Wednesday, October 09, 2024
The Scientist Who Discovered the World's Most Beautiful Equation
The Scientist Who Discovered the World's Most Beautiful Equation
Newsthink
960K subscribers
Subscribe
17K
Share
Download
Thanks
Clip
746,912 views Mar 25, 2024
Paul Dirac's equation revealed the universe's mysterious symmetry. Try https://brilliant.org/Newsthink/
for FREE for 30 days, and get 20% off your annual premium subscription.
Highly recommend the book The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac by Graham Farmelo https://www.amazon.com/Strangest-Man-...
Follow Newsthink on X https://x.com/Newsthink
Newsthink is produced and presented by Cindy Pom
https://x.com/cindypom
Grab your Newsthink merch here: https://newsthink.creator-spring.com
Thank you to our Patrons, including:
John & Becki Johnston
Igli Laci
Support us on Patreon: / newsthink
Sources:
0:06 Frank Wilczek image: https://www.frankawilczek.com/
2:13 Virginia Knight / Cotham School, CC BY-SA 2.0 DEED
Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic, via Wikimedia Commons
10:13 Hanno Rein, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...
via Wikimedia Commons
12:10 Pierre Ramond image https://www.phys.ufl.edu/~ramond/
12:20 Stone at Westminster Abbey Stanislav Kozlovskiy, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...
via Wikimedia Commons
12:40 Nightryder84, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...
via Wikimedia Commons
Music
12:13 Music by Clovis Schneider
/ clovisschneider
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Transcript
Search in video
0:00
“Of all the equations of physics, perhaps the most magical is the Dirac equation.”
0:05
Remarked MIT physics professor Frank Wilczek.
0:08
Paul Dirac believed that the fundamental laws governing the
0:11
universe could be expressed through “pretty mathematics”
0:14
When he wrote down an equation to describe the electront, he noticed something odd.
0:19
His equation predicted the existence of antimatter - the mirror image of matter.
0:25
If matter is like the salt flats of the Salar de Uyuni in Bolivia,
0:30
antimatter emerges as its reflection, revealing the mysterious symmetry of the universe.
0:36
Dirac predicted the existence of the antimatter counterpart to the electron, the positron.
0:42
Subatomic particles with the same mass as electrons that carry a
0:46
positive electric charge in contrast to the electron’s negative charge.
0:51
If the two come into contact, they annihilate each other, converting both particles into energy.
0:57
For a man best described as an agnostic, he remarked,
1:01
“God is a mathematician of a very high order.”
1:05
Dirac was a lonely man who grew up a lonely boy and this had a profound
1:10
impact on his personality and possibly also his work as a theoretical physicist.
1:14
He told a colleague, “I never knew love or affection when I
1:18
was a child,” as described in the book “The Strangest Man” by Graham Farmelo.
1:23
Paul Dirac’s father, Charles, insisted his three children speak to him in his native French.
1:29
At dinner, Paul would sit in the living room eating with his father, while his older brother
1:34
Felix and younger sister Betty ate in the kitchen, having dinner with their British mother Florence.
1:39
When Paul mispronounced a word in French or misgendered a noun,
1:43
his father punished him by making him stay put, even if he felt like throwing up.
1:48
Paul Dirac reflected, “Since I found that I couldn’t express myself in French,
1:53
it was better for me to stay silent.”
1:56
He remained quiet into adulthood. Preferring to work alone.
2:00
He spoke so little that his colleagues jokingly defined
2:03
a unit called a "Dirac" as one word per hour.
2:08
Charles’ strict educational regime at home mirrored how he taught French at
2:12
the Merchant Venturer’s School in Bristol, where Paul was a student.
2:16
World War One indirectly benefited Paul; as the older students left for military service, it freed
2:22
up space and resources for him to advance through the upper classes, accelerating his learning.
2:27
His father insisted that he and his brother study engineering at Merchant Venturer’s College,
2:33
which was eventually absorbed by the University of Bristol.
2:36
However, Paul was not cut out for such a life; one summer spent as a
2:40
trainee engineer in a factory resulted in a report describing him as a “positive menace”
2:46
When he failed to find employme nt upon graduation owing to the serious post-war
2:50
economic depression, his father suggested he study at the University of Cambridge.
2:56
Dirac secured a spot, but couldn’t get a big enough scholarship to attend.
3:01
Instead, the head of Bristol University’s mathematics department arranged for him to
3:05
get an applied mathematics degree which he finished in two years.
3:09
When he applied to Cambridge again, he was able to secure the financial aid
3:13
that he needed, allowing him to enroll as a graduate research student in 1923.
3:19
He was lucky to study under Ralph Fowler, a distinguished physicist who introduced Dirac to
3:24
the cutting-edge field of quantum mechanics, the science of the very small, atoms and particles.
3:31
Dirac lived and breathed science, even while taking long walks by himself on Sundays.
3:37
Fowler’s lectures on Niels Bohr’s theory of the atom fascinated Dirac.
3:42
Much like planets orbiting the sun in a fixed path,
3:46
Bohr suggested that electrons orbit at certain distances from the nucleus of an atom.
3:51
However, Dirac noticed that Bohr's ideas didn't fully explain how electrons behaved
3:56
in atoms more complex than hydrogen, nor did it consider how electrons act
4:01
when moving very fast, as described by Einstein's special theory of relativity.
4:06
While Paul was developing his own theories at Cambridge,
4:09
his brother Felix was toiling away at a factory in Birmingham.
4:13
Wondering would might have been had he followed his own dream of becoming a doctor.
4:18
Instead, his father forced him into engineering.
4:21
Miserable, and making little money,
4:24
Felix’s body was found beside a bottle of poison in January 1925.
4:30
He was 24 years old.
4:33
Paul was surprised by his parents’ grief, telling a friend decades later: “I didn’t know they cared
4:38
so much…I never knew that parents ought to care for their children, but from then on I knew.”
4:45
Charles Dirac was in such deep grief that his doctor advised him to take a year off work.
4:51
Paul carried on at Cambridge.
4:54
In the summer of that year, his supervisor, Fowler, introduced him to a groundbreaking
4:59
paper by German theoretical physicist Werner Heisenberg that would change Dirac’s life.
5:05
Heisenberg proposed a new way of understanding atoms, challenging Bohr’s
5:09
model of electrons in fixed orbits. Since the exact paths of electrons
5:14
cannot be measured, he suggested focusing on what can be measured,
5:18
such as the energy levels of electrons. Heisenberg developed matrix mechanics,
5:24
a mathematical framework to describe the jumps between energy levels.
5:29
Imagine your car going from 0 to 60 miles per hour instantly without moving through
5:34
intermediate speeds, akin to an electron skipping steps as it transitions between energy states.
5:40
Shortly after, Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger presented a different view,
5:45
depicting particles as waves spread through space.
5:49
This model accounts for strange phenomena like the double-slit experiment,
5:53
where electrons act like waves rather than particles, creating interference patterns.
5:59
Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrodinger’s wave mechanics are different ways of describing
6:04
the same quantum phenomena, like reading the same book in two languages.
6:09
Author Farmelo described their impact this way: “Heisenberg and Schrödinger
6:15
had knifed a sack of gemstones, and the race was on to pick out the diamonds.”
6:20
Dirac took both their ideas and ran with them. Published in January 1928, the Dirac equation
6:27
accurately describes the behavior of electrons moving at any speed.
6:32
The equation introduced spin - a quantum property providing particles
6:37
with intrinsic angular momentum, much like the spin of a planet on its axis.
6:42
American theoretical physicist John Van Vleck likened Dirac’s explanation of spin to
6:51
Yet, within the beauty of the Dirac equation lay an anomaly.
6:55
It allowed for electrons to have negative energy.
6:59
This baffled scientists because, in classical physics,
7:03
the energy of electrons, like that of all objects, is always positive.
7:07
Dirac proposed a bold solution to this conundrum.
7:11
He suggested the existence of a “sea” of negative energy states filled with electrons.
7:17
Should an electron escape the sea by gaining sufficient energy,
7:21
it transitions to a positive energy state, leaving behind a “hole”.
7:25
The hole isn’t filled by another electron due to the Pauli exclusion principle,
7:30
which prevents two electrons from occupying the same state.
7:34
This “hole” behaves like a positively charged particle,
7:38
identical in mass but opposite in charge to the electron, acting as its antimatter counterpart.
7:44
So Dirac’s theory not only resolved the negative energy puzzle but predicted the existence of
7:50
antimatter, based purely on mathematical logic rather than empirical evidence.
7:56
His hypothesis was met with skepticism.
7:59
Farmelo, in his book, describes how: “...the critical chorus
8:03
had swelled from a whisper to a roar.” Heisenberg was concerned he might be wrong.
8:09
So was physicist Wolfgang Pauli.
8:11
Bohr was among those who were skeptical of the hole theory,
8:14
and he confronted Dirac directly, asking, “Do you believe all that stuff?”
8:20
Dirac simply responded: “‘I don't think anyone has put a conclusive argument against it.’”
8:26
He would be proved right a few years later.
8:29
In 1932, Carl Anderson at Caltech was observing the effects of
8:34
cosmic rays within his cloud chamber. He captured a photo of a charged particle,
8:39
curving in a manner that indicated a positive charge.
8:43
Anderson had stumbled upon the positron,
8:46
the antiparticle to the electron, providing the empirical evidence to support Dirac’s theory.
8:52
When asked later why he did not speak out more boldly to predict the positron,
8:57
Dirac said it was because of “pure cowardice”.
9:02
He was ecstatic about his theory but was also afraid of being proved wrong.
9:02
Anderson’s confirmation of the existence of the positron catapulted Dirac to fame.
9:08
The following year, 1933, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics
9:13
alongside Schrodinger for their contributions to atomic theory.
9:18
Dirac was initially reluctant to accept the Prize as he hated publicity,
9:22
but when others pointed out he’d receive even more publicity for turning it down, he accepted.
9:28
At 31, he stood atop the scientific world,
9:32
his contributions defying the expectations of his peers.
9:36
His personal life was also poised to defy expectations.
9:41
He was so quiet and awkward that there was never any expectation that he would find love.
9:47
Dirac once asked Heisenberg why he danced, to which Heisenberg replied it was a pleasure
9:52
to dance with nice girls. Dirac responded: 'Heisenberg,
9:56
how do you know beforehand that the girls are nice?'" as described by Farmelo in his book.
10:01
Despite his social awkwardness, he managed to find a partner who understood his unique mind.
10:07
In the 1930s, during his sabbatical at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton,
10:12
New Jersey, his colleague, physicist Eugene Wigner,
10:15
introduced him to his sister Manci who was visiting.
10:18
What began as a friendship blossomed into more,
10:22
despite Dirac’s initial hesitation, articulated in this letter to Manci:
10:27
“You should know that I am not in love with you. It would be wrong for me to
10:30
pretend that I am. As I have never been in love I cannot understand fine feelings.”
10:36
This didn’t deter Manci.
10:38
They later married, and Dirac raised Manci’s two children from
10:42
her first marriage and together, they welcomed two more children.
10:46
They settled in Cambridge, where Dirac held the Lucasian Professorship of Mathematics at
10:51
the University of Cambridge, one of the world's most prestigious
10:54
academic posts for over three decades. By the late sixties, his scientific work
11:00
began to take a backseat to his home life, where he began to focus on his gardening.
11:05
It was time for a change.
11:08
Dirac had always enjoyed his visits to America and
11:11
now sought to settle there with his wife permanently.
11:14
When he was appointed professor of physics at Florida State University, a department then ranked
11:19
83rd in the U.S., the department head likened it to the English faculty recruiting Shakespeare.
11:26
Despite such high praise, Dirac did not view himself in the same light.
11:32
In a candid conversation with physicist Pierre Ramond of the University of Florida,
11:37
Dirac confided: “My life has been a failure!”
11:41
That shocked Ramond. Author Farmelo described it this way:
11:46
“Ramond would have been less stunned if Dirac had smashed him over the head with a baseball bat.”
11:52
Dirac’s dissatisfaction stemmed from the failure of quantum mechanics to explain
11:57
something as simple as the interaction between a n electron and photon without
12:01
resorting to infinite values, making him view his work as unsatisfactory.
12:06
Ramond was shattered by Dirac’s assessment, remarking: “I could hardly believe that such
12:12
a great man could look back on his life as a failure. What did that say about the rest of us?”
12:19
Yet, in the eyes of the world, Dirac is far from a failure.
12:23
In a testament to his enduring legacy, Dirac’s equation—a cornerstone of quantum
12:28
mechanics—was immortalized on the stone floor of Westminster Abbey.
12:33
Dirac lived out the rest of his years in Tallahassee, Florida.
12:37
On October 20, 1984, he died of heart failure at home with his wife by his side.
12:44
He was 82 years old.
12:47
One of the most profound implications of Dirac’s work is the asymmetry in matter and antimatter.
