Einstein's Quantum Riddle | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS Jan 4, 2023

Einstein's Quantum Riddle | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 723K subscribers Subscribe 22K Share Download Clip Save 1,742,148 views Premiered Jan 4, 2023 #NOVAPBS #quantumentanglement #einstein Join scientists as they grab light from across the universe to prove quantum entanglement is real. #NOVAPBS Official Website: https://to.pbs.org/3vqiMpg Einstein called it “spooky action at a distance,” but today quantum entanglement is poised to revolutionize technology from computers to cryptography. Physicists have gradually become convinced that the phenomenon—two subatomic particles that mirror changes in each other instantaneously over any distance—is real. But a few doubts remain. NOVA follows a ground-breaking experiment in the Canary Islands to use quasars at opposite ends of the universe to once and for all settle remaining questions. (Premiered January 9, 2019) Chapters: 00:00 Introduction 03:52 Is Quantum Entanglement Real?: Canary Islands Experiment 08:10 The Beginnings of Quantum Mechanics 15:26 Quantum Mechanics Explained by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen 22:39 Developments from Discovery of Quantum Theory 27:11 The First Quantum Entanglement Experiment 32:04 Quantum Computers Solving Real-World Problems 39:02 Loopholes of Quantum Entanglement 45:20 The Results of the Canary Islands Experiment 47:47 Quantum Entanglement in Modern Physics © 2022 WGBH Educational Foundation All rights reserved This program was produced by GBH, which is solely responsible for its content. This program is made possible by viewers like you. Support your local PBS station here: https://pbs.org/donate/ Enjoy full episodes of your favorite PBS shows anytime, anywhere with the free PBS App: https://to.pbs.org/2QbtzhR Stay up to date on the latest science discoveries, full episodes, articles, videos, and more by signing up for NOVA's newsletter here: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/newslet... FOLLOW US: NOVA YouTube: / novaonline Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NOVApbs ​ Twitter: https://twitter.com/novapbs ​ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/novapbs/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@novapbs PBS Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PBS/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/PBS/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/PBS/ YouTube: / pbs TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@pbs Shop: https://shop.pbs.org/ #einstein #quantumentanglement Chapters View all Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript NOVA PBS Official 723K subscribers Videos About 2,208 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @njhoepner @njhoepner 9 months ago The bold thinking it took to even imagine the final experiment, using quasars as filter switches...and the technological ability to then execute it. I am beyond impressed. 148 Reply 21 replies @jaybutera5069 @jaybutera5069 9 months ago Wonderful! Thanks Nova for making this amazing episode. These are some of the most difficult abstract concepts in all of science, yet somehow you made it understandable. 72 Reply 4 replies @michaeldavidfigures9842 @michaeldavidfigures9842 9 months ago (edited) I love physics and astronomy. If I had had the mind for the math it is the profession I would have chosen. Although I do not comprehend it in any way like the physicists who founded quantum mechanics or those who performed this experiment, I do have a tremendous admiration for what they have done here. IMHO I believe this proves that there is clearly more to reality than what meets the eye. Perhaps we are just now beginning to get a glimpse into the universe beyond our own. Perhaps not other universes exactly, but other realities. 121 Reply 27 replies @trangha1147 @trangha1147 5 months ago Ive watched some similar contents explaining/simplifying the concept of Quantum mechanics, and this one by far is the most easy to comprehend. Thanks Nova! 12 Reply @jodalinkus5538 @jodalinkus5538 2 months ago Fascinating to witness phenomenal work done by physicists to actually minimize spatial concepts onto a computer screen for a pellucid of a nebula dynamic. 1 Reply @thagrintch @thagrintch 7 months ago One of the best NOVA episodes ever. Being able to understand entanglement better might finally answer so many unanswered questions about our place in the cosmos. 22 Reply 6 replies @SadhuBiochemist @SadhuBiochemist 9 months ago For my thesis project, I used genomics to physically clone a mouse gene. About 1-2 years afterwards, the mouse genome was sequenced. I realized that I had wasted time cloning this gene the hard way. I don't think quantum physicists should be too upset by being told that some of their work is a waste of time. We're all on the same team. 68 Reply 11 replies @jeremyschulthess63 @jeremyschulthess63 7 months ago The main thing I remember for quantum computing is that they are VERY good at large problems that our classic computers cannot handle very well. However, they are not at all good at being a general purpose system. In many ways they are more like the off die floating point units of the i386. That said I have also read that to this point we have continually found that classic computers are able do things that we thought were only possible by quantum computers due to better algorithms. 4 Reply 2 replies @laurapope3685 @laurapope3685 4 months ago This was a super awesome watch! I can't wait for the next one! Y'all do the best timing, always when I'm bored! 2 Reply @dleriousd3429 @dleriousd3429 9 months ago I have watched tons of stuff on this as a regular person, this one is great! Well explained, interesting and just all around well put together. 26 Reply 3 replies @miracledaysband @miracledaysband 7 months ago This was great. Totally entertaining and thought-provoking. Well done. 5 Reply 1 reply @thegrahammer @thegrahammer 9 months ago Thanks to Gordon & Betty Moore and John Templeton Foundations for their major financial support for NOVA. I can't wait to show this to my kids. Absolutely fascinating watch. 28 Reply @mdshifathossen5546 @mdshifathossen5546 3 months ago (edited) Fully clear about entanglement paradox. Many thanks for this worthfull documentary. A history of quantum mechanics till a century. 1 Reply @Idellphany @Idellphany 9 months ago It always amazes me just how far we have come technologically in my life time alone, and all thanks to these men . Thank you for this great doc nova! 52 Reply 11 replies @MoAndAye @MoAndAye 7 months ago FINALLY! I do not have the education or experience or training to make formal sense of all this. But even at the lay level I have followed this conversation for some time and intuitively suggested that the issue with our struggle to understand the puzzling aspects of quantum mechanics in general, and quantum entanglement specifically, is that we are failing to properly understand the concept of space. In keeping with brilliant minds of our past, we hold an inherent bias in favor of ourselves. Where we once thought that the entire universe revolves around us, even in modern times our egos insist that space must be as we experience it. Even Einstein extending this to the concept of space/time did not completely knock us of our own pedestal. For some time I have been asking sillier versions of the contemporary thinking presented here in this documentary, such as 'Why can't entangled particles simply be adhering to an adjacent position through unobservable dimensions they create for themselves once they are observed?'...or...'Maybe space is actually so tightly folded that all particles in our universe remain adjacent via other dimensions?'...or...'Perhaps we are seeing the influence of companion particles in parallel universes placed upon the observed particles in our universe, wherein the companions in that parallel universe remain adjacent?' I began asking myself these questions when I was introduced to the double-slit experiment long ago. And as I ask myself these questions (and I have asked some of these of scientists as well but never received a reply, for which I blame them not one iota), I wonder if we are seeing quantum math and theories and predictions and experiments and confirmation all as an example of mathematical parlor tricks that reveal how this all works in our experience of space, yet have still failed to divine some more elegant and underlying truth to reality? Maybe Einstein was correct about the spookiness of all this quantum stuff, and yet he was wrong all along about space itself? In contrast, quantum physicists could be wrong in what the maths are revealing to them, but they are about to end up 100% correct about space itself and will have newer and far more effective equations? And it is because this has been where my shallow understanding has been stuck for so many years, that this documentary was found to be so utterly fascinating. For that, I thank you. 5 Reply @matthew-jy5jp @matthew-jy5jp 9 months ago I don't miss a single pbs documentary. Whether it's American experience or secrets of the dead or Nova or front line. All of pbs is incredible. And people that don't know that, I feel sorry for them. PB S has been a part of my life since I was a little kid. And a truly is the best television on television 402 Reply 53 replies @TheLochs @TheLochs 9 months ago I LOVE science and quantum physics just blows my mind. I wish I had advanced mathematical understanding to really appreciate it. 21 Reply 1 reply @jebjim9391 @jebjim9391 8 months ago That was fantastically interesting. My only issue regarding the bell test (please forgive me if I got the name of it wrong ... I'm not rewinding it to get it right) that had the 2 filters that were driven by the quasars on opposite sides of the sky. It's still a pretty limited test to avoid the affect of alternate factors. Why only 2 filters and why only 2 quasars ? Why didn't the results require a near 100% correlation to be "proven". What WERE the specific numbers involved to give credence to the test. I'm not a scientist but I feel like a few things were brushed past. What were the particulars of the scientist's theory that opposed Neil's Bohr that helped the scientists do the Bell test (again, it might be the wrong name). 5 Reply 2 replies @bhaz4012 @bhaz4012 9 months ago I can't help but imagine what it would be like to go back in time and show Einstein this video. 30 Reply 2 replies @jsnavely76 @jsnavely76 9 months ago I agree with Einstein that we don't know everything about Quantum Theory yet that makes the illogical effects of quantum entanglement make sense when we eventually figure out how it works. 8 Reply @glennkrieger @glennkrieger 7 months ago It seems this documentary was released sometime in January 2023. But, it has to be at least 5 years old. The Q-bit count for the quantum computer used in this video is 72. However, the IBM Osprey, which is IBM's newest quantum computer, has a Q-bit count of 433 and was released in 2021. As knowledge doubles approximately every 12 hours, and is shrinking as we live each day, the updated PBS documentary on this subject would be even more mind blowing. 4 Reply 2 replies @fedev.92 @fedev.92 4 months ago Thanks to Nova for this beautifull documentary ❤ Totally loved it 3 Reply @mrspaceman2764 @mrspaceman2764 5 months ago The idea that there is this probability layer at the base of reality, is pretty crazy 4 Reply @kevincronk7981 @kevincronk7981 9 months ago (edited) I would love to see a documentary or series on every unpopular opinion Einstein had during his life, since he was undoubtedly a genius and made great contributions to science, but also often is thought of as being perfect or something which isn't true (although to be fair many things he held unpopular stances on, such as entanglement, aren't completely solved so he might end up being right) 41 Reply 9 replies @guaromiami @guaromiami 9 months ago Quantum mechanics is a theory that is extremely accurate at predicting what happens without offering any explanation whatsoever as to how or why it happens. 13 Reply 2 replies @marclevine3139 @marclevine3139 2 months ago Thought when I first heard of Quantum Entanglement that it could be used, sometime in the future, like a "carrier wave" for instant communication over extreme distances. 2 Reply 1 reply @arthage6703 @arthage6703 7 months ago Has there ever been an experiment with a person who lost a limb being able to control the limb when not attach to the body?I've heard of people still feeling pain in the limb that is missing but never heard of being able to control the limb when not attached. 2 Reply 1 reply @sassulusmagnus @sassulusmagnus 5 months ago Amazing stuff. One hopes that progress in the development of quantum computing is matched by developments in the prevention of its misuse. 3 Reply @jedriley8009 @jedriley8009 8 months ago So what if the speed of light is not a physical limitation but a quantum processing limitation of the universe we live in? The last part of this episode and the holographic universe idea caused me to consider this. 2 Reply @robertm9490 @robertm9490 9 months ago I’m glad you guys made this video so that the layman could understand it. Lol. Otherwise I would have never enjoyed it this much. That was a great explanation of Quantum Entanglements. 55 Reply 1 reply @ALT-vz3jn @ALT-vz3jn 6 months ago This documentary was produced in 2018. Since then there are other experiments published that prove Quantum entanglement, it’s worth a search. Reply @corujariousa @corujariousa 9 months ago (edited) Quantum Physics is so "crazy" and complex that not even Einstein could conceive some of the currently proven theories were actually possible and correct. I am sure there are lots of gaps to be closed but that is the beauty of science... Lots to learn all the time. Reply @ericcsudduth5166 @ericcsudduth5166 9 months ago I love most all PBS programing. In my humble uneducated opinion what they are describing is the spirit realm where an alternate reality mirrors our own present reality. In that alternate space there are no restrictions of gravity, time and space but the flow of energy between negative and positive points. Reply @MilesVanlife @MilesVanlife 8 months ago (edited) Lovely video PBS. There’s one little problem with the entire experiment. The moment that you observe any of it, it snaps into reality. The mere thought of perception, you are creating what you want to see, so of course the math bears out because you observed it that way. No matter how big the device to measure, or seemingly random they are, the fact you are observing them creates the reality you seek. Which is to say Einstein wasn’t wrong, that quantum mechanics was incomplete. Bohr wasn’t right either because he and his team hadn’t fully mapped out what was going on because he couldn’t. There is no test known to test a quantifiable WITHOUT looking at the world to do it, which is precisely what has to happen. Each time you measure/observe you’ll get what you asked for, instead of what you’re trying to observe. 1 Reply 2 replies @1XX1 @1XX1 9 months ago Can we do the same experiment with the James Webb and the Hubble telescopes? Quantum "jumps" are incredibly interesting! 3 Reply @vivianwiseJUSTUS @vivianwiseJUSTUS 9 months ago (edited) Could there be power in the particle that directs their property and controls their movement? Cells in the body shows an amazing continuity and direction allowing for perfect enganglement and connection no matter how small and without substance. However, a purpose and design is necessary for the connection to occur no matter the distance apart. 4 Reply 2 replies @mannanite @mannanite 9 months ago (edited) I actually think that all things being cyclic... entanglement and observable states are still a function of time. All simultaneous observations are limited and connected or bound to time. The obvious solution to this caviat would be to use light that is bound to different time blocks to rule out any possibility of entangled synchronicity. 3 Reply 1 reply @eleventy-seven @eleventy-seven 8 months ago (edited) The correlation was in the polarization of the photons. Beautiful experiment. Using the Cosmos to unlock the cosmos is so cool 5 Reply @msd1531 @msd1531 4 months ago Quantum entanglement explained in a clear and simple way. 1 Reply @alecwilliams7111 @alecwilliams7111 9 months ago I was interested in the references to Eastern philosophy. Does the "Net of Diamonds" idea apply here. In Zen Buddhist thought, if we envision a room with a table, chair, window and door, the door is the table, and table is the window, etc, etc. With a net of diamonds, everything in the universe is a reflection of something else. Once again, NOVA proves to be one of the best--if not the best--science program on the tube. 4 Reply @cyankirkpatrick5194 @cyankirkpatrick5194 9 months ago The best thing about him every time they try to prove him wrong they prove him right. Priceless. 42 Reply 20 replies @abhijithsabu6460 @abhijithsabu6460 6 months ago This is so good. One of the best I've been on Quantum Mechanics. 1 Reply @rpkamins @rpkamins 9 months ago Awesome episode. Very well made! 20 Reply @donaldjordan8989 @donaldjordan8989 8 months ago I enjoy any kind of puzzle and watching shows such as this. With my very limited amount of education I'm about a light year behind comprehending what I just viewed. I realized they weren't saying that if a tree fell in America an exact duplicate one fell in Europe in the same manor at the same time. Someone help a layman here on this experiment they conducted and quantum entanglement in general. 3 Reply 1 reply @fohponomalama5065 @fohponomalama5065 9 months ago If anyone can utilize quantum entanglement in a communication device, we could communicate with our space probes or space travelers instantaneously even from across the entire universe. 6 Reply 8 replies @lazurm @lazurm 8 months ago If an entangled particle entered a black hole, would the entanglement to the other particle remain? If so, what does that say, theoretically, about connections between multi-universes? Reply @MORCOPOLO0817 @MORCOPOLO0817 9 months ago (edited) When Einstine was explaining his theory of planetary mass and gravity he posed the question, " Is there really such a thing as nothingness?" when asked about how space could have warped geometry around the curvature of a planet. In other words how can you warp space when it is "Nothing"? So, maybe the action is not so spooky in light of this. If space has substance like matter, then two objects so far apart are not really that isolated. Maybe quantum mechanics is the foundation of consciousness. 1 Reply @noname-fw6uv @noname-fw6uv 6 months ago Interesting how things in reality work. Maybe, quantum mechanics can explain what dark matter is or dark matter is one that has influence over particles. One conundrum after another. Reply @jerelull9629 @jerelull9629 9 months ago Astounding. Reminds me of someone , I forget who, saying:"If you think you understand Quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics." 23 Reply 10 replies @Dhahdbjdnd @Dhahdbjdnd 9 months ago Maybe the two particles are actually one particle the same particle but at different points at space/time. So when looking at one you look at the same one at different points in space/time. Our human mind cannot truly comprehend the complexity of our universe 3 Reply @garyz777 @garyz777 7 months ago I"m confused about how particles become entangled in the first place. How are two "unrelated" quasars emitting photons that are entangled? 1 Reply @NewAgeVirtuoso @NewAgeVirtuoso 9 months ago I had to watch the scientific explanations so many times to comprehend, So interesting. 3 Reply @priayief @priayief 7 months ago Wonderfully explained! 1 Reply @believeinpeace @believeinpeace 9 months ago Absolutely fascinating! I wish I understood the math, what a concept! 35 Reply 24 replies @edwardkinyanjui1286 @edwardkinyanjui1286 7 months ago The statement "If you think you understand Quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics" is often attributed to physicist Richard Feynman, who was known for his work on quantum mechanics and particle physics. The statement reflects the idea that quantum mechanics is a highly complex and counterintuitive theory that challenges our everyday understanding of how the world works. Quantum mechanics describes the behavior of particles at the subatomic level, and it includes phenomena such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and superposition, which do not have classical analogs. While scientists have developed mathematical models and experimental techniques to study quantum mechanics, many aspects of the theory are still not fully understood. In addition, new discoveries and insights in quantum mechanics continue to challenge and expand our understanding of the universe. Therefore, the statement is a reminder that even the most accomplished scientists and physicists recognize the limitations of human understanding in the face of such a complex theory. Reply @abraham990 @abraham990 8 months ago I was in a deep sleep, in a medically induced coma... for 12 days... I felt like I was one of those atoms interconnecting through with the whole universe... like I was in one spot but could be in another spot within seconds or less... it was really weird. 3 Reply 1 reply @MicahBratt @MicahBratt 9 months ago What would we do without these interesting new science videos feeding our curiosity 4 Reply 1 reply @carolmiller5713 @carolmiller5713 9 months ago (edited) Friends and I were wondering why we can "feel" if someone is looking at us when we can't even see them, like when they're behind us. I thought it was electricity but this seems more likely. 16 Reply @ronsnow2015 @ronsnow2015 8 months ago excellent video, learned a bunch, thank you for posting. 1 Reply @WoodysAR @WoodysAR 9 months ago I was the only person I knew who was talking about QPE 30 years ago in my 20's. I even put a quote about it in my first book a quote from the Book of Urantia: "there exists between all bodies a real and actual superluminal link" (I don't remember the exact quote after 30 years off the top of my head but it was referring to quantum phase entanglement. It is so nice to hear it talked about in real circles and understood. 20 Reply 17 replies @GRosa250 @GRosa250 9 months ago There’s more going on with quantum entanglement than just two particles being linked. I think we’re just scratching the surface of a whole different level of how the universe operates. 9 Reply 9 replies @normancomerford6148 @normancomerford6148 9 months ago I can't even imagine the world my grandchildren's kids will live in... technologically. 8 Reply 2 replies @Mike-uo2gg @Mike-uo2gg 9 months ago (edited) If i had a quantum computer I would look for patterns in the back ground radiation in space to see if it could be communication or used for power. 2 Reply @ericanderson4883 @ericanderson4883 9 months ago I'm confused. Isn't quantum entanglement suggesting that if one particle is viewed another particle somewhere else ( assuming different or fizzy/undefined state to begin with) all of a sudden is defined with the same qualities as the particle first viewed or measured? But in the experiment it looks like 1 calcium particle is split in two and then both travel separate ways and are measured by the random filters at the end of their travels. How is this showing 1 calcium particle changed into the other. Of course they're both going to have the same properties. They're both photons from the same calcium particle. If they were able to have located a particle in its fuzzy state somehow un-observed away from the particle you view and you view the properties of the other and if that particle has the same properties as the 1st viewed, then I say that proves spooky connections. I'm a beginner here. My thoughts might be rediculous... Keep that in mind. Or, prove that a quantum particle takes shape due to simply observing it from its fuzzy state or un-formed state. I don't see this being proved here. But I'm a beginner!!! 5 Reply 3 replies @daniellewillardsen @daniellewillardsen 8 months ago I think the results of this last experiment explain why Einstein called it "spooky", I think he waw it and knew it was "spooky". It is lovely, but a bit spooky. Reply @-FAX @-FAX 9 months ago Great episode. Glad it premiered on YouTube. 31 Reply @sangeet9100 @sangeet9100 6 months ago From what I understood of the entangled secure communications part (@ around 38 mns), a mismatch at the 2 destinations would simply imply that there was a breach/evesdropping on the way; it doesn't make it more secure. Also, a hacker could figure out a way to duplicate the exact state of the photon that was hacked OR redirect the entangled photon back to the hacker detector and send out a brand new entangled pair (which of course, would not contain the original info, but could render it harder to detect). Jamming communication would seem easier too Reply 3 replies @michaelbardwell6398 @michaelbardwell6398 9 months ago As a Stargate fan my question is this. Is this greater understanding what leads to ascension? All jokes aside. If everything is just fuzzy stuff existing as a mist until detected, does that imply that if we as a human species accept this for what it is we would become enlightened to the point that we would no longer have a physical body? Reply 1 reply @marcelinogalicia7612 @marcelinogalicia7612 8 months ago Amazing documentary it shows how everything is possible, Entanglement, many world's theories, and my favorite physicist Sean M. Carroll, breakthroughs in Quantum mechanics, I think it is true we are like Alice in wonderland, Time doesn't exist. Reply 2 replies @beldeusingh483 @beldeusingh483 7 months ago (edited) Does such entanglement mean that two particles come to exist which are mirror images of each other and perfectly mimic each other as they have perfectly the same properties? 2 Reply 1 reply @vickythaya4451 @vickythaya4451 4 months ago I wish Albert Einstein and other scientists had left some time capsules and it helps us understand this universe even better! 😍😍 Reply @neurita_norie @neurita_norie 8 months ago I didn’t understand Physics in high school, but all these talks about quantum entanglement makes me want to learn Physics at home🤔 4 Reply @steve-o5859 @steve-o5859 9 months ago If the if the particles are entangled, then the quasar light particles we observe wouldn’t need to be old at all, instead it could be instantaneous image of light as it happens. Which could mean that the one way speed of light could be instantaneous while the return speed would be what we have measured thus far? 1 Reply 2 replies @Schtuperfly @Schtuperfly 8 months ago (edited) I still think Einstien is right. My gut tells me the best analogy is not a magic trick but a pair of identical baseball pitchers throwing identical curveballs that get past the filters, unidentifiable in their corkskrew tragectory until they land matchingly in the strike zone. Reply @jessefarrar5400 @jessefarrar5400 7 months ago How hard is it to separate entangled particles and use them for instant communication between computers? Reply @elijahveilleux7415 @elijahveilleux7415 9 months ago Just personal thoughts here, I am with quantum entanglement, however, I wonder if we used the space station to study instead of taking our examples from the ground, I think they would possibly notice more being outside the atmosphere, yes we have telescopes but that doesn’t help us study the randomness of particles, and for that I think we should study up there as much as possible to be safe as possible from outside interference Reply @user-nu8lv8op1j @user-nu8lv8op1j 3 months ago My brain was blown when Dijkgraaf explained the concept of the holographic universe. Reply @thefreshest2379 @thefreshest2379 9 months ago I heard a physicist say "the entire universe is one entangled wave" which makes sense. 16 Reply 1 reply @nancyknight2293 @nancyknight2293 7 months ago What I noticed as a non-scientist is that in every case, there was a single source for both entangled entities. So they were connected, then separated (spacially). So once connected, always connected? And if quantum physics does away with space, this concept almost seems inuiitive. Now, if I could just find all the mates to the singles in my socks drawer!! Reply @andrewtaylor4664 @andrewtaylor4664 8 months ago How does quantum mechanics account for observed phenomena such as light being bent by massive objects (gravitational lensing) or the detection of gravitational waves caused by cosmic cataclysms? Reply 1 reply @scgtsaganist @scgtsaganist 7 months ago (edited) If a 'signal' or some type of communication is happening between 2 remote sources, and the medium through which this signal is unknown, it makes me wonder about a medium that has yet been discovered. Not so much like extra dimensions but simply some other 'layer' in or through space time. Is there a connection between this so called dark matter or something like it and such a still undetected layer in or through space time? Reply @bnjm8868 @bnjm8868 6 months ago (edited) I think what causes people to disbelieve it is that they continue to think that faster than light speed is not possible. Quantum entanglement reveals that it is real. But, only on the smallest of scales, which affect the smallest of particles. This research will lead to traversable quantum wormholes and the real quantum space, smaller than subatomic particles. Reply @Dogbertforpresident @Dogbertforpresident 3 months ago Trying to understand these concepts is like trying to understand magic. And it's wonderful. 1 Reply 1 reply @vidanacl6489 @vidanacl6489 9 months ago 10:40 I am no expert in Physics, but this seems like a photo full of legends. 5 Reply @mikedunn7795 @mikedunn7795 7 months ago Can follow it just so far,and then my primate brain,designed to detect a tiger hiding in the bushes,just plain breaks down. But I don't feel totally dejected,as even Einstein couldn't accept quantum effects. Fascinating program. Reply @wesleybaldwin1999 @wesleybaldwin1999 1 month ago So when entangled particles have one particle effected the change is reflected in the other particle instantly. What would happen if you changed two entangled particles differently and the exact same instance? Would the simulation crash? 1 Reply 2 replies @mikecamacho1934 @mikecamacho1934 4 weeks ago (edited) So, this suggests that these entangle particles are not communicating. But always thinking the same thing at the same time and reacting to the same thing at the same time, as not to have a need to communicate. The ultimate question then is, can we use one of these entangle particles to communicate with the other particle in a far-off location in the universe? If we can accomplish this. Then we can communicate through one particle instantly to another particle somewhere in the universe bypassing time. Contemplating "Space" without "Time" is really a paradox and incomprehensible. 1 Reply @fastscales @fastscales 4 weeks ago Has these experiments been done using not just a pair of particles, but more than two? such as 7 particles or more? Perhaps all particles, not just the pair being observed are following the results of these experiments. Reply @toddkrueger1125 @toddkrueger1125 8 months ago If quantum entanglement shows to be completely true and particles can affect particles anywhere in the universe what observed, doesn’t that mean we can design that ship to move through the universe faster than light with the destination being the only observable point for which you travel?. Given that situation, would it mean that your ship would in fact not move and a completely new ship would blink into existence at the other point in the universe that is being observed? If that is true, we could explore the universe extremely fast as the other ships can project the information in the same way in reverse. However given this quantum entanglement, doesn’t that mean that we can send information almost instantly to any point being observed and have that information being sent back almost, well instantaneously. Or am I reading this completely wrong? Reply @gnome53 @gnome53 9 months ago I would vote for quantum entanglement. But … are these researchers certain the randomness was not lost by the interaction of the quasar photons with Earth's atmosphere, or with the Milky Way's magnetic field, or …? 53 Reply 33 replies @tkskagen @tkskagen 4 months ago Watching NOVA on PBS or in class back in the early 1990s is what I miss the most. Alot of the information that "WE" are receiving now is not being filtered or regulated nowadays... How SAD! Reply @cliffstevenson5773 @cliffstevenson5773 9 months ago Typical PBS family-friendly science documentary, an excellent service. The descriptions of these difficult ideas are as fuzzy as the particles. 2 Reply @ti84satact12 @ti84satact12 4 weeks ago Could the quasars themselves have been entangled or could have become entangled such that they really were not random filters and thus the “experiment” was flawed?😊 1 Reply 3 replies @briangeisler3275 @briangeisler3275 9 months ago 43:00 (this sounds a bit farfetched) could it be possible that the quasars were created before the existence of this test for the purpose of this test that ends up taking place billions of years later? (Has this possibility been ruled out? How could that change things?) Reply 1 reply @amark350 @amark350 2 months ago In my opinion, theology, not physics, is the answer to understanding the true nature of the universe. Not that we should abandoned physics, but recognize it’s limits. Reply @halstaples2469 @halstaples2469 9 months ago Hard for me to understand, but a great presentation!!! 5 Reply 2 replies @kurtbogle2973 @kurtbogle2973 9 months ago To my understanding the observance should have no effect. How does the electron know if your observing it or not? I agree with Einstein. Quantum mechanics sounds much like statistics to me. 1 Reply 1 reply @pauljmn9135 @pauljmn9135 2 months ago When you make a mathematical wave appear as a wave of smoke you are making the concept more theatrical than it really is. Reply @upplsuckimcool16 @upplsuckimcool16 9 months ago Someone would have to explain to me why it is an electron couldn't just be moving back and fourth so fast that it appears to be a wave. When you observe it you see where it is and can only give a probability of where it may be at any moment in time. Why can't this simply mean that's it's moving sporadically at near the speed of light? The only answer I can think of would be something like "It would have to be moving faster than light for this to be true" But is that true? Reply @SadhuBiochemist @SadhuBiochemist 9 months ago Just a note for my viewing of this: 1. I thought a p orbital electron transformed into electromagnetic wave energy when it got close enough to the nucleus. 2. Cathode ray has a mixture of particles and electromagnetic waves. 3. Light may produce some particles. EM waves and particles interconvert. 1 Reply 6 replies @mykrahmaan3408 @mykrahmaan3408 5 months ago (edited) What stands between Einstein's common sense notion of reality and its realization is his own assumption that the speed of photons (c) is the ultimate speed, although his assumption that there exists a maximum velocity (speed?) must certainly be correct. As current physics does not associate unique particles for other sense perceptions than sight, his assumption of "HIDDEN VARIABLES" must be those particles responsible for perceptions of other senses with HIGHER VELOCITIES (SPEEDS?) than that of light, recognizable only when we describe the mechanism how plants grow due to so defined particles (totally unrelated to standard model or the current periodic table) interact inside the earth to compose seeds, water and fertilizers and deliver parts of bodies as food through plants developed by them (i.e. so composed seeds, water and fertilizers) to be assembled by already delivered other beings on the earth's own surface. Although most of his generally accepted and glorified "discoveries" (c as ultimate speed, time dilation, space time curvature and E = mc2) may almost certainly prove to be inaccurate, his solid stand against the spooky nature of probabilistic quantum physics would ultimately prove correct, irrespective of all experimental confirmations, the Nobel prizes and practical applicability, for the ultimate CRITERION OF PROOF OF THE ACCURACY OF ANY SYSTEM OF KNOWLEDGE is, in his own words: "that it brings order into VERWIRRENDE VIELZAHL VON SINNESEINDRÜCKE (the confusing array of sense impressions)", yet more appropriately: not just "any order", but THE ORDER THAT ENABLES PRACTICAL SATISFACTION OF THE NEEDS OF ALL BEINGS. The latter is only possoble if physics sets discovery of the above mentioned mechanism how plants grow as functions of seeds, water and fertilizers composed through particle interactions in the core of the earth as its SOLE PURPOSE, from which all other phenomena in the entire universe is derivable as resultant subfunctions for sustenance of life on this earth (and, as consequence, in the entire universe). . Reply @darkwinter6028 @darkwinter6028 9 months ago I’m wondering if the two entangled particles aren’t in fact one single object at the implementation level… 11 Reply 10 replies @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 9 months ago Normally entanglement refers to the entanglement of energy and photons in the double bonds between carbons. This energy that is supposed to not have mass but an electron emerging from the nearby halogen or transition metal says otherwise. Reply 1 reply @rossmeldrum3346 @rossmeldrum3346 9 months ago I think the universe is like the ending of the movie "Men in Black" where we're just marbles for play in a much large universe. that's why quantum entanglement is so weird, there are things going on in the larger universe effecting the outcomes. 