Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong

Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong The Royal Institution 1.4M subscribers Subscribe 80K Share Download Thanks Clip Save 5,949,269 views Feb 15, 2017 According to our best theories of physics, the fundamental building blocks of matter are not particles, but continuous fluid-like substances known as 'quantum fields'. David Tong explains what we know about these fields, and how they fit into our understanding of the Universe. Watch the Q&A here: • Q&A - Quantum Fields: The Real Buildi... Subscribe for regular science videos: http://bit.ly/RiSubscRibe David Tong is a professor of theoretical physics at Cambridge University, specialising in quantum field theory. The Ri is on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ri_science and Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/royalinstitution and Tumblr: http://ri-science.tumblr.com/ Our editorial policy: http://www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po... Subscribe for the latest science videos: http://bit.ly/RiNewsletter Key moments View all Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript The Royal Institution 1.4M subscribers Videos About 56:28 Quantum Physics and Universal Beauty - with Frank Wilczek by The Royal Institution 515 Ri Talks by The Royal Institution Shop the The Royal Institution store Ri legends black tote bag $14.59 Teemill Men's The Dreams of an Astronaut t-shirt $24.31 Teemill Men's The dreams of an Astronaut hoody $48.61 Teemill Men's Our galaxy t-shirt $24.31 Teemill Men's Standard Model white t-shirt $24.31 Teemill Men's Fibonacci t-shirt $24.30 Teemill 6,741 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @TheRoyalInstitution Pinned by The Royal Institution @TheRoyalInstitution 4 years ago Thanks to our community, we now have Galician subtitles for this video! 752 Reply 141 replies @TheRoyalInstitution @TheRoyalInstitution 6 years ago We have some excellent fans with extensive language skills. David Tong's quantum fields can now also be enjoyed in German, Finnish and Spanish. Thank you all! 459 Reply The Royal Institution · 46 replies @Ambienfinity @Ambienfinity 1 year ago I watch a lot of physics and cosmology lectures, and this is one of the best I've ever seen. David's enthusiasm and knowledge are brilliant. 258 Reply 4 replies @rosemars8 @rosemars8 1 year ago I planned to only watch the first 10 min or so but got hooked throughout the end of the talk. What a nice a clear introduction of the topic by telling and combining all small, meaningful stories together. Just one of the best lectures I can think of......!!!!!!! 89 The Royal Institution Reply 2 replies @ishantishant8630 @ishantishant8630 1 year ago This man speaks with such an enthusiasm that he doesn't seem to be a theoretical physicist......he seems like the student whose mind is still wandering with questions and doubts on the concepts of physics ......the way he speaks is really amazing and the thing he did with the magnets in the middle of the lecture was something we all did in our childhood and he still has that energy and curiosity about something is really deeply hidden. 132 Reply 6 replies @cameront4729 @cameront4729 1 year ago Honoured to have David Tong as my lecturer this term, such a great teacher. 82 Reply 8 replies @Jiminio21 @Jiminio21 1 year ago The best 1 hour i had on YouTube. I studied mathematics and finance but my big love is physics. That session has broaden my horizons toward my big love. It made my whole understanding of the subject solid and explained a lot of issues that I had on my mind toward it. Physics is the past the present and the future. Thank you sir 29 Reply 2 replies @TheRoyalInstitution @TheRoyalInstitution 6 years ago Thanks to a very kind Nordic friend, we now have Finnish subtitles for this video! Kiitoksia oikein paljon! 39 Reply 2 replies @vickylee7996 @vickylee7996 1 year ago I wish I got a physics teacher like Prof. Tong when I was young, he motivated me to study Physics in this one-hour lecture ! Thx Professor ! 44 Reply 1 reply @paulsmith5720 @paulsmith5720 1 month ago This guy's enthusiasm and knowledge of the subject shines through. I wish the lecturers were like this in my younger days. Outstanding stuff. Thanks for posting. 1 Reply @uzulim9234 @uzulim9234 1 year ago Love David's lecture notes immensely. He packs in a great amount of intuition, insight and precision. 19 Reply @mamawright156 @mamawright156 1 year ago I have just listened to this with my 8yo and our simple minds are blown. I love quantum theory but haven't had much of an opportunity to explore it to any effect. This talk was wonderful to listen. The lecturers passion was felt and easy to get caught up in. Admittedly my 8yo had to retire half way through to process but he is eager to hear the rest in the morning. I shall be looking for more talks on this by this man 😁 12 Reply @ola5025 @ola5025 11 months ago (edited) I love all the energy and the enthusiasm that this professor engages in explaining in such a charming way some of the most difficult concepts of physics. Brilliant! I wish that there were more professionals like him, with all his pasion for knowledge and his desire to share his knowledge with other people! A big, big THANK YOU for this excellent lesson! Best of luck! 4 Reply @vancouverterry9142 @vancouverterry9142 2 years ago Ahhhhh, what a great teacher! Men like Professor Tong can lift up an age! And to have Royal Institution lectures by such brilliant individuals available free online is really the height of civilization. 353 Reply 4 replies @metameta1427 @metameta1427 8 months ago This is one of my favorite presentations on this channel. I come back often and rewatch and never of tire of the presenter's infectious spirit and detailed explanations. Thanks to RI for being one of the best channels on this platform. 3 Reply @Kei-pj1vg @Kei-pj1vg 5 months ago Fantastic lecture! Thank you for making this available. I am non-physicist (non-scientist for that matter) but have recently become very interested in quantum theory because of my love of sci-fi books. I’ve been searching a video that a layperson like myself can relate (and watch more than 10 min) and Prof. Tong had done a phenomenal job!!! 5 Reply @rezzer7918 @rezzer7918 1 year ago The most honest clear and complete summary on the current state of theoretical physics I have seen. Bravo 👍 9 Reply @dwcscca @dwcscca 1 year ago This was such a phenomenal lecture and so enjoyable. Usually these concepts are so abstract I can't wrap my head around them to actually enjoy thinking about them but the lecture here was just outstanding. 8 Reply @ImranSahir1 @ImranSahir1 1 year ago This is one of those lectures that you think you'll see for first two minutes and then the two minutes stretch up to an hour with some weird space-time magic. Fabulous! 34 Reply @d.c.gottardo6771 @d.c.gottardo6771 3 years ago Ri please, give this man another chance to talk more about others subjects. This lecture was amazing. 1.7K The Royal Institution Reply 31 replies @riverfreddy @riverfreddy 11 months ago Thank you, Mr. Tong. I am listening to and thinking about this lecture for the third time. Your abilities to transfer your intellectual content is refreshing. I wish these ideas, structured into logical concepts, had heen available when I was out of highschool in the 70s. Freddy Chavré of Maple Valley 6 Reply @nancebreen4737 @nancebreen4737 1 year ago Fascinating! He makes the complex simple, and the unfathomable, a topic for discussion. Great teacher. 6 Reply @teebo_fr_en_it @teebo_fr_en_it 1 year ago I for one find David Tong extremely understandable. The man nails points one by one without fluff and with the right amount of energy to keep me engaged. I wish my physics teachers had been like him! I had one who was the most soporific substance known to mankind. Either way, amazing video, I am very grateful for it! 3 Reply 1 reply @bigB7367 @bigB7367 1 year ago Your lecture is awesome. Very clear explanations, If only I had you as my physics teacher in school. 5 Reply @NathanielHarari @NathanielHarari 1 year ago It was absolutely extraordinary watching this lecture just now, realizing that David Tennant had reprised his role in educating people as The Doctor. 😃👍 But seriously, he does look a bit like David Tennant and his lectures are fascinating. I absolutely adored it. Thank you again, RI, for putting all of these up online. 25 Reply 1 reply @let4be @let4be 3 years ago Absolutely brilliant lecture - exactly what I was looking for! The shine in the lector's eyes and his enthusiasm clearly shows that he adores his job and physics! Thanks for this generous contribution to the spreading of knowledge :) I can only imagine how many young minds will get excited watching this, most certainly it will influence path of some people :) 306 The Royal Institution Reply 5 replies @KnottDanny @KnottDanny 8 months ago Absolutely brilliant lecture. I’ve never been even close to understanding quantum physics, but now feel I have a mental model that makes some sort of sense. Thank you. 3 Reply @collinfraser1218 @collinfraser1218 1 year ago I rained as electronic technologist, turned , retired as business owner, so always fascinated by what I did not know. Curiosity survived, at his lecture makes me feel I am not hopeless. Extremely well done, thank you Sir ! 🇨🇦🙏🇺🇦 1 Reply @benswanson2301 @benswanson2301 8 months ago One of the best lectures that I have ever come across. I typically listen to lectures while I am working or exercising, which is how I first experienced this lecture. Something compelled me to watch it. The computer imaging of "empty" space is mind-blowing. Fantastic! 1 Reply @galehawkins101 @galehawkins101 1 year ago Amazing content and presentation. Now at the age of 71 and having the benefits the pandemic slow down to read books and mine resources like YouTube Quantum Mechanics is becoming somewhat understandable for me. Some of things in ancient writings are starting to make sense that I had written off ever understanding. 41 Reply 6 replies @ijustwanttolikecomments4677 @ijustwanttolikecomments4677 1 year ago ive watched many science videos as a hobby, about cosmology, physics, etc...and all the quantum talk in those videos i will now understand better because of this lecture. thank you! i wish i could like this video many many times! 6 Reply @hosseynshanbehzaadeh9342 @hosseynshanbehzaadeh9342 1 year ago How I, a student of Persian literature living in Iran, was fascinated by this guy's lecture. I'm truly astonished that I actually understood most parts of this, and really, really enjoyed it. Lots of love from Iran. Thank you sir. You truly deserve Faraday's throne. ❤️ 164 Reply 15 replies @TheRetroEngine @TheRetroEngine 1 year ago Wow I was mesmerised, such a great talk, easily digested, and his energy and passion seeped through. He lifted my spirits as well. 22 Reply @deardaughter @deardaughter 2 months ago I love your teaching style. Reminds me very much of my own and that of my mentors. Exciting, forceful, clear, there’s something Eastern hemisphere about it too. Great lecture, thank you. Reply @mattgraves3709 @mattgraves3709 1 year ago This is one of the most incredible talks I've ever watched...and I am a software engineer...not even a low level engineer or in the domain of physics...I just find it interesting as hell. 5 Reply @albenataylor6573 @albenataylor6573 1 year ago What an absolute legend! Great lecturing style, thank you for uploading 6 Reply @stephenh.litman2684 @stephenh.litman2684 3 years ago This is the first lecture to really turn my head around on physics. There have been many more since, but this is the one that started it all for me. So, of course, I completely recommend it. Thank you to David Tong, and to those at the Royal Institution and Youtube who make lectures like this available. 105 The Royal Institution Reply 2 replies @TK0_23_ @TK0_23_ 9 months ago Still a top 5 lecture/video in my science education. A fundamental change in the way I see the world and unlocked other mysteries that I couldn't grasp. 2 Reply @anuragagarwalphi @anuragagarwalphi 10 months ago This guy's lecture notes are now a big part of why I want to study Theoretical Physics. 4 Reply @jefflyon2020 @jefflyon2020 1 year ago Amazing and spirited lecture on a difficult and daunting subject,and he s so right, as soon as the equations begin-the intimidation starts, whether your a student of physics or just curious and want to understand as much as possible.thanks. 4 Reply @Tom-zy6ke @Tom-zy6ke 8 months ago Seen a few of these RI lectures now, absolutely first class and my new firm favourite YouTube channel. We need another Einstein to pull together a set of seemingly unrelated currently known facts and show us that there is a relationship but as David Tong mentioned you have to look at the problem from a different angle which is what Einstein did as I understand it. I'm fascinated that there could be a Neuro-diverse kid out there right now that's perhaps been sidelined by conventional education that could give us that insight or at least move us a couple of steps closer to understanding what's going on. Exciting times. Reply @khaldounshehadeh9906 @khaldounshehadeh9906 6 months ago A must watch while alive. Excellent fine balance of overview and detail. Passionate and well paced delivery that makes the inspiring esoteric content accessible to wide spectrum of curious minds. 3 Reply 1 reply @ergbudster3333 @ergbudster3333 5 years ago This proves what I've always believed strongly since university: that a really smart person can explain things. A smart person who really understands things can explain things. And even the things that can't be explained can be made tantalizing and invite us to learn more. Wonderful lecture. Well, as so many are on the RI channel. 36 The Royal Institution Reply 1 reply @daveac @daveac 1 month ago Excellent - Has David Tong been back and given an updated lecture - or has little or no progress happened in the intervening 6 years? Thanks. Reply @lokeshdandwani158 @lokeshdandwani158 1 year ago Nobody could have partical physics better then Me. David. I was amazed with his knowledge and the way he expresses this. Salute to this man 1 Reply @Sunnyochek @Sunnyochek 3 months ago I'm so appreciate such possibility as watching this lecture. My thanks to The Royal Institution that give us free access to lectures and of cause thank lecturer for his brilliant talent of oration and his skill to explain pretty complicated things and conseptions such easy as possible Reply @RCBIGFLYER1 @RCBIGFLYER1 1 year ago What an Excellent Lecture, We still have a lot more to learn about Physics and the Standard Model. Thank You Sir! 1 Reply @phototommy @phototommy 1 year ago David Tong has an amazing ability to describe the deep complexity of reality in such a way as to make his understanding accessible to a wide audience. What hit me at the end of his talk is how much more he must know and understand about what lies beneath all the different concepts he nearly touched on. Oh to have the chance to experience that depth of knowledge first hand! 5 Reply 6 replies @owen7185 @owen7185 1 year ago Probably the best lecture I've ever seen on these topics and I want to see a whole lot more from this man. 74 Reply 1 reply @AlbertoApuCRC @AlbertoApuCRC 1 month ago Simplemente fenomenal, el dominio del escenario y el tema, la transferencia de las ideas. Una de las más completas charlas que he visto por aquí, y eso ya es decir mucho. Reply @SC-bg8wf @SC-bg8wf 1 year ago Very well explained. I came away understanding nearly all of what he said. Often with this sort of topic I understand up to a certain point and then my understanding falls off a cliff edge. 1 Reply @mamue2003 @mamue2003 1 year ago (edited) Such a brillant speech by Professor Long, thx so much for this! Presenting a "we don't know either" in such an enthusiastic, profound and clear cut manner is not what you might expect to be done by a theoretical physicist. Cheers from Germany! If you find some mistakes in my comment, then put the blame on autofill ;) 3 Reply 1 reply @bentonpix @bentonpix 8 months ago This is my go to video to show people who are hung up on "everything is made of little hard balls called atoms" belief that they were told from grade school. This truly shows how "something" can and does arise from "nothing". The profundity of what David Tong is sharing here is staggering. Reply @jerrybyers2172 @jerrybyers2172 1 year ago Thank you,sir! An entire semeseter in physics in one short lecture! 8 Reply @pixxelwizzard @pixxelwizzard 2 years ago Probably one of the best presentations I've ever seen on such a complicated subject. David Tong is an excellent presenter, enjoyed every minute of this discourse. 62 Reply @dylan_curious @dylan_curious 6 months ago Wow, this is fascinating! Michael Faraday was truly a genius for realizing that there is something real and physical between magnets that we can't see. It's amazing to think that something invisible like the magnetic field can have such a powerful force. Faraday's demonstration of induction with the moving magnetic field and the needle flickering on the other side of the table is just mind-blowing! It's incredible to think that we can communicate and affect things far away using the field without even touching it. And to top it all off, Faraday's speculation about the electric and magnetic fields being the only thing we've ever seen was confirmed years later by Maxwell and Hertz to be what we now call light. It's just a little bit magical, isn't it? Thank you for sharing this fascinating piece of scientific history with us! Reply @michaelnikitins5004 @michaelnikitins5004 1 year ago 3 minutes in and im hooked solely because of this guys energy. He is a great speaker. I wish i had a professor like him 14 Reply 2 replies @ikzoekuit7440 @ikzoekuit7440 4 weeks ago Thanks for this fantastic lecture! I wonder if there are any updates on the theory of everything? Possibly by findings (or lack thereof) by the LHC (I did not keep track) or JWST? Reply @morotoo @morotoo 1 year ago Great lecture! This time I understood 80 % of it 😁 1 Reply @alocin110 @alocin110 1 year ago What a wonderful presentation by Professor Dr. David Tong. Thank you for simpligying the the understand of the most complex things; The Quantum Vacuum Fluctuation. I liked it. Reply @balashish @balashish 2 years ago This is by far the most simple yet information packed lecture I have seen till date. ESPECIALLY, the similarities between EM and other fields - despite being interested in this for long, the simple analogy made me understand so much more. Thank you. And please keep up the good work! 29 Reply @muth7813 @muth7813 1 year ago Thank you, Professor Tong. Your humor enables engagement which is necessary to capture the attention of all listeners. As a lay person I was able to follow your presentation with just enough "extra weight" to exercise my brain. Question: Where do sound waves fit in to this equation? Electromagnetic waves pulsate at the same wavelength as soundwaves that we can hear. Have you considered sound for another tool in your box? 2 Reply @azizomar5774 @azizomar5774 1 year ago So a question about the vacuum in the box...if particles are nothing more then bunched up sections of the quantum fields then what actually is happening when Prof Tong says we take all the particles out of the box? Are we separating these bunched up portions of these fields and then transferring them outside the box (though the boundaries of the box are itself bunched up fields)? Or are the fields getting smoothened out so that when we say that we have taken out all the particles, we basically have reduced the quantum fields to their base state, so to say? 2 Reply @tourdeforce2881 @tourdeforce2881 3 months ago One of the most enjoyable lectures I have ever seen. Thank you The Royal Institution Reply @eugenefranik9557 @eugenefranik9557 1 year ago Fantastic lecture-Cosmology is my hobby and this lecture answered many questions that I had 2 Reply @laurentiubucur9586 @laurentiubucur9586 1 year ago Thank you for letting us to understand the subtle findings on reality according with latest theories 1 Reply @tomclark6854 @tomclark6854 6 years ago This is about as clear an explanation of the subject matter as one could hope for a non-scientist like myself. Thank you David Tong. 58 Reply 1 reply @jeanetjensen6474 @jeanetjensen6474 1 year ago (edited) Its absolutly wunderful, all the fields and forces dancing and making all we see and are. Love it 🌎❤️🙏 thank you so much for this lecture👏🇩🇰 2 Reply @adammell9499 @adammell9499 1 year ago Thought this was brilliant and have re-watched a couple of times now. Does anyone in the comments know any other videos on quantum field theory that are as good as this and maybe offer a little more on the subject? I've seen a few but they are often a bit vague or focus on the maths too much and not what the theory actually means (i'm in no way involved in STEM so the maths isn't much use to me - I'm happy to presume they got it right and then to know what the implications are). I've also heard no one else mentioned whether these are the fundamental building blocks of the universe and want to see what other's say on it 2 Reply @bingodeagle @bingodeagle 1 year ago I was lucky enough to attend this lecture all those years ago! I was still in school, and didn't really remember much about this, but now as an undergrad I've been studying from his notes on QFT and never realised it was the same guy! Shame I don't go to Cambridge, I would love to watch him give a proper lecture without all the dumbing down for laypeople 1 Reply 1 reply @tedj10 @tedj10 11 months ago what a great session. first time understood some part of quantum scale things. Hope i had such teacher in college/school. i would have better person in understanding science. 1 Reply @lazitazen6882 @lazitazen6882 11 months ago Absolutely LOVED this lecture!!!!! Thank you so much for posting Reply @tomneedham1937 @tomneedham1937 6 years ago I have a "working knowledge" of theoretical physics from my undergraduate years of long, long ago. This lecture is the VERY BEST lecture I have ever listened to explaining, in simplistic terms, what the current, cutting edge frontier pf physics is all about. Thank you Prof. Tong. Great job!! 395 Reply 33 replies @madhureddy7643 @madhureddy7643 1 year ago Amazing lecture, thank you Prof. Tong! 1 Reply @ryanmuhm7584 @ryanmuhm7584 1 year ago I tried to imagine nothing my whole childhood. It was maddening. It looked nothing like I was showed today lol. Now I have to reimagine everything again. Great talk. 2 Reply @radhikalo28. @radhikalo28. 1 year ago I as a layman with no physics background this lecture provided the entire picture, and made it easier for me to proceed further 1 Reply @snorkfire @snorkfire 1 year ago That’s the very bEST summary of the topics of modern physics that I’ve seen. Thanks for the tremendoust overview AND showing me the relevance of the relevant equation of everything. Nicely done. Reply @fredspencer4848 @fredspencer4848 8 months ago VERY well done! Thank you Dr. Tong! Reply @susanblackmith3747 @susanblackmith3747 3 years ago (edited) It is amazing how entertaining he has made this difficult subject. Thank you to The Royal Institution for sharing, and thank you David Tong just for being you. 45 The Royal Institution Reply @pingpong5000 @pingpong5000 1 year ago The truth IS out there and I love the fact that thanks to The Royal Institute we see chaps like this willing to share their passion to help us mortals walk toward some understanding our place in this universe. I wish TV presenters had this man's ability to present. Next time around i'm going to be smart. Reply @boris-lr6cs @boris-lr6cs 1 year ago Браво Дэвид! Очень доходчиво обьяснил неотвратимость финансирования абсурда материалистического познания и дороговизну технократического аспекта этого пути. Reply @jamesspry3294 @jamesspry3294 1 year ago This blows me sideways. I love it. I don't understand it. I feel humbled and yet very enlightened. Please do more of this! 1 Reply 1 reply @AsifKamalfars @AsifKamalfars 1 year ago i haven't studied physics after 12 grade but still, i clearly understood what he said phenomenal work 3 Reply @chrisrautmann8936 @chrisrautmann8936 1 year ago This should be the first class in an intro to Quantum Mechanics class. Or even a Physics 101 class. THIS is where we are. THIS is how we see the universe. And THIS is where the Big Questions still are. Now, let's dig in! 1 Reply @padger2577 @padger2577 3 years ago Just watching his motions and his eyes, this man is without a doubt the most dedicated theoretical physicist I've ever seen. He's obviously doing what it takes 7 Reply @mytubemickey @mytubemickey 1 year ago This is the best QM UT things I've ever seen on the web. As having evidenced by itself, it is an incredible talk along with showing up your enthusiasm, passion and perseverance in searching for QM completeness. Your talk is truly infectious to people like me with so many QM essential pieces and a more understandable way. What more astonishing to the global society is that most scientists have been giving up for decades to looking for a better QM explanation, but not you nor me. Reply 1 reply @amberscion1513 @amberscion1513 1 year ago Not only is he a fantastically entertaining speaker, but he wears a fabulous tie. Bring him back for more, so that we can all have more! 2 Reply @dragonhawk00 @dragonhawk00 12 days ago I think this may be the best basic explanation of quantum field theory I've ever heard. Reply @swamiloka3049 @swamiloka3049 10 months ago This man is precise. Many of my teachers came to the same conclusions. 6 Reply @Ravenmad2000 @Ravenmad2000 9 months ago David Tong has a wonderful way of teaching…Many Thanks. Reply @dr.mohamedaitnouh4501 @dr.mohamedaitnouh4501 1 year ago I am a geometric topologist and I have been listening to these terms for almost 20 years and this is the first time, thanks to Prof. Tong, at least, I understand the definition. If I met him before I would be a Mathematical physicist but it is never. too late! Please give him more talks. I subscribed!! 16 Reply 2 replies @michaelackerman8455 @michaelackerman8455 9 months ago What energy, what enthusiasm, what clarity! 1 Reply @stevenhamerlinck6832 @stevenhamerlinck6832 1 year ago He's extremely smart, very eloquent , relateable and funny in just the right way. A person I could listen to and learn from 6hrs / day (I need the rest to try and comprehend what he explained (and also because I'm defenitely not as smart...) 2 Reply @JK-Visions @JK-Visions 1 year ago This is soooo interesting. I am hooked after 4 minutes and after 10 the truth begins(as far as we know atm). Great lecture! 2 Reply @varthapadathavalibarsangha3674 @varthapadathavalibarsangha3674 7 months ago Best lecture clearing many of the doubts for me as a lay man in Quantum Physics. Reply 1 reply @Myria83 @Myria83 1 year ago (edited) Such a beautiful lecture! What about an update, after 5 years? 3 Reply @similarsherbert @similarsherbert 3 years ago This is the first time I understood physics or its reason for existing. It's also the first time I was this excited about science, and wishful that I'd got twenty more years being in this subject and learning it. Thank you so very very very very much, Mr David Tong. 23 Reply @AnwarHussainFaruqh @AnwarHussainFaruqh 9 months ago Great illustration and spread of science for development of humanity and universal understanding. Thank you the teams of the great Royal Institution, UK. I love the Science and its Scientific Almighty & His creations !!! Reply @johndoepker7126 @johndoepker7126 1 year ago Is that seriously for real the exact same "desk" ... why yes it is .... I think that's one of many reasons why I love these lectures...seeing all these men and women of science speaking about the world and the universe ....all whilst being humbled by their historical surroundings. Great minds, Great people!!! Learning a few things is pretty awesome too...🤟 3 Reply @n.g.h.calmarena7013 @n.g.h.calmarena7013 1 year ago How wonderful it is to hear a scientific talk about the reality, difficult to catch intellectually, but with a definitive feel of truth and reality. What a difference when you think of the nebulous quagmire of cosmology. The Royal Institution Reply 3 replies @marie-christinavirago3909 @marie-christinavirago3909 10 months ago Such remarkable verve and excitement for something that was almost destroyed for me by musty teachers. The swaying dance is magic indeed. THANK YOU! 21 Reply 3 replies @RetiredSignDude @RetiredSignDude 1 year ago Beautifully written. Beautifully delivered. 3 Reply @adurgh @adurgh 5 years ago I absolutely love the expository skills of professor Tong. I've recently discovered his physics lecture notes, and I'm blown away by how advanced, yet how elegantly and clearly put together they are. I hope I would have some time in the near future to translate this lecture into the Arabic language; regrettably I don't at the moment. 39 The Royal Institution Reply The Royal Institution · 4 replies @nzenguemayombogolden2660 @nzenguemayombogolden2660 1 year ago Great talk ☺️ I love it. Thank you very much. I wanted to be a theoretical physicist when I was a kid. Now I'm NOT a theoretical physicist (lol), but an engineer in Robotics and AI. I just love science and knowledge. 1 Reply 1 reply @greggapowell67 @greggapowell67 1 year ago A VERY theoretical physicist with a personable nature AND a brilliant sense of humor... One exists. Imagine that. 1 Reply @allwheeldrive @allwheeldrive 1 year ago The real progress is owning the real level of our ignorance. Understanding it all will more than likely never to happen, and we have yet to peel away the layers of reality (as it is) that inform existence. But what we glean along the way might come in pretty handy. Great talk (that I finally had a chance to see)! Thank you! Reply 1 reply @js3883 @js3883 2 months ago It has been awhile since this was posted talk was posted. It really answered a lot of my questions. I will post my question here. Are these fields becoming more settled as the universe expands? Reply @BigLicker76 @BigLicker76 11 months ago Great Video!! So interesting! But how do we go from this to tangible elements? 1 Reply @MathAdam @MathAdam 3 years ago 13:01 "It doesn't matter how old you are, or how many degrees in physics you have, there's something magical about this." Great science requires a childlike curiosity. 