Diamond Sutra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Frontispiece of the Chinese Diamond Sūtra, the oldest known dated printed book in the world
Part of a series on
Mahāyāna Buddhism
Buddha inside lotus
The Diamond Sūtra (Sanskrit: Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra) is a Mahāyāna (Buddhist) sūtra from the Prajñāpāramitā sutras or 'Perfection of Wisdom' genre. Translated into a variety of languages over a broad geographic range, the Diamond Sutra is one of the most influential Mahayana sutras in East Asia, and it is particularly prominent within the Chan (or Zen) tradition,[1] along with the Heart Sutra.
A copy of the Tang-dynasty Chinese version of the Diamond Sūtra was found among the Dunhuang manuscripts in 1900 by Daoist monk Wang Yuanlu and sold to Aurel Stein in 1907.[2] They are dated back to 11 May 868.[3] It is, in the words of the British Library, "the earliest complete survival of a dated printed book."[4]
It is also the first creative work with an explicit public domain dedication, as its colophon at the end states that it was created "for universal free distribution."[5]

Title[edit]

The Sanskrit title for the sūtra is the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, which may be translated roughly as the "Vajra Cutter Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra" or "The Perfection of Wisdom Text that Cuts Like a Thunderbolt".[1] In English, shortened forms such as Diamond Sūtra and Vajra Sūtra are common. The title relies on the power of the vajra (diamond or thunderbolt, but also an abstract term for a powerful weapon) to cut things as a metaphor for the type of wisdom that cuts and shatters illusions to get to ultimate reality.[1] The sutra is also called by the name "Triśatikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra" (300 lines Perfection of Insight sutra).
The Diamond Sūtra is highly regarded in a number of Asian countries with traditions of Mahayana Buddhism.[1] Translations of this title into the languages of some of these countries include:
  • Sanskrit: वज्रच्छेदिकाप्रज्ञापारमितासूत्र, Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra
  • Chinese: Jingang Borepoluomiduo Jing 金剛般若波羅蜜多經; shortened to Jingang Jing 金剛經
  • Japanese: 金剛般若波羅蜜多経, Kongō hannya haramita kyō, shortened to Kongō-kyō 金剛経
  • Korean: 금강반야바라밀경, geumgang banyabaramil gyeong, shortened to geumgang gyeong 금강경
  • Mongolian: Yeke kölgen sudur[6]
  • Vietnamese Kim cương bát-nhã-ba-la-mật-đa kinh, shortened to Kim cương kinh
  • Tibetan འཕགས་པ་ཤེས་རབ་ཀྱི་ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པ་རྡོ་རྗེ་གཅོད་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ཐེག་པ་ཆེན་པོའི་མདོ།, Wylie: ’phags pa shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa rdo rje gcod pa zhes bya ba theg pa chen po’i mdo

History[edit]