2 Reply @JustSeis @JustSeis 2 months ago In a way, it is reassuring to have the vast majority of humanity oblivious to entanglement ! Reply @eleventy-seven @eleventy-seven 8 months ago This documentary is loaded with good intent but the viewer is encouraged to read more on the topic to get a better understanding of quantum entanglement. With quantum theory, just when you think you get it, you find out there's more to it. It's more solid then the standard modal in one way but way way less intuitive. Reply 1 reply @johnmurray3888 @johnmurray3888 1 month ago Quantum effects on two particles trillions of miles apart are not limited by our measurement of the time interval it takes for information to travel between those two particles. When an astonomer (as a relatively stationary observer) gathers light from a quasar 10 billion light-years away, those photons took 10 billion years to reach the telescope. But within the frame of reference of the photons that made that quasar-telescope-detector journey, these events happened instantaneously. In a nutshell: at light speed, time stands still. Reply @michaelccopelandsr7120 @michaelccopelandsr7120 4 months ago Time is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an entire city, with no interaction with each other until they used the subway, complain about the same time paradox unless it was effected by it? Maybe a time distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of time distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? Ti-i-i-ime, is on my side. Yes, it is Reply @judyklein3221 @judyklein3221 1 month ago This is way over my ability to understand but I still find it fascinating. 3 Reply 1 reply @techman2553 @techman2553 9 months ago The Cosmic Bell Test seems a little silly. It's a great way to make a name for yourself, but there are a thousand simpler ways to create decorrelated random noise at two different locations. You could bounce lasers through smoke particles in turbulent air in two separate rooms for example. There is no chance of a correlation in two isolated sets of air turbulence. You don't need to rent time on two telescopes with just the right weather to look at variations in star light for this. Reply 1 reply @wulphstein @wulphstein 9 months ago Maybe the randomness of particles is really the presence of spacetime around the particle. 1 Reply @kiduzi9507 @kiduzi9507 4 months ago But if the entagled particles somehow were predetermined to always be matching or opposite, you'd get the same results with the experiments. How does it prove they're entagled and communicating Reply @bnjm8868 @bnjm8868 6 months ago Couldn't the fuzzy state be because particles vibrate and have an electron cloud, for atoms, while subatomic particles have clouds of their own moving at extreme speeds. Reply @aniketphd @aniketphd 6 months ago Dr. Anton received the Nobel Prize for his research! Fabulous watching journey of a Nobel Prize winner. Reply @ect2012cool @ect2012cool 9 months ago A highly recommended episode of NOVA to view. 7 Reply @brussels13207 @brussels13207 9 months ago I have always had a problem with the “until observed” part. To me that implies some sort of intelligence is doing the observing. If you go back 10 billion years most would agree there was no “life” of any sort in the universe, thus no observing. But the universe existed and got on with evolving to what we have today. Can somebody help explain to me this apparent glitch in the reasoning? I’m NOT saying these brilliant minds are wrong, I’m just asking for an explanation. I live in Brussels and have visited the hotel where that great conference took place and seen the picture hung on the wall. A great example of a person with great wealth, Mr. Solvay, using his wealth to a great end. Reply 1 reply @binbots @binbots 7 months ago (edited) Is it possible that the particle properties of matter are just our brains way of interpreting the wave like properties of matter and energy? What if it is our brains way of bringing into focus or downsizing the amount of information we receive in order to make the universe easier to comprehend. Everything is waves until our brains interact it and the whole idea of particles is just in our heads. But because that’s the way all our brains interpret energy we all agree and therefore believe that it must me true. 2 Reply @DaRyteJuan @DaRyteJuan 8 months ago To me, the Universe still seems like a 2-D plane from the perspective of time. Everything exists in the present moment, not in the past or the future. But from a subatomic level, how does it ‘come from the past’ into the present? It’s like we’re trapped in this Universe. It can’t be escaped. It’s like a 2-D prison consisting only of a plane, but our minds synthesize it into a 4-D time-space experience. Reply @rogershipman3578 @rogershipman3578 8 months ago (edited) A person who is a combination of intellectual...scientist...theorist: An educated guesser, with a large vocabulary. Reply @showmewhyiamwrong @showmewhyiamwrong 7 months ago My current thoughts on what we perceive as the weirdness of the Quantum Level is because we are still trying to fit the proverbial "square peg in the round hole”. Our Mathematics has taken us beyond our ability to understand what it is we are trying to make sense of. We think that what is happening at the Quantum level is taking place entirely in our normal Spacetime Universe when ,in fact, what we may be perceiving is what is taking place at the “Boundary”between Our Normal Spacetime and what I calll, for want of a better name, Negative Space”. My current view is that the interaction between and 2 or more Dynamic Realities would be a constantly changing “Probabilistic Environment”where “Certainty”would not exist and hence we have “the uncertainty Principle” ruled by Probabilities. It would make perfect sense and would not be Weird at all but perfectly Natural. I don’t know where this will take me but is the path that seems to make the most sense to me to follow for now. So yes we have to give up our privileged view of Reality Reply 1 reply @diggernash1 @diggernash1 9 months ago It makes me wonder if our concept of distance is somehow distorted. 5 Reply 4 replies @edwardhuff4727 @edwardhuff4727 9 months ago Einstein did not say or try to prove entanglement was impossible. He knew about entanglement. He merely objected to the esthetics of the quantum theory, but failed to discover the better theory he believed possible, one with continuous fields over spacetime. Which has more beauty: spooky action at a distance (where "the same time" isn't even well defined, and causality is already sacrificed), or giving continuity precedence over causality? For if continuity is given while causality is to be derived, I can suppose that when the detector is misaligned at the spacetime event where the particle would be arriving, the spacetime field couldn't be continuous there, and hence the particle couldn't be emitted over at the spacetime event where emission would occur. Bell's inequality is derived assuming this sort of connection is impossible, while Einstein's continuous fields would say that continuity requires the connection. Also, the idea that the particle can't be emitted unless the detector is going to be in the correct position is no more ugly that the idea that action here causes simultaneous changes there. Not to mention that to certain moving observers, the changes there occur before the action here. 2 Reply @vinod700 @vinod700 7 months ago This is the greatest Documentary I have ever watched. Thank you. Keep doing the good work. 2 Reply 1 reply @gw2100 @gw2100 8 months ago How do you know these two particles are not the same one even though they appear to be distant? 2 Reply 1 reply @bd3470 @bd3470 8 months ago It's not that a particle isn't there until it's observed, it's that what we call a particle is just a snapshot of time of an entire universe. Think about multiverse and infinity, they can be the same and happen at the same time or they can be slightly different or completely different. I think Einstein was right, there is no direct communication between particles. There is more likely a predictable similar happening by the rule of infinity 1 Reply 2 replies @paint7771 @paint7771 7 months ago There NEEDS to be a unified theory! Reply @27dforce @27dforce 9 months ago (edited) ER=EPR!! That's how great Einstein was! Didn't know the two were related but they are so connected that he's simply a genius by accident haha 4 Reply @mistie320 @mistie320 9 months ago Is it possible that the wave function of quantum entanglement particles is the peak and trough of an extended single wave? Reply 3 replies @explorerofmind @explorerofmind 7 months ago Did they entangle the particles, or did they accidentally create the same type of particle before the particles were observed? Reply 1 reply @johnminichielli8957 @johnminichielli8957 5 months ago Perception is reality. Maybe the quantum entanglement takes place in our connected minds, and we only perceive the entanglement as reality. That would make it as real as it was in Einstein's relative universe. Reply @toms4423 @toms4423 4 months ago Isn't there a fundamental lack of direct transparency at the levels where so-called "quantum mechanics" operate the most? Just because something appears to be true doesn't mean it is, no matter how consistent the results. It should be considered that no matter how anything is executed, it is still interpreted by a person or group of persons. This is not new, but also is where the biggest challenge exists. As far as we know, when an occurrence of a certain "change" is more persistent the more likely the true source of that "change" is fundamental. This suggests that when the input is the same, and the process is the same, then shouldn't the output be the same? If there is a difference, then there is likely something else occurring - perhaps not even in our solar system (maybe our galaxy). Another point (we already know): It is normal to try to "find the answer" to any question that could be asked. However, the questions and the answers don't matter - only the journey between the two. Also, even when the "journey" to an "answer" seems to have ended, it is not likely to be final. There is always something new to learn. It is our current society that insists on answers, which is something the universe cares nothing about. Reply @markmiller6844 @markmiller6844 9 months ago What if, despite the vast distances in space and time in the Cosmic Bell experiment, randomness was still not achieved? Reply @billknowles481 @billknowles481 9 months ago (edited) My thoughts on Quantum Entanglement. One of the conceits of quantum mechanics is that one must be comfortable with the idea that there are 11 dimensions. There is a new school of thought in physics putting forth the idea that information is a fifth state of matter, right up there with solid liquid gas and plasma. They also say that information has mass. The concept is also known as "information matter". But I do not care to weigh in on that subject just now. Pun intended. But here’s a link to more info. Another word for observation is measurement. And when you measure something, you get information. In order to entangle two particles, they must first be prepared in a specific quantum state. This can be done through a variety of methods, such as using lasers or magnetic fields to manipulate the particles. Once the particles are in the desired quantum state, they can be entangled by bringing them into close proximity, allowing them to interact and become entangled. Entangled particles are in superposition until measured. But is it the measurement, or is it observation by a consciousness that ends the superposition? The scientists at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) would choose the ladder. They have conducted several (1000s maybe) of experiments showing that consciousness is most likely the trigger. A particle in superposition can be anywhere in the universe, including in any dimension, even in a box with Schrödinger‘s cat. Imagine that inside the box there is a nexus of intra-dimensional and interdimensional space. Intra-dimensional space refers to dimensions within the same universe or reality as our own. These dimensions may be hidden from our perception or experience, but they still exist within the same universe. An example of this might be a fourth spatial dimension that exists alongside the three dimensions we are familiar with, but which we cannot perceive or interact with directly. On the other hand, interdimensional space refers to dimensions that exist in separate universes or realities from our own. These dimensions may be connected to our own in some way, but they are separate and distinct from it. Send that box across the universe, back again, and down the street. It has only moved in our three dimensions. The particle is still in superposition. It can still be anywhere, including inter/intra-dimensional space. Now open that box, measure/observe that particle, and collapse the waveform. Wow! Spooky action at a distance as Einstein would say. At a “distance” or through intra-dimensional space? Perhaps the particles interact with each other one last time as their waveforms collapse and they're pulled into our three-dimensional space. So no spooky action at a distance, just interaction intra-dimensionally. So is it measurement and information creation that collapses the waveform? Or is it observation and conscious awareness that collapses it? Well since we don't really know what consciousness really is just yet, the safer bet would be to go with the "Information is Matter" school of thought. Information is fundamentally just “trace evidence” as in forensic science, or simply remnants, impressions, or effects of one thing left on another. Info has mass so it would also follow that it also has a physical existence. Mass can only be attributed to objects that occupy three-dimensional space. And perhaps that’s the mechanism that snaps those particles back into our three-dimensional part of the universe. But what if "information" is just a precursor to knowledge, and that knowledge needs a consciousness to reside within? With certainty, I can say that thoughts have no mass and that consciousness in itself is not physical. These same qualities can also be a tribute to particles in superposition, or the probability waveforms of atoms. The scientists at IONS have run experiments that show conscience thought does have an effect on quantum particles, even or vast distances. At the very heart of their hypothesis is the idea that consciousness precedes physical existence. I encourage you to visit their site for more info. www.noetic.org The experiments, the researchers did at IONS involved subjects being asked to imagine a double slit experiment that was happening somewhere remote, and then imagine a particle going through either the left or right slit. They were given audible and visual feedback throughout the experiment. They measured changes in the interference patterns and found that people who are “practiced meditators” had a profound effect on the results as compared to their control sample. Could it mean that focused thought can enter “The Box” and that consciousness can travel? Or is consciousness creating information factual or otherwise and then we’re back in the “Information is Matter” camp? Can consciousness exist in Intra/Interdimensional space independent of our universe or even our living selves? Does Consciousness always inhabit this space and we just don't know it? Does our consciousness go here after our death? Woo, now that's spooky action. In conclusion, and to wrap things up. And thank you for making it this far with me. Most of the discussions around quantum entanglement revolve around either faster-than-light communication or matter teleportation. I believe we’re missing the mark and should be exploring what this entanglement phenomenon can tell us about the underlining sub-structure of the universe. Much like the way we used X-ray crystallography to determine the structure of atoms today, maybe we could find some correlation between how the particles are initially entangled and the structure of the intra-dimensional space. This may also have something to tell us about the quantum leap effect. 3 Reply 3 replies @tobymillwood9992 @tobymillwood9992 9 months ago If the two photons are originating from the same calcium atom will they not naturally have the same properties when measured at each detector? To properly prove this wouldn't you have to show entanglement among atoms of different origins? My left and right hemispheres are entangled but originate from the same squirrel cage. Reply 1 reply @jay19chandra77 @jay19chandra77 8 months ago (edited) Amazing are the scientists of the early 20th century and the discovery of quantum mechanics and the quantum entanglement that created the fuzziness of the theory at the time, and equally amazing an experiment was created to find the truth of quantum mechanics. And equally amazing is the philosophy of the ancient sages of India who saw this through sheer logic through Advaita Vedanta or Consciousness as we know today. Is, therefore, the hard problem of Consciousness resolved? Reply @patriot0971 @patriot0971 8 months ago Quantum entanglement gives us hope that there is more knowledge to be gained, and more discoveries are ahead. 2 Reply @E_Clip @E_Clip 7 months ago As per the The Copenhagen interpretation of what an observer is, I fail to understand then how particles were created (or had any properties) in the early universe when there were no observers? 1 Reply @sandyadkins2637 @sandyadkins2637 8 months ago Yes thank you for this video I could talk about this for weeks bore people but I find this so interesting as well as many other subs love Nova I have watched since I was can remember thank you 😊🙏👍⚡️ 1 Reply @shopshop144 @shopshop144 9 months ago It would have been good to see the numbers in the result of the big test and not just being told the results. The 'test' was more or less flipping a coin that has two possible results, the results apparently were 'counted', what was the count? 3 Reply 1 reply @matthewandrews2148 @matthewandrews2148 9 months ago (edited) When entangled, the 2 entangled particles can only be mathematically described by a single wave function. Since the Copenhagen interpretation says the wave function is not made of anything real, but probability itself. when the wave function collapses (per the Copenhagen interpretation this happens instantly across the system), and since its made of probability itself. Does not violate relativity. The notion of ER=EPR says that a system of 2 black holes can become entangled, and the worm hole between them is represented on the quantum scale by entanglement and quantum teleportation with the use of negative energy. I believe adds credibility to Holography theory. and N to the 200 entangled Q-bits, could simulate every particle in the universe. Reply @lifesajoke6965 @lifesajoke6965 9 months ago If we do away with spacetime, how then do we explain gravity, and the fact that we can measure it so accurately when we think about it as being caused by mass curving the fabric of space? Reply @juddaugust @juddaugust 9 months ago Does anyone else want to hear more about Einstein's quantum fiddle? Reply @pallehansen1145 @pallehansen1145 2 months ago Somehow, that last part just seemed to me to be yet another argument for simulation theory to come out of quantum physics research 😬😅 1 Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 3 months ago I wish I could have talked to those people things would be a bit different I believe. Great job fellas and ladies, let's not leave anyone out. Thank you Reply @1yehny @1yehny 9 months ago (edited) We’ve been looking for wormholes out in space, but it’s right here w quantum mechanics. What if the normal condition is that everything is connected with everything else (ie singularity) and the Big Bang created the abnormal condition of space time, which permits connected events? Entanglement is the normal state. 6 Reply 2 replies @tkskagen @tkskagen 4 months ago I truly miss the "NOVA" Episodes that we had on PBS back in the 1980s. This information is not as "freely allowed" to the public as they were as to back to when I was in high school... Reply @JeffWusch @JeffWusch 6 months ago Time is another dimensions, that at the very small has little / no effect on behaviour of the other dimenstions at those scales. Since everything is so close together, we cannot perceive the effect of time on those scale actions Reply @imetr8r @imetr8r 2 months ago These entanglement explanations never seem to explain in adequate "lay" terms why the particles did not have predetermined qualities at there creation. For example, how does one NOT know that particle "A" has "Up" spin while particle "B" already has "Down" spin before the measurement? 2 Reply 1 reply @charliejohnston1978 @charliejohnston1978 9 months ago All of the particles and waves in the universe are inter-connected, it's called the space-time continuum, so its not all that weird. Reply @garysangiacomo8016 @garysangiacomo8016 3 months ago If the concept of space is lost or dramatically altered via quantum entanglement, I wouldn’t know where to begin. Reply @buckanderson3520 @buckanderson3520 9 months ago Quantum entanglement is true, my brain becomes entangled when thinking about the quantum. 23 Reply 1 reply @manue3l1976 @manue3l1976 7 months ago The theory that nothings real until you see it is mind blowing Reply @wizboricua2245 @wizboricua2245 7 months ago It’s amazing that they pick certain places that make no sense with weather predictions to do experiments. Someone answer that question Reply @NaturalDutchSpirit @NaturalDutchSpirit 7 months ago Can someone fact check Einsteins quote "Spooky action at a distance"? I believe that he may have said it in reference to something else (still QM though), maybe collapse of wave function. Reply 1 reply @HumanzeeTamer @HumanzeeTamer 9 months ago I wonder, in the future, if entanglement could lead to travel, getting to another planet in less than a second, considering space and time doesn't exist? Reply 1 reply @JoseVelasquez-nm5ki @JoseVelasquez-nm5ki 7 months ago Great full knowledge ❤ Reply @jmac3934 @jmac3934 9 months ago (edited) The field of consciousness is fundamental, and is the elusive space between subatomic charges collapsing the wave. 3 Reply 3 replies @jeffrowlette @jeffrowlette 3 months ago Partials do not exist until it has been observed. But even if a machine detects the partial, and measures it's location, it STILL does not exist until WE, our consciousness observes it into reality. It ALWAYS comes down to what our consciousness observes and creates. Reply @homewall744 @homewall744 9 months ago (edited) Until we see entanglement actually transmit information over a distance, we'll just have to accept that the entangled particles are created so they are always related to one another. Just the notion that two particles can be separated and then instantly communicate only between themselves no matter how far apart they are made is just faith, blinded by math and conflating entanglement with communications taking place. Reply @gregboyington4896 @gregboyington4896 8 months ago (edited) We shoved it into such a tiny corner of the cosmos, that probably no one will ever bother questioning our conclusions again. Reply @cherub3624 @cherub3624 9 months ago It really almost sounds like the way a graphics card only renders things that are being observed but the information is still there when you aren't looking. Reply @stoneysdead689 @stoneysdead689 9 months ago Here's the thing about all these quantum effects- the weirdness of it all- it doesn't matter. The sum of all of it is the reality you see around you every day- nothing has changed, cause and effect are just as valid and set in stone as always. Entanglement has no noticeable effect in the macro world where we live- and it never will. We cannot interact with a particle without influencing it- which means we cannot know if the state we then observe is caused by the entanglement or our interaction with the particle in order to view it. And the instant we interact with either particle- they're no longer entangled; we broke the entanglement- before we could even observe it. So, we're never going to use it to encode information or anything like that. And as for the observer effect everyone points to- it's severely misunderstood. It doesn't require consciousness- that's not what "observation" or "measurement" means in this context- it just means physical interaction with another particle. And since one particle can and will interact with another whether humans are around or not- it means consciousness has zero to do with reality existing- it existed long before consciousness. There were no human brains around to assign meaning or order to it but, it was there, unfolding- without us. In fact, it gave rise to us- not the other way around. We're the universes attempt to understand itself. And we may well be the only consciousness in a huge sea of spacetime filled with energy condensed into various forms- if we extinguish ourselves- we may extinguish all meaning in the universe, forever. Let's hope we learn to understand one another before that happens- I cannot think of a more depressing outcome. Reply @WhiskeyNixon @WhiskeyNixon 9 months ago That guy with the chalkboard outside, at the end of the show, he was basically telling us we very well may be in the Matrix. I mean, that was my takeaway. Cool outside chalkboard, btw. 12 Reply @uturniaphobic @uturniaphobic 7 months ago I wonder if a black hole event horizon stops entanglement? Kind of sounds like it would have no effect on entangled particles at all. Reply @wulphstein @wulphstein 9 months ago Theoreticians don't always ask the best questions. So let's help them. The Casimir effect, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect, is a phenomenon in which virtual photons push against things like plates and basically everything. It's as if space or spacetime itself is pushing against us. It is vaguely like air pressure, except instead of air molecules bumping into us, it is virtual photons. But physicists have a useless and confusing way of looking at virtual photons. When a theoretician thinks of a virtual photon, it looks like a temporary vibrating string or arrow that flies in one dimension. It would never in a million years occur to the physics community that a virtual photon should be thought of as a 4D (3D +1) spherical ripple that is expanding in all directions from a point event. But let us hypothesize what would happen if the universe was being supplied by a continuous source of 4D expanding spherical ripples, no so different from the Huygen Principle, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens%E2%80%93Fresnel_principle Since we are talking about the Casimir effect, then we have to presume these 4D expanding wavefronts are carrying a small amount of momentum or pressure on their surface, so that we get back the Casimir effect. Since we added the expansion of ripples, then we can answer questions like, 1. What causes the invariance of the speed of light? Answer: the wave fronts are expanding at the speed of light. 2. What are virtual photons? Answer: virtual photons are the spherical surface area of an expanding Huygen 4D ripple, that is moving away from its center, the point of emmission, also known as the event. 3.What causes the Casimir effect? Answer: The continuous bombardment of 4D ripples (whose surface area is a virtual photon) is equivalent to a pressure (just like air pressure), because the surface area of the expanding 4D ripple carries carries a small amount of momentum. What is dark energy? Answer: dark energy is the pressure from the expansion of these 4D ripples, that begin at a point (an event), are continually supplied from the Planck scale. One day, someone will write down the integral equation for the number of expanding ripples that exist and have existed since the big bang. It will be a parameter of the number of new ripples that are created, from t=0 (the beginning of the big bang) to present day. N(t) = INT R(t)dt from t=0 to t= present. This number N(t) * the pressure of each expanding ripple, will be the total amount of dark energy. Please notice that everything I have said could be understood by an undergraduate physics student with some basic Calculus or a really smart high school student. You don't have to understand mind bending string theory and loop quantum gravity. You don't have to fill up the neurons of your brain with theories that are NOT TRUE. These concepts can be understood by a physics student or even a layperson. Ever notice that theoreticians never talk about inertial frames? We are told that inertial frames are a mathematical concept. It is as if theoreticians have never ridden in a car before traveling 80mph down a freeway, at constant speed, and then had to slam on the brakes because of a police car or a hazard in the rode. So obviously inertial frames exist physically. What causes inertial frames to exist? Answer: the location of the center of an expanding sphere defines the inertial frame. The surface area is expanding away from the center at the speed of light. The boundaries of the inertial frame are expanding with a radius R = 4 pi (ct)^2. If two expanding spheres pass each other, with one at velocity v = 0 and the other at v = v0, in such a way as to reproduce the geometry of the Pythagorean derivation of time dilation between two inertial frames, then those two expanding spheres will be a "unit of spacetime" between two inertial frames. Can superstring theory, loop quantum gravity, E8 or any current quantum gravity theory answer the questions that Expanding 4D sphere have answered so far? What causes gravity? Answer: Empty space permits the constant creation of Expanding 4D Spheres. Matter can absorb these expanding spheres. These 4D spheres are actually what wave functions are made of. And when they are absorbed by matter, then the Expanding spheres become trapped spheres. They serve as part of the wave functions of quantum system. If you have empty space on your left, and a mass M on your right, then there will be a full amount of expanding spheres pushing on you from the left (the Casimir effect). But on your right, some of the Expanding spheres have been absorbed by the matter (planet, moon, star, blackhole, etc). On your right, there will be fewer expanding spheres pushing on you. The result is that the empty space to your left will push you more then the fewer expanding spheres on your right, and you will be pushed towards the mass M. So gravity is really caused by the Casimir effect, when empty space pushes on you more than a space with a massive object. What causes time? These expanding spheres are wave functions. Wave functions have a term e^i omega t built into them. Every expanding sphere or captured sphere has a clock. There are N(t) clocks in the universe. All of these clocks together create what we know of as time. There is no time travel into the past because everything exists in the present, even if we can only see what it looks like when the light arrives after a long trip of millions of light years. If you made it this far, I want to thank you with all my heart for caring enough to hear me out. You are a champ and a rockstar! Reply @petertrebilco9430 @petertrebilco9430 4 months ago Einstein’s assumption that travelling takes time ignores the underlying assumption that there is a single consciousness, perhaps even a single reality. When I move my right hand, my left foot is affected immediately, in relation to my right hand. For example, my left foot is immediately at a different distance from my right hand. In fact, moving my right hand alters the relationship between my right hand and every other point in the universe, simultaneously. In this way, there is a ‘connection’ across space-time between every point in space-time. Any change in any point at any time alters the temporal-spatial relationship between the point and every other point in the universe. Even observing a point, rendering its probability wave as a probability of 1, instantly alters its relationship between it and every other probability of every other point. That much I get…but to observe one point and the point it affects elsewhere, requires observing two points. So, by observing one point, is there only 1 other point that is affected simultaneously? Or are all other points similarly affected by ‘spooky action’ at a distance? Reply @RichardMeikle @RichardMeikle 5 months ago That photo is like the dream team of quantum physics. Reply @houstonhammond2732 @houstonhammond2732 8 months ago Was the earth's gravitational force for each location of the experiment taken in to consideration? 1 Reply @libertyauto @libertyauto 9 months ago Wait a minute. If I am understanding this correctly, the only reason the telescopes were involved, was so they could use two different quasars as random generators to apply the filters? Surely there are earth based random generators that could have been trusted for this? I freely admit that I must be missing something. 4 Reply 5 replies @showmewhyiamwrong @showmewhyiamwrong 7 months ago If you think that what takes place at the Quantum Level is weird, Think about this: Something which has been created by the apparent Weirdness of the Quantum Reality has evolved to recognize that Weirdness, and is struggling to understand that Weirdness and utilize it to understand and perhaps some day control it. Reply @rayagoldendropofsun397 @rayagoldendropofsun397 9 months ago That experiment should've take place on the outside of the international space station where it's particle free. Reply 3 replies @Songer80 @Songer80 9 months ago How does that experiment prove spooky action at a distance? What they have to do is capture 2 entangled particles at 2 different places. Then do something to change one of the particles and see if the same thing happens to the other one. The experiment they did only proves entanglement which is an easy concept to grasp, but spooky action at a distance has not been proven. Or am I missing something? 1 Reply 4 replies @rayjasmantas9609 @rayjasmantas9609 7 months ago The logic of approaching the extraction of energy from almost noting, Albert stated that the relativity to the galaxies are based on a single force, gravity, which is well passed the speed of light distance for cooperation, but when examined up close as Earth having the same gravitation field holding it together, is not a buildup that is being so strong it is build to destroy Earth with the size of the universe's gravity unity. So these spread out activities are based on having the same abilities (the search for resonance comparison build ups), a effect on each other, that as the quantum word meaning, a search pattern development. So if able to find a control over a hold on gravity, it could be amplified as a energy, something considered being a excitement state now made to look for its inertia settlement state from being in a excited stated, or how energy is lasting! Reply 1 reply @DarwinianUniversal @DarwinianUniversal 7 months ago I'd put my money on the interaction with the polarization filters. The filter interaction's can be the cause for the anomalous correlations between the photon pairs Reply @findloveandkindness8614 @findloveandkindness8614 9 months ago A single electron moves so fast that it seems to be a cloud around the nucleus of an atom. This is because we as observers are bound by time and can not see the electron unless we bind it to time as well by creating an observation event. This event can then be "stamped with time" and the location of the electron can then be seen or "observed". Particles that are moving extremely fast will exhibit wave-like behavior because we can only observe them through a statistical wave function. So although an electron is a particle, because of our limitations, we see it a field of probability that collapses to a specific location soon as we bind it with time. Like a fan blade that's spinning around.......... as we observe it, it seems to be in all places all at once. But soon as we stop it with our finger (event), then we can observe it and see that it's a fan blade indeed after all. 😁 11 Reply 12 replies @anuragsharma8567 @anuragsharma8567 6 months ago Question is how do you make sure that these two particles are in entanglement Reply @nagavarun7232 @nagavarun7232 7 months ago It is a pity that the author of this film hadn't found a place for the great David Bohm and his contribution to the EPR paradox. 1 Reply @BaponKar @BaponKar 7 months ago It will be nice to get a technology which can entangled two broad particles group.... Reply @zendoc49 @zendoc49 9 months ago At the core the revelation is that there is no granularity to reality, its just a field. The properties of the field are well known as elucidated by Maxwell, in that the field exists at every point, it doesn't flow in one direction or other. what flows are the vectors of change in the fields in the form of entangled particles. its not just one particle or two. The particles follow wave function. Eventually we find the change or entanglement flows in all directions. If the vector is measured at one point it changes all the other points as well. Reply @pyrothefirst @pyrothefirst 5 months ago Easy, our universe was born from a black hole, that went critical but didn't explode, but blew a bubble. That also means everything was at one time the same particle and is now still attached to every particle in our universe. Once we work out quantum swapping, we can travel the universe instantly. Reply @jeremycookman8825 @jeremycookman8825 7 months ago (edited) Fantastic episode. Mankind's mind has such amazing abilities to observe and try making logic of everything... but there are supernatural things in this world that we will never understand if we have no faith God's unfathomable power. 3 Reply @elenacarlock9429 @elenacarlock9429 5 months ago I’m just a lay person but I find this fascinating. Question are the filters the same or different? Reply @BardovBacchus @BardovBacchus 8 months ago If the entirety of the universe is expanding, then isn't entanglement necessary to keep matter cohesive as it expands..? Reply 1 reply @thatsmallrockshop @thatsmallrockshop 6 months ago (edited) Quantum entanglement is the energy every atom gives off. That effects the energy from other atoms and alters the energy given off. Reply @fred-ricksch2095 @fred-ricksch2095 2 months ago (edited) Not the universe is the playing field, but the specific reality in which matter has a communal playing field. The Milky Way can be said to be the largest example of such a field, not the universe. Reply @user-ij6vg8xq2r @user-ij6vg8xq2r 9 months ago Well, yes, entanglement is "real" according to human maths - but only because entangled particles are part of a single system. 