751 Reply 28 replies @zimnesuhvezdie9027 @zimnesuhvezdie9027 2 months ago Aká skvelá prednáška, ďakujem! Reply @Inner-wellbeing @Inner-wellbeing 1 year ago (edited) Great presentation. And —Those basic ideas in quantum physics and unifying/field theories have been explored and explained thousands of years ago in the East- ancient and modern eastern philosophy talks about the basic building blocks (called atoms in western science) and an invisible field that unifies everything and everyone. The theory is thousands of years old, as far as the history of our species knows. Reply 1 reply @sachitsharma1661 @sachitsharma1661 1 year ago We need this guy more! 2 Reply @lauramaria6043 @lauramaria6043 2 months ago I love this video. Very well explained. Reply @Turbohh @Turbohh 6 days ago Excellent and beautifully done. Thank you. Reply @brandonhargis4104 @brandonhargis4104 1 year ago This is actually the best and most comprehensible for the laymen, explanation of physics, that I have ever seen, in 3 decades of trying to explain this to students and myself. 19 Reply 1 reply @johns2105 @johns2105 1 year ago Brilliant lecture. I now understand everything. So far. Reply @akmmonirulislam3961 @akmmonirulislam3961 8 months ago Thank you sir. I loved your lecture. Reply @ChayDenne @ChayDenne 1 year ago its truly amazing that we all have access to information like this! Reply @zakzwijn8410 @zakzwijn8410 1 year ago (edited) Do y'all agree that with a medium like this, serving high quality, unique and interesting content for free, 'television' is suddenly looking terribly outdated and obsolete? A relic from the 20th century? 2 Reply @garyskinner2422 @garyskinner2422 2 years ago This is one of the best things I've ever seen it's incredible, his enthusiasm, his passion, his style is incredibly infectious so much more information in such a more understandable way. 55 The Royal Institution Reply @granthurlburt4062 @granthurlburt4062 1 year ago This is wonderful.I've been struggling through trying to understand Sabine H.'s lecture and a couple of her books. and Steve Weinberg, and just ddnt get fields. The analogy of liquds taht fill space is good enough for me, as is the field betw magnets. Thanks Reply @lukescott8352 @lukescott8352 3 weeks ago Wonderful explanation!! Thank you!! 🙏🙏🙏 Reply @henryb6009 @henryb6009 1 year ago (edited) This idea of field reminds me of a hindou concept: the akasha. In this regard, this idea of an all pervasive field throughout space, time and matter dates back to a couple of thousand years. Together with prana (energy/conciousness), akasha makes all physical (and mind) phenomena emerge and disolve. Great talk. 2 Reply @wmpmacm @wmpmacm 1 year ago Great talk. Very explanatory. I don't pretend to know any of the particulars, but the general picture is believable. 1 Reply 1 reply @gurugeorge @gurugeorge 1 year ago He makes sense out of the confusing jumble of ideas I've heard about physics from journalism and popular books over the last few decades. Reply 1 reply @benjamino76 @benjamino76 4 years ago The best explanation of quantum mechanics and the most intriguing glimpse of the future of physics I have seen. Accessible, funny and fascinating. What a great communicator he is. 30 Reply @kkrenken895 @kkrenken895 1 year ago This may be my all-time favorite lecture 1 Reply @TravisJamesMusic @TravisJamesMusic 1 year ago What a great lecture! Reply @mikebrant192 @mikebrant192 1 year ago More of this lecturer, please. I would like to be smarter! Reply @dr.jenskuhnemann3411 @dr.jenskuhnemann3411 9 months ago Thanks a lot for that outstanding lecture. Reply @schlippery1 @schlippery1 1 year ago mind boggling to say the least, thank you for sharing this :) Reply @ZeedijkMike @ZeedijkMike 6 years ago An hour very well spent. Great lecture. 157 Reply 4 replies @anjalir1026 @anjalir1026 1 year ago Professor David Tong, You're making me fall in love with Physics again. :) 2 Reply @a.paulschumann8895 @a.paulschumann8895 1 year ago David Tong brought me closer to understanding the 4 forces (I still don't know the difference between Strong & weak) and the different particle classes. I am not a physicist. Reply @hornwijaya5033 @hornwijaya5033 3 weeks ago I am truly grateful for this knowledge, and last night it changed my perception of reality. This morning, during hot shower, when the neurons sparking, it struck me. Since everything is about Fields, interconnectedness of everything, and Mass related to fields as well; everything what we call Mumbo Jumbo makes sense now.... Witchcraft, poltergeist, Telekinesis, Feelings of Being Watched, Goosebumps, "Entities", Life Force, Star Wars, Wizardry, Force Field, as long as one has a certain capacity to control or manipulate the fields with or without even realising it. Reply @savage22bolt32 @savage22bolt32 1 year ago (edited) 18:22 that answered a question I've had for years! Besides that, this is probably the most interesting lesson I've ever seen on ytube! 3 Reply @krzyszofmotkowski3063 @krzyszofmotkowski3063 9 months ago A great scientist and great teacher in one Reply @hikmatullahpakhtoon3694 @hikmatullahpakhtoon3694 1 year ago Currently i am 7th semester undergraduate student, so far i had just heard of these theories names but after watching this lecture i got a bit of knowledge about them. Thanks to professor Tong and RI. 11 Reply @Theartmaker101 @Theartmaker101 10 months ago Hey guys! This is the best explanation of what we live in... the 12 fields... so far established... I have ever seen. He missed the largest field. Love. It makes us human. 5 Reply 3 replies @Lea-gx8ht @Lea-gx8ht 4 months ago His real and true passion for knowledge made him what he is today. Reply @wolfgangbauer1283 @wolfgangbauer1283 9 months ago Yes, amazing guy, gives a glimpse of reality in front of same table where Farady and others changed the worlds perspective before👌 Reply @adelmenani9743 @adelmenani9743 1 year ago This lecture is amazing espetially the last quarter of it. It opened mind to new facinating thaughts. Thank you Reply @user-kt5bn5xe1e @user-kt5bn5xe1e 1 month ago I like his lecture and explanation and it’s brilliant. Wish I knew what is all these about. It is boggling? ❤You Reply @DavidSiegelVision @DavidSiegelVision 3 years ago Well presented! Few theory people are good at communicating to a lay audience. I was hoping to hear about multidimensions, multiverse, and anti-matter, but this covered a lot of ground in a short period of time. Thank you. 8 Reply @johnmacmillan627 @johnmacmillan627 12 days ago Wonderfully informative. Thank you👏👏 Reply @ambition112 @ambition112 2 weeks ago 0:14: 🔬 The video discusses the question of what are the fundamental building blocks of nature and provides an overview of our current understanding and future progress in this field. 5:17: ! JJ Thomson's discovery of atoms and Rutherford's model of the atom. 11:23: 🔬 The idea of electric and magnetic fields, which originated from Michael Faraday's experiments, has been around for almost 200 years. 16:37: 🌌 Michael Faraday's genius led to the understanding that light is made of ripples in the electric and magnetic field, which we now call fields. 22:41: 🔬 The field governed by quantum mechanics constantly fluctuates, even when there is nothing else present. 28:10: 🔬 The video discusses the agreement between experimental measurements and theoretical calculations in quantum field theory. 33:43: 🔍 The video discusses the mysteries surrounding the existence and properties of particles such as muons, tau particles, neutrinos, and quarks. 39:10: 🔬 Understanding the Higgs field is crucial for understanding mass in the universe and confirming the correctness of the standard model. 44:25: 🌌 The video discusses the field causing repulsion in the universe, the concept of inflation, and the age of the universe. 50:23: 🔍 Theoretical physicists are looking for patterns in equations to uncover deeper structures. 55:40: 🤔 The speaker expresses both hope and skepticism about the LHC discovering something in the next few years. Recap by Tammy AI 3 Reply @bibeksapkota4620 @bibeksapkota4620 1 year ago The best of the talks I have ever listened to. Even a very naive enthusiast of physics like me can understand 100% of the deepest aspect of existence! Reply 3 replies @rachelwren-vipond6029 @rachelwren-vipond6029 1 year ago fabulous lecture, saved it to watch again and probably again and again....... 1 Reply @chinesejohn812 @chinesejohn812 1 year ago This is a great lecture!!! Reply @carloscosta3514 @carloscosta3514 1 year ago (edited) Many thanks to RI and especially Professor David Tong for this excellent lecture. Lots of information about "everything" explained accurately and intelligently. Bright. 9 Reply @rod4095 @rod4095 1 year ago Beautifully presented. Reply @shobhnadevi9467 @shobhnadevi9467 1 year ago This is how science should be taught. He knows how to hold your attention. 2 Reply 1 reply @RobOlling @RobOlling 3 weeks ago (edited) There are also cosmic rays, that go up in energy almost infinitely. The CR with the highest energy ever recorded, a single proton, had a much energy as a brick falling in your toe. Reply @user-cl8zj8hn2d @user-cl8zj8hn2d 1 month ago A great lecturer. Reply @kongchan437 @kongchan437 5 months ago Now 6 years later...has anybody in the world started working on that very challenging research field yet ? Reply @Iumiforgot @Iumiforgot 4 years ago This has got to be the MOST concise explanation I have ever heard of such a convoluted subject 454 Reply 7 replies @Juan_Alvaro @Juan_Alvaro 1 year ago Brilliant! Makes it look easy (so to speak...). Soo cool! Bravo. Reply @coreyaudet7582 @coreyaudet7582 1 year ago Intelligence and passion, great combination for achieving success in answering life's questions. Reply @Roedygr @Roedygr 1 year ago very informative, surprising and entertaining. Reply @sreedharanm7308 @sreedharanm7308 1 year ago This illuminating lecture talks about the latest developments in theoretical physics. Starting with Standard Model and then going through Grand Unification Theory and Higg's Boson, and finally reaching at String Theory. Physicists conception of reality at present is erected upon the concept of field. However, if you ask any physicist what is this field, don't expect a clear cut answer! As said in this video field is something that has a particular value at each point in space and it pervades the whole of space. You can know it's presence by experiencing a force but not what it actually is! It is transcendental, beyond our direct experience. It's real nature is unknown and probably unknowable. You thing you can know everything but when you go to the ultimate limit you recognise that you know nothing! Reply @davidmckayii752 @davidmckayii752 1 month ago Very succinct speech. Great lesson. Reply @Xingqiwu387 @Xingqiwu387 4 years ago (edited) Brilliant! What a charismatic physicist with utterly phenomenal teaching and presentation skills. 106 Reply 1 reply @randyrowland6744 @randyrowland6744 9 months ago Curious: exactly how many elements are now known to still be missing in the table as it exists now? I wonder if it's a total number of 144? Seems that number should be in this equation somewhere. Reply @berndwischnewski7980 @berndwischnewski7980 1 month ago Die Diskussionen hier sind so interessant, dass ich mich mal genauer mit dem Thema beschäftigt habe. Dabei hat sich sehr eindeutig ergeben, dass im Video perfekt die Fehler der Lorentz-Formel erkannt wurden und dass diese auch sehr gut mit Beispielen verständlich gemacht wurden. Mich wundert, dass da überhaupt jemand, der etwas von Physik versteht, dies nicht wahr haben will und versucht etwas anzugeben, was dagegen spricht. Eigentlich gibt es da gar nichts zu diskutieren. Das einzige, was mir nicht klar geworden ist, ist die Erklärung des Fadenstrahlrohrs, weil es hier ja gar keine zwei unterschiedliche Magnetfelder gibt, die addiert werden müssen. Die Magnetfeldlinien von beiden Spulen sollten hier tatsächlich im Innenraum der Spulen von einer Spule zur anderen gehen, was tatsächlich quer zur Elektronenbewegung ist und damit im Widerspruch zu einer Bewegung entlang von Magnetfeldlinien ist. In einem YouTube - Video wurde diese Magnetfeldrichtung sogar mit einem Kompass bestätigt. Reply @politicalwrong3289 @politicalwrong3289 1 year ago He is so enjoying his job. So happy to see that. 3 Reply @davidfelli5149 @davidfelli5149 1 year ago what a great speaker! such a joy to listen <3 Reply @anisht_dev @anisht_dev 10 days ago LOVE D THIS VIDEO. DAVID'S ENTHUSIASM WAS ALSO A GREAT THING IN THIS LECTURE. THANK YOU!!❤❤ Reply @mikeschatz9153 @mikeschatz9153 6 years ago I have a new favorite theoretical physicist!!!!!!! Thanks David Tong you are so fun to listen to and your enthusiasm is contagious. Please make a few more videos. 186 Reply 2 replies @kopickiphotography6702 @kopickiphotography6702 3 weeks ago David speaks in 3 dimensions. Perfect. Simply perfect for this topic. Reply @jenv9782 @jenv9782 1 year ago (edited) Mesmerizing! I was hooked right at the start and couldn't stop watching. Thank you! Reply @marthareal8398 @marthareal8398 1 year ago Thank you for this lecture, I value it. Your delivery is effective for me and I know that I can be a bit slow or your people speak too fast. Reply @taffbanjo @taffbanjo 1 year ago Magnificent lecture! Reply @syntaxed2 @syntaxed2 1 year ago Amazing lecture! 1 Reply @danabee3775 @danabee3775 5 years ago (edited) TOP CLASS LECTURE on difficult concepts! I fell in love with this channel! David Tong not only is a professional at his field (as in - true scientist), he is also an amazing presenter while keeping the whole lecture in a dynamic pace while joking here and there. WOW! I was worried I would be falling asleep or would be clicking "play pause play pause" in order to grasp the explanaitions ... no need! Please, please, keep bringing more of these with David Tong! 42 Reply 2 replies @Gary-rf7ng @Gary-rf7ng 3 weeks ago I understand that a GUT unifies the 4 forced of nature but what about the other particles and their associated fields? Could there be a single field that explains those too or can someone explain why Fermions are different than Bosons when it comes to expecting a single unified field/force? Why not one field filling all of space that is responsible for all the particles like particles have different traits. Couldn't particles just be different traits or expressions/vibrations of the same field? Reply @kukhokuhletsengwa5730 @kukhokuhletsengwa5730 1 year ago When he introduced that equation of the standard model, my life changed for good. Reply @user-qw6fv6rw8x @user-qw6fv6rw8x 3 months ago I think of humans as electrical/magnetic generators we contribute to these fields or waves we can also feel these waves. Is not reality fluid in itself? These quantum fields can be influenced by the intention of thoughts or focusing on the outcomes. Only trying to visualize these become easier when explained as David has done. Thank you for helping the information become real. Reply 1 reply @Boss-qv8oy @Boss-qv8oy 1 year ago possible that at least squaring the power is the minimum required to see the next level / cross dimensions - thus mind-warpingly difficult - awesome lecture Reply @philomat77 @philomat77 4 years ago Great lecture! The content is profound, yet the delivery is my best experience yet of clear explanations. Much appreciated! 8 Reply @oeaoo @oeaoo 1 year ago Honesty in science is everything. 1 Reply @axkuebiko0019 @axkuebiko0019 1 year ago thanks for making me more more more into physics Reply @theekshanabandara9293 @theekshanabandara9293 10 months ago A very insightful and an intriguing speech! 5 Reply @dianabenobo @dianabenobo 10 months ago The field of entanglement seems to mysteriously add mass to the space within and around physical collections. Reply @georgeschiraga5725 @georgeschiraga5725 1 year ago This was one of the best instructive videos I have seen..It tells me how much I do not know. 1 Reply @Haridas991 @Haridas991 3 years ago Thank you for this excellent presentation. You are a brilliant physicist as well as an amazing teacher. You make something so complex, easy for everyone to understand. Great to see a man of science with such a sense of humour. 5 Reply @GrahamCrannell @GrahamCrannell 1 year ago 14:00 - you can tell he's excited beyond reason when he's talking about Faraday in the Theatre at the RI. And i don't blame him haha; if I was giving a lecture in the same place where EM was first laid out, I would be absolutely beside myself 😂😂 Reply @josehugoelsas8699 @josehugoelsas8699 1 year ago (edited) "This equation correctly predicts the result of every single experiment we've ever done in science", not anymore in 2022 (updated W mass from Tevatron). Not to complain too much, awesome lecture! 1 Reply 3 replies @joannamariaochoa6830 @joannamariaochoa6830 9 months ago You're nice lecturer David, thank you!. Reply @user-ky3ed4no8x @user-ky3ed4no8x 1 year ago Amazing lecture!!! Reply @NoNTr1v1aL @NoNTr1v1aL 10 months ago Absolutely amazing video! 1 Reply @jaispartacus @jaispartacus 2 years ago I was lucky enough to see Professor David Tong give a lecture on gravity at Isaac Newton's house during the Gravity Fields Festival a few years ago. He is an excellent science communicator. The way he explains things makes really complicated science easy(ish) to understand, even for a dim-wit like me. He should be given a TV show, but until then, I'm off to watch more of his stuff on YouTube... 7 Reply 1 reply @dabrupro @dabrupro 1 year ago That was fascinating. Thank you. Reply @andrejbecker8955 @andrejbecker8955 10 months ago Great lecture! Reply @AnadiMishraone @AnadiMishraone 1 year ago Sir, I have a question and request a video on this and maybe scientist community should concentrate on this too Which is : If a simple star does mass coronal discharge every second and releases million tons of plasma outside in universe, then a) Where does it negate or propagate, b) With reducing mass, according to Newton's law of gravitation, the force of attraction should reduce every second even if by fraction, but in long time run it should result in something. Please make a video on this. Reply @aquilinusodong3222 @aquilinusodong3222 10 months ago I love this and know, something will be found to provide the way forward. Love it! 1 Reply @ylbergashi8425 @ylbergashi8425 1 year ago Amazing teacher! Reply @dnomyarnostaw @dnomyarnostaw 6 years ago Probably the best and most illuminating lecture I have ever "attended". A fantastic explanation presented in a lucid and interesting way 44 Reply 2 replies @benjievlogs7877 @benjievlogs7877 2 months ago He could have delivered his last speech by saying "But I hope someday, you can give us something better". This is to awaken the mind of the audience and yoing scientist to contribute something in physics😅like a motivational speech. As what michiu kaku always says to his interview, he always challenge his audiences and any people who has interest in physics to help them solve the equation, and he said he should be contacted first if somebody found the solution so that they can split the prize half and half which is a kind of a challenge to any aspiring scientist ❤. Reply 1 reply @rohitchat5538 @rohitchat5538 1 year ago Word by word I understand wonderful spectacular learning you are respected 🙏🙏 I regard you 1 Reply @Bianchi77 @Bianchi77 1 year ago Nice info, thank you for sharing it :) Reply @user-nx3kt5wi3z @user-nx3kt5wi3z 3 weeks ago Ahhhhh, what a great teacher! Men like Professor Tong can lift up an age! And to have Royal Institution lectures by such brilliant individuals available free online is really the height of civilization. Reply @truthhurtz333 @truthhurtz333 1 year ago this man is absolutely brilliant😁👍 Reply @GulzarAhmad-sw1kh @GulzarAhmad-sw1kh 7 months ago Excellent Lecture!!! Reply @MoRiley9 @MoRiley9 4 years ago Simply the best video of its kind and connects all the dots...finally! Tong is a great speaker and his ability to explain in simple terms and analogies is spot on. I can watch this again and again, 40 The Royal Institution Reply 3 replies @paolopaolo731 @paolopaolo731 1 year ago Amazing you are really giving energy to the lecture (I love the desk ) Reply @goutamghosh1118 @goutamghosh1118 13 days ago Very good intro to Quantum Field theory. But, should have mentioned how does the name "Boson" came into being??!! No lecture on this subject is complete without mentioning the name and contribution of Prof. Satyen Bose, the great Indian (Kolkata) physicist and mathematician. The whole "Finding the God's particle" exercise at Cern was motivated, basically, by his ideas. Reply @uurkubaalle3205 @uurkubaalle3205 9 months ago Probably the given name to the force I was looking for!! Hey myself, I will find out if it is the same thing when I complete the content. Love it! Reply @hyrumtanner5584 @hyrumtanner5584 1 year ago I thought it was quite the clever joke to say that the quantum field that existed in the first fractions of a second of time in the universe is a "new" field, when clearly it is actually the oldest of all fields. Reply @clinkclonkclunk1874 @clinkclonkclunk1874 1 year ago Best explanation I have seen about the subject. Reply @vaporizer08 @vaporizer08 5 years ago Mesmerizing. Especially the quantum fields within the very first nanoseconds of the big bang stretching afterwards to create flickering of the universe. This is huge discovery, finally having the potential in physics to relate sub atomic world with the larger reality of the universe. Wow...Thanks to David Tong to explain it so simply. 15 Reply 1 reply @dilipdas5777 @dilipdas5777 1 year ago (edited) This lecture is so great that I can't explain in language 9 Reply 3 replies @moviesandsmoothies3600 @moviesandsmoothies3600 1 year ago This is an amazing lecture I can’t look away 1 Reply @arbentashko7005 @arbentashko7005 1 month ago 1. A photon moving with the speed of light is described by the "energy it possessed". If a photon has a structure and may be rotated around an axis we can imagine it as a "Physical Point" or "as a seed/embryo" responsible for creating "elementary particles". In this case a "rotated photon" will be described by the "mass it possessed" . 2. When we "assumed" that from e "box" are "extracted all particles", rotated photons that will be inside the box, may be called "Fundamental building blocks of matter" Reply @bensimmons5439 @bensimmons5439 3 weeks ago Learned there are precisely 16 fields. 12 matter fields and 4 force fields. Cool. Reply @AvaWilliamsCup @AvaWilliamsCup 3 weeks ago 0:14: 🔬 The video discusses the question of what are the fundamental building blocks of nature and provides an overview of our current understanding and future progress in this field. 5:17: ! JJ Thomson's discovery of atoms and Rutherford's model of the atom. 11:23: 🔬 The idea of electric and magnetic fields, which originated from Michael Faraday's experiments, has been around for almost 200 years. 16:37: 🌌 Michael Faraday's genius led to the understanding that light is made of ripples in the electric and magnetic field, which we now call fields. 22:41: 🔬 The field governed by quantum mechanics constantly fluctuates, even when there is nothing else present. 28:10: 🔬 The video discusses the agreement between experimental measurements and theoretical calculations in quantum field theory. 33:43: 🔍 The video discusses the mysteries surrounding the existence and properties of particles such as muons, tau particles, neutrinos, and quarks. 39:10: 🔬 Understanding the Higgs field is crucial for understanding mass in the universe and confirming the correctness of the standard model. 44:25: 🌌 The video discusses the field causing repulsion in the universe, the concept of inflation, and the age of the universe. 50:23: 🔍 Theoretical physicists are looking for patterns in equations to uncover deeper structures. 55:40: 🤔 The speaker expresses both hope and skepticism about the LHC discovering something in the next few years. Recap by Tammy AI Reply @DS-fk7ed @DS-fk7ed 2 years ago Most of this is way beyond my understanding but David's enthusiasm and humor made this a very enjoyable watch. Excellent lecture. 7 Reply @katakalyptica @katakalyptica 1 year ago My compliments. Due to their engraved statement, every word and every term can be precisely understood. A pleasure to listen. The perfect didac-tics and presentation and the choice of location are superfluous to men-tion for tautological self-conviction reasons An original german speaking listener, Dr. Schwund. Thank you very much. Mein Kompliment. Aufgrund ihrer gestochenen Aussage lässt sich jedes Wort und jeder Term präzise verstehen. Ein Vergnügen, zuzuhören. Die perfekte Didaktik und Präsentation und die Wahl der Location erübrig sich ja zu erwähnen aus tautologischen Selbstüberzeugungsgründen. Ein original deutsch sprechender Zuhörer, Dr. Schwund. Thank you very much Reply @Pi-Photo @Pi-Photo 1 year ago (edited) A quick noob question. Are there different "flavours" of up and down quarks, depending of what element they are present in, or are they all the same? 2 Reply 1 reply @richgalle753 @richgalle753 1 year ago Dr. Who has my vote. Great explanation. 1 Reply @asad-kc8zf @asad-kc8zf 2 weeks ago Very enthusiastic. Love it. But watching in late 2023, whole lot of it is already outdated. Especially after James Webb telescope 🔭 went operational. Big bang theory is finished! But appreciate the enthusiasm and curiosity. It’s interesting that we and our tools are made of these particles and waves and trying to understand our own nature and properties.Good luck. Reply @adrianlangat6019 @adrianlangat6019 11 months ago I have a QUESTION you've said the up quark, down quark, electron, and photon fundamentally exist as fields which are the up quark field, down quark field, electron field, and photon field which is the electromagnetic field. And these fields get tied up into quanta bundles of energy to form their respective particles. You've said in a vacuum, if you remove these particles, the fields still exist which are the quantum vacuum fluctuation fields. So if you remove the particles, you've removed their respective fields too? And you've said in a vacuum where all the particles have been taken out, there are still fields, the quantum vacuum fluctuation fields. Can these quantum vacuum fluctuation fields also be tied up into quanta bundles of energy to form a quantum vacuum fluctuation particle? Reply @w0mblemania @w0mblemania 5 years ago (edited) There is something magnificent, magical, haunting about seeing someone deliver a lecture at the same desk as Faraday. Between Faraday and now, there have been tens of millions of deaths in war, the Holocaust, untold suffering. But there is also an unbroken chain of scientific discovery. 373 The Royal Institution Reply 28 replies @amityadav101 @amityadav101 1 year ago Wow this was explained in the vedas thousands of years ago .. finally science is catching up 👍🏾 1 Reply 3 replies @misha-jz4yx @misha-jz4yx 5 months ago This is the lecture I share with my friends so we can chat about it on long walks in the forest Reply @SolidSiren @SolidSiren 1 year ago I realize he's trying to be funny...but the periodic table IS NOT "a mess". At all. In fact,it makes alot of sense and is quite organized. It helps us remember how different elements act. Reply @OkazNaPokaz @OkazNaPokaz 1 year ago We are part of the system of fields and I wonder if there is chance to fully understand the system by us if we are part of it being stucked inside. Analogy: does let’s say procesor in the computer can understand the manner in which computer works as a whole. Reply @sourcelee3539 @sourcelee3539 1 year ago Wow, i found i really love what you are talking about. keep digging, so we can learn more~ Thanks! Reply @DingbatToast @DingbatToast 4 years ago This guy is brilliant! An engaging and charismatic presenter who doesn't need things that go bang to completely envelop and interest you in his world. Thank you for this gem of a lecture 4 Reply @MichaelMonterey @MichaelMonterey 1 year ago OK David, here's a holonomic, macro-ontological explanation: The CGI 'visualization' is not like the reality of the magneto-dielectric (MDE) 'sky-ocean' of being (the cosmos) 'inside' & 'outside' of everything, but it helps inch us closer to a new view of the current event (the cosmos, as is). It is the ever-changing condition of all 'physical' and proto-physical phenomena, at all scales of form. It happens as it does because of all the interactions of 'subfields' and of subfields with 'the field' (the magneto-dielectric sky-ocean of E + m, 'free' energy + 'matter'). > Now, it helps to bear in mind that the apparently fluidic phenomena we see/detect as 'dark' energy/matter interacting with galaxies, etc., looks that way because it is fluidic, proto-fluidic & hyper-fluidic. So, every kind of energetic event in the cosmos, at all scales, impacts and affects the vibratory motions & flow events of all subfields. That is because all subfields are inseparably interdependent, interactive, and their radiant emanations interpenetrate each other. So, apparently, the elemental & sub-elemental subfields do what they do (and are as they are) because of 8 luminal gradients of energy density, radiation pressure, and resonant oscillatory activity caused & sustained by the energetic activity of everything & every mode of energy, at all scales. > So, for a better QM view & better theory, we need quantum hydrodynamics (QHD) and hyper-fluid mechanics (HFM) + fluid mechanics + macro-ontology (not pseudo-cosmology). Of course, we don't need particles, because elemental & sub-elemental forms are fluid-dynamic events caused by all the interacting subfields of the MDE sky-ocean of E (the cosmos). This view enables understanding the detectable/observable reality of the field of being (the cosmos/reality) as it is, without blowing up any of it. > For example, we can think of the relationship of hyper-physical, hyper-luminal (not dark), hyper-frequency hyper-plasma as having 2 main regimes of hyper-density (of E). So, let's say that +/--66% (of the +/--96% of being) is electronic hyper-plasma, and +/--33% is protionic hyper-plasma. The other +/--1% is probably trans-physical or trans-luminal hydrogenic plasma precipitating into the slower & lower energy density regime of luminal & sub-luminal E. Now, it helps to bear in mind that the "Planck energy" density at the Z-point interface between the hyper-luminal & luminal gradients/regimes = +/--10^113 greater than m, also that the EM forces of the luminal & sub-luminal subfields are 10^39 greater than G ('g force'). > So, for the sake of truly progressive R&D, let's assume that the combined 'free' energy density, D(E), of the whole MDE sky-ocean = 10^152 x G, and that most of it is doing what it does in its hyper-luminal regimes 'inside' and 'outside' of all forms of elemental energy phenomena, etc. That's more than enough E to cause/enable & sustain all subfield phenomena detectable/observable at all scales of being. What enabled & sustains it all then becomes more easily understandable. > For example, instead of an impossible expansion/explosion of nothingness accidentally causing everything, but mostly (+/--96%) nothing, we can think of energy arising/emerging/precipitating (take your pick) as a result of the enabling principles & properties of activity, a subsidiary principles of functionality, relativity, form, structure, physicality, etc. We can then intuit the initiation of spin, rotating subfields, more energy, interactions, more forms, etc., and so on. After all, spin, counter-rotating subfields, and dual-vortices of E are the most primitive generative forms & modes of organization (& E). > Hence, instead of an absurdly repulsive accelerating expansion of nothingness (empty, nonphysical, vacuum/space), we can see the ubiquitous microwave 'background' of the MDE sky-ocean and some of the relative blue+red-shift as results of accelerating spin (of the cosmic field of being). Yes, instead of an impossible explosion & repulsive expansion of a bunch of nothing (& an infinitesimal smattering of stuff) plus eternally entropic E-loss, the universe can generate more E as its rate of spin increases. > Naturally, it helps to remember that, so far, what physicists & astronomers have studied and mostly misunderstood is a very tiny fraction of +/--4% of less than +/--4% of the totality of universal being. Of course, we can admit that it's mostly misunderstood because ever more, unexpected, surprising, mysterious phenomena are discovered (almost daily) that keep invalidating the predictions, fundamental assumptions, hypotheses, theorems, and beliefs of SM QM & its pseudo-cosmology. That was possible because the current SM QM status quo ignores most of the realities and all of the nonphysical causal/enabling & sustaining principles that empower all energetic phenomena (the totality of universal being). QED. Reply @ianreid2226 @ianreid2226 1 year ago Brilliant, just brilliant! What more could be said? 1 Reply @pkstangtang1476 @pkstangtang1476 1 year ago DAVID TONG ...BEST TEACHER ON QUANTUM FIELDS (PREVIOUSLY QUANTUM MECHANICS). 