Statue of Kumārajīva in front of the Kizil Caves in Kuqa, Xinjiang province, China
The exact date of the composition of the Diamond Sutra in Sanskrit is uncertain—arguments for the 2nd and 5th centuries have been made.[1] The first Chinese translation dates to the early 5th century, but, by this point, the 4th or 5th century monks Asanga and Vasubandhu seem to have already authored authoritative commentaries on its content.[1]
The Vajracchedika sutra was an influential work in the Mahayana Buddhist tradition. Early translations into a number of languages have been found in locations across Central and East Asia, suggesting that the text was widely studied and translated. In addition to Chinese translations, translations of the text and commentaries were made into Tibetan, and translations, elaborations, and paraphrases survive in a number of Central Asian languages.[1]
The first translation of the Diamond Sūtra into Chinese is thought to have been made in 401 by the venerated and prolific translator Kumārajīva.[7] Kumārajīva's translation style is distinctive, possessing a flowing smoothness that reflects his prioritization on conveying the meaning as opposed to precise literal rendering.[8] The Kumārajīva translation has been particularly highly regarded over the centuries, and it is this version that appears on the 868 Dunhuang scroll. It is the most widely used and chanted Chinese version.[9]
In addition to the Kumārajīva translation, a number of later translations exist. The Diamond Sūtra was again translated from Sanskrit into Chinese by Bodhiruci in 509, Paramārtha in 558, Dharmagupta (twice, in 590 and in 605~616), Xuanzang (twice, in 648 and in 660~663), and Yijing in 703.[10][11][12][13]
The Chinese Buddhist monk Xuanzang visited a Mahāsāṃghika-Lokottaravāda monastery at Bamiyan, Afghanistan, in the 7th century. Using Xuanzang's travel accounts, modern archaeologists have identified the site of this monastery.[14] Birchbark manuscript fragments of several Mahāyāna sūtras have been discovered at the site, including the Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (MS 2385), and these are now part of the Schøyen Collection.[14] This manuscript was written in the Sanskrit language, and written in an ornate form of the Gupta script.[14] This same Sanskrit manuscript also contains the Medicine Buddha Sūtra (Bhaiṣajyaguruvaiḍūryaprabhārāja Sūtra).[14]
The Diamond Sūtra gave rise to a culture of artwork, sūtra veneration, and commentaries in East Asian Buddhism. By the end of the Tang Dynasty (907) in China there were over 80 commentaries written on it (only 32 survive), such as those by prominent Chinese Buddhists like Sengzhao, Xie Lingyun, Zhiyi, Jizang, Kuiji and Zongmi.[15][1] Copying and recitation of the Diamond Sutra was a widespread devotional practice, and stories attributing miraculous powers to these acts are recorded in Chinese, Japanese, Tibetan, and Mongolian sources.[1]
One of the best known commentaries is the Exegesis on the Diamond Sutra by Huineng, the Sixth Patriarch of the Chan School.[16] The Diamond Sutra features prominently in the Platform Sutra, the religious biography of Huineng, where hearing its recitation is supposed to have triggered the enlightening insight that led Huineng to abandon his life as a woodcutter to become a Buddhist monk.[1]

Contents[edit]