1 Reply @paulbunyan9436 @paulbunyan9436 9 months ago I hope to be around when they discover a unifying theory of the universe. 7 Reply 10 replies @UnratedMadness @UnratedMadness 1 month ago This simply proves that life is a real simulation run on entropy as its fuel, thus further proving enthalpy useful for remodeling this same simulation. Time is relevant to the observer, but not to the system. Reply @CameronBrtnik @CameronBrtnik 7 months ago Hope I live long enough to witness Entanglement being used in the first human teleportation to another part of the Cosmos 🌌 Reply @davidpeterson9507 @davidpeterson9507 7 months ago We are on the cusp of something great.I love this stuff.Anything is possible. 1 Reply 2 replies @mkupadhya @mkupadhya 7 months ago (edited) Great video, however at 20:24 he says "Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity equation is E = mc². That is incorrect. That formula describes the relationship between, mass(m), Energy(E) and the speed of light (c). Reply @upplsuckimcool16 @upplsuckimcool16 9 months ago How is it that a computer can't decipher the shortest distance between 30 cities, but can decipher the best move in Chess? How old is this documentary? What am I missing here? 1 Reply @codenamecatatonic8894 @codenamecatatonic8894 9 months ago (edited) It’s all happening at the same time man….😂🤟 I’m perplexed , surprised & scared all at the same intersection. Mind blown. ⏳⌛️ 5 Reply 1 reply @TheBandOfMrHand @TheBandOfMrHand 3 days ago (edited) Very interesting and revealing presentation, but can it be taken even further, and applied to the spiritual nature of humanity? This was what the 'hippie' generation was seeking - a combined relationship of the entanglement theory of quantum physics, with the spiritual-based eastern philosophy of human existence. The vast majority of people on this planet believe that humans possess an eternal soul, an energy, seperate from our physical selves. So, for those who believe this to be true, can the soul be split to exist in more than one place, or many places, at the same time, or is the soul too complex for quantum entanglement to apply? Does this support or help to disprove the theory for the existence of a multiverse? If it supports it, are we truly the same being or soul in each one, and therefore, do we behave the same way in each multiverse? Can something that affects us in one universe, affect us the same way in another one, or in every universe? 1 Reply @ClarenceCreekwater @ClarenceCreekwater 4 months ago If an electron can't be measured until observed, is it possible that the electron doesn't create information until it interacts with matter? All our detectors are made of matter. Reply @nicka.papanikolaou9475 @nicka.papanikolaou9475 7 months ago (edited) If I undertand entanglement correctly, it occurs only for particles that were originally generated by the same process, never by separate processes. So, they must have been initially together for them to be entagngled on Earth and In Andromeda. This measns that two particles will be unentangled if they are generated by separate processes! That means that Einstein was right, not Bohr. It is not that the particles got entangled over a disatance but that their properties and entanglement were defined by their being initially together and were then separated! This also means that elementary particles interact in specific ways when together, and entanglement is one interaction/protperty that does not chnage whether they are in Thessaloniki and Athens or In Athens and the Andromeda galaxy. Reply 1 reply @jamesbradford8574 @jamesbradford8574 9 months ago That some of these theories don't seem to coexist well is merely an imperfection in the sim. Reply @djayjp @djayjp 6 months ago (edited) There are other, equally valid interpretations of QM that state the uncertainty in their state is merely epistemic, not ontologic. These are fully deterministic interpretations, such as pilot wave theory or many worlds. Reply @PeterMorganQF @PeterMorganQF 9 months ago Very nice production, as we’re all so used to from PBS, but, sorry, off the pace on the physics. If one thinks in terms of signal analysis and events and fields instead of in terms of particles, Bell-type experiments are not specially confusing, they’re exquisite engineering of the noisy electromagnetic field within the apparatus. The noise and fields are together crucial because they put us in a thermodynamic context in which nonlocality and contextuality are classically natural. If we think in terms of two particles, not so much. Hopefully this will reach the level of PBS by 2030, but I’m a little hopeful that they might beat the upcoming centenaries that are about to come thick and fast. Not that anyone reads long YouTube comments😂 3 Reply 3 replies @beldeusingh483 @beldeusingh483 7 months ago What happens if you used light from the same quasar? Reply @MrHantz101 @MrHantz101 8 months ago It all comes down to the accuracy of your equipment. How do you know your filter can detect a single photon? What are you measuring it with? How is that tool calibrated? How accurate was the tool that calibrated it, and so on. A knife looks very sharp, but magnify the edge, and you'll see how jagged it is. Magnify one of the random waves of jaggedness, and you'll see even more jagged lines, fractally extending down to the fuzzy quantum level itself. Reply 1 reply @doncahooti @doncahooti 3 weeks ago so suppose another life form got a big supply of entangled pairs and sent all the partners into space a billion years ago or more - - if we could find the particles we could communicate with them , if they still exist . Reply @TheDeepening718 @TheDeepening718 6 months ago The most interesting thing said was that the particle didn't exist until observed. Reply @falvegas511 @falvegas511 3 months ago I enjoy NOVA presentations. Quantum Entanglement continues to Elude and Mystify me. 2 identical particles, one on the moon & identified, One forms a Letter - the Other Exactly Copies. Reply @vaheohanian8418 @vaheohanian8418 9 months ago (edited) More research should be done in Quantum (DNA / Telepathic) Entanglements with twins. The human brain operates with electrons, photons, molecules and etc---all part of Quantum Entanglements. 6 Reply 7 replies @andydrewlinger9301 @andydrewlinger9301 4 months ago In addition to the educational content, it's enjoyable, at least I think, to hear people with a first language other than English often use certain English words in their conversations--okay, yeah, etc. Reply @apainting4537 @apainting4537 9 months ago I think the way to explain entanglement is that observation is present in any particle, the idea that the observer needs to be large or human or conscious at all is kinda silly. Reply @zenri5363 @zenri5363 8 months ago That last bit of how life is a projection in a surface. Could that possibly be like how 2d is like paper to 3d us? could quantum entanglement just pop into the fourth dimension? And through 4d shape bs, somehow make them connect through some law of the 4d. Yall ever see basic 4d shapes and how they work? What if the particles that aren't being experienced are traveling through 4d somehow and still able to affect our dimension somehow Reply @bennattj @bennattj 9 months ago 38:00 That doesn't solve the man in the middle attack. You're still relying on communication one way or another and it can be intercepted. Simple: send an entangled particle from the eavesdropper to the man-in-the-middle, then they relay that the two messages were entangled (because it corrupts the original message checking whether or not they're authenticated). Reply @bnjm8868 @bnjm8868 5 months ago Think of computers sending information instantaneously from anywhere on the world from one place to another, or even through light years in space instantaneously. Reply @maniyembe @maniyembe 9 months ago (edited) Watching this has left me in a state of quantum stupefaction and existential spaghettification 3 Reply @shannah222 @shannah222 9 months ago (edited) Why not simply reconcile the 2 by reaching the rationale/understanding that anomalies/exceptions exist. Perhaps search for the condition(s) for exception(s) with the understanding that multiples may exist. Why must it be one or the other? Reply @danfoley6348 @danfoley6348 1 month ago I believe that there is a answer that ties these together, space should not be looked at as a 2 dimensional fabric, but like a 3 dimensional fluid, for every action there is a ripple effect reaction. And I propose that if the same expirement was done using 3 entangled particles it would also show the same resounding effects. Reply 1 reply @rob5894 @rob5894 9 months ago So how has Einstein been proved wrong? He said Quantum therory was incomplete. Well, since it can't explain how entangelement works, it must be incomplete. Reply @owood5243 @owood5243 6 days ago Particles only take on physical properties when we observe them because there would be no reason for it to be rendered. This way, the simulation runs smoother less processing speed needed. If no one is out looking at the moon, the moon wouldn't need to exist until it was needed to be observed. Reply @kennethsanders786 @kennethsanders786 7 months ago Einstein won his Nobel for the photo-electric effect. That was one of the explanations leading to quantum mechanics. EPR suggests that the understanding of quantum effects is incomplete. EPR was wrong about entanglement, but right about incompleteness. Just ask about dark matter and dark energy. and the eyes of physicists cloud over. Or, are these unresolved fields that have not yet collapsed into their detectable states. Many of the equations hold. Reply @coffee6776 @coffee6776 9 months ago Granted nobody is perfect, but Einstein was a true genius. 4 Reply 1 reply @josephtraficanti689 @josephtraficanti689 9 months ago (edited) When I took my engineering degree in electronics it was supplemented with courses in radiation detection of subatomic particle physics. As time went on the Large Hadron Collider was built and eventually went on line. Furthermore I did work at a 4 .2 Gigawatt nuclear power station. The result is this. Space and Time do not exist in isolation. Rather they are components of Spacetime. Meanwhile there are limits to the smallest sizes entities can be. A "particle of space" for instance. Or how small a period of time can be. Now let's consider the Big Bang. Some are saying that the Web telescope has disproved that Big Bang Theory. Whatever. But know this. The particle that make up physical matter came from somewhere. Where did it come from? It came from space itself. But it came into being with both Matter and Anti-matter. Conservation laws need to be in some kind of conformance. How we conform them probably has to do with frequencies. What works at this frequency may not always work at all frequencies. So. The universe is not really an illusion. It just is a reckoning that we do not yet know and teach what the frequency concepts are and how to apply them. As for energy we may also need to understand what entropy is and where it fits into our new ideas of what our new reality is and how it works. Stay tuned. This is going to be quite a mind stretch. We are on the edge of knowledge. We are lost, but making great time!!! (Yogi Berra) Reply @subrotoxing8214 @subrotoxing8214 7 months ago wonderfully presented Reply @willsworldoffitness5023 @willsworldoffitness5023 3 months ago Could this be like in our nervous system we have an action potential until it reaches 70 ma its just potential. When this is reached then it begins release of calcium ect for a crossbridge in the fiber. Mayne this is like that and observation gives it what it needs to become an action? Reply @qualquan @qualquan 6 months ago No info can travel faster than light BETWEEN structures or particles. There is no restriction WITHIN the structure or particle. Entangled photons is just an elongated photon and NOT a split photon because being a quantum particle it cannot be split. Also entangled particle(s) a=have a single wave function. Reply @michealfederici @michealfederici 8 months ago I remember my uncle used to talk about this as crazy as that sounds Reply @stephentackett4064 @stephentackett4064 9 months ago "He just wanted to know, what were God's thoughts when he created the world." 5 Reply @bd3470 @bd3470 8 months ago The probability that similar things are similar is somehow amazing? The part that should be studied is when they are not Reply @alonzomitchell8121 @alonzomitchell8121 7 months ago Very well done 🎉❤ Reply @donwhitmire978 @donwhitmire978 8 months ago I remember many years ago of a Russian scientist saying their was only one electron in the universe Reply @rameyzamora1018 @rameyzamora1018 9 months ago When science melds with the spirit. As above so below turns out to be an insight. Reply 1 reply @robinmeade7573 @robinmeade7573 8 months ago My question is, why 100% of pairs are not detected, but just majority is enough? Why some particles are not entangled? Reply 5 replies @JonnoPlays @JonnoPlays 9 months ago Have you ever thought of someone in your mind and then they call you on the phone a minute later? I want to see an experiment on that phenomenon. Maybe our minds are entangled on a quantum level? 🤔 339 Reply 198 replies @jamesstuartbrice420 @jamesstuartbrice420 9 months ago Perhaps the universe is filled with ether, and this is the medium by which information is instantaneously communicated anywhere in the universe, even thousands of light years away. Reply @bnjm8868 @bnjm8868 5 months ago We are on the verge of discovering faster than light communication and travel, through quantum dimensions. Reply @mikaelbiilmann6826 @mikaelbiilmann6826 7 months ago I always find it funny when documentarians mention John Bell as the young physicist and they show that one photo of him, not looking young at all! 😂 Reply 1 reply @josefkay5013 @josefkay5013 9 months ago Okay, I have to admit I don't understand the difference between two "entangled" objects, and two objects that are simply copies of each other. For instance, suppose I print two copies of a randomly selected text file whose contents I'm unaware of, seal the copies unread in separate envelopes, keep one envelope with me, and send the other one to the moon. Now, when I tear open my envelope and read the printout, I'll instantly know exactly what the envelope on the moon contains. Were the two envelopes "entangled?" Where's the "spooky action?" Why would I imagine that my reading of the printout here somehow "caused" the other one on the moon to be identical, when I was careful to "entangle" them from the start? Reply @SiddhanthRoyal @SiddhanthRoyal 7 months ago there is one thing that dosent qualify is that we are taking the measure and we get to know about the other one's detail.. the information is secured with us but it is still not known till that information is transmitted / observed there... this is why quantum entanglement is just a relation but not a method for communication Reply @marcelpacheco7878 @marcelpacheco7878 9 months ago The connections are not spooky; but spiritual! 10 Reply 5 replies @baruchben-david4196 @baruchben-david4196 3 months ago I'm still rooting for Einstein. I know physics says he was wrong, and he probably was... but I'm still rooting for him. Reply @jgunther3398 @jgunther3398 9 months ago the era of these old school million dollar documentaries is past, superseded by simple videos made by leading experts in the topic. thank g-d. Reply @dallasbagley @dallasbagley 9 months ago A wormhole connects the entangled particles. That's why the instantaneous communication. Reply @ivandan1174 @ivandan1174 2 months ago It is like if science until now was saying "Open your eyes, look and observe" now it says "Close your eyes, feel where things may be, presume roughly and calculate! - The result is only revealed only after you add one more term to THE equation!" Reply @wbiro @wbiro 8 months ago 20:32 but Einstein should have realized that that is how gravity works, one thing instantaneously affecting another over space... Reply @HDLowrider03 @HDLowrider03 9 months ago 😎👍👍 3 Reply @davidhodgins1335 @davidhodgins1335 7 months ago So, if a particle here on Earth is entangled with a particle on a planet within Andromeda, and we manipulate our particle here on Earth - its entangled partner within Andromeda should be manipulated at the same time. Conversely, an entangled particle within Andromeda should manipulate a particle here on Earth. So, if we don't see any random manipulation of particles on Earth(which cant be rationally explained), does that mean life doesn't exist (as we know it) other than on Earth? Reply 1 reply @djingusjonathaniii5210 @djingusjonathaniii5210 3 months ago loved the music and sounds put into this :) Reply @MichaelJoseph-id2lc @MichaelJoseph-id2lc 3 days ago And we are just now learning we as humans can be in two plases at the same time! Thanks to Carlos Castaneda. But we are trained to settle for Einstein's paradigm. Reply @gasperstarina9837 @gasperstarina9837 4 months ago No, laws of physics doen't apply on big objects but only on protons, electrons, quarks...and seems like some people just think they can use 2 branchs of physics on 2 total different fields...quantum reality isn't spooky till you use it on little particles and neither on "bigger" ones because it simply can't apply to it.. Reply @rayreinhard1077 @rayreinhard1077 8 months ago Bell's Theorem (also known as the Bell Inequality) is one of the most profound findings in physics, arrived at purely through deductive reasoning. John Bell likely would have been a candidate for the Nobel Prize, had he not died before being nominated. (The Prize is not awarded posthumously.) Bell's Theorem implies that three "common-sense" characteristics of reality cannot ALL be true; at least ONE must be FALSE. They are: (1) locality (no "spooky action at a distance"); (2) objective reality (reality that exists independent of the observer); and (3) free will (the universe is not deterministic, like a clock set in motion at the beginning of time). Recent discoveries in physics, in fact, point to the conclusion that BOTH (1) and (2) are false, i.e., entanglement/"spooky action at a distance" is real and reality only exists when it is observed. Reply @josephbunverzagt9535 @josephbunverzagt9535 9 months ago this is no premiere. I've seen all of this weeks ago. what a bummer 6 Reply @The1belal @The1belal 9 months ago So damn good to the last electron ! 1 Reply @lance862 @lance862 9 months ago Look into quantized inertia it marries the idea of Relativity and quantum mechanics to explain where inertia comes from it only disagrees with the equivalency principal at accelerations of 2 x 10 to the negative 10th meters per second per second which happens to perfectly explain Galaxy rotation as well... Reply @williameberle4250 @williameberle4250 5 months ago I hope I remember this documentary next time I’m tempted to get into an argument with someone. Reply @davidsparkman6590 @davidsparkman6590 8 months ago I side with Albert. Because my cat cannot understand something does not make it fuzzy or unknowable. Entanglement is dictated by the laws of conservation. Modern physics has badly misunderstood antimatter and therefore dark energy. There is still much to be learned about electrons and electric charge now that photons can be understood with the concept of antimatter having the property of negative g. 1 Reply @mdb1239 @mdb1239 2 months ago Mind boggling. Since everything came from the Big Bang -- everything in the Universe must be entangled with each other. So affecting an electron or photon must affect the entangled photon that happened at the Big Bang. Everything in the Universe is entangled. Reply @brentftaylor @brentftaylor 9 months ago 150 watchers but the number didn’t show up until I observed it ;-) 5 Reply 1 reply @andydrewlinger9301 @andydrewlinger9301 4 months ago Also interesting to see in the comments thread for this academic of a topic how many people who say they learned something from this are criticized, openly or in a subtle way, by the anti- or indifferent-to learning crowd. (And add the anti-science people, in this case, too.) Stop learning? Do this at your own peril. And to that of society, writ-large, as well. Reply @JuanRivera-gc7fq @JuanRivera-gc7fq 2 weeks ago Quantum relatism is best described in yawning and the effects of another yawning not consequently like a domino effect but contant like tha little c in mc2 and simultaneously. Reply @piusthegler2382 @piusthegler2382 7 months ago Did Zeilinger in this documentary know he was gonna be awarded with the nobel prize? Or does anyone know when the recordings took place? Reply @Robert-vh2cl @Robert-vh2cl 4 months ago (edited) The entire universe is digital not analog meaning space and time…. this is beyond the realm of science where all equations break down being based on an infinitely divisible quotient of space and time. While Newton was correct in his description, Aristotle was correct in his explanation. Zeno’s paradox is profound!!! Reply @onemediuminmotion @onemediuminmotion 9 months ago 'Separation in space' is 'separation in time.'. Not only is [_my_ use of] this statement a reference to the fact that it takes "time" for 'light' to "traverse" ['propagate through'/'produce the sensory-awareness waveform image of'] the '"intervening space"' between any two {"separate"} mass objects, it also refers to the fact that each 'separate unique individual' 'particulate mass-object' is 'physically defined/manifested' as such by [means and in terms of] the unique series-sequence[-additive combination] of light (EMR) waves impinging upon it [_as_ "it"] during the course of its "existence" as a specific [distinct and distinguishable as such] 'spacetime event'. This 'ability' of the universal-BH to 'manifest' its CPS ('center-point singularity') as/at 'many different particle-locations in space' at 'the same time'/'simultaneously' isn't a physical 'paradox', but rather a 'physical necessity' in order for it to 'manifest' "the [history of the] universe as we see [and otherwise 'experience'] it" _as such_. See also, and carefully digest, my comment at "What is a Worldview" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVAmY1HvExI). Reply @kellis491 @kellis491 9 months ago So is it like you exist - and you also exist somewhere else, in another space and time - two twins existing - but free to make their own choices? 😊 13 Reply 18 replies @SadhuBiochemist @SadhuBiochemist 9 months ago Perhaps what is missing is that spacetime itself is a physical entity. I used to think the old term aether was OK. If you asked the big question, what is everything in the universe made of, you should answer that: the universe is made of spacetime. All is this spacetime, which seems like nothing but is actually everything. I used to say, ALL IS AETHER. Matter can be made from spacetime by using energy. Matter has been described as "frozen energy" or perhaps trapped energy. Reply 2 replies @frostman7593 @frostman7593 2 months ago There is no riddle, matter changes differently under different forces, including the human body. Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 3 months ago No Einstein used Bore, that's very sneaky. What did he use Bore for? Anyone? Very interesting and very smart. You use your competitors as assistants without them knowing. It's like playing cards, you use the other players to defeat them. Very cool 😎 Einshtein very cool. Reply @timothynicoletti8956 @timothynicoletti8956 1 month ago I understood the whole episode. So did I. Reply @ingridhohmann3523 @ingridhohmann3523 7 months ago Quantum computer satellites ???wow,....Albert would like that 👍 Reply @battshytkrazy156 @battshytkrazy156 9 months ago 🤯🤔😜 3 Reply @bnjm8868 @bnjm8868 6 months ago Space does come from networks of entangled particles. The fabric of space is quantum fields made of quantum particles of quantum strings. Reply @timmueller1314 @timmueller1314 8 months ago I have to go with Einstein. Quantum Mechanics might seem like it's real but it's really just a perception error. When you're on the moon the earth is round. But if you zoom in to the top of Mount Everest you can seem to prove that it's not, because you're really observing two different things of the same reality. Reply @galkanftw @galkanftw 4 months ago I understood everything until the experiment which to me seems flawed. I thought the idea was to prove ONE set of particles/atoms could be reproduced elsewhere and causing an affect elsewhere.However this test sent TWO fuzzy waves in opposite directions but BOTH were identical so how does that prove the ONE set theory if using TWO sets? "see the world as it actually is"That would actually be as we PERCEIVE it to be and NOT factually how it really is. What seems left out is to explain HOW something could affect elsewhere at a distance further than the speed of light because to me it insists there are no physical laws sort of how the one guy stated "space is removed".Just the idea of removing space and time is a contradiction because that would imply a force an action that can move faster than the speed of light but again is just a weird thought process.Why stop at one happening why would this affect not affect multiple thousands billions of objects or particles elsewhere why does the theory stop at ONE identical exact image elsewhere instead of multiple I guess multiverses as we are theorizing. This set of theories to me sounds like an infinite response and all without any physics restrictions governed by Einstein's theories. Reply @billwells5057 @billwells5057 9 months ago I'm definitely not well versed on this subject, but why does the quantum entanglement experiment rely on statistical analysis? If quantum entanglement is true, shouldn’t the results show entanglement 100% of the time? Reply @randallpetroelje3913 @randallpetroelje3913 9 months ago This is how an extinction event is inevitable .(or not ☠️👻😂). I think this is a pivotal moment in human history to understanding of the universe and our relationship to it. Reply @AlexanderZapataIndividual @AlexanderZapataIndividual 9 months ago So you could not be a professor and question Quantum dynamics? You would be kicked out? Almost like a church. They probably also said "Trust the science". 3 Reply @rictheanonymouser873 @rictheanonymouser873 9 months ago if particles can move thru space and space and time are linked than they can move thru time. moving thru time enough and all space is at the same place there for allowing the two entangled particles to react to being observed simultaneously! Reply @johnhungerford6073 @johnhungerford6073 8 months ago An instrument captures an infinitesimally small moment in time. This is outside the relevance of reality. Any other questions? Reply @RobertKreutze-ie8yt @RobertKreutze-ie8yt 5 months ago From a purely logical point of view, space is infinitely large. From this it follows that matter can also become infinitely large and the speed infinitely slow. Conversely, there would also have to be infinitely small space with the associated matter, which is infinitely fast. That would mean: 1. Light is NOT the fastest thing there is. 2. There is no such thing as nothing at all. 3. Everything is (intelligent) matter. 4. Everything is connected or entangled with everything. Because of the laws of nature, it is also likely that basic structures, large and small, will repeat themselves indefinitely. This would result (quasi the “theory of everything”): (Radioactive/decaying)atom = star system/galaxy = universe Reply @Maddoktor2 @Maddoktor2 3 weeks ago "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." ~ Douglas Adams Reply @papavizion8893 @papavizion8893 9 months ago Einsteins theory of entanglement has ground , due to new particle accelerators there is a small chance of disruption of disturbance of Earth gravity or maybe creating a black hole vacuuming a planet. Reply @smartingamerica @smartingamerica 9 months ago (edited) Nova has presented fine science programming for decades. However, there has been a growing trend in productions to over-dramatize the presentation to the point where it is now repulsive. In future episodes could you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tone down the idiotic background 'music' which does NOTHING but distract the viewer and prevents them from understanding what the speakers in the program are saying? This has reached preposterous levels.. As one who has worked extensively in the science documentary industry as an award-winning specialist in vfx and in the capacity of production science advisor in both the television and film industries, I can affirm that if anyone had submitted sound-tracks like this back in the '70s through the '90s they would have been laughed right off the production. This infernal fashion which increasingly plagues public science education must be reduced to sane levels. Quit with the dramatic explosive sounds and imbecilic repetitive electronic music. It adds absolutely nothing and actually obscures and hinders the conveying of information. Thank you. 9 Reply 5 replies @leegramling1533 @leegramling1533 8 months ago The "elephant in the room" that everyone seems to be ignoring is that it all boils down to PERCEPTION. An electron, according to quantum theory, doesn't exist until it is PERCEIVED -- by a human, or by some system or device designed by a human to perceive like a human. In other words what we think of as "real" is only our perception of the "real" (whatever that may be). Plato pointed this out 1700 years ago with his cave analogy! Reply 2 replies @martywollner4128 @martywollner4128 9 months ago This documentary leans towards an INFORMATIONAL NETWORK of interconnected nodes. I have always said that our Universe is informational, and I have investigated the implications from a COMPUTATIONAL aspect. "WHO PROGRAMMED IT?", you ask? There are already an infinite number of algorithms that naturally occur, for example, ":y = x^2 for x = 1 to 100 as whole numbers". This simple algorithm plots out a parabolic shape. I contend that this shape exists, regardless of whether anyone has bothered to perform the calculations. The simple algorithm and the shape it plots out have existed forever. I believe that the TOE is just a simple, naturally occurring algorithm that plots our Universe, very similar to this example. The shape it plots out emerges as a 3-d network of interconnecting nodes. Dr Brian Whitworth has concluded this in his "Quantum Realism" papers. Dr. Stephen Wolfram has concluded this as well in his "New kind of science" papers. Me too! My basic premise is to approach the problem from the inside-out based upon (1) the theory of computing, and (2) Occam's razor. I have this documented... look for "Explaining the reverse-time ordering of light, part 1 and part 2 by Marty Wollner". YouTube, PLEASE don't delete this comment. 2 Reply @Ericthered330 @Ericthered330 8 months ago I wonder if this episode is now old news thanks to the James Webb Telescope. Reply @SadhuBiochemist @SadhuBiochemist 9 months ago I thought this was a case of the same physical phenomena being observed in different locations because the laws of physics are the same throughout. Reply 2 replies @Sagatiaej @Sagatiaej 7 months ago Could the two views exist? Perhaps not simultaneously but what if it’s more like chaos theory? Reply @skaterricky @skaterricky 9 months ago So basically I watched an entire documentary to tell me nothing has been truly proven. I wasted 53 minutes and 19 seconds of my life and the time I spent typing this comment. What a waste of time and space. 6 Reply 3 replies @rowingtothedream @rowingtothedream 9 months ago I always wished as I am older now that when we were young we were given the tools to know more of our spiritual being because church and religion don't cut it as I once was Catholic. I lost a boyfriend to drowning at fourteen and didn't handle it well as I spiraled out of control for many years this story could have changed it. Lovely. 1 Reply 2 replies @dankline7091 @dankline7091 8 months ago It's a shame Bell was never awarded the Nobel Prize. Reply @EVH5150iii @EVH5150iii 8 months ago So the macro universe is just the stem of quantum realm/quantum entanglement? Reply @esmannr @esmannr 9 months ago The Bell Test in this video did not prove that an entangled pair of quantum sized 'matter' will instantly communicate between here and say, the Andromeda Galaxy. It didn't even prove entanglement. The experiment created a pair of photons from the same atom. I would think that atom would make the same photons all the time. They're not entangled, they're just identical! Reply @vijay_kumar74 @vijay_kumar74 7 months ago So what are we saying now? In this holographic universe, now information can be made to travel faster than the speed of light? 1 Reply @bnjm8868 @bnjm8868 6 months ago (edited) Everything is located in 3 or 4D space. That idea is what makes it difficult to understand what is going on. Faster than the speed of light is possible at the quantum level. But, no in 4D space. Reply @marcusdale8476 @marcusdale8476 5 months ago knowing a little bit about electricity, not that I've ever created anything or engineered anything, but have wired in car stereos, I have wired houses, and understanding how the positive current always wants to seek a ground, how far fetched would it be that, the negatively charged electron, would be available for anything, that gives it a ground? It's always seeking, the positive charge, the proton, or, the positive voltage, a ground. Positive or negative, that's very simple. Why does quantum mechanics make it complicated? I don't understand. It seems very simple to me. Reply @PaulTheSkeptic @PaulTheSkeptic 9 months ago So, he says that if a soccer ball was the size of the earth, us being at our size would be at the proportion of the atoms. But how big would they be? Like cars or like a matchbook or what? Reply @ElrondHubbard_1 @ElrondHubbard_1 9 months ago Near the end, the surface of the sphere would be infinitely far from what, the quantim particles? Reply @sonarbangla8711 @sonarbangla8711 7 months ago PBS doesn't report Einstein's quantum riddle. He claimed probability was no way to do physics, physics is always deterministic and Einstein is right, the universe is non-locally entangled as cloning becomes impossible, resulting in determinism as in QC function. Reply @TJ-xt6pc @TJ-xt6pc 1 month ago Perhaps gravity is the mechanism. It's instantaneous. Unfortunately, we don't know what gravity is at a particle level. 1 Reply 1 reply @kendallkahl8725 @kendallkahl8725 1 month ago Ultimately they will find the speed of entanglement is the speed of light cubed. Just like matter is squared to yield the potential energy when Creation first began it was at the speed of light times the speed of light times the speed of light for an enormous amount of time. Light kept reducing its speed by minutiae until after long enough it dropped down speed of light cubed which after nearly an infinite amount of time it dropped to the speed of light cubed. Everything is actually the same thing just at different vibrational frequency. It wasn't until light dropped to something before what it is now did Creation start talking on properties of the energy and matter. Light is still reducing speed at tiny tiny increments. At such speed something in one galaxy could affect something in another galaxy with only a tiny time gap. Perhaps things could have been even faster at the start. Reply @lawrencemaweu80 @lawrencemaweu80 7 months ago Einstein was wrong. It is possible for things to move faster than the speed of light. However, no one would be able to measure the movement since you cannot see it anyway. Reply @DeZahsterBoon @DeZahsterBoon 9 months ago I don’t believe that the new experiment featured in this episode did anything to “close the loophole”. Yes, the light from the quasars is purely random and uncorrelated. However the detectors which are gathering this light are located at the very same point where the quantum entangled particles are being detected! The problem in the initial filter experiments was that they weren’t truly random. The exact same logic applies to the telescopes detectors! 2 Reply @JafoTHEgreat @JafoTHEgreat 3 months ago 31:51 that picture looks like the coolest math band to ever grace my eyes. Reply @waynecontinuum7934 @waynecontinuum7934 9 months ago If I understand this correctly you end this documentary with the hypothesis that quantum particles are the cause of spacetime and more primary than spacetime. However when the psychological self with its filtering system is dissolved ,than for that human, the idea of separate objects and cause and effect between them, is replaced with the perception of the whole moving as the only source of causation . In other words you moving your arm is really the whole moving as a cause of itself. Reply 2 replies @JeffWusch @JeffWusch 6 months ago So how fast do your filters change state? Must be faster than light to be able to introduce randomness into something that is faster than light Reply @renat3x @renat3x 1 month ago Ya no se razona, solo se acepta. Nuestro sentido común no forma parte de los hechos así como la experiencia. Reply @dazenguile4215 @dazenguile4215 9 months ago if his argument is was ‘well the moon exists while we don’t see it during the day’, then einstein isn’t nearly as smart as i thought lol Reply @josephcollins6033 @josephcollins6033 7 months ago Alright- then how can you know something is fuzzy BEFORE IT IS MEASURED if you can't truly know something UNTIL it is measured? This drives me crazy!!!! Help!!!!! 1 Reply @johnhungerford6073 @johnhungerford6073 8 months ago When you finally get to the right question and ask it the answer will be “you should have not asked this question”😎 Reply @carriagereturned3974 @carriagereturned3974 3 months ago does this doc takes into account recent discovery? I think no, as i understood it states that entangled particles state is really undefined until measured ... some kind of Bell's... theory (it's not a theory anymore) ... Reply @maurasawyer4852 @maurasawyer4852 6 months ago Quantum entanglement could be the process of going to the parallel universe? Reply @mukundlk @mukundlk 7 months ago Such experiment should be done from India where weather is always warm and above zero in most of places Reply @juneyang1400 @juneyang1400 9 months ago Ultimately Fascinating ❤ Reply @user-wd1oq7ls3g @user-wd1oq7ls3g 3 weeks ago This was a very interesting show. Reply @baberoot1998 @baberoot1998 9 months ago (edited) It is amazing how our Creator/Designer made "reality". With information...