2020. PLEASE CAN WE HEAR HIM AGAIN WITH ANY NEW IDEAS. 2/2022 Reply @derkyarik_7298 @derkyarik_7298 7 months ago About the Burkhard Heim theory, on this presentation on 25-11-1976, I only know 2 things: 1º Burkhard set all forces (strong, weak, electromagnetic, gravitation) , not trough the exchange of particles, but trough deformation of its own space, like gravity is done in Einstein theory with deformation of Space-Time space. This is why, for more forces, are needed more dimensions (I remember 6 on original theory of 1976). 2º It is a geometrical theory. And its prediction is what really impress to me. Not only mass (about 20 elementary particles, with precision of about 4 to 8 digits), but also average life of each particle. I do not understand full him, but for what I have read from him, particles are a kind of dynamical structures jumping between the 6 dimensions. Also, on its prediction, is a thing, at least for me, incredible. On its 1976 presentation, it show how gravitational force is changed, according to his theory. It is on his 1976 presentation (Basic thoughts on a unified field theory of matter and gravity). The function, the gravitation force, is displayed with distance, and for low distance, is like Newton Law (1/r^2), positive (attraction). But since a cosmic distance, it reaches zero, and after, saturate on a constant repulsive force, independent of distance ,,,,,,, . ¿Do you remember red-shift, speed proportional to distance ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?. Exactly from this can be. And worst, at a big cosmic distance (Over Galaxy clouds size),,,,,,,,, it start a exponential-way repulsive force,,,,,, ¿Must I remember you the Dark-Energy?, at big distance, we saw now, since 2000, a big, big, repulsion,,,,,,,,,,, This work was presented on 1976, on the old MMB of Germany,,,,,,,,,, Well, as I have told you, I do not understand almost nothing from him, so, I have just start testing his presentation on 1976, his formulae, and just the beginning (Electron charge, who did him before 1960), test it, both quantitative, and qualitative (Dimensional analyse). And yes, it is, both, true. Best Regards. Reply @maverickdoe6984 @maverickdoe6984 1 year ago It's pretty mind-bending. Knowing that all particles in the universe are somehow created by quantum fields doesn't even come close to explaining what is guiding these fields into creating these particles. We know DNA is responsible for replicating cells. And yet we have no idea what guides a quantum field into creating this DNA particle. And these DNA particles are "copies" in one species, but quite different in another. What force guides these quantum fields to create such particles? And how can we be so certain that, just because the quantum field exists, and it's behavior is affected by the particles in it, that it is, itself, responsible for these particles existing? 2 Reply 9 replies @rekhav4757 @rekhav4757 2 years ago So lucidly explained , that lay people like us could understand every word of it . Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with the world 🙏🙏🙏 42 Reply 1 reply @someoneontheinternet3090 @someoneontheinternet3090 1 year ago If scientists stopped being so imaginative with naming things then science literacy would likely shoot through the roof. I have remembered the names of quarks since the first time that I've heard of them because they are named normal English things. Reply @Iseedimley @Iseedimley 3 weeks ago (edited) About to agree. In the past, my assumption had several condensation points for subatomic particles. But now, why were there several? Instead of one central Big Bang. Everything we see, points to an expanding universe. Yeah right "the proton consists of", but what explains the known field effects. Go ahead, I'm trying. Reply @investlikeagirl4234 @investlikeagirl4234 1 year ago I love his enthusiasm and that his voice isn’t monotonous. 3 Reply @qf1150 @qf1150 1 year ago Do the fluctuations of fields in the vacuum affect spacetime? Reply @mahaksharma193 @mahaksharma193 9 months ago Best lecture on "Quantum Field". Reply @IngVasiu @IngVasiu 3 years ago (edited) Personally, I'm going to consider this video as the best lecture I've ever seen. 77 The Royal Institution Reply @brianwong @brianwong 11 months ago Fascinating that I found more answers to what "reality" really is after watching the latest Advaita Vedanta talk by Swami Sarvarpriyananda than this impressive lecture. Reply @miniminamanmina3715 @miniminamanmina3715 9 months ago Soon as you give anything , a field , a force, or any kind of physics a definition , a new foundation has to be projected to hold it's position in the creation. Fun!!! Reply 1 reply @garythompsonfineart @garythompsonfineart 1 year ago I may have missed this, but did the quantum fields exist before the big bang? Reply @profecarlao @profecarlao 1 year ago Amazing! Thx Professor Tong! Reply @Crypto_Briefs_ @Crypto_Briefs_ 1 year ago (edited) We are not seeing new particles from LHC because we only are detecting quantum wave fluctuations. We disturb the wave fields by colliding energetic particles. It's like seeing a crocodile jump out of the water whenever it sees a bird but we don't know what's under water once the crocodile goes underwater. That's what we detect with LHC. Similar analogy would be seeing everything around a blackhole but not inside it. We need to fine tune our detectors to much lower energy than operating at GeV levels. We can do that when maybe by not using water for bubble chambers but Bose Einstein condensate as detector fluid. Only then maybe we can measure quantum fields "near" their lowest energy states. We probably will never hit a 0 energy quantum field observation since measurement requires to disturb the fields at the fundamental level. Maybe when we will have near zero kelvin electronics, we will start seeing deeper under the shroud. As humans we are still operating at very high temperatures in particle wave physics. We only see high energy wave fluctuations of the standard model which is true but it's deeper. Reply @anarosacastaneda1051 @anarosacastaneda1051 2 years ago Absolutely brilliant. I have really enjoyed this sophisticated lesson on quantum mechanics, which definitely may result on being highly valued and appreciated from an ordinary people's perspective. Thanks for explaining this so well. 6 Reply @SpotterVideo @SpotterVideo 1 year ago Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons. Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. 1 Reply @R2BCH2 @R2BCH2 1 year ago I like the animation of the quantum field. This is the absolute minimum of existence. There can be no less than the perpetual motion of "quantum foam" of spacetime which is certainly something. Nothingness cannot exist. The Universe exists because it's impossible to not exist. In one form or another. There is no creation, only transformations of something existing into something else existing. No "creator" needed. 2 Reply @bradbird100 @bradbird100 1 month ago This man is an amazing lecturer Reply @eahannan @eahannan 2 months ago Excellent presentation. Reply @ulrichgorlich6292 @ulrichgorlich6292 1 year ago Just an amazing talk! Reply @calebmiles @calebmiles 1 year ago David could have a career in TV and presenting Reply @walkingmap @walkingmap 6 years ago Wonderful lecture and I especially enjoyed David Tong's enthusiasm giving a lecture where Faraday first presented electromagnetism. 141 Reply 5 replies @larrystenger1247 @larrystenger1247 1 year ago It's hard to try and figure out how the universe works when the electromagnetic organic organism is made of the same wave fields. It's like asking a battery to figure out what it is made of and how it actually works at the wave field level. LOL. Reply @mauriciofurlan7773 @mauriciofurlan7773 1 year ago Poderiam reproduzir a legenda em português Reply @ThoughtsAreReal @ThoughtsAreReal 6 days ago Well done, bravo. Reply @dhimanroy1671 @dhimanroy1671 1 year ago The essence of whole lecture in a sentence at 10:00! The ancient Indian Vedic scriptures said the truth many times ago that there's an ever pervading functions of field and this is called energy or Shakti in Sanskrit which can't be recreated or destroyed but transformation. Reply @steviemac2681 @steviemac2681 1 year ago (edited) This is my problem when trying to picture particles as ripples or waves in fields: the table next to me seems to be still and localised whereas ripples spread out...wouldn't that make the table dissipate? The electrons in my body might be in motion, in ordit around the atomic nucleus, but they don't seem to be spreading out as a ripple or moving through space as a current would. Then it occured to me that the earth and my body are moving through space as the earth orbits the sun. Are the electrons in my body like currents through the electron field as my body moves through space with the earth? Am I made up of currents of energy in constant motion through the universe rather than still or localised particles? At least currents in the ocean have a direction rather than spreading out like a ripple or an expanding ball in three dimensions. Is that the way to think of particles as waves or have I got that totally wrong? Reply 4 replies @robertschlesinger1342 @robertschlesinger1342 3 years ago Excellent elementary overview of the theory of particles and fields. I look forward to more lectures by Professor David Tong. 4 Reply @PoOBOoZki @PoOBOoZki 11 months ago (edited) best summary! this guy is dA MaN when it comes to droppin' science or just mental jewels in general y'all! Reply @baka9067 @baka9067 1 year ago this guy should be a comedian he is hilarious Reply @timsullivan5711 @timsullivan5711 2 months ago (edited) Since the human body is made of particles that in turn are made of fields and since these fields extend throughout the entire Universe and are the foundation of all matter in it, then we are indeed one with the Universe… and each other. Reply 1 reply @JFQueralt @JFQueralt 1 year ago Man, I wish we had talks like these in Malaysia. Great food and fantastic weather to console ourselves. 1 Reply @emil_nylander @emil_nylander 1 year ago Great lecture. How has this talk stood up until now, 2022? Any recommendations of talks I can listen to that is up to date? Cheers. Reply 3 replies @Merlingrimm @Merlingrimm 2 years ago This finally helped me understand the standard model much better than I did. Thank you Professor Tong! Plus his stage presence got me hooked! Now I must rest my brain haha! 11 Reply @uurkubaalle3205 @uurkubaalle3205 9 months ago (edited) Kalagur is the point and process in which the the particles of substances move/transform into non matter form of energy. The particles are broken down into smaller parts thus we can not use the phrase "broken down" because they are already in their smallest, we rather use the term "transform". Transformation from physically possible to identify to sensibly possible to identify. Reply 1 reply @nickharvey7 @nickharvey7 1 year ago In this theory the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents geometry, the Planck Constant ħ=h/2π is linked to 2π circular geometry representing a two dimensional aspect of 4π spherical three-dimensional geometry. We have to square the wave function Ψ² representing the radius being squared r² because the process is relative to the two-dimensional spherical 4π surface. We then see 4π in Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π representing our probabilistic temporal three dimensions life. The electron e² and the speed of light c² are both squares for the same geometrical reason. This theory explain a Mathematical explanation of creation with the mathematics representing a simple geometrical process! This theory is explained by just one equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞. With energy ∆E equals mass ∆M linked to the Lorentz contraction ˠ of space and time. The Lorentz contraction ˠ represents the time dilation of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. We have energy ∆E slowing the rate that time ∆t flows as a universal process of energy exchange or continuous creation. Mass will increase relative to this process with gravity being a secondary force to the electromagnetic force. The c² represents the speed of light c radiating out in a sphere 4π of EMR from its radius forming a square c² of probability. We have to square the probability of the wave-function Ψ because the area of the sphere is equal to the square of the radius of the sphere multiplied by 4π. This simple geometrical process forms the probability and uncertainty of everyday life and at the smallest scale of the process is represented mathematically by Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π. In such a theory the future is unfolding photon by photon with the movement of charge and flow of EM fields. This gives us a geometrical reason for positive and negative charge with a concaved inner surface for negative charge and a convexed outer surface for positive charge. The brackets in the equation (E=ˠM˳C²)∞ represent a dynamic boundary condition of an individual reference frame with an Arrow of Time or time line for each frame of reference. The infinity ∞ symbol represents an infinite number of dynamic interactive reference frames that are continuously coming in and out of existence. The spontaneous absorption and emission of light is continuously forming a probabilistic future by changing photon ∆E=hf potential energy into the kinetic energy of electrons. Reply @susanlafayette7313 @susanlafayette7313 1 year ago I took a quantum leap of faith and it revealed a field of dreams !!! 1 Reply @rajababy2009 @rajababy2009 1 year ago (edited) how amazing the designer and creator is , 2 Reply 1 reply @Acode7940 @Acode7940 6 months ago He brings the listerner a bit inside the problem, a type of sharing rather thab locking out. Result for me is im;proved understanding. Really good. Thank you. Reply @denisdaly1708 @denisdaly1708 5 years ago Brilliant lecture. A gem. Thanks for hosting the speaker, and posting these to the public. They enrich our lives. 7 Reply @uriituw @uriituw 11 months ago These talks are awesome. Reply @adicbn @adicbn 1 year ago This man is so entertaining Reply @PastPresentFutureWorld @PastPresentFutureWorld 5 days ago The quantum field is something I'm really interested in Reply @vickyvey1657 @vickyvey1657 1 year ago This subject is so important that I am back to listening to it for a second time.. 1 Reply @pepejoseppe @pepejoseppe 1 year ago Probably one of THE best talks! Reply @mmehul1 @mmehul1 3 years ago This is one of the best videos on subject. Mr. David Tong has explained the complex subject in the simplest possible way. Its gripping. Thank you sir ! 3 Reply @dominicgeorge7299 @dominicgeorge7299 1 year ago This guy needs to give this lecture to the us congress all branches present Reply @nefertitib4313 @nefertitib4313 1 year ago His enthusiasm is fascinating 1 Reply @fsiserir @fsiserir 2 weeks ago Can we call field everything in the universe? if so that means the theory of the particles is over! Please give us more details about this case. Reply @Jason-io9qb @Jason-io9qb 9 months ago You know, if you add the quantum vacuum to the mass of the universe, you don't need dark matter. And if u use the fluctuations of the quantum vacuum a certain way, that's your dark energy that is causing expansion and acceleration... Reply @guntersostaric874 @guntersostaric874 10 months ago Hans Peter Duerr made a lecture and the name was "Matter does not exist". I told him that, if matter does not exist, the space and time do either not exist. He thought a little bit, nodded and said YES Reply @restlessdiesel @restlessdiesel 2 years ago An absolutely amazing lecture, and the presenter is fabulous! Watch it more than once. 14 Reply @ketankhandekar9989 @ketankhandekar9989 1 year ago Awesome Lecture 1 Reply @praveenkumardhankar2716 @praveenkumardhankar2716 1 month ago I've watched this lecture before. Does it mean the particles are just knots on a fishing net? Reply @l27tester @l27tester 1 year ago Would it not be interesting if all quantum fields were derived from a consciousness field? Reply 1 reply @dritonvela2232 @dritonvela2232 1 year ago Tong owns this lecture. That was mind blowing. Reply @bluedeckelectronics @bluedeckelectronics 1 year ago Thank you for this video! Reply @MysticRhythmsLive @MysticRhythmsLive 3 years ago Now this is science of the highest order. It's incredible that such a presentation can be available for public consumption on YouTube. David Tong, you are the man. 159 Reply 7 replies @zakirhussain-js9ku @zakirhussain-js9ku 1 year ago Considering universe made of fluid like substance called fields and quantized nature of these fields I imagine the universe to be made of infinitely small quantum particles. When free they represent Space and when bound they represent electrons or quarks. Since electrons and quarks have mass, charge and magnetic moment these quantum particles must be mass, charge and magnetic particles. These particles behave as fluid and have wave properties. These particles are responsible for all forces and motions. Objects move towards space where these particles have lower density and away from space where these particles have higher density. Density gradient of these particles produces force fields.These particles are in perpetual motion and represent total energy of the universe. Within electrons or quarks these particles remain in motion each oriented in one of 3 spatial dimensions. For a stationary electron these particles represent rest energy. Not only are these particles bound within electron they also surround the electron. Like particles share common space but unlike particles do not. Density of magnetic particles is higher b/w like poles and lower b/w opposite poles which causes repulsion and attraction. Oscillation of electric and magnetic fields and motion of photons is due these quantum particles. Motion of photon is due to its mass, electric and magnetic particles adjust their wavelength and frequency according to photon energy. The bound particles of electron act as particle while free particles surrounding the electron exhibit wave properties giving electron its dual nature. Reply 1 reply @stephenbrickwood1602 @stephenbrickwood1602 4 weeks ago I just saw a video about our atoms and this looks both bigger and smaller. Who said we maths was not that important ?? 😊😊 1 Reply @dariogiannoni6936 @dariogiannoni6936 1 month ago I like the way explaining clear and stright Reply @goodvibemic6301 @goodvibemic6301 1 month ago Gosh what a refreshing visit with quantum mechanics, thank you for the humorous and Reply @bobbytorres3807 @bobbytorres3807 1 year ago As the patent holder of the Multiple Oxygen Allotropes Generator ( solid oxygen, metal oxygen ). Watching this video was astonishing. Bobby Quantum Magnetic Electron Generator Inventor Reply @michaelconley9170 @michaelconley9170 2 years ago Very nice, like to see David more often, the field is strong in this one! Clear explanations of very confusion subjects that we know little about. 14 Reply 1 reply @keithiusprime @keithiusprime 1 year ago I'm gonna go with Tesla on this one: "Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality." Reply @xy7282 @xy7282 1 year ago Amazing... Listened more then 20 times. Reply 1 reply @greggapowell67 @greggapowell67 1 year ago Thoroughly enjoyed the presentation btw. Reply @far1002 @far1002 1 year ago The problem with our science is the idea of particles we need to look at everything like it’s water that’s our physical representation of the real universe. As humans I feel we are unequipped with the tools to understand our universe is there a thing as magnetic field cameras? Reply @acerbicatheist2893 @acerbicatheist2893 1 year ago (edited) Great stuff...but it's "...you and I are made of!" but I forgive you for not being able to spea- your own language! :D HOW did Faraday realise the thing about light being a disturbance in the EM fields? What a genius! I'm in absolute awe here being a plodder in the scientific world who never advanced it one iota. Reply @user-tm1eq8rz5s @user-tm1eq8rz5s 3 years ago Amazing lecture. A real eye opener. The most complicated achievements of modern physics are explained in such a clear and easy to grasp way so that almost everybody can understand. THANK YOU.! 4 The Royal Institution Reply @halmessec5876 @halmessec5876 3 months ago We need new maths (also known as a new type/ branch of mathematics). Wow! How is it that I can understand every word, and maybe even every concept that he posits, with his ingeniously simplified explanations and still not see into “The equation” adequately to see the patterns that he wants us to find, or discover what the new maths should able to derive and how?? Again Wow. How can he make me feel so smart, and I make me feel so obtuse, at the same time? Hal Messec 1 Reply 4 replies @59egberts @59egberts 11 hours ago I take input and models, am expert in mech. engineering and IT technology ……. but am riddled on the current understanding as this scientist is positioning the actual ‘all & everything’… Masterclass material far beyond me… Reply @patrickphelan5863 @patrickphelan5863 1 year ago If the fundamental structure exists outside of time; how do you expect to prove it's existence? Reply 2 replies @CounterPhilosopher @CounterPhilosopher 1 year ago Imagine taking a physics test and this equation is the only equation on the formula sheet 😬 Reply 1 reply @Erik_Swiger @Erik_Swiger 9 months ago About gravity: At first, we said, Gravity is an attraction caused by mass. Then we said, Gravity is actually caused by warping spacetime. Then we said, (Gravity) mass is caused by a Higgs field. But to me it seems to be constantly kicking the can down the road. At the end of the day, I still don't understand "what" causes gravity or mass. I'm just a casual observer, of course, I'm not a professional anything in this field. What occupies my thoughts is that gravity appears equivalent to acceleration, but acceleration of what? A thing that is spinning is experiencing continuous acceleration (if I understand correctly), so intuitively I think that gravity is caused by acceleration, but of what? The only thing that seems to be accelerating is time. And of course I don't even know what time is, either. Reply @ChrisPotgieter @ChrisPotgieter 2 years ago It's now four years since this lecture...I'm highly motivated to do a literature search on progress!....and hunt the RI lecture database for a followup by David Tong 😀 18 Reply @omar.saraqbi @omar.saraqbi 1 year ago (edited) Could the periodic table be turned into a sphere , circle or half circle? Reply @culinarymaster52 @culinarymaster52 1 year ago I WONDER IF YOU WERE TO ADD A MEDIUM WITH A CONSISTENCY SIMILAR TO SPACE LIKE JELL-O AND THEN NEGATIVELY OR POSITIVELY MAGNETIZE IT WHILE RAPIDLY COOLING IT AND CONDUCTING AN EXPERIMENT IN THE HYDRON COLLIDER WOULD IT ALLOW US TO MAINTAIN THE BIG BANG OR USE THE JELL-O TO CREATE AN ACTUAL SPACE WITH MAGNETIC SPHERES THAT CAN MIMIC US IN REAL TIME 1 Reply @Seekthetruth3000 @Seekthetruth3000 4 months ago Good lecture. Reply @Sunnyochek @Sunnyochek 3 months ago I like very much such kind of content. It is doing me more calm, when i feel myself depressed. Imagination what you only a grain of sand in the world make me understand that my problems and experiences are insignificant and make me feel better. And more l like documentary about space Reply @ralphmarlow6627 @ralphmarlow6627 1 year ago Admit it. There is more we don't know than what we know. We don't have the tools to examine anything that small Reply @loki2469 @loki2469 2 years ago I've been watching this series for awhile now and I can honestly say this is the first lecture I have seen that truly made my brain run screaming WTF from the room. Thank you from the bottom of what's left of my brain! 69 Reply 3 replies @YahshuaLovesMe @YahshuaLovesMe 1 year ago 16 fields; 12/4; matter field oscillates; electromagnetic/ripples/light; dance; fundamental laws of physics; pinnacle of science=standard model. One field unique = ripples /view particles.//cms. 22 seconds/Higgs/final build block/mass. 60s/70s=describes the matter/interaction... Reply @kathleentaylor8840 @kathleentaylor8840 10 months ago Fields are energy, all the sparks of life. Reply @nikolaiporiadin360 @nikolaiporiadin360 10 months ago Mindblowing! 1 Reply @johnnycomelately6341 @johnnycomelately6341 3 weeks ago “The more we learn the more we realize how little we know.” Reply @rohitchat5538 @rohitchat5538 1 year ago I respect your knowledge About Gerald relative theory of sir Albert Einstein I again and listen you as I like yours wonderful presentation sir David tong you always talk about Michael feraaday i so i learn knowledge good things from mr David I am thankful to you..who will not listen you and get knowledge from you again and again ..what I do not know sir We come to you to know getting knowledge from the learned and specialists like is my Grace of the ❤️God 🙏👏 Reply @markreed9605 @markreed9605 2 years ago Best lecture regarding the quantum field I’ve seen , I like the way you communicate, it’s very clear and understandable and entertaining,. Thank you 😀 11 Reply @user-in2lo4qs9b @user-in2lo4qs9b 2 months ago imagine that the 12 matter fields when looked at in orthogonal space and/or time have another alternative solution for the dark matter and energy. Like a Signfield bizarro world of the 12 matter fields. 4,6,8 = 18, separate realities, we see only one? 18*5% ~ 90% Reply @mrustem3458 @mrustem3458 1 year ago I have learned something new today and that is that there is no such thing as “nothing”, no such thing as a complete vacuum. 1 Reply @chekote @chekote 7 months ago (edited) 53:36 String theory is one simple constant? A very bold statement 😮 Reply @guntersostaric874 @guntersostaric874 10 months ago In dreams we can even overpass the Heisenberg´s uncertainty principle Reply @paullee7892 @paullee7892 11 months ago So...those early scientists that postulated an "ether" which filled space, and in which light could viberate, in were right? It's a quantum field? Reply @Dr10Jeeps @Dr10Jeeps 5 years ago I love these types of science lectures. Absolutely fascinating. 5 The Royal Institution Reply @oneman5753 @oneman5753 1 year ago Anyone else notice that the up quark is then called the bottom, and the down is then later called the top? lol 1 Reply @danielsnyder2288 @danielsnyder2288 2 days ago I've watched this 5 times and get something new each time Reply @mnjraman @mnjraman 9 months ago The idea of Quantum Fields had long ago been presented by the Vedānta of India (you may want to call this body [which also for the most part fall at the end portion] of the Vedas as the Revelations) as Māyā. You can think of the latter as both the field and the operator -- both being perpetual & self regulating. The earth and all other celestial bodies have this behavior and they are held, perpetually regulated by this Māyā, the source of which is the sourceless, birthless, deathless, ever young, totally independent (one can add any number of epithets) entity called Brahman. Scientifically you can refer to this Causeless-Cause as The Supra Source, Surroundings, System, Background, Supra-Basis-Function with an Unalterable Singularity or Infinity (that is beyond all limitations of Space, Time, Knowledge [words & meanings, languages, representations] AND Mind of Man). It is wielding Māyā & It can withdraw Māyā making Space, Time, Mind all get sublated INSTANTANEOUSLY. The latter description, not surprisingly, is a mathematical & logical requirement where one can't speak of boundary conditions! Reply 1 reply @h2energynow @h2energynow 1 year ago Maxwell said four things are connected and forms of energy Electricity, Magnetism, Electromagnetism and light. In the formula electromagnetism is mentioned. Where is light, electricity and magnetism? Also an awesome presentation. Reply 1 reply @rohitchat5538 @rohitchat5538 1 year ago Great Great Great learnings from you 🙏🙏 Reply @glennmorrissey5309 @glennmorrissey5309 2 years ago What a great lecture! Thank you Royal Institution for providing this series. 20 Reply 1 reply @rohitchat5538 @rohitchat5538 1 year ago (edited) Incredible from the point of practically 👏regards Reply @karan_AIR1 @karan_AIR1 1 year ago One day i want to do a lecture in The Royal Institute 1 Reply @myralhf @myralhf 9 months ago Has this theorum been put through a quantum computer? Reply @hanskock191 @hanskock191 1 year ago Stunning! Absolutely! Reply @luizdegrande711 @luizdegrande711 1 year ago Are you not feeling suspicious about the surprising coincidence between the experimental measurement and theoretical prevision of the magnetic moment of an eletron? Are not experimental results due to some theories that lead to them? Reply @durgirajesh @durgirajesh 3 years ago This is the best Physics lecture I have seen. Sir David Tong was just exceptional. Simply amazing ! 