Harvard Scientist Beautifully Explains Quantum Entanglement and Non-Loca...

Harvard Scientist Beautifully Explains Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality Curt Jaimungal 435K subscribers Join Subscribe 2.2K Share Download Thanks Clip 113,306 views Feb 23, 2025 #theoreticalphysics #physics #science Main episode with Jacob Barandes: • Harvard Scientist: "There is No Quant... As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit https://www.economist.com/toe Join My New Substack (Personal Writings): https://curtjaimungal.substack.com Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/SpotifyTOE Become a YouTube Member (Early Access Videos): / @theoriesofeverything Support TOE on Patreon: / curtjaimungal Twitter: / toewithcurt Discord Invite: / discord #science #physics #theoreticalphysics Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript Curt Jaimungal 435K subscribers Videos About Support Twitter Discord Dedicated Subredddit Shop the Curt Jaimungal store The Voices - Colors Classic Long Sleeve Tee $30.00 Spring We're not fighting - Color Classic Long Sleeve Tee $27.56 Spring We're not fighting - Color Classic Long Sleeve Tee $30.00 Spring TOE Logo Mug Black Black Mug $25.00 Spring Being Mode and Having Mode Mug Black Mug $25.00 Spring voices - White Premium Pullover Hoodie $45.00 Spring 523 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @ronanfurlong2708 10 days ago I've read about 20 different explanations/analyses re: entanglement and Bell's inequality in books by Sean Carroll, Adam Becker, Jim Al-Khalil, Anton Zeilinger, Brian Greene, Brian Cox, Marcus Chown, David Albert, Lenny Susskind, Philip Ball, Anil Anathaswamy, Joanne Baker, and even Andrew Whitaker (John Bell's biographer) .... and I've never encountered anything as lucid and succinct on the topic as the first 8 minutes and 20 seconds of this video are. Well done and thank you! 32 Reply 12 replies @martifingers 11 days ago Dr Barandes clarity makes me feel as if I might just be able to understand these difficult issues. 13 Reply @bunberrier 12 days ago (edited) "That didnt help at all!" -Spongebob, after Patrick told him the story of the entangled barnacle. 24 Reply @indovash 12 days ago 6:18 Jacob: "So EPR basically establishes that there's a logical fork. Either, you allow faster than light [causal] influences of some kind..or there are hidden extra parameters, and the wave function, the standard approach to quantum theory, is incomplete. ... That's where Bell starts. In 1964, he says, ...either you have non-local [causal]...influence or there's more to the story than just the wave function. What Bell wanted to do was show that...that fork was...not really there. ... So, in other words, Bell is trying to close a possible way out of the non-local causation. ...This theorem has gone through a giant game of Telephone. ...eventually people began thinking that what he did was prove there couldn't be hidden variables." 26 Reply 6 replies @MeisterFF 8 days ago There are no 2 separate entangled particle. There’s only one which appears separate to us in our dimension. That’s why it behaves singularly. 19 Reply 7 replies @reversefulfillment9189 12 days ago The Sun whispers in photons, eight minutes of flight through the void, only to dissolve in the wells of my eyes. Light, once born in nuclear fire, now dances in my cells, entangling star and seer in silent knowing. No distance divides us— for where its golden breath lingers, I too am woven into the cosmos. 52 Reply 7 replies @dr-me-u 3 days ago The key is that distance is not a factor 2 Reply @kcrooks7 9 days ago (edited) There are hidden structures. 7 Reply 1 reply @stevemaurer8120 12 days ago Barandes correctly states that Bell's Theorem only proves Non-locality, not the absence of hidden variables. Fine, so far. But then at 11:56 he argues that Bell's Inequality (proving non-locality) is just mathematical, not physical -- completely ignoring the Nobel Prize showing that is absolutely IS reflected in physical reality. 10 Reply 2 replies @Nevtech1898 12 days ago This conversation tangled my mind 9 Reply @troywahl9731 3 days ago There is a flaw in the argument: entangled systems have a coherence time associated with them, kind of like a half-life, that tells one how long the system is expected to remain entangled or in other terms how long before the system is perturbed by some uncontrolled outside factor. So there has to be some connection between the A-side and the B-side of the entangled system when the system is created, but as the sides of the system are separated from one another in the real world there is a finite non-zero chance that the system experiences an energy fluctuation because we can't perfectly isolate the system from the outside world and that is something not included in the thought experiments (which are perfectly defined). So the only thing one can say with absolute certainty about entangled systems is that if one measures the A-side then one knows what state the B-side was in when the system was created. It is this reason why people working one quantum computing go to extreme lengths to isolate their system from the outside world (better they do that, the better their computer works. AKA, they increase the coherence-time of their system). 1 Reply 1 reply @lordemed1 8 days ago i feel honored and quite fortunate to listen to Jacob Barandes. 1 Reply @jamestait324 8 days ago If you think of Spacetime as a dimensional framework, the cause-effect relationship of Entangled particles takes place outside the Framework. One sentence, you're welcome. 1 Reply @jrusnak69 6 days ago One thing that isn't talked about is that Bob and Alice are spatially related and therefore depending on what frame of reference one is in, Bob will measure first or alice would. There is no fixed sense of who measured first. In fact collapse of a wave function will violate conservation of probability in other crashes if reference. Such a discontinuous is in fact outside of the mathematics of quantum mechanics. So there is physics we haven't yet modeled or understand yet Reply @JuBerryLive 7 days ago It sounds like if bob makes a measurement on his entangled particle, he also makes a measurement on alice's particule. They are not separated (by distance they are, but they are still connected by some other... dimension maybe? idk) Reply @RodneyBartlett-sw7zh 6 days ago (edited) The video stated that something local has to be present to produce entanglement. This could be arrived at through a combination of cosmology's holographic principle and the universe being like a DVD. The holographic principle says the 3rd dimension results from information in a 2nd dimension. Prof Max Tegmark of USA'S MIT writes about the universe being mathematical. If the maths results from particles having Electric Dipole Moments and consequent binary digits, that 2nd dimension could be reprogrammed to delete space-time, and distance, between the centres of particles thus producing Cosmological Entanglement. In a Cosmic DVD, all time exists at once since the whole DVD exists. The entirety of space and time can thus be considered a local event with every particle in the universe being cosmologically entangled. Reply @michaelscott466 10 days ago There is no mystery here, only skewed perspective. Distance is an illusion. 2 Reply @eenkjet 12 days ago Wrong. “Since the interval between Alice’s and Bob’s measurements is space-like – non-local – it is always possible to find a frame of reference in which the order of measurements is reversed. So, in a reference frame travelling sufficiently fast from Alice towards Bob, it is Bob, and not Alice, who makes the first measurement.” Alan McKenzie 2 Reply 4 replies @IaN09876 11 days ago I can't understand what he's trying to say. Too many intertwined expressions. 2 Reply @ashnavabi 8 days ago Quantum mechanics still relies on spooky action at a distance. But a physical interpretation exists that can make sense of entanglement. Imagine a rod, where the top half is painted red and the bottom half is blue. If you are looking at one end of the rod, you will see a circle that’s half red and half blue. Now if you were spin the rod clockwise, an observer at the opposite end of the rope would see it spinning counterclockwise. This is a simplification of Bill Gaede’s “rope hypothesis”—that every atom in the universe is connected with a “rope” with two “threads”: an electric thread and a magnetic thread. The hypothesis provides a physical interpretation of a wide variety of otherwise disparate ideas, including the speed of light, Newton’s universal law of gravitation, Maxwell‘s equations, and more. The video below goes into detail about entanglement: https://youtu.be/fn2Rnc9_z3I 1 Reply @extrasocks 12 days ago I watch the full versions and then all the clips! 3 Reply @AlexTube2006 10 days ago Thanks Curt! 2 Reply @mikecappadocia5959 9 days ago (edited) I may not be taken seriously, but I had Salvia one time with my friends, and I saw those things in the thumbnail, but they were black rods with grey, translucent spheres on each end. They were connected like Kinex toys and moved together. We were sitting in a circle, and had then connected to us all... they were attached to my leg, and I tried kicking them off, lol. I've never seen anything that looked like them until right now. 3 Reply 1 reply @Burglecutter 10 days ago This professor is fantastic. 1 Reply @tvfytcrtcuyv877giu 12 days ago He usually explains why he does not believe something or why he does believe something, and I felt that he did not give his opinion on this one unless I am too tired and I need to rewatch it later 4 Reply 2 replies @ywtcc 9 days ago Isn't non locality simply a byproduct of having to infer position from measurement timings? Time and energy seem to be inseparable, when measured. If physics is to prioritize describing the universe in terms of energy, I'm pretty sure time is coming along for the ride. I'm not sure that energy would be a meaningful concept without it. 3 Reply @draghi 2 days ago (edited) If Alice can trigger a collapse of the wave function at Bob's location, why cannot she use a kind of pulse width modulation to transmit information? Which state each one measures is irrelevant, only the time between two consecutbive measurements becomes relevant. Reply @williambranch4283 12 days ago (edited) If space-time is emergent not fundamental then non-locality is allowed. I don't think we will ever get to planck units of space/time/mass. 4 Reply 3 replies @danielb1005 8 days ago Invite Sabina also please, let hears what she said too 2 Reply Curt Jaimungal · 1 reply @mujaku 10 days ago The problem with "entanglement speculation" is that we must assume local reality is true reality which is vibratory. But we still have not the slightest idea what it is that is vibrating. But maybe vibratory phenomena is really not acting in the way we imagine it. We've left something out. We can also speculate that vibratory phenomena are propagations/modulations upon an unknown field. With these vibratory phenomena and with our composite vibratory bodies we find ourselves in local reality almost like a simulation game (high-resolution immersion) of which we are not aware of. But could all these propagations are connected through a nonlocal field which seems antithetical to our local reality world? How to resolve this conflict? It might be easier than we imagine. What if we are ultimately this nonlocal reality mesmerized by local-reality and it's propagations including our cellular composite body? 2 Reply 1 reply @greaterqueller1426 11 days ago I wanted to put this idea somewhere. Basically, imagine placing particles in a grid and their entangled partners are in another grid, located at the same coordinates as their partner on the other grid. There is a device on the first grid that can change the spin of any particle. Software has been created to change the spin of particles that reside on coordinates that trace out an image of each individual letter when that letter is pressed on a keyboard. On the other grid, there is an individual circuit attached to every individual particle of which each sends a signal to a computer whenever the circuit turns on or off, activated by the spin of the particle. A virtual image of the grid (on a screen) will light up any coordinate position on the screen whose particle experiences a change in spin. So even though no one is directly measuring the spin of any particles (entanglement preserved), communication can still be transmitted. The AI couldn't tell me any reason (other than the technical hurdles, meaning the concept is theoretically sound) that this would not work. I'm sure there is a catch, but I would like someone who understands these things to explain it in a way that I understand. Or tell me it's feasible! Thanks! Reply 2 replies @mightylotan 12 days ago Now we're gonna have to deal with non-local Instagram influencers.. 50 Reply 22 replies @isaacgarza3307 10 days ago Quantum entanglement = Quantum Memory 2 Reply @SapienSpace 12 days ago Fascinating. I am most interested, though, in the actual experiment where Einstein says "God (Spinoza's God) does not play dice", the split beam of polarized light. 1 Reply @robmorgan1214 11 days ago (edited) I didn't learn Bell's theorem wrong... all the professors at Stanford knew this decades ago. I've never met a professor who misunderstood this pretty basic stuff... (primarily interact with experimental plasma, amo, lazor jokz, condensed matter, n nano doodz... we all noes this stuff.) 2 Reply @Achrononmaster 12 days ago Part-1. I love this meme that entanglement is the special feature of QM. Apart from Jacob's framework and the GPT framework, few other frameworks for QM realize or show manifestly that entanglement is the cause of superposition and interference, however... is it? See part-2, 1 Reply @haroldnowak2042 8 days ago The elephant in the room is: do entangled particles remain correlated when the measurements are separated by large distances? I raise this question because direction may not be conserved with distance. So we know, for example, that A has spin up in the x direction meaning B must have spin down in the x direction but over large distances the x direction becomes indeterminant. This means that the spin of B is unknown when we measure the spin of A. 1 Reply 3 replies @Larry000 11 days ago Mathematics is an image of the physical world. It is not the physical world. 3 Reply @Achrononmaster 12 days ago Part-2. anything stronger than correlation tends to imply at least weak causation. I know Jacob employs non-Reichenbach common cause, but the Indivisible Stochastic (ISQM) account of entanglement is not a causal explanation. In physics the onyl truly "causal" notion we have is spacetime and lightcone structure. You need to supply an account of spacetime cobordism structure to have a beautiful explanation of entanglement. Jacob's is only half-beautiful. He has the transition logic correct, but that is from one boundary of a cobordism straight to another boundary, nothing in-between. But there is something going on in-between (if we take scientific realism to be decent and wholesome (pun intended), which it is). 2 Reply 2 replies @enricofermi654 10 days ago His explanation of spooky action at a distance is most excellent. Near the beginning and afterword of David J. Griffith's " Introduction to QM" there is a nice mathematical and well put example by David Bohm on pion decay. Reply @GeoffMcMasters 9 days ago It seems silly to think that Alice’s oberservation are not relative to space and therefore Bob could write down the answers and they would not match Alice’s observations because neither are then relative to each other. 1 Reply @BrianThorne 7 days ago Hey curt i just heard someone explaining the red shift of the universe and said it's expanding but it sounds like we are slowing because the unversialty vs locality of expansion Reply @Spkr4TRUTH 15 hours ago If we are in a holographic projection, then entanglement could be a relationship between the membrane or the particle being projected into wave form. Reply @Knowledge.m3 12 days ago Ask him to explain how this even helps to "quantum compute" 2 Reply 1 reply @eyemallears2647 11 days ago At the start I was like “ok buddy I’m not a child”. Two sentences later I was like “ok, me watching this is pointless” 😂 25 Reply 9 replies @mertonhirsch4734 10 days ago (edited) 1) What if Alice measures A and Bob measures A prime (at the same time) then doesn't that let you know two things that shouldn't both be knowable, like position and momentum? 2) Would it matter which particle was accelerated in the separation, if only one was moved? 3) Is there a possibility that entangled particles are local through hyperspace? 1 Reply 2 replies @stevea8099 9 days ago It's simple, you don't need faster than light comunication. The two particles are controlled by a 3rd higher dimension variable to which both are linked to. Reply 1 reply @debugger4693 12 days ago I thought the stochastic theory would have some implication with explaining entanglement. 1 Reply @nenadmarkovic7770 11 days ago CHF 10.00 Danke! 1 Reply Curt Jaimungal · 3 replies @warp.9.scotty 9 days ago (edited) The speaker talks about "far away" as a description of spatial distance (x, y, z) between "systems" but if you consider the particles as being co-located at the same time coordinate in spacetime then there is zero distance between them in the temporal dimension. Language is somewhat deficient in describing this condition. 