12:53
According to standard physics models, the Big Bang should have produced equal
12:58
amounts of matter and antimatter, meaning they would have annihilated each other,
13:02
leaving a universe filled only with energy.
13:06
And yet, our universe is dominated by matter, which makes possible the formation of stars,
13:12
galaxies, and everything we see, including ourselves.
13:17
It remains one of the great mysteries in physics.
13:22
Paul Dirac unlocked the mysteries of the universe through his profound understanding
13:27
of the fundamental principles of science and mathematics.
13:30
If you have a quest for knowledge and would like
13:32
to brush up on your STEM skills, I can’t recommend Brilliant enough.
13:37
Brilliant is a website and app where you learn by doing,
13:40
with thousands of interactive lessons in math, science, data analysis, programming, and AI.
13:46
Each lessont lets you play with concepts - which
13:48
is WAY more effective than watching lecture videos.
13:51
Brilliant recently launched a ton of new content in data, using real-world data sets
13:56
from Starbucks, Spotify, and X to train you to see trends and make better-informed decisions.
14:03
If you’re interested in programming, you can familiarize yourself with Python and
14:07
start building programs on day one with a built-in drag-and-drop editor.
14:12
One of my favorites is the course on How LLMs work, large language models that have
14:17
the fascinating ability to generate text that’s nearly indistinguishable from human writing.
14:22
This immersive AI workshop lets you explore how LLMs build vocabulary,
14:27
select the next word, and so much more.
14:30
There’s something for everyone and the best part is:
14:31
Brilliant is FREE for you to try out for 30 days.
14:34
Just scan my custom QR code on your screen to try it out.
14:38
Or, click my custom link in the video description: brilliant.org/newsthink.
14:44
If you sign up with my custom link, you’ll get a 20% discount on Brilliant’s annual Premium
14:49
subscription, which gives you access to all of their interactive offerings.
14:54
Thanks for watching. For Newsthink, I’m Cindy Pom.
Newsthink
960K subscribers
Videos
About
TikTok
Cindy's Instagram
Support us on Patreon
Shop the Newsthink store
Born on Earth, Die on Mars (white) Classic Tee
$22.99
Spring
Born on Earth, Die on Mars (gold) Classic Tee
$22.94
Spring
Born on Earth, Die on Mars (white) Next Level 3600 | Premium Ring-Spun Cotton T-Shirt
$29.99
Spring
I Love Space (Gold SpaceX Starship) Premium Ring-Spun Cotton T-Shirt
$29.99
Spring
I Love Space (Silver SpaceX Starship) Premium Ring-Spun Cotton T-Shirt
$29.99
Spring
I Love Space (Gold SpaceX Starship) Classic Crew Neck T-Shirt
$24.99
Spring
744 Comments
rongmaw lin
Add a comment...
Pinned by Newsthink
@Newsthink
6 months ago (edited)
What other biographies would you like to see?
Try https://brilliant.org/Newsthink/ for FREE for 30 days, and get 20% off your annual premium subscription
52
Reply
20 replies
@ssake1_IAL_Research
6 months ago
I met Paul Dirac, near the end of his life, when he was professor emeritus at Florida State University. I was a typist for the Physics Dept. in 1983, and I typed what may have been his last paper (or one of his last), an overview of the field of physics. I kept a Xerox copy for many years, and finally donated it to the organization that preserves his legacy. I remember him as being very cordial to me.
1K
Reply
22 replies
@TLMuse
6 months ago
I'm an astrophysicist and long-time admirer of Dirac. This brief bio of his life was exceptionally well-produced; bravo, and thanks for giving one of my scientific heroes the attention he is due. As a personal story, I once was invited to a scientific meeting at Cambridge, and they housed us on campus, staying in what had been faculty chambers. The room I was given I was told was once Dirac's quarters. They didn't know of my long-time admiration of Dirac, so it wasn't planned; what an unexpected thrill! —Tom
141
Reply
4 replies
@louiserwin3726
6 months ago
I was a student at FSU in 1982-1984. I saw him weekly at the Love and or Physics classrooms. Unless you knew who he was, he was just another older man who was incredibly nice and polite. Always a smile.
93
Reply
5 replies
@johngrint8231
6 months ago (edited)
My favourite Dirac story comes courtesy of my old maths supervisor at Cambridge, who knew him personally. He recounted how he and his wife had entertained Dirac to dinner. As usual, Dirac said nothing the entire evening, but just sat there quietly observing the wife knitting, which he had never seen before but which clearly fascinated him. As he left at the end of the evening, he made a single remark: that there were just two distinct ways of creating a stitch. He was right, of course; but imagine having the kind of mind which could analyse knitting in the abstract and reach that conclusion!
439
Reply
14 replies
@NoName-ip4tt
5 months ago
I am an electrical engineer and I become aware of Paul Dirac during the course of harmonic analyze. Dirac Delta function is one of the crucial elements of that, and it helped me to grasp the Fourier analysis much better sense...
17
Reply
@jarnoldp
6 months ago
I actually got a chance to meet Pierre Ramond. I bought a copy of this book on field theory, I did get it signed, and he spoke with the undergraduates, and told a few stories about direct. Some of this I was already familiar with. But it was a great video. this was after a major surgery where I had to learn how to walk again. So it was nice gift. I can see why Dirac and Ramond we’re good friends. Because even after meeting him for a couple hours, he was a very humble and kind man.
27
Reply
@stevevrismo9842
6 months ago
Another perfect, yet sad example of how a wrong-headed parent screwed up their children's self-esteem. One son, dead by his own hand, the other, after decades of acclaim, only able to see his imagined failings. There's more to learn here than just the beauty and importance of Professor Dirac's equations. The science discussed in this interesting report is above my head -- not much I can do with it other than ponder its depths. The unspoken lesson here is one we can all learn from. I just hope that other viewers rethink how children are nurtured and raised.
98
Reply
10 replies
@jimdecamp7204
6 months ago
A Dirac story I heard was that when he was visiting Stony Brook University, there was a snow storm. A graduate student was "asked" to please see if he could help shovel out Professor Dirac's automobile. When he arrived, he found the tires (tyres) frozen to the driveway, and the driveway coated with treacherous ice. It seems that Professor Dirac, whose experience was with Britain and Florida's milder winters had "helpfully" poured hot water from the "kettle" (i.e., "teapot" in 'Merican) around the tires where it had frozen solid.
10
Reply
@romanieo
6 months ago
Great video! Dirac stands immortal in the minds of many leaning towards science. Seeing him as an old man and experiencing his full journey is both sobering and insightful.
65
Reply
@sdutta8
6 months ago
Given that he was apparently a bit of a recluse, it is interesting to note that he spent 6 months in Calcutta (now Kolkata) in 1928 to discuss various aspects of quantum mechanics with Satyendra Nath Bose, after whom bosons are named. The name was given by Dirac himself, who also coined the name fermion for its opposite counterpart — particles that followed Fermi-Dirac statistics. His modesty in not naming them after himself was apparent.
138
Reply
6 replies
@ArthurOgawa-q9z
6 months ago
Thank you, Cindy, for lifting up the life of Paul Dirac!
I met him quite briefly near the end of his life, and his manner was very sweet and modest. He said that he regarded his own contribution to theoretical physics to reflect his luck to live in the "golden age of quantum mechanics", where new discoveries were like "low-hanging fruit".
His theory, which was the first to synthesize quantum mechanics with special relativity, predicted the existence of an anti-particle simply as a particle propagating "backwards in time", as Richard Feynman characterized it.
However, there was the confounding presence of infinite energy or mass in the theory, which took two more decades of theoretical physics development to explain away, resulting in what we now refer to as quantum electrodynamics, considered a triumph of theoretical physics.
Dirac saw within his lifetime the maturation of his theory into the integration of the weak nuclear interaction with his own quantum electrodynamics to form a successful unified theory. He also witnessed its further development with gauge field theory, SU3, and the Standard Model. All before he passed away.
My fond notion is that he could permit himself to let go of the label of "failure" by the end of his life. He certainly impressed me as a happy person.
~~~~Arthur Ogawa
17
Reply
1 reply
@_mayankgaur_
6 months ago (edited)
Sometimes I feel so sad that the life of such important and genius scintists go unnoticed, whereas the life of celebrities are celebrated by the masses
468
Reply
31 replies
@jerzypawlowski7999
6 months ago
Dirac achieved something very rare in physics - he theoretically predicted a new phenomenon (anti-matter) through pure math.
Not only that, but much of the math of Dirac was derived earlier by the mathematicians Eli Cartan and Wilhelm Killing. They studied the symmetries of space, and found that rotations in 3d space are equivalent to rotations in a special 2d space. This allowed Dirac to take the "square root" of the Klein–Gordon equation, which produced a linear and relativistic quantum wave equation (the Dirac equation). Dirac found that his equation has two solutions, one for electrons and another for anti-electrons (positrons).
199
Reply
22 replies
@BurntOrangeHorn78
6 months ago (edited)
In my undergraduate studies of quantum electrodynamics, Dirac and Feynman seemed to me to have the most intuitive understanding of the quantum world. Their genuis astounded me.
15
Reply
1 reply
@RJPick1
5 months ago
My Grandfather taught Dirac Mathematics at school in Bristol. I only learnt this fact when my eldest son was talking to my father one day and he happened to mention it. My son now has a PhD in Physics investigating Neutrinos.
34
Reply
1 reply
@d3vilman69
6 months ago
8.06 One of the greatest photos ever taken in the history of Science. It must be very exciting to live during that era as there are legendary physicists working hard to de-mystify the inner workings of the cosmos.
15
Reply
@openroadiniran9957
4 months ago (edited)
What no one is talking about is how young Dirac was when he published his paper on Dirac's Equation. He was only 26. Interestingly, Heisenberg was only 23 years old when he came up with is Uncertainty Principle. And Einstein was 26 when he published his theory of Special Relativity.
45
Reply
3 replies
@lordfluxington
6 months ago
Einstein, Dirac, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Pauli, Bohr, Curie, Planc, Lorentz etc etc... it really was the golden age of Physics.
45
Reply
4 replies
@petertuohy2886
6 months ago
Bravo! I was completely engrossed in this marvelous production. Truly enjoyed this program.
5
Reply
@EndingSimple
6 months ago
I'm moved that he finally found someone who would love him.
8
Reply
@KipIngram
6 months ago
What I think about his feelings about himself was that he was a truly humble and gracious man. That kind of success? Most of us would get so full of ourselves we'd be practically unbearable.
6
Reply
@brianmreschke3441
6 months ago
Your gentleness is as Brilliant as the stars.
7
Reply
@varunnikam
6 months ago
We need more movies on life like these scientists. Just like they did it with Oppenheimer. The world needs to know these great people who ever lived on the same planet as us.
129
Reply
7 replies
@youerny
6 months ago
Beautiful video! Thanks. Few seconds more about the equation would have been even better, but I understand the need to balance elements for a better story telling to such a wide audience. I Just subscribed, looking for more ❤
19
Reply
@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke
6 months ago
Having studied Physical Chemistry in college I find these biographies of famous quantum mechanics heroes quite fascinating.
47
Reply
2 replies
@catmatism
6 months ago
I am no physicist but during the covid, I tried my best to understand how he derived his equation from the relativistic equation. Indeed a genius. Would never have thought in a million lifetime to use matrices.
21
Reply
1 reply
@R1cS0
6 months ago
Excellent video with great delivery - thank you for sharing it!
You may want to fix the typo at 6:28 where it says "elections" instead of "electrons".
14
Reply
2 replies
@wayneyadams
6 months ago
8:25 What an amazing collection of geniuses, the most influential and productive Physicists of all time. And look who is in the front row dead center anchoring the whole group.
10
Reply
1 reply
@niks660097
6 months ago (edited)
I love it when anamolies in untested mathematics results in new discoveries, let alone something as big as anti-matter.
3
Reply
@Pippins666
3 months ago
In Bristol there is a "Paul Dirac Trail", quite a lengthy walk taking you around places key to Dirac's life and future direction. Most commentators on Dirac's life put his success down to his initial engineering training ("engineer" not "technician" - there is a difference) that preceded his science degrees
2
Reply
@swiftmatic
5 months ago
Dirac's work even provided the 'maguffin ' for the "Cities in Flight" novels by James Blish.
4
Reply
@ianactually
6 months ago
Paul Dirac is one of the scientists I would most have liked to meet, now and then, over a cup of coffee and the occasional word. The epitome of the quiet genius.
4
Reply
@beluga7867
6 months ago
This is a highly awaited video for me. I would also recommend you to make a biography-style video about Max Born.
7
Reply
@otiebrown9999
5 months ago
Excellent, incisive and accurate.
Thanks!
2
Reply
@Johnboy33545
6 months ago
You did an excellent job. Thank you for your efforts, you made Dirac human.
2
Reply
@peterplotts1238
1 month ago
There is so much junk on YouTube, but every once in a while, I run across videos which are really very good. This is one of them. Thanks.