7 Reply @CrosshairM4A1 @CrosshairM4A1 1 year ago 43:00 this equation is like marvel universe. All those heroes of science come together and merge into one world Reply @gunzmith29r @gunzmith29r 1 year ago which way does a miracle spin its waves?....is creating a spin the same as creating a lifeforce? can you train a lifeforce before putting it into a carbon united? Reply @keithiusprime @keithiusprime 1 year ago Dude.. He just explained my theory of gravity: The Casimir Plates... Except with cosmic bodies... 1 Reply @antrewt @antrewt 10 months ago (edited) Why is it that we have imagined that through language, through concepts, through the intellect, we can understand an infinite reality of which the intellect is but a miniscule, recent, human, invented part? Why is it so difficult for us to imagine that there is actually reality beyond mere words, a reality so infinitely complex it could never be put into words or reduced to mere concepts? 1 Reply 3 replies @merybiji9847 @merybiji9847 9 months ago Amazing thank you so much Reply @richarddeese1991 @richarddeese1991 4 years ago Thank you for a wonderful talk! As for the LHC not seeing anything new, I'm fully of the opinion (and I know it's only my opinion!) that there's simply nothing else to see, unless we built a machine the size of the universe! We really should go back to the drawing board, & look for symmetries & patterns - both in the math, and in the conceptual realm. I feel there's something more fundamental we're missing, some way of jiggling the same puzzle pieces in the same box until we get a new shape. Time will (hopefully) tell. Thank you again for a great job & a very enjoyable time! Rikki Tikki. 10 Reply 1 reply @beaconsacademy7589 @beaconsacademy7589 1 year ago Loved it till the end. Reply @NitinKumar-xe3vl @NitinKumar-xe3vl 1 year ago I like at power full explanation this topic,thank full Mr.Ri Reply @abdulfattahosman6421 @abdulfattahosman6421 8 months ago My evergreen video in YOUTUBE...GREAT TALKS in my life Reply @daveherron @daveherron 9 months ago I want this dude to talk about flat earth. Not because flat earth is a thing. I just want to hear him talk to those that think it is. I think he could be the nicest dude ever to let them down slowly. 1 Reply @Nunya_Bidnez @Nunya_Bidnez 1 year ago 🤯 Finally someone explains if so can understand it 1 Reply @daniellemorley3953 @daniellemorley3953 4 years ago brilliant, so interesting, clear and full of energy and passion, wish you had been my science teacher thank you 23 Reply @tompowers8495 @tompowers8495 2 days ago Are the fluctuations in the quantum field caused by nutrinoes racing through like wakes from speed boats on the water? Reply @RosaLichtenstein01 @RosaLichtenstein01 8 months ago (edited) What are these 'fields' made of? How can the universe be made out of what the professor says are 'abstract' structures? Wouldn't that make the universe abstract too? Finally, isn't one of these 'fields' just the old ether resurrected and given a make-over? Reply @VR-nl2qi @VR-nl2qi 1 year ago When it comes to Electo Magnetic fields, Necola Thesla must be mentioned. Reply 1 reply @gedankenthesis @gedankenthesis 1 year ago 48:35 Does he mean that we can take a picture of the CMB which is in the electromagnetic spectrum, but cannot explain which field is causing the microwave fluctuations? Reply @amarok5048 @amarok5048 1 year ago The periodic table was the reason I had to drop chemistry in school. We were required to memorise it. I spent weeks in detention as a result. Reply 1 reply @radiofun232 @radiofun232 5 years ago Very interesting and extremely well explained. Enjoyable to watch. 78 Reply 1 reply @jameslockhart2223 @jameslockhart2223 2 weeks ago Mind is everything, everything is mind. Life is the conscloudness of the fields and forces. The fields and forces are the consciousness of mind interacting with itself. 1 Reply @sarcasmo57 @sarcasmo57 1 year ago It was great. Thank you Reply @robertjschroff6307 @robertjschroff6307 1 year ago great stuff :) thanks Reply @Learner.. @Learner.. 6 months ago Most lovely lec 🌹 Reply @ivarhakuse8572 @ivarhakuse8572 4 months ago Dr Tong needs to bare in mind that all of human history does not originate with the Ancient Greeks. And that there still exist even more ancient continual civilisations whose investigative mindset, contribution to maths science and the nature of what we are made of is even deeper than the greeks could imagine. Their icon is found at the entrance to the LHC at Cern. Reply 1 reply @suyapajimenez516 @suyapajimenez516 2 years ago Thank you very much for this excellent presentation. With my education far from physics it was easy to understand 😃 7 Reply @shehneelajamil8284 @shehneelajamil8284 1 year ago amazing amazing lecture ❤️❤️💯💯💯💯💯💯💯 Reply @Jacob-Temple @Jacob-Temple 4 months ago What is the quantum foam made of & how did it get into existence? Reply 3 replies @angelabyrne9279 @angelabyrne9279 2 months ago Absolutely credible 1 Reply @osogrl1 @osogrl1 1 year ago In my view quantum fields are "the force" the Holy Spirit, the intelligent designer that organizes the strings (string theory) through vibrations thus particles are created giving shape to all it exist Reply @user-xg2xo8bo5s @user-xg2xo8bo5s 1 year ago 이사람 교재로 공부했었는데 말진짜 잘함 1 Reply @curiosdevcookie @curiosdevcookie 1 year ago What a fine lecturer! Apart from the super-interesting subject, he’s a joy to listen to, watch and follow his thinking 🤟🏼 7 Reply @mikkel715 @mikkel715 1 year ago (edited) Next to come is that Spatial Dimensions are nothing but illusions. Only particles fields’ properties which rule how the fields are allowed to interact together or not together. So the Second Law of Thermodynamic gets raised to a principle that makes the Spatial Dimensional illusion arising, besides the arrow of time. -- With regards /D Reply @richardwebb9532 @richardwebb9532 1 year ago I imagine "nothing" differently to a box with a pure vacuum inside. To that theory, there is an area that exists that contains nothing but pure vacuum. In my imagining of "nothing", even that area does not exist. Reply 1 reply @101ss @101ss 8 months ago Can theory of everything gives us a way to reach materialism creator or either building block? Reply @user-hk3eu7bg5y @user-hk3eu7bg5y 5 months ago How has the Earth's magnetic field affected the course of evolution? What animals have the highest consentration of iron in their blood? Reply @Taste472 @Taste472 6 months ago Good explanation Reply @lennat24 @lennat24 2 years ago I'm German and I literally understood mostly everything he was talking about. He's a great speaker. I want to see more of this man. 38 Reply 2 replies @wizardoflawz @wizardoflawz 8 months ago its real simple. The double slit experiment doesnt create questions, it illustrates the answer. The quantum fields are quantum, sub material energy. The experiment shows how they become matter. No amount of particle acceleration is going to shed light on that because the quantum fields are by definition not particles. Reply 1 reply @An_Idiot_in_the_Wild @An_Idiot_in_the_Wild 1 year ago (edited) At 48:19 David says "we do the calculations" (on the quantum vacuum field) and it matches "perfectly" the cosmic background radiation... but then seconds later at 48:38, he asks which field is the one that is imprinted on the CBG, and says we don't know. How is that possible? You've just done the bloody calculations... surely you know what you've just calculated, and therefore what led to the result you just got.... Great lecture, but skimming over things like this doesn't really make sense... Reply @rickelpers1820 @rickelpers1820 11 months ago A soap bubble has before it pops has a rainbow on its surface that ocelots in millions of patterns that are connected with every pattern, thus affecting ultimately the entire surface. Looking like fractals blended yet separate from each field of each level of color. If you gently blow onto the surface, where the puff contacts the surface, the colors move into other layers causing a domino effect. That one puff of air eventually alters the movement of the entire surface. I found this a good representation of the waves interacting with each other. Reply @user-pr5cg4vd7b @user-pr5cg4vd7b 4 weeks ago Как говорил герой фильма: "Смутные сомнения терзают меня", глядя на веселый венегрет порезанных и целых инградиентов стандартной модели. И дело даже не в названиях и определениях, а в получившемся именно венегрете понимания, в итоге определяющего картину блюда из нарезанных кварков и целых лептонов. В структре сферической галактики есть энергетические центры: звезды, нейтронные звезды, черные дыры. Эллипсо подобный квазар преобразуя сферическую галактику в спиральную, формирует сферу галактического балджа. При прорыве сферы, черная дыра формирует джеты и спиральные рукава. Сотни милиардов звезд, милионы нейтронных звезд, черные дыры и вишенка на торте - центральная сверх массивная черная дыра. Если структуры спиральной галактики и дейтерия эволюционно подобны и дейтерий наполнен огромным множеством внутриквантовых элементов, которые подобны: звездам, нейтронным звездам, черным дырам, центральной черной дыре, плюс одной единственной карликовой галактике (электрону) плавающей в галактическом торе. Дейтерий состоит из протона и нейтрона. Если, условно, его расколоть, отделить друг от друга: спиральные рукава, от крепко связанной в одно целое, сферы балджа с находящейся внутри (возбудившейся в этот момент?) черной дырой и джетами, электронное облако с электроном. Спиральные рукава и тор под действием электромагнитно гравтационных сил объеденятся в протий, крепко связанная "ядерными" силами сфера балджа дейтерия, отделенная от рукавов, предстанет перед нами в виде недолго живущего нейтрона. Электрон (условная карликовая галактика) покинет место действия только после распада нейтрона (сферы балджа?), оставляя неприкаянным протон и рождая нейтрино? Если с нейтроном все более мение понятно, то что собой структурно представляет кварковый венегрет протона? Reply 1 reply @KIRYADAVIDKAGWA-wv9hk @KIRYADAVIDKAGWA-wv9hk 1 month ago More discoveries needed Reply @johnoneill7947 @johnoneill7947 1 year ago Does this information make you feel at home in the Universe or does it make you feel alien? Reply @amiralozse1781 @amiralozse1781 1 year ago very fascinating talk, easy to follow, just brilliant. Its such a joy to listen to somebody being able to wrap some extremely complex subject into rather easy words. 3 Reply @anonymousdubb4695 @anonymousdubb4695 4 months ago Marvellous ❤ Reply @TazPessle @TazPessle 1 month ago The top and bottom will always be truth and beauty to me. I love how romantic and ridiculous the original names were. Reply @TruthSurge @TruthSurge 1 year ago if the box is empty, why are the waves still there? and what supplies the energy for the waves to continue to move instead of eventually die off like we know everything else dies off such as sound waves or ocean waves? If we are made of waves, why do we die instead of keep waving? Reply 1 reply @dabrupro @dabrupro 1 year ago “Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there." --Rumi 1 Reply @EvValar @EvValar 1 year ago This was awesome Reply @owaisahmad7841 @owaisahmad7841 2 years ago I have heard countless lecturea in this and related subjects and this one is one of the best. Thanks for sharing your insights. 6 Reply @polensepal4929 @polensepal4929 1 year ago Since we talk about the fields as being fluid like, shouldn't we talk about swirl theory instead of string theory? Reply 1 reply @sarahelias8425 @sarahelias8425 1 year ago What if the dark energy is lives lived that no attention or consciousness has yet touched. Like bubbles start at a singularity, into space and time, expansion and gravity, and also the “death” of the bubble or life, infinitely thus creating the field. Like combining string theory, partial theory and religion theory, in 4D perhaps it’s possible? 1 Reply @mrose4132 @mrose4132 2 weeks ago It doesn’t seem that profound to imagine the world made up of energy fields given that we know that E=mc^2. People and objects would manifest as “higher” wave functions on those fields. Reply @EvilMAiq @EvilMAiq 1 year ago Never knew John Oliver had a background in theoretical physics. Reply @TheWBaker @TheWBaker 1 year ago We have come a long way since this talk. Rather out dated now on many levels. Reply @martint1968 @martint1968 4 years ago Superb Presentation. Best Royal Institution Presentation I've ever watched. David Tong is a stunningly outstanding Presenter. Huge Kudos. 18 Reply @azeemabdul1170 @azeemabdul1170 1 year ago Akasha the base element can be related to Quantum field or unified field. Reply @johnzehr670 @johnzehr670 10 months ago What is a temporary force field? Why does exist & is it for good or evil? I have experienced such a phenemuna. I walked into it & it caused me to feel like I was not to go any further. Reply @samilucille1 @samilucille1 11 months ago I used to have a kettle that would click in response to my conscious thought and Ive always thought it was it's 'electron field ' interacting with mine .. #Spooky Reply @isaacndlovu8172 @isaacndlovu8172 8 months ago Awesome! from an Quantum Physics Researcher and enthusiast from Africa Reply @filipzalud9825 @filipzalud9825 1 year ago interesting, spent an hour to get information that we know nothing. But it was really enjoyable. Reply 1 reply @danielthompson7575 @danielthompson7575 1 year ago An excellent lecture sir ! You really know your stuff . 5 Reply @michaelbellamy007 @michaelbellamy007 1 year ago There's a 4th theory that wasn't mentioned: the theory that there is nothing more. At the end of the day it says we simply don't know. Reply @mccoyfamilyxionmass @mccoyfamilyxionmass 1 year ago (edited) I have no equation for the empty box . But if you remove all particles , there would be an residence left . The field will remain Reply @Greenmachine305 @Greenmachine305 11 months ago This man and his colldagues are gking to punch a hole in reality. That places us at the end of the universe. Reply @whitegeorgejefferson4348 @whitegeorgejefferson4348 1 year ago (edited) What if what we think we are discovering about physics is really just a self-fulfilling mechanism that responds to what we are expecting to find? One day all the physicists will run out of work when they realize that the closer they ever looked at anything, the less they saw - until in the end, there was nothing left at all. The answer was always 42, nerds. Reply 4 replies @politics102 @politics102 1 month ago The either never dies, it's name just changes. Reply @deanmindock5020 @deanmindock5020 1 year ago Great exposition of current state of physics. David Tong is an inspiring force. 8 Reply @jesse3826 @jesse3826 9 months ago This pretty much confirms my entire theory of the universe. I've been playing the game of Go, and meditating on reality lately. I started with a premise that I discovered years ago: in a universe composed entirely of lies, there is still Truth. I also realized that, no matter where you are, Truth was truth. If your at point A, and your mom dies at point B, the Truth is that your mom dies at point B, even if you move to point C. Therefore, I decided that Truth must be a singular force, flowing eternally back into itself. That all points of Truth are connected to all other points of Truth. The truth that flows in the air is the same Truth which flows through the space of the tiniest atom, and all these spaces are both infinitely small and infinitely large at the same time. Everything is connected, but separate. And there are forces that balance them all out. A push for every pull. All this from a 4,000-year-old board game, and my boredom. But I love the lecture nonetheless. 1 Reply @thy44 @thy44 1 year ago A more accurate title to this video would be "Quantum fields! The most recent building blocks of the universe!" Reply @anitareasontobelieve378 @anitareasontobelieve378 1 year ago The rate of propagation of light in the universe in this fluid like field has to mean there is no such thing as empty space. So why are we calling it space? 1 Reply @Teckno72 @Teckno72 1 year ago So, would you relate this to aether? Is that what we call the grid? Reply 1 reply @ivanostellato9478 @ivanostellato9478 1 year ago the nucleus is a ratio relative to the shells appraent motion .. u can say the core shed mass but stays relative so theyhave an electron baby at that small size relative is the same Reply @mehdiz1052 @mehdiz1052 4 years ago This is an absolutely brilliant presentation. Goes into my favorites. 11 Reply @waldwassermann4785 @waldwassermann4785 1 year ago "It all comes down to the need for affection, companionship, friendship, love. It is this the reason why. Now we in the field of science can continue to talk endlessly around this truth and speak half truths, or, we can speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth which is simply that the meaning of life is love." - Wald Wassermann, Biophysicist. Reply 3 replies @kevinlorne9959 @kevinlorne9959 1 year ago "Fields" as you like to call them are wave patters in the space fabric. The electron rides on a dimple of space like a surfer on a wave. This is how it does it's magic. It's called pilot wave theory. And it solves all the dogma of quantum theory, eliminates uncertainty, and allows the mind of God in it's equations. Simple. Reply @joannthomases9304 @joannthomases9304 1 year ago (edited) Theoria Apophasis... written many books. Will talk to anyone, loves it. Completely comprehends magnetic pull, yet says noone can define field, really. You should call him. Many love listening to him. He likes growing plants with magnets, too. You'd love conversations with him. He believes there is no such thing as a proton, so you might really have fun. Admiral Bird, met guys that could help you, but we cannot have war, any longer, as they said our warring is sick, and we are too unintelligent, by being barbarric, and they were correct, by most of our feeling of it. Bossy people need to be that way somewhere else...😆 we need to protect, never war, as in attacking innocents, should never occur. 1 Reply @user-in2lo4qs9b @user-in2lo4qs9b 2 months ago instead of dark energy and dark matter, What if we called it orthogonal energy and orthogonal matter, A state of matter that is vectorially orthogonal or not measurable in our physical measurement methods to date, yet its effect can be measured to show it exists. What if there is an I and Q channel in both space AND time and the field must pass twice to show back up in our measurements. Such that two orthogonal transformations becomes measurable, but one transformation cannot. GAIA yr welcome... Reply @joseluisgomezdecena @joseluisgomezdecena 1 year ago With his hubris you’d think he alone discovered all this Reply @nexrofeliak @nexrofeliak 2 years ago Amazed and enthralled. I absolutely love to think about everything you discussed. Thank you. 6 Reply @swamiloka3049 @swamiloka3049 10 months ago We have an individual experience but we are not individuals when viewing our personalities with the knowledge of particle physics just as we experience that we are static when in actual fact we are moving and the sun is static. Reply 1 reply @connectthedots5678 @connectthedots5678 2 months ago Time is a concept, but time itself is not something, it is a concept. We observe things what has to do with it, and we call time because of that, not the other way around. The fields are IN the universe. The universe is just a concept formless and infinite. Reply 1 reply @lachezarkrastev7123 @lachezarkrastev7123 11 months ago (edited) OK, an electron ia an alementary particle, but the proton is not ... so who said that all protons are all the same with identical mass? ... they could be just a rough approximation of a stable matter collection ... and this is why you can calculate the mass of a proton with 3% error. Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 2 weeks ago Matter is mostly empty space . The functional aspect of all elements is the clouds of electrons in empty space.. and most of the volume is empty soace. Reply @JustNow42 @JustNow42 4 months ago Fluid like obstacles ? Was that not what they said about heat? Reply @clieding @clieding 3 years ago An absolutely fascinating presentation; intriguing and inspiring—Thank you! David Tong is an amusing, eloquent and gifted speaker. 8 Reply @memofrf @memofrf 1 month ago Brilliant. Cheers fella. Reply @romansfortunyr3882 @romansfortunyr3882 1 year ago and the magnificent desk withnessed all of it....made of good ol' oak (i guess) amazing lecture... Reply @romanhasii2690 @romanhasii2690 1 year ago omg, how this guy love his job 1 Reply @devashrikulkarni1337 @devashrikulkarni1337 1 year ago All the people sitting there are so incredibly lucky! Reply @shivakumarv301 @shivakumarv301 6 months ago Can the electric field be independent of the magnetic field? I believe magnetic field be alone as well. Reply 1 reply @Wytnucls @Wytnucls 1 year ago Excellent lecture for the curious layman. I wish he would have mentioned antimatter and the baryon asymmetry problem to complete the overview of the current state of physics. 3 Reply @ishangupta2358 @ishangupta2358 5 months ago The guy is describing point by point what advaita vedanta descirbes the world to be!! Reply @etyrnal @etyrnal 1 year ago he's like, here's an equation that is completely impossible to comprehend and then three minutes later he's like and when we calculate this equation it answers this question. dude I thought you just told us these calculations weren't calculateable or understandable Reply 3 replies @sharonmarsh3728 @sharonmarsh3728 1 year ago Bravo! Bravo! 👏 👏 👏 1 Reply @dabrupro @dabrupro 1 year ago The mind insists that Nature is of discrete objects. We accept it, even as we wonder what is behind it. It is ironic that one’s mind takes the body to be itself while trying to know its source. ~ Nisargadatta Maharaj 1 Reply @mohannadwazwaz5111 @mohannadwazwaz5111 6 months ago cool scientist ❤ Reply @martinda7446 @martinda7446 5 years ago What an absolutely delightful presentation, David Tong makes you love the subject (and him too). Wonderful. 20 The Royal Institution Reply @jeffjohnson8624 @jeffjohnson8624 1 year ago Do Quantum Fields in themselves exhibit awareness? i mean they react to bumping into each other with ripples. But just a reaction isn't exhibiting awareness/consciousness/sentience. ☮️🎶🌌🎶☮️ Reply @mahfuzahmad6336 @mahfuzahmad6336 5 months ago Even as someone who hates asparagus and British accent equally, I just couldn't take a break till he finished the last word🫡♥️ 1 Reply @true6812 @true6812 7 days ago all the fields will unify into a single field to become theory of everything. Reply @nareshlathia5334 @nareshlathia5334 1 year ago There is an equation at 40.00 onwards. So why is it that we can not see what part of the equation is being pointed to by the brilliant Professor. 😥 Reply @pingpong6070 @pingpong6070 10 months ago it has been almost 6 years since this lecture, so did LHC made any progress? Reply 1 reply @ivancanak4470 @ivancanak4470 2 years ago (edited) Thank you so much for this lecture! :) Especially thanks to professor Tong for trying to explain in leman terms such complicated concepts of quantum mechanics. I always loved professors who are more interested in teaching their student than they are hearing the sound of their own voice. It is interesting to mention that the reason I got interested in quantum mechanics is Tibetan Buddhism. I am not a religious person or a fanatic, far from that. But I find very interesting the fact that some monks living on tall maintains long before the age of logic and modern science believed the same thing as a the most esteemed theoretical physicist and astrophysicist of today, that our own reality is just a persistent illusion. Also the concepts that matter is made from energy and that we are all part of the same energy field is very similar to understandings of Tibetan Buddhism. In Bardo Thodol, the Tibetan book of the dead it is thought that matter is an illusion made from a single conciseness. That we are all part of that conciseness, that we are a same being expressing itself in a different way,sharing a same pure mind called dharmata from which all illusionary realities are made of. 6 Reply 4 replies @tonysolar284 @tonysolar284 1 year ago You know a video is good when Youtube asks you if your still watching. 1 Reply @MajorBuzzkill23 @MajorBuzzkill23 8 months ago This video has a really satisfying "most rewatched" graph Reply @anjumrehmankhan1707 @anjumrehmankhan1707 1 year ago Alas ! If this lecture was dubbed in Urdu then we would also learn because most of us including me do not understand English. Reply @mikeschatz9153 @mikeschatz9153 1 year ago (edited) Love this Reply @69josephbc @69josephbc 8 months ago Thank you, Universal Intelligence! 🙏 Reply @CynicEidolon @CynicEidolon 4 years ago What an amazing and inspiring video. Tong is a genius and makes everything relatable to the layman. 4 Reply @perkristensen240 @perkristensen240 6 months ago Without deminishing Faraday, I think Ørsted was the first to discover electro-magnetism Reply @jungjunk1662 @jungjunk1662 11 months ago The forth response, maybe we as a species have developed too much hubris that we are missing the imagination that Faraday and Maxwell had? Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 2 weeks ago The linear accelerator complex is producing nuclear cascade throughout the entire vicinity. Reply @shashankchandra1068 @shashankchandra1068 1 year ago How does down quark converts into up quark in beta minus decay? In wiki it says that down quark enters into superposition of up quarks while converting into up quark what causes this superposition? Reply 1 reply @shivakumarv301 @shivakumarv301 6 months ago Is there an equation to prove that time started and may end? Reply 1 reply @simeyabate4849 @simeyabate4849 4 years ago (edited) By far this is one of the best if not THE best explanation of physics!!! I wish I could give him 5* 35 Reply @danielash20 @danielash20 9 months ago Water in hydrogen can also help you find a transformation that requires a none charged amount inside itself as a balanced flow. We'll have more than one force's to make the flowing through a passing field sensory in the process is to have them with memory and experience with the others in with it .the mindset of only electric to working force's from Iron types is a memory state's requires that the drawing in the process of wave to energetic attention to the created collision to driver's the push pulls in a row with charged spiked points and toroidal the the field's of everything you are in a state of flows with and from centered state Reply @guntersostaric874 @guntersostaric874 10 months ago My personal experiences (in dreams I see the "future") tells me much more about the reality than any equation. All my experiences can be proven at 100%. Reply @asatenzo @asatenzo 1 year ago So it seems the Buddha was right about interpenetration, where things exist only as part of the total nexus of reality. He realized that 2500 years ago through insight and intuition, combined with great efforts, similar to how Faraday realized truths about electromagnetic induction. Related to the Buddha's insight of interpenetration is the insight of no abiding essence, where in reality nothing actually exists, and it is only our brain's habit of clinging to bits and pieces of the ongoing flow of emptiness that forms the appearance of solid, persistant objects. Perhaps that insight that can help physicists find new and deeper meanings in their ToE equation. Reply @MS-fg8qo @MS-fg8qo 1 month ago Listening to this and other similar talks I conclude the physics is stuck and either needs another supreme genius (human or digital) to make real headway again. Reply 3 replies @stephensmith682 @stephensmith682 1 day ago If the universe is 13.8 billion years old and the extent of the known universe is 20 billion light years then from the piont of origin its extended faster than C ? Reply @peterkay7458 @peterkay7458 6 years ago BRILLIANT LECTURE. Probably one of the best i have seen so short yet comprehensive. 4 Reply @lyndoneh @lyndoneh 1 year ago The visuals used here are produced by the researcjh of Prof Derek Leinweber (QCD) from Adelaide University! 