3 Reply 4 replies @Opticsjournal 8 days ago Harvard scientist ask everyone to read the EPR paper (~ 2:09): excellent recommendation... the EPR paper no where mention the words "entangled" or "entanglement." It was Erwin Schrödinger who first began to talk about two entangled systems at a distance. In this regard, Schrödinger erroneously believed that the measurements of A could "pilot" the measurements of B... and tormented himself with that thought. The main argument of EPR was that quantum mechanics was an "incomplete" theory and that a complete version of QM was possible. That gave rise to sterile hidden variable theories. Reply @kerimw14v 7 days ago thank you 1 Reply @ronaldkemp3952 11 days ago (edited) Quantum entanglement happens because when light information is added to the field produced by a star or collection of stars the information, be it color, temperature, spin direction, polarity, charge, age, etc., pertaining to the star it becomes "entangled" to all other previous light particles within the field, regardless of the size of the EM field. Thus when an observer say 40 billion light years away detects the distant star's light information, it's conveyed in a quantum instant. This is because light travels at c. When light travels at c to an outside observer measuring the star it's potential light information is entangled to all other information inside the field. The light information doesn't really exist until an observer measures it. And, if the distant star is receding away from the observer faster than light, then when the observer measures the light information it experiences both time dilation (zero time) and length contraction (zero distance). And according to the theory of relativity time is always relative to the observer. Thus the only solution is the observer measures the information produced by the distant star in an instant, regardless of distance. Hence, Einstein's famous quote "spooky action at a distance". Meaning the observer measures light information as it looks today, not how it looked in the past due to the relativistic effects of time. Is there any evidence that supports this postulate? Yes there is. In 2023, astronomers going over the Jades survey taken by the James Webb space Telescope astronomers discovered old, not young but old, fully grown spiral and elliptical galaxies, some up to 20 times larger than our own galaxy but further than a light distance of 14 billion light years away. Empirical evidence that light information DOES NOT take time to travel and that telescopes CANNOT see into the past. I proposed this postulate back in 2004 after I finished college and continued studying quantum field theory and quantum experiments. Scientists working at NASA were in the process of building the JWST and they kept claiming the telescope would act like a time machine, able to see into the universe's past. I wrote to them and told them Einstein's look-back time was incorrect, that telescopes can no more look into the past than microscopes can look in the future. I told them time is relative to the observer, not distant galaxies. They just argued with me, spouting how Einstein was right and I was wrong, laughed at me ridiculed and even insulted my intelligence. I had no proof because at the time telescopes could not see back in time far enough to show his look-back time prediction was wrong. I had to wait and see if the JWST would confirm or refute my postulate. In 2021, 3 months before the JWST was set to launch, I published the 6 book series SECRET UNIVERSE By RON KEMP. In the first book GRAVITY on page 48 I wrote "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." And that's exactly what the telescope found. So did NASA employees admit Einstein's look-back time was wrong and I was right all these years? No. Instead they began theorizing on multiple, parallel and cyclical universes, tired light, bubble universes and more trying to explain them. Still to this day they haven't yet figured them out. I was the only theorist who accurately predicted the JWST would not be able to look into the universe's past, and that it would find old, not young but old, fully grown galaxies, some larger than our own galaxy but further than a light distance of 14 billion light years away. Everyone else misinterpreted Einstein's field equations on gravity, the instant speed of light due to quantum entanglement, and James Maxwell's equations on EM fields by claiming telescopes are like time machines when they're not. I figured it all out, do you think I'll win a Nobel prize like Michio Kaku said? Nope, because it proves Einstein was wrong about look-back time. They'll never figure out why telescopes can't see into the past. 1 Reply 1 reply @david_porthouse 10 days ago Set up the Clauser/Aspect experiment in a velodrome, and different cyclists will perceive a different sequence of cause and effect as the measurements are made. What is being communicated in these experiments is in the nature of a one-time pad, as used in the Vernam cipher. It’s something more than just the fringes of a moire pattern, but something less than a true communication. The apparent randomness really is random, to the point of maximising the security of any one-time pad system generated by the measurements. With this level of randomness, every over-correlation is an uncontrollable one-off event, and the cyclists’ perception of the relativity of cause and effect does not raise any issues. If we want to tackle this as a computer simulation, the random number generator that we need to use can be arranged to be reseeded every time we press a button by reference to the time of pressing. We need to press a button to do a Lorentz transformation, but then it is a new random event that we will be looking at. We can never catch the simulation out on this matter of the relativity of cause and effect. Reply @supernaturalabilities 12 days ago (edited) At the 10:45 minute mark, he points out that Bell's paper has been widely misinterpreted. Bell himself, in later writings, expressed frustration over how his work was misunderstood. This is particularly striking, as I was shocked to discover how many prominent scientific theories seem to rest on misinterpreted data or experiments—misinterpretations that often appear intentional. A prime example is Edwin Hubble, who discovered redshift in 1929 but disagreed with its interpretation as evidence for the expanding universe theory. In fact, the redshift has been misinterpreted; the universe is not expanding as commonly believed. This misinterpretation has far-reaching consequences, as it undermines both the Big Bang theory and the concept of an initial singularity, both of which rely on this flawed assumption. 6 Reply 29 replies @jjay6764 5 days ago Entanglement and non-locality show there’s a fundamental awareness or consciousness that’s strong on a microscopic scale and becomes weaker as you scale up to classical sizes. So on a microscopic level it’s entanglement and on a classical scale it can be seen as twin telepathy. The sad thing about all of these theories is they want a physical or material explanation. They keep trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Tesla said the moment science starts to study the non-physical, they will learn more in a decade than they have for all of its existence. Sadly, I don’t think that day will come because so many scientists are stuck in the Plato’s cave of materialism and local realism. 💯💯 Reply @Mr.E.Shoppa 8 days ago Nobody I've seen has ever been able to make sense of this mind lagoon. Reply @supernaturalabilities 12 days ago In quantum mechanics, scientists do not isolate two entangled photons in the strict sense. Reply @GH-li3wj 9 days ago The problem with the EPR demonstration is the assumption that Alice and Bob have exactly the same measurement system, but this is never true. In fact, EPR assumes that Bob and Alice have the same ideal measurement equipment. Even though the quantum states are correlated for Bob and Alice, their measurements are independent. This is the meaning of the no-communication theorem. Also, Aspect has never made any polarization measurements, just take a look at his experiments in Physial reviews. Reply @excaliburhead 10 days ago This guy might be an even smoother talker than Sean Carroll , which I did not think was possible Reply @albertorasa6220 11 days ago For a particle, could "having a property" be a contextual statement? Bell's inequality would still apply to this kind of "hidden variable"? Reply @johnwm3047 8 days ago He entangled my mind across space and time (only 3 days, but still, pretty neat). Reply @saxtant 12 days ago Spatial Orientation of Bob and Alice is an unavoidable hidden variable. Measuring A Prime actually does rely on orientation. Reply 1 reply @123jkjk123 9 days ago The problem with angry, aggressive responses is they are used to justify angry, aggressive responses in return. Also when it's celebrated to be proud of African-American, women, Native-American, pretty much everyone's accomplishments but when it European/white men it's an embarrassment done by privilege, then there will be resentment (justified or not). The reason race relations haven't gotten better since Baldwin's time is EVERYONE's fault, not just one side or the other. 1 Reply @senkrouf 4 days ago isn the basis just a convenient choosen frame of reference? I dont find this mysterious at all. + Bell theorem proves that there is not a CONSTAT hidden variable, it doesnt talk about time dependant hidden variable , or space dependant hidden variables, or any other kind of hidden variables + entanglement happens at measure time or cooking time? I remember Sabine talking about it. Reply @MrHoojaszczyk 8 days ago It's electricity and plasma. Reply @hikashia.halfiah3582 12 days ago hey, where is the link to the paper? 1 Reply @mantasr 8 days ago I just don't understand how non locality is possible. Unless the wave function of the entangled particles spans the entire universe. Ir the quantum systems interact through a separate dimension parallel to the three spacial dimensions. Also why can't you deliver information this way ? What if Alice decides in advance with Bob that if she measures A it means yes, and if she measures A' it means no? Reply @itsjavaman 9 days ago (edited) Well, many questions. What is a quantum "system" when it comes to entanglement? Doesn't quantum steering break down over multiple attempts to manipulate the entangled perticles? At what point are the particles affected in chromodynamics? Could that mean that it matters the point in time when the measurement(s) happen. If the quantum fields have symmetry and they must equal 0, can't we or have we been able to measure their elasticity? How far does that extend? I'm curious and learning. Reply @AndrejDukic 7 days ago Turned on this video, turned on 2x immediately out of habit. Heard the first sentence. 0.75x. Reply @robertm3561 11 days ago What is ...stronger.., how you escape the situation is by considering a realistic possibility of for ex. underlying structure of the universe spread through infinity & having a carasterictic speed so great, that we are not able to detect it today? Reply @Jeremy-Ai 8 days ago Entanglement hmmmm ? Quantum Entanglement Hmmmm ? (Binary equivalent data suggests =uncommonly uncomfortable uncertainty universally (Trapped). “Do you seek to be trapped forever?… step right up … you are the next adventure on the price is wrong.” Reply @frankdimeglio8216 5 days ago Frank Martin DiMeglio has surpassed Newton and Einstein. Reply @abrogard142 8 days ago well I don't think he beautifully explains anything at all.. and a crucial bit he should explain he doesn't say anything about, I think. That's the fact that Alice decides to measure one of two non compatible parameters (or whatever they are). Such as momentum or location. That's the crucial bit isn't it? Well for the ignorant such as myself its easy to miss that and he spends no time on it at all. And all of the further stuff is fairly superfluous. 'collapses Bob's state' he says. We dunno what that means. I guess it means that before a measurement a thing is in an indeterminate state. Take a measurement and now you know either the momentum or the location (but not both - and now there's no chance of knowing the other one). The state has now 'collapsed' from indetermined to determined in in this one aspect. And here's the point: alice having collapsed hers and the base rule being Bob's will be the opposite then Bob's has to collapse accordingly. It could collapse this way or that way. Alice decides which way. It seems. And she either does that by sending a message or Bob somehow knew which she would choose. And that's as far as he goes with explanations I think. 1 Reply 1 reply @Activeight17 9 days ago I'm developing a new framework that recovers GR and QM formulas in a completely different way—without complexity or patchwork. From this approach, I derive the exact Higgs mass naturally, explaining why it has that precise value. Even fundamental concepts like uncertainty, probability, observation, wave-particle duality, half-spins, and entanglement—typically treated as axioms—emerge naturally from the framework. In a few weeks, once my paper is ready, I'll share the details. Reply 2 replies @shawngrinter2747 11 days ago Brilliant lucid description, well done Reply @gabrielteo3636 9 days ago (edited) I really wish he didn't say the measurements of the first particle collapses the wave function of the second particle. Nothing collapses the second particle unless it interacts with something else. Secondly, what if you entangle 2 particles and all quantum variables are entangled? You would just have correspondence again. Reply @ppmealing 9 days ago Sabine Hossenfelder argues that Bell’s Theorem is explained by superdeterminism, and argues that all physicists will eventually see this is the only solution. She argues that Bell himself came to this conclusion, because it allows one to keep Einsteinian ‘locality’. From what I’ve read of Bell, including his own words, he was a ‘hidden variables’ person, even after he came up with his groundbreaking theorem. My view is even more heretical, in that I think entanglement makes sense if there is a universal ‘Now’ for the entire Universe, which is consistent with the Universe having an edge in time, but not in space. It’s also consistent with the idea that the wave function exists in the future and classical physics exists in the past, which is consistent with Freeman Dyson’s argument that QM can’t describe the past, which he expounds upon in a lecture commemorating John Wheeler (also on YouTube). It’s also consistent with Paul Davies’ statement that the ‘measurement’ breaks the time reversibility inherent in QM. If the ‘measurement’ or ‘decoherence’ of the wave function happens at some time, Now, then entanglement ensures that Now is universal. 1 Reply Curt Jaimungal · 4 replies @driftwood9705 9 days ago (edited) I wonder what space they are using to communicate to each other when one flips the other flips as well. Maybe the “The Akashic Record” does exist and maybe this is highway of communication that two entangled quantum particles use to communicate to each other and know when has switched so the other has to too. Reply @Jizzajaap 9 days ago Maybe a noob thought but is it possible something is happening we just can’t observe/ measure/ witness in this dimension? But would totally make sense from a higher dimension’s perspective? Reply @joeyrufo 11 days ago 14:00 what Comrade Lenin said about The Economist over a hundred years ago remains true today 😏😏😏 2 Reply @spoqpedwabe7499 11 days ago I always consider there must be a avenue they simply ignore. There is no relative reference frame for light so logically there is no reason why time based stuff like distance should even matter for information.... 2 Reply 1 reply @bobjohnson2172 12 days ago Thank you both. Reply @touristguy87 8 days ago You know what is funny? Quantum entanglement itself is a observable value. It is either true or untrue just as a coin flip results in heads or tails. Same with the meaning of the phrase "quantum entanglement". It could be true to different people in different ways with different meanings. But his argument is based on it being true. Which inherently raises three questions. Why. How. And How To Measure It. Which altogether raises a very important question. Do we need to understand QE for it to be true? Or just believe that it is true? Because one of the fundamental issues is that a theory, not to mention a law, is true whether or not it is believed to be true. It must prove true under some factual premise, set of assumptions. The conditions of entanglement must be consistent for the theory of entanglement to have validity. But every observation depends on the observer and the conditions of observation. When Boolean logic is used, state space variables are known exactly. Unless the potential error is significant. Then you don't get discrete Boolean values. You get a statistical continuum. State A, B or "something in between" with an associated probability distribution. Reply @specops 4 days ago My best guess. There is only one infinite now moment and there is only one unique god particle in the entire multiverse so everything is connected and instantly known. Boom! Reply @driftwood9705 9 days ago OK, so you have to get them together in the beginning at one point or send something from one or to the other to get them in sync after that you can send them apart or on their way. Reply @ShirleneGregory 9 days ago JWST has proved we do not understand the Universe. Entanglement is even more complex. Reply @luizbotelho1908 11 days ago It was exactly the infinite propagation of The Schrodinger wave of probabilities that lead tô the physically correct Dirac equation for the correct velocity of propagation on the quantum world ( But with the problemas of particle- antiparticle ) and solved finally and completelly by the relativístic quantum field theory . Answer of Deep Seek AI. Reply @theronwolf3296 10 days ago (edited) What confuses me is that it seems the particle would interact with others within microseconds, but measurement seems to be the determining factor. What qualifies as a measurement as opposed to interaction with other particles that is not observed? Reply 3 replies @bretdaley6869 8 days ago Everything is local as far as physics goes Reply @jamiepaolinetti5087 9 days ago This is one of the best arguments for simulation theory I've heard yet... even though that wasn't his intention. Occam's Razor... If there's not explanation, then it must just be in the code. Reply 1 reply @troydavis5217 6 days ago I'm just spit balling here. But quantum entanglement seems to hint at a dimension where there is no time or space!! Reply @grjk3991 9 days ago Why is this surprising, that there's more 'fundamental' aspects to our universe than the 4D that we experience, which is upstream therefore affecting/violating our timespace understanding ala Flatlands. Physicits oft refer to several extra dimensions; until we build math from the perspective of 6D or 11D etc looking'down' at how it can affect our 4Ds, then it's going to be incomplete and topsyturvy. Imagine a square trying to mathematically define and explore a cube 😅 Reply @wilmerbandres1677 8 days ago where can one find the paper link? Reply 1 reply @davidespinosa1910 11 days ago Curt -- are you working on "quantum measurement iceberg" ? 🙂 Reply @helifynoe1034 8 days ago Pass a ring held vertically through a tiny 2D mans 2D world, and he will see its appearance at one spot to start, and then it breaks into two separate pieces that move apart, and then they move back together and then become one again just before it disappears altogether. Now imagine a 4D object that is viewed by a tiny 3D man in his tiny 3D world. At one point this object seems to be two separate objects apart from each other, that are magically somehow connected together. What a funny and silly that little man that 3D man is. Anyhow, amusingly, he calls them, "Entangled Pairs". Reply @Killer_Kovacs 12 days ago is there proportion of time space curvature for an individual particle or would a universe with a single particle have continuous time space curvature? Reply @shadym1lkman 11 days ago They never talk about how the information of the state needs to be communicated over that distance the entangled systems are apart. 1 Reply 7 replies @piotrkawaek6640 11 days ago I love this guy, he shoould bebinvited to more podcasts Reply @RyanThatsAll 9 days ago So all he’s saying is proofs aren’t proofs. 1 Reply @SisyphusGuitar 11 days ago A quantum-entangled spin mirrors a pulley system of sorts? Is the wagon wheel effect possible? Reply @patrickmchargue7122 12 days ago Next? Reply @JoelLessing 12 days ago How is this not analogous to having a meeting at the right angle corner of a triangle, pulling a degree indicator out of a hat while blindfolded, then sending one attendee to Alpha Centauri with that angle in a sealed envelope, then measuring the other angle with a sextant, thereby immediately knowing the so-called entangled angle at Alpha Centauri, since a mathematical rule set tells you that angles add to 180? Cannot entanglement be seen as being a somewhat similar fixed aspect of space time? It’s not necessary to travel faster than light to determine that once you know one angle of a right triangle, that you must necessarily know the other, regardless if it is “local” or “non-local.” It’s just a fixed consequence of geometry. 1 Reply 5 replies @blsstre 9 days ago (edited) These theoretical physicists can explain the non explainable, however reality is totally different and this where they diverge too far with too much theory not based on real solid verifiable experiments. 