla. He knew better then than what we know now.... Reply @SuperKingslaw 3 years ago Turtles all the way down..... Reply @e8root 3 years ago Black holes. I see black holes everywhere :) Reply @liamwrightgittins6472 3 years ago I wish Stephen Hawking had lived long enough to find out. 5 Reply 2 replies @monasalman6625 3 years ago سبحان ألله 2 Reply @FruitingPlanet 3 years ago Calm your horses, yes the g-2 experiment results are intresting, but they don´t nessesarily mean "new physics" like many allready claim, it is very possible that the approximation we use in the standard model was just a bit off due to the value being partially taken from experimental results, if you use the most recent value for g-2 that has been calculated with mathematical models by supercomputers, it is much closer to the result of these experiments then the one we use in the standard model. Reply @DanielNistrean 3 years ago THE TIME HAS COME! PREPARE YOUR PAPERS! Reply @anthonyb8994 3 years ago I'm still waiting for the antigravity technology to be revealed. 1 Reply @gouravsalla 3 years ago Get ready standard model, u r going to get updates soon 😂 Reply @self-aware5825 3 years ago I enjoy seeing videos that encourage critical thinking thanks 1 Reply @ngtony2969 3 years ago wasn't this debunked already? yesterday they said it was equipment inaccuracy Reply 1 reply @adombarrett8998 3 years ago Gravitonssss Reply @justinupshaw672 3 years ago Maybe stop making laws in terms of physics use them as a guide instead of being limited or held back by the standard definition of "law". Reply @GaganKP 3 years ago Loophole or a Hole ? Reply 1 reply @WintJames 3 years ago You start the video off by showing cartoons lmao I already know how this video ends because the earth is Flat & Stationary. Have a nice day goons! Reply @deetrixreed8961 3 years ago So we have no clue what it means and someone got lucky enough to find it. Meh. Update me when it matters please. This was....ok at best. Reply @thereseclaire9806 3 years ago Angels and Demons coming to life Reply @blindedbliss 3 years ago Dark Energy Reply @jodscience3741 3 years ago The Standard Model is flawed. It has too many fixes. Reply @PieterPatrick 3 years ago Great video! ...Only to short. :-) 1 Reply @asairohit1 3 years ago Looks like the half life lab Reply @vrillx 3 years ago I see them when im high Reply @handsomeblackmuscle9845 3 years ago S c I e N c E 1 Reply 1 reply @drkrypton4410 3 years ago SG1 Reply @ZergRadio 3 years ago Muon = Meowwwww, meowwwwww Reply @elbaecc 3 years ago Sometimes the lady speaks a little too softly. Reply @Bultizar 3 years ago negative force (come on baby, pappy needs dem flying cars) 1 Reply @agmjfcom 3 years ago As an Aussie, I want the new force called “dark vegemite”. 1 Reply @therealKINDLE 3 years ago LOL! Reminds me of when years ago I was the only one in the room who laughed when a scientist called Dr Who "You Stupid Quark!" in the Claws of Axos! ha ha! But this? This is very exciting. This will change the game. And possibly reveal much needed information about how our universe is structured. 1 Reply @Timfamy 3 years ago With the accelerater thay borrowed of Tony stark Reply @hhyy3173 3 years ago Thoughts create reality. ❤️ Reply @AngryKittens 3 years ago Maybe it's the stongest force in the universe... ... L️VE! The real magnetic moment was the friends we made along the way! 2 Reply @metatechnocrat 3 years ago Scientific witchery I tell you! Reply @hannahmore9118 3 years ago (edited) Well, duh. Theories are just that, theories, not fact, yet. Reply @kathanshah8305 3 years ago F 1 Reply @sharmabhay5001 3 years ago I like these videos.... Reply @xrlabs 3 years ago This is just sensationalism. This has already been debunked Reply @bh2020_ 3 years ago There's just one thing about this video that is annoying to the nth degree. So much use of UPTALK that makes every other sentence sound like a question and not a statement. What's really happening is that women are imitating Valley Girl talk. Every video you watch has people using uptalk that takes credibility away from a person's speech. Do a search on: 1. What is Uptalk? 