Reply
@royjcrump2329
5 months ago
When I look into the universe I see Paul's Dirac reflection back unto me, a positive reflection through space and time unto us as a reminder, he's still with us....thank you so much, precious moments in time, back to Dirac. about me, I'm not a physicist but I love physics. This touched my heart and I cried.
Reply
@ready1fire1aim1
6 months ago
1) Calculus Foundations:
Contradictory:
Newtonian Fluxional Calculus
dx/dt = lim(Δx/Δt) as Δt->0
This expresses the derivative using the limiting ratio of finite differences Δx/Δt as Δt shrinks towards 0. However, the limit concept contains logical contradictions when extended to the infinitesimal scale.
Non-Contradictory:
Leibnizian Infinitesimal Calculus
dx = ɛ, where ɛ is an infinitesimal
dx/dt = ɛ/dt
Leibniz treated the differentials dx, dt as infinite "inassignable" infinitesimal increments ɛ, rather than limits of finite ratios - thus avoiding the paradoxes of vanishing quantities.
2) Continuum Hypothesis:
Contradictory:
Classic Set Theory
Cardinality(Reals) = 2^(Cardinality(Naturals))
The continuum hypothesis assumes the uncountable continuum emerges from iterating the power set of naturals. But it is independent of ZFC axioms, and leads to paradoxes like Banach-Tarski.
Non-Contradictory:
Non-standard Analysis
Cardinality(*R) = Cardinality(R) + 1
*R contains infinitesimal and infinite elements
The hyperreal number line *R built from infinitesimals has a higher cardinality than R, resolving CH without paradoxes. The continuum derives from ordered monic ("monadic") elements.
3) Quantum Measurement:
Contradictory:
Von Neumann-Dirac collapse postulate
|Ψ>system+apparatus = Σj cj|ψj>sys|ϕj>app
-> |ψk>sys|ϕk>app
The measurement axiom updating the wavefunction via "collapse" is wholly ad-hoc and self-contradictory within the theory's unitary evolution.
Non-Contradictory:
Relational/Monadic QM
|Ψ>rel = Σj |ψj>monadic perspective
The quantum state is a monadological probability weighing over relative states from each monadic perspectival origin. No extrinsic "collapse" is required.
4) Gravitation:
Contradictory:
General Relativity
Gμν = 8πTμν
Rμν - (1/2)gμνR = 8πTμν
Einstein's field equations model gravity as curvature in a 4D pseudo-Riemannian manifold, but produce spacetime singularities where geometry breaks down.
Non-Contradictory:
Monadological Quantum Gravity
Γab = monic gravitational charge relations
ds2 = Σx,y Γab(x,y) dxdydyadx
Gravity emerges from quantized charge relations among monad perspectives x, y in a pre-geometric poly-symmetric metric Γ, sans singularities.
In each case, the non-contradictory formulation avoids paradoxes by:
1) Replacing limits with infinitesimals/monics
2) Treating the continuum as derived from discrete elements
3) Grounding physical phenomena in pluralistic relational perspectives
4) Eliminating singularities from over-idealized geometric approximations
By restructuring equations to reflect quantized, pluralistic, relational ontologies rather than unrealistic continuity idealizations, the non-contradictory frameworks transcend the self-undermining paradoxes plaguing classical theories.
At every layer, from the arithmetic of infinites to continuum modeling to quantum dynamics and gravitation, realigning descriptive mathematics with metaphysical non-contradiction principles drawn from monadic perspectivalism points a way forward towards paradox-free model-building across physics and mathematics.
The classical formulations were invaluable stepping stones. But now we can strike out along coherent new frameworks faithful to the logically-primordial mulitiplicites and relational pluralisms undergirding Reality's true trans-geometric structure and dynamics.
2
Reply
@edwardprice140
6 months ago
Thank you for the simple definition of QM, "the science of the very small", got it.
4
Reply
@vylon1075
6 months ago
For someone as awkward as Paul Dirac, it is ironic that he predicted that every particle has a pair.
8
Reply
1 reply
@MrBlaDiBla68
5 months ago (edited)
I have a "good" scientific interest, but did not know about Dirac yet.
Thank you very much for making this video !
2
Reply
@revenant2979
3 months ago
In the previous video(John von Neumann) I wanted to ask for a video on Paul Dirac, strangely it was. One can only wonder at such brilliance.
1
Reply
@howardalward839
5 months ago
I was lucky and got to meet Paul at FSU in 1975. His office was across-the-hall from my faculty advisor's and we became 'elevator friends'.
2
Reply
@tanguaypaulley5200
6 months ago
this was interesting, i hadnt heard much about Dirac's life. also, I'd like to see a video about Ettore Majorana lol
11
Reply
@trevorjones104
6 months ago
I would just like to say "Thank You!" for the very interesting presentation!
Such a wonderful change from the all too prevalent, machine (mis-)read, machine translated, narrations attached to otherwise interesting subjects, that essentially make them intolerable to sit through!
I found your speaking style to be both very clear, and accurate, and it was a pleasure to listen to!
FWIW, somehow, despite YouTube's best efforts to do me over for using an ad blocker, your video appeared in my feed and it was intriguing enough to click upon, and I am glad that I did! I will look for more from you in future!
Cheers!
3
Reply
1 reply
@piupiu-ti4dd
3 months ago
Isn't it amazing that the world is driven by pure mathematics?! Dirac proved this perfectly! Even such giants of physics as Pauli and Heisenberg were not confident in Dirac's discovery. Thanks for the great video.
Reply
@brunorhagalcus6132
1 month ago
Never thought a physics video could instill knowledge and evoke emotion like this. Well done!
Reply
@nathanaultman7465
2 weeks ago
Thank you! This was a wonderful short biography of a legendary man in Physics!
Reply
@maximilliancunningham6091
6 months ago
Superb dissertation ! Thank you. 😀
1
Reply
@RobertFarley532
6 months ago
I had initially planned to retire at 62, work part-time, and save money, but the impact of high prices on various goods and services has significantly disrupted my retirement plan. I'm worried about whether those who experienced the 2008 financial crisis had it easier than I currently am. The volatility of the stock market is a concern as my income has decreased, and I fear that I won't be able to contribute as much as before, potentially jeopardizing my retirement savings.
162
Reply
10 replies
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270
6 months ago
Paul Dirac was a GENIUS and one of the 5 greatest physicists ever. They claimed he was autistic, but that's idle speculation, never confirmed. The man essentially created quantum field theory without even being aware he was doing it (as Feynman later said). He was INCREDIBLE. Dirac Metals are really interesting too; I'm hoping you guys will cover that in a later video.
However, this video is really bad click bait and I didn't really learn what makes an equation "beautiful." Calling ANY equation "the world's most beautiful equation" without first establishing the criteria of what makes ANY equation "beautiful" to begin with, is intellectually dishonest and insults the intelligence of your audience.
This is a click-bait title, but I get it, you need the clicks and eyeballs. Euler's identity is traditionally considered the most "beautiful equation in the world" because it's ostensibly simple but encodes a lot of complexity within it (and it has wide applications).
You made a whole video and I STILL don't know why it's more "beautiful" than Newton's law of gravitation or the Einstein Field Equations or Maxwell's EM equations.
CLICK BAIT. Love your channel, but this video is silly. I still don't know what makes the Dirac equation "the most beautiful" lol.
Why not do a wide historical sampling of ALL the equations in the history of mathematics that are considered by ACTUAL mathematicians to be the "the most beautiful equations," and then showing how Dirac's equation is in accord with the intellectual spirit of those other "beautiful equations."
CLICK BAIT.
1
Reply
Newsthink
·
1 reply
@RichardCorongiu
5 months ago
Strangely I "met" PAM Dirac in Chemistry...I was impressed....so should we all... thank you for this great inspirational presentation of the most underrated genius
Reply
@arctic_haze
6 months ago
Most beautiful? This is a question of opinion. My favorite is Maxwell's equations. They made discovering relativity inevitable.
7
Reply
5 replies
@fungussa
5 months ago
The video clearly didn't explain why it was the most beautiful equation.
2
Reply
@vigilante8374
6 months ago
I mean, Dirac is crazy underrated don't get me wrong but no equation could ever top Euler's identity.
3
Reply
1 reply
@jagrutbhatt3301
2 months ago
Very good, heartening info.Thanks.
1
Reply
@braveecologic2030
1 month ago
That was comforting. And really good.
Reply
@Taomantom
6 months ago
Thank you for sharing this story.
2
Reply
@tgx6288
6 months ago
the way you narrate is very peaceful 🙏🙏😍😍
13
Reply
1 reply
@awakegnome
6 months ago
Immortality is something trully beautiful. I came here to watch a video of about physics and math, but instead, I've watched a love story about a boy who believed that he was incapable of love and changed the world... amazing.
1
Reply
1 reply
@billrodgers5532
6 months ago
Excellent Video and narration.
3
Reply
@wayneyadams
6 months ago
12:48 That looks like one of the lecture halls in the science building at the University of Miami. In fact, on closer inspection, it is definitely so.
1
Reply
@squiddy2688
2 weeks ago
Great piece, loved the calm and soothing narration.
Reply
@Shreysoldier
6 months ago
Dirac's view of religion is just like mine, i couldn't believe someone would have my exact view on religion . He was also a good human being, unlike some of the famous theoretical physicists at that time. I also love seeing the Dirac equation, as an aspiring theoretical physicist.
7
Reply
3 replies
@professional640
6 months ago
The beauty of science can only be interpreted by us folks through the ingenuity of such scientists. The ways they think of everyday things is what we may consider poetry.
2
Reply
@bryanfuentes1452
6 months ago (edited)
he is a very humble man. High respect for him..as far as I know, his equation is like an upgraded version of Schrodinger equation by combining it with SR.
1
Reply
2 replies
@KipIngram
6 months ago (edited)
What a terrible way to raise your child. The most important thing in child-raising is for your children to know that you love them, unconditionally and without exception. That doesn't mean you don't discipline them - the two things aren't mutually exclusive. I loved Duke Leto Atreides's line in the 2021 version of Dune - Paul asked him "What if I don't want to be Duke?" Leto answered him, but finished with "And even if your answer is no, you're already the only thing I've ever needed you to be. My son." Yeah - that's how it should be, right there.
1
Reply
@ThomasJr
4 months ago
It's heart breaking to watch this video. I had no idea it would present other things about him aside from
his genius. The punishments from his father, the loss of his brother to suicide, and his
apparent low self esteem.
Reply
@tomp538
6 months ago
I don't understand such things as this; but I look forward to the day that I will...
2
Reply
@asterialumin_2030
5 months ago
Absolutely one of the BEST videos I've see on YouTube! Thank you for making this video and giving such a detailed explanation! This really is a beautiful equation and Dirac is, far from being a failure. I hope most people, nowadays, recognize his work as well!
Reply
@syzygy808
6 months ago
$9.99
Thank you! Best Dirac presentation I’ve seen yet. ❤👍🏽💯
10
Reply
Newsthink
·
2 replies
@agytjax
1 month ago
At 6:32, it says "elections moving at any speed"🤣🤣🤣
1
Reply
@rickintexas1584
1 month ago
I had no idea Dirac was a professor at Tallahassee, and that he died there in 1984. I was studying aeronautical engineering in Daytona at that time. It would have been cool knowing such a brilliant and influential man was so close to us.
Reply
@weylguy
6 months ago
Great video. Dirac's relativistic electron equation is truly beautiful. I wish more people could appreciate its beauty and significance.
1
Reply
1 reply
@wakomatic5402
1 month ago
Hi Cindy! Great narration on one of my favourite subjects and physicists.
Reply
@stevercarter5317
1 month ago
PhD Paul Dirac has been one of my favorite people, I don’t know why.
Reply
@vermilionvoyager2470
6 months ago
Truly brings a human touch. We see the work but never the person. Thank u
1
Reply
@gusv6137
6 months ago
What Dirac did was an act of ingenuity. Today, admittedly, one would simply have to open a textbook on the representations of the rotation group, and copy and paste - if one is able to conceive the jargon of the mathematicians.
1
Reply
@johnhoey1615
1 month ago
Thank you for presenting such an excellent biography full of insight into the life that shaped the mind of such a towering figure in physics. It's easy to forget that they are people too
Reply
@simonhanson5990
2 months ago
A beautiful story. I see that many great minds battled with profound hardships and sufferings in life, undeterred and perhaps even because of these hardships, they shine anyway...
Reply
@deantsar6246
6 months ago
Most Physicists, Cosmologists, Scientists, Mathematicians and Astrophysicists are all starting to believe in a Creator.
Everything in life, is so finely tuned and precise, that can only be fully explained by our belief in our Creator.
Man, for all his questions and endeavours, throughout history, is finally going back to basics.
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
️
1
Reply
@paulpease8254
6 months ago
Thanks for the video, brings me back to my younger years when I loved studying the history of science and learning how humanity has steadily uncovered the mysteries of the universe.
Reply
@TheDarkElder
7 days ago
One of my all-time favourite guys from Physics.