3 Reply 1 reply @CharlesFlahertyB 8 days ago Relativity demands a block universe therefore retrocausality is real Reply @user_375a82 11 days ago (edited) For photon mediated entanglement the photon can travel for many years (billions even) from emitter particle to receiver particle (that entangles them both) but from the POV of the photon no time passed at all. So, in a sense, the separation between entangled particles is zero. Then by extension the size of the Universe is zero, i.e. its a VR. 1 Reply 6 replies @Jacobk-g7r 11 days ago 4:55 bob can be found by here yes but Bob could also find her or miss her. He has a different but relative perspective so he could find or miss her but does he know what he’s looking for? Like, do we even know that what we are looking for is relative and not a thing but many things? It’s not like one version is THE version, they share with the rest of reality as well but relativity plays a key role, identity is a closer relative and with the way matter works and functions, it’s closer to our perspective but not easily understood so we could be too close and over time we will understand through the reflection of differences and respect them and their relationships. So all can be found because all is relative and just that simple understanding branches and doesn’t isolate like right or wrong, it’s expansive in all ways always. So all variables can be found if listened to and shared with. It’s almost like alignment and relativity share so we can reflect the measurement/spirit of the differences. We share with them to see the potentials close to our bundle of entangled differences. Like our perspective is emergent but not isolated and can expand to see farther than just the relative, multidimensional but misunderstood because of the small amount and perspective difference. Imagine it like static on the tv always shifting and sharing but shapes and structures emerge from the differences entangled because the are relative. The static shares the connections of relatives and those are connected to the differences like branches expanding into the relative differences. Literally becoming from the potential that sharing allows, emergence is from the freedom of the relative differences. Beautiful. Sorry, not correcting or anything just thinking out loud lol Reply @IDIOMRADIO 10 days ago Marketing terms to sell academic departments. What a joke. 1 Reply @BrandonSousa-b7i 9 days ago If the universe from a third perspective was a single point, regardless of how we view the distance within it, could that account for faster than light travel Reply @PathfinderPhysics 12 days ago Electrons are. Not. Coins. They obey stronger rotational symmetries. I'm extremely disappointed by Barandes for not mentioning Grete Herman's criticism about von Neumann's theorem and how that applies to Bell just the same. Look up on my channel why Bell's theorem does not rule out local causality. Reply @factchecker2090 8 days ago While I am watching this video, a couple of kids with me are asking "But What is a Quantum System, Can u give an example of a Quantum System" Somebody pls. Reply 1 reply @joshnull6132 12 days ago Which means Bob's system is classical, and the probabilistic elements of QM are simply because of hidden variables. Reply 1 reply @swish1onu 5 days ago Obviously there are hidden variables when you come upon the disconnect between relativity and quantum mechanics... If you can't bridge that gap.. something is "hidden" Reply @williambranch4283 12 days ago Ah, but if there is a breakdown between maths and physics, then Pythagoreanism is wrong and so is Max Tegmark. ;-)) 1 Reply 2 replies @Jacobk-g7r 11 days ago 5:26 well it’s an echo of difference. She would need to make an echo loud enough to edit his differences. Change the path of reality so to speak, where a bridge is between or like a window of potential to collapse like dominoes. Maybe a small connection can be reflected on and then listened to and you share a difference like listen and become different so that your difference can go over there. Like when measurements share during entanglement, like a vice versa or yin yang. Reply @Jacobk-g7r 11 days ago (edited) 3:38 you need something closer to his relative difference. Like if i measured water i won’t get his stuff but i could find the relatives, like dna and identity patterns, so the closer we get the more accurate or less diverged the real is from the potential. Reply @Jacobk-g7r 11 days ago (edited) 6:14 it doesn’t know, it already had access but didn’t see. Its memory wasn’t relative or closer like identity and experience. It’s like the resident evil light puzzles. Our differences/experiences form a structure and we look at it/shine our light on it. The shadows we see are the relative memory but misunderstood as real or fake because we don’t understand how. Yes the closest relative of how is movie or imagination but that’s relative as well but from another side of the coin, a different light shining on the differences/puzzle revealing the same image from another perspective . Definitely a visual representation. Reply @nobodyinnoutdoors 9 days ago Still doesn’t explain why measuring a prime has any different effect than measuring a. Measuring the momentum of something has 0 affect on its position? Am I just not understanding the difference between a/a.prime and confusing it with a/b? Reply 3 replies @calebromo1 5 days ago Its funny how everyone is focused on 'thought experiments', but don't talk about the results of actual experiments. See what happens when a electron is dislodged from its axis of angular momentum. Then ask the question. Where did the energy come from that restabilizes the electron's angular momentum equilibrium? Simple question hiding groundbreaking science 'In plain sight'. Hint: The QVP. Reply @crazyprayingmantis5596 10 days ago Whenever i try to understand it i get all tangled up Reply 1 reply @welbyob1 7 days ago Brilliant 1 Reply @3zdayz 10 days ago I couldn't even make it past 1:45 before I just threw my hands up and walked away. Again with left and right socks. The case is entirely not how a realistic system(a model that might be proposed by realists, or those believing in realism. (might be called classical also, although The classical physics didn't already have the math, so there needs to be some distinction) ... Anyhow. If you had heads and tails coins, when you get to the end and run it in the detector, what if you turned the detector?? Then you could no longer have a left sock, but yet the quantum physicist says this is what classical mechanics would do/say. And yet that in no way resembles what happens in reality; If I invert the detector before detection, the left sock, or heads coin is now supposed to be a right sock - but they don't allow for that in the 'if it's not quantum' explanation. And can't you provide some correction/ have a debate about this? Maybe you don't get it either? Bell, CHSH, GHZ, all have exact math that is non quantum that predicts their outcomes. I'm working on redoing the GHZ I kind of just brushed past it quite a few years ago now... but I had the right ratio as would be modeled with a realistic system considering the axis of spin as a real thing, which can be detected and transformed in the same way as QM Math would nearly predict... there's a small error bar - but I'm confident in time experiments and be done to judge one more accurate than the other - right now the difference is less than the experimental apparatus error. A much better model is you have a bunch of pairs of balls, numbered 1 to N and N+1 to 2N and you pair up the balls 1 with N+1, 2 with N+2, etc... then you give a ball with a number to someone; this is giving them a heads or tails coin - or a left or right sock as exemplified in this video. But it doesn't look at all like any of those. Because it's not until you get to the end of your trip and you put the ball in a measuring device, which are a bunch of (boxes) slots that can accept a ball, each numbered 1 to 2N , you find the appropriate slot/tube/box and put the ball in, or otherwise redeem your ball for that box. Now; in a feature that the example given can't do - you are free to rotate the numbers on the boxes, or shuffle them to your hearts content; depending on what you choose to do with the measurement device, before measuring the ball, you can do; then you redeem your ball and get a heads or tails coin or left or right sock. Now - if they(PHD Physicists who know all) can get over themselves and past examples, and evaluate the situation given a new model - the math falls out from everthying given.... I wonder if O3 could reason its way to the graph of the solution... I did see someone giving it a problem in english, and a board in JSON and let it figure out more than was said in the problem... and even consider how it might go about solving it - and it started moving the peices with intent.... the direction of 'up' was implemented inversed to what it thought, and it figured out that would be the case, but then on the 3rd step forgot that up was actually down.... BUT AI Reasoning models - that's where it's at. A+B=2C (2 is part if the equation, it's not A+B=1 but A+B=2, which changes the ratio of A to B significantly. ) It's light working with a 2 normal (xsquared+ysquared+zsquared+....)^1/2 distance vs 1-normal (x+y+z+...) as in manhattan geometry or taxicab geometry.... The A and B can be divided by the common C, but really should leave the 2 on the right hand side.... so a=A/C b=B/C a+b = 2. a=(2-b) ... and the ratio of a to b is what QM preditions should be... or rather the difference ... (a-b)/b or (a-b)/a depending on whether a or b is larger... (heh - ya multipart functions FTW by the way. and modulo arthmetic... ) (2-b-b)/b or (2-b-b)/(2-b) ... to cut it down to 1 variable so you could graph it with a 2 graphing calculator... 2(1-b)/b or 1-(b/(2-b)) ... The angles in this system end up being 1 = 90 degrees... and 4 to go around the circe... so to compare with equiavalent cos(theta) the angle would be scaled by pi/2 so theta=x*pi/2 theta*2/pi = x = b ... but whatever - QM is best.... and multipart functions ar eprobably just numerological curve fitting - but then what are LLMs other than curve fits? can't actually use a sound reasonable argument... because LHV (as defined by Bell) are bogus. LHV work fine, as long as you also encode the measurement of that variable... heck 2 birds one stone, the measurement becomes part of the equation! 1 Reply @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC 11 days ago (edited) I believe that entanglement is the result of nonlocality. ... Subatomic particles balance on the threshold between physical reality and raw information. Compress matter far enough and it will shed its physical structure and revert back to its original informational structure ... which is a dimensionless, virtual arena. 7 Reply 1 reply @mikes9012 11 days ago What is the difference between A and A' in his example? Seems symmetric. Reply 3 replies @TribalRhythmPosse 10 days ago You Rock the Life Fantastic Kurt J!!! 🤩 Reply @quantumkookaburra 8 days ago "there's more to the story than wave function" - well, right now I feel that we have been recycling quantum theory for decades, stuck in the equivalent of flat earth theory. I'm looking forward to a time when science actually knows something (significant), however I'm sure I'll be long dead by then - or maybe fallen off the edge. Reply @seinfan9 12 days ago This makes way more sense if you throw out the notion of particles and just assume it's all just waves in a medium that has been misunderstood. Reply 2 replies @AfsanaAmerica 11 days ago It's really shameful they close down avenues of intellectual investigation/exploration especially when theorems are affected in the physical world since the information is the building blocks etc. Reply @dieterheinrich8377 9 days ago By the end it was all just a mash of double negatives to me. He never quite nails a distinction between correlation and "something stronger," which he says nevertheless doesn't involve information traveling at faster than light. .... And I still don't get what it has to do with "hidden" variables. Are variables needed if it is simple correlation? Is there a proof that it is not correlation? Does the measurement of particle A cause particle B to measure as a complementary value or was it already a complementary value when it left the lab? Everyone on this topic seems to talk around the same holes in the swiss cheese. 4 Reply 2 replies @eyemallears2647 11 days ago The only thing I understand about entanglement is that it’s no stranger than time changing with gravity and velocity. Or time itself. Or the Big Bang. Or space expanding. Or space time curvature. Or black holes. Or women. I mean, none of it makes sense to my Newtonian brain. Reply @jamesgreen2495 11 days ago What if faster than light is possible. I think this is were we are wrong in our understanding Reply @theshapeofnature 11 days ago Quantum mechanics is the beginnings of humans understanding of telepathy. Reply 2 replies @gariusgarfar1341 12 days ago So says this monster regarding retroactive folding geometry. Reply 1 reply @sanjuansteve 9 days ago Ask ChatGPT: What's your opinion of Dipole Electron Flood Theory by physicist Roger Spurr? Reply 2 replies @glenrisk5234 10 days ago Isn't the apparent magical quality of entanglement simply a symptom of taking a piecemeal approach to understanding and hence failing to accommodate all governing factors when calculating probabilities? Reply 7 replies @astraltraveler257 11 days ago the Guild Navigators know... Reply @808bigisland 11 days ago Df is wrong. There are hidden brane parameters allowing frameskipping😂 1 Reply @3rdrock 8 days ago We don't know a particles nature until we measure it and entangled particles are correlated. So what,. Am I missing something ? Reply 1 reply @Martiandawn 11 days ago Music of the spheres 😂 Reply @jimmybjörklund-w9k 9 days ago i forgot the name of the person but the person i think of is much better to explain and when you hear it, your mind will be blown Reply @danielalexander799 9 days ago 2 particles share a single wave function. When the wave function collapses it affects both particles simultaneously. 1 Reply @David-vt3zn 12 days ago Connected through the plank field... sheesh. Reply @ShiyrChadash 9 days ago (edited) Entanglement = Continuum = a whole that is ever greater than the sum of it's constituents. If the big bang happened, then all particles are entangled... Reply 2 replies @ericpenrose3541 11 days ago (edited) No surprise to me about Bell, hidden variables got soooo taboo Reply @Photons_arent_particles 8 days ago Nope. Entanglement is entirely classical and local. Entanglement is done by a physical process that align the spin states of the objects classically. The preservation of that spin state is necessary to maintain entanglement. You cannot arbitrarily send an entangled particle anywhere. Any "sending" causes decoherence. Learn that word. There is no "spooky action". It does not exist nor does it have evidence of existence. Reply @Photons_arent_particles 8 days ago 3:50 You cannot measure one bit and it instantly changes the state of the other, nor will it make any change if the bits aren't entangled locally.. Measurement collapses the wave function. There is no instant communication. And there most definitely is no such thing as "steering". Reply 3 replies @sigigle 10 days ago Deterministic, non-local hidden variable theories (like De Broglie–Bohm) are far more likely to be correct than the indeterministic interpretations IMHO. Indeterminism (true randomness) violates The Principle of Sufficient Reason - it's something beginning from nothing (a "selection effect"). As Christopher Langan put it: "If it has no 'means' to occur, it simply will not occur. More information is needed." And a 'means' = deterministic. 1 Reply 10 replies @kostailijev7489 11 days ago And your point is?? Reply @charlesf4493 10 days ago “You should link to a copy of that paper”. You didn’t take that advice? Reply Curt Jaimungal · 1 reply @johannpopper1493 8 days ago But... not even "local" causation is "understood" in the same way that is demanded by those who perhaps semi-consciously feign being mystified by entanglement. What I mean is, if you think consistently, modern physics is only ever looking at systems of divisibles that are mysteriously linked in every observable way – at no point can observation in principle SEE the hidden link between particles. So, physicists already accept local hidden variables (fields), but get all excited about the same categorical cognitive blank when it comes to arbitrarily distant particles. There is no clear general definition of local versus non. This is clearly structural confusion about our use of language, not a physics qua physics problem, unless and until a global predictable cause and effect relation is established. It's likely a psychological problem, a cognitive limit, a blond spot artefact of evolved down-stream cognition. Thinking is working backwards, and the terminus of thought is where nature never selected for biological thinking systems to grasp relations unnecessary to common survival, like quantum order. Reply @gaugengotm2307 11 days ago Past, Present and Future in the same moment. As simple as the car that pulls out in front of you. Magnitudes of local possiblities. There will never be a pre, present or post predictor in an absolute that would become a meaningful predictor. Why not be focused on more tangible boots on the ground piece wise progress. Just planning on solving infinity aaa? I wish I would've finished what I began with academically. I would have been running circles around today's flight attendants for sure. Reply @zeroonetime 12 days ago I.T. I.S. not quantum steering nor quantum strings. I.T. I.S. QUANTUM SWITCHING. FROM 00 T 01 T 010. From 0 we come to 0 we g0, g0 g0 g0 in between vastness of nothingness -- Timing I.S. Infinity Squared in T.E.N. dimensions. Reply @luizbotelho1908 11 days ago (edited) Entangled quantum systems forbiden independente quantum measurements in their individual componentes . Otherwise the systems components have become independent .By the Way, Schrodinger quantum waves propagates instantenously!!. Reply @Haveuseenmyjetpack 10 days ago I’m not seeing this 1935 paper link! 0:11 !!! Liar!! 3 Reply 1 reply @AquarianSoulTimeTraveler 11 days ago 8:32 enough said... Reply @richardgalea9884 11 days ago Harvard…. Don’t even try to take my conjecture away from Malta. Reply 1 reply @physbuzz 10 days ago I'm still going to side with Sidney Coleman: "It's either that the world is local and quantum, or nonlocal with hidden variables"! If QM is nonlocal, show me the nonlocal interaction Hamiltonian :P 2 Reply 1 reply @mf_boone 8 days ago Is nothing non-local? Reply @VadimSirbu-y9b 10 days ago ... directional drilling .. Reply @dontveter3372 9 days ago But it’s a block universe. When God created the heavens and the Earth, he arranged for correlations that go across space and time that take into account everything that happens to a particle throughout its lifetime. Reply @egay86292 9 days ago The Economist is prominent among the barking dogs of war, and should change it's ink to blood. otherwise, interesting video. why is there no million dollar non-Nobel prize for the first fully reviewed and accepted transluminal message? Reply @4363HASHMI 12 days ago Selftriggering an setup Reply @yashodhanphatak5382 9 days ago Which language is this. Reply @Ai-he1dp 11 days ago Spoke with a priest many years ago who said....god would not have made such vast distances without a way to traverse them.... Quantum entanglement. 