2. "1982 Throwback: Valley Girls" 3. How to talk like a Valley Girl 4. Speaking skills for women: Do you talk like a Valley Girl? Imagine if Martin Luther King said: I have a dream? My children will not be judged by the color of their skin? But of the content of their character? That's ridiculous. Reply @haribo836 3 years ago Something that explains it and it's out there in the universe? Aliens, must be aliens 1 Reply @Shadow__X 3 years ago Aka: Monday Reply @virtuous8 3 years ago job security Reply @addisondraper3574 3 years ago What a bummer for all the physicists who thought they knew what they were talking about. Specifically, all the smug arrogant fools who just look like a bunch of idiots now, I'm sure it will be fine though. They will probably act ; like they are happy about the new discovery because it really just adds something new to everything else they know about the universe. Then they will show no humility in the face of their own ignorance and eventually I will get to enjoy a moment like this all over again when they finally figure out that string theory is a dead end mistake that they have to abandon because it won't explain all the things they want it to. I can't wait to hear Neil Tyson on TV tell the world he was wrong this whole time! Science can be really fun sometimes! Reply @xyzct 3 years ago Let me guess: you want more funding. Reply @georgehallamalltreedup5346 3 years ago It's the universe it's self ......u can thank me later....lmao...smfh Reply @lonelybud 3 years ago Actually there are lot of stuffs that are not fundamentally explained. How actually newtons law of equal and opposite reaction works under the hood of universe is what I Imagine sometime. Nobody cares uhn. Scientists just define it as law with mathematics but no one curious how its work. We are living in a world so much complicated. Better lot of people work together and understand fundamentally, logically as a new born human with curiosity. The probability will shift more towards success if we keep on arguing until the current generation agrees on the previous gen works. I always new the science is broken even its beautiful. It has to be magnificent beyond and its time we revise all the things that are not explained fundamentally. Think of this for example what if when two balls collide there is an instaneous action faster than speed of light. Reply @jimbones155 3 years ago Sounds like an admission that the Electric Universe's model is correct and the standard model is full of math-magic and gobbledegook. 1 Reply 2 replies @iamkaus 3 years ago Looking for the G-spot! Oops, I mean G-factor. 😜 1 Reply 1 reply @solver55 3 years ago i heard Elon untill i saw the video. Reply @butterchuggins5409 3 years ago Shiz gettin real weird Reply @georgehallamalltreedup5346 3 years ago Vacume not vaccine. Reply @o-wolf 3 years ago Oops: the theory Reply @mvmv-pn8zt 3 years ago Humans don’t fully understand the universe shock... ummm.... we are truly in the age of stupid.... just the facts Jack without the dumb statements Reply @hebegebes1785 3 years ago muons-- the next explore into the creator 1 Reply @maemilev 3 years ago I will definitely not let my kids learn this bullshit! 1 Reply @falconflylow 3 years ago It would be very great, if someone could research how much milions of bilions dollars went into space and phisycs research from 1950 now on, and what actualy mankind have from it. (benefits) Like nuclear power exploiting.... Reply @elqsabe1 3 years ago String theory confirmed ! Reply 1 reply @dilligaf700 3 years ago All that money all those years for what a spinning top what is the over all purpose for all the effort ? What use is it to the average person ? Reply @techopensource2954 3 years ago Video is late but ok Reply @zukacs 3 years ago i love this world, life is amazing. too bad we are in the stone age of electricity, 99% of interesting disxoveries are ahead Reply @doctorcrumb 3 years ago How does this improve the quality of my life? Reply @newworldgrover8588 3 years ago (edited) I’m not impressed...I enjoy these videos. But I’m amazed that scientists would say,” there are things we don’t understand”. You don’t say? I believe there are quit a few things we don’t understand. Aren’t we searching the universe from a piece of sand on a beach? They’re not even sure of what they don’t know. Reply @Howie47 3 years ago Imagine the picture of half a walnut shell full of water in front of the backdrop of the Ocean. And you'll have the true humbler understanding of mankind's knowledge of the Universe. Reply 4 replies @charlesotieno2658 3 years ago 2.44 the g factor is still higher than 2. . . 1 Reply @marco.nascimento 3 years ago Woww Reply @kassimbabika 3 years ago We'll never understand and quantify everything. So, we should never get complacent and think that what we know is "all". Reply @hogansavoy6525 3 years ago We'll never figure out quantum mechanics until we have a better grasp of what exactly dark matter/energy truly is. Reply 1 reply @knightmarefuel4499 3 years ago Wait until you nerds find out how much we “know” about reality is infinitely less than you can imagine. 