(and scientists will admit this about information), you can always trace it, (information), back to a mind. There is a Creator/Designer...who created all this information. It is as clear as the nose on Einstein's face. Even Einstein, himself, admitted...God exists. 1 Reply @ericday4505 @ericday4505 9 months ago (edited) As a theist , it is rather fascinating that, the more science learns or discovers if you will, the farther it appears that our minds are compared to God's mind for lack of a better way of putting it, it seems the more science learns the more staggering the casm between created minds, and our creators mind. Right. Reply @e4d578 @e4d578 8 months ago That scientist does a pretty good Arnold Schwarzenegger impression Reply @CliffCardi @CliffCardi 6 months ago Einstein: “I believe in objective reality.” Bohr: “What does that mean?” Schrödinger: “It means he’s afraid of quantum entanglement.” Einstein: “No it doesn’t!” Bohr: “Spoooooky Aaaaaction at a diiiiiiiistance!~” Schrödinger: “Stop it, Niels! You’re scaring him!” Reply @uniqueyunus @uniqueyunus 4 weeks ago Anybody explain me please how they produce entangled photons if still entanglement was not proven Reply 1 reply @Jesus-iz5sd @Jesus-iz5sd 7 months ago As reminder: "Conservation of Matter and Energy" is; Any amount o matter being lost, there is corresponding amount of Energy being formed AND, any amount of Energy being lost, there is corresponding amount of Matter being formed. THUS; Matter and Energy are 2 Forms of the same thing - being said originally by Einstein. 1 Reply @cerberus2881 @cerberus2881 4 months ago (edited) Terribly interesting! Entanglement appears to win! Reply @briangeisler3275 @briangeisler3275 9 months ago This is all very fascinating Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 9 months ago Quasars produce flashing electrons pulsars and quasars different in photons and electrons or radio wave radiation. The spectrum of em is very different. Reply @synopticfixes6213 @synopticfixes6213 9 months ago So... What is consciousness? How does it relate to all this. The act of observing. Reply @khkartc @khkartc 9 months ago And the more we know, the more we think we know, even though every new discovery in Physics brings into greater relief what we don’t know. I’m sorry, but the notion of a holographic universe seems to imply—at least—the existence of a projectionist. But how would anyone of human understanding ever know? Reply 1 reply @davidparadis490 @davidparadis490 9 months ago (edited) Einstein and Tesla...Two geniuses who we still need today...nobody has caught up to Tesla yet. 1 Reply 1 reply @rwinestock @rwinestock 8 months ago What percent consistency of entanglement from all the samplings? That is missing here and critical. If it is not 100% or at least very close, it shows just the opposite. Why withhold that critical data? Reply @stevengraham9191 @stevengraham9191 3 months ago Quantum entanglement is like your shadow. It's there exactly like Einstein said, except like your shadow. One will always correlates with the other Reply @hemadayal7815 @hemadayal7815 3 months ago einstein was deep...he saw more than he could express... Reply @markoconnell804 @markoconnell804 9 months ago Are these connected by a different dimension? Separated in our dimension but joined in another dimension. Reply @isaacgarza3307 @isaacgarza3307 7 months ago I think their information became entangled … and entangled information does travel faster than light. Reply @MilkyWayGalaxyy @MilkyWayGalaxyy 8 months ago So what was the conclusion? That a cause in one part of the universe has an effect in another part of the universe and we cannot explain why?? 1 Reply 1 reply @21972012145525 @21972012145525 9 months ago I have yet to see a documentary that explains quantum mechanics/entanglement and the holographic universe for lay people. You’d think they would know how to easily explain this by now? Less hippie history(seriously what was the point of that part ) and more time spent actually explaining why and what is exactly happening Reply 10 replies @michaeljoeallen9412 @michaeljoeallen9412 13 days ago Excellent presentation Sabine. 🎉 Reply @BigNewGames @BigNewGames 9 months ago Quantum entanglement does NOT happen to matter having mass. It only happens to EM fields and light particles because they do NOT contain mass plus, they travel at c. The only exception is the space or distance between us and extremely distant galaxies. According to special relativity time slows to a stop upon reaching the speed of light. So a photon can travel hundreds of billions of light years in an instant because traveling at c time is zero to all observers. The light particle can radiate from a galaxy 20 billion light years away and the light information will be instantly conveyed to any observer within the EM field the instant it is measured. This is called quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement happens because light travels at c and time equates to being zero to all observers within the EM field they are measuring. This effect doesn't happen to matter at rest. The Earth and all the other planet's EM fields are entangled to the sun's EM field. Yet none of the planets rotate or spin like the sun does. Their fields are entangled yet none of them have a mirrored spin like what happens to light particles. So quantum entanglement does NOT happen to all particle like the video claims, "happens between pairs of particles". It happens to light contained inside the same EM field because their fields are entangled to each other. The field is made of potential light particles. The light upon measuring takes on the information of the EM field. If the field is manipulated and two particles of light are measured at the same time then they both take on the attributes of the EM field upon measuring. The field doesn't collapse. It's still there to be measured again. Einstein called quantum entanglement spooky action at a distance because it contradicted his general relativity. But if you sit and think about it, his special relativity also contradicted general relativity with time dilation occurring to bodies traveling at c or close to large mass. General relativity claimed light takes time to travel great distances then special relativity claims traveling at c time is zero. The two theories are opposite, becoming oxymoronic. Even quantum tunneling occurs to energy or electrons and NOT to particles having mass. Yet I've watched so many videos where the narrator claims a ball could potentially pass through a solid wall and emerge instantly on the other side. That's not true either because the ball isn't traveling at c and it contains mass. So it cannot quantum tunnel through anything. IMHO quasars don't radiate visible light. They radiate massive amounts of high energy invisible light. Similar to the high energy light emanating from the core of our own galaxy. Quasars look extremely bright because they are rapidly moving away from us so, the high energy invisible light shifts into the visual spectrum. It's an illusion. In reality, general relativity is incomplete. That is why laws of motion and general relativity are unable to accurately predict or describe the motion of most visible matter in the universe. John Stewart Bell scheduled a press conference claiming he had some wonderful news about experiments in quantum entanglement, linked to the conscious field of GOD and wanted to share it with the world. But before he could tell everyone he died of a mysterious brain hemorrhage. I know what he was going to tell the world. In 1999 I worked for Roger G. Vogelsang a physics professor. He explained everything to me. Do you remember in the movie Men In Black when J shot a moving target resembling a little girl with a physics book, not the monsters? Was it a subliminal message to all other physicists, if they stepped out of line it would happen to them too? Talk about spooky action at a distance. @48:21 Einstein's theory of general relativity does not perfectly explain space, time and gravity at the largest scales of the universe. It can't explain why our solar system is moving away from the supermassive black hole Sgr A* at around 900,000 mi/h. GR doesn't explain why our solar system is orbiting some 26,000 light years away from the black hole at around 536,000 mi/h. General relativity and the laws of motion can't explain the motion or trajectory of our solar system. It can't explain why our galaxy is moving at about 1.37 million mi/h. It can't explain why galaxies are accelerating away from us in every direction or why extremely distant galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light. General relativity can't explain the high velocity dispersion rate of matter in our galaxy. It can't explain the young stars orbiting extremely close to the black hole Sgr A*. ALMA radio telescope reported in 2021 that young stars were being birthed close to the supermassive black hole Sgr A*. They recently spotted a new star form inside a large gas cloud. They named it S4716. It has an orbital period of 4 Earth years and reaches a velocity of about 5,000 mi/s (8,000 km/s). According to relativity the gravity of the supermassive black hole is too harsh for stars to form close to it. The gas is supposed to become spaghettified before it can condense into a star. But the opposite was measured by ALMA. Stars are being birthed close to the supermassive black hole. The crazy thing, the oldest bodies orbiting the black hole are the satellite galaxies extremely far away. They are more than 13 billion years old. If we take the velocity, acceleration and trajectory of all the bodies in our galaxy, reverse time in a thought experiment, in 13.7 billion years everything in our galaxy merges with the supermassive black hole. This data completely contradicts general relativity claiming nothing, not even light is able to escape the gravity of a black hole. Astrophysicists after discovering how the motion, acceleration and trajectory of the stars and other bodies in the Milky Way came from the black hole, now they're trying to blame the injection of matter and energy on a white hole. Meaning they are claiming Sgr A* is a white hole in disguise. According to the data it completely contradicts the predictions made by general relativity and the laws of physics. Heck, it even contradicts the big bang theory and the evolutionary cosmological model of the universe. Why have astrophysicists not come forward to admit what the data, motion, acceleration and trajectory of the matter in our galaxy implies? Most likely it's because the data, like what John Stewart Bell discovered about quantum entanglement, doesn't fit the narrative they're trying to convey. Observations are empirical evidence that cannot be disputed. The facts indicate something completely different than what they've been saying about how the universe began and more. I wish I could explain everything in detail here, include the links and papers, dates, and more but it would take way too long. 1 Reply @shehnazgill477 @shehnazgill477 7 months ago I just love it ♥ Reply @thecommonsenseconservative5576 @thecommonsenseconservative5576 3 weeks ago No one will tell you but general relativity was proposed 100 years before Einstein but couldn't be proven due to lack of technology. It was a German physicists can't remember name but easily looked up Reply @thedalillama @thedalillama 9 months ago They never explain the math that leads to the theories. A simplified version would be nice to understand, if that is possible. Reply @pauljmn9135 @pauljmn9135 2 months ago I don't think the theory suggests that information travels faster than light . Reply @rollingrock3480 @rollingrock3480 1 month ago Thanks so much for the video! Reply @saxonalexander3888 @saxonalexander3888 9 months ago When you heat up a piece of metal it takes time for the heat to travel from hot to cold. I'm happy entanglement runs our computers so it's obviously correct but it doesn't address entropy. Reply @johnrogan9420 @johnrogan9420 7 months ago Certainly gravity causes objects to fall back or forward. Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 9 months ago The likelihood of double bonds between the carbons. The likelihood of the electrons of hydrocarbons being close to the carbons not the protons. The spin of the protons are either up or down but we don't know until we measure the orientation. Reply 1 reply @gerhardgschwandtner8693 @gerhardgschwandtner8693 3 weeks ago So our being and everything on earth is affected by the universe around us, and vice versa to a lesser extent? Reply @gbrlljns @gbrlljns 8 months ago Stunning concepts... Reply @greggweber9967 @greggweber9967 9 months ago 3:00 Imagine X, Y, and Z at one time of universe A corresponding with some arbitrary X, Y, Z, and time of universe B. Our universe, A, affects something corresponding to it in universe B. It bounces back, but elsewhere and not randomly. How? Reply 1 reply @TheEndevour2010 @TheEndevour2010 9 months ago Wondering, is there's a hidden dimension thru which all matter is reachable as if they are next to each other. Like internet made information available across vast distances. Or like a hidden worm hole thru which matter can reach each other without real travel. If such a phenomenon is discovered and exploited, we could travel to the outer reaches of this universe without leaving your cup of coffee. Yes, I'm dreaming. Reply @robertwilber1909 @robertwilber1909 9 months ago I like the assumption that the entire universe isn't motivated by an initial cause that has left everything we perceive synchronous in ways we do not and may never understand. What if there really is a God? Reply @user-gy8ue3ey6z @user-gy8ue3ey6z 3 months ago good information, thank u )) Reply @firehorse2008 @firehorse2008 6 months ago Entanglement = "the force"👌🏾👍🏾 1 Reply @SadhuBiochemist @SadhuBiochemist 9 months ago The spooky action at a distance is just the universality of laws of physics? No information was transferred between the particles; the information or the observations of the two particles were there throughout all of spacetime? Reply @greatempty @greatempty 8 months ago it asks "do we live in Einstein's common-sense world?" Yeah, you know, where time speeds up/slows down, where gravity bends space. Common sense. Reply @michaelmallin1 @michaelmallin1 3 weeks ago "As if there is no space in between them." The realm of primal matter before there was space. Reply @75YBA @75YBA 5 months ago ❤ you WGBH, NOVA & PBS FOREVER!😊 Reply @poughkeepsieblue @poughkeepsieblue 9 months ago Quantum physics proves we live in a simulated reality. As quantum particles are merely possible forms of information, which omly becomes information when we want to see what information we are looking for. Its a design flaw in the simulation, or the observable limit of tje simulation. At some point information must be carried, and at some point, if we are intuitive and look close enough, we will find where that is carried. We have, in quantum physics. Reply @jeffrowlette @jeffrowlette 3 months ago We need to look into the nature of consciousness to explain the nature of reality. All rules are out of the window at this point. We've been looking at what we see instead of what we are. Einstein and even quantum physics are ignoring the nature of consciousness. Reply @khor201 @khor201 8 months ago How small can they see? Is it all just math problems? Pertaining to what they can or can’t see Reply @virginiamaniscalco9075 @virginiamaniscalco9075 8 months ago It is the most exciting, most befuddling bunch of ... stuff! I do not pretend to understand it, but entanglement appeals to my intuition. Reply @MrFetusKing @MrFetusKing 3 months ago Soo... signals to the qasars billions light years away are selecting the photons that are "entangled" not randomly but rather selectively? As in show in showing that they are traveling faster than the speed of light because they are in fact entangled? Reply @georgejamesducas9602 @georgejamesducas9602 9 months ago (edited) Amazing that so many people are all wrong and won the Nobel prize, many of them suffering from Heisenberg uncertainty Reply @ateviel @ateviel 4 months ago 31:58 The Founders of the New Age movement and all the philosophies of attraction, the will of the mind, power of visualization, and so on, which were born out of it and shaped modern culture for generations since then. :-) Reply @yahshua1110 @yahshua1110 7 months ago In other words if you can imagine it, it can become. Reply @kurtbogle2973 @kurtbogle2973 9 months ago Applying quantum mechanics to spirituality. Druids are suppose to exist both on Earth and in the Otherworld. Quantum mechanics makes this sound like it just might be reality. 1 Reply @spitfirelast8761 @spitfirelast8761 1 month ago I beg to differ.... the test done with the telescope was incomplete. They need to take account the earth's rotation which has time and fabric of space. They didn't include the time in erath's rotation while the photons were traveling. Which is impossible because you need to stop earth's rotation and froze time, except for the photons only moving to accurately measure the entanglement. So it still incomplete. Reply 1 reply @JNieckarz @JNieckarz 3 months ago Everything in this "universe" is connected. Reply @paulkininmonth6972 @paulkininmonth6972 3 months ago Wait until the end, it resolves like a Christopher Nolan plot ⚛️ 1 Reply 1 reply @tonyrony1943 @tonyrony1943 3 months ago Are we far behind in comparison with this quantum mechanics Reply @pierre606 @pierre606 9 months ago Is water a wave, nope. It can fool you if you don't know about hydrogen and oxygen molecules. An electron is made of particles, it only appears as waves. It's just that we haven't discovered the particles that make up an electron. Quantum entanglement will not work beyond a certain distance because the particles are actually connected at large distances. This may seem impossible, yet I find it far more impossible to believe the atom is made of some ethereal fuzz that combines when observed. These basic particles physically stick together. Think of light, it travels large distances. The particles stick together even more that light as light is made up of them. So is everything. We will eventually find these basic particles. We haven't reached the end of our understanding of the atom. Reply @VidyaBhushanSingh2004 @VidyaBhushanSingh2004 7 months ago In Hindu philosophy, there are lot of theories about entanglements. Some physicists should look into that from an open mind instead calling it mombo jumbo. Quarks were known for thousands of years in the Hindu philosophy. Reply @richardmaviladesign6645 @richardmaviladesign6645 8 months ago Looking at quantum entanglement on a spiritual plane, can prayer reach the creator through something like this avenue? 7:53 Reply @LorneABrown @LorneABrown 3 weeks ago (edited) Every answer but one, the last one, can be answered using (+)+(-1)=0. Einstein was, is, and always will be CORRECT! The universe is deterministic. Reply @roundedges2 @roundedges2 7 months ago (edited) Entangled kids AMAZING phenomenon: A woman had two kids, born at the exact same moment, from one egg--"emitted", you might say "photon-like", from her womb. 20 years later, although one grew up in Siberia and the other on an island other side of the world--with no communication between them--when one was measured to be 7 feet tall, LO and BEHOLD! the other one was found to ALSO be 7 feet tall. Furthermore, when one had blue eyes, SHAZZAM! so did the other one! It is as if one was SPOOKILY AT A DISTANCE communicating his exact features to the other. In experiment after experiment, kids born at the same moment from the same mother exhibit this MAGICAL phenomenon. CRAZY, huh? 1 Reply @fcapio @fcapio 7 months ago After one hour all you know is entanglement is still a theory…. Reply @harryape9059 @harryape9059 8 months ago (edited) How the hell does the Electron "know" it's being observed? Reply 1 reply @uberfu @uberfu 8 months ago Hacking Quantum Entanglement - "hacking" IS NOT about directly attacking the security measure (although groups do this sort of thing for a challenge) it's about finding the weakest link in the chain - IDC how secure you think your quantum netowork is as long as some idiot was duped into giving up their access credentials. Or some "security expert" leaves off the shelf software defaulted to the factory settings after they install something or perform an upgrade. Quantum Entanglement will not solve personal stupidity. Reply @fuckjoebidentraitor1262 @fuckjoebidentraitor1262 6 months ago Things can't be random if they embrace entanglement. Especially if ppl embrace multiple dimensions like the D Wave Quantum cpu can supposedly access according to Geordie Rose. JMO. Reply @iron0xide974 @iron0xide974 8 months ago Einstein Rosen bridge is the same as entanglement transport layers. Reply @oturgator @oturgator 5 months ago Is there even time in Quantum level, where everything is at light speed? How to compare a Newtonian system where there is time with a Quantum system where there is no time. Reply 1 reply @brillantcruz625 @brillantcruz625 7 months ago What Next after Quantum Physics? I Believe AI already Explained this to Physicists who Seek Answers Reply @LassieFarm @LassieFarm 8 months ago Gee thanks Einstein 👍 you're the best Reply @gimmyherbert8217 @gimmyherbert8217 7 months ago Learning to get a rocket to be shot from space...will help scientists to propel ship further into space Reply @johncurl9498 @johncurl9498 6 months ago (edited) Quantum entanglement is all well and good if time and space is a mere illusion. But I want to figure out clothes hanger entanglement. A far more vexing mystery to me. Reply @axle.australian.patriot @axle.australian.patriot 7 months ago And in the end we come to realize we are just some other sentient life forms elaborate quantum version of the computer simulation "Game of life". Reply @vincentmangano4258 @vincentmangano4258 9 months ago Wouldn’t the clouds be apart of the entanglement? Anyone who says they understand this , and can’t explain it... or prove it ... seems silly Reply @bsmith577 @bsmith577 8 months ago Space is the source of entanglement and the source of all matter since Space is the largest thing in the universe and makes up everything in it. We ourselves live in space, made up of space and our complete thought process is spacial. Space is the fabric of everything. Reply @ELMohel @ELMohel 9 months ago Being an Identical twin I / we would be in the process of calling each other so much so the phone did not have time to ring and we were both on the line. The distance of California and Colorado. We were different in personality. Far too many events to ignore entanglement. I feel that entanglement is not just part of the construct, Rather entanglement is the entire construct. Vis-a-vis אהיה אשר אהיה. Reply @davewickizer4506 @davewickizer4506 9 months ago I vote for Wheelers foam at the quantum level plus. Been around for a minute. Maybe proven ?! Reply @tresajessygeorge210 @tresajessygeorge210 9 months ago Beautiful...!!! THANK YOU...!!! Reply @shredd1190 @shredd1190 4 months ago Einstein also believed In AC current instead DC current. Reply @gerbenhoutman9348 @gerbenhoutman9348 4 months ago 3:11 I believe that this is a false dichotomy. I, personally, believe that quantum entanglement is a property of light. The wave nature of light would be spread over distance creating the 'spooky action'. I guess I have the hubris of disagreeing with Einstein as well as QM lol Reply @grouchyoldman5348 @grouchyoldman5348 6 months ago What if there is a quantum realm, apart from the quantum realm we are living in, and so on and so forth! We are apart of a world of living things we cannot see because we are microscopic! Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I understood he said he said you throw two dice it doesn't matter the reflection of light on the dice with matters is the fact that you should have the same dimensions because the fact is they're both keep it inside so it nothing changes or the imagination of the description I got you Reply @deadpanfish3351 @deadpanfish3351 3 months ago So happy our salesmen will be a little more efficient in their travels. 1 Reply @SteveC38 @SteveC38 9 months ago I Enjoyed This! Reply @markcampbell7577 @markcampbell7577 9 months ago How are the photons from calcium produced? Why do they think there is only two identical photons produced. Reply 1 reply @chriszablocki2460 @chriszablocki2460 3 months ago The "if it ain't menstuated, it ain't ready yet" theorem. Reply @ldolan4051 @ldolan4051 7 months ago I call it life and lifeafter and that connection, like mother and child. Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago The universe does not run on math. The universe runs on time. Time is the energy that produces existence. For example, the sun. 1 Reply @johnnytowner2610 @johnnytowner2610 6 months ago All time is a measurement only. Quantum entanglement is why everything is. Period 1 Reply 1 reply @kirkmarch4713 @kirkmarch4713 9 months ago What if the 1st observer of the spooky particles sets the characteristics of that particle beyond all space and time; might that 1st observer not be who we call God? Reply @timothy8426 @timothy8426 9 months ago Space is a stationary negative cold field of resistance that coexist with thermal energy singularity frequencies. These two forces repel each other. Space passes through mass as mass occupies space in forward maximum momentum velocity in resistance. Conservation of maximum momentum velocity in resistance is constant in and out of entanglement. Quantization doesn't slow down. Thermal energy singularity frequencies are redirected trajectories cycling in mass. Distance of forward maximum momentum velocity in resistance is constant throughout space as space. Mass amplifies space. Resistance is equal to mass. Black holes are bubbles void of thermodynamics. Thermodynamics is outward force of pressure known as weight in mass. Resistance passing through mass is neutralized in equalization. Proximity mass is repelled towards mass of least resistance. When a star loses its ability to recycle its circulation patterns holding mass together, it is repelled outward towards points of least resistance. The resistance repels thermal energy singularity frequencies into space and the outer resistance repels it into unidirectional forward maximum momentum velocity in resistance. A whirlpool of circulation plasma. All thermal energy is repelled into the river of flow as the point of least resistance. Proximity mass is weakened towards the greater mass of neutralized resistance. This neutralized resistance in the greater mass weakens the outer core of the star towards the greater mass. The stars cycling patterns are disrupted by the neutralized resistance. The stars outer core is repelled towards the greater mass of least resistance. Trajectories are unidirectional flow cycling. Only mass interacts with mass. Resistance is equal throughout space in entanglement and out of. Thermal energy is the variant. Objects of mass fall at the same value, because resistance is equal to all mass. Two opposing universes collided? If the big bang happened, galaxies would be moving outward. Andromeda is moving where? Physicists say it's headed towards the milkyway. Why would it be heading on a collision course? Debris would be outward force. What is a neutron? Resistance to thermal energy singularity frequencies. Are electrons cold stationary negative resistance passing through mass from forward momentum? Space is vibrating. Thermal energy singularity frequencies coexist throughout space as dark energy passing through us as we occupy each point in vibrating amplification of space itself. Entanglement is unidirectional harmonics harmonization of thermodynamics in resistance. Frequencies are created by repulsion to thermal energy singularity frequencies. These frequencies spiraling throughput space in avoidance patterns. As these frequencies harmonize in entanglement of resistance to forward momentum, resistance matches the entanglement. The greater the mass, the greater the resistance. Trajectories of thermodynamics are redirected into cycling circulation patterns holding mass together. Distance of forward momentum is reduced by cycling patterns of mass. Bubbles of space are devoid of thermodynamics, because thermodynamics are the weakest point of resistance. The stars loss of cycling circulation of thermodynamics loses it and the lost thermodynamics spiraling around the void bubble. Resistance bubble. A empty vacuum of resistance only. Thermodynamics is outward force of pressure in repulsion and is also a propellant. Thermodynamics is both clockwise and counterclockwise. Alpha and Omega. Everything in between. Two opposing forces coexist as space itself. Entanglement is harmonization of flow. Light is in resistance, and is mass. Quantization snowballing into elements. Hydrogen absorbs thermal energy and expands into helium. Resistance is neutralized in mass as outward force of pressure known as weight. Resistance is equal to the mass. Resistance and thermal energy singularity frequencies pass through mass in equalization to forward momentum. Decay and aging occurs as we vibrate through space as space itself. Thermal energy is the variant. If thermal energy is not passing equally through mass it ages or decays. Resistance is equal throughout space as space. The negative cold field of resistance passes through mass in equalization. Thermodynamics variations affecting masses transference is the breakdown of mass. Only thermodynamics can make or break mass. Density cannot squeeze resistance. Resistance repels thermal energy singularity frequencies. These two forces coexist as space itself and mass cannot collapse into resistance. They are forced fields of repulsion to cold and thermal energy singularity. Warm is cold surrounded. Mass is thermal energy surrounding resistance and neutralizing it. Accumulated thermodynamics in resistance. What is a neutron. It is resistance being replaced from forward momentum. What is an electron? The neutron that has been replaced. Electricity doesn't run through wires. It is accumulated thermodynamics from forward momentum released by interactions. It is decay. It is the rot you smell from decays. All outward forces are released thermal energy singularity frequencies as mass cycling breaks down into primordial origins. Space itself eventually. Thermal energy singularity frequency, not in entanglement but always in resistance. Reply 1 reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 7 months ago Since the stars are made of pure hydrogen particles they are fusing as fast as they can and then something happens the fusion process stops. So what happens to all those particles that made the star well since the were pure hydrogen particles stars they didn't live for very long and went super duper supernova. And all those giant hydrogen stars left behind what we now call singularities, but the process also produced something else more particles but the fusion process did something incredible it turned hydrogen particles into helium particles. So now we have singularities all across the universe and the new born universe was awake the clock started on our universe we see today. But something else happened those singularities did something else they save the information they remembered how they were born and how do we know this? Well all the particles that went into make the star had the emfc and when those stars went supernova the emfc was saved inside the singularities they saved the charge that started the entire process. That's the information that was saved. The singularities are the information inside of each one is the information of the earliest possible time of our universe. Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Everything I a very minute way is apart of everything else! Nature is very very extremely subtle... Reply @jonnham @jonnham 7 months ago I'm just here for the NOVA theme song 😅. Jk I love this stuff. Reply @infamoustimes2927 @infamoustimes2927 3 months ago We haven't lived long enough to build the technology to watch where the particular is at live in real time yet. Once we build that and watch the particular live we'll see how intangment only works at our speed which will still work with Quantum Computers until we start traveling faster than light. Just like we're seeing how the Big Bang Theory was wrong we'll learn more about Quantum Theories within another 20 years. July 20th 2023 it was said by Joseph Reply @craigwall9536 @craigwall9536 8 months ago Ah, the power of statistical sophistication! Dewey defeats Truman! Reply @zoltanmeksz7625 @zoltanmeksz7625 6 months ago Very interesting. Reply @rosmalinamalina9260 @rosmalinamalina9260 6 months ago The truth is, you are amazing❤ Reply @giantclam1822 @giantclam1822 8 months ago 9 times I felt the need to look outside at my car....all 9 times I saw it being damaged. Reply @bennattj @bennattj 9 months ago To say that this quantum computer is faster than that PC over there...would be a great slight to the PC over there because that quantum computer is no where near as powerful or useful. Reply 2 replies @sangeet9100 @sangeet9100 6 months ago It is kind of disappointing to "understand" that my actions aren't uniquely mine after all, that it's controlled by numerous entangled processes of unknown entities at unknown locations Reply @deemingo8951 @deemingo8951 3 months ago Thing is, the universe, all we see, every particle is or was one particle. So like a spider web what happens at any point on it will be known-felt throughout the whole web n the spider itself. Reply 1 reply @andysmith9094 @andysmith9094 1 month ago The only theory that explains Quantum physics fully, is that man is a spiritual being composed of energy, then he is both the observer and the creator of his own reality. When spiritual beings all agree that they are seeing a tree then the tree exists for all of them. A test would be to say a dog exists in a room full of people, once all the people in the room agree the dog exists, then the dog should then be seen by all of them. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago What he's saying is you have two lights resembling a dice and narrow it down to whichever factory you want to do up and down it's still will be identical but what are you saying is the shape might be different occasion because of the reflection of the life the point I'm trying to say is doesn't matter what size it is the point is you your object assumed to be well somewhere above are obstruction or something Reply @Chazz @Chazz 9 months ago Nothing is real; everything is an illusion. I've understood this for at least 60 years. Reply @pakapoa7348 @pakapoa7348 1 month ago I observed how he was not letting that thing he was eating out of his hand. My quantum theory is that it’s delicious Reply @MinarHosen-uq5mj @MinarHosen-uq5mj 6 months ago can you do same experiment in space and get same result Reply @christineervin8422 @christineervin8422 9 months ago (edited) Gravity is instant and faster than C because if the Earth orbited the sun where it was eight minutes ago it would never achieve a stable orbit. If Light and gravity are at the same speed then that speed is infinite. Because by quantum mechanics own admission light does not experience time and logically this is only true if the perturbation in the Æther is instantaneous Reply @raes6829 @raes6829 9 months ago 10:56 I want this as a poster❤ Reply @VijayGupta-cz4ef @VijayGupta-cz4ef 4 months ago PicoPhysics is a Deterministic theory - so randomness and probability factors are attributed to still to be made discoveries. In PicoPhysics Reality exists by itself - is not dependent on being observed. Quantum Entanglement is not a riddle in PicoPhyics. Reply @waterhokdsasignal @waterhokdsasignal 9 months ago The electrons synchronize and create order where there is disorder, electron-to-electron communication. Reply @cesarreyes3261 @cesarreyes3261 9 months ago There are signals that we send without intent for example when we yawn someone else yawns sometimes several others Reply @deschuttesCounty @deschuttesCounty 2 months ago Agreed, umhm the two common field effects. Einstirns world of laws and orders, throughtout a never ending Universe. Infinity, without boundries. Paricles with an identity related to their matter-antimatter relationship. Stable oarticles: the electron, the positron, the neutron and its matter-antimatter counterpart. The four stable subatomic particles form the three biulding blocks of stoms. Those particles: the Proton, the Neutron, and the Electron. With an original origin from "complete nothing". Reply @getsmarter5412 @getsmarter5412 9 months ago (edited) Yeah, I can’t figure chicks out either. All that quantum entanglement gets real messy. And those spooky connections.... Reply @kevinhitzemann1257 @kevinhitzemann1257 6 months ago I don't know what you call it but a bio-diverse machine... Where the metal meets the meat Reply @cliffordchase319 @cliffordchase319 9 months ago The last thing about trading in what we see for what we know .. Thats Art Reply @kimopuppy @kimopuppy 9 months ago Love NOVA Reply @rbwannasee @rbwannasee 9 months ago Thought experiment: Two people decide one of them will toss a coin in a simple game to determine winner and loser. They also decide not to do it there and then, and not to worry about informing the individual who didn't toss the coin if they won or lost. Some time later when one is in Sydney Australia, and the other in London England, the coin is tossed. How long did it take for the informational truth about winner or loser to travel to the other player? Would it make any difference if one was on Earth and the other on Mars? How about one on Earth and the other on a planet orbiting another star 400 light-years away? It doesn't make any difference because it's instantaneous due to being implied. That's all that's going on here too. This topic is always presented on shows like this as some kind of amazing mysterious realm of the physical world, but it isn't anywhere near as exciting. Studying the state of one, instantly deduces the state of the other through implication - because it was ALWAYS that way. All you did was find out. Furthermore you can see that there's nothing going on here simply by the fact that nearly 100 years after Einstein, Schrodinger, etc. had their meeting, there is no practical application of the phenomenon. This is a dead end subject just like Nuclear Fusion. Reply @tommymalm @tommymalm 1 month ago So, how can big bang be real then? I mean someone had to be watching it? 