A traditional pocket-sized folding edition of the Diamond Sūtra in Chinese
The Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sutra contains the discourse of the Buddha to a senior monk, Subhuti.[17] Its major themes are anatman (not-self), the emptiness of all phenomena (though the term 'śūnyatā' itself does not appear in the text),[18] the liberation of all beings without attachment and the importance of spreading and teaching the Diamond sutra itself. In his commentary on the Diamond Sūtra, Hsing Yun describes the four main points from the sūtra as giving without attachment to self, liberating beings without notions of self and other, living without attachment, and cultivating without attainment.[19] According to Shigenori Nagamoto the major goal of the Diamond sutra is: "an existential project aiming at achieving and embodying a non-discriminatory basis for knowledge" or "the emancipation from the fundamental ignorance of not knowing how to experience reality as it is."[20]
In the sūtra, the Buddha has finished his daily walk to Sravasti with the monks to gather offerings of food, and he sits down to rest. Elder Subhūti comes forth and asks the Buddha: "How, Lord, should one who has set out on the bodhisattva path take his stand, how should he proceed, how should he control the mind?"[21] What follows is a dialogue regarding the nature of the 'perfection of insight' (Prajñāpāramitā) and the nature of ultimate reality (which is illusory and empty). The Buddha begins by answering Subhuti by stating that he will bring all living beings to final nirvana – but that after this "no living being whatsoever has been brought to extinction".[21] This is because a bodhisattva does not see beings through reified concepts such as 'person', 'soul' or 'self', but sees them through the lens of perfect understanding, as empty of inherent, unchanging self.
A Nepalese sculpture of a vajra
The Buddha continues his exposition with similar statements which use negation to point out the emptiness of phenomena, merit, the Dharma (Buddha's teaching), the stages of enlightenment and the Buddha himself. Japanese Buddhologist, Hajime Nakamura, calls this negation the 'logic of not' (Sanskrit: na prthak).[20] Further examples of the Diamond sutra's via negativa include statements such as:[21]
  • As far as ‘all dharmas’ are concerned, Subhuti, all of them are dharma-less. That is why they are called ‘all dharmas.’
  • Those so-called ‘streams of thought,’ Subhuti, have been preached by the Tathagata as streamless. That is why they are called ‘streams of thought.’
  • ‘All beings,’ Subhuti, have been preached by the Tathagata as beingless. That is why they are called ‘all beings.’
The Buddha is generally thought to be trying to help Subhūti unlearn his preconceived, limited notions of the nature of reality. Emphasizing that all phenomena are ultimately illusory, he teaches that true enlightenment cannot be grasped until one has set aside attachment to them in any form.[citation needed]
Another reason why the Buddha makes use of negation is because language reifies concepts and this can lead to attachment to those concepts, but true wisdom is seeing that nothing is fixed or stable, hence according to the Diamond sutra thoughts such as "I have obtained the state of an Arhat" or "I will bring living beings to nirvana" does not even occur in an enlightened one's mind because this would be "seizing upon a self...seizing upon a living being, seizing upon a soul, seizing upon a person."[21] Indeed, the sutra goes on to state that anyone who says such things should not be called a bodhisattva. According to David Kalupahana the goal of the Diamond sutra is "one colossal attempt to avoid the extremist use of language, that is, to eliminate any ontological commitment to concepts while at the same time retaining their pragmatic value, so as not to render them totally empty of meaning."[18] Kalupahana explains the negation of the Diamond sutra by seeing an initial statement as an erroneous affirmation of substance or selfhood, which is then critiqued ("'all dharmas' are dharmaless"), and then finally reconstructed ("that is why they are called 'all dharmas'") as being conventional and dependently originated. Kalupahana explains this final reconstruction as meaning: "that each concept, instead of either representing a unique entity or being an empty term, is a substitute for a human experience which is conditioned by a variety of factors. As such, it has pragmatic meaning and communicative power without being absolute in any way."[18] According to Paul Harrison the Diamond sutra's central argument here is that "all dharmas lack a self or essence, or to put it in other words, they have no core ontologically, they only appear to exist separately and independently by the power of conventional language, even though they are in fact dependently originated."[22]
The mind of someone who practices the Prajñāpāramitā or 'perfection of insight' is then a mind free from fixed substantialist or 'self' concepts:
"However, Lord, the idea of a self will not occur to them, nor will the idea of a living being, the idea of a soul, or the idea of a person occur. Why is that? Any such idea of a self is indeed idealess, any idea of a living being, idea of a soul, or idea of a person is indeed idealess. Why is that? Because the Buddhas and Lords are free of all ideas."[21]
Throughout the teaching, the Buddha repeats that successful memorization and elucidation of even a four-line extract of it is of incalculable merit, better than giving an entire world system filled with gifts and can bring about enlightenment. Section 26 (of the Chinese version) also ends with a four-line gatha:
All conditioned phenomena
Are like a dream, an illusion, a bubble, a shadow,
Like dew or a flash of lightning;
Thus we shall perceive them.”[23]
Paul Harrison's translation (of the Sanskrit version) states:[21]
"A shooting star, a clouding of the sight, a lamp, An illusion, a drop of dew, a bubble, A dream, a lightning’s flash, a thunder cloud— This is the way one should see the conditioned."

Dunhuang block print[edit]

See also: History of printing
Elder Subhūti addresses the Buddha. Detail from the Dunhuang block print
There is a wood block printed copy in the British Library which, although not the earliest example of block printing, is the earliest example which bears an actual date.
The extant copy is in the form of a scroll about 5 meters (16 ft) long. The archaeologist Sir Marc Aurel Stein purchased it in 1907 in the walled-up Mogao Caves near Dunhuang in northwest China from a monk guarding the caves – known as the "Caves of the Thousand Buddhas".
The colophon, at the inner end, reads:
Reverently made for universal free distribution by Wang Jie on behalf of his two parents on the 15th of the 4th moon of the 9th year of Xiantong [11 May 868].[clarification needed]
In 2010 UK writer and historian Frances Wood, head of the Chinese section at the British Library, Mark Barnard, conservator at the British Library, and Ken Seddon, professor of chemistry at Queen's University, Belfast, were involved in the restoration of its copy of the book.[24][25][26] The British Library website allows readers to view the Diamond Sutra in its entirety.[27]