Reply
@wayneyadams
6 months ago
I heard a funny story about Dirac when he was here at the University of Miami, in Coral Gables. I do not know if it is true, but if it is, it is very funny. The story says he had a penchant for taking coconuts from people's yards along his four-mile walk from his home in Coconut Grove to the university for which he finally got into trouble and was told to stop stealing coconuts. LOL
1
Reply
@shiyo2067
5 months ago
7:48 Fascinating! Thanks for the high quality explanation. I am yet to learn quantum mechanics and advanced physics! It's amazing that how Dirac was able to explain his discoveries in layman's language.
Reply
@_harrysingh
6 months ago
What an absolutely great man! Thanks for the amazing video :)
2
Reply
@Robert-i2d4u
6 months ago
Negative energy does not mean antimatter.
2
Reply
@1arritechno
4 months ago
For most of those with high intelligence, like Dirac, 'are also Introverts'. Most Introverts are analytical ; they are problem solvers , trouble shooters, but also,,, experts at finding faults within themselves..! High intelligence is often accompanied by depression or at least anxiety , unlike most in society ; they cannot retreat into blissful ignorance......
1
Reply
@avi2125
5 months ago
Great narration.
I stayed in Tallahassee for several months where my girlfriend was pursuing a phd in English at FSU. Compared to schools back northeast, i found FSU (and Tallahassee) so sterile...now i know better...
I like the "A Beautiful Mind" parallels ..
Reply
@acchatt
6 months ago
At 6:30 the script reads Elections instead of Electrons 😊
2
Reply
@krisdapiampongsant2169
6 months ago
Best explanation of Dirac’s equation ever.
Reply
@BenRasmussen-c3u
6 months ago
Great story, thanks
2
Reply
@eytansuchard8640
6 months ago
There is no doubt about the great achievement of Dirac's spinor equation. On the other hand we should not forget that it is a differentiation of rotation more than a root of the D'Alembert operator. A rotation in 4D is an acceleration of a 4-vector. There are boost accelerations and rotational accelerations and both are rotations in Minkowsky spacetime of a unit vector. Dirac's idea can be also formalized as a geometrical equation without using spinors, as a deviation from geodesic motion. Such models must be based on events and not on particles, where "energy" appears where these events are accelerated. The Geometric Chronon Field Theory is one such example although it suffers from the prediction that not only the energy of the electric field generates gravity but also the charge itself does and with negative charge generating weak anti-gravity. Such a property is very difficult to measure because in high voltage capacitors, the dipoles in the dielectric layer are oppositely aligned with the external field and ruin any Hermann Bondi inertial/gravitational dipole. There should be a dynamic solution that involves both DC and AC so the theory can still be shown to correctly describe Nature or be refuted.
Reply
@qet-lab
6 months ago
We need a movie - A beautiful Mind
2
Reply
@tonydeltablues
6 months ago
I walk pass Dirac's house in Monk Road, Bristol regularly....Interesting video.
1
Reply
@kulturfreund6631
1 month ago
Thanks for the very well made, beautiful video.
Reply
@abooaw4588
5 months ago
As french we thrive abroad not at home 🇨🇵.Dirac's father is the real example of how as french living abroad we love our language.But here in Paris my hometown people don't care much about the level of french you speak but some fancy words in english you utter. Voilà 🗼🇨🇵
Reply
@gerardopaezjimenez512
2 months ago
Amazing!!! thanks a LOT!!!! Dirac has been my hero all my life!!!!
Reply
@mr.x2870
6 months ago
Dirac equations represent an universe of it's own.
1
Reply
@ivan.jRoijals
3 months ago
Oh boy... Kolmogorov, Poincaré, Maxwell... to start with some amazing ones, still quite invisible. But the list is huge!
Reply
@dr.satishsharma1362
6 months ago
Excellent... thanks 🙏.
2
Reply
@alanmott-smith9358
6 months ago
"All things being equal..." Nothing is equal.
Reply
@gertjanfass3845
5 months ago
Thanks for this very good video about Paul Dirac's life and works.
Reply
@georgekaye6569
2 months ago
There is a story, from my own college where Dirac was once a fellow, that a drunk undergraduate had a bet with another that he could get Dirac to say more than two words. He staggered up to high table and said straight to Dirac, 'Professor, I bet my friend I could get you to say more than two words. Would you oblige?' Dirac responded, 'you lose'.
Reply
@jamesb2059
6 months ago
The cynicism of Trump is breathtaking. Actions based on careful thought have led to human progress, while arrogant certainty is inherently dangerous and has led to countless wars and persecution.
2
Reply
@BC-lf4om
1 month ago
Great Photo of All the Great Scientists @ 8.12 approx.
Reply
@Boris29311
2 months ago
About his childhood,great way to restrain the development of his emotional side.
Reply
@brianandrew27
6 months ago
Thank you Cindy!
Love these.
Do some biologists in the future!
2
Reply
@SalehElm
6 months ago
Very nice video. Thank you.
1
Reply
@petergibson2318
3 months ago
Not every child has loving parents. Dirac's personality was shaped by his childhood.
He was a lonely genius completely devoid of "social skills".
He was scared of his parents and later he was wary of everybody....this came from his childhood.
Reply
@vickyb3445
1 month ago
I could get lost in Dirac's fathomless eyes.
That said, what were we talking about??
Oh yeah. The equation.
Reply
@massmanute
6 months ago
What an interesting video! How about a biography of J. Willard Gibbs? I regard Gibbs as America's greatest scientist, with the possible exception of Murray Gell-Mann
1
Reply
@thecatchannel852
5 months ago
made me cry...awww...nice story
Reply
@woodtv4481
6 months ago
My greatest dream is to meet these kind of people in my life, even at least once. I manage to educate myself to a point that i truly fell in love with physics, but my financial circumstances dictates that i should work to earn money. That killed all the hopes in me pursuing my dream of becoming a physicist. Now, i just work 8 to 5 just to live day by day. Without even knowing if i could be of service to mankind if only i pursued my dream Of becoming a physicist.
Reply
@JakeSeeber
6 months ago
Really great video, thank you.
1
Reply
@drpainjourney
6 months ago
There is no doubt in my mind, that Sir Dirac was on the Autism Spectrum.
Never really understood the relationship between other human being.
Many thank you for this nice video!
1
Reply
@s.4155
6 months ago
Beautiful video. The book on P.A.M. Dirac by G. Farmello is a great book.
Reply
@2Oldcoots
6 months ago
Incredible!
1
Reply
@manfredgeilhaupt5070
3 months ago
Dirac only left an answer on the question: "What is mass and charge from Theory?" GR+TD possibly does
Reply
@marksakowski9272
1 month ago
He hasn't discovered it !!!!!!!!!!He worked it out!!!!!!!!
1
Reply
@acyned8079
6 months ago
Thank you for the biography and history lesson!
Reply
@Nikos10
6 months ago
Your voice is amazing. You should rent it to big media companies❤
1
Reply
1 reply
@gelamegeneishvili7240
6 months ago
Bros first love letter really was "I don't really love you".
1
Reply
@ytrrs
6 months ago
6:27 - 6:31 The text in the slide reads: "The Dirac equation... of elections moving..." - Yes, ELECTIONS! 🤣
1
Reply
@sntk1
6 months ago
I highly recommend Farmelo's biography, 'The Strangest Man.'
Reply
@chrismathis4162
2 months ago
It’s shocking that a genius like Dirac ended up at Free Shoes University!
Reply
@TM-yn4iu
6 months ago
Which is, to me, the greater - the narrative or the factual content...another more importantly to me which blends both to create a wonderful video....entertaining. thanks
Reply
@alggazteca
3 months ago
What a great video on the life of one of my favorite physicists, as I share the same name with him: Adrien. You should try correcting the text that appears at 14:57. It reads: elections instead of electrons. Nice piece of work!
Reply
@thejils1669
5 months ago
The more I read about science discovering the further complexities of nature, the more I realize how simple nature must ultimately be.
Reply
@actua7
8 days ago
Imagine how much further he could've gone without the abusive father figure
Reply
5 months ago
Thank you NewsThink
Reply
@gibson2623
3 months ago
Most beautiful equation is Euler's identity
1
Reply
@99bits46
5 months ago
So glad to hear that Schrodinger won the award with Dirac. Unlike, Roger Penrose whose model of universe was used by Stephen Hawking and Hawking won the Nobel prize for it. While, Roger Penrose was awarded Nobel Prize in 2020 some 45 years later after he made contributions to Physics. Dirac stands on the should of Erwin Schrodinger just like Hawking stood on the shoulders of Penrose.
Reply
@exdejesus
5 months ago
Excellent biography! It's sad that his life was so isolated.
Reply
@TheEducat0r
6 months ago
Brace yourselves for a journey into the realm where art and science converge! This equation isn't just beautiful—it's a masterpiece that unlocks the mysteries of the universe!
Reply
@Alan-zf2tt
1 month ago
Excellent video and thank goodness for YouTube and videos such as these.
A couple of observations and an approximate timestamp:
6:30 may I suggest changing 'elections;' to 'electrons'?
7:40 I do ponder and wonder if our human bipedal nature introduces a subtle bias? Why electron and proton? If these things have a range of possibilities can we establish a range of probabilities of those occurring? The "matter" and/or "anti-matter" views are almost a good example of what I mean.
Why not range of all possible states, probability of each of those states and likelihood of encountering those states?
Reply
@djayjp
6 months ago
The allegedly instantaneous jumps between electron valences was recently found to not be instantaneous.
1
Reply
@sury39
5 months ago
when i was 20y old i wastaught Diracequation ( madras m cphys) i was enamoured by the elegance of equation and the great outcome!!!
Reply
@SonnyBubba
3 months ago
I can’t believe that I got as far as earning a masters degree in physics in the late 90’s, yet the only mention of Dirac in my education was his delta function, which is a handwaving mathematical trick to get around the infinities created when trying to determine a density function for a point mass.
Two semesters of graduate level quantum mechanics, and the class was so bogged down just trying to figure out Schrödinger’s and Heisenberg’s work that we never got to Dirac’s contribution.
Looking back, I feel cheated.
Reply
@prabakaranr3001
3 months ago
Great . I was a fan of Dirac. I was a mechanical engg student then at IIT Madras
Reply
@tetrabot7713
6 months ago (edited)
Him finding out Anti - Matter because of the equations he derrived is just like Einstein getting the result of an expanding universe from his equation . We live in a world of amazing individuals, thanks for letting me know more about them.
2
Reply
1 reply
@felicytatomaszewska
6 months ago
God created the mathematics and physics...
2
Reply
@clovissimard3099
1 month ago
STRUCTURES FINES DE L'UNIVERS:
Nous connaissons relativement peu de choses sur notre Univers, les progrès fulgurants de la science et les nouvelles technologies amènent autant de questions que de réponses. Le Cosmos est infiniment vaste et tout aussi complexe. Qu’est-ce qui le compose? L’Univers est-il vraiment infini? Voici quelques mystères qui fascinent les scientifiques!
Reply
@abhijeetverma3290
6 months ago
We need more people like Cindy also she deserves a noble prize for contributing on helping people discover beautiful minds describing them in the most beautiful way, just like matter mirrors antimatter,I love you Cindy!
1
Reply
@justanotherguy469
3 months ago
Thank you, for this video.
Reply
@Auguur
6 months ago
As a species, we collectively take credit for the exceptional few of us who rise to such great heights. Celebrities, elitists, and scammers alike all worship imaginary wealth. And while some definitely benefit society, the truly exceptional scientists who make it possible for the rest of us to persist are on another level.
Reply
@rumsbymusic
6 months ago
Another great video about another great mind. Dirac really should be more famous/recognised/known in the world.
Reply
@oksanaorehova3257
4 months ago
People forget the magical Dirac delta or unit impulse function, infinite at the impulse point, 0 elsewhere, yet it has a unit area inside that arrow! Genius!
Reply
@sntk1
6 months ago
This uncertainty relation cannot play a fundamental role in a
theory in which h itself is not a fundamental quantity. I think one
can make a safe guess that uncertainty relations in their present
form will not survive in the physics of the future.
~Dirac
1
Reply
@johnward5102
6 months ago
Great post about a very great man. How weird (or perhaps it isn't) that he had such a hard start in life, that would have crippled many.
Reply
@vibehighest
6 months ago
wow this man was faculty at FSU at one point?? wowowowow
Reply
@FrankCobb.
6 months ago
5:29
My car going from 0 to 60 instantly as if it were an electron jumping between different energy levels.