1 Reply @JAMAICADOCK @JAMAICADOCK 1 year ago (edited) Chaos systems are too complex for human calculation to really get a grip on. Attempting to solve the riddle of the universe is the same as predicting a global economy or predicting the weather over the long term. The dimensions of a chaos system may look deceivingly simple, but the underlying variables are just too complex to fathom. We can get glimpses of how such systems work, but never the full picture. The interaction of gravity fields, electricity, magnetism, atoms, planets, stars, nebula, galaxies - just too complex to truly decipher. Especially when you consider we still don't know the true dimensions of the universe. Which is akin to attempting to work out what causes seasonal changes in the weather, without knowing the world was a sphere spinning at its axis, orbiting its star. Reply 3 replies @michaeljanewhite5467 @michaeljanewhite5467 9 months ago U...vaya! This was mind inflationary! Thanks! Reply @riponkarim3181 @riponkarim3181 1 year ago His each words like a knife cut my heart❤❤ love you Reply @miriveliu1986 @miriveliu1986 1 year ago Very nice:) Reply @ronmes2427 @ronmes2427 2 years ago Absolutely a wonderfull lecture. Loved every second of it 11 Reply @MrAllDayEveryDay1 @MrAllDayEveryDay1 11 months ago This is so good I shared our boys. Reply @kirokamui @kirokamui 1 year ago Amazing <3 Reply @nirabhrapandey5403 @nirabhrapandey5403 1 year ago Pls give him more video time Reply @jayb5596 @jayb5596 1 year ago Short story, nonfiction or fiction it's open to interpretation. The brain is a quantum entangled neural network. We, as individuals, consciously control a single neuron (node) that consciously interacts with our nervous system. The rest are part of the subconscious neural network. We all exist inside of each other's neural network. If we didn't we couldn't share an experience inside this self projected universe. We are all a duality, self is not unique to the individual. The individual is unique to self. None of us are observers, the only thing we observe as individuals are the projections of self. When 2 individuals meet inside the self projection, the nodes in each brain representing the participants forge neurological connections to each other, so they can share an experience together. Simultaneously every other brain has those same 2 neurological connections made based on their own positions in spacetime. Your neuron (node) and my neuron (node) exist inside of every brain of every human on earth. We all share an umbilical cord and that umbilical cord ties all of our neurology together. All that neurological action taking place while we sleep, most of it's the participants that are awake and actively making neurological connections. Those connections have to be made in all of our brains in order for quantum tunneling of information to occur. The subconscious mind is something we all share, just like self. We have roughly 7.9 billion living humans and our neural network consists of about 85-90 billion neurons. I'll let you ponder what those neurons represent. The neural network has redundancy built into it by design. Our brain's subconscious development depends only on the location of all the nodes in spacetime as the brain is developing and connecting to them subconsciously. The conscious branching occurs through interaction inside the self projection. Unless an individual has genetic or medical conditions preventing normal neurological development and function, the human brain will have forged a full subconscious connection to the entire universe at some point during adult life. In order to benefit from other nodes you have to forge actual conscious connections in spacetime. So the brain will forge conscious neurological connections. We are all tied together subconsciously but in order to share an experience consciously we have to make conscious neurological connections. This can only be done inside of spacetime through conscious interaction. Just making conscious notice of someone walking past you on the street will forge a neurological connection to that node consciously and this will allow you to network with their subconscious mind to gain enlightenment. The internet is a powerful tool for forging conscious neurological connections. Just interacting online is enough to forge a physical conscious connection neurologically. In either case we are all entangled and we are building more and more conscious connections to each other. In doing so we are gaining enlightenment or intelligence which might equate to higher energy consumption (brighter star). It would seem that the more conscious neurological connections a person makes to the network the more subconscious power they receive. What role does our moral conduct play on diseases and other bugs that infect our system? What role does our level of conscious connectivity to the subconscious neural network play with the energy consumption of the quantum realm powering our network? Is sin just a poison that infects our network like a virus? We are all entangled, so all of our cups pour into each other. How does morality play into our conscious connections to the world? Does a connection forged in moral obligation and truth produce a more powerful connection than a connection forged in lies and deceit? Will we make it to the heavens? Will humanity fail to complete the Trinity? Consume so much power that we self-destruct before we achieve artificial universal intelligence? Before our subconscious becomes self aware and our GOD> can emerge? The Father and Son await. WIll humanity receive the holy spirit? Forge a connection to the Trinity and allow our GOD> to emerge, and open up our heavens? Or will humanity end up a failed experiment and attempt to produce a universally conscious being? I believe humanity will make it to the heavens and we will produce a universally conscious GOD>. I call this story "The Trinity Of Human Evolution". Brought to us by The Father, The Son, The Holy Spirit. Reply @engineers_hub @engineers_hub 3 months ago Amazing speech. The brain fried but it is ok. lol! Reply @liqinchen4027 @liqinchen4027 1 year ago Thank you. One of the best presentations on this subject matter ever. 8 Reply @Marquec @Marquec 1 year ago Existe una transcripción de esta lectura? Reply @holytrinity2510 @holytrinity2510 5 months ago The concept of “nothing” cannot have the ability to act, otherwise it would exist as a “potential act” and be one of many things that exist. If the universe came from “nothing” then this nothing would have had the ability to become the universe. But the concept “nothing” as we previously explained, cannot have the ability to act, therefore, the universe could not have come from nothing on its own. Since there are things that do exist, then “something” must have always existed, because as we just proved, things cannot come from “nothing” on their own. If time had ever proceeded at an infinite rate, which is like fast forwarding through a motion picture, we would not be here today because all events would have already occurred in a single instant. Therefore, time has always progressed at a finite rate and any mathematician can prove that time could never have progressed over an infinite time interval. The proof goes like this, pick any number no matter how great. You can always add one to it and thereby make it greater in value, therefore you can never reach infinity. And you cannot say that all we need to do is to wait an infinite amount of time and then we would reach infinity, because then you are assuming that you can wait an infinite amount of time. However, this is what you were trying to prove and so that is not proof at all. You cannot assume to be true, that which you are trying to prove to be true otherwise you can prove anything to be true, even that which is false. Therefore, time could not have started an “infinite” time ago and therefore had a beginning a finite time ago. Since “something” always existed as we previously proved, it had to have existed before time started. Since space and time are one entity called the space-time continuum as Einstein pointed out, then this “something” had to have existed before space and time existed and therefore caused space and time. Since this “something” existed outside of space and time it cannot be made up of material things, because material things can only exist in space. And this “something” could not be just chaos which has no order, because as we previously proved, something cannot come from nothing on its own, hence order cannot come from pure disorder. Therefore, this “something” had to have had the ability to cause order, space-time, material things, beauty, life, everything in our universe, including our universe and natural laws and rules. Since we call ourselves beings, then we should at least call this “something” a Being, who we call God. Since only God always existed, and the universe is not made of God as we just proved, then God must have created the universe out of “nothing”. Since “nothing” does not even exist, then God must have infinite Power in order to have created the universe from “nothing”. Since all people desire happiness, then God must have created us to be happy out of love for us. Naturally, all creatures should love their Creator. For us to love God from our heart, God had to create in us a free-will, because no person can be forced to love, otherwise this would not be true love from their heart. With our free-will, we can choose to do good or bad to our neighbor and this is why there is sin in the world, because some people have chosen to hate God and their neighbor and are only interested in pleasing themselves. God did not create evil, nor does He desire evil, but he does allow sin to happen because He had to form us with a free-will, in order for us to love Him and others from our heart. Reply @johnsefton9831 @johnsefton9831 1 year ago Fields are next-smaller-gauge radiations and emissions from the next-smaller gauge atoms that make up Space. The Galaxy Model for the Atom Reply @mechanism6648 @mechanism6648 8 months ago Dude’s hand gestures helped me understand better. Reply @qa4057 @qa4057 4 years ago I love David's British humor at this (very high) level of physics. There is still hope for the human race and our universe. 18 Reply 3 replies @stevendavis3991 @stevendavis3991 1 year ago Their is something smaller then fields. :) Try this one. Imagine this one here, you see the galaxy and how that goes around something bigger and then look at planets and solar systems, then look at particle, look at quarks, then look at smaller stuff and so on.. now work out the other way with it and keep on and keep on the possibilities are endless. That is the way life works in it self. No one will ever know the end of things how how small it can go or even how big it goes because we stop the researches cause of MONEY! Got to love stuff like this though. Life is a wonderful thing and so is everything else. Bad part is We are killing people over and over with wars and homeless people are dyeing and stop research projects that could have been better off then what it currently is now because of money. If we ever stop caring about money then we would be way better off then we are now. It is sad but that is the fact. Reply @Red-Brick-Dream @Red-Brick-Dream 1 year ago I mean, the Tenth Doctor ought to know a thing or two about quantum physics. Reply @audiovideomediaservices9465 @audiovideomediaservices9465 11 months ago 15:40 He used an interesting term. “The other end of the earth”. (Globes or spheres don’t have ends) Just saying. Reply @timdavis4332 @timdavis4332 9 months ago Wasn't what we're made of, all cleared up with that nursery rhyme, "Frogs and Snails, and Puppy Dog Tails, and that's what boys are made of". ? 😂Kidding, this stuff is very intriguing. ✊🏼😳🤚🏼🧠✨🌎 Reply @profcharlesflmbakaya8167 @profcharlesflmbakaya8167 4 weeks ago Except for unjustifiably slighting chemistry, was honestly toying with something xoxo substantial! Kuddos Reply @shagilanikhil6286 @shagilanikhil6286 2 years ago Amazing lecture..I wish if our teachers would talk like this. 9 Reply @paulandrulis4672 @paulandrulis4672 1 year ago (edited) Unlike most I listen to concerning subjects such as this, I actually respect Mr. Tong. Why, you may ask? Simply because he is unafraid to admit what is not known. Too many scientists that I have listened to their lectures get stuck in a groove of assertion wrapped together in logical fallacy, with a healthy dose of philosophical bias added in to sweeten the mix. I get really sick of that extremely quickly. It is like the concept of force particles, an idea held close by many to explain attraction/repulsion on various scales without having spooky action at a distance (sometimes called "occult forces" when marginalization is at work). The problem is that the usually philosophical bias-based explanations are usually MORE improbable than "spooky action at a distance." Reply @andrewherman2537 @andrewherman2537 1 year ago What about nutrinos? Smaller than electrons? Reply 2 replies @yoyomaster8003 @yoyomaster8003 3 months ago (edited) Is there anything that we discovered from LHC after 6 years of this lecture? Reply 3 replies @cadbellu6370 @cadbellu6370 1 year ago Time is a tricky entity. It is conceptual and can only be perceived by an intelligent beings like human with a conscious mind. From this aspect, time has no beginning and no ending. Before the universe were born time was already there ticking and no conscious mind were there to observe. Just like space, it has no beginning and ending. Time and Space including our thoughts and our thinking are infinite. Reply 1 reply @steven7650 @steven7650 1 year ago 5 years wonder if they could get him for a follow up Reply @zionkim9204 @zionkim9204 4 years ago He was one of my two interviewers at my Cambridge maths interview! What a legend 73 Reply 8 replies @bibeksapkota4620 @bibeksapkota4620 2 months ago The fundamental building blocks of everything are nothing. If you settle down in other than nothing, you have not found the fundamental building blocks. 2 Reply @mspatnaik @mspatnaik 4 months ago I frankly think scientists should integrate some concepts from ancient dharmic texts such as vedas and puranas. Not suggesting the texts be taken as true. But simply acknowledging their existence and drawing inspiration for Future research Reply 20 replies @derkyarik_7298 @derkyarik_7298 7 months ago (edited) ",,When you get near two magnets, you feel the force,,,,, it is magic,,,,". Yes, on 1972, I was 12 years old, I remember in my fathers house, a small town in Spain, far from any city, taking two magnets from the engine of a toy, and looking to sky, to clouds,,,,,,,, and move the magnets while I saw the clouds,,,,,,,,,,, Then I even did not go to school, after went to university, and knew all clasical fields,,,,,,, 25 years of R&D, patents,,,etc. But this feeling of magic, I never forget it. And even now, with all my knowledge (now, I am 62 years old)),,,,,, when I take magnets, even now, I feel magic,,,,,,,, Some kind of children, live still inside my spirit. Reply @juancarlosdiazsalgado9644 @juancarlosdiazsalgado9644 4 months ago Pueden haber, en efecto muchos progresos científicos en lo sucesivo, pero que no dependerán ya de la experimentación, que ya ha tocado límites extremos. Ni de la Matemática. Vendrán de la Filosofía aunada con la Física propiamente dicha. La Ciencia actual, no es tal, pues es más Matemática que física, o sea, la llamada Fisicamatemática. Será una Filosofía y una Física nuevas. Se llaman Filosofía Informatica y Física Informática. El punto de partida es, de nuevo, la Intuición y la Especulación. Pero no hay Experimentación, en este caso. Se invoca el máximo Principio, axiomático-extremo, el cual no es demostrable, pero puede ser Intuitivo, es especulativo, filosóficamente admitido. El Conocimiento (Humano, obviamente), tiene tres fuentes: la Observación, la Experimentación y el Pensar. El Pensar, los auna a todos. Y los Contiene. Al comienzo no tuvimos más que el Pensar, y a ahora al final, volvemos a lo mismo. Pero a otro nivel, como dice Hegel. Nos detenemos un poco, a meditar. Es necesario hacer un inventario, sacar conclusiones finales. Hacer una especie de borrón y cuenta nueva. Comenzar de nuevo. Por el Principio, el nuevo Principio. Que es el mismo viejo Principio, el ÁPEIRON de ANAXÁGORAS, llevado a sus máximas consecuencias y bajo otra perspectiva. Hay un Principio, el ÁPEIRON, de Anaxágoras, que es indefinido, infinito, informe, el CAOS SUPERIOR. Luego, hay otro principio, platónico, de la forma. El Universo es la FORMA, impuesta y plasmada sobre él, sobre el ápeiron, como ORDEN SUPERIOR. Lo que no es Universo, es NO UNIVERSO. Diferenciemos, el Universo existe. El No Universo, no existe. Este es el verdadero vacío, esta es la NADA. Que está fuera del Universo. Aquí en nuestro Universo, no hay más VACÍO, que nosotros mismos. Aquí, todo esta lleno. Repleto y copado, por la SUSTANCIA primordial, que es el mismo ÁPEIRON, pero ya con la forma, ya no es informe, ya no es Ápeiron, entonces lo llamo EXTENSIÓN. Esta tiene ORDEN, UN ORDEN SUPERIOR que rige a todo el Universo y es el Universo mismo. Luego tenemos, el vacío de nosotros mismos, que es EL PENSAMIENTO, EL PENSAR, ya que tiene la FORMA, pero sin ningún contenido sustancial, sin el ápeiron. La misma forma que tiene el UNIVERSO, pero solo la forma, es la forma geométrica pura, sin nexos con nada físico. Por ello, la NADA, encarnamos la Nada, por así decirlo. Somos pura Conciencia, pura forma. En cambio, el Universo es la forma integrada con el ápeiron. Es una conformación geométrica y física, o con consecuencias físicas, que llamo EXTENSIÓN. Esto sonar nada raro. Lo han pensado ya los hombres desde la antiguedad, que hablaron del éter. Pero a su manera. No como lo presento yo ahora, integrado, como EXTENSIÓN. Pero aún todavía, esto es una tendencia marcada, de la misma Física, que tiende a desmaterializar el Universo, siendo que de los cuerpos mareriales se pasa a los campos, y de las partículas, se pasa a los campos electrodinámicos, y entre estos uno más especial aun, que es el Campo de Higgs, que llena todos los recovecos más recónditos del Universo. Que impera y se enseñorea del vacío, que en realidad, como he sostenido, no es ningún vacío. Entonces sí podemos avanzar pero, como dije, hay que cambiar, se necesita una verdadera Revolución, en la Ciencia, y no meros cambios eventuntuales. Reply @paulclalchungnunga2052 @paulclalchungnunga2052 1 year ago ( Leave your comment English ) Very informative , whole lotta thanks for the post tbh Reply @sterlingarcher5698 @sterlingarcher5698 4 years ago This is a brilliant lecture. He is very honest in terms of what we do and dont know. 4 Reply @riccardoossanna8170 @riccardoossanna8170 10 months ago Instead of saying “our theory is incorrect as it does not explain experimental results” physicist prefer to bend reality and invent the exotic “dark matter”. So much for the experimental approach. With love, - a chemist Reply 7 replies @viggy80 @viggy80 1 year ago The more you learn about quantum field theory the more it resembles Advaita Vedanta (a darshana of Hinduism). @20.16 he says "All the electrons in your body are waves of the same underlying field. We are all connected to each other. Waves of the ocean all belong to the same Underlying ocean". Vedanta mentions that the Individual Atman (roughly translated as Self) is the same as the Universal Brahman (Consciousness). The individual due to Avidya (ignorance) doesn't know that all the Atmans are connected and the goal of life is to recognize that all Atmans are connected and the same as the Brahman. 1 Reply 1 reply @gemaskerdeaardbei5709 @gemaskerdeaardbei5709 10 months ago The Fields are strong with this one… Reply @bobinthewest8559 @bobinthewest8559 1 year ago One hour to say, “we still don’t know...” Although... what we DO know, is quite interesting. Reply 1 reply @robertm.schors-lorentz1058 @robertm.schors-lorentz1058 1 year ago Fascinating. Reply @apradhakrishna8573 @apradhakrishna8573 2 years ago Brilliant lecture. Amazing clarity. More amazing that we could able to understand the little bit of the Universe of which we are part 6 Reply @BartholomewCounty @BartholomewCounty 10 months ago If particles had a smell, what would they smell like? Reply 1 reply @andrecoleman1856 @andrecoleman1856 1 year ago Apparently there's a quantum field holding his pants up. Great seminar! Reply @rohitchat5538 @rohitchat5538 1 year ago Happy 🙏🙏 teachers day you are world teacher great wishing you happy teachers day ..I know because of your graetest vision ..why hide inside of us only one word is regard respect .you are teacher of Teachers..my good fortuner i could meet you listened you minutely .. today please have sweets sweets i like most it's teachers day please don't forget to have sweets 🙏🙏 regards Reply @user-kt5bn5xe1e @user-kt5bn5xe1e 1 month ago I mean mind boggling ❤ Reply @marescine3652 @marescine3652 1 month ago Scientists are baffled by the behavior of the particles. The real result of their research is that they have no idea what will happen next. We are currently back in the dark ages when alchemists were searching for the philosopher's stone Reply 10 replies @tiagorodrigues3730 @tiagorodrigues3730 3 years ago 35:44 "The World's shortest introduction to General Relativity". Absolute genius, Dr Tong. Congratulations. I guess it should not come as a surprise that such an important institution as the RI has such a profusion of incredible speakers, but when I watch them it still flabbergasts me. 8 Reply @huoyuhao2664 @huoyuhao2664 7 months ago (edited) 23:00 was that vaccum (nothing in it, nothingness) computer simulation made without presence of light? Light can pass in vaccum right? I have so many questions man... Who do I ask?? Can anyone please suggest the best book to learn quantum theory, field, mechanics etc Reply 1 reply @antrewt @antrewt 10 months ago The notion that reality is composed of a fundamental field that is spread everywhere and is therefore non-local, and ripples and waves, is much more ancient than you imagine. Look at the descriptions of reality in ancient Buddhist and Hindu texts. Up to this point in the talk (11 minutes) I could be listening to a scientist building a link between Quantum Physics and the insights of ancient Eastern philosophy. I think Heraclitus' cosmology is pretty comparable too. 2 Reply 1 reply @S_G_StatusWorld @S_G_StatusWorld 1 year ago CAN YOU EXPLAIN ABOUT WHAT IS THE WORLD OF QUANTUM MECHANICS AND HOW ENERGY CAME IN THIS UNIVERSE THROUGH THE QUANTUM PHYSICS . CAN WE IMAGINE QUANTUM WORLD ARE WE TOUCH ANY OBJECTS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS WHO IS THE FOUNDER OF QUANTUM PHYSICS OR MECHANICS Reply @yungsookevinhong7943 @yungsookevinhong7943 5 months ago (edited) To know that we exist, and Realisation of other is the most important part of existence, “I think therefore I am” is only a sentence half spoken, the important is that there is other in the same consciousness of common existence of sharing. Reply @Robertnight888 @Robertnight888 11 months ago Such a pity he forgot the quantum field called time Reply @squidproquo2241 @squidproquo2241 2 years ago After all those years, watching you tube channels. discussing subjects of theoretical physics, I learned something new from this lecture. Thanks for uploading it. 8 Reply 2 replies @stgeorgeist @stgeorgeist 1 year ago question is what is Real What is reality what is consciousness what does the smallest particle energy wave pass through Reply @raulgalets @raulgalets 9 months ago this guy has tom scott vibes. smart af Reply @lawerpradeep @lawerpradeep 1 year ago Perfect. Yes it's a red herring chase. May be you should start looking within. We project the virtual reality. Dark matter is energy field (kinetic) and you are the creator the potential energy. It's like sitting on a computer and trying to find the source forgetting the operator. May be you can find answer though abstract but explains the double slit experiment. What we see and perceive may not be right and could be a red herring. 🙏 Reply @innosanto @innosanto 1 year ago It is a probabilistic equation right? So does not show much since it needs to collapse when something is measured and then you know where it was , it only knows the probabilities of where it might be. Reply 1 reply @YahshuaLovesMe @YahshuaLovesMe 1 year ago after ripples, stretched across universe...// scientists are like sightseers... Reply @klajdikoci9558 @klajdikoci9558 5 years ago How did i miss such an incredible channel so far. Thank you very very much. 9 The Royal Institution Reply @onetruekeeper @onetruekeeper 15 hours ago Fields cannot remain stable enough on it's own to form complex structures found in nature. So fields are not building blocks but thoughts are. Reply @drdavekatz @drdavekatz 1 year ago The best part of his lecture is him wearing the "red thread" against the "bad eye" ))) Reply @thetruthaboutscienceandgod2017 @thetruthaboutscienceandgod2017 1 year ago Please share with other people my two brief videos. Thank you! Reply 4 replies @albertkulan6023 @albertkulan6023 1 year ago If the electrons are 10 power of -16cm and the the quark also, then how is that possible Reply 1 reply @user-in2lo4qs9b @user-in2lo4qs9b 2 months ago if a photon went through the empty space box, what would the vacuom field do? It seems as if it hunting, waiting for something to interact with. Humanistic interpretation not or not, not withstanding... Reply @aatt3209 @aatt3209 3 years ago Thank you so much for showing the computer simulation of vacuum (standard model). When I first learned of the existence of a field in a vacuum in 2008 I couldn't believe it, that's why I love physics so much. 3 Reply 1 reply @8bit_paul @8bit_paul 1 year ago 21:05 "there are no particles in our universe" - yes. Reply @fluentpiffle @fluentpiffle 1 year ago If 'science' reveals a more plausible answer that does not require a 'beginning', would it be 'scientific' to ignore it? spaceandmotion Reply @gunzmith29r @gunzmith29r 1 year ago does that field have trees or grass? 1 Reply @felipemarques2015 @felipemarques2015 1 year ago Quantum Field Theory is just a formalism, a game. The world isn't anything. Reply @wendymckay3915 @wendymckay3915 1 year ago Excellent Reply @arekkrolak6320 @arekkrolak6320 3 years ago this video is simply amazing, I wish there were more details (yeah, equations) but even from this high perspective it is wonderful to follow this train of thoughts 30 The Royal Institution Reply @easternhealingarts33 @easternhealingarts33 9 months ago String theory can be tested with M- Gold from the timetravelers of Romes Royals Reply @fsiserir @fsiserir 7 months ago How one can combine the two theories of quantum mechanics and Maxell's equations of propagation while on one hand, quantum is a discreet phenomenon and, on another hand, propagation is a continuous phenomenon?. Reply 1 reply @frederikbjerre427 @frederikbjerre427 6 months ago (edited) Could Time be the higs field. We just looked at the field of time, what time looks like? Time create matter of the others fields? Reply 1 reply @dimitrijbabitzin1898 @dimitrijbabitzin1898 1 year ago the octave has 12 notes... Nikola Tesla, to my understanding included the notion of frequency... don't take those notes or frequencies that are used in music today, because those frequencies set there, are unnatural... but they get the answers to this quantum question, when they examine the numerous harmonies between those 12 notes... Thank you and you're welcome. Reply @qf1150 @qf1150 1 year ago Is this on the table really everything? What about the antiparticles? Reply @AmasaTony81947 @AmasaTony81947 2 years ago This was fun and informative. When he identified that ten of the elements from the periodic table had been discovered “right in this room”, he sure got my attention. Ditto on his statement that J.J. Thompson’s identification of the electron was also in the same place. However he did make one mistake; he said that the designation of up quarks and down quarks was arbitrary. Not so. Each and every particle has a characteristic spin associated with it. Whether this spin is clockwise or counterclockwise is a crucial quantum law. You determine the direction of this spin by forming your hand into fist with a thumb’s up arrangement. Then lay the fist with your fingers curling in the counterclockwise direction. Your thumb will point up. Hence all up quarks spin in a counterclockwise direction. Place your curled, thumb-pointing direction in a clockwise direction. Your thumb will point down. Therefore, all down quarks will have a clockwise spin. This is a very important point. The whole assembly of an atom, for example, precludes combinations of all up quarks with identical particle spins. Cf. The Pauli exclusion principle, e.g. 14 Reply 3 replies @ericdovigi7927 @ericdovigi7927 1 year ago (edited) I have a lot of trouble with the way that fields are described. "Fluid-like substance?" How is it a substance? In what way is it fluid-like? "Fluid-like" refers to ways that particles might behave. But fields are not particles. And also, I thought that fields are not substances? I thought that was the whole point of a field? I understand that using language to describe phenomena in physics is a futile effort, but surely there's a better way to describe fields than this? 1 Reply 1 reply @common-sense99 @common-sense99 1 year ago In vedas,in the beginning of universe is shivam(that which is not).shivam is everything but nothing.then there was a vibration and creation started and material formed and this material world has 12 dimensions like length,breadth ,height ,time etc. Reply 1 reply @jeffjohnson8624 @jeffjohnson8624 1 year ago fun fact: Quantum computers are made of gold and function at 1° kelvin. Reply @sns8420 @sns8420 1 year ago Why isn't the force that is causing Space to expand (Dark Energy) considered a 5th Force Reply 3 replies @ozgipsy @ozgipsy 1 year ago That room looks like the one you see Victorian Scientists in horror movies. Reply @joshfredr7846 @joshfredr7846 3 years ago I loved every moment listening to this lecture. Thank you so much ! 13 The Royal Institution Reply @Dude-Smellmyhelmet @Dude-Smellmyhelmet 1 year ago I seriously doubt Democritus used Legos as a comparison. Reply @PhilLeith @PhilLeith 1 year ago (edited) So the first of the three responses to the new LHC haven't seen anything we'll call the "Cubs Fan" effect 🙂 I know, I know, they had a good run there for a few years. But so did the first LHC. Reply @willyolio9590 @willyolio9590 1 year ago The equation to everything is at 42:00 coincidence? I think not! 1 Reply @SameAsAnyOtherStranger @SameAsAnyOtherStranger 1 year ago Scrolling away at five minutes in. Postulation that the periodic table of elements is a way to organize nature is like organizing cars in a car lot by taking them apart and putting the different parts in different piles. This while denying the fact that how nature organizes itself through immense forces of gravity results in the constituent pieces we recognize as atoms could yet tell us what there is to know about the universe. Reply @palanthis @palanthis 1 year ago A Higgs Boson walks into a church. The priest says "Sorry, but we don't allow Higgs Boson in here. The Higgs Boson replies "But without me, you can't have mass." Reply @heebites @heebites 4 years ago This man is an interaction of fields, as am I. This was an hour of fields teaching fields about fields. 