1 Reply @namehere4954 3 years ago We are an extremely tiny data point in a massive universe, even if we fully understood everything about our planet and could communicate with all other animals, we'd still know very little. Reply @ramade9040 3 years ago How much this answer cost american taxpayer? Reply @persiansep 3 years ago (edited) anti Graviton Reply @traealexanderosterkamp2207 3 years ago Mhmmmm love me some research Reply @rajendrakhanvilkar9362 3 years ago Great video Reply @frackjohn 3 years ago Why you try so hard to make physics hard to understand Reply @henryogie9620 3 years ago The presenter is a Cute Nerd Reply @jeepz669 3 years ago These nerds don't even know what's going on bruh 🤣 Reply @sentinela8775 3 years ago lol 😂 Reply @MichaelJONeill333 3 years ago Dark energy? Dark matter? Lol jk idfk but this is so exciting! 2 Reply @love4thetruth 3 years ago (edited) Funny how these geniuses are discovering the surface of God's design. This comment section is and will consist of most that did not know and still don't know what this is about. This includes those in the video. Reply 1 reply @ottodidakt3069 3 years ago I have a prediction : I say that the more precisely we can mesure the more small missing energy we'll have to identify for the physical model, exponentially and infinitely ! Reply @soulmedicine 3 years ago The funny thing is the fact that these people and people in general think they no things that they don't and never will but there ego won't comprehend that . People are insane. Period . There gonna do somthing stupid one day and cause serious problems in our world . There are things we will never understand so let it be. Reply @nicknorthcutt7680 3 years ago (edited) Maybe all matter is conscious to some degree? I'm no physicist but I'm always curious about what discoveries in quantum physics lie ahead. Reply @oneidea1121 3 years ago Well, this is big haha, guess we are going to change a lot of things Maybe we will finally get that ufo technology, pretty sure the US military helped in this, finally slowly revealing Reply 1 reply @phuctran4661 3 years ago Sign me up 🤚 i want to join the team Reply @samrowe2889 3 years ago Okay so you spent 20 years doing that and found the new information which is fantastic but what are you going to do with it what can you do with it are we going to make warp drive teleportation basically I understand that we don't have all the answers yet but what's the what do we hope to achieve what's the end result that you want Reply @fatehyabali 3 years ago 😲😲 Reply @wolfisraging 3 years ago Meanwhile physics students: Like we don't have enough syllabus already. Reply @johnnyllooddte3415 3 years ago sooo wrong again 1 Reply @baticadavinci3984 3 years ago I wouldn't hold my breath, it's probably nothing... Reply @aloevera8444 3 years ago change your glasses. Reply @infinity.1111 3 years ago 2:00 haha, she described science so well, obtained data that points them toward something they cannot understand. Reply @schadenfreude6274 3 years ago 5000 years later, the Muons, Quarks, Leptons and all those Scientific Thingys we know in the Standard Model might probably only be used in a Children's Toy. 1 Reply @ReviveMeAlive 3 years ago (edited) Trade offer!!! I receive a larger more powerful dectector You offer a lot of money Reply @alistairbalistair9596 3 years ago yawn... late to the table with this one Reply @charleslaine 3 years ago Creationist answer: Gawd did it! Reply @ronbosscher2857 3 years ago I hope the make not en black hole Ferry skerry the word is in danger Reply @JAAB9296 3 years ago Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty; some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain. Richard Feynman. And that is the problem with science. More often wrong than correct. Reply 1 reply @darrenjj8270 3 years ago what a load of nonsense..standard science is constantly suprised by findings....have they not broken out and realised how wrong they are yet? Reply @dingo23451 3 years ago So it was known since more than 20 years. It was simply confirmed. I downvoted this video. Reply @Mahfknamsayn 3 years ago This girl is fine af Reply @GtMcGee 3 years ago "may not know all the particles?" duh, do you think we are wetawded? Reply @akiotatsuki2621 3 years ago Google Eric Weinstein Reply @0x2a1A4 3 years ago particle physics is a flook anyways ! Reply @johnkean6852 3 years