Selected English translations[edit]

AuthorTitlePublisherNotesYearISBN
Max MüllerThe Vagrakkhedika or diamond-cutter, in Buddhist Mahayana Texts (Sacred Books of the East), F. Max Muller et al.Oxford University PressTranslation of the Vajracchedikā prajñāpāramitā from Sanskrit. Based on Muller's edition, the first Sanskrit edition published in the West, based on four Sanskrit manuscripts, one from Tibet, one from China, and two from Japan.1894
Daisetz Teitaro SuzukiThe Diamond SutraVariousTranslation of the Diamond Sutra1934
Schopen, GregoryThe Manuscript of the Vajracchedikā Found at Gilgit, in Studies in the Literature of the Great Vehicle: Three Mahāyāna Buddhist Texts, ed. by L. O. Gómez and J. A. SilkCenters for South and Southeast AsiaTranslation of the Diamond Sutra from the Sanskrit Gilgit manuscript1989ISBN 978-0891480549
Thich Nhat HanhThe Diamond that Cuts Through IllusionParallax PressThe Diamond Sutra with a Vietnamese Thiền commentary1992ISBN 0-938077-51-1
Mu SoengThe Diamond Sutra: Transforming the Way We Perceive the WorldWisdom PublicationsTranslation of the Diamond Sutra with commentary2000ISBN 978-0861711604
Edward ConzeBuddhist Wisdom: The Diamond Sutra and The Heart SutraRandom HouseThe Diamond Sutra and The Heart Sutra, along with commentaries on the texts and practices of Buddhism2001ISBN 978-0375726002
Michael RoachThe Diamond Cutter, An Exalted Sutra of the Greater Way on the Perfection of WisdomTibetan-English edition, translated from the Tibetan translation of Shilendra Bodhi.2001
Red PineThe Diamond Sutra: The Perfection of Wisdom; Text and Commentaries Translated from Sanskrit and ChineseCounterpointThe Diamond Sutra, translated from the Sanskrit (mostly from the editions by Max Muller and Edward Conze) with selections of Indian and Chán commentary from figures such as Asanga, Vasubandhu, Huineng, Linji and Chiang Wei-nung (1871–1938).2001ISBN 1-58243-256-2
Hsuan HuaA General Explanation: The Vajra Prajna Paramita SutraBuddhist Text Translation Society2002ISBN 0881394300
Nan Huai-ChinThe Diamond Sutra ExplainedPrimodia Media2004ISBN 0-9716561-2-6
A.F. Price and Wong Mou-LamDiamond Sutra and the Sutra of Hui-nengShambhala ClassicsTranslation of the Diamond Sutra and Platform Sutra2005ISBN 978-1590301371
Paul HarrisonVajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā: A New English Translation of the Sanskrit Text Based on Two Manuscripts from Greater GandhāraHermes PublishingTranslation of the Diamond Sutra from the Sanskrit (compiled from Gilgit and the Schøyen collection manuscripts)2006
Burton Watson"The Diamond Sutra"The Eastern Buddhist NEW SERIES, Vol. 41, No. 1Translated and introduced by Watson, based on the modern Japanese annotated translation by NAKAMURA Hajime 中村元 and KINO Kazuyoshi 紀野一義 Hannya shingyō; Kongō hannyakyō (Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten, 1960).2010