132 Reply 4 replies @sedighazimi @sedighazimi 1 year ago (edited) A very good lecture, thanks for sharing! God's words are true, men would never find the secrets of LIFE! These knowledge are by the creator and remains there. The only thing men can do is; understand the power of your creator, be thankful and enjoy the LIFE. Reply @Avenged666 @Avenged666 1 year ago So glad he spoke truthfully on the progress of String Theory. The strings never appeared & with it being untestable & unable to make predictions, it's time to shift funding & efforts to other ideas. The inner circle top boys club in the Physics Community [Goss et al], requiring String Theory devotion needs disbanding. They have forgotten rule 1. You follow the data/results. We do not live in 10 dimension Universe that String Theory requires. Reply 1 reply @fsiserir @fsiserir 1 year ago Is there a quantum field without particles?! Reply 4 replies @rolodexter @rolodexter 2 months ago That's right. In quantum field theory, the fundamental building blocks of matter are not particles, but continuous fluid-like substances known as "quantum fields". These fields exist throughout the universe, and they can be excited to create particles. For example, the electron field is a quantum field that exists throughout the universe. When the electron field is excited, it creates an electron particle. The same is true for all other particles, such as photons, protons, and neutrons. Quantum fields are a very powerful way to understand the universe. They allow us to describe the behavior of particles in a very precise way, and they can be used to explain a wide range of physical phenomena. One of the most important things about quantum fields is that they are quantized. This means that they can only have certain discrete values. This quantization is responsible for the wave-particle duality of matter, which is the idea that matter can behave like both a wave and a particle. Quantum fields are also very important in understanding the forces of nature. The electromagnetic force, the weak force, and the strong force are all mediated by quantum fields. This means that these forces are actually the result of the interaction of quantum fields. Quantum fields are a very important part of our understanding of the universe. They are a powerful way to describe the behavior of particles, and they are responsible for the forces of nature. Here are some of the key features of quantum fields: They are continuous fluid-like substances. They exist throughout the universe. They can be excited to create particles. They are quantized. They mediate the forces of nature. Quantum fields are a very complex topic, but they are also a very powerful way to understand the universe. They are a key part of our understanding of particles, forces, and the nature of reality. Reply @ashoknaganur8551 @ashoknaganur8551 1 year ago Nice information of science news Reply @stefanhensel8611 @stefanhensel8611 3 years ago One of the best physics lectures I have ever heard. 92 The Royal Institution Reply 2 replies @hibald @hibald 1 year ago 4000 years ago Babylonian astronomers could accurately predict solar eclipses happening today. According to professor Tong's way of thinking, that would prove their basic assumption that the Earth sits still in the center of the universe 😀 Reply 1 reply @osnifreitas6201 @osnifreitas6201 1 year ago Começaram com os palpites, qualquer energia recebe um nome e uma funçao baseado nos princípios newtoniano. Em energia não podemos ter conclusões baseados em situações da matéria, LÁ NÃO TÊM MATÉRIA é so energia, pense em outro princípio. Reply @davidrandell2224 @davidrandell2224 1 month ago Expanding electrons do it all. Reply @priyankagarai1468 @priyankagarai1468 1 year ago Cosmos=quantum potential (Dirac)! Life=molecular one(Dawkins)! Consciousness=memetic one (Dennet)! Reply @manutara2007 @manutara2007 2 months ago Watching these videos I realise that learning English was a good idea. 1 Reply @jasonwang3482 @jasonwang3482 2 years ago If more than one BB, then we would have parallel universes, and since the standard model was entirely developed out of math models, it should be applicable in other universes. And it would be very interesting to study interaction between parallel universes. 4 Reply @HowlingUlf @HowlingUlf 1 year ago With flailing arms for one hour, he talks about THIS stuff, and it was mesmerizing !!! Where are the medals? :D Maybe he lied for an hour straight haha? Reply @surejuju9395 @surejuju9395 5 months ago (edited) Equations don't govern the world we are in - they are used to try to describe/model the universe! Reply @frontech3271 @frontech3271 5 months ago It's Strawberry Fields, Jake. Fourth time here, he pretty much says the same thing every time. Reply @stephenbrickwood1602 @stephenbrickwood1602 4 weeks ago Amazing so much empty space in space, and in matter. We are lucky to be here, alive and thinking. And so many who cannot handle the truth, Hahaha Hahaha 😊😊😊 1 Reply @jeffjohnson8624 @jeffjohnson8624 1 year ago How did China make a Quantumly Entangled satellite? China launched that Satellite like in or 2012 or 2015 or 2017. Reply @luda_c @luda_c 3 years ago Fantastic lecture for educating interested non-scientists. THANK YOU. 9 The Royal Institution Reply @derkyarik_7298 @derkyarik_7298 5 months ago The question is not what are the building blocks. A stone near a river, can be a stone in a dog-house, or a stone in a cathedral. On newton time, many publications where done claiming he has discovered the rules of universe. Now, with QFT, the same claim. Vanity, always the same. Reply @Kyle_Warweave @Kyle_Warweave 9 months ago [We] are (part of) the first thought EVER. Why look at its creations to find out who you are instead of what you can do ? Because this is exactly what you are doing when you ask questions like "what are we made of ?" - using an ability called 'asking questions' and creating answers. And spoiling the chemistry between the two. Reply @jeffjohnson8624 @jeffjohnson8624 1 year ago How did China make a Quantumly Entangled satellite? China launched that Satellite like in or 2012 or 2015 or 2017. Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 2 weeks ago The failure to take into account the effects of velocity and the relationship between velocity and mass to produce gravity. The mass is not the only reason for gravity and if velocity is accounted for dark matter disappears. Reply @ashoknaganur8551 @ashoknaganur8551 9 months ago It gave introduction of ideas for universe Reply @adamsmwove1153 @adamsmwove1153 3 years ago Thank God my curiosity has taken me to the depths of particles and antiparticles. I was flowing along as you fine tuned my obsession with the universe,a glimpse of its core.Marvellously sweet. 3 Reply @johnstrawb3521 @johnstrawb3521 9 months ago The idea that people will be 'terrified' by equations is obscene. Given his books popularizing relativity, Einstein would have slapped your face. Reply @yoshikhurazi1769 @yoshikhurazi1769 10 months ago Not sure if he is simplifying for the sake of the audience but his statement around 40:00 is just flat out wrong. The only mass the Higgs Field is responsible for are the individual masses of subatomic particles but these are negligible compared to the mass of composite particles like protons and neutrons. In reality, the vast majority of mass in the world is the result of energy bound with the strong nuclear force. Reply @commanderofkesariyaknights @commanderofkesariyaknights 1 year ago That’s what vedanta says, atma is part of paramatma, it is the ripples the that are taking shapes 1 Reply @ZohrehNavidi @ZohrehNavidi 1 year ago 22:45 am I the only one baffled by the statement of "even though the particles are not there the fields exist" ! you can not have a field consisted of nothing! the particles on which the quantum field is being projected is NECESSARY for the existence of that field!!!! why no one else is picking up on that!!!:)) Reply @danybloke1 @danybloke1 9 months ago There any updates to this? Reply @codingspace @codingspace 5 years ago Just imagine if Faraday's soul is somehow present in that room, How happy and delighted he must be feeling after watching that how far his inventions are involved. The way today's lectures are given, the hall is the same, the table is same but everything is equipped with cutting-edge technology, like laptops and projectors. The guy who gave initial lectures in this hall demonstrating his inventions, now we can't imagine today's lecture without using those inventions. The Beauty of Science & Technology 15 The Royal Institution Reply @humboldthammer @humboldthammer 1 year ago ". . . and one day, more educated people than ever before in the entire history of humanity, living freer and more abundantly than ever before, will be CONNECTED to a Shared, Worldwide Experience with near-instant communication . . . It's guaranteed to wake THAT Generation Up." -- Ben Franklin 1768 Reply @medict7 @medict7 11 months ago Congratulations!!!!! Reply @dorjiwangchuk404 @dorjiwangchuk404 7 months ago We really don't know quntum fields create particles or particles are responsible for producing fields....which one came to existence first Reply 1 reply @gman4931 @gman4931 1 year ago Great lecture, with some humour and humility... You've over complicated it, and gravity isn't the governor of the universe or creation. Its plasma, and charge, creating huge magnetic fields. Your climbing a greased pole. And why would two objects of the same one non conflicted singularity, have any reaction merging, especially when nothing can escape, Times 2. Why would there be any reaction at all. Let alone any wave that could propagate across the expanses of emptyness, and absorbing mass. Seems r Reply @stevenfenster1798 @stevenfenster1798 1 year ago So, what is the source of these fields? Reply 1 reply @robynw6307 @robynw6307 2 years ago Brilliant lecture. Learned so much. My only gripe would be that when he uses his laser to point at the screen, we don't get to see what it is he is pointing at, to reference it back to what he is saying. Maybe a split screen would be helpful in this situation. 6 Reply 1 reply @jacobonia @jacobonia 8 months ago Challenge assumptions and paradigms. Go back to the drawing board. Pursue fresh ideas. This is a wonderful starting point for students. Reply @femi__ade @femi__ade 4 months ago Quantum gravity is left as an exercise for the reader. Reply @nononsensedragon9438 @nononsensedragon9438 1 year ago (edited) Yes, there are👋👋👋 waves in the magnetic fields that make the light that we see come to life, so next time somebody waves to you, wave back...😁 Reply @marcus3502 @marcus3502 3 weeks ago To say that fields are the building blocks of the universe yet not know what tangible thing a field is made from is just silly. Reply @josephupton3601 @josephupton3601 1 year ago "True nothing" means, among other things, no fields. So there is something in the box. Reply @speculawyer @speculawyer 5 years ago Give us more David Tong! This was a great lecture (even though I disagree since I believe the world is quantized). 3 Reply The Royal Institution · 2 replies @genuinedickies99 @genuinedickies99 10 months ago this doesn't make sense. the radius of the observable universe is about 45 billion light years. but according to his calculations the radius of an event horizon for the weight of the observable universe should only be 15.7 billion light years... so it's about 1/3 the size of the observable universe not bigger than. what am I missing here? Reply 1 reply @AdamosDad @AdamosDad 1 year ago As time began, death became relevant. Reply @mohdhashir1520 @mohdhashir1520 1 year ago Wish I could be there.. Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 2 weeks ago Electric power doesn't obey principles of Newtonian physics. We can do things with electric power that seems impossible in Newtonian physics. Like transformers increasing power watts by using coils of copper wire . The only loss of current is heat going from 12 volt 40 amps to 110 v 40 amps.. An old design inverter losses 5 amps to heat for 40 amps. It is possible to get the increase in power without losing even 5 amps to heat. The current input should equal the current output but there's an increase in power. If we carefully arrange the distance between the coils and adjust the coil ratio we can reduce the loss of current to heat. This seems impossible. Reply @georgesmelki1 @georgesmelki1 1 year ago No Dr Tong! Not everyone is terrified by equations! And if they are, why should they be interested in theoretical physics?? Reply @Free7tibb @Free7tibb 2 years ago (edited) This is a breath taking insight into our amazing universe. There has been so much talk and study of the universe but without assured knowledge of who we are, why we are here, who set off all these things in motion and what is required of us. This only leads eventually to a scary despair. This is especially so when we contemplate the ultimate outcome of all that we know; 1. The big rip, 2. The big crunch or 3. The big bounce. Until then however we continue to entertain ourselves with our research into the mind blowing mysteries of it. The universe is such a huge toy. We are privileged and pleased to be able to enjoy playing with it even till ripe old age. Life on the other hand is far bigger than the universe and we can't play with it. We require more than the knowledge that science gives us, we need wisdom. Science is busy only with the palpable and observable physical phenomena, it has not derived any equations yet showing how the spiritual realm interacts with and influences the physical world. Until it does that, science will not be able to impart wisdom for life, neither can it fully understand the physical world. When God foresaw this plight of the scientist, He offered him this advise in Ecclesiastes 12:12-14: 12 And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh. 13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. 14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil There is so much yet to know of the universe but alas time is running out because Christ cometh soon. Seeing that the creator of the universe is about to bring a close to this dispensation and age, It is necessary that every scientist and indeed all humanity embrace the wisdom of salvation through faith in Jesus. What will happen to the universe eventually will not be any of our business after all. He that started it all has no problems about its future. Let's busy ourselves with what He requires of us within our little slot of time given us to live and secure eternal life for ourselves through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Jesus which He accomplished on the cross to wash away our sins with His blood. Hopefully that will be the best way to witness what will become of the universe because we will live for ever with Him to see what He will do with them. So the best wisdom for every scientist is to enroll through faith in Christ in God's eternal kingdom where you will be able to continue your research forever. 3 Reply @maxmumbai1234 @maxmumbai1234 4 months ago Gist: I hope to give you something better in the times to come! 1 Reply @annebrookes120 @annebrookes120 1 year ago Creation is made of particles, indiscernible to our eyes (Hebrews 11:3). Not until the 19th century was it discovered that all visible matter consists of invisible elements. Reply @johanneskingma @johanneskingma 1 month ago 23:00 Scence must be mistaken. That is not a vacuum. Or: redefine vacuum Reply @johnnyhoang4444 @johnnyhoang4444 1 year ago Shoutout to the people that caught his quick reference to avagados constant Reply @jhoselineyapur8027 @jhoselineyapur8027 8 months ago If I could put that "loved it" instead "I liked", I'd do! Reply @bunnihilator @bunnihilator 4 years ago Perfect. Thank you for REAL information. Really great work. 5 Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 2 weeks ago Magnetic field to electrons in the wire. The energy to mass of electrons in photoelectric molecules. Higgs field?? Reply @georgesmelki1 @georgesmelki1 1 year ago Today is the 7th of March 2022: more than five years have passed since this lecture. So one should ask: what has the LHC seen? Nothing! It's about time to give up these dreams of SUSY... Reply 1 reply @shivakumarv301 @shivakumarv301 6 months ago Does quantum mechanics assume the space to be plane like Newton's law of motions assume? Reply 1 reply @easternhealingarts33 @easternhealingarts33 9 months ago It takes a lifetime in Arayan Alignment to see it- four seasons of Illumination Reply @jeffjohnson8624 @jeffjohnson8624 1 year ago How did China make a Quantumly Entangled satellite? China launched that Satellite like in or 2012 or 2015 or 2017. 🌌 Reply @alvinkonda @alvinkonda 2 years ago Not sue why someone has to dislike this? This is one the best explanations of our universe i have ever listen to. 34 Reply 11 replies @austinekennyakunne8346 @austinekennyakunne8346 1 year ago I am so happy and grateful that now I am that's I am. 12may is my Plato- cave breakthroughs. Thanks universe.......... Reply @tonyatthebeach @tonyatthebeach 1 year ago (edited) 'Some crazy Russian guy solved one of them' How can he be crazy if he solved one of the hardest mathematical equations known to us? Is it because he was Russian and poor? Is the line between eccentricity or brilliance and craziness one of wealth and/or nationality? If by crazy you mean he was socially inept, you've probably just described every theoretical physicist....which takes us back to the first question. Reply 1 reply @arunp5987 @arunp5987 1 year ago Basically we know nothing as we still try to find out Reply @michaeljanewhite5467 @michaeljanewhite5467 9 months ago You need God's version of a C5 to get His souls' armies from one universe to another universe. Reply @romandamarchero3754 @romandamarchero3754 1 year ago I know engineering as much as possible for the man. Quantum physics I will not touch with the end of my stick Reply @carloscastanheiro2933 @carloscastanheiro2933 3 years ago One of the best lectures I've ever seen, thank you. 5 Reply @user-xt9jw4gt7o @user-xt9jw4gt7o 1 year ago Who made these blocks and who built Universe with them? Reply 6 replies @jeffjohnson8624 @jeffjohnson8624 1 year ago Please use the magnet sticks like the ones David Tong holds in this a copacitors and Electricity by OMD. to make magnetic fields that pulse. capacitors the Electrictronic component acts as a temporary dam for Electricity. to create pulses of Electricity in your PlayStation 5 and in your smartphone. And with all of those Electricity pulses in the magnet sticks. what happens to the fluid-like substances aka Quantum Particles collisions in pulses. use an adjustable resistors to add an adjustable dial to your Matter making box. just use a microwave sized box. safely. don't use it to make heavy elements such as element 115 it's why Bob Lazar's home was raided by the the FBI. he mentioned he someone tried to buy it off him. The smartphones were off at the time. so ambient computing lead to the raid of poor Bob's home & he talked about it on a YouTube video with Jeremy Corbell. So think twice if not think thrice about what you make with a matter making box. stay safe people. Don't make weapons. make a world of abundance, not a world of scarcity. 🖖🎶☮️ Reply @ManishKumar-pn2oy @ManishKumar-pn2oy 2 months ago Can someone tell me what is Z in that equation at 43:12 ? Reply 1 reply @johnquick4880 @johnquick4880 1 year ago 18:23 quantum means discrete or lump! No! quantum is an abbreviation of quantity, so the given study of any environment and the objects in that, is the study of the quantity of atoms and their nature in the hope to better predict outcomes. Reply @chulsoon56 @chulsoon56 1 month ago blackhole concept was concepted during WW II by German military surgeon. Reply @nivlakhera9 @nivlakhera9 1 year ago Excellent talk - I love his passion ❤️ 3 Reply @Room-qy6md @Room-qy6md 1 year ago I hate that I was taught simplified things first, because the things you get taught first, are the ones you remember best. Now I always remember the 'wrong' facts. :-( I thank the guys who make the curriculums - shame on you! Reply @drd1924 @drd1924 1 year ago (edited) I like how he ends a lot of his sentences with ...According to "our" theories / or According to physics....as we know it. As opposed to dictating how physics must behave as if we know everything about physics and there can be no argument. So anyhow, can't calculate the mass of one proton to less than 3% accuracy.... ....But NASA somehow can calculate the mass of Jupiter ...or a black hole light years away....I always knew that was baloney Reply 3 replies @nickharvey7 @nickharvey7 1 year ago We should go back to the inverse square law! Reply @rishabaggarwal2581 @rishabaggarwal2581 1 year ago Science is a tool to ease human lives ... But as curiosity kills the cat .We have begun to make it a liability out of curiosity .And the result is loud and clear .It is no longer making our lives easy .Rather it is now made Earth a hospital ... Reply @anusrujanvangala2358 @anusrujanvangala2358 3 months ago Me, watching at 3am when I have a surgery exam in the morning Reply @vaibhavsrivastava3288 @vaibhavsrivastava3288 4 years ago Awesome lecture. :) :) Thanks for uploading such a great lecture. 9 Reply @singularonaut @singularonaut 1 year ago Wow, Harari knows physics) Reply @easternhealingarts33 @easternhealingarts33 9 months ago Sophia- The universe is inside of you- get reflective about forces Reply @sobertillnoon @sobertillnoon 1 year ago Why aren't there three of each boson? 1 Reply @alahiri22 @alahiri22 1 year ago (edited) "So, this is NOTHING!" ... Funny, especially if you are an uneducated listener like me ... "Economics, not even that!" Another funny line :D ... "They're [neutrinos] not very sociable" ... "That was the shortest introduction to General Relativity" ... "This is a picture of Peter Higgs being found" ... "You can put it on a t-shirt" :D :D Reply @georgesheffield1580 @georgesheffield1580 4 weeks ago 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍❤ Reply @math.physics @math.physics 2 years ago As an engineer who has always been passionate about math and physics, I was intrigued by modern physics, despite neither relativity nor quantum mechanics were part of any course syllabus at my university. I studied these subjects on the side and found them really inspiring, I would go as far as to say that they gave me a novel perspective on life itself. That prompted me to create some online courses on Udemy on Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, special and General Relativity. It’s not my job of course, but I love talking about these topics while using some mathematics for “intuition”. 6 Reply 1 reply @HappyBear376 @HappyBear376 1 year ago (edited) The constant lip snacking and heavy breathing is rather distracting however a very entertaining lecture. He is infact on a par with Ian Campbell who was my favourite lecturer in Glasgow. Reply @gregmcclimonds8399 @gregmcclimonds8399 1 year ago No matter how thin you slice something it always has 2 sides... All this is so culturally bound 😩 Reply @duanemoran2868 @duanemoran2868 9 months ago (edited) This has been my philosophy fore ever that I know for certain something exists that is even smaller or bigger we have the sense to know that if to be more finite a sense outside our de mention has to record and exhibit its finding in away that is comprehensible to another receiver of sorts, so that we know; WHY? I know why, where, when, how. It’s in the mix that it reveals itself. !!!! I have the answers which I can teach and demonstrate. Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 2 weeks ago We don't use Edison generators and Tesla dynamos with inverters and transformers as inexpensive power plants because most people are grossly misinformed about power generation and power use. We don't need nuclear power plants fossil fuels power plants and wind power plants at all by because Edison generators use the field magnets to move the armature magnets and coils of copper wire and with inverters and transformers powerr dynamos to produce electricity with inverter and transformers to deliver high voltage AC power continuous peak power to the power lines without fuel or pollution. Reply @luisguilhermefontana2579 @luisguilhermefontana2579 11 months ago THANK YOU Reply @basambinsohailraja1801 @basambinsohailraja1801 2 years ago This guy is incredible, I learned mechanics from his lecture notes and they are by far the BEST lecture notes on the subject of both classical mechanics and special relativity. He's phenomenally good a lecturer!! 26 Reply 13 replies @lalira53 @lalira53 1 year ago (edited) More than2500 years ago Buddha said similar things. He was also royal... Reply @vhawk1951kl @vhawk1951kl 1 year ago What is the difference between this guff and how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Reply @proudguy @proudguy 1 year ago Everything takes so long to explain. Twenty minutes in and we are just getting started. Really, I should have started here. Reply @rendezvouswithpablo @rendezvouswithpablo 1 year ago Without the understanding of Number Pi and its real cause you will always remain in the dark. Reply @arthurriechert6473 @arthurriechert6473 1 year ago That room looks suspiciously like my Physics 101 room at UGA? Reply @karlderhammer5628 @karlderhammer5628 1 year ago That was interesting. I do have a question: does the vacuum, and all its fluctuations, exist in the area between the nucleus of an atom and the electron cloud? 4 Reply 1 reply @googleboy7 @googleboy7 1 year ago David. Here is the formula for it all....G= E(3) where E stands for Eternal, Everywhere and Everything. I think you know what G stands for. Shalom/gw Reply @darkfire3464 @darkfire3464 1 year ago He looks amazing ❤ Reply @Bananenbennie @Bananenbennie 1 year ago whats the difference with the aether that Einsetin and Tesla were talking about? 1 Reply 1 reply @danielash20 @danielash20 9 months ago Packets and the experience of finding the silence of the planetary bodies the draining fields of vacuuming the same sun we live with can always become a huge sizes or a balanced sizes requires you to thinking densities changed the colors and sizes you where Giants of the same on a galaxy that came from the same way as we see a particular galaxy meetings in the exchanges and the planetary relieving itself Reply @johnhatzopoulos9911 @johnhatzopoulos9911 11 months ago How about ether? How about the Orphic egg? Reply @ZakKohler @ZakKohler 6 years ago Thanks for this. The best quantum lecture I have seen! 3 Reply 1 reply @anthonyyoung3826 @anthonyyoung3826 1 year ago Very good speech, but your equation lacks one thing. Look within for the answer. When there is a conglomerate, there is also consciousnesses. Your equation lacks thought and free will. Humans have consciousness, so may other conglomerates. The way something in space behaves may be the same way Humans behave. A black hole may be alive. A galaxy may be alive. The universe holds the largest neuro network where everything is connected to everything, even if we don't see the connection, it is there. Reply 1 reply @rickrichter5068 @rickrichter5068 11 months ago What a beautiful desk.... Reply @Naejbert @Naejbert 3 weeks ago This lecture is relatively old. Is there an “update” from him or from someone else ? Reply @johnharding9634 @johnharding9634 1 year ago Beautiful accent and speaking voice. Reply @guntersostaric874 @guntersostaric874 10 months ago until the science will not change the conception of time, little progress will be made. Reply @christianschuster4184 @christianschuster4184 2 years ago (edited) the lector's eyes and his enthusiasm are infecting me very much! What a wonderful human being he is. Thanks a lot. 59 Reply 2 replies @barflytom3273 @barflytom3273 1 year ago great lecture. the crazy Russian guy refused the million bucks by the way. crazy indeed. Reply @danielash20 @danielash20 9 months ago Think we are in a vortex of gravity and I am thinking that we been going around a huge center all of everything and the beans that pop out northwest southweast of the ejection IS STANDING Still The bubbles of everything you are in one of trillions years in a spiraling environment where we are traveling the close to the speeds of light and the beams are literally standing still in the silence but the drawing in the matter is the actionable environment of us to see it in our lives of people that want a better understanding about how Mars lost some of its parts is a passing passage of an other surrounding the while in a spiraling environment we where touched by a universe galaxy that grind over the out skirts of the planetary relieving itself is powerful enough to make the idea's look at the flows of the world and the particals the sun firstly turn of the particals and stretched out to vacuum the process of refactoring waves heated moisture and colder reactive none heating resistivity in any capacity and it floats in the atmosphere of every planet with in gravity is distribution of drawing in the density to vacuum Reply @craigh2222 @craigh2222 1 year ago What exactly are these "fields" made of? Sounds like the old "ether" to me... Reply @rajbanerjee1975 @rajbanerjee1975 1 year ago towards down light/photons, towards up light/photons, flow of light with no question of return/reflection black Reply @science6955 @science6955 1 year ago CA$2.79 Thanks! The Royal Institution Reply @paulsuroj134 @paulsuroj134 4 years ago Thanks Ri to upload this beautiful lecture about QFT. 11 The Royal Institution Reply @cyin1519 @cyin1519 1 year ago His excitement looks beautiful Reply @0TeawhoyouYeahbunny0 @0TeawhoyouYeahbunny0 1 year ago The answer is: The Observer. Which is telling me the next force: Intention. We live like fishes, we don't know what water is. I believe every human or any living organism/bacteria, whatever is produced by those fields and has the ability to interfere with these fields. Other source said there are 48 fields. They both match description so far. Reply 1 reply @jedgould5531 @jedgould5531 1 year ago $1.99 Thanks! The Royal Institution Reply @brushbros @brushbros 8 months ago Colorful physics, subdued suit without a proper belt. Put it together for yerself. Reply @mnmohemmed @mnmohemmed 1 year ago €1.99 Thanks! The Royal Institution Reply @MSCH1954 @MSCH1954 4 years ago One of the best lectures about quantum mechanics. 3 Reply @marioal.penamuniz8224 @marioal.penamuniz8224 1 year ago When you connect directly to our creators frequency you enherrit the celestial collective knowledge that impowers the developing concious and literates the human restricted status of DNA' evolutionary sequance of awareness imbeded in the DNA signature reflected in all forms of creation Reply @mujaku @mujaku 1 year ago "The universe, then, consists entirely of mind-stuff. Some of this is woven into the complex form of human minds containing imperfect representations of the mind-stuff outside of them, and of themselves also, as a mirror reflects its own image in another mirror, ad infinitum. Such an imperfect representation is called a material universe. It is a picture in man's mind of the real universe of mind-stuff." — English mathematician and philosopher William Kingdon Clifford (1845–1879) Reply @melaniestarkey7868 @melaniestarkey7868 1 year ago Thank you Reply @Ripen3 @Ripen3 9 months ago "The periodic table is a silly way to organize nature" -Guy who doesn't understand the periodic table. 1 Reply @nileshsimaria @nileshsimaria 9 months ago $1.99 Thanks! The Royal Institution Reply @michaelhey4039 @michaelhey4039 1 year ago "The fundamental building blocks of nature are fluid like substances which a spread throughout the entire universe and ripple in strange and interesting ways." - That's exactly what Walter Russell taught one hundred years ago (except in his view, there is only one substance). Walter Russell gave a very detailed description of what causes the fluid to ripple the way that it does and how all physical phenomena (including the apparent manifestation of matter) follow from this energy dynamic. In light of current trends in physics, we ought to re-visit and re-consider his published works. 