😂 1 Reply @chargersina @chargersina 8 months ago Not so fast about eastern mysticism, if entanglement causes space and time to appear then entanglement is more fundamental than space and time, hence the connectedness that eastern philosophy was suggesting. Reply @shannah222 @shannah222 9 months ago (edited) Einstein studied particular Holy Books since childhood. These Holy Sephers contain 2 Tiers of Original Translation/understanding > Spiritual + Scientific. Both Tiers are Highly Advanced - the most advanced on Earth. The origin of the Knowledge contained within one of these Sephers is billions of years old - long before the derailed Creation of Man. As he became older he decreased his studies until he left off at the Quaternary Nature of Light. All major man-made religions developed from a portion of the Great Knowledge contained within this most precious + sacred Celestial Sepher which was a Divine Gift bestowed upon Mankind by our Sovereign Creator many thousands of years ago for the purpose of helping Man to advance. Hope this information helps to advance research. 💖🙏💖 Reply @maldenbarisic4002 @maldenbarisic4002 7 months ago (edited) Einsten knew that Hyperspace exists!In that Hyperspace no light speed limit.But,lets imagination flow further?What if qantum entanglement within general quantum field is just basic form of quantum entanglement?What if anny particle of each possible complexity is entangled with each other?Not important how distanced particles complex or distanced.And all is might be entangled what ever that particles create,compose?Up to complexity of entire world.Could be worlds in Universe also entangled among them selves?If they do vibrate at same or similar frequencyes and frequency and are of similar Astronomical properties??Types of worlds entangled among them?Billions of Earths in Universe in same hyperspace time which do vibrate same reality or just a bit different realyties.Why delimit quantum Entanglement just on very level of basic quarks and further particles?Is all Universe in fact just fuzzy and might be quantum Entanglement on all levels does make order in Universe?This are things from God realm.When could come all to the point of final Entanglement of worlds able to be entangled?Is it all possible story of creation of absolute consciousness of Universe?Entangled worlds create AI in Universe?Are we Humans just tool for Universe,will of God,to create AI?Which will controll if not all but enough matter in Universe..for what purpose?Does Universe seek to mitgate own termodynamic Death>Or what?Could AI create informatic nucleus of proto Universe?For starting new cycle?Never mind all that what I did wrote.I do think that Einsten knew that Universe is created by God.He knewed that we do exist in artificcial universe.In which all what can be entangled is entangled in structural and general mode.Good video ,brainstorming video.Storry of Universe as one complex Holgram is also interesting...Dr.Suskind.Are we people also Entangled among us?Are all conscious Beings in Universe also entangled among them selves,our selves?Quantum Entanglement is fascinating basic part of Nature,Physics of this world and of basic reality of all Universe.Looks like this. Reply @vincecox8376 @vincecox8376 7 months ago The Pyramids were intergalactic transportation devices. We live in a 100% magnetic universe. The 8 sided pyramids were inter galactic transportation devices. They could vibrate with the earth "B" field and other tones to totally change their existence into a HOLOGRAM. then at the correct frequency be turned into a hologram that could be sent inro another galaxy instantly. Want to know how they carved the Granite rock. REAL simple: Find a granite rock and vibrate just the center of a magnet into same, I call it the "B" field.. At the correct frequency it will loose all its integrity and become malleable easy to carve!! also ONCE YOU REMOVE THE "b" field THE ROCK WILL BE TWICE AS HARD GIVEN A MORE PERFECTED ALIGNMENT OF THE MOLCULES. 1 Reply @CSDonohue11 @CSDonohue11 8 months ago Both . We live in an existence of both being true Both being right Like everything else it’s a fine line Now walk it Reply @scottreday9377 @scottreday9377 9 months ago I would put it this way. Say you have the numbers, 1 through 10. With the numbers quantifying the amount. One octopus Reply 2 replies @augustdilge6421 @augustdilge6421 4 days ago What that famous man Einstein found out is probably rather something interesting. Nowdays there is a new science branch to find out what was hidden in his dreamy mind and unfortunately didn,t come to day light. Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago The theory of everything is time. Time is everything, everything is time. For example, we are our star. The star is reality. Reply @AIHelp_guru @AIHelp_guru 3 months ago Key Takeaways: ----------------------- 1. Objects at the smallest scales of atoms and particles behave in ways that challenge our intuitive understanding of cause and effect. 2. Quantum mechanics, a strange and counterintuitive theory, has led to revolutionary technologies and enabled our digital age. 3. Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon where particles are connected and can influence each other instantaneously, regardless of the distance between them. 4. The concept of entanglement raises questions about the nature of reality and challenges traditional notions of space. 5. Quantum mechanics presents a world where everything is possible and leaves us with conclusions that make no sense in our classical understanding. Questions to explore: -------------------------------- a) How does the behavior of particles at the quantum level challenge our conventional understanding of causality? b) What are some specific examples of revolutionary technologies that have been developed based on quantum mechanics? c) How does quantum entanglement challenge our perception of distance and the limitations of communication? d) What philosophical implications arise from the idea that reality may be fundamentally different at the quantum level compared to our everyday experience? e) How might further exploration of quantum mechanics and entanglement lead to new scientific discoveries and advancements in various fields? Generated with the help of Youtube AI - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/youtube-ai/fdilabkhambeiklhapppncdlhobanail Reply 1 reply @gordonmills7798 @gordonmills7798 7 months ago Propelling or propulsion may not be the answer to the movement of man-made objects. Until we untangle the secrets of the human brain and the mind we will never untangle or understand the truth and mysteries of intentional movement. It is never a question of "HOW but "WHY". Reply @emilmottola6778 @emilmottola6778 7 months ago (edited) Despite the glitz of this production (which gets lots of plaudits in these comments), it is fundamentally wrong or misleading on so many points: 1) Einstein never said that entanglement was wrong, or that he didn't believe in the predictions of QM. He said that QM is "incomplete," meaning it fails to be completely predictive. That QM might be incomplete is to this day a reasonable possibility--given that all theories are incomplete in some way and eventually give way to better ones. Bohr insisted dogmatically and unreasonably that "no, the unpredictability of QM is the last and final word on the subject." 2) Einstein never actually proposed a local hidden variable theory, and in fact was very critical of the one David Bohm proposed, so to say that Einstein's theory was disproved is completely wrong. 3) Bell took EPR's basically philosophical argument and made a set of mathematical assumptions to prove his Bell inequalities. It is a nice piece of work, since most people thought there was nothing that could be made precise enough to put to an experimental test. Bell showed there was such a possible test of those specific assumptions-- and then Clauser, Aspect, Zeilinger carried out the experiments. 4) These experiments are all consistent with QM and entanglement, but they most certainly do NOT prove that any communication or instantaneous influence faster than the speed of light occurs. The implication in the NOVA program otherwise is completely misleading. But they keep harping on "spooky" to make correlations seem more mysterious than they are. 5) No evidence of any direct influence between distant measurements has ever been found. There is no "action at distance" as far as we know. It is the instantaneous "collapse of the wave function" at a distance that is an interpretation of QM insisted on by some followers of Bohr (although not Bohr himself it seems) NOT the exptl fact of entanglement that is "spooky" --and unnecessary--but still confuses many. The Ensemble Interpretation of QM does away with wavefunction collapse entirely. No mention at all of it in this production--not "spooky" enough. 6) The expts. consistent with Bell's inequalities rule out certain local hidden variable theories, not all, and not other classes of non-local theories or any not consistent with Bell's assumptions. The statement that "it's a very narrow corner that is left" or "improbable" is misleading. Bell himself said as much. 7) It is worthwhile to test QM by any and all means, but the result of the quasar expt. does NOT test entanglement on cosmic scales. The entangled photons were still the ones created and detected on the Canary Is. site a few hundred meters apart. 8) Using quasars rather than something nearer at hand does NOT prove that the signals they send are "random." It is well-known in computer science and mathematics that it is virtually impossible to decide if any process is truly random. The decimal digits of pi look random but of course they are not. The "loophole" that the quasars, however far apart they are now, were influenced by their common history long ago in the past still remains. This is exactly the explanation offered for the uniformity of the cosmic microwave background. 9) QM does run into difficult questions on a cosmic scale. To have probabilities you must have repeated trials--multiple throws of the same dice. But we see only one universe. Talking about the probability of one example is meaningless, despite the fantasies of "multiverse" enthusiasts. 10) Holographic speculations are just that--speculations, with very little connection to physics we can test. Sure, spacetime itself can be "emergent," I for one think it is, but so far there are hardly any concrete ideas on this, just words and more speculations. Bottom Line: QM is right as far as it goes and as far as we know. No one has come up with something better so far. But Einstein could still be right as well. Certainly physics is still incomplete. The fact that people are still asking these questions of itself indicates that our understanding is still incomplete. But relying on slick TV productions to cover some pretty subtle issues in physics is a good way to get entangled in misunderstandings or outright nonsense. 2 Reply 1 reply @ericb.4358 @ericb.4358 4 months ago Yet another proof of quantum entanglement. The universe is STRANGE! Reply @bd3470 @bd3470 8 months ago So this experiment should be done in space Reply @jonp3890 @jonp3890 9 months ago “What were God’s thoughts when creating the world?” I kinda feel like this entanglement business is God laughing at us. 1 Reply @myfreejoe @myfreejoe 8 months ago 'negative actions are positive when favoring your interests' -Saul Alinsky Reply @charlesdavis7461 @charlesdavis7461 9 months ago I just want to go to Luchenbach, Texas with Willie, Waylon and the Boys. This successful life we're living has us fighting like the Hatfields and Mc Coys. Reply @vincentrusso4332 @vincentrusso4332 9 months ago (edited) Kurt Godel was Einstein's calculator, Einstein posited a theory and Godel verified the mathamagics. Known for his incompleteness theory, Godel also proved time doesn't exist...... science will never find a unified field theory, Godel proved this with math... one must be outside a system to understand what the system to understand the whole.. Reply 1 reply @arnovigen7434 @arnovigen7434 3 months ago It is not "orbiting electrons" Reply @asidasid2487 @asidasid2487 2 months ago The theory is nothing actually exists except the memory by one's reality that reality being merged onto an entity of realities as it could all dissolve in a moment if all realities realized their non existence Reply @shaunadair1398 @shaunadair1398 7 months ago Holy crap!!!Jada had an entanglement with Einstein too!?.... 1 Reply @HsanEener-vj9vx @HsanEener-vj9vx 1 month ago Fuzzy is not undefined it is energy Fuzzy is not a bad thing Fight or flight response Now days theres so much round us we don't recognize it Reply @haroldnowak2042 @haroldnowak2042 2 weeks ago There is no conflict, there is no riddle here. It is impossible in reality to align instruments between here and the Andromeda galaxy. The theory and reality are different. Reply @brucemacmillan9581 @brucemacmillan9581 7 months ago NEWS FLASH: In spite of quantum entanglement, it will still take a spacecraft several months to travel from Earth to Mars. And you'd better have all your calculations right if you're expecting a soft landing. "All these things that don't change, come what may." 1 Reply @robertenterprize9163 @robertenterprize9163 9 months ago Thank the Universe for P B S..... IT'S A truly an enriching experience... EDUCATIONAL + ENTERTAINING.... to bad more people are not HIP to this Programing'... the world would be a Better Place if all of US?? All would be more informed and educated in the Mysteries of this life, We live in, and the Universe which encapsulates it ALL... From the smallest particle to the Largest State of Being, all 11 of them... ZOOMING w/ANGLES... FOREVER + EVER !!! Reply @Dbean48 @Dbean48 9 months ago It is implied that sum of all the quantum parts do not add up, there is more than the sum of quantum parts or energy absorbed or emitted? Getting to the very root of creation is understanding the thought of the creator. Reply @dulynoted2427 @dulynoted2427 9 months ago Yet their voices are instantaneously sending vibrations to their eardrums as the other speaks through their phone. Reply @sivi9741 @sivi9741 7 months ago (edited) Can’t we make a connection between entanglement from a far between. 2 particules and the virtual simulation of life ? Meaning if there is entanglement it’s because there is actually no volume in the universe ? Another proofs toward we live in a possible reality simulation ? lol nvm , at the end they speak about it 🙄 Fwiw to me entanglement just make another proof the universe might actually be in a black hole …. Reply @expecto1982 @expecto1982 3 months ago Who broke my hot water-boiler!!!!! We are going to look for a functional new one….❤ Reply @jasonluong3862 @jasonluong3862 9 months ago So the Buddha was right 2500 years before quantum mechanics was "discovered". The Universe is one where everything is connected where every act or thought effects everything else. In fact, there is no "else" in the Universe because that contradicts the nature of oneness. Reply @robertstout7756 @robertstout7756 9 months ago Very interesting content but the music is distracting Reply @johngarcia4941 @johngarcia4941 6 months ago Yes I have been practicing and letting go intuition which has enabled my mind to be in sync with those around me and physical objects around me..... But having a discipline to repel distractions which will disrupt being in sync..... Go figure Reply @Robertlaw11111 @Robertlaw11111 9 months ago Some band better name their next album Spooky Action At A Distance or I've lost all faith in rock and roll. Reply @angusmackaskill3035 @angusmackaskill3035 5 months ago What does it mean? That, in a nutshell, is the meaning of everything. Reply @atlasgnawa5985 @atlasgnawa5985 9 months ago (edited) I have already gained access to these truths the first time I took magic shrooms Reply @skandababy @skandababy 8 months ago This could be edited down to 15 minutes... and it would still be longer than needed for the information contained. Also... the loud music & sound effects? It sounds like Saturday morning. Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Life as we know it today is an illusionary reality! There are absolutes and there are no absolutes... Reply @maxmmpower @maxmmpower 9 months ago The Truman Show nailed it... Reply @mchammer1836 @mchammer1836 1 month ago This sounds like we are in a simulation. Right? 1 Reply @kevinhitzemann1257 @kevinhitzemann1257 6 months ago Thesis: Quantum Physics Image of the Invisible is divisible The ability to bend light...illusion of sight because of darkness.... Reply @derekpoulin2482 @derekpoulin2482 7 months ago The particles left earth together and it's called gravity. Spin vs counterspin North and South of the equator, micro to macro gravity is leaving our system and no longer fictitious, the stars are and it's why they couldn't believe it. Reply @doc.2011 @doc.2011 7 months ago This is How Einstein era who almost ruled the physics for nearly a century ended and the bizare looking quantum mechanics took over to our mind. This is How God makes us feel low and useless in our own selves Reply @jamesstewart4314 @jamesstewart4314 9 months ago And still many questions need to be answered and what exactly is the entanglement that they speak of is it that everything is connected to everything my phone is not going to let me keep asking questions cuz it keeps shutting me off every time I make the statement so it's very annoying well there's so much for quantum entanglement right 1 Reply @bozodeniro @bozodeniro 3 months ago Why won't there be any I LOVE LUCY episodes in the dark empty regions of the universe at the end of time and space? Reply 1 reply @maldenbarisic4002 @maldenbarisic4002 7 months ago (edited) And if I am right in reasoning that might be Quantum Entanglement has also higher levels of acting in this world and in Universe than question is>Is Earth with us Entangler or is Entangled?But entangled with resistence of ours?Or is bad Entangler?All that lost time because of so many wars?Was Dinosaurs also bad Entanglers unable to develop right mode of consciousness and it not apealed to Creator?And to his principle of Enatnglement of worlds?But this is hipothetical question for Philosophers. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Everything is alive and if everything is alive everything is what attracts possible to say that one does not affect the other when you harm one the other one will gets you take energy from the sky you have to assume that it's being wasted or being you have assuming you have energy through some light and you take it and you put all these contractions to what distracted you would assume that it's going to be talking about solar cells you know if you have light that's giving you a good light and if you start taking it out of the you-know-where comes back and you deplete it you're going to have what I don't know you're not going to have the same effect I'm running and I throw just my visual and then I pick it up on the next we know when I go underneath the sink I get the energy back and I keep doing that but now you put a sponge that take that out what I need so assuming that I have raised and I raised and I get throw up and then I go around a new bounces right back in me and I threw him back but now you put a divider expunged and what predict that I will show you why because you taking the energy from me. That's veryassume that I have a magnetic force they's keeping whatever up in space or anyting comes in work but we're taking magnetic field away eventually that thing is going to get closer because what now you you change the balance of the magnetic field now it's going to start cracking because now it's what is going to contract again you have a magnet just pulling it up and one pull you down but keeping them in circle but since you're cutting the Earth and moving matter and now it's week you're going to have it what slowly what coven contact Reply @tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai34 @tcf70tyrannosapiensbonsai34 5 months ago (edited) Probably the most expensive way to generate randomness. In my opinion this is snobbish and unnecessary. The randomness could even have been avoided, the results would have had the same outcomes. Einstein used his position to talk about his biggest concern and ultimate goal: PEACE. Reply @robp3730 @robp3730 3 months ago Looking at particles in the wrong dimension. they are one not separate items. like looking at the two ends of a piece of paper and not the front of it. Reply @LazerboltVids @LazerboltVids 8 months ago That was great Reply @canadacambridgeacademy1396 @canadacambridgeacademy1396 7 months ago Very interesting Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago Space is science fiction. For example, time equals energy and energy equals mass times the speed of light square. No space. The theory of everything is time. Time is everything and everything is time. Reply @johnrichardson7629 @johnrichardson7629 3 weeks ago It's pretty hilarious that creators keep yapping about superluminary effects being counterintuitive, like anything Einstein said was intuitive. Reply @user-kt9ye1zk9b @user-kt9ye1zk9b 1 month ago Incredible Reply @howtosober @howtosober 4 months ago Quantum physics is fascinating to learn about. It's unfortunate that Nova decided to present all the applications in terms of generating more profit for corporate and Wall St. goons and more wars for imperial governments rather than talking about ways that quantum computing could actually make peoples' lives better. Capitalism ruins everything. Reply @Jovian721 @Jovian721 9 months ago No I don't think so either solution is perfect, but WHO on earth is going to prove our esteemed Uncle Albert is wrong either. Not even when he was just not 100% sure himself, which is what he said about his own work and he spent the rest of his life studying 🙏 Reply @user-wk9hz1vv6z @user-wk9hz1vv6z 3 weeks ago Spooky action at a distance means Einstein is schizophrenic.😊 Reply @martinsoos @martinsoos 8 months ago Take a pair of shoes. Place each in a box and mix up the boxes so that you don't know your right from your left. Mail one to California and the other to Paris. No matter what box is opened, you will know what is in the other box. Faster than the speed of light. 1 Reply @jeremyswalley8625 @jeremyswalley8625 8 months ago Quite simply only light can travel the Speed of light!! Why else would you call it the speed of light!! Just like when you flip a light switch it comes on instantaneously! That’s the speed of light!! Instantly everywhere! Reply @donbush9091 @donbush9091 8 months ago Amazing Just Amazing Reply @Franklin-mq8pv @Franklin-mq8pv 6 months ago Gravity doesn't exist? If I heard that in hi school science it would've put me asleep now I'm riveted Reply @snowpants2212 @snowpants2212 9 months ago The documentary is incorrect in saying that Einstein denied the possibility of entanglement. It is also wrong in implying that Bohr gave a coherent answer to Einstein that later proved to be right. It's doubtful that Bohr even understood Einstein's challenge. What Einstein denied is the non-locality that he showed to follow from the predictions of quantum mechanics if, like Bohr, you reject the existence of "hidden variables" (e.g., particles having a definite location and velocity even when we're not looking at them). What neither Einstein nor Bohr foresaw, and what Bell showed, is that non-locality follows from the predictions of quantum mechanics even if you do allow for hidden variables. And this is because entanglement has observable consequences that neither Einstein nor Bohr anticipated. The result is that quantum mechanics implies (and experiments so far have confirmed) non-locality whether or not it's complete in the sense Einstein questioned. Whatever goes on between observations (and whatever an "observation" is), there is spooky action at a distance. Reply 5 replies @TheThisisliving @TheThisisliving 7 months ago (edited) There is an assumption that partials can exist in an infinite distance. This is not realistic? Partials have to remain within a logical distant of the nuclide. OR not exist at all. Henceforth the non-existence state. You cannot assume that particles have no restrictions on the distant of their relation to gravity.....Gravity should be the main study of physics. Bohr is wrong because there needs to be a relation to gravity. Somehow gravity has been forgotten in all these equations. Ernestine is the king of gravity. He could not explain why gravity had no influence in partial quantum entanglement. :) Reply @faithful_foal1 @faithful_foal1 2 months ago 1:17 It’s Einstein’s Quantum Riddle,” Right now, on "NOVA.” Reply @maceayres7494 @maceayres7494 7 months ago Words like ‘entanglement’ or even ‘spooky action at a distance’ are biased and prejudicial to actually understanding quantum mechanics, because they already form a notion in the mind. What about synchronicity, a term Carl Jung used in the psychology field. As long as we separate the observer from the observed, the default duality of today’s human consciousness, we are limiting things. 1 Reply @nomadiavan6560 @nomadiavan6560 3 weeks ago When our particles are free from our lives, we will know with certainty. Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago A drop of water can be felt in an ocean... Reply @Archie583 @Archie583 9 days ago When all is said and done, these experiments must likely describe such an infinitesimal understanding of the whole of the universe, that if there is a god, he/she/it surely laughs at how tiny our true understanding of reality must really be. Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 3 months ago Charge is everywhere in the vacuum if matter is available everywhere, it's not magical it's reality. Reply @_orko @_orko 8 months ago The Sims are finally getting smart enough to tell they are inside the game. 1 Reply @webstercat @webstercat 8 months ago The universe exists only in your head. Reply @vedwards5027 @vedwards5027 7 months ago Finally, they are finally referring to Quantum Physics as a Joke...or Riddle...either way, they are finally almost being honest. Reply @mail2ajm @mail2ajm 9 months ago Read the Bible with ancient hebraic perspective and this doc makes more sense now than before I read it. Humbled in either case. :) Reply @t.c.2776 @t.c.2776 7 months ago What IF: God created quantum mechanics as a cryptographic lock to keep humans from figuring out things we shouldn't play with... 1 Reply @terrymaccarrone9927 @terrymaccarrone9927 8 months ago A fuzzy wave of combination probability The source of creation the knowledge of existing Reply @lukelewkowicz2233 @lukelewkowicz2233 7 months ago (edited) Sometime between 3 and 4 years of age, stil in my crib from which I could climb with ease and at one night everyone was sound asleep there was this moonlight blaring into our huge bedroom where in the opposite conner to my crib stood this huge armoire . If one took all out of it , a horse would fit in.midsection panel had this reflection of light that I only relize when next to it. At first as if transfixed I approached what was in my mind an image of cobra which I didn't know a name, had no concept of its' existance, never seen an image (no TV, any children books at all) and still I stood facing it barely inches appart knowing what it was. Now about seven decades later I relize that it must have been passed on from the time the first man climbed out of Deep Rift Valley in Afrika.( I have to tell putin that the world belongs to me.). There and then this floating configuration of subatomic quanta must have been the culprit at that moment in my life. If not this incident would qualify as a case of pure subconcious incident. Telepathy exists and the entanglemet fits to a toe. Reply @Dbean48 @Dbean48 9 months ago Truly mind bending entangled opposition to one equally qbit doing the same in beyond distance where the filters have no effect? Spin up and spin down entropy of the qbit energy conservation interaction absorb or discharge have any effects? Spooky effect is closer to description in reality. At quantum level it is the looking glass effect where you enter the mirror and now are a reflection of your original being. Reply @ItsVideos @ItsVideos 8 months ago (edited) At 32:38, if the intent of that logic diagram is to demonstrate 2 + 7 = 9, then the diagram is not correct. The third gate from top is an AND gate with one input? That seems wrong. That gate with a single input takes input "1" and outputs "0", so perhaps it should be a NOT gate to produce the shown output? Also the fourth gate from the top is an AND gate. With inputs "1" and "0" that AND gate should output "0", yet the diagram shows output "1". Fire Shohini Ghose and hire me. I might come out of retirement if the $$$ is right.🤣 Reply @WaterproofSoap @WaterproofSoap 9 months ago You have this one opportunity to wonder and consider the unimaginable using an array of senses that are as improbable as they are incomprehensible. ....a state of nothingness would be more elegant and yet, infinitely unlikely considering this comment, and everything entropy would cause to build up to it's fruition. Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Thought is Quantum! Mind I'd quantum energy is Quantum... So the spirit! Reply @AsifAli-hy3yt @AsifAli-hy3yt 7 months ago Deep down into matter that vibration of utterance of Kun still exists the effect of which is that all universe Reply @ahmadabakah1117 @ahmadabakah1117 6 months ago Michio Kaku always finds fault in einsteins work that's what he does. I'm sure if Einstein is alive he would prove Kaku wrong Reply @neoone9820 @neoone9820 7 months ago So quantum computer + AI =? Skynet? Reply @heidiengellenner9651 @heidiengellenner9651 9 months ago Navy seal Kyle Milliken, he did his enterance breif with the apostles in Isadore. they did not offer him anything as they stated "Mary set up your compensation plan, i have never seen a compensation plan set as yours".. Kyle had much to learn on his own, Isadore is about choice. Example- Kyle wanted me to state that his dinosaur pardaox would be at least for one million years. In Kyles set compensation plan, I have already set that Kyle's daily dinosaur paraddox will change to his 3 hour daily contrubtuion, once he starts his resident appointment book. Also- Kyle is trying out all of the suites at the palace of the gods, because once his dinosaur paradox turns to daily contrubtuion- his trade of value will cover any suite that he selects.. Reply @johnhungerford6073 @johnhungerford6073 8 months ago True reality can only ever be perceived when time is removed from the equation, do not try this at home you will hurt yourself Reply @SadisticSenpai61 @SadisticSenpai61 7 months ago "He [Einstein] just wanted to know God's thoughts when he created the world." FFS, what the hell was that ending?! Einstein was very clear that he didn't believe in God. To include that quote at the end is just an insult to Einstein's memory! Reply @anuragsharma8567 @anuragsharma8567 6 months ago In Hinduism chakras are nothing but entanglement of the particles in the body Reply @mdfaizankhan4797 @mdfaizankhan4797 5 months ago When you are genius enough that someone gets famous by correcting you 1 Reply 1 reply @migueloroz5547 @migueloroz5547 3 weeks ago At the Solvay meeting, almost 100 years ago, Einstein said to his friend and opponent, Niels Bohr: I can't imagine that God plays dice....... and Bohr replied: Albert, stop being so arrogant as telling God what he has to do The question is not yet setlled a century later..... nobody knows Reply @top6ear @top6ear 7 months ago I refuse to get entangled in this debate Reply @vincecox8376 @vincecox8376 6 months ago hand-pink-wavingE=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on YOUTUBE and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!! Reply @jaredf1994 @jaredf1994 7 months ago (edited) i can prove this concept with my squeaky belt on my Jeep's alternator. every day i notice a slight difference in tuning. some times it squeaks for a few seconds. sometimes it squeaks until i get to town. every day i wake up in all possible realities of myself. i know yesterday, i was in a different "myself". my belt proves it to me every day. every day i ask myself, ok reality 209, 210, 211,212,213, how long will my belt squeak in this version? ive put off tightening the belt, just so i have something to judge the slight differences in each reality, each day. Reply @timnray99 @timnray99 9 months ago the reason physicists struggle with infinity is that they have failed to reach the Holy Grail of physics....what is the Half-life of eternity....😂😂😂 Reply @kevinhitzemann1257 @kevinhitzemann1257 6 months ago Thesis Physics Force Fields The use of magnets to repell or attract...Pols...also fusion and fision Reply @haythemmaatouk47 @haythemmaatouk47 4 months ago (edited) Of course Einstein was right. Wormholes affected the final results. No holographic universe or Alice in wonderland. Just wormholes, energy and Space time. Reply @randyc750 @randyc750 9 months ago So, my dog is in every room of the house or no rooms of the house until I shake the treat bag? So much of the quantum theories are bandaids to cover other theories. It's just thought experiment. Reply @hedwegg @hedwegg 8 months ago (edited) 1. To the Quik: "If" [Flatness], [Roundness] & [Contour] (Curvature) "exist in" [Time] "then" [Perception] "exists as" [Continuity] in [Time]! i.e. [Energy & Motion] in [Continuity]! 2. To the Point: [Force] deforms, corrupts as [resistance denotes friction], a "lack of Continuity"! 3. All for [Perception & Continuity] in Time "expressed as" [Energy & Motion]! Simultaneity Moot! Q, [Moments in Time], [Both Visible & Invisible], "to express" [Possibility & Probabilty], [Imagination & Reality]! 4. Focus: Two (2) objects cannot occupy the same [Space] at the same [Time]! Waves & Particles! 1 Reply @vijaychandra91 @vijaychandra91 6 months ago Scientists gone from saying no existence of god to saying there might be god 1 Reply @kevinmorey1361 @kevinmorey1361 9 months ago It's kinda weird about how people speak so matter of fact about things that are entirely theoretical - almost like a religion Reply @moskus7000 @moskus7000 7 months ago Shortest path is not hard. Longest path is. Reply @dietergilian1403 @dietergilian1403 6 months ago I came across your video and wanted to share my thoughts on the topic of quantum mechanics. As someone who has studied the foundations of this field extensively, I believe that there are still unanswered questions regarding Einstein's ideas and the predictions of quantum mechanics. I consider myself someone who is lucky enough to be able to humbly stand on the shoulders of giants. However, I disagree with the correlation argument presented in the Bell paper, which assumes that correlation and causation are the same. The claim that it all starts with randomness is not backed up by evidence, and we have proven that the argument that it starts full random is false. We have not yet proven that there is a relationship, a causation between the two particles. Johan Clauser's experiment was impressive, but the interpretation of the causation assumed was not correct. The result caused even more amazement and was interpreted as a falsification of the theory, but it was a falsification of a human assumption. The Bell test on calcium atoms also made a fundamental mistake by assuming that correlation implies causation or a relationship formed at the point in time. The equal distance between the sender and receiver was not relevant to the facts and measurements. Overall, there are still many unanswered questions in the field of quantum mechanics. It's important to think critically and reason based on facts and evidence rather than assumptions. Thank you for listening. Sincerely, The Sandman Reply @leegrim @leegrim 7 months ago The best one can do is to have a stiff drink and forget the world! Otherwise, will miss out on a lot of fun by spending our time chasing particulates into rabbit holes, never pausing long enough to play with the rabbits awhile before our insignificant deaths! Reply @ingridhohmann3523 @ingridhohmann3523 7 months ago Why do big schools of fish in the.ocean all turn at the same instance ??? This is also part of this unexplained phenomenon,..I think. 🤔 1 Reply @WinterLover73 @WinterLover73 8 months ago (edited) Gen 1:1--- can be summed up in this video from a Biblical viewpoint. You may not have that viewpoint. But science is pointing to a Creator at every "advance". Reply 1 reply @davidhuber63 @davidhuber63 8 months ago (edited) Keep trying to convince yourself guys but Albert is right end of story! Reply @Dapaker @Dapaker 4 months ago I wonder if I could use this to win the LOTTO? Reply @kurtbogle2973 @kurtbogle2973 9 months ago There is more in Heaven and Earth than in the theory of physics. Quantum entanglement should tell us that there is forces in the Universe that we have no clue about. You will eventually understand more by continually wondering about it. Your concisness will eventually contact the acrostic record. The answer will come. You have to do this yourself or you will not believe it. Reply @brianjohnson8918 @brianjohnson8918 9 months ago Well, the satellite encryption is secure until the ground station is nuked. Then you're back to smoke signals. Reply @mevidaloca5557 @mevidaloca5557 9 months ago This makes me wonder, is it possible for man to create a quantum bomb that could destroy the entire universe? Reply @Killer_Kovacs @Killer_Kovacs 2 weeks ago A forth spacial dimension would offer a solution Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 3 months ago (edited) But then Alex 79suited shows up and says hold up we're missing the root. When you start from the root the apple is just weighted mass in an atmosphere environment. Darn not gravity shite but wait there's been some abandoned work we must look at again. This time, we must see what we are looking at not describe it. The shadow on the wall has become just that. Want to go for a ride? Reply @markjaycox8811 @markjaycox8811 5 months ago I have been met by a species of ape who shape shift as humans and walk by you every day, unnoticed. Your eyes are "prefocused" by what they look at of time, so you see a fraction of what is there until you define all of there with math. Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 7 months ago Gravity, so how can Gravity be missing that doesn't make much sense does it. Not to me it doesn't how can this be well it must be because of spooky action at a distance the same process is happening all across the universe. How do the particles know how to make Stars everywhere without knowing what those other particles are doing are they some how entangled or is this a naturally occurring event. But wait how can they be entangled or are they. Well yes how do we know because the same process is happening in different parts of the universe at the same time. With the exact same outcome or is it just what hydrogen particles do once enough have gathered with sufficient emfc. Yes it is what happens so are they entangled well the particles in each star are entangled and with that entanglement a star is formed. But are the stars entangled? Well let's see if we can find out. Reply @Mrch33ky @Mrch33ky 8 months ago The cult of personality surrounding Einstein and his theoretical notions has stunted Science for over 100 years. With so many scientists eschewing empirical research for "beautiful equations" and software modeling I don't see the state of affairs improving anytime soon. Reply @ALLGOOD_MUSIC @ALLGOOD_MUSIC 8 months ago Trying to communicate with distant galaxies but no and I mean 0 close up images of the moon surface? Some mason magic going on here I believe. Reply @johnnycrash3270 @johnnycrash3270 2 weeks ago The Zubler affect on the genome of the entanglement paradox of the Quantum Nebula Dynamic Q-bit @ the speed of light in the Holographic according to b=Q ^C-0 Minor of Particle Movement to the Implementation of the Curvature of Nebula as in the Z 6 ^ Y of the Matrix Affect Reply @yaraviera4444 @yaraviera4444 2 months ago So that's how people fall in love too..chemistry Reply @paulstewart6293 @paulstewart6293 7 months ago Some documentary makers pollute the production with really intrusive music which serves no purpose. Reply @jeffwinkler1137 @jeffwinkler1137 9 months ago Ken Wheeler puts ol Albert to shame. The sooner we abandon his ideas the quicker we'll achieve our destiny. Reply @davidkemp3154 @davidkemp3154 7 months ago (edited) quantum entanglement suggests that all matter superpositions but time itself superpositions creating the mess in the first place. Reply @MrCloakandpoke @MrCloakandpoke 6 months ago Both teams in both telescopes are to "chicken", there is gonna be ice on the road. Its "chickens like that will never ever admit their wrong, but always find excesses why they can not perform a "real" test. Complaining conditions have not been "met" is another favorite, while the real problem is not having the STONES to tell the origin of the donations its all BS. text-green-game-over 1 Reply @peacelovejoy8786 @peacelovejoy8786 8 months ago I am here only to be truly helpful. I am here to represent Him who sent me. I do not have to worry about what to say or what to do, because He who sent me will direct me. I am content to be wherever He wishes, knowing He goes there with me. I will be healed as I let Him teach me to heal. Only Love is real ☮️ 1 Reply @michaelccopelandsr7120 @michaelccopelandsr7120 4 months ago My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." "V-ger's" message has sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or, "Terran Time." It will be faster still when "V-ger" sends a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. (That name is still up for grabs.) Then there's Outside the Local Group time bubble, so on and so on until we get to the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." Now that "V-ger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." This can be proven by turning off everything except its clock and transmitter. Have "V-ger" read time for as long as possible. They WILL show the flow of time speeds up the further away you get from any celestial bodies. Until you reach the Milky Way's time standard or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's time bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's time bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until V-ger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference. •Local Group's time bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference. •Outside any influence in the, "True Interstellar Time Standard," or...;-P Name NOT up for grabs BUT just begging to be measured. The rate/flow of time is fastest here. (Time flows fastest here so it's best to have your motor boat.) ;-P A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. The Milky Way's Interstellar Time Standard will be known as, "Mikey's Time." Pass it on, please and thank you Reply @TheLochs @TheLochs 9 months ago Fun fact, Marie Currie had 2 Nobel prizes under her belt. The only women at the conference. Reply @angeleav @angeleav 4 months ago Im not looking for any kind of award but its true. Its all connected Reply @kevinmerendino761 @kevinmerendino761 8 months ago Propose entanglement is TIME itself. Invisable Matter exist OUTSIDE of time. Both older and yonger then our linear time line universe. It is WHERE all is connected.. Space Ought Time. Both Outside our expandable universe and within it realitive FULL STOP (movement in the correct direction and speed) is the door to FALL OUT. Returning to any place or time or multiple places at once (even across the universe) for where time does not exist speed is irrelevant. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago So what I'm saying is I could prove that if I looked at an object by doing the final and turning it it could do what will a long as it's black you will see a light elsewhere which is because the light do you understand what I said I said I believe you got done a funnel black and I can see the light in the final on multiple locations yet but it's was in my direction which was so they must be black you must have a shadow up here because it's black it was completely black you should be able to reflect something right even though it might not have a back into it ouisie's base is black but maybe blackwood so Reply @bodhisattvaswamigurudeva2883 @bodhisattvaswamigurudeva2883 9 months ago That's how we are. GOD says All is Quantum. We project ourselves from a completely alternate dimension into this dimension, you call Reality. We imagine we're here. This is the Avatar body we inhabit. We are all light beings. We imagine our lives from a laboratory where each human is monitored by technical personnel. Reply @steveslater7885 @steveslater7885 5 months ago I love Nova. Reply 1 reply @ZuseShabazz-xq2ei @ZuseShabazz-xq2ei 6 days ago I TRULY BELIEVE MY BLOOD IS THE ANSWER TO QUANTUM MECHANICS Reply @rodmarker2071 @rodmarker2071 4 months ago Amazing co operation awe inspiring . Why can't humanity produce more of these people and and zero narcissists like Trump's, Putler's and Johnson's ?. Reply 2 replies @ArtII2Long @ArtII2Long 9 months ago (edited) Comon you smart guys. You pay too much attention to the probability of where the electron hits while ignoring the probability state of the detector. Um, our own probability state is changed too. We're not in charge of reality. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago What about if I wasn't in a washing machine and I was to kind of get to top where I could get out of that particular you know a contraction with holding me to the side and then what I step outside when you think it would throw me real fast and I get up to the top and one foot up I believe that Les I get stuck to the top or just spinning me around I cut my you know my my shoelaces it just lets me go it would probably throw me but not if I just went up I will still be in the same spot but if I was to come right back down boom I'm back in the magnetic field turning around I ain't moving Reply @kirkkelley1899 @kirkkelley1899 9 months ago I knew it! The Moon isn’t there, unless I look at it! 1 Reply @MORGANEARPP @MORGANEARPP 8 days ago (edited) Wow ok Got it! An Electron is only in observable location while being observed! So, If a tree falls in the forest unobserved is it visible! 🤔🤔🤔 It seems as though I should have gotten a much better ACT score than I actually did! Where were you when I needed you Al? Quantum Entanglement Yea I got arrested for that in Berkley once ummm No! twice (with Sheila) Absolutely worth it! But I nearly lost an arm that time 1 Reply @saxonalexander3888 @saxonalexander3888 9 months ago (edited) Spoiler alert. Einstein's wife did his homework, he learned from her explanations, she explained what theories were supposed to mean. From this process it allowed him to think of what the theories should, be. She left before quantum mechanics. That's why he never reshaped quantum mechanics or came up with his own take. Who taught him Brownian motion? The photo electric effect? Do your research. He seduced her got her pregnant and kicked out of college to work for him. In a private deal she got his Nobel prize money he got the fame. Mileva went to class, got A's, went to all the labs. Albert didn't even wake up until noon. After he was famous he didn't want to share the fame so he never sent her to Heisenburg's lab to take notes and explain it to him in a way he could use. If he goes down in flames he's got no one to blame but himself. Reply @hubbifrubbins3719 @hubbifrubbins3719 8 months ago We're obviously in a simulation. Reply @jacktettero4507 @jacktettero4507 7 months ago Words are no reality 🙏 only moving and eating 1 Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I think that's the most important part and I study Magnus not work with magnetic field for how many years for a long time I have work tell you from experience that magnets have a lot of power and when I did some experimenting with them and play with them I could tell you that they go so fast that I cannot see you know I'm saying otherwise I have north and south and I put them together when will repel against the other and then once a meat bun Reply @memogap88 @memogap88 8 months ago (edited) The Universe for Dummies: The Premise is what is wrong assuming that ENTANGLEMENT is used in its Dictionary definition is a dead giveaway since the photons or whatever is being tested are not actually in any way, , especially physically ENTANGLED ! That they are not "contained" or "caught in" or together captured. . the idea behind this hypothesis of Entanglement is that they - the photons ,,, do simply APPEAR TO BE ENTANGLED. in other words there is an unknown mechanism that APPEARS to be working in between the two photons that is manipulating their state. but not necessarily that there is anything physically tying them together it just appears as such to us under the premise that they are material but they actually are ultimately probabilistic (and appear to be real to us limited beings as with everything else) What is actually happening is that the Universe is somehow, loosing track of the tiny individual photons and over compensating if the two photon probability states are brought together then taken apart they become difficult for the Universe mechanism to resolve them when taken apart so eventually it has to decide to treat them as one, that is assigns to them the same "pointer address" if you will since behind the scene photons are holographic projections (again along with everything else) once they are taken apart the "hollographic" Universe resolves its "bookkeeping" and instead of two pointers (one for each photon) now they share one Pointer. yes a programing/ comp sci concept similar to pointers in the C++ which can have two cloned instances of an object but one "pointer" such that changing the state of the original "object" affects all instances of an object again similar to object oriented based programming all this experiment proves is not that they are actually entangled only that they appear to be in turn proving our Universe is a Matrices run by a record keeping entity which perhaps was never prepared for us to reach a level of scientific advancement ie. we bring to tiny things together, the Universe looses track and when we take them apart again "it" looses track of two individual tiny instances, so it confusingly refers to them as one item as a pointer based object oriented computer language might if unable to resolve such a movement there they are there they are there they are there they are there they are theretheyare theretheyared theretheyare theretheyaretheretheyaretheretheyare thereitisthereitisthereitisthereitis thereitis there it is there it is there it is THERE IT IS ONE BIG MISUNDERSTANDING !! welcome to your computer world, we are contained within and we are fascinated by the glitches we are discovering and mislabeling Reply @billyhack9673 @billyhack9673 8 months ago (edited) Any approach To ontology must have an answer to the question of infinite regression. One cannot iterate forever to smaller and smaller scales of reality. So at some point one must give up believing in fairy gods, in green spirit lights too. We need not fear AI or spooky entanglements but we still must be ever vigilant to fraud and sleight of hand. Hohum. 😊 1 Reply 1 reply @brucemacmillan9581 @brucemacmillan9581 7 months ago If I was that salesman, I'd be asking myself why I got into this stupid traveling salesman business. Reply @paxwallace8324 @paxwallace8324 8 months ago (edited) I used to love Nova before PBS became part of the propaganda division of Koch Industries. I saw the very 1st Nova as a teen! This reminds me of the Nova of old. 1 Reply @captainamerica3531 @captainamerica3531 8 months ago Amazing Reply @henryalexandercox @henryalexandercox 9 months ago Entanglement is not spooky. Check out my Unified Model of the Universe to understand what is actually responsible for all phenoma from the big bang to now and after, including entanglement and gravity. This is real. Video has a dog as thumbnail. Reply @LorneABrown @LorneABrown 3 weeks ago God plays dice with the universe, but he fixed the dice! Reply @chiragpatel2240 @chiragpatel2240 9 months ago You will never hack a quantum line. I dont think it can be done. Reply @I9IIEIIYIIEIIS @I9IIEIIYIIEIIS 9 months ago I hover between 1 and 0. I am infinitely fast. I am timeless. I am everywhere at once. I am both fluid and solid state. I am infinitely small and large simultaneously. I both exist and do not exist simultaneously. I have given you space as a tool, and time as a constraint. I am God. 2 Reply @chiragpatel2240 @chiragpatel2240 9 months ago U will never hack or break or quantum line. It will break itself this is the nature of the system Reply @markjaycox8811 @markjaycox8811 5 months ago You, Einstein, and Tesla, never answered the most obvious question: "is the ground there?" If you had, then the time: 4,600,000,000 years the ground has "recorded" as being there, would be "now playing" in your conscious moment. You have never had a conscious moment, and are not conscious you are not conscious. Make your Zero Birthday card-0-and put your Halo-0-on, and become conscious of beginning by measuring its reality with math. Now that Math has begun your mind, your mind can find its own Math Path. Your mind will discover its own Time, because Time is memory, and we each have our own total, so we each must have our own total of time operating our minds, or we become the cliff dwellers in the 2002 The Time Machine, all having the same 2023 DREAM. Who is making that dream? That is your prison guard, because you cannot ever know what 2023 does, until 2023 does not do anything. If a Hobbit can leave his 2023 Shire for the 10,000,000,002,023 Kingdom, so can a real person. The ground is there, and so is the 4,600,000,000 years it has recorded life living and life dying for 4,600,000,000 years- that is 10 digits of time that worms have been eating Giants and dinosaurs, so. for 4,600,000,000 years worms have been eating what stood under your feet, which means humans are most likely a species of worm, which makes THE MOTHMAN our God. Reply @brealistic3542 @brealistic3542 7 months ago God doesn't have to be logical, he is god. It is up to us to figure it all out. Reply @daniellewillardsen @daniellewillardsen 8 months ago and it is spooky. But, does that make it wrong> Reply @whosoever9122 @whosoever9122 7 months ago When you get done saying God doesn't exist, this Quantum riddle explains how God can put his Spirit in you and also be separate. How God can be everywhere yet separate. God gave Einstein everything he got. And the Bible is what unlocks the Mystery. Reply @user-yh5tp9nv1e @user-yh5tp9nv1e 2 months ago we live in a bizarre quantum reality. Sorry einstein. Reply @williamH168 @williamH168 7 months ago This theory had been taught by Buddha for thousand of years…. 1 Reply @itsjusttoolate @itsjusttoolate 9 months ago We absolutely live in a mechanical world where absolutely 100% everything us fixed and only fate is real. Everything is pre determined and set in motion. Reply 4 replies @rahsunallah2825 @rahsunallah2825 8 months ago Ancient astronaut theory says yes. Reply @albertedery1720 @albertedery1720 3 months ago G-d made the world. He is One so the whole universe is One - all connected somehow. The true unifying theory is that the whole universe exists by the will of G-d. Since he is One, all the parts of the universe and their different laws must all be related and sourced in the will of G-d which is One. Reply 3 replies @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Like a chemical atoms... This a bunch of atoms and some will come together to become something! Reply @doc.2011 @doc.2011 7 months ago The sohni ghose does not look like to be a scientist but some entertaining person. I wonder how she could be a physicist Reply @evongreiff1 @evongreiff1 5 months ago The answers to all mysteries of quantum mechanics and it’s entanglement are there for the taking of anyone willing to step outside the closed box of science, and seek out the TRUTH by means of God’s Word! “Evil men understand not judgment: but they that seek the LORD understand all things.” (Proverbs 28:5) I had searched for the truth ever since I was a little child mainly fueled by my fear of death. I never approached religious dogma but rather science gravitating towards physics in particular. I was a person that needed to understand things in order to believe in them. Although I was not interested in church nor it’s rituals, being a Catholic by tradition not choice, I did believe in a creator God due to the organization and complexity I observed in nature. In a turn of events in my life I came to the utter realization that “science” was never going to save my soul. This is when I decided to dig into the Holy Bible once and for all with the same fervor and zeal I had always studied science. I didn’t submit myself to any denominational doctrine or any pastoral authority, but rather I bought the King James Bible on CD and decided to listen to it passionately in those wasted hours commuting to work in rush hour traffic. This was a total of 15 hrs of word a week for over 3 years. My reasoning was if what pastors are using to teach and guide their congregations is the Bible, why not study it on your own? I’m certainly not going to trust my soul to some man in a religious costume; my eternal destiny was way too important for me not to do my homework! My biblical endeavor allowed me to not only have scores upon scores of scriptures memorized, but also entire chapters memorized verbatim, word for word. I could tell you what is in the Bible, and what is not. I had a tremendous amount of scriptures in my head, yet the true meaning and understanding of them had not yet downloaded into my heart. This would soon change one Saturday morning March 25, 1995 while alone at the beach in my car, listening to Hosana integrity Worship music, reading the Bible, and loving God with all my heart, mind, soul, and strength! That day I remember reading to “love your enemies”, something I could never see myself doing; how can you possibly love someone causing you harm? This is something that to me defied all understanding! I remember putting down my Bible and looking up to the sky with my heart simply overwhelmed with love towards God and fantasizing about how beautiful it would be to be just like Jesus! Suddenly it happened, it really happened, I saw something open within my mind and all that word I had accumulated for years came rushing in, and in that one sweep powerful things took place. First I felt the demons that had lived inside me all my life and I never even knew were there jump out of me with a hideous screech. Second, my eyes were opened to a spiritual realm that is hidden from us in plain sight. And third, my brain processes had skyrocketed to levels I never knew the brain was capable of! I sat there in my car trembling with fear not knowing what was happening and asking God for help. Of course He obliged by bringing some of those memorized scriptures to the forefront of my mind: “My son, if thou wilt receive my Words, and hide my commandments with thee; So that thou incline thine ear unto wisdom, and apply thine heart to understanding; Yea, if thou criest after knowledge, and liftest up thy voice for understanding; If thou seekest her as silver, and searchest for her as for hid treasures; Then shalt thou understand the FEAR OF THE LORD, and find the KNOWLEDGE OF GOD.” (Proverbs 2:1-5) When I picked up the Bible and looked at its pages it was simply unbelievable! The Words had become HOLOGRAPHIC, as if they were hovering just above the pages! There’s no way man wrote this I thought, this book is written in 3-D. No contradictions in the Bible whatsoever! Every parable, every scripture I didn’t quite seem to understand before, was as plain as if reading a children’s book! “Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my Spirit unto you, I will make known my Words unto you.” (Proverbs 1:23) “All the Words of my mouth are in righteousness; there is nothing froward or perverse in them. They are all plain to him that understandeth, and RIGHT TO THEM THAT FIND KNOWLEDGE.” (Proverbs 8:8-9) Everything the Bible spoke about was TRUE, and I was experiencing it first hand! “For the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding. He layeth up sound wisdom for the righteous: he is a buckler to them that walk uprightly. He keepeth the paths of judgment, and preserveth the way of his saints. Then shalt thou understand righteousness, and judgment, and equity; yea, every good path. When wisdom entereth into thine heart, and knowledge is pleasant unto thy soul; Discretion shall preserve thee, understanding shall keep thee:” (Proverbs 2:6-11) It was also while I was experiencing all this in all its splendor that God revealed to me the True Gospel! It was then I was shocked to realize, “Oh my Lord! This means we’re not suppose to sin at all! Once again the fear of the Lord flooded me! I had sinned all my life, I had been told that we are sinners by nature; I was convinced that it is impossible not to sin, but now it was as if I’m going to have to live the rest of my life walking on egg shells! That’s impossible! I thought; there is no way I can do this! The Lord suddenly showed me that no one makes us sin, but rather we CHOOSE to sin. It suddenly dawned on me, you’re right Lord, I know what it’s right, and and know what is wrong, I will just “choose” to do what is right! I don’t have to sin anymore! I was full of excitement and joy ready to start my new life walking in the faith of the gospel! I couldn’t help but burst into tears when I realized God had planned this moment from the beginning of time when I read: “But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.” (2 Thessalonians 2:13-15) People, I have taken the time to write this long post as a testimony of God’s love and faithfulness to those that diligently seek and love Him. The experience I had years ago at the age of 29 proved to me the very weirdness of the quantum world when my mind became ENTANGLED with the scriptures, and those very Words were speaking to me with the understanding and knowledge of the God who wrote them! They were transcending both time and space with a perfection that staggers the imagination! You see the Bible is the very matrix of reality, it is “GOD” in written form: If A=B , and B=C, then A=C A = GOD , B = JESUS, C = WORD If GOD = JESUS, and JESUS = WORD, then GOD = WORD “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the WORD WAS GOD.” (John 1:1) But as it turns out the WORD is also the HOLY SPIRIT! “It is the SPIRIT that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the WORDS that I speak unto you, they are SPIRIT, and they are life. (John 6:63) “And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the SPIRIT, which is the WORD OF GOD.” (Ephesians 6:63) So the equation is now : GOD = WORDSPIRIT or G=WS When God removes the BEAM out of your eye spoken of by Jesus that hinders you from being able to SEE CLEARLY, and you realize those WORDS are speaking directly to you once the HOLY SPIRIT enters you, it turns the equation into: G = WS^2 (squared) Now doesn’t science itself claim that everything is made out of “energy” which they have shown is E=MC^2 (squared), hmm what a strange coincidence. “By the WORD of the LORD were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.” (Psalms 33:6) “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my WORDS shall not pass away.” (Matthew 24:35) “He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my WORDS, hath one that judgeth him: the WORD that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.” (John 12:48) HENCE THE IMPORTANCE OF FINDING OUT WHAT THE “WORD” HAS TO SAY! God Bless. Reply 1 reply @migagomni @migagomni 9 months ago ones reality is not the same as anothers. none of us need a scientist to tell us that. Reply @erangakulathunga5589 @erangakulathunga5589 4 months ago Read about buddhism more and more. Then you can understand the behavior of univers. Buddha gave the correct answers about the behavior of the universe Reply @Dwminor @Dwminor 8 months ago I am confused 😕 more now, did I 😳 do that moment!!! 🤣 🤣 🤣 Reply @attilamoundiou4707 @attilamoundiou4707 3 days ago (edited) The Schrodinger equation gives us probabilities about properties of subatomic particles. The very notion of probability is a product of the human mind, and it has nothing to do with the objective reality. One uses statistics to describe observations related to the behavior of the microcosmos. If statistics is flawed, then any theory building upon it is flawed. The notion of probbility essentially maps the properties of a population of elements to each and every element. This is a logical flaw. Nothig says that inidividual elements must have the exact same properties as a population of elements. Entanglement, as presented in this video is completely missleading. The fact that we can "instantly" find probabilities about properties of distant particles by looking at other particles in no way means that those particles are communicating with anything. It just shows that something is wrong with statistics. Reply @deathknell5167 @deathknell5167 7 months ago Quantum mechanics is but a glimpse into the very mind of God Himself. Reply @lesliehatun2044 @lesliehatun2044 8 months ago The space telescope 🔭 ✨️ looked into black space, after some time, many universes appeared.. Reply @Fiatluc @Fiatluc 6 months ago The current understanding of quantum entanglement is so laughable. Reply @christadauria4362 @christadauria4362 5 months ago In quantum physics boxing game, Einstein vs Bohrs in the watchful observation of Dr. John Bell, the Irish physicist . Who won with major victory in the boxing game in our international quantum physics community on our Earth??--Einstein or Bohrs--Think so carefully. Reply 1 reply @hemadayal7815 @hemadayal7815 3 months ago the Hindu scriptures say...All is One and One is All... Reply @brothermine2292 @brothermine2292 8 months ago This video is so misleading that I stopped watching after it claimed Einstein, Podolsky & Rosen thought entanglement is impossible. What they actually thought is that quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory... that particles have some properties that we can't measure ("hidden variables") which determine the behaviors of the particles, so that the states of the entangled pair of particles were predetermined (but unknown) before the states were measured. The EPR paper made two assumptions, called Reality and Locality in their modern formulations, that led EPR to the conclusion that hidden variables exist (Reality) and are local to each particle. Since quantum theory lacks the hidden variables, they concluded it must be incomplete. In the 1960s, John Bell proved that those assumptions lead to the prediction of less correlation in entanglement experiments than quantum theory predicts, and since the experiments have shown the actual correlation agrees with quantum theory, the result implies Reality or Locality (or both) must be wrong. Since so little is known about the nature of space, it's quite plausible that Locality is the assumption that's wrong. (Locality assumes no particle can be affected by a cause outside the particle's past lightcone. It's related to the idea that the speed of light is a speed limit.) Discarding or weakening Locality would allow hidden variables that aren't local, preserving reality and explaining the entanglement correlations. Discarding or weakening Locality would also solve the earlier "spooky action at a distance" problem that was bothersome long before EPR entanglement was theorized: the simultaneous "collapse" of a photon's Schrodinger wave function everywhere when the photon is absorbed by an electron at a point in spacetime, even though the wave function had been nonzero far from the absorption point a moment before the absorption event. 1 Reply 1 reply @jamesanonymous2343 @jamesanonymous2343 7 months ago I SHOULD;NT HAVE GOTTEN MYSELF " ENTANGLED " IN THIS SLIPPERY SUBJECT ! Reply @Tabascosause @Tabascosause 9 months ago If people really cared about the future they would try to protect star children (Indigo children) rather than giving us ADD/ADHD medication. I find it more scary that people in power know what they're doing. Being born and reborn multiple times isn't just a gift, but also a burden. I love everyone, but to the few that know what they're doing for evil.. I sincerely say forget you. I can't wait for you to go home and leave this world. 1 Reply @octogirl2046 @octogirl2046 7 months ago Yeah, he lost me saying, “what were gods thoughts when creating this world”. Reply @marylouleeman591 @marylouleeman591 7 months ago For Einstein's question of what God had in mind when he created the universe was us. Us and Jesus. Imperfect beings perfected by Him. He was lonely and wanted company. Us true believers understand this clearly, among them my scientist friends. Do you have a better explanation? Oh right. Darwin the dweeb thought it was all a fairy tale. Reply @AmyAmy-er8bp @AmyAmy-er8bp 2 days ago (edited) Ever tasted scrambled eggs? Like really tasted them? They taste amazing! Basically it sends signals to your brain that they taste good, except some never received them. Everyone can eat spicy food. Reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 7 months ago (edited) well well was newton wrong about gravity because Einstein warped the fabric of space time existing gravity well in unknowing as i never charted or fully mathed conjecture Reply @IWANTMYMOVIE @IWANTMYMOVIE 8 months ago It's so funny. They just keep proving more and more the existence of God. Einstein was afraid and even kept up at night with his "spooky action at a distance" and very good reason. All that he theorized regarding his most "sacred science" was wrong. Reply 3 replies @ybwang7124 @ybwang7124 7 months ago Einstein: spectacularly wrong on quantum theory Reply @AdamosDad @AdamosDad 9 months ago God spoke everything into existence and His words reverberate through the universe. Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Reincarnation is a quantum thing! The should be studied energy is an absolute bit it can be change while it's still being energy... Math is the language of God? Reply @glitchedsea6870 @glitchedsea6870 7 months ago i think i was just shown proof for mind over matter haha Reply @jamesdodd2977 @jamesdodd2977 9 months ago Here's a riddle for you. We have invented a time machine about the size of a chair. You and your friend are sitting at the table visiting, and you decide to jump ahead 1 minute. You arrive at the same spot you left from. For 1 minute, to your friend, you have disappeared, then he will catch up to your past . You're still a minute ahead. Are there two of you now? Reply 2 replies @alexlifeson8946 @alexlifeson8946 8 months ago I like PBS because it's real science. Not big foot, flat earther, ancient alien ubduction nonsense Reply @AsifAli-hy3yt @AsifAli-hy3yt 7 months ago There word of God cannot be destroyed so it always remain conserved Reply @larryhanshew5173 @larryhanshew5173 9 months ago This explains how GOD sees and knows all things…It’s real. 😮🤔😎☝️ 2 Reply @Berdymadafakas @Berdymadafakas 8 months ago 35:00 I could have drew that free hand Reply @bjornragnarsson8692 @bjornragnarsson8692 6 months ago I would not call the math of quantum mechanics beautiful. It’s actually rather ugly. The math of quantum field theories is a bit more pleasant (except for quantum chromodynamics), but still not as palatable as classical mechanics and, especially, general relativity! Of course that’s a subjective observation. Reply 5 replies @JustSeis @JustSeis 2 months ago There is some entanglement of the physicists !! Reply @attilamoundiou4707 @attilamoundiou4707 3 days ago (edited) Nothing is random. We are just unable to handle the complexity of causes of some effects. BTW helluva random generator they've made. In order to have some practical result of all of this effort, they could set up some random number server accessible through the internet. Unfortunately we are still at square one. The video says that transistors use entanglement while these guys are trying to repeat the Bell experiment using a different random generator. If transistors using entanglement was a fact, then why bother? Isn't it already proved then? Well, that statement about transistors is simply not true. Quantum physics does not describe how our universe works in reality. What it describes is how reality appears to us. Hence it is not necessarily the actual reality which is described. All we can predict are probababilities of measurements? Events to which humans assign low probabilities still happen and vice versa. Those equations, while logically consistent, tell us nothing about actual reality. It becomes more and more obvious that Albert Einstein was the last physician to be taken seriously. Until God's Equation is found we only have probabilites and dark energy. The only reality related to quantum physics is the huge amount of effort and money spent on it udingt the past decades. Or is that also just an illusion? :) Good luck with quantum computing. Reply @ManuelBasiri @ManuelBasiri 1 month ago A great documentary which just had to stain it with the name of God at the very last second. Reply @johannaprice4880 @johannaprice4880 4 months ago It is real😊❤ Reply @user-ik6gr5ue4o @user-ik6gr5ue4o 5 months ago ผมเห็นภาพช่งจะตายผมผิดหวังช่ง ที่มิเข้าใจคนเท้าตัวของช่งเองคนบ้าเค้าทำเท้าช่งคิดช่งคิด ช่งต้องเข้าใจตัวให้ได้ก็ยังมิผ่าน มิให้ยังมิสอนช่ง เริ่มใหม่ 1 ใหม่ช่ง มองคนบ้าคิดให้คนบ้าเท้าช่งคิด คิดเกินคนนะช่ง🧐ཽཾུง่ายเองช่งมิเลย คิดมิได้ ช่งเขียน y♡u คนที่เขียน ช่งที่อ่าน ยังมิจบบท 1บทพอช่ง Reply 1 reply @bless_yore_-heart1914 @bless_yore_-heart1914 9 months ago Now tell me the Earth ISN'T flat, I dare you. Vindicated Reply @ericcsudduth5166 @ericcsudduth5166 9 months ago Should be renamed the scientific search for God almighty 🙏 Reply @user-wu5sk5hb1h @user-wu5sk5hb1h 2 months ago Brothers and Sisters, God loves us so much that He sent His Son Jesus Christ for us, who, bled and died on a cross for us to redeem us from death, to gain life everlasting, for those who put their trust in him. And what's more, he has risen, and is willing to call you to repentance (correction) and as his witness, by his grace indeed. "For it is by grace you have been saved". Jesus loves you, God cares for you! 1 Reply 1 reply @grouchyoldman5348 @grouchyoldman5348 6 months ago There are the known laws of physics and there are the laws yet to be discovered. Think outside the box! Reply @yaraviera4444 @yaraviera4444 2 months ago Thanks PBS Reply @city5productions @city5productions 8 months ago one possible problem…a condition if time..is doubtful,,a past condition of a supernova having a past…is in question,etc..,…etc..a flow of time is a idea,…if time doesnt flow,there possibly is no past…the supernova vibrating to a univeral order,tied to a big bang Reply @TERRANOVAofficial @TERRANOVAofficial 7 months ago as long as we understand that the atombomb is real enough to end humanity and bullits kill Reply @thisutuber @thisutuber 4 months ago 13:50 It's there, but in another form..? Reply @babakgholian3467 @babakgholian3467 7 months ago When you cannot explain a fenomennan it means you don't understand it . Reply @43M. @43M. 6 months ago If they figure out the origin of the universe, it will be marketed to us and we will have to pay to be here 🤷 Reply @user-os4fl4zj7d @user-os4fl4zj7d 3 months ago The simple things you see are all complicated. Reply @SweetPatite-fj5dz @SweetPatite-fj5dz 2 weeks ago Banks and data companies using quantum computing. 🤔 Reply @richardmccann4815 @richardmccann4815 8 months ago I can't believe they couldn't bring some salt for the roads. But they get paid by the hour, and evidently not to think! So urgent to solve these riddles, but they can't think of the simplest things! They must have trouble ordering dinner! Reply @3321far @3321far 4 months ago To quote the notorious Bill Cosby, "What's a QBIT?' Reply @abefikre8377 @abefikre8377 2 months ago This means quantem entanglement exists in the same dimension this is hurting my head Reply @jeremyswalley8625 @jeremyswalley8625 8 months ago Quantum mechanics is ridiculous!! Even common sense tells you it’s impossible! Reply 1 reply @jonathandavidfranco4979 @jonathandavidfranco4979 7 months ago Now I understand why Einstein said " the more you learn about science, the more you believe that God does exist"....... Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Energy is entangled.... Space entangled with energy and everything... Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago It's all the universal mind! Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Everything is connected! Somehow! Space is real? It holds all and it does not! It's empty and not! Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Reincarnation a quantum Study! Reply @tkilg7169 @tkilg7169 3 months ago Your life beyond death is quantum reality. Reply @jonesrick1 @jonesrick1 3 weeks ago (edited) John Lennon says it best: "Let me take you down, 'cause I'm going to, Strawberry Fields..." Reply @davecody5997 @davecody5997 1 month ago None of us exist everything I see or believe exists is just what I've imagined nothing is real except in my mind Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Again what is the distance between here right and on a vertical and then straight-up I will tell you I saw here in Polk County the Stars closer to me by Salton Sea as if the ground was getting closer to to the Reply @ummnine6938 @ummnine6938 4 months ago i didnt get the reference to maryum nawaz, is that a real speech, can any one share a link to it? Reply @khalsakhoj8274 @khalsakhoj8274 6 months ago The human body is mirrored Cosmos . Reply @RollingEasy @RollingEasy 7 months ago (edited) Murmurations? Birds sussed this, millions of years ago perhaps? Reply @northgeorgia7357 @northgeorgia7357 5 months ago Is that bridge real? Close your eyes and drive your car into it. Reply @petaranic4886 @petaranic4886 6 months ago Do you must stand in a special place in the cosmos to think? Why we must this on the earth ? Reply @susandombrowski4764 @susandombrowski4764 6 months ago If I am a twin , and my brother works out every day, do I also reap the benefits? 1 Reply @maineoutdoorsman677 @maineoutdoorsman677 4 months ago (edited) Can't they just stay up there if for Einstein Isn't this Hawking radiation Reply @avidnongetit8710 @avidnongetit8710 8 months ago I just wanted the facts not a set of days they couldn't do the test because it builds a artificial sense of tension. Ugh director thinks he's getting a Oscar? Reply @rwes61 @rwes61 9 months ago WOW! Reply @shallowcomics7565 @shallowcomics7565 9 months ago I have a headache. So everything is connected? Reply @darolalexander9561 @darolalexander9561 8 months ago Many times I'm 65 and I can't explain many things I've seen Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Super naturally dangerous guys could it be well a danger for anyone up in Reply @hamidmazuji @hamidmazuji 4 days ago it was the techno music that did it for me Reply @gloriousunicorn4896 @gloriousunicorn4896 3 months ago So cool Reply @williamgregory5582 @williamgregory5582 7 months ago the 4th dimension is the realm over observing.... If you see it you chance the outcome..dajave is us peeking behind the curtain. Reply @Kodeekat @Kodeekat 7 months ago I wonder if anyone has been promoted to the Bossa Nova... Reply @johnrogan9420 @johnrogan9420 7 months ago Soccer ⚽️ ball is a great model of a geodesic dome. Reply @Edward-yc5nc @Edward-yc5nc 9 months ago My Buell thunderbolt motorcycle lost 20 minutes on a regular basis. Very strange 1 Reply @jimmydoverylittle8806 @jimmydoverylittle8806 8 months ago Can we still order Doordash with a quantum computer? Reply @dipenshah5373 @dipenshah5373 6 months ago Hello i just want to know which link to click for the java shown in the add? Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago An illusionary Reality! What might be true today is not tomorrow!.... Even there it takes place? Reply @markwilliamson2795 @markwilliamson2795 7 months ago Please when speaking on video turn the music off or way way down...decide if this is a music video or an information video please.... 1 Reply @Ketofit62 @Ketofit62 5 months ago Everything is possible because it’s a computer Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago What would I tell I would say you cannot send people way up there too far up because you might not believe this it might just begin pull you right up Reply @4696885415 @4696885415 8 months ago Watching from Oak Cliff, TX 💪 Reply @ArtHelm @ArtHelm 7 months ago Trying to measure one phenomenon using the rules of another is a fools errand. Reply @unitedstatesofmordor @unitedstatesofmordor 7 months ago (edited) Why only pairs? Why always pairs? Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago And I will tell Einstein I was answering one question her Einstein if I was to predict what the end of the world you will say you don't know it I will say only if my world ended Reply @laurenthomas8399 @laurenthomas8399 9 months ago 10:01 🤩 Reply @alexeyplastun2976 @alexeyplastun2976 9 months ago "We are left with the conclusioms of the world that make no sense whatsoever..." Reply @roido6614 @roido6614 6 months ago All these equations and figuring atoms, time and space, scratching our heads, and at the end of all this Mystery, is God! What if In the pursuit of finding answers to the universe, we are understanding more about an Entity who created the answers! Reply @airheart1 @airheart1 9 months ago Qubits break my brain 🥴 Reply @ExplicitPublishing @ExplicitPublishing 6 months ago Oh, the drama! 8 minutes in, nothing has happened AT ALL! Now, it starts at the BEGINNING of Quantum Theory?! Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I predict that if you send someone up to space and they were to be grabbed by that gravity feel they would instantly died they will be like flies on a swatter is going to be like what a SpongeBob love collapse within itself just like junk is going to be gone and you'll never be able to bring that back Reply @Aymiikeeganmelb @Aymiikeeganmelb 6 months ago Ok so they have worked out when you throw a pebble in a pond ripples happen .. yayy for science ... o.O Reply @ingridhohmann3523 @ingridhohmann3523 7 months ago I.believe ,,tought,,between people at thousands of miles distance across the ocean has not been explained Reply @kevinmaccallum336 @kevinmaccallum336 6 months ago Our thoughts are energy??? Will say no more. Reply @KynszchDidales @KynszchDidales 7 months ago quantum mechanics is what you get when you start believing your own squiggles Reply @54321www @54321www 8 months ago E=Mc√ is the limiting factor. Poor is the man who allows his beliefs to be filtered through the canon of religion, politics, or science. Reply @sandyadkins2637 @sandyadkins2637 8 months ago Egypt knew this and secrets about so much more it’s about relaxing mind to mind also thi Reply @ricfermi5886 @ricfermi5886 7 months ago Einstein !? No, not Einstein but BOHR!! Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 7 months ago OK so where were we OK. So we have particles in distant parts of the universe let's say hydrogen particles so it's more precise OK. So these particles run into each other and stick and more and more particles keep running into each other eventually you have great clouds of hydrogen particles all stuck together all across the universe. So now what happens? Well the first particles at the core of the clouds start to feel pressure and the electromagnetic fields charge is growing stronger more and more pressure and more and more charge. And all of a sudden the particles in the center of each cloud start to fuse together and because there's so many the fusion process can't stop and all of a sudden the first stars appear ✨️ they are humongous due to the size of the hydrogen clouds that have gathered. This same process plays out across the universe due to time pressure and the tiny electromagnetic fields charge in each tiny hydrogen particle. Are we still together. So what's missing in what I've just explained 🤔 remember the particles are in the vacuum of space so what's missing? Reply @JoeDeglman @JoeDeglman 3 weeks ago Why is the failure of the Einstein model framed as a riddle, paradox or anomalies? Let's face it the Einstein model is a failed model. Reply @aghahassan4287 @aghahassan4287 7 months ago Why can't AI help where scientists get stuck ?? Reply @gabrielmcollazo6675 @gabrielmcollazo6675 7 months ago Everything has cause and effect! WE! better be careful on what we do or what kind of Pandora box we open! Quantum Entanglement is as all situations with all its possibilities! RRRRRRREAL! It does not take much for it to happen! Reply @marciliocarneiro @marciliocarneiro 7 months ago (edited) Tradução ruim para o portugues.Spooky action não é ação assustadora.É ação fantasmagórica. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Imagine being all think the terms right and I washing machine right I'm in the middle right but assuming that the magnetic field will be when I hit the side boom it is turning fast Reply @rickpontificates3406 @rickpontificates3406 8 months ago So this quark, muon, and boson walked into a bar... Reply @heinpereboom5521 @heinpereboom5521 2 months ago Great, those ghostly phenomena, now everything is possible, or rather, now you can make everyone believe everything. Now just make a computer that really works with this spooky system, so spooky results will come out of it. it is like life, which would have arisen from dead matter of its own accord, but there is no evidence of that either. Just like the Drake formula, which consists of 7 factors that you can fill in at will, that answer is also of no use to anyone. Everything is fun theory that is of no use to anyone in practice, so the opposite of Einstein's theories, which almost everyone really uses. Reply @Gatosani @Gatosani 7 months ago Puma punku / Tiahuanaco. The megalithics stones that the Incas said they didn't create them. That s previous unknown civilization did it 1 Reply @Gatosani @Gatosani 7 months ago Puma punku / Tiahuanaco. The megalithics stones that the Incas said they didn't create them. That s previous unknown civilization did it 1 Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I would like to ask Einstein Einstein could you be respectful and tell me one thing but well you already know everything Reply @ss-ib8gm @ss-ib8gm 4 months ago what about identical twins not even fraternal will they be entangled ....some ofbtheir experienceineven in that xase twins also show that connection ....even with some parents and kids Reply @user-kj8lq7mo2s @user-kj8lq7mo2s 2 weeks ago What about the BOHM pilot wave and hugh Everett many worlds interpretation. Reply @whirledpeas3477 @whirledpeas3477 4 months ago The amount of science deniers in the comments is amazing. Actually using the technology they don't believe in, kinda funny Reply @seekter-kafa @seekter-kafa 6 months ago this proved nothing, it is still, seems to me, that experiments fit the theory and not vice versa Reply @donaldpennino644 @donaldpennino644 1 month ago (edited) universe is folded on itself in space time ...there is no real distance..our concept is extremely limited...all just "fuzzy math" in the end..lol 1 Reply @pro_motion @pro_motion 1 month ago I am the new, un discovered Einstein. I have all the answers😊 Reply @bobohook @bobohook 9 months ago Sounds pretty Bishop Berkeley like. Perhaps close but still very far away. Reply @rssvss @rssvss 1 month ago 😅😅😅 "no one is affecting the outcome" - two months later "this is the data we extracted, and it supports us being right." LOLOLOLOL 1 Reply @krislounsbury9534 @krislounsbury9534 9 months ago "What were God's thoughts when He created the world?" (Einstein) 1 Reply 1 reply @PageMarker1 @PageMarker1 9 months ago Tesla was a real genius, not so much was 'OneStone.' Reply @Jovian721 @Jovian721 9 months ago "We grow too soon old and too late smart Reply @markkramer5412 @markkramer5412 7 months ago Well let's hope what she sed remains just that conclusions that make no since what would is the end Reply @user-nz9km6wj5m @user-nz9km6wj5m 3 months ago I’m a superAdom comprised of many atoms into one monolithic Adam!! Mwahahahaha Reply @photoreference9429 @photoreference9429 8 months ago We already know the answer, Einstein was wrong about this. People knew this for decades. Reply @freddyjefferson5164 @freddyjefferson5164 9 months ago And this little experiment cost 1,387,454,980.32 Reply @jamesharris4023 @jamesharris4023 7 months ago (edited) Einstein was right I'm not going to give people the answer why if you really want to know figure it out yourself . There are tons of better and more accurate videos that go in to more detail.It may take you awhile .But you will have some sense of accomplishment. Reply @FeatheryBird @FeatheryBird 9 months ago (edited) Notice in the group portrait, Einstein is giving the all seeing eye symbol. It's all a lie, all of it. Reply @user-oo4wk8hh6o @user-oo4wk8hh6o 2 months ago Quantum computer+light + dna=????? Reply @bradyhammerer1447 @bradyhammerer1447 2 months ago Ohh, it’s very real Reply @kevinhitzemann1257 @kevinhitzemann1257 6 months ago Thesis Quantum Mechanics The Light...Faster than the speed of light is future...not sure of past...black hole Reply @TjakaErasmus @TjakaErasmus 7 months ago Dis te rond vir my plat kop! 😂 Reply @TheOtherSteel @TheOtherSteel 9 months ago Permanence? No. Across a long enough time line, say 10 ^ 10 ^ 76 years, everything decays via quantum tunneling into bosons. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I would say that in space will rather than Aspen you have to Reply 3 replies @user-Godlovesme78887 @user-Godlovesme78887 2 weeks ago Maybe a quantum acult? Lol Reply @johnrogan9420 @johnrogan9420 7 months ago A wave of probability..lol Reply @markscheinfeld3020 @markscheinfeld3020 4 months ago Objects, universe, real, technologies, no-sense solutions. Reply @gimmyherbert8217 @gimmyherbert8217 7 months ago I have solved this riddle Reply @malvinacarabas5768 @malvinacarabas5768 9 months ago Lol . that squaw . Reply @lflee @lflee 4 months ago I hope that the background music could be less Michael Bay-ish. Reply 1 reply @pbssandman9985 @pbssandman9985 7 months ago 👍 Reply @williamthran8325 @williamthran8325 8 months ago Nothing in this documentary regarding quantum entanglement is proven--It's all what if and the possibility and suggests. Reply @shadowmaster9780 @shadowmaster9780 7 months ago I alway knew our realities is nothing but a simulation of a super computer, and a program or sofware, invented by GOD😁 Reply @expecto1982 @expecto1982 3 months ago Who asked for Earth to travel? Where did you want to go? Reply @stevelinbergbaby135 @stevelinbergbaby135 8 months ago by no default of my own🙌 Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago It is all created by the creator! Reply @markjaycox8811 @markjaycox8811 5 months ago If you think you can't grow wings then you feel less than an ant with wings. How do rodents get wings, and you don't? You are not looking for yours, are you? Reply @user-kj8lq7mo2s @user-kj8lq7mo2s 2 weeks ago What about the BOHM pilot wave and hugh Everett many worlds interpretation Reply @jimmifoulis @jimmifoulis 2 months ago magnetic memory Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago You know I really would like to say in regards to that particular issue of life and being equation being exact of the source that illuminated I will say my experience has been what of a song what you're looking at is a funnel what you're looking at is a what a shadow it's a reflection but it's not the actual thing you're looking at your own source and if you see any smoke is probably might be what but smoking will be the telescope Reply @Jovian721 @Jovian721 9 months ago AND THE ANSWER IS.... IT'S ALL AN ENDLESS ILLUSION . Reply @heidiengellenner9651 @heidiengellenner9651 2 months ago Im not sure, but in the video above. Scientist may have loacted the Red Grimore holding tank. God let them find it, so they knew it was real, now that Hell has been created, it would no longer exist. Reply @amotzbarakben-israel598 @amotzbarakben-israel598 7 months ago am i insane ... hold a mirror against a mirror, the fact the mirror(s) exist, says quantum is, not just parallel(s) but omni,; i don't challenge a beginning, but what is the creation of the balance OF the chaos...even it it is, a matrix, what is the program, who the programmer(s) - then who/what is the designer(s) of the programmers,......... Reply 1 reply @mathrodite @mathrodite 8 months ago This is popular science at its worst. NOVA PBS should not be shoveling this. Reply @venkybabu8140 @venkybabu8140 9 days ago What if people have there own rights. Soul procession. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago If I was to look at a a fly a fly and high-energy you know of sweeper where is going to pull out I would say that eventually that fly slowly would pull it in going to pull it into it just sucks it right in Reply @LorneABrown @LorneABrown 3 weeks ago Schrödinger's cat is ALIVE! Yipee! Reply @54321www @54321www 8 months ago You can't see air, usually, but it's real without seeing it. Why would probability be any different? U Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago The star is day. So what is photosynthesis? The star is day. How old are you? Reply @jimmygibson7045 @jimmygibson7045 7 months ago @38:50 the guy says "for example, Canada and Africa." OH, so the continent owned by China which is Africa, and Canada, who has been sold to China by castrudeau? Reply @syedshaukat6628 @syedshaukat6628 7 months ago Actually if you seek a reference or analogy from Quran; its clearly mentioned that Allah has created everything in this universe in pairs...a statement that can be applied or tested anywhere Reply @jakedefenbaugh603 @jakedefenbaugh603 7 months ago So a parelle universe is probale Reply @rudolf895 @rudolf895 6 months ago Imma stoner and I approve fhysics Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago The spacecraft would have a new development of some species at the tip where are the showers down on the astronauts that's where the new generic or the new living matter with her tip where we take showers and inside you will notice I noticed what a living just won multiple Reply @9one9Music @9one9Music 7 months ago Happy Birthday Albert! Pi Day! 🥳☯️ Reply @shop970 @shop970 8 months ago Most of society's hopes have been abolished in less than 100 years. The atrocities of the government are the primary forces that shape the world. Describe greed. Envy. Power. Lust. Because these are the reality. Not progress. Reply @eliseolopez6504 @eliseolopez6504 3 weeks ago You took his blue print he would have gotten to an old age elsewhere he would have given technology to the world Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Now in space I will tell you if it's absolutely no what no air and then how would you say if the person so tight how would you start fuel if you have know what I think you might have an explosion when you do it Reply @julielea8344 @julielea8344 8 months ago Tesla was far beyond him. Reply 1 reply @lildannefantom6195 @lildannefantom6195 9 months ago So the question is whether spooky connection/entanglement is real and how to prove it but can't? But we depend on this energy without total control but of hope and coincidence and it works. Alrighty then. Reply @randal_gibbons @randal_gibbons 7 months ago Why only pairs? 1 Reply @missjadedrage1111 @missjadedrage1111 6 months ago Imagine a game of chance that's somehow rigged. Lmao. I'll tell you what... But it's probably CLASSIFIED. 😒 Reply 1 reply @JohnRoberts-wk6rf @JohnRoberts-wk6rf 9 months ago Way above my paygrade! Reply @carriagereturned3974 @carriagereturned3974 3 months ago quantum entanglement proves that there's no space. It is an illusion. Reply @moniqueodile @moniqueodile 7 months ago Although I wanted to listen to this, but the music was so invasive that I ended the video half way. When the subject is fascinating, why bombard it with “suspense music “ from some fiction movie? Too bad… Reply @user-kj8lq7mo2s @user-kj8lq7mo2s 2 weeks ago Einstein and schrodinger and de broglie school vs Bohr Heisenberg Born Pauli THE COPENHAGEN SCHOOL I still believe thay Einstein's school is correct OR BETTER that QM is still incomplete. Reply @Heni930 @Heni930 4 months ago 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮 ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Reply @charlesparham3802 @charlesparham3802 8 months ago (edited) why not edit all the b.s. around the weather and just get to the subject🤠 Reply @tokajileo5928 @tokajileo5928 7 months ago this is many year old episode Reply @DRV-mt5dd @DRV-mt5dd 8 months ago Seems very odd to me if people on this level of measuring and deciphering would not believe in God..... Reply @emilcioran8873 @emilcioran8873 5 months ago 4:28 Jeep logo on steering wheel, shows Range Rover. Now that's weird. 1 Reply 1 reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Energy travels... Reply @brucemacmillan9581 @brucemacmillan9581 7 months ago NEWS FLASH: The moon is a lot bigger than a particle. 1 Reply @markjaycox8811 @markjaycox8811 5 months ago How many senses was your body born with? How many does it have now? You are still in PUPA DORMANT Stage. Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 7 months ago So Gravity where have you been thus far still not here OK we will wait. Galaxies how are they made? Well when the SDsupernova made the singularity they also made the singularity spin almost to the speed of light and since Gravity hasn't showed up there's no drag to slow them down. But the EMFs are going crazy with the spin of the singularity and all the helium that was made is slowly being pulled back to the singularity but on the way something strange happens all the helium particles start to get mixed into all the hydrogen particles that are still floating through space and something incredibly exciting happens the helium particles start sticking to the hydrogen particles and great clouds gather of these 2 particles until the fusion process starts up again but this time the star that's born isn't pure and the fusion process lasts much much longer and as this is happening more elements are being made in the new stars generation 3 stars but some don't live as long as others and supernovae start happening all across the galaxies everywhere. But in our galaxy we have new particles all across our small EMF of a galaxy and alot of new matter. Which starts to gather back around our Singularity and the something weird happens as it gets close to the sphere it runs into a boundary of really strong EMFs that seem to have flipped around so the new material can only get to this new boundary and as it starts to gather on this boundary it starts to heat up and an event horizon starts to form its not big yet but its growing. So what does this do to our singularity well it creates a buffer zone between the horizon and the singularity or ⚫️ blacksphere. Cool eh so where's is good Ole Gravity it's supposed to be here already where's Einstein when u need him oh here he comes. So lots of new stars being born and an event horizon is created and growing its getting big it's increasing the EMF of our singularity our blacksphere. Oh my it's given our Blacksphere an equator and it's pulling the EMF down with such force that it's stretching the EMF out its plaining to the edge of our EMF bubble 🫧 created by our blacksphere's emence EMF its making the bubble bigger the galaxy bigger. Now since our EMFs have plained out and we have an equator and the event horizon is huge but there so much material being used to fuel our Blacksphere the leftover material has no place to go except our closed system has the answer we will get rid of spent material through jets out the top and the bottom now we have an equator and poles now we have a frame of reference from which to decide up and down side to side. Reply @wakeup8870 @wakeup8870 12 days ago Entanglement is dark matter. Reply @CrystalTwinStar @CrystalTwinStar 8 months ago Twin Flames scientific explanation Reply @garybowler5946 @garybowler5946 5 months ago Don't these guys know how to take a sleeping bag and pack a meal so they can stay overnight or for several days at these telescopes. Reply @daniellewillardsen @daniellewillardsen 8 months ago And there is no holy grail. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Happens in the reality of this world is because we're in the middle of the magnet the magnet we're dead center so he can take his up I can't take this down elevation where the plank is stay flow it was a hit a very strong one of my it's going to be gone it was growing up it's going to go up in space if it's coming down it's going to drag you right down and wrecked into the ground Reply @mack8488 @mack8488 2 months ago It is understandeble einstein didnt like quantum fysics...he thought that HIS theories had brought him closer to what god was thinking when he created the universe. So closer to god. And here come people who talk about things that shouldnt be ( in his univerese) Reply @jerrystephenson1172 @jerrystephenson1172 8 months ago Seems the concept that all things are connected, through "god" or the source of all knowing, is being proven. Leaving faith....where? Reply @kailashsingh9737 @kailashsingh9737 7 months ago Very beautiful sir hi ji Reply @alyanton2157 @alyanton2157 5 days ago Only Einstein creating is nuclear ☢boom 💥bomber and whole world 🌎 nuclear ☢holocaust fearing till this day 🥶 Reply @eliseolopez6504 @eliseolopez6504 3 months ago You taken alberts math and made technology why don't you explain this math so we could also explore technology Reply @uwanttono4012 @uwanttono4012 7 months ago While this documentary was very entertaining and informative, the background music was awful and added no value to the program imho. Reply @user-Godlovesme78887 @user-Godlovesme78887 2 weeks ago Could God be a quantum computer? Reply @jacktettero4507 @jacktettero4507 7 months ago Time does not exist Einstein Fake person No time travel words are no reality 🙏 wt is real in this world eating and Moving 😉 1 Reply @vicheakeng6894 @vicheakeng6894 2 weeks ago Affection ❤to is the cause for 😢 40:49 Reply @robertderrick9489 @robertderrick9489 8 months ago Could do without the music Reply @oryxchannel @oryxchannel 9 months ago After billions are spent in China to build their quantum communications system...one look no further to the ancient practice of meditation to crack it. Aka "RV". Reply @AndreAnyone @AndreAnyone 9 months ago Quantum computer can NOT Crack encryption lol at least not good encryption Reply @wtfadtua @wtfadtua 6 months ago They do not even respect your last will... Reply @user-Godlovesme78887 @user-Godlovesme78887 2 weeks ago Everlasting life. Reply @brucemacmillan9581 @brucemacmillan9581 7 months ago NEWS FLASH: The moon is much bigger than a particle. 1 Reply @JuanRivera-gc7fq @JuanRivera-gc7fq 2 weeks ago Also dice and card magic tricks is manipulation of energy not contant as in nature thats c in mc 2 Reply @johnrains8409 @johnrains8409 4 months ago Used by banks and data companies, maybe. But you can bet the aft part of you body residing about in the middle that the government is using them. Reply @leslielutz6140 @leslielutz6140 8 months ago Space Force. Reply @martinnorberternstschmidt1306 @martinnorberternstschmidt1306 6 months ago It's not correct to call them particles yet ,before measurement !!! Martin Norbert Ernst Schmidt Reply @islewait6107 @islewait6107 3 months ago ♡Dylan was "Tangled Up In Blue;" right?!?😂 🎶 Reply @cookiecrumbles2948 @cookiecrumbles2948 7 months ago Very noisy sound effects. It’s not a video game. Reply @dr.ralphwinestock6531 @dr.ralphwinestock6531 8 months ago (edited) 45:30-45:37 "The numbers look really great"' And what did they show you after that? Nothing! No explanation whatsoever about the degree of entanglement. And that should be the whole enchilada of what they found. Entanglement exists with huge problems folks. Not close to explaining why there are so many off points. More PC mindf_+Y. The very thing they propose in the beginning about what if there is slight of hand happens here at the end. Reply @Jovian721 @Jovian721 9 months ago I can prove a table is there, I can prove that the table is not there, but I'm sure that a watched pot WILL boil them why does time go slow and the day drags slow, but the day seems to fly bye to another completely different people in say different ways than they are attracted to you or repelled from you and all at the same time?! Clear as mud right?? Reply @JuanRivera-gc7fq @JuanRivera-gc7fq 2 weeks ago I know they explaining quantum but leave out the organic four elements they just work with inanimate vs animare jeffrey dahmer stuff. Reply @santaclase3410 @santaclase3410 7 months ago get well everbody 🥰🥰🥰 Thanks forn sharing🥰🥰🥰Thanks forn sharing🥰🥰🥰 Reply @fernno9646 @fernno9646 4 months ago Entanglement is real… ask Will smith’s wife. Reply @sociallyinept5430 @sociallyinept5430 4 months ago How you feel about eating that? Reply @madusonkeeper @madusonkeeper 8 months ago Was Tesla in that photo Reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 7 months ago (edited) illusion of confusion was the final variable in math and physics including quantum super determinism now you can reverse engineer universe from sonic inversion / big bang from the echo of silence in the now look careful you can find the sonic stall and densifier in echo of thunder itself recipricol math systems then 1/137 counting for fun if enough 1/137 could the relationships be charted Reply @Ketofit62 @Ketofit62 5 months ago It’s all computers Reply @Fire-Queen @Fire-Queen 5 months ago What is the music thats used??? 👀 Reply @tdudley15 @tdudley15 4 months ago (edited) Am I the filter or the detector? Wtf mate Reply 1 reply @Mademoiselle_Co_ @Mademoiselle_Co_ 7 months ago Nonsense- It's Universal Energy, law of attraction. Reply @AbdiPianoChannel @AbdiPianoChannel 7 months ago I'm quantum entangled with my girlfriend. I need to untangle Reply @aseprohmandar6812 @aseprohmandar6812 7 months ago quantum world is quantum God? Reply @bobstud3754 @bobstud3754 8 months ago Just like every mofo before the last mofo, YES, we will use the last best info to infer on the next supposition. Full stop. Reply @newagegame3002 @newagegame3002 9 months ago I 🤔 think he was genius but could never figure out everything that this 3rd dimension because with higher dimensions unseen or understood its impossible to understand God's complexity, or simplicity! Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Nice tidewater about the microorganisms in water you have a spaceship that thing is going to get out of spaceship say water is it bugs is a living matter so but that water's going to get out you cannot contain water. I found out Reply @davidmack4185 @davidmack4185 8 months ago (edited) PBS cannot take a dissenting opinion, they censored my comment, which disputed some of the nonsense in this video. There is no link between particle physics and quantum physics that is currently scientifically measurable. I guess they would have sided against Galileo in the 1600's as well. sigh. 1 Reply 1 reply @rb1431 @rb1431 6 months ago free will or destiny? Reply @JonathanSterlingUSA @JonathanSterlingUSA 9 months ago Looks like Peter Sellers. Reply @whirledpeas3477 @whirledpeas3477 4 months ago @34.20 Bologna. I can Google map drive 30 city's shortest routes in about 5 minutes on my phone. Not hundreds of years? Reply @g.o.a.t4674 @g.o.a.t4674 3 months ago 24:53 source of that clip Reply @rodgriffin1706 @rodgriffin1706 7 months ago in the great book of television i think we will add your comment under Matthew 1:1. Reply @joesatgolf4180 @joesatgolf4180 4 months ago Eisenstein went to America in 1933, the same age of Jesus Reply @YordkarYordkar @YordkarYordkar 7 months ago Albert Einstein destroys Kent Hovind. 1 Reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 7 months ago (edited) yet illusion of confusion was first answer in math and physics same as last loop in long form you will know for self is it the quantum consciousness of self cat in hat box intuitive uncertainty or quantum firmament unflinching Reply @peterkompter2417 @peterkompter2417 7 months ago correlation? dont tell us what it is, only that theres 'hardly' any room left so we shovfe it away and dont wantto deal with it ant more or we accept both, back to Fynman? ornput them together, maybe neither? bullshit, we're nowhere near an answer because they are still only looking at the same thing, could could could, odds are odds not an answer. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago And I predict what you see a magnetic field has a debt center right nothing if I was to put the all due respect this is fact I get a pin and the sooner this is my magnet I put the magnet right now I'm right in the middle of that particular magnet there's nothing there be no gravity. Whatsoever no pool this way or that way unless I move right or left attraction will be terrible but there will be nothing in the middle meaning what well I can come in and I can leave without no problem but the moment that I've come to much the right to left Isla boom take it or throw it see we're talkin about magnetic field North and South one is going to contract one's going to throw we're only talking about if the two elements of two identical magnets longest Earth magnets you have a note to self right because otherwise it wouldn't be back in it well keep it up eventually whatever is up there is going to come what we won't know about it will be dead Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago This video did not elaborate on electromagnetism, because then they would have to elaborate on the star. This video is science fiction. Read more non-fiction. Reply @gnatandgnu6015 @gnatandgnu6015 3 months ago You're crazy calling Einstein's laws "common sense"...most people have trouble grasping them! There's nothing intuitive about them either. Reply @expatgringo7538 @expatgringo7538 8 months ago HE SHOULD HAVE SAID THE WHOLE WORLD IS A BIG LIE 1 Reply @brendanpius930 @brendanpius930 7 months ago Simple. Reply @AsifAli-hy3yt @AsifAli-hy3yt 7 months ago This is entanglement where the time and space does not exist between cause and effect. Time and space is come into existence after the cause and effect i.e after the be or Kun or utterance of word of Allah (Lord/God) Reply @meherbabaisgod-lo8gd @meherbabaisgod-lo8gd 6 months ago 💕💕❤❤💘💘 Reply @normancash-alivelycadaver7479 @normancash-alivelycadaver7479 8 months ago The first eight min it about the bad weather Reply @stevekean512 @stevekean512 8 months ago Uh-oh there goes the neighborhood Reply @davidhorton2782 @davidhorton2782 8 months ago I would like to solve the problem pat......... only GOD ALLOWS WHAT HAPPENS ...MAN IS JUST A TOY FOR HIM ! Reply @jpkatz1435 @jpkatz1435 8 months ago Really HATE the " death at any moment" 'music'. Way too distracting to the narrative. Reply @steveliti2959 @steveliti2959 8 months ago Ted Cruz. A pitbull politician we can trust. Reply @dutchflats @dutchflats 1 month ago The entire segment regard the fundamental fysics, counter-culture group was unnecessary and silly! 1 Reply 1 reply @rpsingh9152 @rpsingh9152 2 months ago I don't know why but it looks strange whenever that girl trying to explain. The thing that she can say normally, don't know why to mix up her over dramatic image Reply @rogerscottcathey @rogerscottcathey 9 months ago From geocentric to egocentric philosophy of conceit. Physics designed to repel interest Reply @terrymaccarrone9927 @terrymaccarrone9927 8 months ago Nicoli Tesla is missing Reply @ytfp @ytfp 9 months ago Overproduced. What would be an interesting topic is like being at a rave mixed with the vibe of ancient aliens. Reply @kellyismyname777 @kellyismyname777 7 months ago you had me right up until the "new age" crap... Reply @christophergame7977 @christophergame7977 3 weeks ago (edited) Belief in 'spuhafte fernwirkung' is a popular religion just like the belief in 'man-made carbon-dioxide-emissions global warming'. In contrast with the classical religions, however, these two have no moral or ethical content. A difference between the beliefs in 'spukhafte fernwirkung' and in 'man-made carbon-dioxide-emissions global warming' is that while 'spukhafte fernwirkung' is used for an esoteric mystificatory pseudo-science, 'man-made carbon-dioxide-emissions global warming' is used for a power grab by the WEF-Deep-State-Rino-DNC gang. It is a remarkable fact that Clauser seems to belong to the 'spukhafte Fernwirkung' religion, but is a wakeup to the 'man-made carbon-dioxide-emissions global warming' religion. Reply @h.hickenanaduk8622 @h.hickenanaduk8622 9 months ago Standing on a whale fishing for minnows. Reply @louthurston8088 @louthurston8088 2 weeks ago clear as mud Reply @user-Godlovesme78887 @user-Godlovesme78887 2 weeks ago You can live forever. Reply @jackiwannapaint3042 @jackiwannapaint3042 8 months ago why all the annoying music Reply @zeusstan7639 @zeusstan7639 5 months ago I thought 💭🤔 THEY CALLED IT... SIAMESE TWINS ♊... QUANTUM INTAGLEMENT.. THING...... IN OLD DAYS THEY CALLED IT... SIAMESE TWINS Reply 1 reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 7 months ago (edited) no more lemon sunshine cream cheese Danishes for me now graph out long form the 5th dimensional turnabout traphic control system for volvos to move faster like a Saab , ohh no were did it go Reply @4TwentyFour20 @4TwentyFour20 9 months ago (M)(G²)=(T³)¹ 🤷‍♂️ Reply @chaisfitzwater8677 @chaisfitzwater8677 5 months ago It's real 1 Reply @jundu8471 @jundu8471 7 months ago (edited) 35:18 Of course when I hear the word hacker, they show image of Chinese/Asian face. SMH Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Oh yeah I could do that better I can make a light with no power Gary what lit up Reply @earthangels4977 @earthangels4977 4 months ago I wonder what if a religious person sees this Reply @alexswage1853 @alexswage1853 8 months ago Sharefacts// Quantum mechanics physics Rules 132multi dimensional universes in negative warp dimensional bubbles field Frequencies! To access by using warp dimensional saucer spacecrafts by matching each of the 132multi dimensional universes in negative warp dimensional bubbles field Frequencies 😳 this was done 1997yr by starDrive Engineering Company LLC Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago Time is the energy that links the astronomical to the quantum, time is the energy that links the quantum to the astronomical! There is no mystery. There is no conundrum. Read more non-fiction. Reply @sunwang3076 @sunwang3076 5 months ago I have anything that I wanted right now not only trillions US dollars and more Reply @williamgregory5582 @williamgregory5582 7 months ago math is God's word you can't understand it is is not meant to be, then again I suck at math but imagine if you had all the knowledge ever possible? You could know how to manipulate mass, join quasars, and the atoms make solid mass, and plasma and so forth...js Reply @nickbaugh2034 @nickbaugh2034 1 month ago Star gates real Reply @ingridhohmann3523 @ingridhohmann3523 7 months ago You should say science stepped into.the realm.of God Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago You know what I would do I will probably tie something up to a string and have certain levels of balloons holding it up like a you know a pretty strong so what slowly lifted monitor the air were there possibility of breathing and what we're going to have to come down something very strong put my life on some space thing that's not connected to something that's going to bring you down because p go up up up & beyond how you going to tell can you tell it to stop in 45 ft where did you measure the 45 now what about 45 feet is 450 mi how fast did you get there now it's 850 goddamn how long how fast did you get there you did not firerock it up there is gravity took you up there how you to bring that Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago And I would say I agree with him I'll tell you this the khleevi auctioning which means everything is coming down and we're going Reply @robertstack2144 @robertstack2144 9 months ago Why, Physicist, the Ultimate Test......ooooooh. So the will do their "ultimate " test. Then what. Guarantee they will want another "ultimate " test. They will achieve one great thing.........ruin the meaning of the word "ULTIMATE" Reply @vicnic8512 @vicnic8512 5 months ago Quantum comp? What is ufcking this? are you serious? Reply @irvine112 @irvine112 5 months ago am i the only one, who thinks about will smith's wife cheating, when it comes to quantum entanglement? 