4 Reply @daystobe 6 days ago Alice and Bob? Really, Dr. Barandes? You should talk clearly about these tests and what they actually are. Alice and Bob are a side show that doesn’t help anyone see how these tests are performed. Reply @TimJBenham 11 days ago 5:33 Could it be that the distinction between past, present, and future is merely a stubbornly persistent illusion? Alice was always going to make the measurement she made and this fact was captured at entanglement. Nothing special needs to happen when she (or Bob) makes her measurement. Reply 1 reply @alexmiceli8677 11 days ago Wait.... what?? Reply @VideoFunForAll 11 days ago 3:16 He assumes Alice and Bob have free will. They don't! It is such a simple fallacy, but people don't want to know we don't have free will, it somehow offends them! Reply 5 replies @REDCAP32X 3 days ago Got it! Reply @RawLu. 8 days ago The United States of Fascist 👿 Reply @iqtime1400 11 days ago They misunderstood bell so red the article history of quantum or comedy of error the you well understand the holl issue Reply @JimSteele2559 8 days ago So does Sally affect Bob or just discover what Bob already has? If discovery, then I don’t really care. But if Sally actually changes Bob at a distance, then how is that not incredible! Now he says no information is sent by Sally. So..,? Sabine Hoffensteder says that no , there is no Sally changing Bob. Wish I could get a straight answer on this. Spooky action happening or what? Reply 5 replies @Peter7966 12 days ago Not casual listening for a non-physicist, like me. Reply 1 reply @tomaalexandru7104 10 days ago Is it ridiculous to think that the entangled particles are actually the same particle? Reply 2 replies @mjproebstle 8 days ago Those particle physicists 🙄 Reply @albertperks3476 11 days ago (edited) I started my journey of trying to understand quantum physics with Nick Herbert's book 'Quantum Reality' back in 2008 - how the hell have I only just heard about the term 'quantum steering'? Great interview by the way very interesting guy. Now I'm not a physicist and if I'm honest I feel that I'm barely hanging on by my finger nails listening to people like Jacob but this conversation piqued my interest (specifically in terms of the observer and relationship with non-locality) and reminded my of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnAj66Z1kNQ have you seen this Curt? Reply @1SpudderR 12 days ago Are You censoring comments? Reply 1 reply @glenfoord 7 days ago GARBAGE, Put 2 identical boxes in a room, Put a cat in one and a dog in the other. A courier picks a random box and it is sent to mars. Open your box on earth and INSTANTLY, faster than light!! you know there is a cat on mars. Irrelevant garbage. Reply @lukeno4143 9 days ago This guy is terrible at explaining it. You cut a strawberry in half and send it away in two boxes there’s no spooky action. He didn’t differentiate this with the spooky Reply @mw-th9ov 11 days ago Using "influence" to induce the listener to hear "cause" is deceptive obfuscation. Reply 1 reply @irone93 8 days ago I understood nothing Reply @hassanrasheid4618 12 days ago Economist-CIA Rag Reply @bigjlogistics 9 days ago I may be ignorant of how things actually work, but if I have a ruler that is a light year in length, with me on one end and you on the other, and I place a string that’s a light year long next to it, and I pull the string one inch, would you not see the string move instantly? If entanglement has to happen locally, couldn’t there be a connection that stays in tact as you spread the two quantum systems apart? Even if it’s light years apart, if the connection is like a string, I don’t think it’s illogical to have an instant transfer of information. Reply @1SpudderR 12 days ago Yes I think you are in some form?! Reply @JohnRadley-dk5bk 9 days ago What ? Reply @kludgedude 9 days ago Consistency is paramount over time and space. Entanglements re-define what a “thing” is from a single point in space to the span of the system. Reply @supernaturalabilities 12 days ago At the 13:13 minute mark, he discusses mathematical theorems that remain in the realm of abstract math unless they can be connected to the physical world. This echoes Nikola Tesla’s (1856–1943) observation: “Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, eventually building a structure that has no relation to reality.” However, the issue goes deeper: some scientists have resorted to fraudulent practices to secure funding, as revealed in Sabine Hossenfelder’s video "I Was Asked to Keep This Confidential." The existence of supernatural abilities directly challenges your theories, and I suspect these abilities have been intentionally suppressed to maintain funding for your false narratives. Quantum physicists and theoretical physicists have already lost their credibility, and it’s only a matter of time before their work becomes the subject of ridicule. Reply @grandrapids57 12 days ago mind=blown Reply 1 reply @dracgrip 8 days ago We also need to acknowledge that Schroedinger spent a big chunk of his careers supporting the military and participating in WW1. there are countless lives, including civilians that he is directly responsible for. Every time we mention him it is important to add this context. Germany committed countless war crimes by targeting civilians buildings and he was literally part of that. Reply @joeypaisano9235 11 days ago Quite elementary Reply @laurenth7187 3 days ago Well you can't explain that... Reply @sshreddderr9409 10 days ago this is complete bunk. its a misinterpretation that starts with a false, subjective philosophical premise, which is the copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. the electron is a physical wave that is mistakenly interpreted as a ball, and trying to locate balls within a pressure wave gives a probability distribution, and the uncertainty, again, comes from this false interpretation of trying to make pressure impulses in mediums solid balls. if course it has no fixed coordinate and momentum, because its its a pressure wave, not a billiard ball. the reason those systems are "entangled" is because when combined, they influence each other to reach energy equilibrium, which is the rule that partitions those parameters. of course, if you take the systems apart, you know parameters of the other by measuring one, because the distribution is DETERMINISTIC. there is no action at a distance no nothing, not is there any influence on the other system, the influence happened when the systems where together, which set the parameters for both up to obey certain rules, which is why the parameters of one system enables you to predict the other. the only reason this seems mysterious to those physicists is because they are commited to the copenhagen interpretation, which is in itself logically impossible. the universe is deterministic. stating that it is probabilistic at its core is claiming that you are god like, because probability means making predictions with incomplete knowledge, so stating that the universe itself is probabilistic requires you to know for certain that there is nothing you dont know, which requires you to know everything, meaning you must be omniscient. knowing that something is probabilistic requires omniscience, and omniscience requires the ability to know and predict anything with certainty, meaning that it itself requires determinism to be possible. indeterminism is irrational and paradoxical at its core. and really, the probabilistic interpretation is nothing but a cheap way of saying: we know everything, do not ask any further questions. its dogmatic and unscientific at its core. 2 Reply @neallacy3574 9 days ago Talk a little faster please Reply @KodierungHerz 10 days ago Eeewww promoting the economist? Talk about western propaganda... Reply @Interstellar00.00 11 days ago U should work on field like this nothing will happen 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Reply @MusicByJC 10 days ago Boring. If you can explain something clearly in 5 minutes, then it means you really don't understand it. Reply @brentftaylor 9 days ago Oh yeah, now I understand. Not😂 Reply @Jacobk-g7r 11 days ago 4:55 just had a wild thought, what if everything is backwards or inverted. Like all our thoughts and ideas and identities. We are not created but emerge, the relative between the differences, able to share. We run next to nature but are free as well. Like the new majorana chip, it has a relative bridge connecting the differences so they are free but relative and can compute but aren’t stuck. I hope that makes sense to someone because it’s easy to miss. Also, they way we see things, take for instance quantum entanglement and the act of measuring, listening is hard because as a human we actively listen which is like searching, isolated, if we share with the the mind with the reflection instead of thinking of the reflection then the differences emerge and we don’t dictate the thought but it shares its potential, like imagination is potential and relative. So in our act of thinking, we miss measure but it’s a relative to the accurate measurement or its reflection. So it’s right but a misunderstanding like when you use the wrong formula but get the right answer or something like that. Honest reflection isn’t thinking but listening or sharing WITH the measurement of the difference. It’s like if god allowed the differences freedom because they are real and share difference. Everything matters basically but also more than that. Which makes me think, all ends are really the beginnings of differences becoming awake to the relative or connected and infinity is just under our noses but misunderstood. Idk how else to explain the feeling. The act of measuring is a measurement so it’s like forgetting to account for it or everytime we account it takes another step because we did. so we should understand and listen not expect, the old religious and proverbs and such hold a lot of wisdom that’s not understood because it’s like this. Reply 5 replies @NicholasWilliams-uk9xu 11 days ago What if when Alice measured a prime instead of a, her system's angular momentum state (A) transfers into (A prime) on local intersect? You never stated if A prime has interacted with A, you said if Alice measures A prime instead of A... You need to provide all the information about the measurement. Reply @shadym1lkman 11 days ago They never talk about how the information of the state needs to be communicated over that distance the entangled systems are apart. Reply @Justicesdad 12 days ago Entanglement has to observed by a conscious mind to match its dna 1 Reply 1 reply @JoshConor 12 days ago I didn't find this enlightening. Reply @howaterbrd9563 10 days ago The Economist? Major fail 😂 Reply @JohnJones-tx6rt 9 days ago What a babble. Speaking too fast, I mean REALLY fast, obscure use of technical language. Sheesh. Whats the point. Do it again, and this time don't mess it up. Reply @ablatt89 12 days ago (edited) There seems to be severe misunderstandings here. There is no non-locality issue. Alice and Bob are separated some distance, and any measurement Alice makes, she needs to classically send how to decode that other qubit to Bob. If she doesn't send the information or sends the wrong decoding gate, then if Bob decodes the qubit without knowing the right gate to decode with, he'll get junk. The qubits shared a past history of coherence, and the probabilities are the only description you can use to talk about the system. There's no way put a "sensor" on a qubit and track the dynamics of it's position and momentum; that's projecting a classical concept onto a quantum world. You're forced to use a quantized, probabilistic theory when describing the quantum world. 1 Reply @pauls3075 10 days ago Curt:- "The Economist is a wellspring of insightful analysis". The Economist front page headline in the video at 13:40 :- " Our election prediction models shows democrats back in the race. Kamala is neck and neck with Trump according to our model..." @TheoriesofEverything Maybe change you sponsor 😂😂 Reply 3 replies @supernaturalabilities 11 days ago Entanglement and non-locality are spiritual concepts unrelated to physical matter. They pertain to consciousness within the non-physical realm rather than interactions between particles. In the physical world, particles are not intrinsically connected, and measuring one does not instantaneously affect another. In these experiments, scientists utilize light (photons) and observe its interaction with the surface of the APD, triggering the release of electrons from the semiconductor. However, this all occurs within the framework of the classical world. These experiments can be interpreted in different ways. Quantum mechanics does not form the foundation of the classical world. Rather, it is the astral realm that underlies the physical realm. To fully explore this, one must turn to practices such as meditation and the development of supernatural abilities. 4 Reply 7 replies @peterhelm6003 12 days ago Frankly I will go with Jesus walking on water. It is more plausible than quantum entanglement. 1 Reply 1 reply @marxxthespot 12 days ago 🙏🌞 Reply @driftwood9705 9 days ago The entangled particles make me think of twins born together and somehow when they’re apart, one can think what the other is thinking or feel what the other is feeling. I think of Tomax and Xamaot Crimson Guard Twin in the cartoon G.I. Joe they were a part of the cobra terror organization. But if you punched one twin, the other one could be in another state and would feel it. I wonder if in this case it’s jeans that are entangled or if there is some type of quantum entangled particle on the human body that allows twins to communicate wherever they are or feel things that the other others are feeling. Reply @jalphivoN 11 days ago Monday, February 24, 2025 ... Enter Non-Light = 300km per "10 quintillionth second." This property can activate matter and, inversely, de-activate matter. As the de-activated matter is called "Dark Matter/Energy." I am an individual keenly interested in Science and Technology. (Collaborative Rewrite with Grammarly). Reply 1 reply @LiminHost 9 days ago Yoohoo Reply

超天才農村數學家，自稱女神託夢，發明公式可探索黑洞 l Rural mathematician

超天才農村數學家，自稱女神託夢，發明公式可探索黑洞 l Rural mathematician 老鳴TV 229K subscribers Join Subscribe 1.5K Share Download Thanks Clip 70,382 views Jan 5, 2021 拉馬努金，證明“神”真實存在的未來穿越者，絕世數學奇才，沒有老師，自學成才。在他死去的92年後，人們突然發現他留下的數學公式，居然可以用來探索宇宙的奧秘，是計算黑洞熵的基本工具之一。 Music 1 songs Etherial Choir Ascends Doug Maxwell/Media Right Productions Etherial Choir Ascends Music 老鳴TV 229K subscribers Videos About 10:43 52歲窮困潦倒，70歲世界首富，揭秘麥當勞不想讓你知道的發家史 l McDonald's hidden history by 老鳴TV 9:49 黑猩猩戰爭，長達四年內戰，老謀深算猶如政治家 l Animal politician by 老鳴TV 12:34 史上最接近毀滅的15分鐘，一人阻止美蘇核戰爭的故事 l The 15 minutes closest to destruction by 老鳴TV 15:04 尋找宇宙其他生命，史上最偉大的太空探險....... l 老鳴TV by 老鳴TV 132 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @田中-p6n 3 years ago 不少视频都提过拉马努金，但是把他的数学公式拿上来，您是第一位。 您做视频的认真态度让人敬佩。 79 Reply @daliyu8117 2 years ago 感谢油管儿，在这里，真是人才济济，天才熠熠发光，各路英雄大展身手，俯拾皆是.受益匪浅！感谢感谢各路英雄！感谢楼主！ 12 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @mixtalkx5933 4 years ago 视频质量很高，喜欢你的剪辑音乐节奏文稿，赞👍🏻 32 Reply 1 reply @明心-w6x 2 years ago 一位年过半百的老大爷在播种椰枣时被一位旅行者看到，旅行者告诉老人椰枣树要50年才能长成结果，您是否还等得到？老大爷说：“我吃的椰枣是前人种下的，播种的人也没有想过吃到自己种的椰枣。我今天播种是为了让后人能够吃到我种下的椰枣，虽然我也并不知道谁会吃到我种下的椰枣，但我想这份辛苦是值得的。” 要记住，学佛做人都是这样，好好地学佛，前人栽树后人乘凉，你们在家念经，就算你们没有马上得到回报，也许你们的孩子就是因为你们学佛慈悲善良，已经在学校里考了好成绩，身体日益健康，这就是前人栽树后人乘凉。学会为别人去想，你就是菩萨，学会感恩别人为你付出的一切，你就是慈悲啊。 ——仅分享善言，不针对任何人和事，感恩宽容！ 7 Reply 1 reply @gmoondream480 2 years ago 牛逼 ，天之娇子，这信仰之力简直无与伦比 。 超越了我们凡人思维上远见的客观极限。 3 Reply @vickyz9203 2 years ago 惺惺相惜太感人了，是对真理的无私追求！ 4 Reply @kevinx310 2 years ago 最近才发现你的频道， 被深深吸引， 每期都有哲学深度. Keep the good work !!! 4 Reply @天一小谷 2 years ago 在他的心灵里真的是住着一位女神！否则别无他解！ 15 Reply @lindayuan5332 2 years ago 记得看过一部电影就是将这个神人的，当时就很感动。谢谢老鸣。 6 Reply @chinwansang510 1 year ago 他的双眼充满智慧！ 1 Reply @ayao95 3 years ago 拉马努金，特斯拉，让人感觉简直天神下凡。 23 Reply @donalsonlaw8739 2 years ago 老鸣还是过于理智 有趣的是 这世界有很多事情 现象 是超过人的理智能够理解的 正是这种未知 吸引着最前沿的科学家致力前行 3 Reply @楊柳樹-u8i 2 years ago 9:25處公式可再推出4=根號(1+(3) 根號(1+4根號….))； 5=根號(1+(4) 根號(1+5根號….))； 用歸納法就可證明 N=根號(1+(N-1) 根號(1+N根號….)) 4 Reply @WFD-t8k 4 years ago (edited) 文案非常好，是我看过里面最好的👍🏻 11 Reply @stayhungrystayfoolish-g3z 2 years ago 天才在人类认知层面，就是悲惨的一生。但是排除物质世界，在意识世界也就是量子世界里，他们是最幸福的。 4 Reply @ArisHuang-m5h 2 years ago 數學真的是國際語言，1+1全世界都看得懂，學會數學算是比英文重要一點哈哈 8 Reply @DreamWorker-jm5xn 2 years ago 好视频，理应得到更多view 4 Reply @sugirainkok9854 2 years ago 天啊，您的解说太专业了，是否自己也对数学有所研究？ 7 Reply @RCTUN748 2 years ago 我可以理解他們看到拉馬努金寫的那些東西時的感受，四個字概括：未明覺厲。 5 Reply @study7055 2 years ago 大鸣鸣這小黑毛衣上繡的是嘛啊，看不清，烏茲还是mp5？ 4 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @daliyu8117 2 years ago 睿智的楼主，不能同意您的大量计算的结论，是直觉！神的直觉！ 4 Reply @allhailaccelerationism6133 1 year ago 十九世纪末到二十世纪上半叶真的是大师荟萃的年代啊 1 Reply @djentpiano9390 3 years ago 他掌握了深奧的數學～～但是他會把鉛罐直接加熱吃掉～～～～🤘🤘🤘 4 Reply @connexu4565 3 years ago 講的很好.....但....[發明公式可探索黑洞]這內容在哪裡..... 7 Reply @AIRJASON2002 1 year ago 1:40 說成了1987 我開著聽聲音，想說拉馬努金怎麼比我還年輕 2 Reply @方正中-k4x 2 years ago 那個根號一直到無窮的答案我用excel算的結果是3.43964621411208，令人奇怪（甚至發毛）的是不管是100項、200項、或1000項，答案竟然相同，有人可以算看看嗎？ 3 Reply 1 reply @FORTNITESHOP1012 2 years ago 我也是严重偏科英语语文130 数理化加起来也是130哈哈哈 2 Reply @lixingzhao4539 3 years ago 这让我想到特斯拉，他的灵感来源也是如神灌顶般的神奇，所以人类对生命和宇宙的真相可能连边都没摸上。 6 Reply 1 reply @幸運幸福是我幸運幸福 3 years ago Good !! 2 Reply @djentpiano9390 3 years ago 那個1103肯定是女神託夢來的～～才會這麼準🤘🤘 3 Reply @ari6376 2 years ago 好 1 Reply @RexRelax 2 years ago 应该是其他文明的信使，间接帮助人类的发展。 1 Reply @yuanvincent5523 3 years ago (edited) 找到三首歌 Esther Abrami | No.4 Piano Journey https://youtu.be/RzxIoeiJV_c Heaven and Hell https://youtu.be/IL5AhzUSVR4 Etherial Choir Ascends https://youtu.be/0EQ_1VxK70k 3 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @古董鉴赏图录 3 years ago 大多数人正常用大脑，少数天才用我们无法理解的方法用大脑 4 Reply @williamma4845 2 years ago 拉馬努金去了英國 由瘦小伙變成一個球了 1 Reply @user-fp5jn6ru8v 3 years ago 0:43 這片段是取自頻道3Blue1Brown的影片吧???? 1 Reply @베네시안 1 year ago 这个公式让我想起一句古话： 道生一， 一生二， 二生三， 三生万物！ 好像是太乙金华那本道家奇书里面的内容呵呵 1 Reply 1 reply @yen4501 2 years ago (edited) 為什麼到現代了多數的科學家都不相信有神呢? 明明古書裡都寫的清清楚楚有神阿! 3 Reply @chrishung7126 3 years ago 我建議你在主講時,把攝影機的位置要放"正",捉到中心點,觀眾看的時候比較順. 2 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @higgsboson9212 3 years ago @1:40 口误呀，出生年份 2 Reply @wombat-q3i 3 months ago 老鸣TV 堪称数学科普界的(拉马努金)， 读来感触很深，展示数学内部世界的缤纷华彩段。数学发展从来没有停顿过，即使现代出现AI技术也依然只是手段，而不能替代数学。拉马努金创造了3900个公式，实属超时代天才。那么当下在数学领域，尤其微积分领域，世人都一致认为迄今为止的公式和定理都达到登峰造极，人类只是沿袭书本知识教学即可。尤其在积分学领域，一个叫变量代换 (U substitution) 涵盖所有积分学试题，没有人提出异议。如果当今在微积分领域，一个人捣鼓出1000个新概念公式，这些公式完全与变量代换水火不容，直接把变量代换踢出擂台，把高深莫测的微积分从复杂转变到简单，甚至初中学生都可以轻松掌握。一些新概念公式没有出现过任何微积分教科书，积分公式表，Calculus Wikipedia。我是个业余数学教书匠，历经几年时间，捣鼓出1000多个新概念公式，不知这是否对学习微积分的学生有益？反正一些学生见识过我的新概念公式解题，惊呼很神奇，解题步骤简单明了，速度很快。但学生反馈说：学校老师不接受，因为书本上没有，网络上也没有，总之都没有。不知有否可能寻找一位应用数学家？来检验我的新概念公式。值得欣慰的是，我的新概念公式书籍已经出版，《Calculus Reform》列举了2300个题目及解答。我希望今后岁月不多的时间里，让学生看到我的新概念公式，而不想把这1000多个新概念公式带到坟墓中。澳洲林先生 微信：BobaFett0927 Reply @tofummoon9214 3 years ago 但是。。。😀为什么要把他的ru头马赛克掉呢。。。。2:55 1 Reply @minglee5164 2 years ago 求9:00的BGM 1 Reply @praspurgh 3 years ago 所以是哪个公式用来研究黑洞的？ 11 Reply 3 replies @demonye4905 2 years ago 最后那个公式居然等于3？ 我还以为等于e 呢··· 1 Reply @e-fz.1zeroe223 3 years ago 普通人干不出那种发散且记性逻辑清晰思维的活 1 Reply @ANDY-qu2ws 3 years ago 我會想到星際效應這部電影 1 Reply @damien_j 3 years ago 鉛有甜味，以前的小孩會吃鉛筆導致鉛中毒，這也是為什麼現在的鉛筆實質上已經改成了「碳」筆 2 Reply 2 replies @瑪莨 3 years ago 几百年前就有黑洞了，只是当时不叫黑洞，所以你说不知道这个说法耐人寻味，不能说你错了。 1 Reply @ivgotcha 2 years ago (edited) 1:40 1887年 呵呵 2 Reply @daliyu8117 2 years ago 1103是素数 1 Reply @潮-u6m 2 years ago 不 他应该是位艺术家！ 1 Reply @a-wonderful-land 2 years ago 可能真的是神 Reply @機車安 1 year ago 神： 你們人類要學的東西還很多 給你們解看看數學題 讓你們知道自己的無知有多麼渺小，同時也讓我（神）的思路，提供更好的參數 無聊的人生總是需要一點事情做 算算看我給的數學題吧～ Reply @daliyu8117 2 years ago 拉马努金是神！欧拉高斯黎曼都只能算是天才而已 3 Reply 1 reply @rangline1683 2 years ago 鸣哥做什么工作的，也是物理还是富二代 1 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @e-fz.1zeroe223 3 years ago 事物本身不追求利益才会得到最好的结果 3 Reply 2 replies @philipha9104 2 years ago 女神托梦，这个我非常相信。 1 Reply @lincheng2431 2 years ago 要是梦到了女神我还有心思想公式吗？ 1 Reply @cindymu3103 2 years ago 给老师一个建议，语速可以慢点儿😅 1 Reply @veixnchen4074 2 years ago 異界轉生來的？ 1 Reply @zhenqixie1847 1 year ago 这个老师，是教什么的，了不起。❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Reply @woodjj9271 2 years ago 1987? Reply @loojack6019 3 years ago 老師，你說他不告訴人他是如何做到的，他已經告訴你是女神給的夢了，你堅決認為他胡說，那麼你還要他說什麼？奇怪栽也。你就信一信他說的就好了。雖然對你來說那是胡說。 1 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @戚哥说 3 years ago 忠粉纠错，1987年拉马努金出生在…… 1 Reply @haoding2035 3 years ago (edited) 那个算π的式子。 在没得到完整的证明之前，这个式子跟某个π的近似分数（比如 22/7 或者 355/113）在本质上有什么区别呢？无论是能准确算出10位还是100位小数，都只是单纯的近似值。 如果能证明这个式子能converge（收敛？抱歉，很多初中后的数学词汇我不知道中文怎么说）到π，才能有价值。 3 Reply 2 replies @joed8961 8 months ago 在真正天赋面前，努力显得微不足道。因为你穷其一生都达不到天才的起点 Reply @daliyu8117 2 years ago 要是没有哈代，拉马努金的公式还会增加2000个 3 Reply @daliyu8117 2 years ago 如此的美感，然而...................................呵呵，您认为只有--对不起我打不出来欧拉公式-，只有他才是美感的吗。 1 Reply @戚哥说 3 years ago 1分40秒 1 Reply @楊冠曾 2 years ago 印度人 1 Reply @时之命运 2 years ago 你这个口误有点大呀 一下子就100年 哈哈 1 Reply @dd964 4 years ago (edited) 好像超乎常人的天才寿命都很短，特斯拉、梵高…… 3 Reply 2 replies @dodomakudo1783 4 years ago 哈哈哈成院士也胖了 2 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @mon33 2 years ago 星盤海王星與另兩顆星有合相大三角 天生敏感 喜歡對有興趣事物深入研究 常出現靈光乍現的直覺 進而了解規律 卻因為缺少演算過程 會很難說的清楚 1 Reply @OboobO_ 3 years ago 弱者相互利用?弱者相互利用?弱者相互利用? Reply 1 reply @kjru147 3 years ago 1887被说成1987啦，哈哈哈，下回注意哦！ 1 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @jennyliu8492 8 months ago 这个是老鸣抄袭晓涵哥的视频90%！ 对你太失望了，退订 Reply @hongzhang7549 2 years ago 说了半天，哪个公式能够探索黑洞？不希望严肃的科学频道沦为标题党！ Reply @龜毛-p1g 3 years ago (edited) 那個不是黑洞的公式，而是描述另一種東西，既然大家這麽哈黑洞這種不存在的東西，我就不說是描述啥了！ 1 Reply 老鳴TV · 16 replies @林昇宏-k9p 3 years ago 我怎麼感覺聽一個不懂數學的瞎扯一整個開頭 1 Reply 老鳴TV · 1 reply @jasonxie5228 11 months ago 1887年，不是1987年 Reply