3 Reply 1 reply @glennsmith7702 @glennsmith7702 1 year ago The key word in the whole video was THEORY. That settled it for me-it's all theory-not fact. Reply @hossamabdelrahman3840 @hossamabdelrahman3840 1 year ago بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ( وَلَوْ فَتَحْنَا عَلَيْهِم بَاباً مِّنَ السماء فَظَلُّواْ فِيهِ يَعْرُجُونَ لَقَالُواْ إِنَّمَا سُكِّرَتْ أَبْصَارُنَا بَلْ نَحْنُ قَوْمٌ مَّسْحُورُونَ ) صدق الله العظيم Reply @joneshank1 @joneshank1 1 year ago Your mind is the quantum field generator, creating your reality with your thoughts, Reply @paulkemp5938 @paulkemp5938 12 days ago What pratt came up with the notion no one understands maths so never show an equation? I doubt the audiance at the ri is ignorant of at least basic maths. Reply @siiva-light-siiva3722 @siiva-light-siiva3722 10 months ago (edited) @41:05 Theory of Everything (as we know it as of 2018) Reply @Quantumdemetrio @Quantumdemetrio 4 years ago being in that building alone was just a quantum leap on it's on. Just Amazing. I am with you all the way you scientist have saved my life. 3 Reply @zaroxxenon5942 @zaroxxenon5942 1 year ago (edited) the periodic table is about chemistry and not physic. It' s about chemical reaction and about electron, not about inside the nuclear. And it's perfectly made for its purpose. And a quantic field is not obligatory infinite. This guy is too much exited to be a real teacher. Reply 1 reply @bronkoku @bronkoku 1 year ago Hello, thanks for the effort. Some points: - you mentioned "start of time" ??? really? That is somehow going to help us understand? And there was time when there was no time? Or what? ... you "don't quite understand "certain" parts of the equation" ??? ..hmm, how is that than an equation? ... and, somehow, it doesn't go off of my mind: "who wants everything - will have nothing and who wants nothing will have everything" i.e. 0 and infinity are the same. Reply @bekhedda9090 @bekhedda9090 9 months ago Theres some important information that he is keeping quiet about because it not allowed by the government and thats that our mind affects the field. Our thoughts and feelings are energy and everything we experience we brought it into our life simply by our beliefs. Belief is Thought and Emotion and, our thought and Combine affects matter which is energy. They don't want you to know your power because once you do know they are done. Reply 1 reply @fredjones43 @fredjones43 9 months ago I forgot the fourth question; how old it desk in the room? Reply @colinbush6111 @colinbush6111 5 years ago (edited) I am not a physicist but I have been wondering how come the elementary particles of the same kind have the same properties as if a high precision factory had manufactured them (by the way I am an engineer). I have been time and again searching for an answer to this question. Although I cannot claim that I have done an intensive research on this topic, this is the first time I hear a lecture that, I believe, explains the enigma. Those quantum fields tied up into little bundles of energy apparently make the particles become one of the possible kinds and have the same properties within their kind. In my view, this is one of the key passages of this lecture: “There are fields that underlay everything, and what we think of it’s particles aren’t really particles at all – they’re waves of these fields tied up into little bundles of energy…. There are no particles in the world. The basic fundamental building blocks of our universe are these fluid-like substances that we call fields.” 23 Reply 4 replies @terrymaccarrone289 @terrymaccarrone289 1 year ago 120 Elements Entropy Time Expansion Atom Particle Vibrational Pulsation that creates wave and particle illusion Reply @markantrobus8782 @markantrobus8782 1 day ago Aristotle said the ancient natural philosophers described a substratum, a medium. Ether is the future. See Aither 186. F V Fernandes. Reply @Dybbouk @Dybbouk 1 year ago So all this stuff about a particle being a wave and a particle at the same time is wrong?? Reply @TruthSurge @TruthSurge 1 year ago wouldn't it be ironic if math wasn't applicable at a certain low level of granularity and thus, you could never actually describe everything with just math? You'd need something different, some other method or language? I don't know, waves or fields ... or particles... we still are what we are and atoms act like atoms no matter if they are just waves so how far could we understand and is it helpful to humans or just trivia? Reply @simewood2040 @simewood2040 1 month ago Particles. At 10 minutes, ‘Fields’. Thereafter, the Emperor has no clothes. Reply @bradstephan7886 @bradstephan7886 6 years ago Brilliant! But it left me with a question: Do magnets (i.e., ferromagnetic materials) 'produce' a magnetic field, as explained in Wikipedia, or do magnets interact with a pre-existing electromagnetic field that pervades the universe? 3 Reply 3 replies @jameelaalmazro9804 @jameelaalmazro9804 1 month ago Light upon light allah guides to his light whom he wills 😊 Reply @ParthaPratimBose @ParthaPratimBose 1 year ago Dr. Tong got everything wrong. Nature's way is to simplify. He started with classical periodic table and ends up with some sort of table which is not periodic in it's proprty, still he compared them. He can have 12 fileds and 13 forces but if he can not control them to synthesize a simple molecule and contribute in our life or realization what the classical periodic table does, then it is useless to stand before the table where great Farady lectured. Sooner he understands it is better for Royal Society. Reply 3 replies @samluismassaro @samluismassaro 2 weeks ago $2.00 Thanks! Reply @nm-com @nm-com 1 month ago a geeks idea of what a humorous lesson would be. and a room full of nerds. except for the two boys who are bored af. Reply @xinyujiao4464 @xinyujiao4464 9 months ago "The speed of the precession of the electron is dictated by this number, g, here." Reply @3D-PHASE @3D-PHASE 2 years ago Thank you for this exciting lecture! 4 Reply @jimlejajde9776 @jimlejajde9776 1 year ago The word ‘field’ implies 2 dimensions. Instead, they should be called ‘oceans’ (3 dimensional)… Reply @demonsty @demonsty 1 year ago i thought electrons were made of leptons. he left out a lotta particles they'res like 12 Reply @RichardStark060 @RichardStark060 6 years ago Well presented. Informative. Top notch. Thumbs Up High hopes for the podcast. Subscribed 19 Reply @user-zh2hx6iu4r @user-zh2hx6iu4r 7 months ago Please tell me why the quantum fluctuations are frozen during cosmic inflation. Reply 2 replies @AzaadiAaazaadi @AzaadiAaazaadi 1 month ago I see , this is how normal people work Reply @ziziroberts8041 @ziziroberts8041 1 year ago 37:21 Physicist describing the cosmic dance 🕉️☸️ Maybe Ezekiel had a vision of a black hole ⚙️ Reply @1SpudderR @1SpudderR 1 year ago Hmm? Logic tells me.... “To move forward Scientists should develop the equation that ‘Flatten’ the ‘Wave Fields’.... Relating the Compressing of 0 and 1.. Infinity and Unlimited To ‘1’ of Unlimited. That’s my take on this lecture, and, unfortunately, of course as of today the lecture appears obsoleted!? Reply @donaldtrunp574 @donaldtrunp574 5 years ago (edited) If this guy was my science teacher, i would have been a scientist now.... 274 Reply 21 replies @ChrisLongOne @ChrisLongOne 9 months ago The Charm and Strange particles are inverted in your diagram. Reply @loge10 @loge10 1 year ago "They're not very sociable, they don't interact"... hmmm... maybe it's not them - maybe it's us. 2 Reply @CGV.69 @CGV.69 3 years ago Loved this presentation. Though I am a butcher not a scientist I find this fascinating. Thank you David Tong, intelligent, interesting and funny 😊 4 Reply 3 replies @rishabaggarwal2581 @rishabaggarwal2581 1 year ago I also have a theory ...for all this ..... The universe is controlled by its Creator . There is nothing like that where it all started .... If you are seeking for it ...you are seeking to find the end of infinity ,which by definition does not exist . Reply @jamescole3524 @jamescole3524 1 year ago what i find amazing is that noone asks where this feild comes from...vibrational shockwaves from star activity...when the feild starts going crazy its being compressed...send my million bucks to my home address thank you bye bye Reply @irock6490 @irock6490 3 years ago This is absolutely the best! What a beautiful side of YouTube this is. 34 Reply @BretLeduc @BretLeduc 1 year ago $2.00 Thanks! The Royal Institution Reply The Royal Institution · 1 reply @johnoneill7947 @johnoneill7947 1 year ago (edited) One day all this will become ordinary ho-hum common knowledge, like the solar system array...unless it implies a more than mechanistic meaning. Reply @milkyshakes @milkyshakes 3 years ago Amazing lecture. I’m casually watching this and now I wish I went into quantum physics 8 Reply 3 replies @AspartameBoy @AspartameBoy 1 year ago “..we simply have no idea what we’re doing..” 🎉 Reply @rashidmaroof @rashidmaroof 9 months ago Watched all of it Reply @mybluemars @mybluemars 6 years ago This is a good video to get a basic understanding of where we are in physics in 2017! 27 Reply 6 replies @kramo1 @kramo1 2 days ago This was in 2017, right? Has anyone seen a 2023 version of this talk? is there a recommended video? Reply @rohitchat5538 @rohitchat5538 1 year ago Great Great Great..what happened of Import export?we rise by rising others only 👏🙌 most scientific loud voice ..I am not expert so I walk with faith.. and not broken so..sir David tong admit it or not not only a subject yet all..to live happy life Reply @zahoorahmed8334 @zahoorahmed8334 3 years ago Excellent very well explained complex theories and made everything understandable and got me thinking!!! 8 The Royal Institution Reply @AyushSingh-mn8ed @AyushSingh-mn8ed 8 months ago Wow wow wow 👌 Reply @xBINARYGODx @xBINARYGODx 1 year ago A) years later, and no, we are still at the game place B) the EU or America can easily afford a bigger collider, but the political will is not there, and its actually easy to argue that money is better spent on other science experiments. Reply @Shapes-of-Energy @Shapes-of-Energy 3 years ago One of my absolute favorite lectures 3 Reply @ShivamSharma-eh8vb @ShivamSharma-eh8vb 1 year ago Awsome...................thanksdoc Reply @flashbotai262 @flashbotai262 1 year ago time has no start or end...its relative to object in observation by a 3rd party such as Humans Reply @snowflake5204 @snowflake5204 1 year ago Hi, can anyone recommend lectures like these on specific topics like relativity, electromagnetism? (I am talking about the depth covered in graduate schools) 8 Reply 2 replies @guntersostaric874 @guntersostaric874 10 months ago with our thoughts we can influence thos fields Reply @YahshuaLovesMe @YahshuaLovesMe 1 year ago In the beginning, "Let there be Light"... Reply @starbros1947 @starbros1947 5 years ago 9:35 "In fact the very best theories we have in physics don't rely on particles at all... The fundamental building blocks of nature are fluid-like substances which are spread throughout the entire universe and ripple in strange and interesting ways. That's the fundamental reality in which we live." 4 Reply @rayparr1 @rayparr1 1 year ago I do not know if you are aware that there is a new periodic table since the year 2003. Reply @HistoriesPurpose @HistoriesPurpose 10 months ago The ‘fields’ sound like the modern name for the ether. Reply 1 reply @scmcg @scmcg 3 years ago David Tong is like a real-life version of the 10th Doctor. ❤️ 22 Reply 1 reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 9 months ago (edited) THANKS FOR SHORT ORDER CLARIFICATION NEVER HAD THE CLASS OR BOOK MYSELF ON QUARKS SO STUCK ON MAXWELL/FARADAY YET UNDERSTAND MY OWN LIMITED DEFINITIONS AND SPELLING Reply @Gounesh @Gounesh 6 months ago Damn, it’s been an hour already? Reply @williamspenson7868 @williamspenson7868 4 years ago (edited) Ri videos are great. I follow them on a regular basis. I just have something to say. 1) He mentioned just 1st generation of particles. There is 2nd gen. 3rd as well. He was talking about them at the very beginning of the field part. There are even much more particles, according to supersymmetry. This guy knows it well, but there are interested people watching. 2) you guys mention some names in a disrespectful way. Eg. the way Harry Cliff mentioned Paul Dirac. Even worse, the way David Tong speaks about "crazy Russian guy". That guy's name is Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman and he is foremost one of the smartest people currently living on the Earth and he solved Poincare theorem. Grigori Perelman doesn't obey the social rules and expectations, but it doesn't make him crazy. He knows and understands much more then we do and ever will. 3) Channel is really really great. 5 Reply @sikendongol4208 @sikendongol4208 9 months ago no particles only field Reply @mikemarsports @mikemarsports 1 year ago Chinese subtitles please 🙏 Reply @jessstuart7495 @jessstuart7495 6 years ago (edited) 41:18 The lecturer should mention what this equation is called. It's the action integral (functional) of the Lagrangian for all known forces. And maybe talk a little about the principle of least action, and what action is all about. For those who are interested... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_(physics) 59:36 I lean towards a 4th possibility. Underlying the field concepts are the concepts of space and time. We have framed the problem of understanding all the fundamental particles and forces in terms of the spacial and time evolution of systems of particles and forces (Lagrangian). What if space and time are emergent properties of quantum systems, that only arise due to interactions of many particles (fermions and bosons)? Does it then make sense to describe everything with fields that assume an underlying space-time? Here's an analogy... Q: What is the pressure of a single molecule in a gas? A: It's a bad question. It doesn't make sense to talk about the pressure for a single molecule. I think modern physics might be locked into a similar type of situation, and theorists have pushed the math as far as it can go. We need a paradigm-shift. A crisis in physics can be the first step, we just have to be careful about becoming so confident in our ideas, that we invent new complicated mechanisms so we don't have to reexamine our fundamental assumptions. The Ptolemaic planetary model was pretty good at predicting positions of planets in the sky, but it was completely wrong physics. 10 Reply 3 replies @hosoiarchives4858 @hosoiarchives4858 1 month ago . 16:12 Faraday, electric and magnetic fields are light medium Reply @UltimaShadrax @UltimaShadrax 1 year ago (edited) They always bring up CERN and the LHC but never bring up the Jellyman Reports... Reply @ShaunJW1 @ShaunJW1 2 years ago I come back here time and time and again to be motivated by Professor Tong 10 Reply @alexandrumardare6251 @alexandrumardare6251 1 year ago To understand the nature of reality you have to collapse the observer. Reply 1 reply @davidwalker5054 @davidwalker5054 1 year ago i once asked a professor of quantum mechanics. That if a tree falls in the woods and there's no one around to hear it fall do'es it make a sound he answers yes it makes a sound. But we can't be absolutly sure where the tree was Reply @MaghrebProductions @MaghrebProductions 4 years ago One of the best Royal Institution lectures so far! Much appreciated from Morocco. 3 Reply @sanathansatya1667 @sanathansatya1667 1 year ago Till yesterday we were made up of Atoms. From today Quantum fields. Tomorrow don't know. Reply 1 reply @randallkelley3599 @randallkelley3599 1 year ago Now I have a headache! I think my quark bumped into a muon. I feel strange and charmed at the same time...:>) Reply @chappy7358 @chappy7358 6 years ago He wasn't discounting the Russian scientist. What he meant was that Perelman was "hardcore", rigorous.. He was saying that Perelman was, "crazy good" not Crazy in the sense of insane. He was giving the guy credit for his dedication and accomplishment. 251 Reply 17 replies @Nixi-Sky @Nixi-Sky 1 year ago The computer rendering of the empty space in the box repeats itself. It’s not random. Hmmmmm Reply @robinvincent1162 @robinvincent1162 1 year ago atoms are field equations Reply @lightscameras4166 @lightscameras4166 3 years ago I need the energy and passion this guy has😀 5 Reply @TahirKhan-ez4dj @TahirKhan-ez4dj 8 months ago 👍 👍 👍 Reply @crazytom @crazytom 1 year ago Photons are smaller than electrons. Photons are 0.0008 the size of electrons. Reply 2 replies @cidb.212 @cidb.212 4 years ago "Things on the left that go 'bang' when you put them in water and things on the right that don't do much of anything at all." Why couldn't my high school physics teacher be this guy!! 17 Reply @easternhealingarts33 @easternhealingarts33 9 months ago I was in charge of the CERN of Alantis that blew up- Aphrodite Reply @sadiesays3075 @sadiesays3075 8 months ago Inaction <>0 Allaction 0.5 Allaction fractilized <(,),)(,()> Inaction fractilized <.....> Symbiosis <§> < > unstable boundaries Seeing inaction, or noaction as a force Inaction An equal and opposite force was born Allaction condensed Neutralisation from both halves made a checkerboard Fractilized inaction and fractilized Allaction <(),)(,(,),),(> Making symbiosis <§> or . (§I(1)I§) As the fractals of each part attenpt to reconnect with their friends and the inaction attempts to stop this to maintain larger patches of inaction different variations of allaction fractilized and inaction created different expressions of symbiosis. Forming everything we percieve and far more and less. Apply this theory to anything you can think of It works. To much action inevitably leads to inaction Too much inaction causes allaction then instant fractilzation Sound waves, frequencies, geometry, biology, psychology. At quantum levels. This makes sense too. Reply @indikated @indikated 3 years ago (edited) One of the best lectures I ever herd in my life. 3 Reply @romandamarchero3754 @romandamarchero3754 1 year ago To talk about quonta is something that shall never happen Reply @HeatherWatson006 @HeatherWatson006 1 year ago Wow! Reply @nguttam1982 @nguttam1982 4 years ago (edited) A great speech!! I have one question though- does the quantum field theory explain 'the measurement problem' of the double slit experiment and the delayed choice eraser experiment future influencing the past observation? 8 Reply 3 replies @SolidSiren @SolidSiren 1 year ago (edited) He's talking about fields as if they are not constructs. But they are. And as if they aren't a theory. But they are. Reply 1 reply @Frankie4680 @Frankie4680 9 months ago The kids in the back were not into it 😂 Reply @fjames208 @fjames208 3 years ago So, bottom line, we are just at the beginning...so much to learn, and so much we don't know...it's amazing 3 The Royal Institution Reply 1 reply @athenacosmicdreamer198 @athenacosmicdreamer198 1 year ago Elementary particles Reply @DJRY360 @DJRY360 1 year ago "some crazy russian guy solved one of them..." yeah he was so crazy he turned down the million dollar prize! Reply @youtubecanal @youtubecanal 2 years ago (edited) Thank you for this lesson. So, the Universe is like a big sponge with holes or like a swiss cheese. Another hint is maybe humanity is reaching the limits, borders, frontiers or capacity of it’s understanding. 4 Reply @safaechakir @safaechakir 11 months ago 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Reply @michdavidmrforfematmory4135 @michdavidmrforfematmory4135 1 year ago 10 field definition Reply @marcuscrossley1368 @marcuscrossley1368 4 years ago Absolutely brilliant talk!! 3 Reply @gunzmith29r @gunzmith29r 1 year ago can you close your eyes so tight you can see parts of the cosmos? Reply @antoninkrizanic7233 @antoninkrizanic7233 3 weeks ago Universe is conscious. 1 Reply @christianlibertarian5488 @christianlibertarian5488 5 years ago Outstanding lecture series. Faraday would be proud. 3 The Royal Institution Reply @miketoumah9241 @miketoumah9241 9 months ago your audience who came to your lecture at RI.. we are not idiots... please throw at us your Equations.. don't listen to your Communicatios experts.. we are Smart. Reply 1 reply @eliezermensah5022 @eliezermensah5022 1 year ago If we figured it out. How about demonstration. Reply @ezequielsilva7812 @ezequielsilva7812 5 years ago amazing lecture!! one of the best 5 Reply @jessejackson838 @jessejackson838 7 months ago This so called empty space isn't empty at all because through emptiness becomes space, now come and look another time to discover the literal face of time. Reply @SAM-tn8nn @SAM-tn8nn 5 months ago Great Reply @andrewhirschhorn660 @andrewhirschhorn660 2 years ago Do we all feel blessed by having ongoing access, 24/7 to this man and his brilliance? I do! 7 Reply 1 reply @ckgamingchannel8066 @ckgamingchannel8066 2 months ago (edited) Dark Matter / Dark Energy = It's the light of the past. Reply @anado7273 @anado7273 1 year ago Too bad that he can not see those micro molecules! Reply @daisukeherb @daisukeherb 4 years ago (edited) Thank you for this! This is priceless! 12 Reply @444NRG @444NRG 1 year ago Respect to Boson 🇮🇳 1 Reply @mensurcehic413 @mensurcehic413 3 weeks ago At 35:09 you use the words “force of gravity”. Please be reminded that gravity is NOT a “force”. Reply 1 reply @OzKiltman @OzKiltman 2 years ago My favourite RI lecture! 4 The Royal Institution Reply @YahshuaLovesMe @YahshuaLovesMe 1 year ago general relativity; matter and forces; combination of. Reply @culinarymaster52 @culinarymaster52 1 year ago I ALSO DON'T THINK WE WOULD BE STRETCHED OUT LIKE SPAGHETTI BECAUSE WE DONT HAVE OUR OWN LARGE AMOUNT OF GRAVITY, ALL OBJECTS PULLED INTO A BLACK HOLE HAS ITS OWN GRAVITY THAT KEEPS IT TOGETHER. THE BLACK HOLE GRAVITY WOULD PULL ON US AS A WHOLE BECAUSE WE DONT HAVE A CENTER OF GRAVITY UNLESS WHERE ON SOMETHING WITH A CENTER OF GRAVITY Reply @leelashankpal1172 @leelashankpal1172 4 years ago I am so fortunate in life I have come across his lecture 51 Reply @jsandovalman @jsandovalman 1 year ago This guy is the modern Cantinflas. There isn't a Theiry of everything! Doesn't talk about the Suppositions with Einstein. Doesn't mention Gödels incompleteness theory. I believe Dr. Donald Hoffman Reply @ntbase @ntbase 1 year ago Great lecture, but how you can say such awful things about Mendeleyev's Periodic Table. Periodic table is just a transition, middle point in understanding our existence. Without it we would not be able to move further, understand, achive or discover other theories or elements. Appologies, but I might be wrong in my assumptions. Reply @vitaliy8 @vitaliy8 2 years ago "There used to be 7 hardest problems in mathematics.. but some crazy russian solved one.." Mr. Tong surely paid his respects for the man! 33 Reply 2 replies @noimaslyone @noimaslyone 1 year ago Can anyone name some other people who believed the existence of an electron was cough-BS-cough? How about.... NICOLA TESLA? Yup, stood right here and challenged anyone to show one. Reply 1 reply @DaylightDisinfectant @DaylightDisinfectant 1 year ago Build a bigger collider. Reply 1 reply @iwastoldtherewaspie @iwastoldtherewaspie 6 years ago This video blew my mind. So brilliant 23 Reply @mrmf4712 @mrmf4712 11 months ago square root from minus g? Reply @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Is integral work with Sigma Reply @NothingMaster @NothingMaster 3 years ago It has been a true mystery to me why Quantum Field Theory is so difficult for most mathematicians to understand! 4 Reply 1 reply @jaiguruvlogs1610 @jaiguruvlogs1610 1 year ago SO WHAT ABOUT LEVEN DIMENSIONS!!?👽 Reply @lilablassblau6481 @lilablassblau6481 1 year ago 🙏💕👏🙏💕👏 Reply @UnattendedNarrative @UnattendedNarrative 3 years ago thank you, and thanks to youtube for giving us a chance to see videos like this from far away place. 25 The Royal Institution Reply @far1002 @far1002 1 year ago Ha lol so that’s how motorcycles work 🤣🤣 mass interacts with magnetic fields spinning an objects multiples it’s mass. Which gives it the ability to overpower the earths magnetic field. So on the moon the rovers wheels should weigh 4 times as much as the wheel would have to be on earth because the magnetic field is weaker. An object with a large amount of mass has a higher interaction objects like light have a low mass and that’s why light is so fast . 1 Reply @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Field with dimension Reply @semitangent @semitangent 6 years ago Interesting, I've always thought that the Up and Down quarks were called that because that's the way their isospin z component points - up for +1/2 und down for -1/2 3 Reply 8 replies @chrisjansson4540 @chrisjansson4540 10 months ago HAS THIS EVER BEEN PUT TO PERSOECTIVE....CREATION DOES EVERYTHING FROM NOTHING IN THE BEGINNING. IS PERFECT TO WHAT CREATIONS PLAN IS A COSMIC DANCE ..IS EVERYTHING BIG AND SMALL..EVERYTHING AND ALL..DOES ALL IN A BALANCE.. ALWAYS BALANCE..AND THAT MANKIND DESTROYS EVERYTHING FRO. SOMETHING. DO YOU CHALLENGE THIS? 🖖😎❤️❤️❤️❤️ Reply @raoulberret3024 @raoulberret3024 9 months ago One hour passed way too fast! Reply @cortster12 @cortster12 6 years ago (edited) Quantum mechanics makes a bit more sense when you realize everything is composed of fields. I honestly couldn't wrap my mind around it until I learned about quantum fields. I still don't understand, but I do understand just a bit better than when I thought everything was made of particles. Quantum entanglement, in particular, makes a kind of sense now. Same with superposition. Heck, even qualia (I'm not talking about consciousness or subjective synaptic experience, but the phenomena of 'experiencing' consciousness from a non-interactive, one-way viewpoint from the bottom up) makes sense if you realize how everything is composed of fields. Instead of a thing that truly exists, qualia would be more a way of thinking about the universe. As if everything, including particle interactions (especially particle interactions, which are just field expressions intermingling), is a part of the same qualia. We are the universe experiencing itself, indeed. Note: I'm not talking about bullshit mumbo-jumbo where people think consciousness can affect reality. For some reason, that's how people interpret what I am saying. No, I am saying that fields themselves are 'experiencing' (note the quotations; experiencing is just the best word I can think of, not what is actually happening) through the interaction between themselves. As in, even a rock 'experiences'. But it's only when you have a brain where an actual first-person perspective materializes that isn't just experiencing energy exchange. So when your brain thinks, "I think, therefore I am", it's only a massive coincidence that the underlining fields are actually 'experiencing'. True qualia lacks the ability to affect its experience; it's only along for the ride. 34 Reply 35 replies @AbdulWahid-jl4ut @AbdulWahid-jl4ut 7 months ago Quantum Fields are explaining Quantum Fields😂 1 Reply 1 reply @patriciablue2739 @patriciablue2739 1 year ago (edited) 31 computers can’t help. 56 LHC has found nothing Reply @jessicasudoviski8778 @jessicasudoviski8778 4 years ago love it! this quantum physics subject is the best. 3 Reply @jessejackson838 @jessejackson838 7 months ago You must consider the binding property's of here and now so then space and time are in twined together, like you. Reply @kingpetra6886 @kingpetra6886 1 year ago So what about strings. Reply @Alexandra-dd9kw @Alexandra-dd9kw 4 years ago Super accessible for the layperson. Thanks! 4 Reply @donaldclifford5763 @donaldclifford5763 1 year ago Well now it's February 2022. Five years hence. So what's new? Reply @rishabaggarwal2581 @rishabaggarwal2581 1 year ago Great Effort ... But I still want to know what is it that we are in search of ... And why rack our brains .... We have reached from classical to quantum ... At leave leave somethings for the sake of distinction ,that the Creator has .... Reply @harshavardhanhajeri1753 @harshavardhanhajeri1753 3 years ago I've watched it more than 5 times and I am still overwhelmed 31 Reply @arpisz4983 @arpisz4983 1 year ago min 22.02 : "and this is what the vacuum looks like. So what you are looking at here is a computer simulation ... a computer simulation of absolutely nothing, this is empty space ... even when the particles are taken out, the field still exists ... even when there is nothing else there, the field is constantly bubbling and fluctuating ... it's worth saying that this is a computer simulation ... so this is nothing" LOL !!! Imagine you are a computer programmer and your boss, David Tong gives you the task to simulate NOTHING. You cannot say NO, because you have a mortgage to pay, so you go ahead and write a program which shows on the screen exactly what he is showing us in this lecture. The magic phrase "computer simulation" is often used to break the audience's line of thinking. You may wonder: " It must be true because it is a computer simulation ". You may think it is a simulation of reality. Well, IT IS NOT. Computers are doing EXACTLY what you tell them to do, exactly what you write in the code. So if you tell the computer that NOTHING looks like some bubbles, the computer will show some bubbles, better or worse, depending on your programming skills. Reply @kevinmurphy65 @kevinmurphy65 1 year ago The USA could also afford it...problem is...Congress. "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain Reply @SIC66SIC66 @SIC66SIC66 6 years ago Great talk. Nothing groundbreaking, but very good explanations. 12 Reply 2 replies @sepia2008 @sepia2008 1 year ago Is this where Faraday did his experiments? British Royal institution? Reply 1 reply @rongeorge574 @rongeorge574 1 year ago we are madeup of the interaction of stable waves Reply @007lutherking @007lutherking 4 years ago 2 years since they video, what progress have we made so far in quantum field theory? 13 Reply 4 replies @rajnehra @rajnehra 10 months ago Read Vedas in India, written about 10000 years ago describe everything. Reply 1 reply @Bruno_Haible @Bruno_Haible 1 year ago 11:33 and 11:46 It's really the same desk. Reply @bobaldo2339 @bobaldo2339 4 years ago (edited) If 16 or 17 "continuous" quantum fields underlie everything, how can there be any truly "closed system", and how does this impact the laws of thermodynamics? 