Me inside the car: I am become DEATH
Reply
@kathrynlittle2523
3 months ago
I just “discovered” your channel. In your biographies I love 🥰 your attention to the subject’s early life. How about a biography of Daniel Dennett? I feel confident that whomever you choose, it will be great❣️
Reply
@LawrenceLee-x1j
1 month ago
excellent documentary
Reply
@yogeshmore3517
6 months ago
Brilliant content...kudos for makers
Reply
@AutomationDnD
4 months ago
she never blinks, .... never
but it's a pritty good AI voice
1
Reply
@jeremiahhankins3372
1 month ago
This is a quite nice video. Please invest in a better microphone! So happy to hear an actual person speaking here. Thank you!🎉
Reply
@feynmanschwingere_mc2270
6 months ago
The greatest physicists of the 20th Century are:
1. Einstein (easy, by far)
2. Dirac
________
Everybody else. (#3 probably Feynman)
1
Reply
@stephenbesley3177
4 months ago (edited)
From my city not far from me. The same school as Carey Grant in fact. I thought a "Dirac" expressing a point with he least amount of words. Anyway, a quiet but brilliant mind.
Reply
@WolfiePeters
4 months ago
For me, he is the top not only as a scientist and applied mathematician, but also as a human being.
Reply
@Desertphile
6 months ago
Professor Dirac is my favorite particle physicists--- I idolized him since I was a wee lad. It was much later that I learned Dirac was autistic like I am. THE STRANGEST MAN is an awesome read. I feel sorry for him, though.
Reply
@nomarcarter3645
3 months ago
The description of Diracs anti matter, and reaction between the Electron and Positron is Dark Matter.
Reply
@uddiptalukdar
4 months ago
This video is so profound and beautiful.
Reply
@jaypandya9661
6 months ago
So well articulated that a layman like me cud at least understand intuitively, if at all I understood. Thank u
Reply
@sambrandon7653
2 months ago (edited)
“The most beautiful …”, “The most … MAGICAL (?!?!)”
Pure mathematical … mysticism.
The future generations will be ashamed, very ashamed of all "physicists", starting with Einstein, and up to these days. That is your future. That is your legacy. Eternal shame.
“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
In Dirac's original paper, he predicts "antimatter", which is: a "particle" which has NEGATIVE mass.
Something like that, mathematically, IS possible, but physically ... well, if a child would come up with such idea, that would be because a child does not know the world yet. But when ... a physicist (?) comes up with such "idea", then ... he is quite insane. He is not ignorant, he knows things, but despite that ... he proposes ... utter nonsense. And that is very, very bad, but things can be much, much worse: that nonsense is accepted as "a bold, brilliant idea" by all .... "physicists".
"But that was based on evidence!".
What "evidence"? Positron has POSITIVE mass. That is ABSOLUTELY opposite to the very core of Dirac's ... bold (sick, ill, mad) idea. His "prediction" (prophecy) was that matter and antimatter ANNIHILATE. Completely. When “particle” (electron) encounters its "antiparticle" (positron), the result is NOTHING. Zero. 0. That was his prophecy.
And, in reality, when positron (a perfectly material "particle", factually material, evidently material) encounters electron, the result is: two gamma photons. Whose total energy (sum of their energies) is equal to 2mc^2, where 2m is the sum of electron's mass m and positron's mass m (plus kinetic energy of positron and electron at the moment of their collision).
Does the Dirac’s equation predicts that? ABSOLUTELY NOT.
But then comes ... Feynman, and says "Dirac's equation is perfectly good, if one realizes(??!!) that positron is a particle which ... moves backwards in time(!?!?)".
The madness ... develops. Like a rapid cancer. And the "physicists" are ... in ecstasy!
Please, explain how the PET scanner works, if positrons "move backwards in time".
I remember the time when ALL top-"physicists" started to look for a way to ... "send particles to the past and then back to present". And "to catch particles which come back from the future, and to try to extract information about future events". Total madness. Among ... the "top elites" in "physics" community.
And the maddest is ... the basic motive for accepting and developing this madness:
Heisenberg's (mad) "uncertainty principle" "allows" small deviations, small, tiny discrepancies in the amounts of "created" ("spontaneously", and "out of nothing") energies -- on "a broader time-scales", energy and mass conservation "principle" (which is not a principle, but the fact, and to any sane mind very clear fact) "works" (is fulfilled, is "satisfied"), but, on "the smaller time-scales" "there exists the possibility to ... create things out of nothing". And ... if that is possible, then ... it must be - somehow - possible to achieve the total annihilation, too".
"We are on the way to become ... GODS!!!".
And ... the mad elites (financial and "scientific" (the majority of them is Jewish. Fact.)) pursue that "ultimate goal". "The holy grail" of ... ultimate power!
That is the ... true motive for research in CERN.
Those who, actually, are the most mad people in the history, are regarded as ... the "greatest minds who walked the Earth". We live in times of ultimate madness. Our future is "shaped" by ... the maddest people in the history of mankind. Intelligent and ... mad. The worst possible combination: intelligence and madness.
In psychiatry, such combination is classified as: the worst kind (the most dangerous kind) of psychopaths and sociopaths.
Even to mad and intelligent people it is perfectly clear that, e.g. Aztec-elites would had never accepted the fact (TRUTH) that Sunrise has nothing to do with killing people.
Also, ... we all know how did elites behave in the times when Galileo lived... . The truths discovered by Galileo were suppressed in the most gruesome ways.
So, the true TRUTH about how universe fundamentally works has no chance to be accepted.
The true fundamentals of universe are very simple and comprehensible. Even to the kids in primary schools. The true fundamental physics is not just simple and comprehensible, but it is also inherently unified.
1
Reply
@TheBluePhoenix008
2 days ago
8:14 this right here is the smartest photo in all of human time.
Reply
@panagiotisk.koumoundouros8681
1 month ago
More science like this please
Reply
@quogir1
2 months ago
Fine, tank you. "It takes Love over gold and mind over Matter" mark Knopfler
Reply
@Jack_Dikian
6 months ago
The Dirac equation can only be applied to a single particle - not as you say "moving electrons at any speed."
Reply
@sunmoonlites
6 months ago (edited)
“Even though Antimatters are not equal to matters in numbers . The power of antimatter’s and matters”
Reply
@peterdowney1492
5 months ago
I read or heard somewhere from someone who knew him that the social awkwardness was overplayed. And I wonder if when Dirak answers Heisenberg's point about dancing with 'nice girls' by asking 'Heisenberg, how do you know beforehand that the girls are nice?' he is actually showing a laconic humour.
Reply
@rayrocher6887
5 months ago
thanks Dirac - i appreciate your Equation. i am sorry if life was harsh on you. quantum mechanics is awesome. love Dirac style.
Reply
@Vengemann
6 months ago
i want to see Boltzmanns biography
11
Reply
4 replies
@eswaravardhan4146
6 months ago
from 1:06 to 3:26 it took 2 minutes 20 seconds to explain more than 20 years of a man's hardships after which found his own path which led this to success. everyday of those 20 years would have been so miserable for that guy, always thinking about his life choices
Reply
@sntk1
6 months ago
When a state is formed by the superposition of two other states, it will have properties that are in some vague way intermediate between those of the original states and that approach more or less closely to those of either of them according to the greater or less 'weight' attached to this state in the superposition process. The new state is completely defined by the two original states when their relative weights in the superposition process are known, together with a certain phase difference, the exact meaning of weights and phases being provided in the general case by the mathematical theory.
~Dirac
To monochromatic light corresponds in the acoustic domain the simple tone. Out of different kinds of monochromatic light composite light may be mixed, just as tones combine to a composite sound. This takes place by superposing simple oscillations of different frequency with definite intensities.
~Weyl
Reply
@randomrandomizer
6 months ago
Very nicely done. Great video. I thought it was a robotic voice at first and wanted to stop watching but realised it wasn’t so watched till the end. What a great piece of history.
Reply
@AhsanTritya
6 months ago
make more physics video, i love this series 😁
2
Reply
@Chemicator
6 months ago
Good explanation👍
1
Reply
@misterflamingo
6 months ago
This moved me
Reply
@corners1733
6 months ago
I was looking forward to a video about this
Reply
@smartdoctorphysicist3095
1 month ago
Hi I do thank you for this great program, I don't have the money for Brilliant but it look very good.
Reply
@freds4703
6 months ago
I have had positrons generated in my body during a PET scan. Amazing technology.
Reply
@morenofranco9235
6 months ago
Excellent documentary of a brilliant mind.
Reply
@dariushmilani6760
6 months ago
I stumbled upon your channel and very much enjoyed it. Liked and Subscribed 👍❤
Reply
@NaaneVinu
6 months ago
Chinnaswamy Stadium should be demilished and rebuilt with bigger ground with 70mtrs to boundaries and increasing seating capacity from 32K to 100K. this would give tremendous revenue to KSCA and RCB Franchise as well as we can create a fortress out for RCB.
Reply
@dads4514
4 months ago
But the big bang theory may be a dynamical system with chaotic solutions, resulting in at least one universe with a preponderance of matter over anti-matter in which we (mostly made of matter, obviously) find ourselves.
Reply
@qafmbr
6 months ago
amazing how badly parents can damage a child and how the effects can last a lifetime.
Reply
@thenumbernine
5 months ago
Quaternions > Dirac Matrices
1
Reply
@kerrykikker
6 months ago
At 7:03: I thought I recognised the then President of Ireland sitting on the right of Paul Dirac... the 1942 photo is of Paul Dirac, Erwin Schrödinger and Irish mathematical physicists at the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS). First row from left: Sheila Power, Padraig de Brún, Paul Dirac, Éamon de Valera, Arthur Conway, Arthur Eddington, Erwin Schrödinger, and Albert Joseph McConnell. Interesting to see the clerics engaged in matters of the elements of matter. They must have been as anxious to collar the collisions as early as anyone else...!
Reply
1 reply
@Hyperion1722
3 months ago
e=mc squared anytime. So elegant and simple.
Reply
@binbots
6 months ago
We observe the universe in the present moment (wave function collapse) surrounded by the observable therefore, predictable past (general relativity) moving towards the unobserved therefore, probabilistic future (quantum mechanics).
1
Reply
@jackthetford7558
5 months ago
Excellent!
Reply
@AjaySahai-y7o
6 months ago
Why would you limit God to ever use a poor mans method like Math
1
Reply
@mohammadinamullah9380
4 months ago
Dirac was a mathematical genius.
Reply
@69erthx1138
6 months ago
Never knew that Dirac had such an extreme level of self criticism. Almost like the Nietzsche of physics world
Reply
@edwinov
5 months ago
VERY nice narration. I could listen to her voice for hours.
Reply
@MatheusBatistaBonfa-fo2hh
6 months ago
Euler laughs in total despise to that video... e^pi.i = 1 (GOATED)
2
Reply
@mafizulislam4674
6 months ago
I think @Newsthink delivery
Improve my insight
Thanks
Reply
@professional640
6 months ago
It is amazing to think that scientists like Dirac uphold the ingenuity of humanity even after being challenged by it in the harshest of ways!🥲
1
Reply
@DaveMellor1
3 weeks ago
Fascinating ❤
Reply
@markosskace514
6 months ago
Since the times of Dirac, theoretical physicists have invented tons of "beautiful" mathematics, but none of them was confirmed by observations.
2
Reply
@nickbrutanna9973
6 months ago
What did that say about the rest of us? It says that some of us have a grounding in reality. Others have a grounding in their brilliance. Brilliance is never satisfied. Reality often is.
Reply
@PSShaw-w9m
2 months ago
One correction needed in the video at time 6.31 -- The statement on the screen says -- The Dirac equation describes the behavior of elections moving at any speed. "Elections needs to be replaced by Electrons" -- Small correction. Wont matter if you dont do it -- but giving it since you accept feedback.
Reply
@WhirledPublishing
6 months ago
@4 minutes: Since the planets don't orbit the sun, there is no basis for imagining electrons orbit the nucleus - since the motions of the sun, moon, mercury, venus, etc., are determined by the EM forces of the toroidal spheroid, the motion of microscopic elements might also be controlled by the EM forces of microscopic toroidal spheroids.
Reply
@mihaleben6051
4 months ago
"Dirac, my favorite schizo" -a youtube comment
1
Reply
@aniketbose4360
6 months ago
No generation understood the brilliant minds. It's only after they achieve something great until then world is cruel to them.
1
Reply
@maryvasilakakos7387
6 months ago
Why is the equation beautiful?
1
Reply
@TheGmr140
6 months ago
Very nice 😊😊😊
1
Reply
@GoldenFlowerAbbey
5 months ago
The problem with quantum mechanics is quantum mechanics.. Heisenberg's ideas weren't' all that great and at least Paul knew why. Math is not physics.
2
Reply
@markszlazak
3 weeks ago
They should have listened more seriously to Dirac and his failure because it left the infection of infinite values throughout physics. So it was telling physicists their models are incomplete or nonsense.
Reply
@maxime9636
6 months ago
Thank U so much 👍❤🌹
Reply
@silverspear-nq7vm
4 months ago
The only difference between Bohr model and Rutherford model is of confidence
Reply
@BohdanTrotsenko
6 months ago
3:47 Our Galaxy pictured with incorrect proportions
Reply
@peterlandbo2726
4 months ago
Beautiful. Equation. Now, that's what I call an oxymoron😆
1
Reply
@glenmartin2437
5 months ago
Thank you.