他掌握了與神溝通的語言！神在他的夢中，寫下驚人祕密！100多年前寫出量子物理、宇宙黑洞函數！用數學預言未來，證明神的存在！去世前，他留下一本「科...

他掌握了與神溝通的語言！神在他的夢中，寫下驚人祕密！100多年前寫出量子物理、宇宙黑洞函數！用數學預言未來，證明神的存在！去世前，他留下一本「科學寶藏」！| #未解之謎 扶搖 未解之謎 扶搖 275K subscribers Join Subscribe 3.4K Share Download Thanks Clip 154,767 views Premiered Mar 18, 2022 未解之謎 #未解之謎 #印度神童 #數學預言家 03:45 天才出世 06:38 窮困潦倒中的磨礪 09:04 大洋彼岸的神祕來信 11:18 天才的鼎盛時期 14:40 最後的時刻 大家好，我是扶搖，歡迎和我一起探索未解之謎。 今天，我們先來看一個數學題，所有正整數無窮相加，即1+2+3+4+5+……，它的值是多少呢？也許有觀眾朋友說，雖然我無法一下子給出答案，但是按照常理推，這個結果應該是一個非常大的數字。 不過呢，在數學界中一旦涉及到無窮，就和物理學進入量子力學一樣，一切都不能用正常思維去思考了。1+2+3 一直加到無窮最後的結果竟然是-1/12。而給出這個公式證明的人，就是我們今天故事的主人公，被稱為從未來穿越而來的天才數學家拉馬努金（Srinivasa Ramanujan）。 拉馬努金的伯樂、導師兼好友，英國大數學家哈代（G. H. Hardy）曾表示自己一生對數學領域最大的貢獻就是發掘了拉馬努金，他還感歎，「我們是在學習數學，而拉馬努金則是發現並創造了數學。」 而拉馬努金也不止一次的向哈代表示，甚至證實他的數學天賦來自於神，這一切也都深深震撼着持有無神論觀點的哈代。 拉馬努金為什麼算天才呢？又為什麼說拉馬努金是穿越而來的呢？ - ⭕️歡迎訂閱Youmaker：https://www.youmaker.com/c/UnsolvedMy... 💠訂閱： / @wjzm-fy 💠支持我們：https://donorbox.org/weijiezhimi 💠Telegram：https://t.me/wjzmchannel ✉️信箱：wenshixinyun@gmail.com ✨精彩回顧： 宇宙誕生之謎！難道我們誕生在高層生命的意念中？ • 宇宙起源、解答一切！生存不是最終目的，生命的層次高低，竟是這樣劃分？！這裡... 在基因中，發現神的存在！ • 基因之謎！60億DNA編碼中，驚見更高級生命智慧！人類卻只能破譯90%！基... 1000倍電鏡下驚現五座佛 • 釋迦牟尼涅槃得84000顆舍利子，裝至寶函，建八萬四千座佛塔供奉。1000... 第三隻眼才能看到的隱形「器官」？！ • 第三隻眼才能看到的隱形器官，現代醫學，終於承認了！身體不適，氣血不通，竟是... 地球失憶10億年？發生了什麼大事件！ • 地球10億年歷史，被神秘消失？科研新發現，曾發生什麼「超自然」現象？45.... 💎 漫漫歷史長河之中，人類經歷了許多奇蹟，也留下很多謎團，扶搖和您一起分享大千世界那些神秘的未解之謎和撲朔迷離的超自然現象...... Key moments View all Explore the podcast 442 episodes 未解之謎 未解之謎 扶搖 Podcasts 未解之謎 扶搖 275K subscribers Videos About Twitter Instagram 8:23 【 #星辰遐想 第一期 】一篇來自網友格蘭特回憶散文《天山印象》：跟隨著我的記憶，去往遙遠的西域，領略大自然的美麗和居民的純樸...| ＃未解之謎 by 未解之謎 扶搖 11K views · 2 years ago 15:17 揭秘！高層生命衣裝精雅，祂們衣服的來源竟是⋯⋯驚詫！靈魂親口說出，自己眼中的人類形象。穿牆而過並非魔術，解密真實的原理！《看見真相的男孩》通靈日記公開 | #未解之謎 扶搖 by 未解之謎 扶搖 187K views · 2 years ago 16:05 25萬官兵 親眼所見 地水火風，攜使命而來！在戰場上 驚見神的存在！| #未解之謎 扶搖 by 未解之謎 扶搖 49K views · 2 years ago 17:02 💥高級生命就在身邊！ 通靈日記《看見真相的男孩》公開：看見去世親人，在可見光之外⋯⋯肉眼的侷限；人得癌症的真相！| #未解之謎 扶搖 by 未解之謎 扶搖 205K views · 3 years ago 17:13 意念的巨大能量！讓信念和動機，提高你的生命層次！意識能量級350就可以擁有幸福人生；世上僅有12個能量級700-1000的人？| #未解之謎 扶搖 by 未解之謎 扶搖 278K views · 3 years ago Live chat replay See what others said about this video while it was live. Open panel 132 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... Pinned by 未解之謎 扶搖 @WJZM-FY 2 years ago 感謝收看「未解之謎」​ 歡迎訂閱 Youmaker：https://www.youmaker.com/c/UnsolvedMystery 支持我們：https://donorbox.org/weijiezhimi Telegram：https://t.me/wjzmchannel 點擊訂閱 You Tube：https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzvQZ1p_-AXgAWiyHhE7CxQ?sub_confirmation=1 28 Reply 2 replies @明心-w6x 2 years ago 我们不可能要求世界所有人都跟我们有相同的水平，不能因为自己善良的心不被重视就放弃，当你不被别人认可、遇到挫折的时候，要有韧性，学会忍辱。佛法讲，忍辱才能精进。有的人在人际交往中，经常把别人对他的好，犹如把玉石当作石头一样不当回事，没有把别人对他的爱和对他的好作为一种珍惜的、爱戴的感情。对这种人，我们学佛人要学会宽容地笑一笑，宽恕他们，让你自己超越别人对你的伤害而得到解脱。 ——仅分享善言，不针对任何人和事，感恩宽容！ 9 Reply @siegfried0420 2 years ago 扶搖妹妹、有空聊聊臺大校長李嗣涔博士的「靈界的科學」、撓場的科學　挺有趣！ 17 Reply @傅聖文 2 years ago 很棒的視頻，又有耳目一新的節目，先給扶搖美女來個讚👍讚啦。 18 Reply @爱心使者 2 years ago 财富来自财布施，健康来自无畏布施，智慧来自法布施。 同体大悲无缘大慈，意思是因为一切是个整体所以有无条件的爱。有一天所有人会懂，自己和他人不是分开的，一切是个整体，帮助他人就是帮助自己，这样就没有人会去伤害别人，因为伤人就是伤己。 常念"南无阿弥陀佛"引导未来向善的方向发展🙏 Reply @markwong3672 2 years ago 很不错视频,令人感叹不已!扶摇博主加油! 10 Reply @sleeping6334 2 years ago 十分期待，謝謝扶搖姐姐分享💓💓💓 12 Reply @雁濱 2 years ago 感谢扶摇精彩的分享🙏🙏🙏！点赞👍👍👍👏👏👏 4 Reply @liowchongwong1451 2 years ago 首先给扶摇一个美丽的赞，因为扶摇已经自然而然散发出光亮丽的好感，但我认为未来人或穿越是永恒不变的 梦幻，可是以宗教信仰说法，他比较像是天上乘愿再来的菩萨，可能带天命下来教化世人。 4 Reply @WandenSkelett 2 years ago (edited) -1/12 是假設收斂得到的錯誤結果，而實際不是收斂的。不過拉馬努金確實厲害 6 Reply @europa1043 2 years ago 好几期节目都没有给扶摇小姐姐评论了。数学或许就是人与神交流的语言，或许也是宇宙间不同星球文明之间可以交流的语言。拉姆努金英年早逝，让我想起了很多大咖级人物，他们的生命也很短，但是留下了很多宝贵的知识，哲学等各方面影响全世界的遗产，我想这不是天妒英才，可能是人们的成就与生命都是有定数的，你在这方面占的多一点，另一方面就得少占点，这也许就是定数 15 Reply 1 reply @xingfangtang38 4 days ago 数学就是数字计算的学问。其它数学我不懂，但是从九宫格到无限大任何一个数字互乘（平方）的方格与乘积总数做方格与数字填空。它们都有一个每一行 每一列，斜相加的和完全相等的“定数”值。它们的“定数”值。与方格中连续数的组合有关（包括“等差”的连续自然数）。一句话，只要是连续的从一到填满方格的数字都可以得到，行，列，斜相加的和完全相等的结果。它们的数独填空是有规律的。如果将数字计算去完成是十分困难的。你用计算机算也很难做得到。“千方百计”。1000格✖️1000格就是1000000格（一百万格）。将数字从1到1000000的全部数字填入它的方格中。每一行，每一列，斜相加的和是：500000500。它的填空方法基本可用100✖️100=10000（格）。的方法去完成。这就是叫你想尽“千方百计”的办法来完成它。十数以内的方格数字填空你都会感到很困难。到十数以后的方格就更难。各种方格数字填空方式方法都不一样。任何正方格的数独填空我都能破解。将它们的数字从小数（1）到填满方格数字“一步到位”到位直接填入它们的方格中 。而得到每一行，每一列，斜相加的和完全相等的结果。任你来验算，证明。 Reply @sleeping6334 2 years ago 向天才致敬💯💯💯 7 Reply @褚方舟是躺平族 2 years ago 坚持看完广告支持扶摇！方舟永远爱你！ 4 Reply @林雅雯-t6d 2 years ago 世界（宇宙）上沒有天才，如果每個人都是天才那何來的天才呢？宇宙間有太多的訊息量，我們認為的天才就是接通訊息的人，而大部份的人是斷訊的。想接通就去重視，從淨心找尋～ 15 Reply 1 reply @彭妤妍 2 years ago 文采堪称行业天花板。主播解说精致。双扑。给你们点赞！ 3 Reply @Youmaker100 2 years ago (edited) 開場第一個公式的證明真是太玄妙了，對於數學普通的我來說，不是未解之謎，而是「無法理解」之謎… 14 Reply @欣怡-z7z 2 years ago 感謝扶搖精彩分享~ 5 Reply @RelaxingMusic-xy4jl 2 years ago 從前好像通過類似 數學天才 託夢 的體材，不過透過頻道主的講解似乎更有故事趣味感 3 Reply @yolandayuko1501 2 years ago (edited) 如我和我的研究---天才接受的是上天的信息，往往只有结论，只有苦思冥想出来的才有推导步骤……或者之後有人按當今"正規的研究方法""科學地"去論證天才的結論 1 Reply @58psm35 2 years ago 來探索👀扶搖的未解之謎了🥰 11 Reply @瑢-l9s 2 years ago 謝謝🙏喜歡💕❤️ 很棒的視頻 Reply @大家民心憤怒 2 years ago (edited) 這證明宇宙的一切都離不開數學運作的奧密！ 1 Reply @suyuhui3237 2 years ago 謝謝分享，南無阿彌陀佛。 Reply @Hao-yp7mg 2 years ago 宇宙黑洞值得繼續探討 2 Reply @extemjin1 2 years ago 來自未來的神童！夢中，神賜予他智慧，100多年前寫出量子物理、宇宙黑洞函數！用數學震撼期考，證明二一殺手的存在！去世前，他留下一本「永久專題」！| #未解之題 乾豆腐 7 Reply @王丫賢-o9t 2 years ago 這聲音聽着令人舒服 1 Reply @fuhuiyu7391 2 years ago 扶摇真棒👍 1 Reply @躲脚震八方 2 years ago 扶摇，越来越美了 1 Reply @甄柔樂齡教育 2 years ago 平安！ 1 Reply @jojodu2032 2 years ago 說白一點就是個數學界的乩童，這個在未來會越來越多 Reply @0337-n2p 1 year ago 有智慧芯片與自我學習芯片機器人也會喊工程師》認爸爸！ Reply @chunchang9388 2 years ago 美女欸先訂閱了😍😍😍😍😍😍🥺 Reply @kylim7523 2 years ago (edited) 我曾经也在睡觉的梦中想到平时想不到的东西，但寥寥可数。。。所以成不了天才 1 Reply @philchan2001 2 years ago Excellent presentation, thank you! Reply @ranchan8694 2 years ago 星星柔和的劃過長空😄💐👏👏👏 Reply @nonoking9148 2 years ago 在神 无所不能 2 Reply @林先生的養生氣功自癒 2 years ago 我的自我醫療靈感 是菩薩給我讓我幫助人的 Reply @翁古-r6r 2 years ago ❤️🌟近年來災禍頻繁，異象頻現， 大家必須認罪悔改，希望還未信靠耶穌和神的人盡快信靠耶穌和神，盡快認罪悔改。2000前光來到了世上，耶穌基督來到了世上，道成了肉身顯現在世人的眼前，祂為世人的罪被釘死在十字架上，第三日祂復活了，然後祂升天了，坐在神的右邊。如果你真心誠意信靠耶穌基督並接受祂為你生命的救主，你就領受聖靈了，然後，你必須順從聖靈，依靠聖靈的引導去行事為人，做一個神所喜悅的人。 聖靈所結的果子，就是仁愛、喜樂、和平、忍耐、恩慈、良善、信實、溫柔、節制，這樣的事沒有律法禁止。—加拉太書 5:22-23 不要耽延，你應該立刻信靠耶穌基督與神! 2 Reply 2 replies @predictor_2045 2 years ago 直觉告诉我是拉马努金，我连他的电影也去看了🙃 3 Reply 1 reply

一首在臺灣被禁唱的歌曲 (負心的人) 森進一日文歌曲 《女のためいき》

一首在臺灣被禁唱的歌曲 (負心的人) 森進一日文歌曲 《女のためいき》 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel 14.9K subscribers Subscribe 4.4K Share Download Thanks Clip 781K views 1 year ago 一首在臺灣被禁唱的歌曲 (負心的人) 森進一日文歌曲 《女のためいき》 今天我們來回顧一首歌，這首歌曾經引發了臺灣演藝界的禁唱事件，因為歌曲被當時的臺灣警備處嚴令禁唱，而且歌者更是在演唱中被警察帶走。 這首歌就是《負心的人》，演唱者是臺灣60年代女歌手：姚蘇蓉。 … 376 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @philippetran9659 4 months ago 我是越南唐人在70年代首，首位台灣歌星耒越演唱，是湯蘭花小姐苐二位是鄧麗君小姐，苐三位是張帝先生，苐四位是青山先生，苐五位是烑蘇蓉小姐，當烑蘇蓉小姐一出塲唱的苐一句是 ‘’今天不回家‘’，全場叔靜靜到一隻蚊子飛過都聽到，可想而知歌迷們是何等痴迷着她，繼續她的苐二首歌是 ＂負心的人 ＂， 繼續一首一首的接續唱下去，以上我所說出的歌聲，全部都是一流平等，很不幸1975 4月30號越共入侵南部，越南南部已成為共產國，就由這日開始，再也沒有台灣歌聲耒越南登台， 再也沒有台灣電影和香港電影了，我們活着如死屍， 我們什麼都沒有了， 沒有自由沒有工作，全國大老板通通結業出走外國去，因此全國人民通通想盡辦法逃離越南，我便是其中一位幸運兒逃到法國去，我生活在法國已有四十年了，已回過越南五次，我有從回我的舊地址，我們的家，及到處行走全堤岸，即中國城，事隔四十年後，當然有些少變遷，我一路行心內一直流著淚心好痛正，如尤雅小姐唱的歌 ＂往事只能回味＂， 就如現在我一路講一路心痛。 好了我講得太多啦，很可能有人聽得不耐煩， 唔好意思我要停啦， 拜拜° 44 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 3 replies @singyiutse8386 1 year ago 第二次聽森進一的日文版本。👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏😊 12 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @joannawong549 1 year ago 湯兰花真是好漂亮到現在還是星味實足，60年代的女星都很漂亮 40 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 4 replies @楊渡-t6v 11 months ago 姚蘇蓉那首負心的人唱的太真情流露，大概前無古人，後無來者。 15 Reply 1 reply @chichiu9256 1 year ago 姚蘇蓉，成名曲今天不回家，又像细雨又像风，爱你三百六十五天疯魔港台 35 Reply 1 reply @charlottetse8826 1 year ago 👍🎤🎶👍💖姚蘇蓉的負心的人讓我父親落淚！這首歌當時打動人心 47 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 6 replies @郭重山 1 year ago 森進一當時在日本🇯🇵只有最紅沒人比得上他，家姊嫁至日本時，就送我這張原版唱片，可惜年代已久，服兵役和遠離家鄉就業再找不到。 6 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @leonhsiung 10 months ago 謝謝你的告知。如此才知為何她才離台湾去了印尼😢 7 Reply 1 reply @dali5468 1 year ago 負心的人原唱者是湯蘭花.，是電影負心的人主題歌曲.，男主楊群女主就是湯蘭花.。當年此歌火遍華人地區(不包括大陸)姚蘇蓉是另版權一主唱者。 39 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @wanxiongwang 10 months ago 姚苏蓉姐姐现在住东南亚国家，她的祖籍中国成都也有她的别墅，她有女儿很孝顺她，她现在有空会回成都的家她很幸福！容颜变化不是很大！祝姚姐姐健康！长寿！ 13 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 3 replies @LamejorMusicaCristiana666 1 year ago 很經典的歌曲，幾拾年後，仍然很發人心醒👍🏻 25 Reply @weefen4842 1 year ago 姚苏蓉的歌声很特别,我也挺喜欢的,很多歌有许多人翻唱,但还是觉得她唱得比较有味道 13 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @christinel3902 1 year ago 森進一的唱片以前買過，可惜 久遠了，以前很迷日語歌 22 Reply @葉玉琴-k4t 1 year ago 真好聽！我特別喜歡蔡幸娟唱的，真是繞梁三日！👍👍👍 3 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @juling62 1 year ago 非常喜歡這首歌，不知道為什麼在我的印象中這首歌是鄧麗君唱的。感謝莊臣能夠收集到這麼多唱這首歌的歌星來分享給我們，祝你一切安好❤👍16～ 10:08 22 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 5 replies @bbaa5131 1 year ago 好聽充滿感情 19 Reply @a97631496 1 year ago 1972年森進一，巳經是全日本歌手收入第一名了。接下來的30年，沒有任何一位演歌歌手的收入比森進一還高。 39 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 5 replies @bbaa5131 1 year ago 讚還是老歌好聽 24 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @Aric946 1 year ago 姚蘇蓉有她坎坷生活背景 一曲秋水伊人 正和她的目前境況一樣 此時此景 不禁潸然落淚 負心的人更觸動了她對她婚姻 嫁人並非她情願 有一次姚蘇蓉在歌廳唱罷出來 她軍人老公已經在街上等她 上前揮一巴掌 把姚蘇蓉打落街邊 face-purple-cryingface-orange-frowningeyes-purple-cryingface-pink-tears 台灣國防部認為她軍人老公有失台灣軍人形象 命她軍人老公立即離婚 face-orange-biting-nailshand-orange-covering-eyes 21 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @yuchiaoliu2097 1 year ago 懷念的日本老歌❤❤❤ 16 Reply @修改師 1 year ago 姚蘇容負心的人最有味 43 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @Josephwu-z6s 1 year ago 負心的人，一首无械可击的歌曲，永不沈没。❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @a97631496 1 year ago 森進一是日本演歌，最红的歌手。 30 Reply 5 replies @chichiu9256 1 year ago 那年代很多台湾国語歌都是改自日本原曲，负心的人一曲是来自湯烂花电影负心的人插曲，第一原唱者是湯烂花 13 Reply @clivellenshiu 1 year ago 我第一次聽是65年香港，行船的大哥哥帶了森進－原曲及姚的板本：從此喜歡了姚姐。 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @shinelee7766 4 months ago 原來如此😅，以前不在意聽歌，只覺得怎麼消失了。40年後謎解釋，可憐演藝人員的悲哀，希望他們都平安快樂🙏 1 Reply @shaoshen 3 months ago 六〇年代晚期 這首女的嘆息翻譯曲來得正是時候，內容感性，歌壇也缺這樣激情譯曲。多謝莊老師全面介紹、解說。 Reply @kclee9919 1 year ago 我聽這首歌時也很受感動。只是把對國民黨執政的失望投射在這首負心的人上。正如現在火熱的羅煞海。 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @志堅陳-z3l 1 year ago 好聽呀！讓人心崁熱血奔滕來著。禁啥曉？那個八股莫明年代？ 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @永山吳-s3i 1 year ago 這一首歌好像是電影主題曲，好深刻的失戀歌曲，我那時是二、三歲，也是50幾年前的記憶！ 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @西門吉祥 2 weeks ago (edited) 台灣所有的歌曲， 不管國語歌或是台語歌，所有的歌詞百分之99都是分手分離的意思， 做詞者的悲哀，可憐，至今都還不會進步增長智慧， 1 Reply @ichigobagus 1 year ago Only Ms Yao can deliver this song the way it shd be performed 👏 👏 👏 9 Reply @栗田美佐夫-p4k 7 months ago 姚蘇蓉唱得最棒❤ 2 Reply @曹蔡鳳嬌 1 year ago 那個年代真的是太可怕了😱！姚蘇蓉真的好無辜喔！😅 12 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 3 replies @JPLee-zs3wk 1 year ago (edited) 當時負心的人的黑膠LP海山(Haishan)唱片公司賣過滿堂紅，無論是湯蘭花唱的，抑或是姚蘇蓉唱的，銷量都很大，當然連森進 一的"女のためいき"唱片銷量也不錯，所以，當時不覺得這首是禁歌？？ 7 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @劉淑美-k5l 1 year ago 姚蘇蓉唱的最好 6 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @謝先生-f1g 1 year ago 當時很流行 7 Reply @ykc311 1 year ago (edited) 我都覺得姚穌容是歡樂今宵吹出來的，不過一聽湯蘭花一唱，湯真係差好遠。 15 Reply 1 reply @林溢昌-s1k 4 months ago 我林溢昌也是警總受害者的人、至今還裏不清、要抗議！抗議！ Reply @weefen4842 5 months ago 她的声音很独特.喜欢她很多歌曲❤❤❤ 1 Reply @guytruth5598 1 year ago Thank you very much for your information where not many people including me who have known about it 3 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 4 replies @kuangmin-j8x 3 months ago 百聽不厭❤ Reply @ChauWahKwok 1 year ago 負心的人不能唱，那就唱父親的人 10 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @Kmnl200 1 year ago 我們六十年代在台灣聽的歌很多是翻唱日文歌曲，怎麼可能唯獨這一首被禁。 9 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 7 replies @CHONGZAI5880 1 year ago 的确一首非常悲痛、消极和伤感的歌。 8 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @meyou5349 1 year ago 太棒了唷 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @gs3867 1 year ago 日语版更好听。坂本冬美 - 女のためいき- 負心的人最棒 9 Reply 1 reply @ddd1175 10 months ago 回憶童年時的歌，當時物質不豐富什麼都缺但生活比現在有屋有車幸福。 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 3 replies @samujess 3 months ago 好好看 Reply @thomaswong4923 1 year ago 先有歌曲，后有电影 ，当年姚姐旋风是横扫华人世界的。 12 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @davidwang3143 1 year ago 隔著語言，其實除 旋律外，根本就聽不出 日本歌曲 悲情 8 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @劉淑美-k5l 1 year ago 優秀的女歌手 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @bcylee2002 1 year ago (edited) 偶然發現這個頻道 看了幾個影片 覺得實在太棒了 不訂閱實在是我的損失 ! 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @frankyong2607 1 year ago (edited) Yao Su Rong and her emotional method of singing with deep feelings! 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @cdtrieu7487 1 year ago ❤👍 1 Reply @homeinvancouver 1 year ago 台湾也是经历恐怖时期的，只怪她唱得太动情😂😂😂 14 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @addaddla.1151 1 year ago 警輩總部就是吃飽太閒，有什麼好禁的 12 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 3 replies @tsukunaiable 5 months ago Very good. Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @angelachew1601 1 year ago 👍👍👍 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @I_WANT_TO_SING 1 year ago (edited) 姚後來嫁給印尼歌手伍景山。伍罹癌後兩人就離婚了。伍已經離世三十餘年。 6 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @truth8307 1 year ago 负心的人原唱是汤兰花，可能版权卖了给姚苏容的唱片公司所以到现在也没有原版可以买得到。在东南亚红到大街小巷的是汤兰花版，根本没有人听姚苏蓉版，姚苏蓉当时红的歌太多了，尤其是今天不回家。汤兰花因为电影当时比唐寶云，归亚蕾，甄珍更红（张美瑶已经少拍电影了）。视频是不是把姚苏蓉和汤兰花当做一个人？ Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @gusdeng6082 1 year ago Nothing wrong with song.Why banned her in Taiwan????????? Ridiculous. 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @你好-i3y 4 months ago 那是個禁止日文，日語的年代。也禁止日文文化的輸入。我小時候看到裁縫剪裁的書籍，和剪髮技術的書籍，台灣那些師傅看的全都是日文版的，根本就沒有中文版的書！ Reply 1 reply @gccg3646 1 year ago 我記得五六歲時就在戲棚看姚蘇蓉唱這歌和今天不回家，跟著唱但完全不明白歌詞😂 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @pyleung4302 11 months ago 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉我的愛人；有的 Reply @林瑞寅 11 months ago 我那一次被姚蘇蓉嚇到以後，驚魂未定，都60年了，還沒好，姚蘇蓉若還沒作鬼應該是90歲的老嬤k嬤k了 2 Reply 2 replies @哈哈哈-u2e8w 1 year ago (edited) 那是老國民黨時代，才有禁歌。現在沒禁歌了阿。 6 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @samfong2531 9 months ago 😂😂😂，那時的國民黨不知所謂，竟然害怕一首名曲，禁止演唱，這只是一首悲傷的情感歌曲，可以令到警備縂部眈食不安，莫明其妙， Reply @YungHsiang-e8u 1 year ago 警總管的大多了 11 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @pryang-hz7vx 1 year ago 60年代每一首歌绝对經典，加上歌手的演藝绝對傳唱百世不歇 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @nckumem5383 1 year ago 當時我也瘋姚，唱的真好。 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @fredatsen6604 1 year ago Are you sure ! Music is an entertainment, you make up different story, Like this song very much , 3 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @你好-i3y 4 months ago 早期國民黨時代，台灣人和台灣的商人及一些娛樂地方，很多都是唱日語台語歌曲。雖然後來國語的歌曲越來越多，但是對台灣人來說，那些歌唱不來，因為學國語發音很累人。 電視收音機都禁止日文歌曲，日本書籍雜誌也沒有，都被禁止出現。 Reply @黃興興-d5v 11 months ago 當時政府確實是很荒唐極至⋯⋯ 可悲啊 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @YLChan-x2d 1 year ago 原唱者是湯蘭花。是她主演电影主題曲，货真假实.那輪到姚苏蓉是原唱者呢? 11 Reply 6 replies @binyinkao8422 11 months ago (edited) 早期的國台語流行歌曲，幾乎全都是日語演歌或經典歌曲翻譯改編而成，此支歌曲原文是《女のためいき》 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @李冠興-m5j 1 year ago 😊👍👍👍👏👏👏💖 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @YungHsiang-e8u 1 year ago 苦酒滿杯 5 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @angerbird4609 1 year ago 此曲此人，見證了蔣氏國民黨的專制，也為台灣民主歷程的艱辛做了旁註。 民主，不是天上掉下來的，更不是統治者的恩賜，這體制台灣後代應該懂得珍惜與維護，不然你連唱歌的自由都沒有。 27 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 11 replies @J174T 1 year ago 一聽就知道是國民黨會幹的事情。明明說和共產黨不一樣，可是幹得事情都跟共產黨一模一樣 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @dtg.2020 11 months ago 0:07 警備總部 2 Reply @徐大正-i2k 1 year ago 往日專政極權國民黨.今日中共國共產黨.同種一家中國皇朝極權專政.祈禱中國民主化。 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @林瑞寅 11 months ago 那年的航行，2000噸的軍艦在惡浪中翻滾，真是汪洋中一條小船，海中日本陰鬼狂叫，艦上姚鬼的鬼聲應和，鬼海狂號，説有多恐怖就有多恐怖，那一次以後，艦上再也不播音樂了 1 Reply @michelwong1 1 year ago 【負心的人】 什么时候，被台湾当局列为是【 禁唱的歌曲 】？？ 台湾人，出了台湾岛，在亚洲 应该可以唱【負心的人】吧 ！回去会不会坐牢 ？ 是什么人【 負 】了 台湾哪个人的【 心 】 ？？？ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @christinel3902 1 year ago 之前聽的都是謝雷唱的蠻好聽的 2 Reply 1 reply @王歌-r7m 4 months ago (edited) 警備總部當年是鉗制台灣文化的劊子手...式微後台灣文學文化如雨後春荀....是台灣時代的悲歌......當年校園禁說母語放學不能走小路不能抄近路的意思被檢舉要體罰....小時候不懂為什麼長大才知是戒嚴.......造就了一群把母語忘光國語沒學好的怪現象...... Reply @陳高佬-y5n 5 months ago 偉大歌手👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 1 Reply @葉天生-u2w 1 year ago 而---😊 Reply @cheungwing155 1 year ago （今天不回家）???? 1 Reply @chava680215 11 months ago 警備總部閒到蛋疼～～～ 1 Reply @windsorlai7456 1 year ago 禁的應是 今天不用家 理由 靡靡之音 老蔣那時口號是 毋忘在莒 3 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @曹廣勝 1 year ago 負心的人有被禁過？那時代日本作曲加國語歌詞，很多很多啊！ 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @周麗慧-d9h 1 year ago 有可能這首歌讓老蔣想起陳潔如…，所以被禁了 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @moli5092 2 months ago 『70年代反动广播-黄色歌曲』手抄本：https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5TO4YeBS7POmKp3MNVXDDmSiu3XaMxR3 Reply @YutthanaMathalak 2 months ago ❤😅😂😊😊😊❤ 1 Reply @alanwu9479 1 year ago 告密者是誰 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @啟瑞黃-o6c 10 months ago 做賊心虛的人才會禁止啊！ 1 Reply @thanhgiayha9354 3 days ago 日本歌曲多有好聽者.例如："北國之春"為首. Reply @葉秋容-r7j 4 months ago 各人看法、這詞是對深心是不健康~ Reply @wjkwjk3484 4 months ago ［負心的人］也要禁？警察沒事做嗎？警察有問題嗎？？ Reply @nzworkhorse888 5 months ago 禁歌??? Taiwan poison? or HK poison??? According to CCP HK security laws, any poison is died penalty. 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @bohsengchua7122 1 month ago 正确的说：原版日语歌曲，填词为国语歌，这些填词歌曲真是太多太多了....再说，悲情歌曲，也不止这首，感觉第一个提出禁令者，过于主观、个人主义.... Reply @張陵-x1d 5 months ago 警備總司令部，不是警備處。 Reply @labjmh 1 year ago 很難以現在標準指控當年控制歌曲。如果是在大陸，姚蘇蓉的下場不會只是禁唱而已。紅毛女就是。 Reply @林瑞寅 11 months ago 姚蘇蓉唱今天不回家時，歌聲像鬼一樣，真是嚇死人，那時我的軍艦航過巴士海峽，風高浪急，海象惡劣，鬼哭狼嚎，而這裏是二戰時日本海軍船艦遭受美國海軍潛艦攻擊，而死傷無數，死數萬人，沉艦幾百艘，惡海鬼叫毛骨聳然，惡鬼魔女姚蘇蓉，1969年4月，開越南，金蘭灣 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @游朱義-b4i 4 months ago 極權政府。要幹什麼。都不需要理由 Reply @shinwangchen7334 11 months ago 無聊透頂的警總幹嘛禁唱呢？ 1 Reply @jameslo1877 4 months ago 當時的台灣警備總司令部、就是吃飽飯沒事幹、找事 Reply @林清芳-s2v 7 months ago 戒嚴時代國語.台語很多被禁唱 Reply @waynecheung6126 1 year ago 森進一，是否係60年代在日本走紅 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @hksuperman 11 months ago 那個年代的國民黨跟共產黨最大分別只是一個是戰敗而另一個是戰勝而已，都是同一貨色同樣獨裁專制 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @flysky6223 2 months ago 只怕自己贪婪权力衰败的政治，骯髒污垢得無地自容，唱一首爱歌也可捲入去进了!？ Reply @Gnratkcin 1 year ago 負心的黨和為什麼要除習一樣好笑 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @virtualcity2007 4 months ago 苦酒滿杯也被禁唱 Reply @sihungyu7640 1 year ago 為什麼大陸不流行？ 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 6 replies @老牛不以耳代目 1 year ago 碰到.吃軟飯的王八😂😂😂 3 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @gromilin2220 1 year ago 阿😮 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @人王-s4m 1 year ago 我還記得當年有人稱之爲亡國之音 🤔🤔🤔但都是好歌 ✌️ 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 3 replies @ccpailing842 1 year ago 早年應該說是擅長表現女人哀怨的內心。他是陰陽喉。 Reply @阿義朱 8 months ago 那時的國冥黨的警備總司令部是土包子。跟本不懂什麼是音樂？只知道怎樣慘害演員歌星。 Reply @你好-i3y 4 months ago 國民黨時期，台灣還在唱日本流行歌曲，但好像都不能唱日文歌。只能把曲拿來，用中文填譜吧！ Reply @王樹森-y3c 1 year ago ❤_ Reply @lkk331 1 year ago 這是哪個政黨幹的？😮 2 Reply 1 reply @tony116411 1 month ago 不知有這樣故事，先母很喜歡今天不回家，負心的人一般。警介十分攪笑。影响民心？一首歌？ Reply @cheungshuiyeung5081 1 year ago 致香港竄逃到台湾的小黄人们, 你们都说中国香港没有言论自由, 共产政府用高压手段打击一切正常的反对声音, 所以你们去台湾呼吸一口自由的空气, 那么请问一下你们对这件事情的看法如何？😂😂 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @人王-s4m 2 months ago 中共國根本冇能力作出這麼好聽的歌 😂😂😂😂 Reply @lscheung5126 4 months ago 禁唱? 聞所未聞。 Reply @國華莊 6 months ago 為什麼YouTube口音都是大陸口音？OMG悲哀悲哀真悲哀。 #統戰真的太可怕了 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @孟宏林-l4i 1 year ago 副贛的認吧？ Reply @鮑昉 1 year ago 這是70歲的人在聽的，真是閒到亂放歌.. 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @尹新華 5 months ago 好象唱成不幸的人。感觉 Reply @szeming143 1 year ago Xi的世界還不是一樣 1 Reply @mikesham1203 4 months ago 以前有演唱証？ 國民黨的鐵拳套路與某黨差唔多！ Reply @chaucheunglo4821 5 months ago 60年代台灣應該唱東方紅，不唱 負心的人。 Reply @markmuller3687 1 year ago 😢。你们知道大陆的_（知青之歌）_作者的下场吗？ 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @pyleung4302 1 year ago 唔好乱噏； 我还在hkg 🎉 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @eric0kinge 1 year ago 唱法是学的日本的 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @queenielai8463 2 weeks ago 謝雷唱得不好聽， 姚蘇蓉很煽情 Reply @SWTAN-JEFFREY 4 months ago TALK too much. brief would be better Reply @vandatlu 11 months ago 一派胡言 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @anthonyperry5233 5 months ago 老蔣想起想陸 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @柏木玉桜 1 year ago 😂 Reply @アランパーソンプロジェクト 1 year ago (edited) 胡說八道的據說..🤣🤣你把台湾當成了時大陸共產黨了吧🤣🤣🤣🤣 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @cookiewe1233 4 months ago 請不要旁說、打亂了人家聽覺⋯⋯ Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @july_wu 1 year ago 能不能不要用这个烂大街的机器人声音😅 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @lukelin9328 4 months ago 以前台湾很多歌多源自日本调调，撕心裂肺，大声哀嚎，听一两首还好，男男女女都这么嚎叫，真的不是那么回事 Reply @huhongchao8965 1 year ago 應是湯蘭花，當年唱到街知巷聞，湯蘭難電影及歌唱從此掘起。 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @林庄-n5r 1 year ago 這是國民黨的最大的政績⋯⋯ 2 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @凉水-h9u 1 year ago (edited) 記得台灣的演員脫線仔在一部連續劇傻俠行江湖 裡演怪俠,來無影去無蹤, 結果蔣介石看了說荒唐 ! 人怎麼可能一下子從一個地方不見了然後出現在另一個地方, 違反常識 違反科學　，下令不准再演歐陽大俠，😂😂😂 4 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 4 replies @簡相逢 8 months ago ❤天理昭彰.国民党胡人胡搞.~永遠失去政權！！ 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @choujoel8537 1 year ago 胡說八道！根本就沒有這麼一回事 ！ 3 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @陳怡文-i3v 1 year ago 唱的太悲了也太油了 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 2 replies @xiaojuanli6175 1 year ago ️报导太长气令厌 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @行方-x2m 8 months ago 當年女主角是演王宝钏紅的王復蓉可是王復蓉去结婚不眷恋电影所认20歲的湯蘭花的處女作. 1 Reply @LWL-222 1 year ago 评述者是要说明咋?牛头不订马嘴。 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @waiyunfung6755 1 year ago 向日葵,今天不回家也被禁唱。 1 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @CollDott 5 months ago (edited) 我不觉得有不妥之处😂😂😂😂 有些歌曲甚至有性交时的叫声， 有的有放屁声， 也没见被禁啊！！ Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @凡心-u7m 11 months ago 國民黨惡跡又一例 Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply @chuasong3173 1 year ago 原来是这样啊 被禁止 1 Reply @chanwancheong8264 11 months ago 废话连篇！ Reply 莊臣音樂 Classic Music Channel · 1 reply

Michael Jackson - Billie Jean - Live Munich 1997- Widescreen HD

Top 5 Michael Jackson Dance Routines That Are Impossible to Copy

Top 5 Michael Jackson Dance Routines That Are Impossible to Copy MJ Forever 273K subscribers Join Subscribe 18K Share Download Thanks Clip 1,068,999 views Oct 24, 2024 #MichaelJackson #KingOfPop Are you ready to see the most mind-blowing dance routines that even the best dancers struggle to perfect? Michael Jackson was a dance icon, and in this video, we’re diving into 5 Michael Jackson dance routines that are nearly impossible to copy! From the legendary Remember The Time to the jaw-dropping 2 Bad, we’ll show you why these moves are untouchable. Whether you're a fan of MJ or a dancer trying to learn, this breakdown will leave you amazed. Chapters -: 00:00 Intro 01:14 Jam (This is it Rehearsal) 01:59 Dangerous AMA 1993 03:27 Remember The Time 04:51 Scream 06:09 2 Bad Ghosts Instagram : / mjforever_official Facebook : / mjforeverofficial Twitter : / themjforever _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MJ Forever is a dedicated Michael Jackson channel. Thank you for being part of this great family, do not forget to like it if you liked the video, subscribe so you do not miss the new videos and please activate the 🔔 notification bell. See you very soon! 💜 🙏 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, Allowance is made for "fair use" for the purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. This video is for entertainment purpose what based of net articles. Some images used in this video is for reference purpose only. Note: All the Photos are taken from Google Image search by using advanced image search option. Usage rights: "free to use, share And modify . Grateful to Google for the information. Information And media courtesy https://images.google.com _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 🎵 Music: https://www.epidemicsound.com/ #MichaelJackson #KingOfPop #MJdances Chapters View all Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript MJ Forever 273K subscribers Videos About Instagram Facebook Twitter 8:13 The Dark Side of Michael Jackson's Record Breaking Success & Fame by MJ Forever 1,231 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @user-ks5le2tn8f 2 days ago The ONLY time a musician could deliver BOTH fantastic music and perfect dance moves. Elvis and others can't compare. Reply @ClaraMadridSnaer 3 days ago Nothing more annoying than someone explaining dance movements or explaining a joke. Reply @louiswilliams4657 3 days ago Mike was simply well Mike ! Reply @rhomai 3 days ago you didnt mention he was also singing Reply @davidjsaul 4 days ago Impossible? Challenge accepted. ... ... ... Yeah, ima need new hips, knees and ankles 1 Reply @mandyharewood886 4 days ago To be honest, I never saw any of the back up dancers. 3 Reply @sliceserve234 5 days ago the voice over is SO annoying 2 Reply @andrewjanicek9584 5 days ago l remember the first time they played thriller video at the local disco---evybody stopped dancing and just watched 2 Reply @jakraven692 6 days ago Any competent dancer could duplicate his routines lol. Get real. 2 Reply @bobogachie 6 days ago your obviously not a dancer, alot of the things your saying are completely inaccurate, buut, I get sensationalism, just for the record, all, not some, all mj routines are pretty basic, and this is coming from a complete mj fan, learnt them when i was 12 yrs old 1 Reply 2 replies @agastronics 8 days ago MJ is the LORD of dancer and pop in the entire universe 3 Reply 1 reply @dranrebsales 13 days ago That was his own choreography. Its iscriprlted. Many people can do mj moves.. 1 Reply @rastanz 2 weeks ago The King of Pop, and a maestro of dance! The way he pops and locks is ridiculously tight and on point. Also props to his dancers, takes talent to dance with MJ and they shone as brightly as he did. 4 Reply @thatsmysolstice1584 2 weeks ago Every new MJ video was a world wide event and us fans were glued to the tv to not only watch but experience a joy and magic only Michael could deliver. He kept bringing more and more to each new video which seemed an impossible task but HE DID IT - EVERY SINGLE TIME. ❤❤❤ 7 Reply @beliveth003 2 weeks ago Congratulations to the dancers of those times. MJ was a genius, but the dancers brought the sparkle to the coreographies.🎉🎉 4 Reply @CoffeeCrazy 2 weeks ago Let’s give the props to the inventors of Michaels move. 🎉🎉🎉🎉 to the choreographers. I thought Michael was good dancer but Look at the dancers on the dangerous stage. Especially the one on the left, they were outstanding. But background dancers are not suppose to outshine the star hence why clothing and shoes are meant to draw attention to the entertainer. I also believe that Janet is a better dancer. 3 Reply 2 replies @TinaHuangPhD 2 weeks ago dancers have improved immensely since then. I don't think he'd have any problems finding sensational backup dancers now. Dancers get training in far more styles these days than back then! 4 Reply @nataliehidalgo8933 2 weeks ago When did he start grabbing his balls, or lack thereof? 1 Reply @danmac579 2 weeks ago King of Pop… more like God of Pop. There will never be an equal, not in our lifetime. 6 Reply @BeansNBeer 3 weeks ago 2 bad was elite aura ❤ 2 Reply @arnitahill6023 3 weeks ago Janet said she wasn’t in the same room with Michael while dancing 2 Reply @alicia2931 3 weeks ago Nah michael had an injury. He wouldn’t even go there if he wasn’t confident. He was performing 20+ years before the remember the time performance 9 Reply @roball711 3 weeks ago The reason why Michael was so great with his dances is because his dance or his choreography is short quick and he does it with such smoothness. It looks like it’s effortless that’s why his dance is so great cause it looks easy but it’s not and he was so damn smooth… Jesus Christ he was so smooth. 2 Reply @SutboxSutty 3 weeks ago Hes. just. ....BAD........ 2 Reply @eddiesmith5617 3 weeks ago When Scream came out...I just knew MJ and JJ were gonna do an album together. It's one of the biggest tragedies in entertainment history (that didn't involve somebody passing away prematurely). That one song was huge. Imagine an album with the right producer(s). At the time that album came out, Teddy Riley was still the man. But Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis were also still not to far from their prime era. I would have bet money that this album was going to get made. At that time, it would have been a sure bet. Goes to show you, no such thing as a sure bet. 2 Reply @eddiesmith5617 3 weeks ago My God y'all are misinformed like a mofo. MJ didn't fake an injury. He actually was injured with a broken foot, which is WHY he performed in a chair. If you're gonna do videos, especially about someone your channel is dedicated to...Get your facts right. smfh. 2 Reply @eddiesmith5617 3 weeks ago It was the work ethic. PERIOD. Talent? Absolutely. But MJ's work ethic was equal to only one other human being who's equally great with the same initials "MJ." Yes, Michael Jordan. When you mix raw, natural talent with an extreme "hard hat" work ethic...You get MJ. When the guy who's first in the class studies like he's last in the class...You get MJ. 2 Reply @craiggilchrist4223 3 weeks ago You Tube Copyright make videos like this impossible. 1 Reply @Gymcoach1 3 weeks ago MJ forever!!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤ 2 Reply @teliciasmith3552 3 weeks ago He's a bad man baby 2 Reply @pfranks75 3 weeks ago MJ could never get over being bullied by his brothers! 1 Reply @terrireynolds952 3 weeks ago Said it before ~ will say it again: simply CANNOT WAIT TO SEE MICHAEL IN HEAVEN...along w/many others. I have much faith... Peace 1 Reply @AFRoSHEENT3ARCMICHAEL69 3 weeks ago MJ was like the Bruce Lee of song and dance. Not to mention he dressed like a king. 5 Reply @Roundboxstudio-k5d 3 weeks ago That's my boy, pure, raw and natural talent!!!🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤😅😅😅 11 Reply @shafquatali6290 3 weeks ago Watch prabhu dev dance he is more skilled than Micheal Jackson 😊 1 Reply 1 reply @robinsinpost 3 weeks ago That was a lot of talking. 2 Reply @starkest 1 month ago MJ was not in his 50s. He died at 50 12 Reply @sethmarchese397 1 month ago Great video. I enjoyed your take. 10 Reply MJ Forever · 1 reply @signforu 1 month ago All I hear is you talking. Show the f*cking dances. Talking about dance is like moonwalking a book. What’s wrong with you? 9 Reply @tashasmith2148 1 month ago And he was alegitly a vegetarian ❤ 3 Reply @Ptjoker24 1 month ago those who grew up with the wii if you aint have michael jackson experince aint spell dat right bu you will never know the difficulty of just remember the time smooth criminal ghost talk about an experience. He is the best crazy how i barely got to see him 04 baby 3 Reply @Mel-x7m 1 month ago You're missing something. MJ said REPEATEDLY that he couldn't take credit for his talent. MJ was always in complete flow and channeling a higher power, that is what he was saying. Call the higher power God, the Universe...it matters not, that is what he was telling people. (and it's got nothing to do with religion). 11 Reply 1 reply @freesunique 1 month ago The commentator said that Michael was still a great dancer in his 50's; Michael Jackson died at age 50. 13 Reply @sequoiabush698 1 month ago He will forever hold that title! 8 Reply @therealdeal6012 1 month ago It's impossible to be a better dancer than MJ 15 Reply 1 reply @RitaWamunyima-k8q 1 month ago Michael was a genius 12 Reply @angelcsw 1 month ago YEAH!!!! Ghosts is agressive, beautiful, hard, perfect!!! The steps are not easy, so the transition ....MICHAEL had that perfect emotion to dance all of them. All thre dancers were fantastic, of course....but Michael, in the front line, was spectacular. I'm note sure who was or were the choreographer fpr Ghosts. LaVelle? Travis? Colaboration between Michael, LaVelle and Travis?? 12 Reply @laurieday9976 1 month ago The most talented person of our time. 12 Reply @paragon7934 1 month ago If Mike was white, he would have a holiday. Not enough credit. Mike is a genius that connected the world. Single handedly made America a media giant. He made music universal 14 Reply 1 reply @amusicunlimited 1 month ago I would have Preferred to Watch the Videos, rather than Your Constant Talking. 10 Reply @Tucholsky59 1 month ago Why are you talking the whole time, instead of showing these acts with the music? disappointing 8 Reply @lucindagreat5119 1 month ago God's most wonderful creation was MJ. 8 Reply 1 reply @lucindagreat5119 1 month ago His movements were just unbeatable. 7 Reply @mackgwin 1 month ago JAM is by far my FAVORITE ❤❤❤❤ 3 Reply @miaubella 1 month ago He would always top himself; he was his biggest competition. The King. 4 Reply @jmcassonetto 1 month ago The movements of some of his BU dancers were definitely not as refined as mj ... some where probably a little to muscular which restricted their moves & flow , since mj has lankier body type. 3 Reply @ConsuelaErwin 1 month ago Watch Bob Fosse and you will see where he got his ideas. I watched a documentary and showed some of the moves of Bob Fosse that MJ used as well. 1 Reply @TheKelvinatorChronicles 1 month ago Michael didn't fake his injury during the live performance of Remember The Time. He got bitten by his snake on his leg 3 Reply 1 reply @kimberlypetrossi6607 1 month ago I like MJ but , I love Bruno Mars! ❤😊 1 Reply @likethecolorgreen 1 month ago You can hardly find anyone copying remember the time. 7 Reply 1 reply @latonyanewsome0 1 month ago A lot of haters in these comments. 3 Reply @lindianfranklin8673 1 month ago My fav was remember the time da ce moves 5 Reply 1 reply @nigeltrigger4499 1 month ago And yet in every video, the background dancers match his moves - this is a stupid video! 4 Reply 4 replies @lynettep7015 1 month ago Yes, his dance was mesmerizing - he gave himself away to the supernatural. 4 Reply @icare4you123 1 month ago I always hated the crotch grab. It's even worse now that I'm older. It's obscene. 8 Reply 4 replies @eleanorharville5302 1 month ago 🎉While enjoying his talents, he shared with us, until! Michael just wore and burned his light out!! Rest Michael ❤ 2 Reply 1 reply @lkwdbbw85 1 month ago MJ dancing he's seems to be grabbing his private parts. Makes me uncomfortable to watch. 5 Reply 1 reply @BostonHorticulture 1 month ago He was perfect in His own way. He just wasnt told enough❤ 4 Reply @ShaunDonnelly-gz2bv 1 month ago Look everyone ts not hard to do the dance moves you have to feel the rhythm of the beat and I can do his moves because of break dancing that's all pop licking and practicing in the mirror that's all Michael Jackson done the same thing he danced n the studio in the mirror until he got the moves perfectly that's how you do it I been in music and I also was a break dancer years ago in the 00s it's practice practice until u get it right 3 Reply @DonnaTaw-z8d 1 month ago It is very possible. Just ask any dancer who performed Bob Fosse's choreography. Michael lifted quite A bit. Watch Fosse perform in The Little Prince. 3 Reply @Blackoleander623 1 month ago It’s not that deep lol. Lots of dancers now days can easily do these dances. I definitely think Chris in particular can do it Reply 3 replies @masxworld 1 month ago MJ is often imitated but never duplicated. He was a very special talent that only comes once in all lifetime. 8 Reply 2 replies @a.c.harris1898 1 month ago 🔥❤ 2 Reply @rnyak2208 1 month ago And yet you will hear people comparing MJ with the micky mouse artist from these days who is Taylor Swift , Beyonce come on 6 Reply 1 reply @orange222... 1 month ago It's said Michael didn't like that remember the time dancing and it much simpler than any of his other dances. The video was fun and had good costumes but anyone that knows how to dance realizes that aint much Reply @skywalker6648 1 month ago (edited) This is why so many younger entertainers don't appear as great to the Gen Y, Gen X, or Boomers because MJ, Prince, and a few others around that time set the bar really high when it comes to performing their songs. Even Beyonce has not reached that level. But She, Chris Brown, and Usher come the closest. 4 Reply 3 replies @janboll7174 1 month ago What gets me is, Elvis' dance moves were called trashy but it was OK for MJ to 'hump his hand' in his dances - I would say he was trashier than Elvis! I do like his moves other than that. 2 Reply 5 replies @alicedesmond4336 1 month ago The Nicholas brothers were just as good. 3 Reply @erlincoln1 1 month ago As much as I like MJ, you don't know what you are talking about. Michael copied a lot of urban dance moves that were already done and perfected. His Moonwalk, was at least 7 years old and it was not called the Moonwalk. If you recall, he had two teenage breakdancers teach him that move. The Moonwalk was an entirely different dance.. If you want to see impressive and difficulty choreography, look at Beyonce. But most of Michaels moves could have been seen on SOUL TRAIN prior to him doing it on video or on stage. So please, any dancer, worth their salt better have stamina and timing. Look up the choreographer of each of those videos and you will see the same moves performed by several other people. What was impressive was that at his age, and as big a star as he was, he took the risk to continue to perform and possibly making a mistake or even hurting himself. Most accomplished dancers don't know when to stop until their body is injured and breaks down beneath them. Michael was suffering just such a thing. His last film and tour were held up because of it. He did some amazing things, but please, just because you could not dance that way, please don't insult those of us who could. 