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j Schopen, Gregory (2004). "Diamond Sutra". MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism. 1. New York: MacMillan Reference USA. pp. 227–28. ISBN 0-02-865719-5.
  2. ^ Wenjie Duan (1 January 1994). Dunhuang Art: Through the Eyes of Duan Wenjie. Abhinav Publications. p. 52. ISBN 978-81-7017-313-7.
  3. ^ Soeng, Mu (15 June 2000). Diamond Sutra: Transforming the Way We Perceive the World. Wisdom Publications. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-8617-1160-4. Archived from the original on 3 January 2014. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
  4. ^ "Online Gallery – Sacred Texts: Diamond Sutra". Bl.uk British Library. 30 November 2003. Archived from the original on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 1 April 2010.
  5. ^ Pollock, Rufus (2006). "The Value of the Public Domain" (PDF). Institute for Public Policy Research.
  6. ^ "Manuscript of a Mongolian Sūtra". World Digital Library. Retrieved 22 June2014.
  7. ^ "The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalog (T 235)". A. Charles Muller. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  8. ^ Nattier, Jan (1992). "The Heart Sūtra: A Chinese Apocryphal Text?". Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. 15 (2): 153–223.
  9. ^ Yongyou Shi (2010). The Diamond Sūtra in Chinese Culture. Los Angeles: Buddha's Light Publishing. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-932293-37-1.
  10. ^ "The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalog (T 236)". A. Charles Muller. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  11. ^ "The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalog (T 237)". A. Charles Muller. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  12. ^ "The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalog (T 220,9)". A. Charles Muller. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  13. ^ "The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive Catalog (T 239)". A. Charles Muller. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Schøyen Collection: Buddhism". Retrieved 23 June 2012.
  15. ^ Yongyou Shi (2010). The Diamond Sūtra in Chinese Culture. Los Angeles: Buddha's Light Publishing. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-932293-37-1.
  16. ^ Hui Neng; Cleary, Thomas (1998). The Sutra of Hui-neng, Grand Master of Zen: With Hui-neng's Commentary on the Diamond Sutra. Shambhala Publications. ISBN 9781570623486.
  17. ^ Buswell, Robert Jr; Lopez, Donald S. Jr., eds. (2013). "Subhuti", in Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 862. ISBN 9780691157863.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b c Kalupahana, David J. A History of Buddhist Philosophy, page 156.
  19. ^ Hsing Yun (2012). Four Insights for Finding Fulfillment: A Practical Guide to the Buddha's Diamond Sūtra. Buddha's Light Publishing. p. 87. ISBN 978-1-932293-54-8.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Nagatomo, Shigenori (2000). The Logic of the Diamond Sutra: A is not A, therefore it is A; Asian Philosophy 10 (3), 217–244
  21. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Harrison, Paul. Vajracchedika Prajñaparamita Diamond Cutting Transcendent Wisdom
  22. ^ Harrison, Paul. (2006) 'Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā: A New English Translation of the Sanskrit Text Based on Two Manuscripts from Greater Gandhāra', in Buddhist Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection (Vol. III). Hermes Publishing, Oslo, p.139.
  23. ^ "The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra". Chung Tai Translation Committee. Archived from the original on 30 April 2015. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  24. ^ "Restoring the world's oldest book, the Diamond Sutra". BBC. 5 December 2010. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  25. ^ Wood, Francis; Barnard, Mark. "Restoration of the Diamond Sutra". IDP News(38): 4–5. Archived from the original on 5 April 2013. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  26. ^ "Conserving the Diamond Sutra". IDP UK Video. 31 January 2013. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
  27. ^ "Copy of Diamond Sutra". bl.uk. Archived from the original on 3 June 2004.

Further reading[edit]

  • Cole, Alan (2005). Text as Father: Paternal Seductions in Early Mahayana Buddhist Literature, Berkeley: U Cal Press, pp. 160–196. For a close reading of the text's rhetoric, see chapter 4, entitled "Be All You Can't Be, and Other Gainful Losses in the Diamond Sutra."
  • William Gemmell, transl. (1912). The Diamond Sutra, London: Trübner.
  • Joyce Morgan and Conrad Walters (2011). Journeys on the Silk Road: a desert explorer, Buddha’s secret library, and the unearthing of the world’s oldest printed book, Picador Australia, ISBN 978-1-4050-4041-9.
  • Agócs, Tamás (2000). The Diamondness of the Diamond Sutra. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 53, (1/2), 65–77

External links[edit]