Reply
@premprakashjauhari2751
6 months ago (edited)
A great scientist. Anti- matter is a reality. Nature loves symmetry. Duality in nature is very important phenomenon.
Reply
@DJCray8472
6 months ago
6:30 "The Dirac equation describes the behaviour of elections moving at any speed." Politicians starting to study theoretical physics....
Reply
@Toobowlie
1 month ago
Weird analogy in the beginning but cool
Reply
@lincolnlad6075
6 months ago (edited)
DIrac did not spot - well certainly not immediately - that his equation predicted the existence of antimatter. It was simply the two roots of a quadratic and he just assummed the other solution might represent the proton though of course it didn't have the same mass. The symmetry of matter came later.
Reply
@twinwankel
6 months ago
I have no idea how you can rank Dirac's equation as the world's most beautiful. It looks no more beautiful than Einstein's Field Equation or Maxwell's equations. Or other famous results in the history of Physics, Math or Engineering.
1
Reply
@LiborTinka
6 months ago
Way too often we give credit to visible and outspoken people with high self-esteem but we also too often overlook much more brilliant people just because they are quiet.
1
Reply
@snafu5563
6 months ago
I always love your video biographies
Reply
@benquinneyiii7941
6 months ago
Einstein thought he was nuts
4
Reply
2 replies
@crazieeez
6 months ago
He proved Schdonginer equation is wrong. And fixed it. Further, some body fixed his equation because it didn’t account for lamb shift. Pretty crazy how quantum mechanics in the early 1900 is so much different than it is now. It basically is something new. In fact, should be called Something New.
Reply
@JohnRowsell
5 months ago
Paul Dirac and Cary Grant went to the same primary school in Bristol
Reply
@LuisAldamiz
6 months ago
He's the one I admire the most, along with Einstein surely, of all that bunch. And after watching this video, I like him even better.
However I understand his feeling of failure, because if he could have got that equation fully working, we'd know so much more about the fundamentals of Reality! Instead we're stuck with Schrödinger's, which is objectively not even half as good.
2
Reply
1 reply
@calicoesblue4703
6 months ago
Do one on Gregory Perelman
1
Reply
@khanshrabon7802
6 months ago
Too successful to consider his life a success.
1
Reply
@hebertmartinez8956
1 month ago
I do love your channel! ❤
Reply
@SwingAndSway245WBC
6 months ago
The universe is not dominated by matter. Matter is only about 5% of the universe.
Reply
@norbertdapunt1444
1 month ago
Awesome.
Reply
@ryoung1111
5 months ago
7:28 “…due to the Pauli exclusion principle”?
Really? I think you need to rethink this idea, respectfully.
1
Reply
@fxy17
3 months ago
That's Euler's Identity formula.
Reply
@pontiuspilatus7900
6 months ago
Failure - Dirac's private life (in particular his upbringing) was obviously not quite ideal for him. A harsh father, the lock-up of his emotions, feelings mad him a prisoner in himself. Maybe he wouldn't have become what he became in other circumstances. I admire his achievements, and he probably admired the people who could express themselves in different ways.
By the way: I would appreciate metric measurements, because I have not much of an idea of the imperial ones. I am sure, other non-USA viewers would too.
1
Reply
1 reply
@Cornel1001
3 months ago
SU the remarkable singularity !
Reply
@muskyoxes
6 months ago
It infuriates me that Dirac's collected works have been published but is impossible to find
Reply
@josephyousif503
1 day ago
Great video .
Reply
@PedroFigueiredo-q9x
6 months ago
Missing details : Pauli said he feared the mathematical acrobatics of Dirac who bested him. The Big Bang theory and his calculation of the double magnetism of the electron are wrong. Dirac s sea of energy is a hallucination like his great number hypothesis.. The trivial fact that a*a=(-a)*(-a) proves no antimatter.. Dirac went to Florida as Britain forces retirees out of university once they reach the age, and the US does not. In Florida somebody asked who was the lady and he said it is Wigner s sister. He said marrying her was his greatest mistake. He did not want to become Sir, as he abhorred being called Sir Paul. After his death she lied saying known atheist, Dirac had become Christian, so he could be buried in Westminster. He is superficially admired for the wrong reasons. Humble and soft spoken Dirac deserves our admiration for having included special relativity in Quantum Mechanics, pursued mathematical beauty and integrity . It is a pity seeing the nihilistic look in his face at the end of his life, same for Weinberg.
Reply
@questionreality6003
6 months ago
great job, ma'am
Reply
@FM-yq8yfXYZ
5 months ago
Only one of a billion may leave footprints in science.
Reply
@DavidButler-m4j
3 months ago
The statement that the universe is dominated by matter is incorrect in that standard matter makes up only 5% of the universe. 5% of something doesn't dominate.
Reply
@manuelteixeira2496
1 month ago
The answer lies In The Supreme Creator's Power to keep the universe balanced with its constants known and unknown
Reply
@ResoluteExecutioner
5 months ago
Quite Amazing
Reply
@Andy-df5fj
5 months ago
At 8:45, why didn't the positron annihilate when it passed through the lead plate?
1
Reply
1 reply
@bekind2047
6 months ago (edited)
It’s amazing that his father was able to instill the deepest believe in him to be a failure and at the end of his amazing life he even found the explanation for this deep believe in his great work - l think it’s called a projection. There he missed the point. Kind of horrible to see how mighty parents can be. In a sense he lived the same fate as his brother but wasn’t able to kill himself over it. So he did it his way.
Reply
@stoneysauce
5 months ago
anti-matter is just matter thats been subjected to so much energy that it travels backwards in time.
Reply
@Success4u247
4 months ago
A humble man
Reply
@fusionfan6883
6 months ago
Ironically it’s Dirac’s multi disciplined studies, particularly in engineering, that helped him to approach physics problems from a unique perspective. As to his odd behaviour, it is almost certain he was on the autistic spectrum.
Reply
@M0rph1sm
6 months ago
Fatherly decisions and influences do not always make sense. Nonetheless having a Father or Daddy who gives you a home and is sometimes observably “there for you” often leads to a more “normally distributed” life.
1
Reply
1 reply
@u3b93
6 months ago
@6:29 instead of electrons you wrote ELECTIONS . . .
1
Reply
@IoanaNoemyToma
6 months ago
One Love, one sign.
Reply
@gauranshbansal
2 months ago
7:05, the 4th person from the left end (well right end from their perspective) of the third row from the bottom, that dude , the hell is he upto?
Reply
@catalin.
6 months ago
6:29 it says "elections" instead of "electrons"
1
Reply
1 reply
@davidschneide5422
6 months ago
6:27 subliminal suggestion to vote in the 2024 electron
Reply
@jamesdelb6885
6 months ago
I guess the annihilation of matter upon the electron and positron contact forms energy that goes in both realms, the positrons and the electrons?
Reply
@ktrethewey
2 months ago
Why the music? Ditch it.
1
Reply
@SaintsofAvalon
6 months ago (edited)
Greatest equation is M+D=B1 / B2 / B3 etc....
Without we wouldn't be here ! ...
Reply
@HighMojo
6 months ago
It seems to me that Dirac's hypothesis of a positive hole is not the same as a positive particle.
An electron hole would result in a net charge of zero, not positive.
Even though Dirac was right in his math, and it's prediction that something positive must exist, it is not the hole.
1
Reply
1 reply
@curlyhum1276
4 months ago
der-rack failed to make the link or connection of the electron and photon in a simple equation like E-MC^2, he was honest, his prize for the antimatter is amazing and why he was credited! all of them want the equation of everything over every field in the unified dark mass/ dark energy space time scalar fractal fabric Matrix! or as i call it, E^2=E^2
Reply
@jtinalexandria
5 months ago
A beautiful mind...
Reply
@nayanendumisra6764
6 months ago
An excellent Biopic on Paul Dirac. Thank you Madam 🎉❤😂.
Reply
@wcsxwcsx
5 months ago
And through it all, no one ever noticed he was autistic. That's how it goes.
Reply
@lanzer22
6 months ago
I see newsthink, I click. I call this the anti-garbage principle.
3
Reply
@paulrandall9705
2 months ago
Why the silly music; does someone think that what Cindy has to say couldn’t possibly hold our attention?
1
Reply
@lookingouthere
6 months ago
Lovely video
Reply
@mblaber2000
4 months ago
Mads Mikkelsen could play Dirac’s father
Reply
@Pumpkinblimp
1 month ago
After the Nobel and to Science generally with accomplishments it would seem that PAM Dirac also distinguished himself on this occasion as being a knit wit. This time through empirical observation...
Reply
@onehitpick9758
2 months ago
Most of the antimatter is just over the horizon. Some of it is close by, trapped in things like protons.
Reply
@tacoterpstra8263
3 weeks ago
to admit to pure cowardice, shows he was wise as well
Reply
@hughdoyle7059
4 months ago
There is a black and white photograph included in this great video. It includes a lot of clergymen. Anyone have any idea who the group is?
Reply
@aratimandal6940
5 months ago
Alpha decay when positron occurred for momentum of bita decay
Reply
@rockfan9719
4 months ago (edited)
Dirac was genius but the most creative physicist of that time was Werner Heisenberg. He found first formulation of QM, the 'Matrix Mechanics' (Steven Weinberg says that discovering it was 'pure mathematical magic'). Heisenberg found also the most significant rule of quantum physics, the 'Heisenberg's Uncertainty Relation'. Also he founded QFT together with Pauli. It was not Dirac! Dirac Theory allows just half-numbered spins (and it's acc. Weinberg even not correct because capturing negative energies). Heisenberg created the first model of atom kernel introducing very abstract concept of 'Isospin" that got a major role in SM of partical physics. He also participated together with Bohr, Born, Pauli at standard interpretation of quantum physics, so-called 'Copenhagener's Interpretation". Dirac never worked on interpretation questions.
Reply
@hardlyb
6 months ago
If he was a failure, I'm not sure what the word is for my career.
1
Reply
@omartusson
6 months ago
$2.00
Thanks!
Reply
Newsthink
·
1 reply
@icyy2015
6 months ago
lovely vid, but the most beautiful equation is euler's identity
1
Reply
1 reply
@faisalsheikh7846
6 months ago
I think it's Euler's identity
1
Reply
@ЂорђеПавличић
6 months ago
Sounds like a cool dude. But yea, "imagine what that means for the rest of us" and then cube it...
1
Reply
@pangeaproxima3681
6 months ago
Background music so unnecesary.
1
Reply
@ManyHeavens42
5 months ago
You left out String Theory
hahaha
1
Reply
@wicky4473
6 months ago
Minor comment… might want to correct written text at around 6:35.
Excellent programme though!
Reply
@youutubestinks4580
6 months ago
when mathematicians and else mix their ego and pedantry they begin to call 'elegant and beauty' to their own discoveries
Reply
@vudu8ball
6 months ago
If the spaceships ever come to save humanity from themselves, to take humans to a better world they will take people like Dirac. The rest of humanity comes off like a herd of cows chewing their cuds in a field and will be treated accordingly.
Reply
@TheBluePhoenix008
2 days ago
The world's smartest people were all alive at the same time lol
Reply
@jceepf
2 months ago (edited)
Professional physicists know how great he was... it is sad that he is totally unknown to the general public...
Reply
@jscanl
6 months ago
7:01 Eamonn De Valera....1st Prime Minister of Ireland, after achieving independence from the UK...around 1921. What's his pic doing in this story?
Reply
1 reply
@JUST.ICE24
4 months ago
Good good job
Reply
@Joe-jv5mm
6 months ago
Japanese philosopher's beat Paul Dirac 💡 of antimatter by centuries ☯️😉 and all it took was sitting quietly watching nature
1
Reply
@FaradjiBoubekri
3 months ago
هناك افراد متميزون مثل بول ديراك. عندما يتقبلهم العالم الخارجي يصبحون اكثر تميّزا. في عالمنا العربي لا نتقبل الاختفال فما بالك ان تكون متميّزا !!!!
Reply
@dotjaremko
6 months ago
I recall Dirac saying he didn't read books because it got in the way of thinking
1
Reply
@Ian-lx1iz
6 months ago
'...moving at any speed'? Mr Dirac? (6:27)
As we've all experienced, elections move incredibly slowly. Painfully so!
As erstwhile British Prime Minister Harold Wilson observed:
'A week is a long time, in politics'
Reply
@oksanaorehova3257
4 months ago
exp(i pi) + 1 = 0 is the world most beautiful equation. It links e, pi, imaginary i, 1, and 0.
Reply
@benquinneyiii7941
6 months ago
Rationalism
2
Reply
@suninmoon4601
6 months ago
Theories are fun and all, but can you please explain how can there be anti-matter without matter? Throughout the history of science, no one has ever come up with any "matter." The Greeks tried with "atomos", but as we all know that theory didn't hold up very long.
So, until someone can come up with some "matter", the question of anti-matter produces only further confusion. Unless, of course, you want to argue that by INVOKING matter, anti-matter arises through implication. Simple duality.