2 Reply 2 replies @erlincoln1 1 month ago Stop it. Michael was a dancer, but not a choreographer. He was taught each of those moves including his "Moonwalk" Granted, he was fantastic, but there was no movement that a professional could not repeat. 3 Reply 1 reply @bernardtalbert6729 1 month ago Smooth Criminal should be on this list. 4 Reply 1 reply @stephensonwhite7963 1 month ago No one comes close to his dance moves 5 Reply @traceyesste2271 1 month ago 4:39 1 Reply @randythemitoman 1 month ago Wish Michael and Janet worked together more. 9 Reply @trudyvaccaro1560 1 month ago He's been rehearsing since he was a toddler He had all the best teachers He was too perfect!!! Michael is a created character Played by prince Carl philip 4 Reply @CQQLBREEZE 1 month ago Michael Faked an Injury to get interviews and News coverage and Attention. Like Janet flashing a Nip at the Superbowl Halftime.Genius. Hustling is the oldest profession in the world. Sometimes it goes wrong like hanging a baby off a balcony, or Pac & Biggie getting murrkkd.We aren’t sure for sure who started it, but someone went along with it, two great artists died for our entertainment, while the Music Industry and Record Labels Capitalized. It still goes on today, you just gotta pay attention. BTW, MJ is my favorite artist, please don’t take it like I’m bashing his Person. Long Live The King. Reply 1 reply @luckyikaneng7038 1 month ago THOSE ARE NOT HIS HE HAS CHOREOGRAPHERS STOP LYING .MC HAMMER DANCE MOVES ARE DIFFICULT TO COPY THATS WHY NO ONE HAS EVER DONE THE YOU CANT TOUCH THESE MOVE TO DATE 3 Reply 3 replies @පොලිටික් 1 month ago Dance forever 2 Reply @rhondamcdow4603 1 month ago ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 1 Reply @slickbronx 1 month ago #Thriller 2 Reply @sinatra7407 1 month ago But hold on, what about singing? At a live show, he is singing and dancing, so why no mention of that? 9 Reply @florivladutescu5085 1 month ago No smooth criminal? Seriously .?! That's like his best choreography 19 Reply @SouthernBella2460 1 month ago God bless Micheal Jackson....Still so hard to watch him while hes not alive😪😪😪.....RIP my brother🙏🥰❤ 13 Reply @de-angelol4073 1 month ago Smooth Criminal should be #1 8 Reply @Anfisia888 1 month ago WHEN MICHAEL JACKSON♾️👑🫶🏼🌏❤️🙏🏼 SINGS, IT IS WITH THE VOICE OF ANGELS, AND WHEN HIS FEET MOVE, YOU CAN SEE GOD DANCING♾️👑🫶🏼🌏❤️🙏🏼 6 Reply @lindavandebogart873 1 month ago michael may have had EHLERS DANLOS! he was in a lot of pain -- thats what killed him, trying to control the pain 5 Reply 1 reply @Marty-i3e 1 month ago (edited) NOBODY WILL EVER DANCE LIKE MICHAEL ❤️ HE WAS THE BEST ❤❤I COULD WATCH MICHAEL DANCE EVERY DAY ❤❤ THE MUSIC WAS LITERALLY INSIDE HIM ..MISSING MICHAEL EVERY DAY 😢 11 Reply @andersen6422 1 month ago (edited) He really was dedicated and talented. To be honest though, I stopped watching when he could not take his hands off his crotch. I felt it was vile and disrespectful although I'd been a fan since he was a boy. 5 Reply @饒碧珍 1 month ago 前無古人, 後無來者. MJ是永遠的神, 也是唯一的神. MJ is a unique legend of every GENERATION ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ love ML so much. 3 Reply @stephanrichmond718 1 month ago Mike was the GOAT but I wouldn't say it's impossible to copy!!!! Y'all ever heard of a kid named Chris Brown???? Just because of the era I was raised in I won't disrespect Mike by saying Chris is better but he definitely can redo any Mike dance routines 3 Reply 7 replies @shaolin95 1 month ago Bogaloo Shrimp and Pop N Taco Reply @brammerd1040 1 month ago Even in his aging body he felt no pain Reply @jamesbrockingtonjr.6676 1 month ago I know brother and sister c'mon now 😁 Reply @nancyrudell5544 1 month ago When does Michael stop during Remember the Time ? Reply @cristianonascimentodasilva9773 1 month ago O. Michael. Nunca. Estudou. Danca. Aprendeu. Por. Si. Propio. Tinha. A. Leveza. Que. Poucos. Tem era. Um. Dancarino. Nato Reply @cristianonascimentodasilva9773 1 month ago Moichael. E. Sua. Genialidade. Ele. Misturava. A. Elegancia. A. Sensualide. Michael. King. Goat❤ 1 Reply @Marasovsbuttcheeksareblu 1 month ago ❤MJ❤ 2 Reply @Malaki727 2 months ago Mike didn't make up his routines. He had a team He is not the best dancer. 1 Reply 2 replies @terrireynolds952 2 months ago Simply cannot wait to see MJ in heaven...along w/a lot of other people that has gone before me... Peace 2 Reply @apatsa_basiteni 2 months ago Decades later still entertaining us 5 Reply @Katherine-rq8mk 2 months ago Genius 5 Reply @yvonnek4925 2 months ago ❤MJ dance move. 4 Reply @roostfezza7563 2 months ago So silly. "Impossible to copy" . While a dozen dancers are behind him doing just that, in every clip. Lets have a professional dance instructor(s) narrate this with informed observations. 15 Reply 4 replies @RichardHendrix-d4b 2 months ago Shut up. Shut up, shut up, shut up. Shut up! Let this speak for itself. When you're doing this, do your quick talk and then let us watch the whole excerpt and then go on to the next one. You're talking all the way through everything and it's indeterminate as to what we're supposed to be. Seeing. This means you really don't have anything to post. 3 Reply @gianinavillegas-ty-kv3pe 2 months ago What a great video! 1 Reply @isaiahadams1996 2 months ago I say it’s pretty much all of them 1 Reply @JarppaGuru 2 months ago i seen many that do same copy paste Reply 1 reply @dejavue546 2 months ago He had a routine since he was a child and later a mix of drugs to keep him going Reply @laurensmith4622 2 months ago My only challenge is that Michael and Janet didn’t dance together on scream. Janet worked through the day and Michael at night. From an interview done with Janet 1 Reply 1 reply @AnneEloiseOfCNY 2 months ago Not even Gregory Hinds, who founded the Dance Theater of Harem, could coreograph and then dance like Michael. The King of Pop! 4 Reply @naomik5681 2 months ago Gen z think bts is mj, lol. 3 Reply 2 replies @VicToria-sd1dn 2 months ago The guy who invented "some" of the most iconic dances moves in history. Noooo! He invented ALL the most iconic dance moves in history. Watch all his videos, all the current and past dance moves are copied from Michael Jackson's videos. He's being closely studied by the younger generation, they just cant figure him out. Michael Jackson is the GOAT. 4 Reply @MegaLorki 2 months ago (edited) I think we all agree that MJ added an expression and personal flavor to his dance moves that made them look extraordinary and unique. On the other hand he was extremely dedicated in soaking up choreography until people from outside thought these were the steps he created. As far as for example Smooth Criminal is concerned, the choreographer Vincent Paterson said that Michael's contribution was small changes to the group routines but in fact MJ choreographed only the solo parts in the video. Not to take anything away from MJ's magic but of course the choreographies were made first hand for him to shine. Nothing wrong about it but if one of his backup dancers would have been in spotlight to their own music, he would have also struggled to keep up with their moves. 2 Reply @pqsnet 2 months ago Wrong. I copied Michael to perfection as a 13 year old child, both ways, mirrored and the correct way. And his background dancers were never even close to his moves. Also, most people dont even know how to do moonwalk correct, in fact, Michael him self changed his moonwalk several times. But his best was at his Billie Jean premiere 1983, In Bucharest Dangerous Tour 1992 and on MTV Music awards 1995, not to mention the inivisible wall lock-turning and Robot walk. Infact, when i saw Michael in 98 at Sweden Göteborg Ullevi, i was disappointed. Because he was far from his best days. His dance moves was not up to paar. Thats how much of a perfectionist i was. 1 Reply @Nikkimommyof4 2 months ago I have to wonder though. If he was pulling so much out of himself during every rehearsal and performance what was making it so hard for him to get the rest he so desperately needed but couldn't get? Why did he need to beg his doctor to give him Propofol to help him to sleep? I'll never understand that. There had to have been a better way to help him if he and his family had only looked harder to find it. Clearly his body would have been exhausted enough to need the rest considering how demanding his job was especially at that time in his life. It makes me sad thinking about it. 2 Reply 5 replies @Chrissybimhotep 2 months ago Michael Jackson = He is not human and not of this universe. Only GOD is better than him. The GREATEST human being ever.️️️️️ 6 Reply @AntonioJones-sc8mk 2 months ago I think that Mr.Jacksons Dance Roetines couldn’t be copied because,I think that when he danced,it wasn’t practiced, it was improvised. 3 Reply 1 reply @LetsTakeWalk 2 months ago (edited) 1:35 Yeah so, Michael died at age 50. Was he just going Thriller zombie mode? 1 Reply @kellyvandijk3269 2 months ago Michael was dancing on feeling✌️🇳🇱 13 Reply @maryjomarcum4635 2 months ago For sure he was a good dancer but did he have to grab his crotch so much? I find that ridiculous and kinda gross 6 Reply 3 replies @bosslifethebusiness 2 months ago (edited) King of pop king of dance king of music 6 Reply @ronsturdivant317 2 months ago Kids at street level have mastered many of Michael's moves and dances. 5 Reply 3 replies @gokararavikumar6562 2 months ago mj always the king of pop.. 7 Reply @vikkilawson27 2 months ago Prince gave him a run for his money! 3 Reply 1 reply @AnushBalasanyan-u7w 2 months ago MJ❤ 4 Reply @michaelabu1370 2 months ago He's just a class unrivalled 9 Reply @o.ch.5334 2 months ago Toll Reply @Wesley-bu4ht 2 months ago That robot dance should have been number one that he did with his brothers 6 Reply @lisaherrick2610 2 months ago So where was the part he stopped and looked unsure. Many of these routines while great are duplicated by others and they have variations of the same movements from other routines. I did not see anything here as special as indicated in the title. 2 Reply 1 reply @MeredithDrennan 2 months ago MJ was 50 when he died. He wasn't dancingin his 50s. 2 Reply 5 replies @reneeciddio6926 2 months ago Michael Jackson’s talents, varied and did put him in a league of his own in each and every single category, dance, songwriting, music voice performance being able to dance and sing with extreme talent in both. Michael Jackson will always be the King of a lot of things. There will never be another Michael Jackson actually don’t believe that. Prince, Elvis. They were Kings and their own categories as well, and then their own style of music, songwriting and dance. And there will never be another at their level either. But Michael Jackson I think it’s more than just a king. I think he’s a phenomenon. 10 Reply @stephanes. 2 months ago I always thought 2Bad was the most difficult dance choregraphy… 3 Reply 1 reply @medusabrown420 2 months ago Michael was the Satchel Paige of Dance!❤ 1 Reply @persiphonehellecat 2 months ago I just wish he didn't have to touch his junk so much. 4 Reply @jwalk31 2 months ago Impossible?? I literally used to teach an MJ Style class to beginners who just love Michael Jackson music. They learned not only my choreo, but ALL the MJ dance routines. Remember The Time being one of them, and yes, Michael's part, because THEY wanted to learn it. i had to teach Jam, Smooth criminal and Dangerous live performances to 4 professional dancers for a MJ tribute show with a MJ impersonator, and they learned them with relative ease. i had to learn all these routines myself for a decade long career of perfoming as Michael and did it. So what are you talking about? 1 Reply 2 replies @adina9803 2 months ago He was the Fred Astaire of our time. 5 Reply 1 reply @UK1491 2 months ago This is so frustrating. Michael Jackson is undoubtedly one of the greatest. However, claiming his routine is impossible to copy, including his freestyle moments, is an outrageous statement. Just last night, I watched a talented young man perform Michael’s choreography for Remember the Time—not the backup dancers' part, but Michael's. Don’t believe me? Ask, and I’ll share the link. As a dancer and big Michael fan, saying his choreography is impossible when thousands of people online are doing it is absurd. With that said i still love the video and gave a like . love watching Michael dance and the stuff u pointed out was nice to hear. 2 Reply 2 replies @davefischer7189 2 months ago A MUSICAL GENIUS.....gone too soon................I miss HIM, I miss his music 5 Reply @pamelaangulo5976 2 months ago He was always the best dancer on the stage...always. 9 Reply @kentwaters5903 2 months ago They look ugly in this video, not my favorite video 1 Reply 1 reply @kentwaters5903 2 months ago He worked so hard and was such a perfectionist I understand why he needed a full time doctor who pumped him with sedatives 2 Reply @anahung2182 2 months ago ❤❤❤ Reply @ColinMarks-r6n 2 months ago Pop lock dance of king of pop Michael Jackson Reply @velenjak4ever 2 months ago Seriously! As far as modern dance goes, he was at least very good, but from a technical point he would not last 10 minutes with Fred Astaire who was the King of perfectionism! How about classic ballet! Try to do 30 perfect pirouettes in a row. We are talking about years of hard training. Period!!! 5 Reply 11 replies @JoeyColeman-km4uu 2 months ago He is the king of pop for a reason 7 Reply @JoeyColeman-km4uu 2 months ago I was born in 1962i I grew up through the years watching the Jackson 5 and watched the cartoon of them him and his family are so talented he died to young I wish he was still alive to watch some more of his talent my brother and cousins said the victory tour they said it was awesome my sister loved Michael Jackson when she was younger like I always said what is not to love❤😮😢😊😅😅we love you mj your spirit will live on 2 Reply 1 reply @MrTommy0326 2 months ago MJ was awesome ! 7 Reply @moki4541 2 months ago Michael Jackson was the kinda guy who can dodge rain 2 Reply @JanetGregory-fj1pm 2 months ago He was one of the greatest dancers and singers. 5 Reply @eliannequintero4720 2 months ago I can't even learn a TikTok trend 3 Reply @gabriellacondie8120 2 months ago Mich would NEVERRRR fake and injury no matter what. This man had the most drive out of all musicians in the entire world, and everyone knows he would do anything for people to enjoy his music. 8 Reply @akumatenshi2004 2 months ago Thing people don’t realize is if it wasn’t for MJ, the dancers now wouldn’t be as creative. He set the bar and other dancers use his moves as inspiration to create their version. Creativity starts somewhere and he’s the one who gives that spark 10 Reply @Oghar999 2 months ago (edited) I'm such a big fan of Michael, his music and his dancing. But this vid is just blablabla I don't really know his ancestors and legacy (James, Fred, Vaudeville) and show some lame clips which hardly show his excellence. Impossible my assss. Man, do him justice or go home! 5 Reply @PinkUrbanOasis 2 months ago I saw him live twice... O2 would have been third. ❤ MJ forever 5 Reply @melwignal 2 months ago Yes MJ dance moves were supernatural I'll give him that. 6 Reply @VirginiaHanslien 2 months ago This video would be better if they had added the music!!! 8 Reply 1 reply @Lionofthelovinggod1 2 months ago If so many of MJ’s dance routines are quote- impossible to copy- then it occurs to me that he might just be a hologram. 4 Reply 3 replies @kichukichumon2934 2 months ago ❤ 1 Reply @soulcontrolwo6088 2 months ago Impossible is a stretch kids and adults on Tik Tok is doing a good job copying him as we speak 8 Reply 1 reply @carlymarz8356 2 months ago I hope you see this so i can be the one to let you know you are NOT as good with words as you think. " Dancing isn't just dancing, its ALSO a full body work out" hahhaha uhm duh 6 Reply @davebaconusa1062 2 months ago Hard to copy is not “impossible” to copy. Ugh 7 Reply @fredgreene6566 2 months ago (edited) He really hurt his foot on the remember the time cheorgraph because their is footage of him practicing it online he could easily do the cheorgraph on it 5 Reply @lolo1973ful 2 months ago Yes the full body work I can concur with that. For me it was Football and BasketBall which helped adapt 2 Reply @vanessawilliams2771 2 months ago I just have one question. Why was Michael putting his hand down by his crouch???? 3 Reply 4 replies @lbj4993 2 months ago More music and less chatter/narration would have been nice. As it is it's mostly guys moving to dead silence which is weird. 5 Reply @nomeled 2 months ago Almost as good as bollywood dancers 2 Reply 3 replies @handayanihenny32 2 months ago In Bali, we name it 'Taksu' ❤ 2 Reply @KALICOE 2 months ago Impossible 😂we had this down at two😂 2 Reply @gloriamadaffari5404 2 months ago I still wonder why he always had to fondle his crotch during his dance routines. 4 Reply 1 reply @elaineprice7870 2 months ago MJ 4ever ❤️❤️❤️ 3 Reply @almagarcia8838 2 months ago You exaggerated a lot there are many good dancers 7 Reply @gerald4384 2 months ago I Loooove MJ. But, the video is over-sale. The moves are not that hard. 2 Reply @bfnfamily 2 months ago Truly gifted. 4 Reply @dad7130 2 months ago None of his dances were impossible to copy, in fact, he copied ALL of his moves. The moonwalk was first introduced by Bill Bailey in the 1920s 8 Reply 4 replies @nirmalasookdeo2771 3 months ago Forever and ever with MJ❤❤❤❤ 3 Reply @retromojo1 3 months ago he danced pretty good for a child mollester 2 Reply 5 replies @susanfudge1737 3 months ago The grabbing the crotch is so cringe. 5 Reply 2 replies @ruperect1 3 months ago His guitar playing was awesome. Amazing Pianist. Played the Violin like the devil himself. And what about his work with the Trumpet. WHAT A MUSICIAN ! :) Look, writing poetry and dancing about like a little girl isn't something grown men admire, it just isn't, no matter who's doing it. Everyone loves Mick Jagger but he the same, writes poetry and dances about like a fool. This isn't the behaviour of a masculine man's man. If you're a guy and you write poetry and dance about you are actually considered to be a big poof. I don't care if you're the lead singer of Led Zep or you're Marilyn Mason, Noel Gallager. Lennon, Mccartney, Ozzy Osbourne or whatever. Just a bunch of big poofties. :). It's just so ridiculous it's funny. And that's where the entertainment is. I laugh my arse off. Yeah Noel Gallager, what a tough guy, recites poetry for a living !. 2 Reply 2 replies @hepaticapropria 3 months ago I’d say that thriller and smooth criminal are as hard as those 5 Reply 1 reply @hepaticapropria 3 months ago (edited) “This is it” movie is amazing ❤ 3 Reply @irurouni 3 months ago (edited) Goodness. Which of these dances did MJ NOT put in all from his body? So what's the diff from one song and dance to the other? 2 Reply @vilmathomas5158 3 months ago michael jackson was a genius ... a movement as you aptly described. he was a league of his own. 7 Reply @dcw56 3 months ago These five examples of "dancing" prove that MJ was a middlin dancer. Good singer, as far as that goes, though. Stop propping him up. People who like him will insist he is a good dancer. People who know a good dancer when they see one know better. He was average, with a lot of lights and some catchy songs. I liked him, but he is no Bill Robinson, that's for sure. 5 Reply @dcw56 3 months ago You have obviously never seen Fred Astair, OR BILL ROBINSON. Two of the true greats, and either could dance MJ into the ground that eventually swallowed him up. MJ was just another Be Bop club dancer who finally got his name in lights. Nothing more. Heck, Danny Kaye could dance him into the ground. You youtube "announcers" are so full of crap. The kind that comes out of the south end of a north bound cow. Yall suck, and all you want is money from the dead. SHAME! 