ago 'Entirely reworked' doh of course because it's all BS. Young people need to trust their own research and judgement DON'T RELY ON WHAT YOU ARE TOLD and maybe truly new discoveries and advancements may be made in science and not stoopid scientific models based more on algebra than real science that just leads to lazy philosophy When you leave University FORGET IT ALL and start afresh at the beginning DO SOME WORK and make those discoveries. Reply @SmooothOp 3 years ago great everything i learned is not enough 1 Reply @username3543 3 years ago I still didn't get to understand as to why Amanda talks in such a seductive manner 😂 1 Reply @AA99086 3 years ago This my lead to creating unlimited electricity using earth magnetic field. Just a wishful thinking Reply @MrRollingstone66 3 years ago (edited) I bet they did. Just keep that back door open for the change-up. You never know when the truth comes around and begins it’s encroachment on the BS. I’m not going to waste my time watching this theoretical nonsense. Reply @jonathonjubb6626 3 years ago This is not what other responsible channels are telling me! Unsubscribing! Reply @jonjudice1155 3 years ago Just stop with the ridiculousness of this made up science fiction posing as fact in hopes of getting more grant money Reply @Un_Pour_Tous 3 years ago The "G factor" is what my Ex Collage Girlfriend use to call hers too lol Reply @perthjysena.corpuz1920 3 years ago Im 1st literally 2 Reply 2 replies @RafaelG92 3 years ago All this is a scam Reply @goozebump 3 years ago (edited) Looks like time to build another 20 billion+ particle accelerator. How convenient. They havd to pay back their education bills and fund the latest generation of graduates lol. Reply @lilmookie6688 3 years ago You are cute. Reply @siddharthkumarsingh2462 3 years ago Bruh I'm 500th Reply @solidfuel0 3 years ago When this new force is discovered.. it will unlock levitation 🕴. Mark my words and don't copy my comment 😑 Reply @robertquick6690 3 years ago We had it all wrong !!! "Please send more money!" That's what happens when the sciences are overtaken by mathamagicians. 1 Reply @SOURAVEMEL 3 years ago Nah I’m first Reply @AifDaimon 3 years ago time to rewrite ALL Physics books??? Reply @aaabbb3738 3 years ago just theory hypothetical models ... unproven ... conjecture maskerading as science..presented as absolute facts ... etc 1 Reply @sandeeparya3378 3 years ago I just can't stand her. Please be in background. Reply @bray2083 3 years ago 3rd Reply @rudraveermandal3474 3 years ago I am first 1 Reply 2 replies @prakharchaurasia273 3 years ago First Reply @walperstyle 3 years ago Have you looked through Eric Weinstein's work yet? Reply @MrDogonjon 3 years ago Let's make a universal model where the holy trinity are the three missing bosons which are so elusive we never see them but their gravity exceeds all other matter. Using scripture we can find the science of this once we translate from ignorance the text will be clear. Reply @Yoshiikui 3 years ago first Reply 1 reply @soostdijk 3 years ago Ludicrous waste of taxpayer money. The anomaly is only that these geniuses have no idea what a photon or a photon field is. If they would study the mechanics of that all these physical mysteries would evaporate. Reply @dinorei7364 3 years ago like1 1 Reply @thomasbradley9711 3 years ago (edited) LoL proof that physics is still too male heavy and needs more females: "the search continues as they are still unable to locate the "G - factor" even with all the latest technology!" Ha ha Reply @hyronium5752 3 years ago I m Last cuz everyone is First 1 Reply @totonow6955 3 years ago Brookhaven off by even more. Zero women in the group? Should be about fifty percent. Off. Reply @SheikhN-bible-syndrome 3 years ago Of course there's 12 of them and obviously there split into 2 groups of 6 (that should be obvious) but we're forgetting something pretty important and that is ITS ALL A GUESS AND A PRODUCT OF THE IMAGINATION NO ONE HAS EVER SEEN ANY OF THESE PARTICLES AND ALL OF THE CRAP BEING SAID IS JUST HYPOTHESIS MADE WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF MATH THAT WERE ESTABLISHED BY PEOPLE THAT ALSO HAD AN IDEA ROOTED IN IMAGINATION. Reply 2 replies @JBulsa 3 years ago Waste of a ton of $ and 2 decades! should have worked off the 1st result. BNGO $ for the win! Reply @jeronimomod156 3 years ago 🙄 I'll let you know that you're putting a little bit too much liberal arts acting into your update and explanation of the findings.🤦‍♂️🤔 what next when strippers meet physics🤣 Reply