Ultimately, however, both amount to nothing more than phantasmagoria.
Reply
@arnaudjean1159
6 months ago
"Les mots vrais "traversent le temps mais pas "les mauvais" 😊
That means True words stand the test of time, but bad people do not.
Your channel is very good ,I subs
Best wishes.❤
Reply
@TheHaamii
12 days ago
Asymmetry between matter and antimatter is not explained at the end of the video.
Reply
@MalvinderKaur-e7x
6 months ago
Physicist or others still cannot understand or explain perfect symmatry found in nature something as simple as flower petals in perfect sync numbers
Reply
@AsadAf-rs1mm
5 months ago
there's no anti matter.
1
Reply
@charlesdrury9712
6 months ago
It’s not a truly spoon as we think of it as convoluted spin
Reply
@mustafabayulgen4357
6 months ago
I thought the most beautiful one was Euler's Identity
Reply
@TheDeacon0429
6 months ago
I'm at ~5:00 and based on what I'm hearing, calling anti-matter the opposite of matter is incorrect. It would be more appropriate to refer to it as "the absence of matter" holding an opposite/attractive polar charge... Sorry my brain makes very interesting connections occasionally and I think I'm at the entrance to a rabbit hole
Reply
@galarascu1509
4 days ago
He was a true genius, head and shoulders above plagiarist Einstein
Reply
@vishalrander9805
6 months ago
Tribute to selfless Dirac❤❤❤
Reply
@shivadasa
6 months ago
Are the electron and positron annihilated, or do they simply change form?
Reply
@user-zb4wh3ks2e
4 months ago
Physics is not magical.
1
Reply
@mikejones9961
6 months ago
nice to see a narrator without a beard and baseball cap
Reply
@ericchristen2623
6 months ago
Good. First step to becoming an artist in his next life. 😊
Reply
@st.charlesstreet9876
6 months ago
His brilliant mind open up a whole universe in another dimension. Hats off and MGBY Sir!
Reply
@biffedya
5 months ago
it's the Vanna White of equations.
Reply
@janklaas6885
6 months ago (edited)
📍10:40
2📍8:41
Reply
@stevel9678
6 months ago
Nice biographical sketch. But for a vid titled "the world's most beautiful equation," you barely showed his equation in unreadable script, and said nothing about it. You could have at least made the effort.
3
Reply
1 reply
@rob876
6 months ago
The asymmetry of matter vs. antimatter is only a mystery if it is assumed that the universe came about from nothing - but then there is still the mystery of what was that something? Could there not have been the opposite giving rise to an antimatter universe? Perhaps the matter and antimatter universes both came into existence at the same time but one moving along the positive time axis and the other moving along the negative time axis.
Reply
@swoondrones
6 months ago
Nice story! :)
Reply
@mieczyslawherba2723
1 month ago
Kohberger wants to delay the trial as much as possible, and eventually pack as much Jews into the Jury as possible. He is a Jew, so it would give him a chance to survive. There is not so much Jews in Moscow, they live in bigger cities. This is why we see attempts to move the trial to a bigger city.
Reply
@Chewligan1
6 months ago (edited)
"My life has been a failure". He says with a Nobel prize in his pocket. Well mine is clearly a disaster !!! I would guess his difficult upbringing gave him a low opinion of himself !
Reply
@rongeorge574
6 months ago
there is no such thing as an attractive force, only a repulsion force, and an acceleration force, which is only perceived to be Gravity and it is why the universe is expanding, and the edges of the universe are moving faster then the center of the universe. All objects containing heat emit energy that travels in a straight line, larger things like planet earth act as a shield of the total sum of all forces of the universe, since everything in the universe is emitting energy waves, the edges are accelerating creating gravity appearence on the far side, and no gravity on the poles, so there are no planets on the edge of the universe only arcs, and black holes are where matter disappears
1
Reply
@JimCrossan
6 months ago
Indeed beautiful... now explain gravity?
Reply
@michaellewis1209
5 months ago
The most beautiful equation is Einstein’s E=M*c*c. We don’t need new equations. We just have to finish Einstein’s work. We have all the data necessary to prove it. It should take little time to prove existing science is wrong.
The solution is spacetime. The 4th dimensional equivalent to volume = length * width * height * time. The answer is sitting right in front of us. How did we ever miss it!!
Reply
3 replies
@tadeth
6 months ago (edited)
I thought it’s a proton exit that changes the atom to positron, not an electron exit that rather leaves an atom positively charged. Are they the same?
Reply
@JohnDerhammer
1 month ago
Tesla still rules. Alternating Current, infrasonic seismic inducer and magnetohydrodynamic propulsion.
Reply
@ozkurede
4 months ago
why do you play music while you talk?
3
Reply
1 reply
@NoiRosales
4 months ago
Interesting ❤❤
Reply
@AB-jm3iu
4 weeks ago
God I love your voice, you might consider being a tv host
Reply
@walternullifidian
4 months ago
Imagine that, a positive menace discovering the positron! 🤓
Reply
@NEWDAWNrealizingself
5 months ago
🟦🔴🟦 THANKS ! THE GREAT MIND SAW THE BEAUTY IN THE WORLD OF MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION AND CONSECUTIVELY ANTIPARTICLES CAME INTO BEING . 🟦🔴🟦
1
Reply
@GIobeCentral
6 months ago
Thanks for the sub tittles.
Reply
@ytrrs
6 months ago
Very depressing story. I feel like hitting on the head of Dirac's father. He destroyed the lives of his two sons!
Reply
@Anamnesia
6 months ago
Agnostic is a position of 'Knowledge', not a position of 'Belief'... You can be an Agnostic Christian, meaning; You Believe in 'God', but you do not know if God is Real, or not.
To say Paul Dirac was Agnostic says that he does not know if something is true...
A Theist is a person who believes that 'God' (or gods) exists... An Atheist is a person who does not believe that 'God' (or gods) exists...
1
Reply
1 reply
@rathnec
6 months ago
I assume that you are talking about Rutherford, not Bhor.
Reply
@marfmarfalot5193
5 months ago
10/10!
Reply
@esaholmberg
2 months ago
How do you explain the positronic robot brains by Asimov... ;)
Reply
@u2b83
6 months ago (edited)
4:17 "His father forced him [Dirac's brother] into engineering, Miserable, and making little money." Go STEM! lol ...seriously man, you gotta do it for the love, not the money. Power bumbling people recently ran engineering into the ground via Girardian copying, getting people into the field for the wrong reason. Ditto for MDs.
At the core of Girard's theory is the idea that human desires are imitative; we want things because we see others wanting them. This isn't just about material goods but extends to aspirations, goals, and careers. The push towards professions in STEM and medicine can be seen as a manifestation of mimetic desire. Society values these professions highly, not just for their intrinsic benefits to humanity but also for their perceived prestige and financial rewards. As more people pursue these fields in response to societal cues, the original desire is obscured, replaced by a mimetic cycle where choices are increasingly driven by the observation of others' desires rather than personal passion or aptitude.
Rivalry and Conflict
Girard suggests that as individuals imitate each other's desires, they become rivals competing for the same objects or goals. In the professional context, this can lead to an oversaturated job market, where the competition for positions, prestige, and financial rewards intensifies. This rivalry can degrade the quality of the profession itself, as the focus shifts from innovation and genuine service to outcompeting others for the sake of personal gain or status. It may also contribute to personal misery, as seen in the example of Dirac's brother, who, driven into a field not of his choosing, experiences dissatisfaction and lack of fulfillment.
Scapegoat Mechanism
When mimetic rivalry escalates, Girard posits that communities seek to restore harmony by identifying a scapegoat to blame and expel. In the discussion of careers in STEM and medicine, those who question the value of pursuing these fields for status or money rather than a genuine call to the profession might be marginalized or ridiculed. Alternatively, the system itself, which promotes such rivalry and misplaced priorities, could be criticized without addressing the underlying mimetic desires and societal values
From a Girardian perspective, Felix Dirac's tragic end might be seen as resulting from a complex interplay of internalized mimetic desires, rivalry, and scapegoating, compounded by societal and familial pressures. Addressing the underlying causes of such dynamics—by fostering environments where individual worth is recognized apart from achievement and where diverse paths are valued, could have avoided Felix's demise.
1
Reply
@toucantoucan
6 months ago
Whats the music at the beginning ?
Reply
@javadfardaei7333
4 months ago
How could one-dimension equation represent three-dimension of nature?
Reply
@jeandellaquila8199
11 days ago
Antimatter had ten neutrons inside three envelopes of red matter energy fused asymmetrically in transfer..Of what only appeared as symmetric parallel matter ANTIMATTER51644isotope444STRONTIUM25.44410
Reply
@artsmith1347
6 months ago
What is with the series of click around 08:20?
Reply
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish
6 months ago
I had no idea he lived to see the 1980s im sure the disco music n then hair bands did him in now if he could of just lived until GNR appetite for descruction album came out he would have had enough energy for an extra 30-40 yrs
Reply
1 reply
@Mrinvincible37
6 months ago
Tyy
Reply
@operationpaperclip3952
6 months ago
Yes, but what does that make me if i havent got a degree like this man, yet fugured most of that out?
Reply
@markissboi3583
6 months ago
ok so it wasnt startrek
1
Reply
@flasheart49
6 months ago
It would be much easier to follow without the music.
1
Reply
1 reply
@stephen7774
6 months ago
The universe is made from only one particle. This particle has 3 states - left spin, right spin and no spin. That explains everything and there is no need for any stupid equations. lol!
Reply
@Mikedr55
6 months ago
the word is 'matter' not 'madder'.
Reply
@fritzold2444
6 months ago
commercials with science is the worst dish ever!
Reply
@escapefelicity2913
5 months ago
what were your hopes for that fuking background noise
1
Reply
@j.dunlop8295
6 months ago
Pretty mathematics, certainly not what my maths' teachers taught in highschool, fetish maths? Excellent?
Reply
@lawrencecole6527
6 months ago
Ugh, I hate non-answers; it's like a kind of sociopathy.
Reply
@smitty9733
5 months ago
If you raise God fearing successful children -- your life has been a success ! I truly hope his life was a success.
1
Reply
@DavidRobinson-rj2sp
6 months ago
Dirac was atheist NOT agnostic.
This is what he had to say about God:
I don't know why we are discussing religion. If we are honest—and scientists have to be—we must admit that religion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. The very idea of God is a product of the human imagination. It is quite understandable why primitive people, who were so much more exposed to the overpowering forces of nature than we are today, should have personified these forces in fear and trembling. But nowadays, when we understand so many natural processes, we have no need for such solutions. I can't for the life of me see how the postulate of an Almighty God helps us in any way. What I do see is that this assumption leads to such unproductive questions as to why God allows so much misery and injustice, the exploitation of the poor by the rich, and all the other horrors He might have prevented. If religion is still being taught, it is by no means because its ideas still convince us, but simply because some of us want to keep the lower classes quiet. Quiet people are much easier to govern than clamorous and dissatisfied ones. They are also much easier to exploit. Religion is a kind of opium that allows a nation to lull itself into wishful dreams and so forget the injustices that are being perpetrated against the people. Hence the close alliance between those two great political forces, the State and the Church. Both need the illusion that a kindly God rewards—in heaven if not on earth—all those who have not risen up against injustice, who have done their duty quietly and uncomplainingly. That is precisely why the honest assertion that God is a mere product of the human imagination is branded as the worst of all mortal sins.
Paul Dirac.
5
Reply
2 replies
@theoryandapplication7197
4 months ago
intresting
1
Reply
@ImogenC-rt3fm
4 months ago
Bon jour Etranger have ewe married me yet?
1
Reply
@EggTronics31
2 months ago
So he WAS the middle child. I guessed it only 30 seconds into the video. Because i am the middle one too. 😊
Reply
@somedooby
6 months ago
"Using real world data from Starbucks, Spotify, and X to train you to see trends and make better-informed decisions."
I feel like I have to ask... how would anyone know if those companies aren't using Brilliant's users to train the companies' own models? I know some companies have paid people in far away places like $0.05 per hour to train models... and this seems like a great opportunity to trick people into paying to train a company's model... I have nothing against Brilliant, but companies are tricky these days
Reply
1 reply
@mikefromspace
6 months ago
The equation is wrong. Antimatter was never observed. What they observed during the ion charge collapse was a simple re-organization event devoid of a singularity having multiple singularities as in imitated atomic cores/strong force points, due to the nature of the boson matrix we now know formats space everywhere. The solution to unification was never found approaching Euclid, but departing from it using projective geometry and or volumetric physics in a fully kinetic system. Why? It is the only system capable of recognizing the proven link to the forces in the prime spiral found by Azra Wind and to some degree by my friend Peter Plichta. The equation is a differential of confusion there, while in reality, you can have no confusion. Everything originates from the single force of time as in Electron Neutrino pressure as predicted and later proven by the Ice Cube evidence.
Reply
@jvjdrn
6 months ago
OG Introvert!