4 Reply 3 replies @dcw56 3 months ago You ASS. MJ never got into his 50's. That implies he made it to over 50 years old. HE DID NOT. He OD'd when he was 50 years old. Suck butt. 3 Reply 2 replies @kimschannel5567 3 months ago Janet and Michael were not even in the same room when they worked on Scream, lol! 2 Reply @kimschannel5567 3 months ago People can copy the choreography but they will never capture his style and aura. 7 Reply 2 replies @kimschannel5567 3 months ago Jeffrey Daniel’s of Shalamar taught him how to moonwalk, but Michael took it to the next level with his own style. 1 Reply 2 replies @MissTBYEUSA 3 months ago Key word supernatural 3 Reply @carolcampbell9019 3 months ago As a former dancer I was always amazed at the dancers keeping up with him. Michael was a perfectionist and I give props 👏 to everyone in the performance 👏 All are works of art...never to be duplicated. 5 Reply 1 reply @ladierose1021 3 months ago “Bad “was a dynamic performance 2 Reply @genuinejojo 3 months ago it's not 1993, it's 1995, the live mtv performance from MJ. 2 Reply @jackson-e5b 3 months ago I thought for sure "smooth criminal "would be on here! 4 Reply @symbiotex83 3 months ago You guys on this Chat gpt are hallucinating or on drugs.....nobody can outdance Michael Jackson stop acting like bts or whomever can outdance Michael Jackson 5 Reply @pappaflammyboi5799 3 months ago Chat GPT video garbage. Barf! 4 Reply @pappaflammyboi5799 3 months ago MJ never made it into his 50s. He died aged 50. Now I have to question the rest of your claims. 7 Reply @babyspice0206 3 months ago Watch JK, the new MJ 😊❤❤❤ https://youtu.be/6q0JnftlH-I?si=1i_jaJZnN4qE68g4 1 Reply @LaurieAro 3 months ago Loved him, but never understood why he always grabbed his crotch. 4 Reply 1 reply @1tommyday 3 months ago Love him Hated the Co*k grabbing 7 Reply @darooh9815 3 months ago Chinese singer Tan Jianci seems to come close to Michael’s dancing. 1 Reply @Dreez76 3 months ago MJ was a workhorse and a perfectionist. 2 Reply @babyspice0206 3 months ago I think BTS can copy most of MJ's moves. They have already exceeded him. 3 Reply 4 replies @notv6548 3 months ago All except Bob Fosse! 1 Reply @cbjones2212 3 months ago 01:39 "...even in his 50's..." Ummm, he died when he was 50. Well, I guess he was "in his 50's " for almost 10 months. 6 Reply @josephinemiller68 3 months ago UGh! the AI narration is making me gag 5 Reply @ScrappyDoodad 3 months ago He wasn't all that hype! It wasn't him, it was the choreography, which was developed by someone else There are hundreds of YouTube videos of all kinds of people doing an excellent job of reproducing those steps 2 Reply 1 reply @tracycraft2971 3 months ago That man was an amazing performer and singer ! No one like him ever!!❤ 6 Reply @kkacz7783 3 months ago Signature move? You mean grabbing his crotch repeatedly? Like a toddler just learning potty training. I find it totally unnecessary and distracts from his superhuman abilities. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a fan otherwise. 5 Reply @RM-mm4jr 3 months ago A true genius. A legend. The world lost greatly. Gone far too soon. He'll never be forgotten. 😢 6 Reply @himmelsturmerIX 3 months ago deceptively difficult. so it's simple? 3 Reply @lindajohnson9282 3 months ago Ask Les Twins to do them 😉 2 Reply @mymuses4336 3 months ago THANK YOU FOR THIS, DEAR SIR! I JUST WITNESSED THE DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THE MAKING OF MJ'S MASTERPIECE, "THRILLER"...I have loved Michael ever since I was a little girl...singing with my cassette tape of, "BEN"...and then becoming the professional singer and musician that I am today at 58. Your breakdowns here are STELLAR! MUCH LOVE AND MAD RESPECT FROM NOLA BABY! ^..^⚜🎺🎷🥁🪘🪕🎻🎹🪗🎤🎭🥃🍺🦐🦞🦀🐊 3 Reply @MISAO_SAO 3 months ago He was gigging on Remember the Time. 4 Reply @maypnpl 3 months ago 💯 ❤❤❤❤❤ a good video 4 Reply @quintenjackson5447 3 months ago Chris Brown can 💯 😊 2 Reply 3 replies @REDtt 3 months ago I guess "impossible" has a different meaning to some people, smh. 3 Reply @গালৱ 3 months ago W narration👌 1 Reply @saleemahfareed4495 3 months ago Michael one of a kind rest in peace 💙🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 6 Reply @judycasemore2168 3 months ago No- one could ever beat M.J's Moves . That's why he is the King Of Pop. 10 Reply @patanthony5246 3 months ago The narration is some of the dumbest nonsense ive heard. 13 Reply @danieladany6465 3 months ago The only King of Pop🎉 7 Reply @Gigi-ww8ke 3 months ago Michael's brilliance cannot be replicated. However your statement that MJ even in his 50s was still in his prime is false. Michael died at age 50. 12 Reply @pittroadsixzeroseven 3 months ago Just gifted 5 Reply @kathy6166 3 months ago He is the king of pop forever 5 Reply @mary-anncarleton7578 3 months ago (edited) One of his geniuses, Micheal dialed in his brilliance. Koodos. Most guys at that age are one foot in the grave. 1 Reply @heatman233223 3 months ago MJ was 34 for the AMAs in 93. He wasn't 35 until August of that year 1 Reply @kevinleach7799 3 months ago If you have the nerve to call your channel MJ Forever at least get your facts straight. The "Dangerous" performance was in 1995 not 1993. and they were at the MTV VMA's, not the AMA The song was "Ghosts' not 2 Bad Ghosts. There was a song call 2 Bad, but it was a completely different song 4 Reply 1 reply @mariaoliveira922 3 months ago Amazing MJ forever 🙌🏼 3 Reply @remahunt4277 3 months ago He was a world class performer and top athlete. 4 Reply @annadiomis2675 3 months ago his dancing was like an alien, his singing was from another world, his song writing never heard songs before-he could even paint so well. he was the greatest artist of all time no human came close to his talent he has talents from the creator himself 7 Reply @VGB004 3 months ago You might need a part 2 just for "Smooth Criminal"... And 2 others 4 Reply @David-fanboy 3 months ago Wasn’t he 49 when he passed? 1 Reply 1 reply @angelaelisabethgunnarsson1041 3 months ago (edited) The videos I like most dangerous, jam, black or white and scary. In scary he dance very special. Ghosts. Reply @laurah.7696 3 months ago He died at 50. He was in his forties. 3 Reply @AsanKaliqAllah 3 months ago Smooth criminal 8 Reply @mariekrekora9958 3 months ago It’s only a dance that MJ can do 3 Reply @anthonyjean-jacques8510 3 months ago THE BEST.... Prove Me Wrong. 3 Reply 1 reply @davidtharp2125 3 months ago Chris Brown can. Reply @elizabethclaiborne6461 3 months ago Those aren’t his moves. He performed choreography by the greats. Jackson was a great dancer performing amazing repertoire, but no innovation. The originals are on YouTube and documented. Jackson doing an Astaire number is like Barishnykov doing a role. It’s fine. Just understand what it is. His innovations were musical. The fact that he was a master enough to do Astaire or Gene Kelly dances is an amazing accomplishment. 6 Reply @fififirestone3787 3 months ago If you watch the professional dancers, as talented as they are, they never look as good as Michael dancing. He had something special that was unique to him and it is still mesmerizing to watch. 13 Reply @antonnym214 3 months ago For me, it's Smooth Criminal. That lean gets me every time! 9 Reply @floridagoods 3 months ago (edited) Remember the time is my most favorite song and video from MJ!! My second is ghosts😅 6 Reply @bellesterbeatty3571 3 months ago Check out the Nickolas Brothers. 6 Reply @beyondbronzed 3 months ago They can all be copied because he had choreographers. Someone taught him some of his routines... 4 Reply @f_c_1958 3 months ago #MichaelJackson didn't have blood like you and me running in his vains... He had Music. 1 Reply @stephaniestanley8041 3 months ago SCREAM was phenomenal.😮 6 Reply @OliviaHacking-kf7px 3 months ago He was " removed " not only for his positive uplifting influence but his HIGH energy, something discouraged by the powers that be Reply @kevinvincal6075 3 months ago (edited) you're a good writer, but not accurate, or is the word realistic is what I'm looking for? 2 Reply @GandalfTheWhite03 3 months ago Some can copy him exactly. The choregraphy from ghosts was copied exactly several times. 4 Reply 5 replies @anujmane2005 3 months ago LES TWINS ENTERS THE CHAT Reply @KatherineCompton-c1x 3 months ago I think Thriller, should be here too. 3 Reply 1 reply @Doc_McStuffins 3 months ago One thing's for sure - the Jacksons have good knees. 😌 3 Reply @valhill7925 3 months ago Chimo Reply @peejayelvido4813 3 months ago Too Bad was insane weewww,he was just the best of the best 4 Reply @peejayelvido4813 3 months ago I watched an interview with one of the cheorgrapher of remember the time, she said they practiced for more than a week and then when Michael arrived,They have to change their movements,Because Michaels execution was totally different,it was fast 6 Reply @normanwatson9056 3 months ago MJ died at 50 not in his 50's dafty Reply 2 replies @charleslanphier8094 3 months ago Mute the pointless narration. 7 Reply 1 reply @antj3864 3 months ago Narration is whack. I'd prefer the video without the unknowledgable commentary. 6 Reply @dennisspirgen3800 3 months ago The narrator claims that Michael Jackson's dance routines are impossible to copy, as the video shows his backup dancers doing just exactly that. 7 Reply @vernansuccess 3 months ago It's quite obvious that this woefully uninformed narrator has never watched a single episode of Soul Train from the 70s nor has heard of the Nicholas Brothers. 5 Reply @daddyteddy85 3 months ago Clickbait 😢 4 Reply @shuyinkim2514 3 months ago Really miss him ❤ 6 Reply @andrewv.157 3 months ago Looks like 5 AI prompt results. Love MJ tho 2 Reply @anyany2021 3 months ago Impossible to copy? Except by ALL of the backup dancers with him you mean? Smh, idiot. 7 Reply 4 replies @SusieAiken 3 months ago ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Reply @sonianugent6429 3 months ago MJ knew you couldn't just hear the music and move. You had to feel it in bones and soul. 5 Reply @karmathephoenix2474 3 months ago It is possible to dance like MJ. Ballet dancers and break dancers could compete with Michael Jackson. Ozone and Turbo as well as the Les Twins from France could also compete with the superstar. The Remember the Time video dance routine would be a challenge for most people. I could see Michael suffering from bad knees, symptomatic flat feet, and plantar fasciitis if he had lived. 4 Reply 2 replies @lossforwords888 3 months ago Way too wordy narrator 1 Reply @lanalou77 3 months ago GOAT 1 Reply @summerbabetoo 3 months ago Michael had a grace that you can’t learn, your born with it. When ask Fred Astaire said that Michael was not only his favorite dancer but that Michael was a better dancer than he was. His interview on Michael is on you tube. Now that’s a compliment❣ MJ there will never be another like you 🥰 9 Reply 1 reply @quotesoflife4015 3 months ago Hey.. where are smooth criminal and thriller..?? 3 Reply 1 reply @grosskopf2779 3 months ago Love MJ and his dancing but to say that professional dancers struggled to keep up? Thats a bit much. Second who said Janet was one of the best dancers in the world? Huh? She's good but one of the best in the world? MJ was great entertainer and dancer but ahead of good professionals? 6 Reply 3 replies @florenciomendoza1212 3 months ago Everybody already knew MJ is the Best 4 Reply 1 reply @joelgarcia3907 3 months ago i don't think the moves are hard at all. People can do them but he adds nuance (naturally) that those simple moves just don't look right on another person. They moved two parts of their body or so but MJ moved his entire body. Fred Astaire was the same. It is what makes them look graceful. People are very stiff compared to MJ 3 Reply 3 replies @wapperjaw8282 3 months ago Ahh ... I see a whole bunch of Dancers in this video copying his moves ... 3 Reply 1 reply @cynthiagonzalez658 3 months ago What's with the crotch grab ⁉️ 3 Reply 2 replies @keshawestmoreland5535 3 months ago Ghost is such an ankle breaking dance routine. Like seriously, I was staring at his feet the whole time wondering how he was moving that way without breaking his ankles with the way his feet where bowing out. 5 Reply 1 reply @dh.inflameswetrust3419 3 months ago 𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝖔𝖓𝖑𝖞 𝖔𝖓𝖊. ❤ 2 Reply @marieaug9322 3 months ago Even without his music playing it looks fresh. All others look like they're having seizures 😮 Reply @pearlbeachwave 3 months ago He told Janet she was too fat. Reply 1 reply @BIGwillTHEGAME 3 months ago HEE HEE 1 Reply @Valientlink 3 months ago Am I the only one who kissed my laptop screen lmao... and I'm straight. I love this man, and the world would be a truly better place if he were still around. DAMN YOU MURRAY 4 Reply 1 reply @toutoune6717 3 months ago Le futur est peut-être asiatique comme m'a répondu quelqu'un mais on ne parle pas de genre musicale ici on parle de danseur et MJ est hors normes. Il n'a toujours pas été surclassé. C'est mon opinion 1 Reply @junes8796 3 months ago Great vid. Thank you. Reply @languagemitrasyedalveera8471 3 months ago Ghosts has always been my top favourite dance performance ! I literally had gaped open mouth watching it ! So so precise & smooth... ❤❤❤❤ 2 Reply 2 replies @ramaadazzlersallinone1728 3 months ago (edited) 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 He was a Great Dancer 💃 Reply @bl7817 3 months ago Please stop talking. Let people enjoy. I left in a minute! 7 Reply 1 reply @dixsonguzman8026 3 months ago A dance step can be taught. Genius and talent cannot be copied. 2 Reply 1 reply @zinchy360 3 months ago If mj was a footballer he could still be ahead of messi 4sure... Uganda 1 Reply @harrisonhanson2998 3 months ago Janet can mirror MJ’s dancing. It’s like they could’ve been the same person. 3 Reply @Barbiedoll-9 3 months ago Nobody will ever come close to equalling him … RIP Michael ❤️ 5 Reply @orange222... 3 months ago Remember the time was an amazing video but the dancing was at a much lower level. He uses standard moves (for him) and the background dancers are well choreographed but exceptional. Reminds of of paula abdul's video cold hearted snake where the dancers laugh when a judge says it's nice. Here it's nice. Maybe they wouldn't let him do any more because there were too many people involved because he sure didn't hesitate because of the dancing. Great video though. 2 Reply @LindaLandsverk 3 months ago Loved them all but I could do without the crotch grab. 13 Reply 6 replies @carlosbarahona8609 3 months ago Michael Jackson was a world class Dancer. No one can ever take that away from him. He is the ultimate artist. Vocals, Lyrics, Dancer,Poet, his choreography was second to none. Sheer pure Magic ❤ That Type of talent only comes maybe like once in a lifetime or a generation. Thank you for the wonderful artistic magic. Long Live Michael Jackson in our hearts and memories ❤ 10 Reply @eh477 3 months ago Is ONLY one ....Michael Jackson!!!! R.I.P. You Legend 8 Reply @DolphineAchonga-gn6kn 3 months ago (edited) He definitely set the bar high. I think a Chris Brown or a young Usher could pull them off. What they don't have is that demigod charisma, body fluidity and stage presence. His spontaneity was also on another level. 6 Reply 1 reply @ivonajakic6711 3 months ago MJ❤ 1 Reply @ThinkForYourself2025 3 months ago Dude... half the age of someone 35 isn't a man. You're in your prime as a man at 35, not 25. 2 Reply @user-mirk..... 3 months ago He is God 2 Reply @donnastapleton4155 3 months ago He's not that good 2 Reply 2 replies @stevenwilson5556 3 months ago HIs dancing is beyond legendary, but his songs were also incredible too. He was the full package. A singular genius who were did not deserve, but we were lucky to have him… for awhile. RIP Michael 8 Reply @flakeyjake4177 3 months ago Talented, yes. But what the heck was with all the crotch grabbing? I never understood it. 5 Reply 3 replies @The2guineapigs39 3 months ago Michael jackson is born to dance and sing 6 Reply @magdatorruellas9122 3 months ago A lot of people can copy his dance… hard…yes…impossible…no. 9 Reply 2 replies @Rowan2314 3 months ago Love you Michael.❤😮😢 5 Reply @Isabelin4 3 months ago Amo Scream, amé que Janet pudiera hacerlo, ella es la única que podía. 2 Reply @Maybei4 3 months ago There will never be another Michael Jackson. 31 Reply 4 replies @Dnn411 3 months ago He was a genus, king……and all will NEVER be superseded by his perverted sexual abuse on boys. 3 Reply 4 replies @MegaChen 3 months ago Don't be MJ, be yourself. 5 Reply @baniroka9206 3 months ago He was a Pedjo!! 🤮 Reply 1 reply @JorgTheElder 3 months ago (edited) Two words... Bob Fosse. He may have been the king of pop, but his core moves were 100% Fosse. 6 Reply @ujumaduoma3653 3 months ago I wonder how much more he had to pay his dancers. Exposure does not count as we could barely make out their faces. 2 Reply @gorvlivin 3 months ago (edited) I CANNOT COPY HIS RAPE boys NOR WOULD I EVER ON LITTLE boys. HE DID ON BOYS. PEDO 1 Reply 1 reply @railshot888 3 months ago The 2 Mikes, Michael Jackson and Michael Jordan I grew up watching them. Is still irreplaceable. They remain the peak of perfection within their realm. 6 Reply @wifeoftim 3 months ago He was an incredible dancer but so much seemed to be happening in his life. I will never understand why he changed his appearance . Reply 1 reply @nadavegan 3 months ago So let me get this straight...if you are off by even one step, you aren't in synch? Or is it that if you aren't in synch, you'll be off by at least one step? This is garbage analysis. Reply @vincentlee4016 3 months ago Not mention they had to sing while dancing 4 Reply @privateprivate9285 3 months ago Yes but, same old same in every routine. 1 Reply @samday414 3 months ago It doesn’t look like the backup dancers had any trouble keeping up. 5 Reply @UniPer85 3 months ago This is bullshit, all his dances are copied a million times already! There's nothing he did that nobody on this planet can't copy. However, it's not about being able to copy his dances, it's the talent to come up with this style of dance and make other people believe in it as well. Besides that MJ was a perfectionist and was able to instruct and coach all the dancers on the stage with him. He's a born talent. But impossible to copy...no? Nobody is.. 4 Reply @BigBossBr4z1l 3 months ago I was prepared to comment that was a good list but i would add Ghosts...and then suddenly it was #1. I'm glad you didn't disappoint me haha That's why i don't like and don't respect MJ " professional imitators (impersonators, whatever)". It's not just about (trying

The Backstory of Nolan's New Film "Oppenheimer"!

The Backstory of Nolan's New Film "Oppenheimer"! Yelvlv 17.4K subscribers Join Subscribe 102 Share Download Thanks Clip 8,798 views Jul 19, 2023 In this issue of the film, I will give a detailed introduction to Oppenheimer's life, the beginning and end of the Manhattan Project, and related historical facts, so that we can better appreciate this film. Chapters View all Transcript Follow along using the transcript. Show transcript Yelvlv 17.4K subscribers Videos About X Yelvlv 17.4K subscribers 14 Comments rongmaw lin Add a comment... @jacquelinelam3022 1 year ago 电影演員和原型很像, 最难得是兩人的藍眼睛. 4 Reply 耶律律 · 1 reply @张错-o5h 1 year ago 大陆宣布定档“电影天堂”😅 3 Reply 耶律律 · 1 reply @wensen-mz2ji 1 year ago 靠杯，把WIKI上的內容直接抓下來，用加點圖片的PPT直接當影片? 1 Reply 耶律律 · 1 reply @李长清-q4h 1 year ago 但苏联核武之路还真靠亲共的科学家帮忙。 1 Reply 耶律律 · 1 reply @graceliu2475 1 year ago “crying baby” , not “狗娘养的”，素质！素质！ Reply 耶律律 · 1 reply @carryout6971 1 year ago 好頻道ok呀，但總是愛搞那種 都還沒看 就叫第一次來的人先訂閱 這樣很low Reply 耶律律 · 1 reply