All Nobel laureates in Physics in History (1901–2025)

All Nobel laureates in Physics in History (1901–2025) Data Spectrum 22.3K subscribers Subscribe 578 Share Clip Save Download 96,141 views May 15, 2025 #MarieCurie #NobelPrize #Physics Discover the complete list of Nobel Prize winners in Physics from 1901 to 2025. This video highlights the greatest minds who have contributed significantly to the field of physics, including their groundbreaking discoveries and innovations. Whether you're a student, researcher, or curious learner, this informative timeline will enhance your knowledge of the most prestigious awards in science. 🌍 Learn about legendary physicists like Albert Einstein, Marie Curie, Richard Feynman, and many more who shaped our understanding of the universe. 🔔 Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more educational content! 📅 Timeline Covered: 1901 to 2025 📖 Category: Education / Science / Physics Sources of Data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of... https://www.britannica.com/science/Wi... #AlbertEinstein #MarieCurie # RichardFeynman #Physics #NobelPrize #Comparison All Nobel laureates in Physics in History (1901-2025) All Nobel Laureates in Physics (1901–2025) Complete List of Nobel Physics Laureates (1901–2025) Nobel Prize Winners in Physics Throughout History (1901–2025) All-Time Nobel Laureates in Physics (1901–2025) Nobel Prize Winners in Physics: A Complete List (1901–2025) Music 4 songs Take You Home Tonight Vibe Tracks Take You Home Tonight Stardrive Jeremy Blake Stardrive URL Melt Unicorn Heads Tere Bina Mere Sanam 2.0 Kurt Cheel Kurt Music Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript Data Spectrum 22.3K subscribers Videos About 85 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @janfelchner1543 2 days ago Maria Curie was Polish, and her surname was Skłodowska-Curie 3 Reply @RolandJohansson-eu1sm 10 days ago Herbert Kroemer (Germany) and Jack Kilby (USA), winner 2000, look surprisingly (exactly) alike! 4 Reply @EK-gr9gd 2 weeks ago Einstein 1921: Photo electric effect. Nothing ambiguous! 10 Reply @roddos 2 weeks ago Maria Skłodowska-Curie, Polka. 13 Reply 8 replies @constancerijsdijk9332 1 month ago (edited) You have Russia/UK for André Geim, so why not Poland/France for Marie Curie and Netherlands/USA voor Nicolaas Bloembergen (and I wouldn't be surprised if there were more). Also, Herbert Kroemer and Jack Kilby (2000) got the same photo (= Kroemer). 7 Reply @joostprins3381 11 hours ago Nicolaas Bloembergen was Dutch born, Dutch schooled and married a Dutch woman. They got the American Nationality in 1958, he was 38 at that moment. Reply @rsassine 1 month ago Good presentation BUT the music sucks real bad 6 Reply @manuelalejandrorincon3905 3 weeks ago Many nobel winners from the USA weren't even born there 4 Reply 1 reply @johnjohnson5818 4 weeks ago Germany is well represented. 4 Reply @krzysztofc7703 2 weeks ago There are a lot of mistakes in this list. Next time you should try harder. 3 Reply @tokajileo5928 1 month ago Pensias and Wilson got the prize for accidentally discovering CMB but Gamow who predicted it did not receive it. 5 Reply @Gatien1214 1 month ago Becquerel : Germany ? Seriously... 4 Reply @tokajileo5928 1 month ago some of the reasons are very vague like Einstein. he got it for explaining the photoelectric effect. also the persons have nationality and citizenship, not clear which one is here. be precise man. 10 Reply @劉安安妮 9 days ago THANKS TO MONTESQUIEU, HUMAN LEARNS HIS OWN PHYLOSOPHY IS AS HUMBLE AS A PARTICLE IN THE UNIVERSE❤ Reply @pbx5911_2 13 days ago Why Engineers are not given Nobel prize the engineer who invented Jet Engine Internet for their inventions 1 Reply @SakaldevYadav-k3g 3 days ago All greatest i salute Reply @prototropo 10 days ago Very interesting to see how, as the years marched on, the Prize came to be shared by two or three physicists, rather than a single heroic figure in the early years. I'm not sure if it's a belated recognition of real-life collaboration by the Nobel Committee, or if collaboration really did become the winning approach to scientific advances. Chandrasekhar, whose work is beyond reproach, is the most deserving of the Prize for the appallingly unprofessional, unscientific opposition he suffered at the hands of Eddington (a man I otherwise admire very much). Meanwhile, I feel my chances for a Nobel, and an Olympic Gold Medal, are slipping fast . . . yes, see now? I'm on the fading side of the Doppler shift . . . help!! 1 Reply @paweczarnota7324 1 month ago Maria SKŁODOWSKA Curie!!!Polka!!! 2 Reply 1 reply @joostprins3381 11 hours ago The one, really the one I miss… Sheldon Cooper! Reply @AJ_real 1 hour ago The Bose Einstein condensate, there's a 'cool' documentary about that one ahah Reply @hls6925 2 days ago (edited) You missed Francis Crick (UK), James Watson (USA), and Maurice Wilkins (UK), as Nobel Laurates in 1962 for their work on the discovery of the structure of DNA. Extremely important work! Why? How many more, I wonder. Reply 1 reply @varoonnone7159 2 weeks ago Ashkenazis ❤ 1 Reply @jarosawmalinowski7861 1 month ago