🤔 1 Reply 1 reply @donnacabot3550 @donnacabot3550 8 months ago E(J)=Mc2 Reply @janklaas6885 @janklaas6885 3 months ago (edited) 📍45:09 2📍22:39 Reply @davidgreen2379 @davidgreen2379 5 months ago Des Nali Wadget (Do No Harm) Das Premi Pederai (Footprint lead the WAY) SO DO NO HARM, LEAVE ONLY FOOTPRINTS Reply @Baldraz666 @Baldraz666 3 weeks ago much love Reply @kn9ioutom @kn9ioutom 4 months ago GOD DOES NOT PLAY DICE ! HE PLAYS ROULETTE !!! 1 Reply 1 reply @jamesanonymous2343 @jamesanonymous2343 7 months ago ASK THE EXPERTS,,,,,HOW MANY TINY PARTICES ARE IN MY BEEF & BEANS BURRITO ???????? Reply @djayjp @djayjp 6 months ago Space doesn't exist.... Oh ok sure. Reply @shawnheneghan4110 @shawnheneghan4110 9 months ago Nothing really new here. Quantum Mechanics makes no sense and is described by intractable mathematics. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago And I love my bridges scientist I love them all and I'm sorry for believe it is because she's going to have more study in fixing this and I have a lot of experience in magnets ice all I done fixed things that I could tell you this God bless me in the devil goes don't tell him the details you better let them figure it out Reply @ibvest7123 @ibvest7123 2 months ago This is not serious There are other ways to explain they don't speak about the weknes Reply @markadams7597 @markadams7597 3 months ago (edited) All this is also know as "Quantum Theory". "Entanglement" is also theory. As usual PBS/Nova is only telling the sensational "spooky" side while not considering the whole. It's recommended that this silly "documentary" be watched as entertainment, not as credible quantum. 2 Reply @mikeoco1850 @mikeoco1850 6 months ago I feel like this show attempts to dumb things down so much that it fails to explain any real science. Reply @tonik1222 @tonik1222 7 months ago This video didn't explain anything! Only threw up some chopped up concepts as if that would explain anything (it doesn't). Actually if anyone isn't already familiar with QM (and different interpretations) following this presentation (s)he would end up with an idea that has more loopholes than it has concepts. Reply @karatekid6026 @karatekid6026 9 months ago 😂 Reply @jamessotomayer2941 @jamessotomayer2941 9 months ago Energy frequency vibration it's all one and one with All.... Reply @christophergame7977 @christophergame7977 3 weeks ago "Well, do you?" (believe that the moon isn't there when you don't look at it?) (Dirty Harry.) There is nothing wrong with quantum mechanics. But the belief in 'spukhafte Fernwirkung' is a regrettable misinterpretation of it. We needn't bother ourselves with the meaning of the word 'complete'. Niels Bohr is the father of the regrettably persisting obscurantism. Reply @frankdimeglio8216 @frankdimeglio8216 8 months ago I have surpassed Newton and Einstein. Reply 1 reply @Furyswipes @Furyswipes 8 months ago Am I the only one who thinks these overproduced, sensationalized science shows are almost impossible to watch? Reply @AsifAli-hy3yt @AsifAli-hy3yt 7 months ago إِنَّمَآ أَمْرُهُۥٓ إِذَآ أَرَادَ شَيْـًٔا أَن يَقُولَ لَهُۥ كُن فَيَكُونُ ٨٢ Reply @alex79suited @alex79suited 7 months ago (edited) OK so what if I solved the epr papers for everyone. Spooky action at a distance in space in reality. Would everyone like Me to try yes OK. So I'm first going to tell you my Name then I'm going to start a new in another comment. So my name is Alex. Reply @anneober9891 @anneober9891 9 months ago love and even life is a plasma, but only agreed upon, to the connected, in that moment. our god is one. not the same times /space/ Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I do listen to you gentlemen all I know I understand what you're saying I don't want to be rude but I got to hook up with it doesn't work five fingers man I don't do that I do listen Reply @tomgrimes8379 @tomgrimes8379 8 months ago (edited) Jesus, Mary and Joseph! The background music is OPPRESSIVE! I'm about ready to turn off the sound and read the captions. Reply @dianecourtney2724 @dianecourtney2724 8 months ago So now what ? Reply @georgejamesducas9602 @georgejamesducas9602 9 months ago Einstein copied olinto de preto Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I have never met a symbol of what fellowship as what's I mean girlfriend poems Reply @randyb5067 @randyb5067 8 months ago To Much Music! Reply @doylebrockman8225 @doylebrockman8225 9 months ago Trust Einstein. 1 Reply @SandyRiverBlue @SandyRiverBlue 1 month ago Not two objects, two particles. In order to have two cards be quantumly entangled, every particle in one would need to be entangled with every particle in the other with the same distribution. Your example is ridiculous, pop-nonsense. 1 Reply 1 reply @e.p.t.2358 @e.p.t.2358 8 months ago Einstein is dead. I am not. Reply @lkn1107 @lkn1107 4 months ago Are they fnkin working or eating? Reply @mitterickson1872 @mitterickson1872 6 months ago Doctors Report Startling Rise In Testicular Injuries Among Woman Athletes Reply @FrancisTSYu @FrancisTSYu 2 months ago I recommend a video link as attached, then we may know why modern physics does not add up. https://youtu.be/Sk7ZEg68V-o Reply @incognito3620 @incognito3620 9 months ago If we are able to break things down into its smallest particle, and end up with nothing! How and what understanding and usable knowledge are we getting from this. If we continue to find, for instance, space and time does not exist and we are atoms floating within this parameter, then we do not exist. Wonderful! So now what? Is reality a figment of our collective imaginations if nothing exists? What are we searching for here? There is no God. Now there is no existence!? Am I a figment of my own imagination. Who is doing the imaging if not me. And what am I if I do not exist? Reply @Dracut @Dracut 1 month ago 38:23 Reply @thewayitis3054 @thewayitis3054 9 months ago It is real because God made it so. Reply @Ketofit62 @Ketofit62 5 months ago Princess Diana gonna tell the truth Reply @markjaycox8811 @markjaycox8811 5 months ago Your eyes see what your mind tells them is there, and the moment you tell your eyes there is more space: 10,000,000,002,023 in front of them, your eyes will see more life in front of them. Be Prepared to meet million year old life, (the why of God) and people born before Christ. Reply @markj7612 @markj7612 7 months ago An informative documentary, ruined by an atrocious soundtrack. Reply @claygorovoy5467 @claygorovoy5467 6 months ago He stole all other people's ideas and patents ,he was a moron 😮 Reply @jonathanlatouche7013 @jonathanlatouche7013 3 months ago 10:42 Reply @MichaelBravine1 @MichaelBravine1 2 months ago Hey, PBS documentary folks… stop with the “exciting tense” music. Completely unnecessary- it’s interesting enough without the silly musical additions. In fact, it makes me want to turn it off because it’s annoying. 2 Reply @CadenasInformaticas @CadenasInformaticas 9 months ago This rerun.. Reply @markjaycox8811 @markjaycox8811 5 months ago Wake up Pupa Dormant from your NEO POD-2023. Let TinkerBall crash your dull 4 digit no comma nowhere party by pretending she is a comma, and you're new 2,023 moment is simply fabulous! Time tunes the body, and until you swallow time, it cannot help you. Reply @yunhochangminm @yunhochangminm 7 months ago 48:59 Reply @paulcottingham241 @paulcottingham241 8 months ago Shallow explanations, misleading graphics and ridiculously over dramatic soundtrack make this a hard to watch waist of time. This is typical of the sad way Nova has come to present science. Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I have one thing to price that we were sitting up would-be makes contact with that wealth the force of the magnetism field what you going to do to bring it down what about experience what about what axis and what about the difficulties and what about the what what happens what happened to the German Shepherd that was all Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Again you're up in space you have an engine and you're very tiny I would say it to you won't have power once the mainetti for scratchy I will say what Reply @the_flat_earth_warriorz @the_flat_earth_warriorz 8 months ago Lol Reply @SteveLevy-ld7hl @SteveLevy-ld7hl 6 months ago Thankget well everbody 🥰🥰🥰s forn sharing🥰🥰🥰Thanks forn sharing🥰🥰🥰 ReSet🥰🥰🥰369 get well everbody 🥰🥰🥰 Thanks forn sharing🥰🥰🥰Thanks forn sharing🥰🥰🥰 Reply @notcoin @notcoin 9 months ago Too poor to make one. Follow the nothing trail Reply @PerspectiveEngineer @PerspectiveEngineer 9 months ago I oncce was ... Reply @georgebowen3925 @georgebowen3925 8 months ago HATE all that loud banging, pecking noise in the background. This smacks of carnival huckster entertainment rather than serious science Reply @sufthegoat @sufthegoat 8 months ago okk okkk okk Reply @jakegrist8487 @jakegrist8487 9 months ago (edited) I'm 45 seconds in. Whether I finish watching this or not depends entirely on whether the arcade music and the annoying car salesman narration gives way to direct content. Nope. Didn't make it. Reply @fransislaird3429 @fransislaird3429 8 months ago Yes Reply @tyroneallen7857 @tyroneallen7857 2 months ago The star is reality. This video is an allusion. Read more non-fiction. Reply @dennishuppe9902 @dennishuppe9902 9 months ago I know the answer 1 Reply @LMTF35 @LMTF35 4 months ago 2049 Reply @waynecassels3607 @waynecassels3607 8 months ago And there is no God? Reply 1 reply @azormaxo1762 @azormaxo1762 9 months ago I am AZOR MAXO i invented the theory E=mc2 Albert Einstein never been exist Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago How you do that trying to tell you yep yep yep I mom got me troubleshoot Reply @ThinhNguyen-fd7dz @ThinhNguyen-fd7dz 8 months ago MC²=?.Y.Photon Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Water it will but become a what are something of a bug man how you going to stop that in space I think you go up in space and you have water you're going to find out you can have wow Anubis develop and you don't know how potent they might be Reply @NeilRaouf @NeilRaouf 2 days ago no quantumn entanglement - no lionel messi moves Reply @jamesanonymous2343 @jamesanonymous2343 5 months ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HUH ! ? <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Reply @Stevelevy-gl4sl @Stevelevy-gl4sl 7 months ago sLow doWn thats 1 of da qustIon . & i M So iH 🥰🥰🥰 Reply @FialaStudio @FialaStudio 7 months ago Entanglement What is the deal with the guy eating a sandwich at the computer. Totally amateurish, unprofessional. Reply @northchgo4868 @northchgo4868 6 months ago Niels Bohr, and Max Plank deserve all the credit for Quantum physics. Einstein was WRONG and did not believe in Quantum physics, his name should not be associated with Quantum, stop propaganda. Reply @calvinbraxton9459 @calvinbraxton9459 9 months ago (edited) AS A BLACK AMERICAN CHRISTIAN SOLDIER EXMARINE JOGGER BOXER GUITAR PLAYER SONGWRITER ASPIRING SINGER GLORY TO CHRIST !!!! MY THEORY IS THIS (. HUMAN CAN NOT MAKE A PHYSICAL MOVE WITH OUT THERE BEING AN OPENING OR SOME KIND OF SPACE BEFORE YOU THAT ENABLE THE PHYSICAL PART OF HUMAN TO MOVE FORWARD THERE IS AN OPENING BEFORE US THAT ALLOWS A FIRST STEP TO ACTUALLY HAPPEN OR ( GOFORTH ) WITHOUT THAT SPACE AHEAD OR OPENING BEFORE US WE CAN'T MAKE EVEN ONE MOVE IN ANY DIRECTION 😳🤨🤔 HERE'S ONE MORE ICING ON THE CAKE !!!! ANYTHING THAT THE HUMAN MIIND CAN THINK OF CREATING CAN BE CREATED BECAUSE THE ELEMENTS ARE ALL RIGHT HERE IN REACH TO CREATE ( FROM THOSE WHOM HAVE A CLEAR AN OPENED MIND NOT CLOUDED BY DRUG'S AN ALCOHOL !!!!!!!! ALSO I TRULY BELIEVE THAT SOMEONE WHOM IS JUST BE PRONOUNCE ( DOA ) CAN ACTUALLY BE BROUGHT BACK TO LIFE THOUGH AN BY STIMULATING THE SEX ORGAN OR GLANDS OF THE MALE OR FEMALE !!!!!!!! BECAUSE THE STRONGEST NERVE IN THE HUMAN BEING IS THE SEXUAL FEELING THAT THE HUMAN FEELS USE IT IN A MEDICAL WAY TOO RAISE THE PRONOUNCED DEAD ( DOA ) THOUGH STIMULATION 🤔🤔🤔 Reply @SteveLevy-ld7hl @SteveLevy-ld7hl 1 day ago culTRUE is beautiFul but most don'T see it...& some doN't want to cEE it...take car of youR people please...im soRRy this is how it come's though..me... Reply @vicheakeng6894 @vicheakeng6894 12 days ago Yes Reply @johnsrinivasan4507 @johnsrinivasan4507 3 weeks ago Why Da Drama and Sound effects ? Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Look babe I have a lawnmower right here right it is so cycler and I turn it on a super-fast power and if you're up in space was so you have some blue I could drag you Reply @TiborDevenyi-wd2ep @TiborDevenyi-wd2ep 2 weeks ago Thanks a She Seen Reply @amossloan6167 @amossloan6167 8 months ago l Reply @abhijitpal7750 @abhijitpal7750 1 month ago 09/19/2023. theory. (1) . Up next space history. <-0013 to -0123> = <-8655 to-8765>. Artificial intelligence world. Reply 1 reply @kcbarbarianhorde @kcbarbarianhorde 9 months ago The miiiiind Reply @ronaldjorgensen6839 @ronaldjorgensen6839 7 months ago (edited) energetic field illusion of substance or matter? mode4l electron as universal then use tesla thoughts on electron enter energetic field faster than light speed matrix shift pe4rceptual frame no toad licking needed close you eye to see within? Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago I said that in his pull you up right and you go up up we're not what I'm saying is once you go up up a little bit up and you can't stop that you are what I will call what Reply @pauljelismoesman9563 @pauljelismoesman9563 8 months ago with oppsitt proporties ! Reply @ThinhNguyen-fd7dz @ThinhNguyen-fd7dz 8 months ago ntTn.2.elementism=0.∆ Reply 3 replies @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago What about the rule for food and drinks in space and the rule for explicit food you know about the examples what you going to do for the sludge how you to bring that down how you going to take more food about the cans I'm talking about what the customs Reply @davecody5997 @davecody5997 1 month ago We dont exist its all a belief I have! Reply @jackrobertson1679 @jackrobertson1679 2 weeks ago Pandoras box Reply @dev10199 @dev10199 6 months ago The pacing and fake drama make this unwatchable. I want to learn about science not watch reality TV about the bad weather. Reply @paulachisholm6227 @paulachisholm6227 7 months ago Maybe more women? Reply @anti_globalista @anti_globalista 1 month ago What a load of bull. It is a TV show, after all. Reply 1 reply @youtruckrek5121 @youtruckrek5121 7 months ago bs Reply @nwchrista @nwchrista 9 months ago Here we go with Einstein again. It's time to move on folks. He's a Charleton. Reply 1 reply @justbecauseOK @justbecauseOK 7 months ago way too much overbearing music ruined this and made it unwatchable Reply @tappet198 @tappet198 8 months ago Hobby lobby in paw patrol I'm not pervert Reply @user-lq9oi5jq3n @user-lq9oi5jq3n 2 days ago Ok. 1 Reply @AlienShine @AlienShine 1 month ago Einstein is a fraud. Edgar Allen Poe would like his poem back. Reply @markwilliamson2795 @markwilliamson2795 7 months ago Almost unwatchable with that annoying music playing all over this video .... my ears could not take anymore abuse ....please everyone that makes info videos keep your music videos separate from your info videos....How would you like to listen to a quiet coffee shop jazz video with people talking loudly all over it about how their day was ...... PLEASE STOP THE MUSIC !!!!!!! Reply @asidasid2487 @asidasid2487 2 months ago Bs waste of effort for no discovery Reply @wdvest8333 @wdvest8333 3 months ago Do not watch Magellan TV IT IS Ai 1 Reply @pinokiopinokio4335 @pinokiopinokio4335 7 months ago Thus ist lie. Reply @gman5269 @gman5269 8 months ago Yes THE DEVILS 👿 REFUSE TO RECOGNIZE LORD GOD CREATOR 1 Reply @roger6125 @roger6125 7 months ago wake up! this is God's breath breathing life into all the particles and such that he created and no one will ever figure out God's creation that he holds secret. Remember this is Satan's main goal that he and his hoards try to figure out. Sorry to tell you, they won't. God is great and almighty and everlasting Amen! p.s We are God's most loved creation and if we praise, honor and thank him he will give us endless blessings and great wisdom Amen! Reply @steveliti2959 @steveliti2959 8 months ago Ted Cruz 2024. Reply @samuelstephens-xn2ux @samuelstephens-xn2ux 7 months ago In a dream you have. And you have a dachavo you realize you have been here before. It hasbeen predestined by God for you to act on .The been Called A servant of God . If you knew the Gift of God. Man wont live on bread alone .But by every word that proceeds out of the Mouth Of God. (Sevant. Insramet. Of the Holy Ghost God Himself.) The creator. Reply @michellelindholm2100 @michellelindholm2100 6 days ago Does this mean that the ‘black space’ between galaxies is filled with entangled photons!? 🫥🫣💛🫠💛❗️ Reply @AsifAli-hy3yt @AsifAli-hy3yt 7 months ago All it takes, when He wills something ˹to be˺, is simply to say to it: “Be!” And it is! Reply Show chat replay 44:18 NOW PLAYING Ancient Aliens: Albert Einstein's Otherworldly Genius (S5, E5) | Full Episode HISTORY 585K views 3 months ago 7:47 NOW PLAYING 2022 Physics Nobel Prize for Quantum Entanglement Science Discussed 146K views 1 year ago 12:52 NOW PLAYING Welcome - Kwaai Personal AI Summit 2023 Kwaai 6 views 6 hours ago New 41:05 NOW PLAYING What Is Beyond Edge Of The Universe? - RYV ReYOUniverse 1.5M views 2 months ago 14:34 NOW PLAYING Critical Mass: when the atomic bomb got real Dr. Jorge S. Diaz 46K views 1 month ago 10:03 NOW PLAYING Albert Einstein: Unleashing the Power of Imagination The Quotographist 4.1K views 2 months ago 25:41 NOW PLAYING "Why we might be alone" Public Lecture by Prof David Kipping Cool Worlds Classroom 860K views 10 months ago 53:32 NOW PLAYING Cat Tales | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 1.9M views 10 months ago 57:35 NOW PLAYING The Origin of the Elements Jefferson Lab 2.5M views 10 years ago 10:31 NOW PLAYING 2021's Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics Quanta Magazine 1.4M views 1 year ago 48:49 NOW PLAYING Edward Witten: On the Shoulders of Giants World Science Festival 282K views 7 years ago 18:38 NOW PLAYING 近親繁殖鎖定超級基因，本該早已滅絕，卻成為速度之王！能被人類馴服，但卻永遠無法馴化的貓科動物——獵豹【老肉雜談】 老肉雜談 327K views 9 days ago 1:10:39 NOW PLAYING Genius Of The Jet | The Invention Of The Jet Engine: Frank Whittle | HD Documentary DroneScapes 3.1M views 10 months ago 1:06:59 NOW PLAYING 史上最入門的方式講解：到底什麽是量子？量子從何而來？| 超基礎、新人友好 青蛙刀圣1993 983K views 3 weeks ago 1:02:51 NOW PLAYING Albert Einstein - Greatest Brain of the 20th Century Documentary The People Profiles 1.3M views 9 months ago 18:22 NOW PLAYING 詹姆斯韋伯望遠鏡，最新照片發現宇宙Bug，宇宙大爆炸理論似乎存在問題「曉涵哥來了」 曉涵哥來了 344K views 2 weeks ago 53:32 NOW PLAYING Dog Tales: How Dogs Became Man's Best Friend | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 99K views 1 month ago 27:15 NOW PLAYING The Most Misunderstood Concept in Physics Veritasium 9.3M views 3 months ago 1:01:26 NOW PLAYING For the Love of Physics - Walter Lewin - May 16, 2011 Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. 9.2M views 8 years ago 23:00 NOW PLAYING 從不相信到相信，再到放棄| 一個信仰者的内心自述 青蛙刀圣1993 668K views 7 months ago 26 videos NOW PLAYING ザ 昭和アイドル　リスト 佐々木秀明 H 23:29 NOW PLAYING How Imaginary Numbers Were Invented Veritasium 16M views 1 year ago 20:09 NOW PLAYING "Unveiling the Tech Layers and AI Agents of #BadIdeaAI: A Comprehensive Update" - Mr. Lightspeed CryptoMarxist 56 views 5 hours ago New NOW PLAYING #中視午間新聞線上看 20231023 (週一) 中視新聞 209 watching LIVE NOW PLAYING Mix - NOVA PBS Official More from this channel for you 11:31 NOW PLAYING The Creation of the Universe: Cosmic Alpha to Omega #universe #bigbang #endoftime Apex Astrophysics: Exploring Cosmic Curiosities 186 views 5 days ago New 37:31 NOW PLAYING Paganini - Violin Concerto No.1, Op.6 (Shlomo Mintz) 1997 Akanao - 保証したドM 156K views 6 years ago 13:12 NOW PLAYING "Godfather of AI" Geoffrey Hinton: The 60 Minutes Interview 60 Minutes 456K views 13 days ago 9:30 NOW PLAYING Love: A Cinematic Journey The Vintage Tribute 47K views 1 year ago 5:35 NOW PLAYING New Discovery! James Webb Space Telescope Finds A Star That's Older Than The Universe! Kosmus 1.2K views 5 days ago New 4:51 NOW PLAYING Albert Einstein's Life Lessons Men Learn Too Late In Life Life Quotes 10K views 1 month ago 42:14 NOW PLAYING Michio Kaku: The Universe in a Nutshell (Full Presentation) | Big Think Big Think 20M views 11 years ago 41:17 NOW PLAYING Lec01 入門：簡介阿拉伯、中東、伊斯蘭之間的關係 NYCU OCW 741K views 6 years ago 52:22 NOW PLAYING 【精選】習近平「讓解放軍到處撒野」轉移人民內亂焦點？加拿大軍機遭「5米超近死亡凝視」：還看到共軍比中指！【關鍵時刻】劉寶傑 關鍵時刻 57K views 19 hours ago New 1:02:12 NOW PLAYING Michio Kaku | Quantum Supremacy | Talks at Google Talks at Google 327K views 4 months ago 16:08 NOW PLAYING "Chip ban version 2.0" Biden is furious! 關鍵時刻 67K views 3 days ago New 19:10 NOW PLAYING String theory - Brian Greene TED-Ed 6.6M views 10 years ago 21:38 NOW PLAYING 撒哈拉變成沙漠前的樣子你難以想像！黃沙之下掩埋著諸神之戰的真相【文昭思緒飛揚285期】 文昭思緒飛揚 - Wen Zhao Studio 548K views 1 month ago 1:50:48 NOW PLAYING Yes, Giorgio YouTube Movies & TV Romance • 1982 Free with ads PG 1:10:14 NOW PLAYING Physicists Proved the Universe Doesn't Exist Space Matters 505K views 2 months ago 30 videos NOW PLAYING WSU Master Class World Science U 45:01 NOW PLAYING Itzhak Perlman: Brahms - Violin Concerto in D major, Op. 77 Allegro Films 2.3M views 6 years ago 7:51 NOW PLAYING [Recollection of...] Sealed Hollow Darklight -7 (для Alex P.) anifan_jp - lore diggers united 20 views 22 hours ago New 38:27 NOW PLAYING These Substances 'Defy the Laws' of Physics ReYOUniverse 840K views 1 month ago 46:29 NOW PLAYING Basics of Buddhism: Lecture Series Patrick Goodness 510K views 5 years ago 15:57 NOW PLAYING "...Think in Terms of Energy, Frequency and Vibration." -Nikola Tesla Leo Cavalier 4.3K views 1 month ago 36:31 NOW PLAYING 宇宙大爆炸能量從哪裏來的？物質如何無中生有？大爆炸有哪6個證據？又有哪3個致命缺陷？這個視頻全面、深刻、系統的總結了 最新的宇宙大爆炸理論 道可道Science 9K views 7 days ago 53:45 NOW PLAYING How Leonardo da Vinci Changed the World People Who Changed the World 3.5M views 3 years ago 1:05:37 NOW PLAYING Einstein and the Quantum: Entanglement and Emergence World Science Festival 2.1M views 1 year ago 54:28 NOW PLAYING Ancient Earth: Life Rising | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 101K views 4 days ago New 1:25:00 NOW PLAYING 【關鍵復刻版】習近平為清北京霧霾「強關八萬工廠」趕走人？老翁嚴冬燃煤「公安就罰千元人民幣」連取暖都不行！？ 20171201 全集 關鍵時刻｜劉寶傑 關鍵時刻 62K views 14 hours ago New 1:10:23 NOW PLAYING 【精選】習近平「AI晶片遭美封殺再升級」台灣都遭殃？輝達、AMD股價大跳樓「連台積電都被美禁令震垮」！？【關鍵時刻】劉寶傑 關鍵時刻 63K views 16 hours ago New 51:19 NOW PLAYING 【關鍵時刻下集】20231020 習近平第3任滿週年「跌破防線」！A股3000點保衛戰「滑鐵盧」 港股成資金逃亡通道！？｜劉寶傑 關鍵時刻 106K views 1 day ago New 1:09:01 NOW PLAYING Tesla - Inventor of the Modern World Documentary The People Profiles 1M views 5 months ago 53:36 NOW PLAYING Decoding da Vinci | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 3.2M views 7 months ago 39:47 NOW PLAYING 【精選】中東不滿美國讓中國有機可乘！？習近平大撒450億美金拉攏兄弟包辦大埃及博物館工程！？【關鍵時刻】-劉寶傑 黃世聰 李正皓 王瑞德 吳子嘉 林廷輝 關鍵時刻 42K views 22 hours ago New 1:01:54 NOW PLAYING 【烏俄內幕】中印急撤僑「核戰」一觸即發？普丁下令4州戒嚴「末日將軍」全權接管戰局！【關鍵時刻】劉寶傑 關鍵時刻 240K views 18 hours ago New 54:28 NOW PLAYING Ancient Earth: Birth of the Atmosphere | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 149K views 2 weeks ago 33:49 NOW PLAYING 半個小時看完，你就懂量子力學！包括量子糾纏，量子隧穿，量子退相幹！ 科学认识论 698K views 6 months ago 43:02 NOW PLAYING It Started with a “Beep” MEASAT Global Berhad 67 views 2 weeks ago 43:55 NOW PLAYING Sweet Death: How Sugar Is Making Us Sick | ENDEVR Documentary ENDEVR 2.1M views 1 year ago 9:45 NOW PLAYING Breakthrough in Understanding Gravity Yefim Bakman 5.8K views 4 weeks ago 4:35 NOW PLAYING SpaceX Starship Updates! Ship 26 Performs Static Fire Test at Starbase! TheSpaceXShow TheSpaceXFans 1.6K views 11 hours ago New 46:37 NOW PLAYING PBS The Fabric of the Cosmos 2of4 The Illusion of Time Positive Algorithms 118K views 1 year ago 0:36 NOW PLAYING Albert Einstein speaks about the Global Science Festival Kerala Global Science Festival Kerala 162 views 1 month ago 17:22 NOW PLAYING Light Waves in Quantum Mechanics M-Theory University 473 views 2 months ago 1:00:18 NOW PLAYING Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong The Royal Institution 5.9M views 6 years ago 1:06:39 NOW PLAYING Mysteries of Modern Physics by Sean Carroll Darwin College Lecture Series 838K views 3 years ago 57:37 NOW PLAYING The other end of a black hole – with James Beacham The Royal Institution 1.7M views 1 year ago 8:16 NOW PLAYING Another Blow to Big Bang! James Webb Telescope Detects a Structure that Should Not Exist Kosmus 8.9K views 11 days ago 38:15 NOW PLAYING 說不盡的宋朝：一口氣看完兩宋18帝的奇遇人生！南宋之後再無中國？宋朝為何如此弱雞？| 床台 床台 32K views 12 days ago 51:19 NOW PLAYING NOVA Time Travel Episode Dan Burns 166K views 3 years ago 1:01:00 NOW PLAYING Michio Kaku: Future of Humans, Aliens, Space Travel & Physics | Lex Fridman Podcast #45 Lex Fridman 4.3M views 4 years ago 59:55 NOW PLAYING Secrets of the Universe: Exploring Energy and the Laws that Govern Our Existence | Doc Of The Day Doc of the Day 189K views 3 months ago 16:36 NOW PLAYING 朱莉婭·羅伯茨的又一部經典之作！為了當下的幸福和快樂，你是否願意重蹈覆轍？【阿奕】 阿奕电影 18K views 1 day ago New 59:27 NOW PLAYING Chaos Theory: The Science Behind the Miracle of Intelligent Life | Doc Of The Day Doc of the Day 698K views 5 months ago 1:29:38 NOW PLAYING History for Physics - "History of and for Physics" by historian of science David Kaiser IQOQI Vienna 5.5K views 3 years ago 11:52 NOW PLAYING Ancient Egyptian Archery Archery Historian 2.3K views 1 year ago 1:15:19 NOW PLAYING What Actually Are Space And Time? History of the Universe 8.4M views 1 year ago 1:56:44 NOW PLAYING Quantum Physics: The Science That Defies All Logic | Secrets Of Quantum Physics | Progress Progress - Technology History Documentaries 288K views 1 month ago 6:08 NOW PLAYING Following an American's long journey home from Iran 60 Minutes 3.2K views 6 hours ago New 40:16 NOW PLAYING Paganini / Violin Concerto No. 1 | HIMARI - Keri-Lynn Wilson - NHKSO NHK Symphony Orchestra, Tokyo - NHK交響楽団 1.6M views 5 months ago 57:30 NOW PLAYING Leonard Susskind: Quantum Mechanics, String Theory and Black Holes | Lex Fridman Podcast #41 Lex Fridman 851K views 4 years ago 1:05:30 NOW PLAYING Eight Wonders Of Our Solar System | The Planets | BBC Earth Lab BBC Earth Lab 3.4M views 7 months ago 2:31:27 NOW PLAYING WSU: Space, Time, and Einstein with Brian Greene World Science U 1.8M views 3 years ago 56:11 NOW PLAYING A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics - with Sean Carroll The Royal Institution 3.7M views 3 years ago NOW PLAYING 衝突擴! 以空襲約旦河西岸清真寺 打仗優於救人?以人質家屬控遭拋棄【1023FOCUS世界新聞LIVE】 Focus全球新聞 498 watching LIVE 2:08:03 NOW PLAYING Brian Greene and Leonard Susskind: Quantum Mechanics, Black Holes and String Theory World Science Festival 1.3M views Streamed 2 years ago 1:57:54 NOW PLAYING Mind-Blowing Facts About Our Reality [4K] | The Secrets of Quantum Physics | Spark Spark 8.4M views 1 year ago 2:31:27 NOW PLAYING WSU: Space, Time, and Einstein with Brian Greene World Science Festival 6.3M views 3 years ago 1:57:22 NOW PLAYING Professor Jim Al-Khalili Explores What The Universe Is Really Made Of | Spark Spark 1.9M views 11 months ago 2:26:46 NOW PLAYING How Did The Universe Begin? History of the Universe 6.3M views 5 months ago 53:33 NOW PLAYING Your Brain: Who's in Control? | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 1.4M views 4 months ago 37:22 NOW PLAYING Why the Middle East’s Borders Guarantee Forever Wars RealLifeLore 3.3M views 4 months ago 53:32 NOW PLAYING Ice Age Footprints | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 2.2M views 1 year ago 1:53:04 NOW PLAYING Black Hole Apocalypse: What's Inside a Black Hole? | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 533K views 1 month ago 1:24:07 NOW PLAYING "Is Consciousness Produced by the Brain?" by Bruce Greyson science for monks 261K views 9 years ago 4:28 NOW PLAYING WovenEarth Ventures' Jane Woodward on the Most Promising Areas of Climate Tech Innovation Impact Entrepreneur 10 views 16 hours ago New 1:46:52 NOW PLAYING *Magical* EFREN REYES vs MIKE SIGEL $200,000 8-BALL ray carlton billiards 16M views 7 years ago 50:27 NOW PLAYING From social media to generative media TASA (The Australian Sociological Association) 14 views 10 hours ago New 39:28 NOW PLAYING Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough; Powering Electric Vehicles; Carbon Capture | 60 Minutes Full Episodes 60 Minutes 1.8M views 3 months ago 1:26:52 NOW PLAYING The Theory of Everything | Quantum Reality Space, Time, and Entanglement Evil Space 165K views 5 months ago 1:34:31 NOW PLAYING What Is Beyond Edge Of The Universe? Space Matters 595K views 4 weeks ago 40:55 NOW PLAYING The Bell Curve: The most controversial book ever in science | Richard Haier and Lex Fridman Lex Clips 1.2M views 1 year ago 1:33:05 NOW PLAYING 2023 10 21 Halifax RASC Oct Mtg - the Mutant Beaver edition RASC Halifax 27 views 11 hours ago New 16:33 NOW PLAYING Mathematical tools | Lecture 14 | Radius of curvature in polar coordinates Physics Educator 16 views 39 minutes ago New 2:41:30 NOW PLAYING 【TOP2022】習近平一帶一路原形畢露「各國搶著逃命」！？東南亞滿地爛尾工程「橋梁水壩住宅都斷頭淪鬼城」！【關鍵時刻】-劉寶傑 姚惠珍 李正皓 林廷輝 吳子嘉 黃世聰 梁東屏 林裕豐 黃暐瀚 李奇嶽 關鍵時刻 11K views 1 hour ago New 2:07 NOW PLAYING How Do Stars Go BOOM❓💥 | The Mind-Blowing Truth About Supernovae!🌌🌠🔭 #nasa #space #facts #astronomy Astro Synapse 1 view 50 minutes ago New 50:25 NOW PLAYING PBS The Fabric of the Cosmos 3 of 4 Quantum Leap Positive Algorithms 65K views 1 year ago 1:35:15 NOW PLAYING MDAS Sept 2023, The Fascinating Journey of Photons from the Big Bang to Us, Boryana Hadzhiyska, UCB Mount Diablo Astronomical Society MDAS 590 views 3 weeks ago 1:47:10 NOW PLAYING the Hidden Treasures of Royal Baroque Music!! BACH, VIVALDI, CORELLI.. Chamber Music 287K views 5 months ago 1:00:30 NOW PLAYING Quantum Physics Explained! God Said, Let There Be Light: And There Was Light. Living Faith Church 2.7K views 1 year ago 3:21:00 NOW PLAYING The Search For Elusive Planets is Over | Space Documentary | 3 Decades of Research of X File Mystery TV - Quantum Universe 7M views 2 years ago 3:35:53 NOW PLAYING Bizarre Journey to the Outer Solar System DOCUMENTARY BOXSET These Planets Continue to Mystify Us TV - Quantum Universe 13M views 2 years ago 1:50:11 NOW PLAYING Einstein's Big Idea indywaves606 52K views 2 years ago 21:55 NOW PLAYING 光是什麽?為何特斯拉說光是宇宙的起源?| 天天觀世界(探秘,宇宙文明,未解之謎,量子,物理學,科普,光速,愛因斯坦,知識) 天天觀世界 270K views 7 months ago 58:18 NOW PLAYING CIA full report on Brain Synchronization, Energy, Manifestation and the Holographic Universe Video Advice 1.1M views 1 year ago 1:40:02 NOW PLAYING 我们被史学家们骗了3000年？揭开正史不敢记载的真相，历史系列合集，1小时中间无广告 [脑洞乌托邦 | 小乌副频道 | 小乌 TV ] 小乌副频道 466K views 9 days ago 47:21 NOW PLAYING 山口淑子特集 ( NETにっぽんの歌よりノーカットで）1976 terayama green ward 12K views 1 year ago 49:55 NOW PLAYING 改变中国司法进程的3大奇案！1小时中间无广告合集 [脑洞乌托邦 | 小乌副频道 | 小乌 TV ] 小乌副频道 47K views 18 hours ago New 33:33 NOW PLAYING LONGEVITY: The Science of Aging and How to Turn On Your Longevity Genes to Live Longer Rajsree Nambudripad, MD 252K views 8 months ago 1:15:10 NOW PLAYING Początki judaizmu – z jakich kultów zrodził się potężny Bóg Izraela? | Łukasz Niesiołowski-Spanò Radio Naukowe 246K views 1 month ago 1:22:36 NOW PLAYING Aliens On The Moon: The Truth Exposed | Conspiracy Theory | Absolute Documentaries Absolute Documentaries 4.8M views 1 year ago 26:49 NOW PLAYING The Four Noble Truths Of The Buddha Explained SEEKER TO SEEKER 286K views 8 months ago 53:42 NOW PLAYING Petra: Lost City of Stone | Full Documentary | NOVA | PBS NOVA PBS Official 1M views 4 months ago 1:45:16 NOW PLAYING The HISTORY of MATHEMATICS. Documentary MIK 1M views 8 months ago 24:44 NOW PLAYING 習近平與普京會面，曝出中俄貿易秘密；一帶一路論壇，參會各方有何圖謀；中共軍機15次攔截美國飛機，視頻圖像曝光；普京一帶一路論壇演講，歐洲代表離場；五眼聯盟罕見聯合聲明，譴責中共【 #中國禁聞 】 新唐人電視台 62K views 4 days ago New 24:44 NOW PLAYING Roger Penrose: " Time Doesn't Exist And Big Bang Wrong" Space Wind 19K views 5 days ago New 56:02 NOW PLAYING Undaunted: The Forgotten Giants of the Allegheny Observatory YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2013 Free with ads TV-PG 1:23:22 NOW PLAYING Wheel of Time YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2021 Free with ads TV-PG 56:50 NOW PLAYING Moon Shots YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2016 Free with ads 1:40:13 NOW PLAYING Girl With a Pearl Earring YouTube Movies & TV Drama • 2003 Free with ads PG-13 1:32:23 NOW PLAYING Singularity YouTube Movies & TV Science fiction • 2017 Free with ads PG-13 51:03 NOW PLAYING Is Anybody Out There? YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2023 Free with ads 1:43:02 NOW PLAYING Tower to the People: Tesla's Dream at Wardenclyffe YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2016 Free with ads 42:23 NOW PLAYING Alien Contact: Triangle Phenomenon YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2024 Free with ads 2:34:34 NOW PLAYING PBS.Nova.Becoming.Human.2010.155Min FiveDigitCreature 66K views 6 years ago 2:40:39 NOW PLAYING Documentary - The Buddha - PBS Documentary (Narrated by Richard Gere) Dhamma in English 1.2M views 8 years ago 7:01 NOW PLAYING Einstein's Wisdom: 35 Quotes that Shaped Our World Inspiring Quotes 5 views 13 days ago 5:27 NOW PLAYING The Earth's Best-Kept Secret: The Hidden Continent's Discovery after 375 years Pioneer's Corner 1.3K views 7 days ago 10:19 NOW PLAYING Michio Kaku Explains The Mysteries of String Theory & Quantum Physics Science Time 252K views 8 months ago 44:32 NOW PLAYING The Universe: Secrets of the Sun (S1, E1) | Full Episode HISTORY 290K views 7 months ago 3:29 NOW PLAYING How to take a life-changing journey with Pico Iyer TED 17K views 6 months ago 46:18 NOW PLAYING TorCHI | Fahimeh Rajabiyazdi - How Machine Learning Transparency Affects Decision Making TorCHI 5 views 8 hours ago New 56:43 NOW PLAYING 50 Universal Laws That Affect Reality | Law of Attraction Conscious Power 3.5M views 5 years ago 1:31:17 NOW PLAYING James Cameron's Deepsea Challenge 3D YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2014 Free with ads PG 2:02:10 NOW PLAYING Inner Worlds, Outer Worlds YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2013 Free with ads Unrated 1:00:04 NOW PLAYING Bitcoin: The End of Money as We Know It YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2016 Free with ads 1:41:10 NOW PLAYING Life to Afterlife: I Died Now What YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2021 Free with ads 1:25:24 NOW PLAYING Trust Machine: The Story of Blockchain YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2020 Free with ads TV-PG 55:14 NOW PLAYING Avatars of The Astral Worlds YouTube Movies & TV Documentary • 2021 Free with ads 4:56:45 NOW PLAYING 一口氣看完歴史題材電視劇《朱元璋》全集，了解這位從乞丐佈衣到開國皇帝的傳奇一生。 橘子解說 - Orange Commentary 29K views 6 months ago 3:47:32 NOW PLAYING 一口气看完94版《三国演义》下，9.6分的封神之作，无法被超越的天花板，有生之年必看的经典 追剧大司马 4K views 3 weeks ago 2:43:39 NOW PLAYING 一口气看完张涵予版《水浒传》下，耗资4.5亿的磅礴之作，口碑爆棚阵容强悍，半个娱乐圈的帅哥都请来了 追剧大司马 24K views 2 months ago 3:07:12 NOW PLAYING 一口气看完94版《三国演义》上，9.6分的封神之作，无法被超越的天花板，有生之年必看的经典 追剧大司马 17K views 6 days ago New 1:42:03 NOW PLAYING 一口气看完《孙子兵法与三十六计》上，庞涓“笑里藏刀”，孙膑“假疾不癫”，一计一集斗智斗勇，两位军事大家开杀了 追剧大司马 542K views 3 months ago 12:08 NOW PLAYING Scientists Just Discovered WHY SPACE IS DARK!! TOREM 11K views 8 days ago 1:48:21 NOW PLAYING 一口气看完范版《武媚娘传奇》，有颜有沟还有小鲜肉，还原大唐的美颜盛世 追剧大司马 244K views 4 months ago 42:32 NOW PLAYING How worlds end, and why, Part 2 The Five Principles of Organized Complexity 130 views 1 day ago New 25:41 NOW PLAYING 以色列地面作戰在等什麼？拜登承諾千億美元打敗俄哈，保台海平安，卻露出一大破綻；美軍紅海攔截導彈和無人機，戰爭升級讓無法避免；五角大樓對共軍評估曝其巨大威脅及弱點【江峰漫談20231022第753期】 江峰时刻 100K views 5 hours ago New 43:36 NOW PLAYING Humanity is not that simple | Yuval Noah Harari & Pedro Pinto Yuval Noah Harari 443K views 4 months ago 1:05:45 NOW PLAYING The Whole History of the Earth and Life 【Finished Edition】 Kaoru GreenEmerald 16M views 4 years ago 1:27:55 NOW PLAYING Sir Simon Rattle conducts the Australian World Orchestra, Bruckner Symphony No. 8 2015 Australian World Orchestra 59K views 4 years ago 2:32:39 NOW PLAYING The ENTIRE History of Human Civilizations | Ancient to Modern (4K Documentary) Beginning To Now 1.9M views 2 months ago 1:35:06 NOW PLAYING Willard YouTube Movies & TV Horror • 1971 Free with ads PG 34:29 NOW PLAYING 《耶路撒冷三千年》“圣城”的前世今生，三教圣地的争夺史 #历史 #宗教 #耶路撒冷 Mainland News 196K views 3 months ago 1:31:28 NOW PLAYING Discontinued YouTube Movies & TV Science fiction • 2023 Free with ads TV-14 31:17 NOW PLAYING 620 NLO eng dme 68 views 5 days ago New