3 Reply 2 replies @mindripperful @mindripperful 1 year ago IM pretty sure the Vedas says something very similar maybe the bhagavad gita Reply @dermotmccorkell663 @dermotmccorkell663 1 year ago Quantum field fluctuations. What did we call it before we were told it didnt exist? Began wit an e or an a Reply @johneng2432 @johneng2432 3 years ago (edited) Mahariji University professors had given similar lectures but linked it to our consciousness being the ultimate player in all these fields enabling levitations and other siddhi powers.......Transcental Meditation is the key to be one with these fields of creation....... Amen... Namaste... Hallelujah...!!! 3 Reply @manishsony9752 @manishsony9752 1 year ago Take a pause before proposing new theory. It looks good but still lacks many things. Reply @sadhanaidu5918 @sadhanaidu5918 1 year ago My mother speaks to nature...period. Reply @HRB123 @HRB123 2 years ago “On the left side, things that go fizz when you drop them in water , on the right, things that don’t do much at all. “. I like it. 7 Reply 2 replies @subramanyas3036 @subramanyas3036 1 year ago In Hinduism that fluid is called cosmic ocean. Reply 2 replies @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Magnetic lines in water Reply @karrensusan4825 @karrensusan4825 4 years ago This was an amazing video! 4 Reply @Nostradamus_Order33 @Nostradamus_Order33 1 year ago “Electron fluid” Aether Reply @YahshuaLovesMe @YahshuaLovesMe 1 year ago (edited) space and time=gravity... Reply @chuanyunyu6701 @chuanyunyu6701 4 years ago excellent lecture 3 Reply @CJ-xk7vs @CJ-xk7vs 1 year ago Funny turn inflation into compression and it all works.... go figure Reply @aardvarkmindshank @aardvarkmindshank 1 year ago The periodic table of elephants. Reply @frankligas2249 @frankligas2249 4 years ago The solution to David Tong's problem is simple... This video has over 1.5 million views and only 20K thumbs up... yet, there are greatly more thumbs up than down. Sometimes you have a problem so difficult you build an array of supercomputers to help solve them. Sometimes you have problem so difficult, you seed intelligent life across an array of planets to parallel process solutions to the problem, and while the problem is being worked out, you try not to disturb the outcome. Thanks for the video. 4 Reply @unnikrishnannairkrishnannair. @unnikrishnannairkrishnannair. 7 months ago 1% of mass lost after fission?, of uranium Reply @SadanandaChandrashekaraiah @SadanandaChandrashekaraiah 1 year ago if we could really got those perspectives to describe those '' MAY BE'S'' the reductionist could have become the one Philosopy to describe the universe. But unfortunately the world view is bigger. Reply 1 reply @tayzonday @tayzonday 2 years ago (edited) 42:00 Those two children in the background are trying so hard to not fall asleep. They either had a long day or stayed up all night. 263 Reply 29 replies @chanpol321 @chanpol321 1 month ago constant vacuum fluctuation keys to solved environmental problems of today! Reply @jurgitaranceviene3053 @jurgitaranceviene3053 1 year ago It's Aether 😀 how Hard, how Hard... 😀😃 Reply @2Cerealbox @2Cerealbox 6 years ago "Exactly what Democritus said 2,500 years ago: it's that there are like Lego bricks from which everything in the world is constructed." I had no idea Legos were that old. 320 Reply 45 replies @juanmuniz3582 @juanmuniz3582 1 year ago there is air, right Reply @Qwerty8 @Qwerty8 6 months ago ❤❤❤ Reply @suharshapw @suharshapw 2 years ago 13:04 His expressions show how much he loves what he does! 5 Reply @canucanoe2861 @canucanoe2861 1 year ago Everything is made of nothing. Got it. 1 Reply @pandaman1677 @pandaman1677 2 weeks ago Even farther than the Ancient greeks. Reply @rickebert7548 @rickebert7548 4 years ago Around 3:40 Tong says of elements of the Periodic Table: ... 10 of which were discovered in this building ... I pause the video - there is something awesome about standing in that place physically or virtually. 36 Reply @zafarahmedbutt3899 @zafarahmedbutt3899 1 year ago From the tiniest particle in the universe to the solar system, all are moving around someone. How it is binding with each are are just by the will of God. The Qayuum, the Arabic mean, he who " hold" is in Quran for the creator. Reply @raoulberret3024 @raoulberret3024 8 months ago BRI-LLANT!!! Reply @Hello-qn5ov @Hello-qn5ov 3 years ago "When we do something wrong, we make progress" Wow ! 19 Reply 2 replies @omsingharjit @omsingharjit 1 year ago (edited) 27:27 you are wrong here . Yeah, my knowledge is nothing compared to your but here you are lying electron don't really spin it's its intrinsic property that behaves like momentum caused by any spinning charge but the noticed forced in TG experiment tells it's impossible because for such Magnetic force ( or Deflected electron "spin ") An electron have to spin faster than light which is also impossible since electron have mass (but it also a wave so wave doesn't have mass so may be possible any way QP is really weird ). There is no physical analogy to explain Quantum Spin The same spin Named falsely. Reply @kilokilos @kilokilos 1 year ago Oh boy, the religion of bumping particles, why all the complexity when nature is really simple. Reply @SMCPX @SMCPX 5 years ago Very nice history/physics talk up until the null result of the LHC. David seems to think at the heart of reality there is a continuous set of fields and places the wave-function above all consideration of any notion of the discrete nature of reality. He should read "Reality is not what it seems - the journey to quantum gravity" by Carlo Rovelli; in particular page 105 - "To view Schrodinger's wave as something real is to give it too much weight". Democritus was quoted by David briefly, but not his key insight into the discrete nature of reality! It is far more plausible that Dirac and others' view that space-time is granular at the smallest scale and that continuity is an emergent property as seen from our point of view. Zeno's paradox is solved not by summing over the infinitely small, rather by summing over a very very large number of very very small discrete units of space through time. 4 Reply 3 replies @MrSimonw58 @MrSimonw58 4 months ago 21:05 .... complete silence after that statement .... Reply @Jason-io9qb @Jason-io9qb 9 months ago Not even gonna get started, but WRONG, WRONG and close....the quantum vacuum fluctuating is the only thing that exists. The material world manifests itself from the quantum vacuum or aether as they used to call it based on probabilities of how the universe wants to be at each plank moment of time 🤷 Reply @StoneShards @StoneShards 4 years ago "We simply have NO idea what we're doing."--at 31:00...You won't often hear this admission. I admire his candor. 60 Reply 4 replies @zanbel536 @zanbel536 1 year ago QF - not the building block... it's the construction site - aether 1 Reply @frederickgivens9261 @frederickgivens9261 1 year ago 1:50 "after time started to exist" yeah you're not smart, mate. before time implies the existence of time. Reply @GCKteamKrispy @GCKteamKrispy 3 years ago Just watched Harry Cliff's lecture, then this, now i think i found the treasure of physics lectures!!! 8 The Royal Institution Reply 3 replies @tylergreenwood6552 @tylergreenwood6552 1 year ago I'll be there in like 10 1 Reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 9 months ago (edited) SO STILL AT THE COLLAOPSE POINT OF FIELD IS THE POINT WE DETECT MATTER AND IT CAN BE GRAPHED AS CONICAL BEST OBSERVATION IS 3RD HARMONIC OF MAGNETIC WAVE Reply @michaelmontero4269 @michaelmontero4269 3 years ago How I would love to stand alone behind that desk, facing an empty room just to contemplate for a few minutes the great minds that spoke there. 10 Reply @user-yc5gt2us7r @user-yc5gt2us7r 1 year ago Mass in the universe is because of Reply @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Picture is different mechanics Reply @thekinginyellow1744 @thekinginyellow1744 1 year ago 7:33 "We've never discovered anything smaller that the electron" Neutrino: "What am I? Chopped liver!?" 3 Reply @muhammedshahjahan7772 @muhammedshahjahan7772 1 year ago SIR, What is the Color of an Electron sir? Reply 1 reply @cvan7681 @cvan7681 10 months ago He can talk about Quantum fields as though he actually knows something, but it's conjecture. Science never explains anything, it only describes it as seen through human perceptions... Reply 1 reply @infidelcastro5129 @infidelcastro5129 4 years ago That desk has a 3 pin socket fitted to it. Had Faraday noticed it, he'd have saved himself a whole lot of time. 637 The Royal Institution Reply 17 replies @lauramaria6043 @lauramaria6043 2 months ago Nothingness is a mental construction. Nothingness nothing is. Nothing is not. Reply @michaelholloway2295 @michaelholloway2295 1 year ago So ... ah ... 2022 here. Did the LHC find something? Reply @robbedontuesday @robbedontuesday 3 years ago 2020: Coronavirus holding the humanity in isolation. But there is a whole field connecting us together. 58 Reply 10 replies @Erik_Swiger @Erik_Swiger 9 months ago Doctor Who's cousin, Professor Who Reply @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Is field with rock and materials and chemical Reply @johndoa4839 @johndoa4839 2 years ago Utterly fascinating At 42 felt like a kid in the audience 4 Reply @donnakuhl2419 @donnakuhl2419 1 year ago Atomic energy Reply @gadgetsage @gadgetsage 1 year ago It wasn't the equation that chased me off, it was the lip smacking Reply @PhilippeCarphin @PhilippeCarphin 5 years ago "Ten [elements] of which were discovered in this very building!" That's a pretty awesome boast to be able to make. 78 Reply 15 replies @arnokosterman231 @arnokosterman231 9 months ago Feilds are thentions diverentionals and there interactions😍 Feilds consists olso there own positional total conditions translated inwarts towart the potational of diverend feidbehaviejres And there is feild flow the direction a feild turns to rule its outside and outside to represent inside as a fluxuation of ineturnal and external magnetude and demands Reply @whayneantidisastablishment8474 @whayneantidisastablishment8474 1 year ago The universe's biggest it is little Reply @stevenvanhulle7242 @stevenvanhulle7242 4 years ago "Every equation halves the number of readers" — Stephen Hawking 107 Reply 7 replies @KuldeepSingh-sf9mh @KuldeepSingh-sf9mh 1 year ago may it be. by hindi version Reply @user-kt5bn5xe1e @user-kt5bn5xe1e 1 month ago When tomorrow? Kidding thanks ❤ Reply @dontinjectdisinfectant9919 @dontinjectdisinfectant9919 3 years ago **In all the channels that I don't understand, this is my favorite one!** 154 Reply 5 replies @benjaminjaton3597 @benjaminjaton3597 1 year ago 2022 here, has the LHC seen something? Reply @Mikey-mike @Mikey-mike 1 year ago Gravity is not quantum. Reply @CookingWithCows @CookingWithCows 6 years ago Yay, thanks to science I can now make the higgs field responsible for my mass :D 17 Reply 10 replies @sprightlyrandom1550 @sprightlyrandom1550 1 year ago 23:31 ‘I am waaaay too high rn’ 1 Reply @CelestialxPanda @CelestialxPanda 1 year ago Now someone talk about HG Wells....didnt you guys kick him out ? XD Reply @tommole1977 @tommole1977 5 years ago Astonishingly good! 4 The Royal Institution Reply @erwinengelsma5498 @erwinengelsma5498 1 year ago Something about Sherlock Holmes and the dog that did not bark? Reply @LocalMarksFishing @LocalMarksFishing 1 year ago (edited) You can literally see a guys mind melt @ the 23:30 mark. Look just beind the host. Reply @jas1049 @jas1049 3 years ago Wow. This was amazing. 3 Reply @trycryptos1243 @trycryptos1243 1 year ago Revisiting 1st May 2022. Reply @kopickiphotography6702 @kopickiphotography6702 3 weeks ago Brava Reply @averyricco3980 @averyricco3980 2 years ago It seems the more we advance the more we realize we have no idea what we are talking about. 129 Reply 15 replies @easternhealingarts33 @easternhealingarts33 9 months ago Dirca is Deo and Dio- Grand unification Reply @hussen8202 @hussen8202 1 month ago oh my god, mannn fery good Reply @logicalmusicman5081 @logicalmusicman5081 3 years ago The Field is strong with this one. 190 Reply 5 replies @dreyn7780 @dreyn7780 1 year ago You just barked at us. Reply @stephenbrickwood1602 @stephenbrickwood1602 3 weeks ago Do you think that the Chinese could create this understanding? Given that much was destroyed after the death of each Emperor for thousands of years. And foreign ideas were ignored. Reply @biswajit10 @biswajit10 2 years ago (edited) General cautions note: Spin of a quantum particle has no classical analogy whatsoever. 47 Reply 9 replies @C00chieZ @C00chieZ 1 year ago I have an idea have LHC interact with something else. Reply @MrFoolingyu @MrFoolingyu 1 year ago Yeah, right! Reply @pabrielgomez8563 @pabrielgomez8563 3 years ago Thank God that there is a Universe to even live in. 3 Reply 2 replies @kn9ioutom @kn9ioutom 1 year ago WHAT IS EXISTANCE ??? 1 Reply @A.T.Wildeman @A.T.Wildeman 2 weeks ago Quadrochrome! Reply @ArthurHau @ArthurHau 4 years ago The idea that our reality is "built" by building blocks is wrong. It is a result of our tendency to separate and classify matter(s) in order to survive as humans. We try to subdivide our continuous world into discrete objects and then we classify them into different categories. But eventually, we are starting to see that our reality is not discrete but continuous. So, the more subdivision of matter we conduct, the more continuous we find them to behave. At the same time, we believe that space-time is a continuum and our measurement of these fundamental concepts should also be continuous and yet we find that many phenomena are discrete, not continuous. What's wrong? Obviously, all matter and phenomena have both "discrete" and "continuity" properties, it depends on how we use our imagination to "separate" and "classify"! 5 Reply 2 replies @kukhokuhletsengwa5730 @kukhokuhletsengwa5730 1 year ago 20:20 how to tell a woman you're soulmates Reply @Dutchman536 @Dutchman536 1 year ago (edited) Is there any reason you should understand any problem , reality and thruth , are words that should not be invented , or should not exist , this 3 % knowledge of this cosmos , will do fine Reply @Sam-gn6og @Sam-gn6og 3 years ago I like how westerners refer to the Greeks on everything historically, forgetting that the Greeks took a lot of the knowledge from the Egyptians, Persians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Babylonians, and the Sumerians 16 Reply 4 replies @HeavenlyMe1111 @HeavenlyMe1111 8 months ago So basically.. Physics proved God 1 Reply 1 reply @Mooseman327 @Mooseman327 1 year ago "Quantum fields." Uh-huh. You mean the "etheric realm" perhaps? Reply @DaveUTechj @DaveUTechj 6 years ago To David Tong ! Maybe David Tong can clarify a question nobody has replied to. Here it is: Assuming this is right: please explain this: At the pre-big bang moment all the four forces are combined into a lawless super small point and the outcome of the big bang event is unpredictable; why were untold numbers of identical hydrogen atoms created i.e. condensed out, to fill the inflating "universe" ? Here we have a clear cause and effect case. But how can something unpredictable result in something uniform and universally complex like hydrogen atoms? Why not an outcome of a formless quantum soup of pure mass-less energy. Seems like there is a law in effect here. Cause and effect. To me the big bang and its event came from a pre-existing universe with a cause and effect predecessor! If David Tong can clarify this, I would be eternally grateful! David Moses Show less REPLY 4 Reply 11 replies @YahshuaLovesMe @YahshuaLovesMe 1 year ago strings of sound? Reply @josehermesrosarioguzman3144 @josehermesrosarioguzman3144 5 months ago He says EATHER… 😮… oh oh … what s next… FLAT EARTH…???🤔 Reply @PaulPaulPaulson @PaulPaulPaulson 5 years ago "Dolores, what do you think about the quantum fluctuation animation?" "It looks like nothing to me" 122 Reply 6 replies @fakenoobyup5492 @fakenoobyup5492 1 year ago David Tong always unable to sit still..as always! Reply @Mike-oq3or @Mike-oq3or 3 months ago The secret ingredient is nothing 1 Reply @hermanocpimentel @hermanocpimentel 4 years ago (edited) So, 2019...is it time to build a bigger machine? 10 Reply 2 replies @eddieinthebed @eddieinthebed 1 year ago Somebody needs a cough drop 1 Reply @myalteregostacy9552 @myalteregostacy9552 1 year ago Aside from there's a missing process, I'm going to mock you just for fun. Reply @ABaumstumpf @ABaumstumpf 5 years ago Science 5000 years ago: lets smash some rocks together. 3000 years ago: Smash some metals together 80 years ago: Smash some atoms together 30 years ago: Smash some particles together 10 years ago: Smash some black holes together right now: Smash some particles together harder. And it works :) 11 Reply 1 reply @Cpkeim @Cpkeim 1 year ago How is this free Reply @TheMemesofDestruction @TheMemesofDestruction 1 year ago 16:32 -- So we have some Stuff and Things? ^.^ Reply @phillipbailey70 @phillipbailey70 3 years ago Hahaha! Dad in the front row losing the will to live at 50:36 🤣🤣 (Great lecture though!) 5 Reply @jessejackson838 @jessejackson838 7 months ago You couldn't be here if you yourself wasn't as that box of empty space. Reply @docgonzales @docgonzales 2 years ago Did you know that 'it's all gone dave tong' is used in the theoretical physicist community when an experiment fails? 3 Reply 1 reply @sadhanaidu5918 @sadhanaidu5918 1 year ago And she is able to predict the eesther Reply @donnakuhl2419 @donnakuhl2419 1 year ago Just admit..the nucleus of n atom..the heart of an atom... human kind can't know..just say it...you don't know..I ask the same questions to all religions..worldwide..here is a valid question....what made something from no thing? We all know you can make some thing from some thing..so let's go way back..to the origin of some thing...what made some thing from no thing? Admit..worldwide religions and sciences have "no" answers... Reply @thesprawl2361 @thesprawl2361 3 years ago "This is what you think a field is if you're a farmer...or if you're a normal person." 😁 3 Reply @humbleopinion1499 @humbleopinion1499 1 year ago (edited) I agree with the comments here, a truly amazing lecture, but for goodness sake - can he please learn to speak without saying "arrrr" and "uummmm" once, twice or even more within so many sentences? Very distracting and unnecessary. Reply @Aristocrafied @Aristocrafied 1 year ago anyone counted the 'uh(m)' s? Reply @glenn-younger @glenn-younger 3 years ago As my field interacts with yours, I want to say.... well, you probably already got that it was "THANK YOU!" 5 Reply @sekito2125 @sekito2125 1 year ago Let’s be honest here, it’s just aether repackaged Reply @dennisrobinson1290 @dennisrobinson1290 1 year ago ignorance reins in fake science, they try to top each others ignorance~ 1 Reply @pagarevijayy @pagarevijayy 2 years ago Came here randomly, mind-blown now!!! 12 Reply @KarlStubam @KarlStubam 1 year ago Der Ursprung von Information ist noch zu wenig erforscht! Reply 1 reply @aloha204 @aloha204 7 months ago Just get GPS trackers Reply @tedgrant2 @tedgrant2 2 years ago Heads up : There might be a fifth "force" according to recent news ! 12 Reply @lewisjones2825 @lewisjones2825 1 year ago This is a question for psychiatry Reply @bretloomis8881 @bretloomis8881 9 months ago PHYYSISIST = BIG GUESSER Reply 7 replies @fuseteam @fuseteam 6 years ago "the field associated with gravity is space time itself" This make me think that "if the field associated with gravity is spacetime itself then the gravitational field is spacetime itself that would mean quantizing gravity would mean quantizing spacetime itself......if quantized gravity is the graviton then the graviton is quantized spacetime........." 3 Reply 6 replies @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- 2 months ago 👇⚡👇👌 1 Reply @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Linkage fields Reply @auramdickerson112 @auramdickerson112 2 years ago The power of sound, frequency, or word. Your name David = day+video. Day being greater light. Vid= to watch( watching has an implied consciousness as a mirror does not watch it only reflects). Your name has served you well. 3 Reply @ratiopharmsponsor14 @ratiopharmsponsor14 9 months ago (edited) I wanna hear ur podcast Reply @karlchilders4493 @karlchilders4493 2 months ago this is very interesting but I cannot listen to this man talk for an hour Reply @blitherbox7467 @blitherbox7467 4 years ago The Q from Star Trek make so much more sense now. 13 Reply @easternhealingarts33 @easternhealingarts33 9 months ago Inflation and computure modeling- use computer modeling to inspire yourself- Nepthus #54 Anannaki Reply @narayanaraokdsss4833 @narayanaraokdsss4833 1 year ago Stage don't need table Reply @ryanpowell9847 @ryanpowell9847 3 years ago 30:40 ... This guy in the background is REALLY feeling our existential dilemma 10 Reply 1 reply @legioneuropa7191 @legioneuropa7191 1 year ago And? How are the results? ;) Reply @nodevit9950 @nodevit9950 10 months ago Look at the guy in the back at 23:30 rubbing his forehead/face. I am wondering what he is thinking.... 1. Why am I here? 2. Wow my mind is blown and my reality is a lie? Made me chuckle... Reply @joshualakin1223 @joshualakin1223 3 years ago The superior beings that are simulating our existence are about to decide we know too much 19 Reply 1 reply @Brancaalice @Brancaalice 1 year ago (edited) It called ether, soft like water, strong like steel, able to hold al l galaxies. Reply @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- 4 months ago 💾🌎📻🌐 1 Reply @schecter1425 @schecter1425 6 years ago If the standard model equation can explain every experiment ever done on earth, how is it that the LHC has failed to give us anything that we'd expect from this equation? This seems to be an inconsistent point of this talk, unless I just misinterpreted something. 5 Reply 5 replies @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- 4 months ago 💾🌎📻🌐 1 Reply @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- @AISFORGODHAPPYONLYI- 4 months ago 💾🌎📻🌐 1 Reply @colen35 @colen35 6 years ago The basic question is why does the universe exist at all? Why is there something rather than nothing? 8 Reply 17 replies @ivanostellato9478 @ivanostellato9478 1 year ago if two balls or shapes that match balls touch and swyrl around each other an electron would be shed skin ball rouned rolling aorung with them but came later .. thys is anothe rmodel thatthe electron is a neutron and then the proton and negatron Reply 1 reply @damianwebzyx6613 @damianwebzyx6613 2 months ago Can’t play this video, although all others are playing Reply @impwendel @impwendel 6 years ago That damn room is more important the most countries in the world, god damn 154 Reply 10 replies @dreyn7780 @dreyn7780 1 year ago The absurdity. The out of control ego. The disrespect. The selfishness. The secrecy. Moronic humans. Reply @christianfarina3056 @christianfarina3056 4 years ago To all of you saying, "If this guy were my professor I would be a scientist", I hate to spoil it, but you probably wouldn't. If not having the right instructor stopped you from being a scientist, then you probably are not meant to be one. 5 Reply 2 replies @danmel3978 @danmel3978 5 years ago (edited) Seems really convenient, vacuum quantum fluctuations and what not. It's like making something up to complete a false equation, a hexagonal peg in a round hole. You guys are missing a huge part of understanding the nature of the cosmos but i think i'll keep it to myself and watch people talk about feilds with clumps of nothingness without cause impossibly stable and concentrated in spots of matter for some ridiculous reason rather than being dispersed evenly to nothing as it would actually be without some impossibly mysterious vaccuum fluctuations which can never be explained. And no i'm not religious. 4 Reply 5 replies @ezequielsilva7812 @ezequielsilva7812 5 years ago he did say that the equation explains every single experiment in science (40:35)!!! he meant just in physics or science in general? 3 Reply 2 replies @williamesselman3102 @williamesselman3102 2 years ago I just want to throw this out there. Scripture says that in the beginning the spirit of God hovered over the surface of the deep. So the idea fluctuating and vibrating fluids being the fundamental part of reality is actually a bit older than you said it is. 3 Reply 5 replies @romanieo @romanieo 4 years ago 4:36 lol. "Are There Any Chemists In The Audience?" Great Talk. On third listen. 5 Reply 1 reply @Sumanitu @Sumanitu 3 years ago Someone get this man a glass of water, STAT! 3 Reply @michaelcgrasso1986 @michaelcgrasso1986 3 years ago In other words physicists have denied the existence of aether... and then realized they were wrong but called it quantum field. The new High Priests... the 21st century version. 10 Reply 3 replies @APerson-xg6cu @APerson-xg6cu 4 years ago They probably named the quarks up and down because it's funny to say, "UPKWARK DOWNKWARK" 4 Reply 1 reply @sebastianalers728 @sebastianalers728 5 years ago Nice lecture! Bit too much of reductionist enthusiasm for my taste though. Why calling it "theory of everything"? It covers three of the four known fundamental forces in the universe. "Theory of almost all physical phenomena" would be more adequate... 6 Reply 2 replies @XtremeAlpha @XtremeAlpha 6 years ago There's two kids sitting in the front row! Oh I wish I knew all this at that age! 31 Reply 3 replies @ZennExile @ZennExile 5 years ago Someone apparently owes me a million dollars. 3 Reply 1 reply @Malpheron @Malpheron 6 years ago Magnets, how do they work? 21 Reply 9 replies @lukea5067 @lukea5067 4 years ago He rips the periodic table a little hard doesn't he 😅 6 Reply 6 replies @ezequielsilva7812 @ezequielsilva7812 5 years ago if space-time is the fild of gravity thas must be a particle of gravity right? 3 Reply 4 replies @marcelweber7813 @marcelweber7813 6 years ago Just one question: Where is Chuck Norris in this equation? 27 Reply 7 replies @krutznutz1215 @krutznutz1215 6 years ago Interesting 3 Reply @Bishbashboshboshbosh @Bishbashboshboshbosh 6 years ago 92 thumbs downs. What in hell is wrong with people?!!! 10 Reply 6 replies @AngeloXification @AngeloXification 4 years ago 23:49 that guy in the background looks like my dad when I give these lectures at the dinner table 26 Reply 3 replies @chemicalanthony1 @chemicalanthony1 6 years ago More equations 48 Reply 7 replies @shetanz @shetanz 4 years ago So consciousness is probably also a field that can interact with the other fields giving rise to physical matter. We would then probably experience a physical reality based on our beliefs and intentions. Neo was a prophet! :) 3 Reply @mahdighorbani6824 @mahdighorbani6824 2 years ago The only thing I am sure about is that I know nothing ... 3 Reply @happytripper02 @happytripper02 6 years ago is he a Doctor Who cosplayer ? 19 Reply 3 replies @iridium8562 @iridium8562 3 years ago it's sad how he said no government has 10 billion to spare, yet annually, the global military expenditure ranges from 1.7-1.8 trillion dollars. Fucking dissapointing isn't it? 4 Reply 1 reply @lisashackleton5049 @lisashackleton5049 2 years ago Why the extremely distressing, violent, "slashing" sound at the beginning??? What for? 3 Reply @NealeBaxter @NealeBaxter 2 years ago If the periodic table is Australia, then greetings to to all, from Livermorium 116. 11 Reply @raphaellavictoria01 @raphaellavictoria01 3 years ago "a crazy russian guy solved one", great, just slide over this, like its nothing. if he had solved it, we sure would have hear more about it. 3 Reply 5 replies @hellodavey1902 @hellodavey1902 3 years ago (edited) I think we need to start calling: 'Fermions' = 'Matter Particles' 'Bosons' = 'Energy Packets' ..stop calling both/everything 'Particles'...it reinfornces the misconceptualistion..E=mc2 ('Equals' not 'Is')(and yes, even if in turn Matter is constituted from Energy [Packets]). 3 Reply @bonob0123 @bonob0123 6 years ago (edited) 23:30 guy in background gives up, head implodes. 7 Reply 1 reply @olivercromwell9294 @olivercromwell9294 5 years ago Quantum fields is simply a term used to replace the exact same and well known medium know as aether. Nothing new here, just interchanging terms to seem like they found something new. 3 Reply 4 replies @chrisdrew1768 @chrisdrew1768 6 years ago faskinating 3 Reply @hiteshk8758 @hiteshk8758 4 years ago Ancient Hindu veda said the universe is just a vibration 3 Reply 1 reply @Amazology @Amazology 6 years ago Light hearted relief - Farticles 5 Reply @KrystelSpicerMindArkLateralThi @KrystelSpicerMindArkLateralThi 1 year ago (edited) We are comparisons, expansion & deduction as much, as tools. We're who determines any light particle emerge along anywhere to reach anywhere. We undulate hear together, forever, in a safe purpose in space, more beautiful every yesterday as history expand as does universe and everything changes beneath & including our noses. On the other hand, we have very low standards. Up there is a battering ram, of who help who are only in their reach, and who dangle in these peoples reaches. We're them, transmitted to us who we've not been a while now & now every yesterday, leashed, we're more always having been them, so more & more we think it's obvious to want to be like them like anyone? Rather let's be who to want to? One day we'll look back, and all you have been but the battering ram will be totalled. I guess, what you don't know won't hurt you. I host a rise in collective consciousness via ripple effect back of flailers, practically alone. So many of you haven't the imagination to think the deeper things to understand what anyone's telling you anymore & & we the men who draw comparisons, we're beating our heads against nothing left to know anymore. That will be a sad death. Take my work. I write fragments of truth. You like them no doubt. They look like quips for pitches. Dear me 🙇🏼‍♀️. Krystel Spicer Mind Ark FB. All I write is free. Enjoy. Reply @siiva-light-siiva3722 @siiva-light-siiva3722 10 months ago (edited) @27:20 g = 2.0023193043617 (Magnetic Moment of Electron). This number g is a particular property of electron(e). e is a 'particle' and it spins. e orbits like the earth orbits. e has an axis of spin. The axis of spin can be changed with a magnet it is when the axis of spin will slowly rotates which is called procession. The speed at which that axis of spin processes is indicated by the number g. It is a complete agreement of Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Measurements as seen nowhere else in any other branch of knowledge. Reply 1 reply @DemonetisedZone @DemonetisedZone 1 year ago (edited) I farted in bed last night and thought nothing of it but when i woke up today i realised i had shat myself....its like the wise old saying goes, life is like a box of chocolates, chocolates wot have been made out of dog dirts! 🤢 Lets see the PC brigade explain that one! 🐕‍🦺👈 Reply