Reply
@kyintegralson9656
3 months ago
"Ramond", a French name, is pronounced "Ra-mond", not "Raymond".
Reply
@anatolipek8549
6 months ago
The Big Bang annihilation; 'only' energy, yet energy is interchangeable with matter...? Double Dutch as we say in the UK.
Reply
@whattheflyingfuck...
6 months ago
6:30 elections OR electrons
Reply
@maxwell617
5 months ago
Dont forget Uncle Matter .. they are relative ! 😮
Reply
@neilrichardson7454
5 months ago
Maybe, like einstein, he was on the autistic spectrum 🤔
1
Reply
@eugenehayden3571
6 months ago
I wonder what was his formula for a happy marriage.
Reply
@Number26ami
2 months ago
I have been led to believe that what we call the Universe may in fact be dominated by dark energy and dark matter, not "matter" per se, which is a minor component. However I am no good at maths........
Reply
@muzammalbaig
4 months ago
إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ سَرِيعُ ٱلۡحِسَابِ
Allah is the Mathematician of Highest order (Al-Quran 14:51)
And of everything, We have created pairs (Al-Quran 49:51)
Reply
1 reply
@countvlad8845
4 months ago
Interesting ideas and life, however, I don't see how his equation is considered the world's most beautiful equation. It suggests symmetry in the universe, but what has this to do with beauty?
Reply
@leemday5731
6 months ago (edited)
Im deselectic id give anything to be able to do even simple maths people dont understand whats itls like to have maths as life long enemy and not a freind
1
Reply
@joshuaferguson5756
4 months ago
I love your voice. Can you play that piano? If so, play for us sometime :)
Reply
@juskahusk2247
6 months ago
Is Dirac Equation related to Lawrence Equation?
Reply
@charlesdrury9712
6 months ago
Spoon should be spin
Reply
@crieliocriel
6 months ago
matter did not dominate our universe..
Reply
@t00by00zer
3 months ago
The big bang never happened.
Reply
1 reply
@bowlineobama
6 months ago
The concept of opposites has been known during the ancient time in China. Think of Yin Yang. One can't exist without the other. Only now that the physics of today discovery the dance of opposites, Yin Yang. That's funny.
1
Reply
@riverstun
4 months ago
So what does the equation say?
Reply
@markhughes7927
3 months ago
..sounds a very pleasant guy…a pity that the separation in time between his birth and that of Dr. Peter Plichta meant thar he did not have the possibility of conversationally interacting with him..
Reply
@LorelaiCarpenter
3 months ago
very good I like
Reply
@AliCameron-y9n
3 months ago
very good I like
Reply
@stoyanfurdzhev
6 months ago
Surprise surprise
1
Reply
@RogerFederer-ip9er
6 months ago
good
Reply
@charlesdrury9712
6 months ago
Spoon should be spoon
Reply
@oo0647
6 months ago
The big bang should have caused equal amounts of matter and anti-matter??? Alot of Science has been based on the premise that the universe is born of chance a random happening. Yet there is an Inherent design in all life. Does this not point to an orderly Creator?? Science and atheism are not mutually exclusive. Analyse all facts with impartiality.
1
Reply
1 reply
@shiva.chennai
6 months ago
He is right. I am also looking for that. If i am a positive entity where is my negative entity in the universe. If i am 1 there must be zero. I want to know that who i am in the pair of my entity. I say i am not 1. I maybe 1,0 or one and zero. Where is my zero. I feel my first entity may be a zero entity.But there must be my another entity in the universe.
1
Reply
@davidleesn
4 months ago
wow
Reply
@rayrocher6887
5 months ago
His work was Magnificent. But some other Physicists - are suppose to find the other universe mysteries, time for another Great Hero. sorry - math not perfect - yet.
Reply
@adrianaugustus2815
1 month ago (edited)
Would have been nice to spend a bit of time explaining the equation, and perhaps that Dyson, Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga "dealt with the infinities" in developing quantum electrodynamics. Typical AI output.
Reply
@philnewton3096
6 months ago
Why the piano music. Can we hve beauty in separate courses please?
Reply
@EyeQue62
5 months ago
I was quite enjoying the video until about 5:30. Then she said "Miles an hour". I despise the use of Imperial/United States customary units/Freedumb units. Science is Metric.
Reply
@JoshuaFalken-cy3dv
6 months ago
can you please stop playing the piano while talking??????!!!!
1
Reply
@vijayanand8077
4 months ago
❤❤❤❤
1
Reply
@rockfan9719
4 months ago
the most beautiful equation is Einsteins E = m * c*c
Reply
@charlesdrury9712
6 months ago
I have been enter science since I was a little boy I have no degrees I don’t want to false a give me the impression that I’m intelligent but I love science so much I learn without really trying the negative side of it nobody is interested in it my friends my parents teacher coworkers nobody likes and nobody understands it like I do at the same time I go to the bank and I put the wrong decimal point down so I have always had a learning problem I never graduated from any grade 1 to 9 but I found out I can learn so I spent my life studying everything I’m 76 now my brain is not working too well but now I know about the universe how it works subatomic Ray
Reply
@arturoeugster7228
6 months ago
Salar de Uyuni en el sur de Bolivia
Reply
1 reply
@vinniepeterss
6 months ago
❤❤
1
Reply
@wololo10
5 months ago
Navier-stokes is more beautiful
Reply
@pedrorodrigues7285
6 months ago
The inverse T.
Reply
@klembokable
2 months ago (edited)
Holy shit i can tell a woman wrote this script, thanks for letting me know how unloved he was as a child. If only i were more neglected i too could elegantly describe the universe
1
Reply
1 reply
@stephenstretch00
6 months ago
not a mystery
Reply
@juanferbriceno4411
6 months ago
I hear your distress
Reply
@gr637
4 months ago
Can an equation really be discovered?
Reply
1 reply
@atticuswalker
4 months ago
i know where the antimatter is. and why it pops into the now when particles are smashed. i can tell you where to find it if your intrested. but iffunding the search is more profitable. i understand.
Reply
1 reply
@anthonybaransky137
6 months ago
Matter is energy just in solid form🙂 E=mc^2. Lol🙂🙂🙂
1
Reply
@drbilldixon4421
4 months ago
Very distracting and pointless muzak
1
Reply
@kennethbransford820
6 months ago
Revelation 4 : 11 “You are worthy, Jehovah our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created.” ===
2
Reply
@paulwebb6914
6 months ago
How'd that work out for the rest of humanity??...living in the REAL world...🤔
Reply
1 reply
@the_great_plague
1 month ago
anoone?
Reply
@johnrowland9570
2 months ago
These speculations always use the words probably, possibly, plausiblly, perhaps and presumably. Thus there are no facts. I am disappointed with you Sabine.
Reply
@AnuwktootLee-yf9ff
4 months ago
As my mother mad father Anukriti Paul damin ram dervied nas still ishwr ka ayrtra jaga te hye Sigi’s aye huye jiitw hai ajiutw huye Damian girlfriend ko jiitw huye
1
Reply
@Hubert-Schmitz
1 month ago
Lots of words. But where is the formula?
Reply
@RicksterX-92fs
6 months ago
The sponsor Brilliant is a joke. Don’t waste your money thinking you’ll learn something new.
Reply
@JohnSmendrovac
2 months ago
1921
Reply
@-Neutron-Star
4 months ago
I thought this video was about Equation, but it goes into a very somber narrative of how miserable Pauls childhood was! I was bored and i quit watching it.
Reply
@NoiRosales
4 months ago
Im inlove with you too❤❤
1
Reply
@itsonlyapapermoon61
6 months ago
Dancing Wu Li Masters, 📚
Reply
@thePlum
6 months ago
Who else is here because of Eric Weinstein??
Reply
1 reply
@marcbiff2192
6 months ago
Misgendering a noun??
Reply
@davidrandell2224
6 months ago
The expanding electrons/atoms do it all. No negative anything has ever existed except in silly human brains. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything. The “Atomic Expansion Equation “ far more important/interesting than Dirac’s noise.
Reply
@PatrickOfTav
6 months ago
Why do people think it necessary to present serious scientific videos with background music? It adds nothing and makes what is being said harder to hear and take in. This video may well be interesting but I can't continue to watch it.
Reply
@KimEdwards-ko9ev
6 months ago
😊
1
Reply
@tomasprochazka1437
1 month ago
Is this video entirly AI produced? 😂
Reply
@frhansmeyer
5 months ago
.l….😊😊😊,::;;
Pookkjjjjhhhhbbb. Nmmmmmmmmmmm,m,k,,,,,,llllllllllllllll
Reply
@pffffffffft406
2 months ago
Would people STOP putting ridiculous background music in their videos!!!
Reply
@JoshuaFalken-cy3dv
6 months ago
enough of that. I'm outta here. that piano music is just too annoying. impossible to continue listening 👎
Reply
@ericw3517
6 months ago
There's nothing beautiful about equations. They are just something you have to memorize for exams.
Reply
@chaosopher23
6 months ago
Are theoretical physicists real, or just a theory? 😁
Reply
@bgold2007
1 month ago
This clip is nothing
Reply
@luckylu9890
6 months ago
👍
Reply
@nzbrotrev9028
6 months ago
You + pray + repentance = Salvation in Christ Jesus.
Reply
@innosanto
6 months ago
Dirac is no2 of 20th century after Einstein.
1
Reply
@lakshya4876
6 months ago
Cool video, but dude you sound like AI
Reply
@sergiomanzetti1021
6 months ago
Such a silly terminology: Equations are not beautiful, WOMEN are.
Reply
@franciscopadilla1878
2 days ago
This is fake, i thought of the antimatter to physics.
Reply
1 reply
@grahamconquer8117
6 months ago
I sit and. Write code alone at home doingg math i want to hear what the things thngs travelling faster than the speed of light and thee new science
Reply
@arthurjones9201
5 months ago
Behaviour of elections ? Check your spelling please
Reply
@jessewolf7649
6 months ago
E=mc^2 gets my vote.
Reply
@evergreenwu
6 months ago
You mispronounced uyuni
Reply
@barrycook5607
1 month ago
Dreadful "fake" presentation of an enthralling subject! Thumb down and will block this channel.
Reply
@TheGrimStoic
6 months ago
Euler's is most profound, imho...
1
Reply
@mohdmukeem6497
2 hours ago
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Reply
@meherbaba-godman7483
6 months ago
😍😍🤩🤩🥰🥰
1
Reply
@ScrtyEmmer
6 months ago
Could you please breath between sentences!
Reply
@alfiedotwtf
6 months ago
Most beautiful? Euler has entered the chat
Reply
1 reply
@JanPBtest
6 months ago
It's a very nice equation but the most beautiful? Hardly. (Assuming such a thing as "the most beautiful equation" exists, the concept sounds sophomoric to me, like "the best novel" or "the best painting".)
Reply
@michelangelope830
6 months ago
God is literally everything that exist and God created the universe, what is not understood? God is not to be worshipped, obeyed and feared, that makes reality perfection. The universe is alive. Do you like God? If you don't like to worship Allah why do you try to persuade others your God is perfection when he is not perfect for you? God is easy to explain and impossible to understand because we can not comprehend infinitude, and infinitude exists because from nothing can not be created something. Reality is eternal and the universe can not be eternal logically, therefore something eternal created the universe from self, because from nothing can not be created something. To understand reality you have to ask rationally why God created life. I hope to hear from you. I am literally God and I am not hiding. Thank you.
Reply
@XXfea
6 months ago
Lets practice making babies!! - this is SO EXCITING
Reply
@AnuwktootLee-yf9ff
4 months ago
Famiky me rehte huyyw support kartw shut humeaha ke lit ye Hakka mae Kama hum aagw jiitw huye physics patents ka nam aagw badanhege huye
Reply
@indomitablereasoning2875
1 month ago
ALL mumbo jumbo quacks from the usual world of vocational training liar's AKA quantum mechanics a😂😂😂😂
Reply
@arturoarredondo4947
4 months ago
Traducir please 😂😅
Reply
@ezioberolo2936
6 months ago
The electron is NOT a sub atomic particle!!!
1
Reply
3 replies
@NoiRosales
4 months ago
Like a lonely man ❤❤❤hehehe
Reply
@pappaflammyboi5799
6 months ago (edited)
Seriously... You guys are going to run this channel as pure AI GPT4 chatbot garbage??? Even the presenter isn't real! Gads!!!
Reply
@TonyStark-mm6qy
6 months ago
Missing out SRINIVASA RAMANUJAN when talking about world's most beautiful equation shows humanity that Thanos was right !!!!! 😤
Reply
2 replies
@pushpindermann4139
4 months ago
💯🧞⚡💥😀
Reply
@AnuwktootLee-yf9ff
4 months ago
Swinger Shirdi gbein se paurbaradatw hhyw
Reply
@AnuwktootLee-yf9ff
4 months ago
Jiitw hhyw aage badate huye D aap abate Shute shit boktw gye jitte huye
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment