Thursday, May 08, 2025
他僅靠這一首詩名揚大唐，末尾兩句創造了一個成語，妳絕對聽過！【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
他僅靠這一首詩名揚大唐，末尾兩句創造了一個成語，妳絕對聽過！【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
縱觀史書
views
May 8, 2025
更多精彩內容，請點擊下方清單查看：
• 曆史人物
• 曆史知識
頻道往期精彩視頻：
• 明朝「最懶」對聯：上聯和下聯一字不差，卻成千古名對流傳至今【縱觀史書】#歷...
• 康熙的女兒端靜公主被丈夫踢死，康熙得知後，是怎樣為她復仇的？【縱觀史書】#...
• 李世民放了390名死囚回家過年，約定年後再斬，最終回來多少人？【縱觀史書】...
• 寡婦出上聯：「野花不種年年有」，秀才對出下聯，抱得美人歸【縱觀史書】#歷史...
• 蘇軾納了十二歲的小妾，初見時寫下千古名句，成為後世男人的花言巧語【縱觀史書...
• 蘇軾見到友人妻子漂亮，羨慕之余為其寫下一首詞，感動世人近千年【縱觀史書】#...
• 書生嫌妻年老色衰，出上聯：「荷敗蓮殘，落葉歸根成老藕」，妻子下聯成絕世經典...
• 秀才出上聯：「呂府姑娘，下口大過上口」，下聯更絕，諷刺意味十足【縱觀史書】...
• 蘇軾的小妹出上聯：「人曾是僧，人弗能成佛」，和尚的下聯卻讓她氣憤不已【縱觀...
• 1997年，浙江古廟發現梁山伯墓，墓碑保存完好，揭開梁祝化蝶真相【縱觀史書...
#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#歷史萬花鏡#奇聞#歷史風雲天下
縱觀史書
18.2K subscribers
Videos
About
縱觀史書
林徽因寫給徐志摩的兩首詩，字字唯美，句句入心，開頭就驚豔了！
林徽因寫給徐志摩的兩首詩，字字唯美，句句入心，開頭就驚豔了！
suwei Read aloud
57.9K subscribers
Subscribe
3K
Share
Download
Thanks
Clip
271,450 views Sep 2, 2022
大家好！歡迎收聽蘇衛朗讀。蘇衛朗讀每天為您朗誦古今中外經典散文、詩詞、詩歌。分享古今中外名家及優秀作者的作品，期待和您在文學知識海洋中共同成長。
林徽因和徐志摩的情和愛，是經久不衰的話題，每每讀起他們的詩，縂會讓人浮想聯翩，廻味無窮，令千萬少男少女爲之陶醉，今天就分享林徽因的兩首寫給徐志摩的詩，一首是拒絕，一首是追憶，字裡行間的愛恨情仇，自己去躰會吧！
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
近期作品分享：
蘇東坡這首詞被古人刻在石碑上傳遍海內，還誕生一個成語，遇事不順時讀一讀不錯！ • 蘇東坡這首詞被古人刻在石碑上傳遍海內，還誕生一個成語，遇事不順時讀一讀不錯！
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
經典散文｜《男人的教養》作者陳道明，好男人的標準你達到幾條？： • 陳道明散文《男人的教養》好男人的標準你達到幾條？
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
曹操《短歌行》為何千年流傳？細細品讀你就明白了！不服不行： • 曹操《短歌行》為何千年流傳？細細品讀你就明白了！不服不行
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
千古絕唱《長恨歌》白居易代表作，橫掃大唐詩壇，請聽朗誦： • 《長恨歌》白居易代表作，橫掃大唐詩壇，請聽朗誦
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
唐詩解讀《長幹行》作者：崔顥，少男少女的心思全猜到！ • 唐詩《長干行》作者：崔顥，少男少女的心思全猜到！
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
解讀千古名篇《赤壁賦》，人如蜉蝣般渺小，悟透的沒幾個人： • 《赤壁賦》人如蜉蝣般渺小，悟透的沒幾個人
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
蘇東坡《赤壁賦》經典古詩詞朗誦，餘音繞樑，人生哲理： • 蘇東坡《赤壁賦》經典古詩詞朗誦，余音繞梁，人生哲理
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
莫言經典散文｜《拾饅頭的父親》，一句話助你克服自卑，值得一讀： • 莫言經典散文｜《拾饅頭的父親》，一句話助你克服自卑，值得一讀
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
suwei Read aloud
57.9K subscribers
Videos
About
3:45
磁性朗誦｜徐志摩《再別康橋》寫的是林徽因嗎？太美了！
by suwei Read aloud
351 Comments
rongmaw lin
Add a comment...
@李先生-s2p
2 years ago
被風吹雨打到處飄零的並非落葉，是那凋零的心！
43
Reply
@mtt8225
5 months ago
真美，
如人一样。
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@蒋品超歌曲频道
1 year ago
极好的朗诵与分享，钦佩！禁不住贴一个长短句😄
《想起徐志摩》
长长短短的字句间
一个生命
放映着自己的悲欢与寂寞
嘘唏吟哦的言辞里
那个世界
流动着你们的纯粹，真诚与执着
混沌初开
雄武是一种壮阔
人寰惨烈
天地有如一条翻江的大河
所有的空间都敞开了
让你们这些激进的歌者
放唱着自己的高歌
成为了这世间
永世永生的传说
物质的枪弹是物质的归宿
精神的咏者有精神的着落
英雄
在不同的天空中
显示着不同的磅礴
豪烈的大幕下
是你们彼此的长风
飞掠
精灵相约
竞燃着自己的生命之火
多美
我也是一个激进的歌者
也有着自己一段长长的诗河
而在这紧闭的空中
在这沉闷的大漠
物质和精神
都已被那些残忍的元素封锁
心智和体魄
在这遥远的荒凉里放逐
纵然激情炙灼
纵然热血喷薄
有谁愿懂
我也如你
曾为这个世界
预备过一段清丽的柔波
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@方小萍-w5v
2 years ago
詩人的浪漫，讓人難以苛求他
23
Reply
2 replies
@myca94087
1 year ago
寫得真好，一聽就能睡著。
5
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@树杰王-v1j
10 months ago
真正的爱结果都是凄美且感伤
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@fujundong4751
2 years ago
凄美。感动。谢谢分享！
11
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@挽僧
2 years ago
真實、感動….
20
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@賢柱楊
1 year ago (edited)
我個人覺得這兩首詩寫的還真美！說這些話的前提，我曾看過許多古今中外的名詩。創世紀詩刊三大巨頭，張默、瘂弦、洛夫。張默曾說：詩沒有古詩、新詩、現代詩之分，也沒有西洋詩與中國詩之分，只有好詩與壞詩之別，我認同這句話。
25
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@蔡麗卿-x1b
2 years ago
感嘆 愛情偉大的力量 可叫醒沈醉在愛的人們
9
Reply
@逸宇微宏逸宇微宏
2 years ago
美，收不尽！
12
Reply
@darimalau9828
1 year ago
令人盪氣迴腸。
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@stevexu4346
2 years ago
感觉真好！谢谢您的付出！㊗️您好运！🙏🍎🍵🌹
9
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@yumin2855
1 year ago
感謝影片!
新詩.現代詩，沒什麼格律限制，重於情感表達方式。
每個人都是好詩人
，有人喜歡文字簡練，有人喜歡意猶未盡。只要不是露骨低俗，應該多能雅俗共賞，應該多是好詩。
詩解意境，不是要出詩集，文字適度表達即可。
歡迎有興趣的詩友
，加入國際情緣相關詩社，一起來練習寫詩。
祝 詩魂永存!
11
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@chienhsingtsao7668
1 year ago
這聲腺破壞了美好
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@thl3552
1 year ago
你的配樂用的是台語交響樂曲舊情綿綿，真好！
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@kakakok-y6m
1 year ago
這只能說是現代的中文作文。其遠遠不及唐詩的押韻來的深度演繹。
30
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
6 replies
@wangjuan1489
2 years ago
多情善感，郁郁寡欢！纵然才华横溢，终究抱恨短寿。
12
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@EdwardYuen-f4g
10 months ago
醉愛林徽因
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@anniehyde571
1 year ago (edited)
有这两首诗徐志摩这一辈子也值了。这种柏拉图式的两情相悦也只有深爱着对方的林徐二人去拥有。最难的是梁思成，谦谦君子的他要包容和接纳一个没有完全属于自己的妻子。
29
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@BalanceChen87
1 year ago
感谢博主深情动人的朗诵，博主对各色评论所展现的雅量也令人钦佩。
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@adamli1830
1 year ago
展眼吊斜晖，湘江水逝楚云飞。人生就像手里的沙，曾经的心动，激情和一切，到最后都把握不住，终将逝去。
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@vklee8935
1 year ago
还是喜欢古诗
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@bosgarden3646
2 years ago
”情愿“有些悲苦，无奈
11
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@浪花開
11 months ago
迴 別丟掉 那一份真 深深迴盪心坎底 牢不可抓的情意 猶如思念般的絕情 不覆眼前
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@dali5468
2 years ago
鴛鴦蝴蝶夢。
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@朱秀莲-x4z
2 years ago
👍👍👏
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@yujiang5313
2 years ago
與其說是詩，倒不如說是散文吧。
21
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@tujgh1361
2 years ago
這就是民國初年新詩的風格，林和徐那段感情只能用四個字形容(欲語還休)。
46
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
4 replies
@changchao5797
1 year ago
道家的空、巨細靡遺
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@weiping2248
1 year ago
看来这两位真的是 相爱过。 但是爱归爱， 不适合在一起过日子。 林是明智的。
43
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
4 replies
@GoldLinus
2 years ago
林的新詩是寫得非常好的.
十六年年華一片葉, 風從枝間過, 已是往年.
那只風箏我留著, 縱使那被辜負了的線.
你是指間流過了的汪洋
其實你只是蓋著了淚, 落入沙土, 的溫潤, 的孤子.
從今你得別過了你的夜海
別過了你的螢火
別過了你的秋冬
往年的葉已經不再是十六
正如往年的風
早別過了你的深谷.
25
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
5 replies
@karenchan4721
1 year ago
一個有才華的禍水
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
4 replies
@ShaingShiowFu
1 year ago
(爱情）多少罪恶假你之名而行。
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@Lilyhuang6666
1 year ago
迴音是指「我愛你」嗎？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@syu67890
3 months ago
读起来真的那么顺畅吗？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@albertwgjjiang7730
1 year ago
这也叫诗,韵律在哪？
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@feliciahong3086
1 year ago
人一生中要遇到一個心靈、才華、興趣都契合的人，是多麼多麼 不 容易！
我深深覺得林和徐就是一對 「靈魂伴侶」，相知相惜，已經超乎世俗單純的男女情愛了。
我倒是敬佩他們倆這一段情誼~ 曠世之戀！💕 純潔又不逾矩！畢竟梁思成和徐志摩、林徽因本是摯友，梁欣賞徐、也沒拒絕林和徐有來往。 多不可思議的三人組啊！ 😆
8
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@PretenderSept
11 months ago (edited)
活到了知命年方覺曉，但凡不能同床共枕的 不經柴米油鹽的，都不是真愛！
20
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@TheHelen2002
2 years ago
「情願」這樣的詩怎能不讓徐繼續努力追求下去⋯
17
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@包姆凱蘿
2 months ago
[別丟掉]最後兩字的"迴音" 就是"徽因"
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@栗小豆
10 months ago
、兩人從在英倫時就曖昧不清的情愫直至婚後仍如此、佩服民初的女子、走出封建和小腳、放眼世界、 居然比現下的人還大胆~❤❤🎉
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@阿原伯
2 months ago
讀了詩經 、聖賢經典、漢賦 、唐詩、 宋詞、 金庸小說,再看這些所謂的現代詩，就覺得很搞笑！
筆墨影響深遠，寫這種私情小愛的內容，到審判日時，就會懊悔自己的愚痴！
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@bzscck4496
1 year ago
写诗要意境和环境，而且是一种情感像心理的溪水要冒出来不写出来就要溜掉。自己都感到可惜，年轻人想象自己体魄强壮，激情万丈像参天的大树扎根寻找营养，长出绿叶争艳开花，结果延续后代；老年人的怨恨和遗憾是心不从力，微弱，渺茫的猜疑向生命的尽头盼望和祈祷，有什么写什么，抓住圣灵是上帝的恩典，溜走的是忘却的痛苦，追求的是人权和自由，离上帝近了，坦然走向死亡灵魂长存。
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@簡美娥
1 year ago
這人世間得不到的總是最好最美、徐志摩和陸小曼結了婚之後、他幸福嗎快樂嗎未必、人世間多這樣從古到今這樣的事多在從演。
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@proialee
1 year ago
『情願』 不能歸類為詩，不符合現代詩的音韻和精鍊的美感。只是個型句工整的抒情小散文。
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@DrRKOng
2 years ago
山谷。
Reply
@nancyzhang7293
2 years ago
爱情是一种情绪，超越道德，年龄，种族。婚姻是契约。前者不可强求，无法买卖，后者需经营。林与徐懂对方，徐更彻底去追求爱情，林相反做不到豁出去。
23
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@cad6918
2 years ago
喜欢林徽茵有独立的思想和道德底线。她沒有上徐志摩的贼船。徐是个著名的花花公子，很难想象他把林搞到手后，会真正爱她一辈子吗？
69
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
6 replies
@yuenpinglam1987
1 year ago
林小姐放弃除，是明智抉擇
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@simmylai6112
2 years ago
徐的催情毒藥
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@dyang8923
1 year ago
不知梁公子作何感想？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@zhensuzeng8947
10 months ago
诗里用很多徐志摩飞机坠落的场景来表达真切悼念，绝啦。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@bibili888
1 year ago
小编， 太先入为主了， 开头的那几个字， 怎么就惊艳了？ 小编太不客观
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@anna72572
1 year ago
他她們之間 是淒美苦戀相遇故事!😢😰
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@henryfun12
11 months ago (edited)
姑且不谈（该诗）的文学价值！若某才子，看见某佳人这样一首欲说还休地，看似“绝情”却饱有“浓情”的“诗”，用现代话来讲，大意（我的“新诗”😄）是这样的：新诗名叫：落叶对大地的思念
我是一片飘零的落叶，
随风而流浪天际
很可怜的。
你我虽有情谊，
但是我身不由己，
不管怎样，希望你记起
我曾在你上面活过！
拒绝你不是我的本意，
希望你能明白我的心底！
很难想象“才子”会因此诗而决绝离开，因为字里行间流淌着浓浓的情欲之水！相反，可能会思念一生啊！苦不堪言！
这到底是一首“绝情”诗呢？还是一首“丝连”诗呢？
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@jinmingwang5048
2 years ago
即便是拒绝，也是用裸体的方式拒绝。虽然跟他的灵魂对话，不如说跟自己的内心对话。
8
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@栗小豆
2 years ago
这是新詩
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@ceci6380
1 year ago
不愛就別回頭，拖泥帶水又拉着花花公子想不通。有夫有子还想继續恋情，不負責任。想她对家庭与夫君也没全情投入。用情不專，放縱感情。西方思热如Little women.Pride n prejudice.都不會如此做女人同時愛幾人，不道德也不值得尊崇。
7
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
4 replies
@75fourth
2 years ago
我只想说，那个似的念si de ，平舌音
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@-solarlightsarah7905
1 year ago
好奇一下，徐志摩对陆小曼挺好，供她奢靡的生活。那么，林徽因和他谈情时，又收过礼物吗？后来又还过吗？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@laisheunglo4421
1 year ago
我年輕時也著迷過新詩，現在沒興趣了.還想知道林有否寫詩給梁思誠
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@mimij8939
9 months ago (edited)
男女之愛大多就是情慾、人之常情、沒那麼崇高
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@吳秀煌-i3r
1 year ago
唉！我オ貌雙全，只是相逢太晚。
還君明珠雙淚垂，恨不相逢未嫁時，我待嫁中，只是我的訣擇不是你！
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@淑鈴張-u8h
1 year ago
似乎三位女伴中，應是這位是知音吧！
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@瑞珍黃-p2u
2 years ago
害！老公無奈又如何，早知如此，何必當初，愛是恆久唯一
5
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@suiyauli8552
1 year ago (edited)
是詩嗎？怎看就是文章，別丟掉才象現代詩
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@种菜岚山下
6 months ago
好诗，但男性老者的嗓音却出不来20多岁青春美丽女性的心底诗意。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@mingshengliu4661
1 year ago
快一百年前的风流文人的韵事，值得翻来覆去的传颂嘛？！
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@yijia5142
1 year ago
似有两种读音如下:
1. si4(音4)，相似(舌尖前音4)
2. shi4(音是)，似在"的"前要读"是"音(舌尖后音，舌团音)，不读si4(4)。
故朗诵发音无误。
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@Mary.L-cj4ej
10 months ago
她倒底是誰的老婆？三心兩意的女人，美？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@yinshanfeng1269
2 years ago
找女人唸，你唸太聒噪
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@syang1116
11 months ago
林老師沒有活到她設計的共和國國徽走到啥地步
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@waiwong6613
2 years ago
躡應該讀第四聲
1
Reply
@joycelin777
2 years ago
第一首，可適用有失智症的家人。
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@bosgarden3646
2 years ago
我是个无可救药的乐观主义者，更喜欢她的“旅途中”😄
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@jerrylin3715
2 years ago
看不太懂，水平不够？
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
4 replies
@frizzyfroggy-f4b
1 year ago
徽因女先輩給足他面子。徐志摩就要陸小曼這種人物測試 ‘愛情’ 定義，他很幸運，這會增加他品性的深度，可惜死早。扯上徐，會想、反求諸己的張子儀及徽因絕對是容忍、折騰過日，因為成了 ‘’親情糾結纏‘’，就像徐對陸這檔戲。王賡終身未娶，保持低調，也是一種人格。愛情需要財務自由。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@michaelj6448
2 years ago
捧過了頭，基本就是民國的白話，只有限意境，還因漏字所以表達不夠完整⋯⋯
12
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@kwantaikam3423
1 year ago
除志磨为情死为情亡～为情死了又何必了
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@Lilyhuang6666
1 year ago
正如徐志摩有一首詩末句
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@kaisangsum4291
2 years ago
兩詩都有再別康橋的味道，些文的作者又把山谷的谷字寫錯為山穀。正如大陸啲人把皇后寫成皇後，又係殘體字把正體字弄錯了。幾十年的殘體字教育的成果就是如此。
9
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@benjaminpineda1765
1 year ago
山谷。別字連篇。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@charliedeng5238
1 year ago
有丈夫的人写这样的诗也算精神出轨吧 ！
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@taklai8965
2 years ago
這也可稱為詩？只能說是詞吧！
9
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
7 replies
@li-mingwei7737
5 months ago (edited)
我一點都不覺得林徽因的這兩首現代詩有什麼好的，詩從頭到尾的感情都沒有輕重之別與緩急之分，就好比一幅畫的色調沒有深淺與距離沒有遠近的不同一般。看完的感覺，有如一堆難以消化的東西硬塞進肚裡，然後撐著消化不良的感覺！不是因為林徽因的詩沒有華麗的文藻，李白很多特別傑出的唐詩的文句卻反而是用很簡單的文字平鋪直敘。林徽因的詩從頭到尾，就想把感情寫得很濃很烈的態勢，完全沒有襯托或烘托的手法，而其實有時最濃的情，是用最輕的話來說的！這兩首詩的水準真的很一般，香港很多中學生都可以寫得更好很多！對林徽因這兩首詩的高度讚賞，就好像張忠謀的太太張淑芬的畫在拍賣場會比楊恩生的畫值錢非常多一樣的荒謬！
那些讚賞與值錢，都是因為名人或是商業利益罷了，與文學及藝術都無關！
若要真正客觀的來評價：林徽因既然是寫給徐志摩的，那就拿徐志摩的詩來比一比，就會清楚的看到文豪與普通的差別了。
或許林徽因在建築上有才華，或許那個年代的女性少有受到高等教育的，所以就將能寫些東西的林徽因捧上了天！以現代很多女性都受到高等教育的情況來比，林徽因的文采真的很一般。我看過一個中文很有天賦的女孩，她小學二年級寫的中文文章，老實說，在我個人的看法，其實都比林徽因的這兩首詩好很多！
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@丕黃
1 year ago
背景音樂很有意思
但旁白者，不以為然
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@-solarlightsarah7905
1 year ago
我文学修养不够。第一首诗我只注意到最后一句话，你就当我没有在这个世间活过，写的这么吓人，我要收到这样的信，不飞去看看人是不是寻死才有鬼？哪里是诀别了？第二首更get不到它的点在哪？不像分倒像鼓励说你千万要像以前那样爱我要爱的热烈真诚。一个女的写这样的句子，美在哪？联想他们的关系，更感觉不到美了。这就是吊二凯子而已吧？😅
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@Noa878
2 years ago
為什麼要唸出這種聲音？像是發生重大天災人禍！
6
Reply
@vl1114
2 years ago
这林徽因写诗的水平就是个文学女青年。。。都无法让人感到震动。。。
20
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@陳明典-u1g
1 year ago
任何女詩人的詩詞讓你唸起來，都不美了！找個女人來唸吧！
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@laikiugarland1082
2 years ago
不懂欣賞 只記得她問老公我愛上金xx 怎辦?很美也坦白! 男人搶呀!!
3
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@ming100cheung9
1 year ago
用女声讀才好
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@pohlan01soo39
1 year ago
结局都是落雪飞霜。对现实無意義。合法伤害無辜。,(老師在班上這样骂的)
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@曾幼芬
7 months ago
我主修中文，覺得這些文章，很普通的男女關係。
沒什麼特別。
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@bonnieyu8968
2 years ago
不是拒絕，而是想要但是他的家世高攀不起而且還有拋妻棄子臭名，她就算真正的愛他也要放棄。
7
Reply
1 reply
@williamxu5874
2 years ago
文字也就一般吧，离诗的文字还差很远。
如果他不是诗人，如果她不是名人，这两篇普通文字也不可能被人赞美。
9
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@xiujhenwang1406
1 year ago
这也算诗？
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@錢慧敏
2 years ago
我只要一想到林徽因最後在病榻上還要把張幼儀叫過去，就證明她很清楚自己是造成張幼儀悲劇的源頭，卻一生都堅持自己清白無辜。
愛上徐本身不是錯，既然選擇拒絕就該斷得徹底，寫那麼美的詩句給徐是拒絕嗎？是吊他一輩子吧！
不管此人有多少才華和貢獻，感情上她就是標準的白蓮花！
18
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@MichelleLau-bf3gq
1 year ago
比較喜歡 笫二首，清新 意境高⋯
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@HatuBao
1 year ago
完全是朗读，根本没有情感在诗里，那么情感丰富的诗句让朗读者全毁了。
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@18不語
2 years ago
標誌
Reply
@yunhuang2175
2 years ago
很一般
5
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@baba_baba
2 years ago
抱歉，不覺得有多美。
7
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@firstsir4333
1 year ago
梁思成比徐志摩你有钱有势 建筑学大家 爱情也有物质做基础 自古不变！
1
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@WaterKoon
1 year ago
這些耶穌幫youtuber只會歌頌俊男美女，對於才華努力暟之於鼻。林徽因和相貌普通的梁思成婚姻不墮，耶穌幫當然又氣又惱。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@munhowong2646
1 year ago
用白話朗誦？怎麽用國語朗誦😂？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@Papa-s1c
11 months ago
渣男乱情！
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@wenwenchen5430
2 years ago
小三就是小三，不要用詩詞美化。也無法美化。
4
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@villafanefelix8038
1 year ago
看来徐志摩和陆小曼的婚姻也不适合哈
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@momoita888
1 year ago
看徐志摩悼念他小兒子的文章才是真的噁心
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@XiShuoWang
11 months ago
都一般般
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@xiaozhouyi5092
1 year ago
什么破玩意儿
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@johncunningham3499
1 year ago
我绝对没有亵渎才女，仙女的意思， 可我实在品不出这些诗句是怎样的好？无韵无律。除了堆砌一些具有象征性的字句， 好在哪里呢？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
2 replies
@蘇孟禮
2 years ago
徐再出名也是犯了拋妻生子不顧的渣男吧？去當他自私的火山孝子吧！
6
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
3 replies
@josephguo6256
2 years ago
新诗不是诗，知冇？唐诗才是诗，知冇？
5
Reply
@tpl7741
11 months ago (edited)
我看到只是一個享受追求及被愛的女子而已。有夫之婦，不去避嫌，還要去招惹別人的男人，真不知所謂。個人覺得新詩只是斷句的白話文，亳無美感。不要跟紅頂白了！ 誰去關心張幼儀 ？
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@november9700
2 years ago
太噁了！渣男渣女！🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
3
Reply
@sodium2470
1 year ago
绿茶鼻祖之一！
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@江秋菊-r3p
2 years ago
因為沒有爽幹到 才有苦戀說法
= 齷齪事沒做成 另一妖姬說心聲
真的沒爽幹到嗎 ? 我不信
5
Reply
@bertzhang1509
1 year ago
能夠為井岡山蝥賊盡心盡力策劃“人民英雄紀念碑”，她也不過是個專制爬蟲罷了。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@melz9664
11 months ago
现代诗就是把一个句子断成几截而已。 哪里有古诗中每个字的丰富寓意和韵律的和谐。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@RoyCn-kz9nj
11 months ago
只是可怜了她的后人。当人们热衷于谈论风流才子和佳人的浪漫爱情时，谁考虑过她后人的感受。人间四月天明明是她写给自己儿子的，却被人们津津乐道为写给徐才子的情诗，还拍了电视剧，各种丰富的戏说。
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@彭健忠-c3i
10 months ago
出軌變奏曲
厚顏無恥
有夫之婦，不顧譏嫌
送有婦夫，淫戀穢詞
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@dakexiaowang56
1 year ago
人话而已 倒也真切 不知后人中的那些骚客痴迷林徽因什么 ？？？诗之于我。。。。真话 无所谓悲 喜 发自内心的感受说出来 写下来的 ，，就是。。 都是 如果说由于她有什么特别 只有新潮这一样 比青楼女子稍好些 自由些 更像个人。。。罢了
2
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@medicinecontestshow2651
3 months ago
不行 沒品味
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
@MmNn-g2q
1 year ago
老共跌跌不休无一成功哈哈哈老共买啥跌啥
Reply
蘇衛朗讀
·
1 reply
乾隆出上聯「一日為日，二日為昌，三日為晶」，紀曉嵐下聯絕妙，還拍了皇帝馬屁【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
乾隆出上聯「一日為日，二日為昌，三日為晶」，紀曉嵐下聯絕妙，還拍了皇帝馬屁【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
縱觀史書
1
55,892 views Mar 19, 2025
更多精彩內容，請點擊下方清單查看：
• 曆史人物
• 曆史知識
頻道往期精彩視頻：
• 明朝「最懶」對聯：上聯和下聯一字不差，卻成千古名對流傳至今【縱觀史書】#歷...
• 康熙的女兒端靜公主被丈夫踢死，康熙得知後，是怎樣為她復仇的？【縱觀史書】#...
• 李世民放了390名死囚回家過年，約定年後再斬，最終回來多少人？【縱觀史書】...
• 寡婦出上聯：「野花不種年年有」，秀才對出下聯，抱得美人歸【縱觀史書】#歷史...
• 蘇軾納了十二歲的小妾，初見時寫下千古名句，成為後世男人的花言巧語【縱觀史書...
• 蘇軾見到友人妻子漂亮，羨慕之余為其寫下一首詞，感動世人近千年【縱觀史書】#...
• 書生嫌妻年老色衰，出上聯：「荷敗蓮殘，落葉歸根成老藕」，妻子下聯成絕世經典...
• 秀才出上聯：「呂府姑娘，下口大過上口」，下聯更絕，諷刺意味十足【縱觀史書】...
• 蘇軾的小妹出上聯：「人曾是僧，人弗能成佛」，和尚的下聯卻讓她氣憤不已【縱觀...
• 1997年，浙江古廟發現梁山伯墓，墓碑保存完好，揭開梁祝化蝶真相【縱觀史書...
#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#歷史萬花鏡#奇聞#歷史風雲天下
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
Videos
About
縱觀史書
24 Comments
rongmaw lin
Add a comment...
@tlptlp-o7w
1 month ago (edited)
重複為字是不可以的，可改為單木是木倆木是林參木是森。共勉之。
8
Reply
@markrainsky-v6l
1 month ago
人，从，众
2
Reply
@jianyaolee8352
1 month ago
一木為木，二木為林，三木為森
Reply
@rt552
1 month ago
直接到 12:12 啦,其餘拉扯
1
Reply
@無言啊
1 month ago (edited)
稀土為土,堆土為圭,積土為垚.
Reply
@mkyuen8349
1 month ago
眾官不是對不了，是怕太快對好，壞了皇上雅興，拉去殺頭。
2
Reply
@KeyESG
1 month ago
五行對五色，青紅黃白黑，扣掉四色就是青，加上犬字旁也不是獸。😊
1
Reply
@swansonpeng342
1 month ago
垃圾視頻，沒營養的內容也能做到16分鐘
7
Reply
@honeylin6216
1 month ago
单，俩，叁，难道不是一，二，三吗？
3
Reply
@gawin0214
1 month ago
別浪費時間了，單為木，倆為林，參為森
8
Reply
@giam1668
1 month ago
🙏 見賢思齊，時不于我😂
1
Reply
@許輝亮-y4x
1 month ago
矮油^ ^ 原來我也很行嘛^ ^ 看到上聯我立馬(沒看到最後) 就對了和紀曉嵐一樣的。 讓我爽歪忘形了
3
Reply
@wynerforsure4692
1 month ago
三和叁有啥不同？
1
Reply
@pingkwongchan1955
1 month ago
有關乾隆的故事，坊間收集不少其平生事蹟。其中一則也是楹聯的事。其聯頭曾被編劇狀元唐條生於五十多年前入曲《牡丹亭驚夢》其中一句。約兩、三年前，也有人拿此聯頭在視頻中說事，據云連甚具才氣的紀曉嵐也無法對上。在民國期間，有人重提此聯頭，並向全國徵求聯尾，結果也是無人能對上。但有一聯尾「燈深村寺鐘」是被認為對得最好的，甚為工整，且有意境。可惜其「寺」字的部首土字在上方而不是在左旁，被認為無法對上，算是美中不足。乾隆的上聯是「煙鎖池塘柳」，左旁分別有「金木水火土」五行。怪不得連紀曉嵐也無法對上。
4
Reply
@kenhoo3702
1 month ago
2 日 哪里是 昌 。昌 是 1日1曰
Reply
@PeterTurner-q6l
1 month ago
這片中是在看漢皇還是清代的？
Reply
@星海之戀-t9t
1 month ago
一堆廢話
2
Reply
@rayliang56
1 month ago (edited)
1□为口，2口为多(呂回)，3口为品？
1
Reply
@劉芳育
1 month ago
廢話太多了
3
Reply
@wllee072458
1 month ago
火，炎，焱＼
1
Reply
@Lin-ChuChung
1 month ago
火、炎、焱，
Reply
Wednesday, May 07, 2025
孟浩然爲了找工作，給宰相寫了一封求職信，卻讓人誤以爲是山水詩【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
孟浩然爲了找工作，給宰相寫了一封求職信，卻讓人誤以爲是山水詩【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
views
May 7, 2025
更多精彩內容，請點擊下方清單查看：
• 曆史人物
• 曆史知識
頻道往期精彩視頻：
• 明朝「最懶」對聯：上聯和下聯一字不差，卻成千古名對流傳至今【縱觀史書】#歷...
• 康熙的女兒端靜公主被丈夫踢死，康熙得知後，是怎樣為她復仇的？【縱觀史書】#...
• 李世民放了390名死囚回家過年，約定年後再斬，最終回來多少人？【縱觀史書】...
• 寡婦出上聯：「野花不種年年有」，秀才對出下聯，抱得美人歸【縱觀史書】#歷史...
• 蘇軾納了十二歲的小妾，初見時寫下千古名句，成為後世男人的花言巧語【縱觀史書...
• 蘇軾見到友人妻子漂亮，羨慕之余為其寫下一首詞，感動世人近千年【縱觀史書】#...
• 書生嫌妻年老色衰，出上聯：「荷敗蓮殘，落葉歸根成老藕」，妻子下聯成絕世經典...
• 秀才出上聯：「呂府姑娘，下口大過上口」，下聯更絕，諷刺意味十足【縱觀史書】...
• 蘇軾的小妹出上聯：「人曾是僧，人弗能成佛」，和尚的下聯卻讓她氣憤不已【縱觀...
• 1997年，浙江古廟發現梁山伯墓，墓碑保存完好，揭開梁祝化蝶真相【縱觀史書...
#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#歷史萬花鏡#奇聞#歷史風雲天下
縱觀史書
古人也很開放，一首“花間詞”，翻譯成白話文是：約嗎？【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
古人也很開放，一首“花間詞”，翻譯成白話文是：約嗎？【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
縱觀史書
views
May 7, 2025
更多精彩內容，請點擊下方清單查看：
• 曆史人物
• 曆史知識
頻道往期精彩視頻：
• 明朝「最懶」對聯：上聯和下聯一字不差，卻成千古名對流傳至今【縱觀史書】#歷...
• 康熙的女兒端靜公主被丈夫踢死，康熙得知後，是怎樣為她復仇的？【縱觀史書】#...
• 李世民放了390名死囚回家過年，約定年後再斬，最終回來多少人？【縱觀史書】...
• 寡婦出上聯：「野花不種年年有」，秀才對出下聯，抱得美人歸【縱觀史書】#歷史...
• 蘇軾納了十二歲的小妾，初見時寫下千古名句，成為後世男人的花言巧語【縱觀史書...
• 蘇軾見到友人妻子漂亮，羨慕之余為其寫下一首詞，感動世人近千年【縱觀史書】#...
• 書生嫌妻年老色衰，出上聯：「荷敗蓮殘，落葉歸根成老藕」，妻子下聯成絕世經典...
• 秀才出上聯：「呂府姑娘，下口大過上口」，下聯更絕，諷刺意味十足【縱觀史書】...
• 蘇軾的小妹出上聯：「人曾是僧，人弗能成佛」，和尚的下聯卻讓她氣憤不已【縱觀...
• 1997年，浙江古廟發現梁山伯墓，墓碑保存完好，揭開梁祝化蝶真相【縱觀史書...
#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#歷史萬花鏡#奇聞#歷史風雲天下
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
Videos
About
縱觀史書
青樓女子出上聯：「蜻蜓輕停青亭上」，唐伯虎巧對下聯，眾人直呼絕妙【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
青樓女子出上聯：「蜻蜓輕停青亭上」，唐伯虎巧對下聯，眾人直呼絕妙【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
Join
Subscribe
79
Share
Download
Thanks
Clip
6,639 views Mar 16, 2025
更多精彩內容，請點擊下方清單查看：
• 曆史人物
• 曆史知識
頻道往期精彩視頻：
• 明朝「最懶」對聯：上聯和下聯一字不差，卻成千古名對流傳至今【縱觀史書】#歷...
• 康熙的女兒端靜公主被丈夫踢死，康熙得知後，是怎樣為她復仇的？【縱觀史書】#...
• 李世民放了390名死囚回家過年，約定年後再斬，最終回來多少人？【縱觀史書】...
• 寡婦出上聯：「野花不種年年有」，秀才對出下聯，抱得美人歸【縱觀史書】#歷史...
• 蘇軾納了十二歲的小妾，初見時寫下千古名句，成為後世男人的花言巧語【縱觀史書...
• 蘇軾見到友人妻子漂亮，羨慕之余為其寫下一首詞，感動世人近千年【縱觀史書】#...
• 書生嫌妻年老色衰，出上聯：「荷敗蓮殘，落葉歸根成老藕」，妻子下聯成絕世經典...
• 秀才出上聯：「呂府姑娘，下口大過上口」，下聯更絕，諷刺意味十足【縱觀史書】...
• 蘇軾的小妹出上聯：「人曾是僧，人弗能成佛」，和尚的下聯卻讓她氣憤不已【縱觀...
• 1997年，浙江古廟發現梁山伯墓，墓碑保存完好，揭開梁祝化蝶真相【縱觀史書...
#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#歷史萬花鏡#奇聞#歷史風雲天下
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
Videos
About
縱觀史書
4 Comments
rongmaw lin
Add a comment...
@HuguangLi
1 month ago
下联有三个人字，似乎并不工整，到底是不是唐伯虎对出的下联？有何处可以考究？ 9:12
Reply
@huili1056
1 month ago
胡编乱造, 无稽之谈！ 16:00
1
Reply
@honyoungkwok4046
1 month ago
平仄不對，詞性不對，不成對聯。
1
Reply
Tuesday, May 06, 2025
27歲的王勃去世前，留一篇3200字奇文，至今無人敢翻譯，原因很簡單【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
27歲的王勃去世前，留一篇3200字奇文，至今無人敢翻譯，原因很簡單【縱觀史書】#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#奇聞#文學
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
May 6, 2025
更多精彩內容，請點擊下方清單查看：
• 曆史人物
• 曆史知識
頻道往期精彩視頻：
• 明朝「最懶」對聯：上聯和下聯一字不差，卻成千古名對流傳至今【縱觀史書】#歷...
• 康熙的女兒端靜公主被丈夫踢死，康熙得知後，是怎樣為她復仇的？【縱觀史書】#...
• 李世民放了390名死囚回家過年，約定年後再斬，最終回來多少人？【縱觀史書】...
• 寡婦出上聯：「野花不種年年有」，秀才對出下聯，抱得美人歸【縱觀史書】#歷史...
• 蘇軾納了十二歲的小妾，初見時寫下千古名句，成為後世男人的花言巧語【縱觀史書...
• 蘇軾見到友人妻子漂亮，羨慕之余為其寫下一首詞，感動世人近千年【縱觀史書】#...
• 書生嫌妻年老色衰，出上聯：「荷敗蓮殘，落葉歸根成老藕」，妻子下聯成絕世經典...
• 秀才出上聯：「呂府姑娘，下口大過上口」，下聯更絕，諷刺意味十足【縱觀史書】...
• 蘇軾的小妹出上聯：「人曾是僧，人弗能成佛」，和尚的下聯卻讓她氣憤不已【縱觀...
• 1997年，浙江古廟發現梁山伯墓，墓碑保存完好，揭開梁祝化蝶真相【縱觀史書...
#歷史#歷史故事#歷史人物#史話館#歷史萬花鏡#奇聞#歷史風雲天下
縱觀史書
18.1K subscribers
Videos
About
縱觀史書
Fifty Years of Quantum Chromodynamics (The Theory of The Strong Nuclear ...
Fifty Years of Quantum Chromodynamics (The Theory of The Strong Nuclear Force) - David Gross
Institute for Advanced Study
144K subscribers
Subscribe
144
Share
Download
Clip
Save
5,127 views Jul 11, 2023
Prospects in Theoretical Physics 2023: Understanding Confinement
Topic: Fifty Years of Quantum Chromodynamics (The Theory of The Strong Nuclear Force)
Speaker: David Gross
Affiliation: KITP, UCSB
Date: July 10, 2023
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Transcript
Search in video
0:14
okay so to cap off this uh wonderful first day of the school we have a
0:20
special treat a lecture by David Gross on 50 years of tcd and David is not only
0:28
one of the founders of qcd he's also one of the organizers of this school and uh
0:36
it's perfectly timed to be right around 50 years since the historic paper by uh
0:43
David and his graduate student at the time Frank wilcheck which was written
0:48
around a mile from here in chadwin Hall so yesterday was a
0:55
pretty nerve-wracking day because almost all flights to New York were canceled
1:02
and David's flight landed somewhere in Washington Dallas and then he said well
1:10
I think he set one of the world records in in the process of getting here maybe
1:16
for the number of uber calls and and the distance that this Uber
1:23
covered so so you truly won the extra mile or maybe
1:30
extra 200 miles on the way here so I'm very grateful to him for showing up and
1:37
we greatly look forward to this lecture thank you
1:47
um well this works foreign
1:53
it's really great to see you all we were
1:58
somewhat surprised the organizers in the workshop but what interest there is among the younger
2:04
generation and a 50 year old problem uh which we know has to do with the real
2:13
world and is enormously exciting and you
2:18
will learn a lot from the school I hope but you'll also it'll become clear that
2:25
there are a lot of open problems that you can help solve in the next 50 years
2:31
we don't want to you know qcd is going to be around for a few thousand years at least and uh it
2:38
would be nice to to finish it off or at least make significant progress this century
2:46
so I'll talk to you guys 50 years well
2:52
it's quite amazing uh to think back 50 years ago since on the one hand like
2:59
yesterday um especially coming back to Princeton on the other hand seems infinitely far
3:06
away um it's almost 100 years
3:11
anniversary to the birth of quantum mechanics in the form we know it still
3:19
um and so they're likely to be interesting celebrations next year the following
3:25
year um
3:30
but let me start the story at the beginning of nuclear physics with
3:37
110 years ago with Rutherford and boar
3:44
so the story really begins with Rutherford's discovery of the nucleus
3:50
over 100 years ago um which is my opinion
3:57
perhaps the greatest experiment of the 20th century there were three things that Rutherford
4:03
achieved in this experiment but first of course was to discover the nucleus the
4:08
second was to uh get a good classical picture of the atom and the
4:17
third was to immediately promote the quantum description of the atom and
4:22
the start of a 10 Years Journey to quantum mechanics As We Know
4:28
what he did of course was try to determine what the atom was made out of nobody had any really good idea
4:36
by scattering particles Alpha rays which alpha particles which he won the Nobel
4:43
Prize in chemistry for for discovering and using
4:49
you never won a Nobel Prize in physics I think if he had lived longer he probably would have for this much more important
4:55
discovery is students were the detector they sat in a dark room for hours and observed
5:02
the scintillations of a fluorescent screen where the scattered alpha particles scattered off
5:10
called nuclei gold atoms and uh he was very surprised that a lot
5:16
of the um particles came back at very large angles and uh
5:24
he calculated somebody told me that he didn't actually do the calculation that was disappointing
5:29
it's called the Rutherford cross-section but supposedly we had the help of a mathematician to
5:37
um use Maxwell's Theory to calculate the the cross-section and deduced
5:44
in fact that they're all of the massive or most of the mass and all the positive
5:49
charge in the atom was located in a very small region of space
5:56
you could only set a a
6:01
lower limit on what the radius of the nucleus was uh but that was a discovery of the
6:07
nucleus and in a sense LED immediately to a planetary model of the atom which
6:13
bore than turned into a
6:19
Bohr model of the atom and from there the quantum mechanics really required almost no new experimental evidence it
6:26
was all there you had to make sense out of out of this
6:32
uh the existence of quanta and the Bohr model of the atom which was very
6:39
successful most important perhaps
6:44
um Rutherford invented the method we still use today
6:50
to discover physics at Short distances you want to discover the properties of
6:56
matter at the summit Atomic lens scales smash protons on a fixed Target or
7:03
protons and protons or electrons and electrons scatter particles of particles lots of stuff comes out you analyze what
7:10
comes out probability distributions of the scattering events
7:16
uh we haven't improved conceptually on that tool in 110 years
7:22
even though it now we're reaching perhaps the limits of that tool from an economic and
7:30
technical point of view maybe we need to find some new method for exploring arbitrarily short
7:36
distances but we have it still Rutherford's of course we've greatly improved it all right see
7:43
greatly improved the detectors from these uh observations of pinpoints of light on a
7:52
scintillating screen but essentially it's the same thing so incredible experiment the atom the
8:00
nucleus and the experimental tool for for high
8:05
energy fundamental physics well
8:12
going forward 50 years or so as a graduate student so this talk by
8:17
the way is going to be um highly historical
8:23
the audience I see before me say most of the audience almost all the audience was
8:28
not alive 50 years ago but I also realized that for many of the
8:35
audience their parents weren't alive 50 years ago
8:43
um so 50 years or most of you seems like an awful long time
8:49
and I conjecture that very little of you very little of you actually know much
8:55
about the history of physics the history of the standard model is through qcd it's a mistake
9:02
it's not because it's interesting uh fascinating to understand your part
9:09
in a grand endeavor you know to join this incredible
9:16
march to understand the fundamental nature of 400 years old you're going to be part of it for the next 50 years
9:24
but also you'll learn a lot about how to think how to avoid going in Long directions
9:30
lots of things by studying history so might might be useful in addition to
9:37
enjoyable I admit this is my view of the history
9:44
of a personal point of view but that's always the case
9:52
the anyway so I entered graduates about 50 years ago at that point I was at
9:58
Berkeley which was the center of high energy physics that had the biggest accelerator in the world six TV sorry
10:05
six GB only down by a factor of a thousand but
10:11
it was enormously exciting because new particles were literally discovered every few weeks no hadrons
10:19
um and it was known by that time that there were two kinds of forces that acted
10:25
within the nuclei strong forces you know an electro what we now call electrolique or weak interactions
10:32
and I was always attracted by the strong interactions partly because well there were all these
10:37
continuing experimental discoveries very exciting but also it was especially
10:43
intractable new particles are being discovered all
10:49
the time they look just like the proton and the neutron which had been discovered
10:54
100 years before and they all seem equally fundamental equally Elementary
11:01
wasn't clear at all what were the basic constituents of nuclear matter
11:07
and then of course there was no principle to determine the Dynamics there was no
11:13
symmetry principle the principles that guided Einstein in the case of gravity
11:19
or there was no direct experimental clues that guided Maxwell
11:25
uh following in their footsteps people of course tried to construct theories of
11:31
Quantum field theories of pions and protons and but there was not based on any
11:38
under you know underlying principle and then if you wrote down a theory as
11:45
you power first tried to do introducing a carrier of the nuclear
11:51
force uh boson they would carry it was originally a spin one but then spin zero
11:59
a Pion which was shortly discovered one of the first particles in addition to
12:04
the neutron um it was clear that having introduced the
12:11
pine you could estimate the coupling of that Pi into nucleons to protons
12:16
and that coupling were strong so how do you calculate so we didn't know what the constituents
12:22
were we didn't know what the principle that underlies the Dynamics was and it was clear from the beginning that
12:29
you added the old storm coupling so you couldn't calculate
12:35
Tyson well known to this in this institute tried very hard after
12:42
the Triumph for QED which resurrected Quantum field Theory
12:47
on the doldrums of the 30s uh Dyson tried to construct a Quantum
12:54
field theory of nezons at protons and you know and to figure out how to deal
12:59
with strong coupling and uh I think somewhat characteristically of
13:06
Dyson after a few years of trying he was convinced that his ideas were
13:11
going nowhere there's a beautiful article I think it describes a discussion he had with Fermi
13:20
which deflated him so much that gave up and said uh
13:26
and said how it went to work on other things but again like many theorists
13:32
if they themselves give up they predict as Dyson did the correct Theory will not be found for a hundred years
13:42
the general feeling I must say was that something revolutionary would be
13:48
required and probably not in the framework of you
13:54
know not just following the lesson of QED the Revolution was needed
14:00
now in retrospect it's clear why the problem was shown was so big
14:07
and it's because we now know that the strong interactions are mediated by
14:13
gauge fields that couples to charges color to the colored quarks and gluons
14:20
and in the case of strong interactions the charges were completely hidden
14:26
the courts were hidden the ruins were hidden not not at all like QED where the
14:35
charges were quite visible and usable
14:41
there were no quarks and people started smashing protons
14:46
together uh right after the war when the government eager to build even
14:54
more powerful bonds or whatever we would come up with uh gave I created the field of high
15:00
energy and high dollar physics but no matter how hard you smashed had
15:07
grounds together all of it came out were other add-ons which looked similar to the original ones
15:14
and you never produced the visible charges of the basic
15:20
building blocks uh in addition Quantum field Theory
15:27
which was the framework that uh sort of was at the basis of
15:34
fundamental physics at the time and had a remarkable success in the case of
15:39
quantum electrodynamics in the late 40s early 50s
15:45
was under attack uh why was that well the big development
15:53
in the 40s 50s was renewalization hearing which was you know
16:00
retrospectively not such a big deal it was truly understanding
16:07
today we're in a profound way but then in a technical way how to deal with the
16:12
UV divergences that are that uh appeared in all
16:19
um quantum Beyond tree approximation in uh in any
16:25
Quantum field Theory but renewalization was thought by the
16:30
inventors and developers of the scheme to be a trick and sort of that's how it
16:36
was taught at the time this was a trick this was a way of sweeping Infinities under the rug
16:42
and it's so such a ugly way of dealing with what was
16:49
thought to be a profound problem the UV Infinities that uh it probably an
16:56
indication that a Revolution was needed they're also absolutely
17:02
in Quantum field Theory and among the high energy elementary particle physicists
17:09
really no useful non-perturbative methods um
17:15
in fact first course I took on Quantum field theory was from Stephen Weinberg
17:22
I'll show you many of you have read his books foreign
17:30
rules for higher spin particles and
17:36
he first lecture wrote on the Blackboard field Theory equals perturbation Theory
17:43
actually I don't think he said prohibition there I think he said field Theory equals final diagrams
17:54
there was a theory or we would call today an effective field Theory a phenomological theory of
18:00
the weak interactions Family Support family on Theory it was moderately successful
18:07
um there was no underlying principle behind it it was phenomenology but it worked
18:13
extremely well it's a very good effective field Theory but nobody had the Vegas idea how to
18:18
make it unitary how to renewableize it and so on it was not necessary at the
18:24
time experiments didn't demand it
18:30
Yang Mills Theory appeared very early 1954. but
18:37
it was plagued with massless posanswich nobody under stood how to remove seemed
18:44
to be there for an interesting mathematical extension of electrodynamics but not a realistic
18:52
Theory nonetheless of course here has tried to apply it
18:57
through strong interactions they coupled the gauge fields too the only symmetries
19:04
that they know about in the strong interactions which were flavors of the truth now today we
19:11
understand those are accidental symmetries there's no deep principle that says the
19:16
up and down Quark massages are are almost the same and so on it's not an exact symmetry it made no
19:23
sense and then there was a real Attack on
19:29
Quantum field Theory it came from my thesis advisor Jeffrey 2
19:36
and many other people but he was the leader of the Revolution
19:42
which said among the rest that all hydrants are equally fundamental they are looked the same
19:48
so let's assume they're no really Elementary constituents there might be an infinite number of hadrons somehow
19:54
they're all equally fundamental uh but then how do we construct a theory
20:02
so and there was a second idea called the bootstrap now the bootstrap is
20:08
something you've all heard of nowadays because uh it's come back in the Vogue and it's
20:14
very interesting it's so difficult to find a analytic unitary s Matrix as you know
20:24
very few exact examples some integral theories but
20:29
uh that wasn't understood at the time and um
20:38
and since there was no underlying principle and all
20:43
there's no Elementary particles maybe what you should do is try to find a
20:51
s Matrix that's what you observed uh based on that satisfies the general
20:57
principles especially analyticity which follows for locality
21:02
or causality and unit therapy that's the bootstrap program now the
21:09
boots that program back then was equally popular you could start doing stuff you
21:14
know writing some approximational left-hand side of the board and then
21:21
using by Crossing symmetry as a part for manual artisticity right something on
21:27
the right hand side and see if you could make them equal
21:32
General print those general principles the idea was would determine a unique
21:38
solution first we know nowadays that that's not the case there are many solutions for example qcd with any
21:46
number of flavor any number of colors
21:54
and we have now many examples of exact as major excuse
22:01
but that was the idea of the bootstrap and what it did was create a generation
22:08
you know a good part of a generation of young quizzes like yourselves who uh didn't know anything about
22:15
Quantum filter now on the other side of the Cold War
22:23
barrier of the Iron Curtain there was a perhaps more interesting attack on
22:28
Quantum field Theory the Landau poll or the problem of zero charge
22:34
which was uh
22:39
an investigation of an effective renewalization Group by a Russian
22:46
group that studied how the physical coupling
22:52
what over 137 in QED depends on the bear coupling
22:58
you include the quantum Corrections and take the ultraviolet cutoff to Infinity as you should to get stuck though
23:07
Continuum Theory and working the lowest order in if you
23:13
want in the beta functionalization group Lando in his group discovered what
23:19
that the physical correct coupling measures the value of the electric charge in a theory or the ultraviolet
23:27
cutoff Lambda vanishes no matter how big you make the bear coupling the coupling
23:33
if you want that defines the charge at the cutoff
23:39
vanishes which is a way of today we would argue
23:45
this such a theory the uh there is if true
23:51
and it probably is for Pure QED um although not proven uh means that
23:58
there is no Continuum limit QED does not exist as a a finite
24:06
well-behaved unitary Quantum filtering
24:11
and that's sort of what landed out concluded now the phenomenon of course
24:16
is screening you know if you put a charge into the vacuum
24:24
the virtual pairs that exist in the vacuum screen the charge
24:30
and that screening means that the electric force decreases you move away from the charge
24:38
increases the move towards the charge and at least in this lower starter
24:46
calculation uh that effect means that
24:52
keep the charge at Infinity which is how you do the measurement of the electric charge fixed the bear charge vanishes
25:01
and the theory is trivial so
25:06
Landau I mean this is probably true for all
25:13
nylons theories not an asymptotically free theory in four dimensions but
25:20
um land down certainly didn't have Good Grounds but you know he was
25:26
bald or jump to conclusions he said 1960 we
25:32
reached a conclusion that within the limits of formal electrodynamics by which he really means Quantum field
25:38
Theory a point interaction a local interaction is equivalent for any intensity
25:46
to no interaction at all fix the physical couplings
25:51
no interaction we are driven to the conclusions the
25:58
hamiltonian method for strong interaction is dead and must be buried although of course
26:05
with deserve an honor now
26:11
why do you say strong interaction same conclusion would be for QED but of
26:16
course he knew understood that the problem you know are so
26:21
the ultraviolet is so far away so much farther than the blank mass in
26:28
the case of QED the Lando poll if you want best
26:34
uh that it's irrelevant but for the strong interactions the
26:39
problem was immediate the coupling was strong and if you went higher and higher in energy it would diverge at some finite
26:46
energy so um now Orlando is a very powerful creature
26:53
and Soviet Union and uh
26:58
maybe it's not true for the whole Community but certainly his influence was enormous
27:04
and students young students like Sasha sitting back here
27:10
we're not allowed to work on Quantum field Theory they were smart enough to continue to
27:16
work on Quantum field Theory but under the guise that they were doing condensed matter here
27:22
right [Music] and he got into trouble she can tell you about some other time
27:32
so that was the situation theoretically
27:38
these are important lessons because you you know these were very powerful
27:44
people were very smart brilliant physicists land down two metal stem
27:52
uh so just remember that when all of us talk to you with great Authority
27:58
we might be equally wrong about not about most of the things
28:06
experimental situation was much brighter I must say I suppose just the opposite
28:11
of today theory was kind of um non-existent
28:17
but experimentally there were many new discoveries new particles new patterns
28:22
of particles new symmetries approximate symmetry is being discovered new
28:28
accelerators but even here there are interesting lessons
28:36
so many theorists and experimenters at the time believe that the secret of the strong interactions lay in the high
28:42
energy behavior of scattering amplitudes at low momentum transfer when you
28:47
scatter protons of protons 99.9 percent of the time what happens is they
28:55
just go forward spray a lot of particles in the forward Direction
29:00
and you can measure things like a total cross-section fraction scattered low momentum transfer
29:07
scattering now we know that that's not what we do
29:13
nowadays we look at that point one percent of the events which have larger momentum transfer that's how you look at
29:19
Short distances and discover new particles and new processes
29:25
so why were they doing this well
29:31
it was experimentally easy that's where most of the data works
29:39
they discovered some interesting patterns in diffraction scattering
29:44
Reggie Behavior constant total cross-section
29:50
the theorists develop theories or ideas about how to
29:56
describe diffraction scatter in total cost section and so on so there was a sort of mutual
30:03
confirmation of each other's biases for experimenters
30:09
it was good to study low momentum transfer because you had bigger statistics
30:15
always good theorists are told them that's what's really
30:21
interesting because they were studying Reggie polls and other things
30:28
and no one was really interested in the high momentum transfer experiments
30:35
which like Rutherford just turned out to be where the secret
30:40
of the strong interactions were to be found the theorists well
30:46
misguided the experimentalists were these were
30:53
harder experiments and nobody told them it might be interesting
31:02
so back to me my story after escaping from the bootstrap and
31:10
nuclear democracy which was dominant on the west coast of
31:16
the United States I came to Harvard where field theory was
31:23
acceptable yeah and I started
31:30
studying the properties what we would call today
31:35
the short distance behavior of composite operators and Quantum field Theory although again you know most of the
31:42
tools have not yet been developed operator products expansions kind of formal filter it was really nothing
31:50
but it was one could do this without
31:55
trying to invent our Quantum field Theory because there were operators that are experimentally observable
32:02
not in PP collisions but in EP collisions where you can measure Matrix
32:08
elements and correlation functions of current parenthesis couples electromagnetism or
32:15
to the weak horses so
32:23
at Harvard Callan and I would play the game of scene
32:30
what operator products in modern language would look like if you just made some model or more precisely used
32:37
free field Theory and uh
32:43
among the rest we wrote a sum rule for the structure function of deepened
32:49
elastic scattering so which will come to in a woman which measures
32:55
which is in modern language proportional to the energy medium tensor
33:01
and uh this could be measured in deep elastic
33:07
scattering deep elastic scattering was an experiment that was planned for the
33:14
slack the new slack facility which had an electron beam scattered electrons of
33:21
protons large momentum transfer but Rutherford experiment again but this
33:27
time using photons to explore the structure of the proton
33:34
and beer cane uh looked at the sub Rule and noticed that you know this this and
33:41
dimensional reasoning suggests yeah it could be written without any scale if you
33:48
notice this has dimensions of energy this has dimensions of energy
33:56
and suggested that perhaps these things scale
34:02
there are other some rules one could derive one of the most important actually was one with
34:09
Callan where again you know taking products like this how do you calculate well you assume some model which means
34:16
some free field Theory and well what turned out was that the
34:22
two cross-sections when you scatter Polo photons which have two velicities of
34:27
protons look at the total cross-section and it turns out that the ratio of
34:33
longitudinal to transverse polarizations in the photon are sharp leaders different whether the
34:40
constituents of the proton have spin one half or spin zero or spin one using free
34:48
filter and then
34:55
there are other some rules the experiments showed started in 1968
35:01
and 69 were reported deep elastic scattering at Slack
35:07
now this is an interesting experiment again it in effect discovered that the proton
35:14
looked at like it was made out of freely moving quarks
35:21
and not only that the scaling behavior that
35:26
is sort of inherent in free particles free point-like Behavior
35:33
seemed to work their Quark model some rules seem to
35:38
work and this of course
35:45
was the discovery of quarks scrum metal discovery of forks
35:50
now these guys were kind of bold at the time none of
35:56
the you know when you build a new Exciter a lot of proposals for experiments
36:01
this was so this is the Rutherford experiment in effect so
36:06
it was very strange historically that these are the only people who wanted to do it most of the proposals
36:14
were not even sure what they are because they go back and look but
36:20
it's really there wasn't a clamor to do this experiment everybody thought it would be boring
36:28
the lower energy lower momentum transfer experiments that measured the form
36:34
factor of the proton the distribution of charge within the proton showed that the
36:39
protons kind of diffuse so they thought the cross-section would be diffused like
36:45
Rutherford before Rutherford everyone believed that the structure of the atom was some kind of diffused mess
36:53
not interesting actually like most particles
36:59
experimentalists what they wanted to do was not understand the structure of the
37:05
proton but produce no particles
37:10
experimental hydrophysics always want to see bumps they want to see new particles they
37:16
don't necessarily are motivated by understanding new structure a new process
37:26
anyway it turned out much like Rutherford easiest explanation of these experiments
37:33
was the protons is made out of freely moving Point particles
37:40
pythons was feynman's work that looked as far as you could test them using
37:46
totally ill-motivated sub rules like quarks
37:51
so this was enormously confusing
37:57
now the fact the fact that some of my some rules worked and the experiments together
38:03
convinced me that hadrons are made out of Point like constituents
38:09
the constituents were quarks quirks were real
38:15
but then how could that possibly be you never produced quarks and experiments it
38:20
had to be confined we now say within has to be some strong coupling that
38:26
holds them there throwing interactions I think as we're strong so how come you
38:32
you could get free Behavior how could one explain scaling the
38:39
absence of course now again you might think okay everybody
38:45
got this message but that's not true it was only a small group of people who were
38:53
obsessed with this most people
38:59
uh for good reasons said well this is interesting but one
39:05
it'll probably go away now when something truly new is discovered
39:11
that isn't a sharp resonance and obvious discovery of a new particle
39:18
people are justifiably skeptical the errors in the initial experiments
39:24
were 20 30 percent hey girl boss
39:29
the energy was extremely low 20 GV
39:36
you're at every right to be skeptical on the other hand the
39:42
the conclusions were so striking that it uh
39:48
some people it was became an obsession certainly for me
39:53
so the obvious thing was scaling now scaling had not played any role in
40:01
in uh matching Quantum field Theory until that point
40:07
because scaling is not a exact symmetry of nature anywhere
40:14
in elementary particle Foods
40:19
somewhat later it became you know a big thing in commence metaphysics but
40:25
and the study of critical phenomena but that connection was still someone in the
40:30
future and at that time there was no interaction between people who were doing column filtering particle physics
40:38
and people doing what we uh
40:44
previous generation of my mentors called Squall of State visit
40:55
so I really was obsessed with trying to understand how this could be
41:03
it was clear that was trying to understand the scaling in the context of quantum field
41:10
Theory with Quantum effects destroyed scaling uh immediately
41:16
these some rules that we derived were simply invalid in an interacting Quantum
41:22
filter
41:27
by 1972 I had a plan a very definite plan
41:33
about how to make my advisor happy and kill quality filter
41:41
so idea was scaling was real the experiments were getting better it was holding up some rules were even better
41:47
satisfying um I really understood that the only way
41:53
scaling Could Happen would be that the opposite of QED the
42:00
at small distances large amount of transfer deeper elastic scattering your
42:05
probing the behavior of the theory in the ultraviolet short distances
42:11
if the coupling could vanish asymptotic Freedom which we call it
42:19
later um would solve the problem
42:24
and one thing we tried to prove was that that was actually required
42:30
and uh based on initial study of Parisi kurtalin and I showed that for
42:38
in a sense about uh the framework or Quantum field theory if you want to
42:44
explain asympatic Freedom you have to have sorry if you want to explain scaling if that's exact
42:51
phenomenal nature then you require us encountered freedom we did not discuss notable engage theories
42:59
because they are in fact well methods proof broke down
43:07
and then the idea was to show that asymptotically free theories not that there are no accidentally free theories
43:13
and that was you know conceivable to prove because if you have asymptotic freedom
43:20
at Short distances then you can trust motivation period short distance so you can do essentially one Loop calculations
43:27
and decide whether any given Quantum field theory is or is not asymptotically free
43:33
and they're accountable theories which are renormalizable
43:39
so that was actually proved by Coleman and I all of this
43:44
happened in 19 came out 1973
43:50
and uh there we showed that any Theory any number of scalar Fields been runoff
43:56
fields or barely engaged particles are a synthetically free
44:07
then the idea was to take the final Theory um
44:13
so at this point my first graduates appeared 72
44:20
or 70 yeah um thank wheelchair
44:25
when he still had hair and uh
44:32
and like you know excellent I have one more thing to do let's
44:39
calculate I want to be engaged theories and this indeed is just about a year 50
44:46
years ago so um
44:52
not only being engaged series of course had been around since 54.
44:58
1968 Weinberg wrote a lot a great paper called a model
45:05
of leptons which put forward what is now the issue to course you on Weinberg Salam Weinberg
45:12
rash house the theory of the electroweak interactions without the cork
45:18
why didn't he put in quarks Weinberg didn't believe in courts
45:23
at all you just thought that was not nonsense for obvious reasons
45:29
nobody's ever seen a pork and how could there be corkscreen so it was a model of leptons
45:37
but it wasn't renormalizable or he didn't know how to make it be normalizable he didn't know how to show
45:42
that it was a normalizable and so there was almost no work on the record week
45:48
again a lesson for you guys there might be things like that that nobody's
45:53
talking about that you won't hear about in these courses just lying around
45:59
but when it hooked development showed that you could renormalize a theory and
46:05
calculate suddenly there was a
46:10
and aside from the development of Electro week
46:16
Theory that had the impact of introducing people to functional
46:24
methods path integrals which were gave the understanding of how to write down
46:30
perturbation Theory or Edge theories ghosts and so on body of
46:37
public everyone had totally ignored the use of functional intervals in elementary
46:43
particle physics until then again there might be all sorts of tools
46:50
out there that nobody uses for 20 years more
46:58
and of course not to be engaged there so this was the last
47:04
and when we discovered that these theories possessed the remarkable theory of asymptotic abortion free filtered to
47:11
me by that time it was a complete surprise because I expected that there were no no
47:21
it was so Universal in for non lessons other freedom
47:26
that that's what I expected
47:31
and but the implications for me Rob is once you have that you that the only way
47:40
following the previous arguments to explain to you okay and scaling and one should look for a non-appeal
47:47
engage theory of the storm interactions and there was from then on there was no
47:55
choice these arguments the only possible theory
48:00
was the Angel's Theory as far as the gauge part of the theory
48:05
goes well
48:11
it had already been known phenomologically that quarks which have been identified
48:19
as which had been suggested as a way of organizing the
48:24
flavor symmetries of the strong interactions the approximate symmetries
48:29
of matter um there had to be an addition three labels
48:35
degenerate courts with three colors in order to explain
48:43
the magnitude of the E plus C minus photorecrusters Pi North BK
48:50
any other suggestions but courts are really thought to be
48:56
mathematical objects no problem attaching three labels to them although there were suggestions
49:02
that they might be associated with the with the quantum numbers of
49:08
of su3 gauge group so the
49:15
if you buy the colors in the three flavors that we knew about at the
49:22
time there was no choice but hey model based on three triplets of fermions within
49:28
issue three color gauge group to provide the strong interactions
49:35
and um that's qcv now why does qcds
49:43
why is it not synthetically free well it's obviously the opposite of screening it's anti-screening
49:49
and what is the physical motivation well it's best to think about it magnetically
49:55
you know euclidean Theory that's just
50:01
or in any Theory you could think about magnetically electrically magnetically
50:07
luas we put a an external magnet into the vacuum an
50:14
external colored magnet to the vacuum the virtual gluons are like permanent
50:20
magnets
50:27
so are by the white Forks but the Magnetic Moment of the Bruins much
50:32
bigger and they act like uh little magnets would do in the
50:39
presence of another magnet they align paramagnetism where the fourth at large distances
50:46
increases and at Short distances decreases
50:51
paramagnetism is the opposite of diamagnetism if you want to use an elect
50:58
a magnetic point of view and uh
51:04
that's that's a lot of freedom for you and you can work it out numerically
51:11
calculate the beta function that way that's of course not what we did originally
51:18
um oops anyway I'd always wonder why Landau
51:24
you know didn't say could have discovered all of this
51:30
um back in the late 50s by saying okay and anti-screening diode dielectric
51:37
vacuum is a dielectric medium that's really bad but what if it was
51:44
paramagnetic and he could have invented well the
51:49
English Theory already exists he could have come that way to this discovery but
51:57
hello yep
52:18
no it doesn't doesn't work actually it's harder
52:23
sorry why why doesn't it work well I actually we taught I tried that's
52:31
uh and didn't succe you know so why doesn't in QED
52:37
uh if you were if you're thinking physically about screening
52:43
right you conclude that the QED is not asymptotically free
52:49
you can also just think about the diagrams that contribute to charging normalization it's just a one little
52:54
diagram vacuum polarization diagram its sign is fixed by unitarity that's it
53:01
an immunity gauge theories the gluons are charged it's a more complicated effect in fact
53:07
the real origin of asymptotic freedom is because of the coupling of this external
53:13
charge to the virtual charges so it's really the triple glow on vertex doesn't
53:18
exist so couldn't give a general argument indeed
53:25
partly because they're more diagrams partly because it isn't in fact true
53:32
but to do that you had to do the calculation so that was so I didn't do that really
53:38
that was the point of doing the calculation with my new graduate
53:44
student who needed something to work on
53:50
anyway there are you know the one thing the great thing about history is what you
53:57
learn when you go back and read the original papers you learn a lot a lot more physics than
54:03
you do by reading the paper the many papers that come after second you learn about the mistakes that
54:10
people make you learn from that experience and what you
54:17
then there's the fantasy which I like to engage in but historians abhor which is what if
54:24
imagining other scenarios and there's if you think about it there's so many ways
54:30
that one could have arrived at what we know to be true nowadays
54:37
that's kind of fun to like Landau looking for paramagnetic
54:43
Quantum field theories prevent anyway let's we're making the mistake of
54:52
I always like so um
54:57
anyway that explained gave us a theory and a unique Theory there was really no
55:03
argument about what you could adding scalars to the theory
55:10
we tried can't destroyed asymptotic Freedom there was no
55:15
and everything we knew about the strong interactions were the few exceptions of outstanding problems like the U1
55:22
Ada Prime so on um we're consistent with qcd
55:31
but there was still the problem of why you always see quarks and uh in our
55:38
larger version of that letter uh we were
55:45
uh considered the possibility that that the Symmetry wasn't broken like the weak
55:51
interactions but exact ly and then well why don't we see these
55:56
Mass these blue ones and and
56:04
noted that there could be little connection between the free lagrangian to write down the spectrum of States
56:10
because of strong coupling and it could be that that suppresses all
56:17
but color schemer at stake now the idea was really at that point nothing more
56:22
than the fact that since the force gets stronger
56:30
extrapolation the perturbation Theory uh that could confine the courts
56:36
but that was a very uncomfortable idea because there was no
56:43
real understanding We Now understand
56:48
how that occurs well so
56:56
classically of course the force between quarks falls off like one of our gauss's
57:01
law and
57:07
atoms can be ionized and at the classical level of course
57:13
that's what would happen more or less it's the properties of virtual particles
57:21
in the vacuum or the vacuum which we now have pictures of from lattice cage
57:26
theory that modify the flex lines that
57:33
and squeeze the flux through a flux tube
57:39
now this picture uh was put forward
57:45
pretty rapidly by manual stand with others of an electronic a dual analog of
57:53
vortex flux tubes in a superconduct and very easily
58:01
electrical confinement is a kind of dual to Magnetic confinement of multiples in
58:08
the superconductor and as you heard in the previous talk point we talked
58:15
that or very vague analogy is one of the
58:20
directions where we might hope to prove or use
58:27
such ideas to understand mesons as flux tubes of electrical flux
58:33
and of course that kind of confinement produces a
58:38
linear confinement because the flux now
58:46
penetrating a finite area and we can see that on the lettuce
58:55
so that was a physical picture that came along and it's still after 50 almost 50
59:03
years we're trying to make that into a picture that has mathematical rigor
59:10
and more important analytic control
59:16
that's the goal of this collaboration won't confirmed
59:21
now historically qcd was not accepted by everybody of course
59:27
but it was immediate for a very small group of what I call spark people
59:36
it was really interesting to see how people reacted with an idea
59:42
like that but for the majority of my colleagues
59:52
the people on the West Coast didn't understand Quantum filter at all
59:59
Ken Wilson who should have discovered this was
1:00:04
motivated by the idea that all interesting
1:00:10
fundamental questions in physics are consequences of what emerges in the
1:00:15
infrared from some ultraviolet Theory which you didn't care about
1:00:21
and that the experiments which suggested simple feeling of short distances
1:00:26
would this would that was not just experimental too early to tell would disappear
1:00:35
um and then there were people liked my
1:00:41
colleague at Princeton Eugene vigner who could not accept that you could possibly describe a theory in terms of
1:00:48
particles you couldn't produce as asymptotic States because his definition of an elementary
1:00:55
particle was an irreducible unitary representation of the barnacore group
1:01:01
that you could produce the symbolic states to the observables which were estimated
1:01:09
but for this group and probably many others it was almost immediate
1:01:16
and in addition you could calculate
1:01:22
easily using perturbation Theory could make predictions
1:01:28
and that's what physicists like to do so there was a slow but steady growth
1:01:36
lots of calculations interesting applications immediately
1:01:42
but the real or yeah then there were very important theoretical milestones at
1:01:47
least for me one was latter stage Theory so Ken you
1:01:52
know who was misguided what he was looking for switched overnight
1:02:00
which I admire enormously and said okay let's calculate the mass
1:02:06
spectrum of headlines 1974 lattice Gage Theory what you heard
1:02:12
about today it has taken 40 years 50 almost 50 years
1:02:18
to get to the stage where you can now calculate the hydronic Mass Spectrum to better than a
1:02:25
percent and an increase in power
1:02:31
which Mike didn't mention by a factor of 10 to the 18.
1:02:37
10 to the 9 of that has come from Moore's Law computers 1974.
1:02:43
those of us who were alive
1:02:49
we remember how totally primitive it was 10 to the 9 came from Theory from
1:02:56
algorithm development understanding vermions better finite size effect
1:03:04
so that is quite you saw some of the evidence today it's quite amazing what they can
1:03:10
do but gotta remember one can have you know let's calculate
1:03:17
the Spectrum Wilson by the way gave up after a few
1:03:23
years says it can't can't work nonetheless people persisted luckily
1:03:28
but it did take an increase in power of by 18 orders and
1:03:38
um for me the cyborg is high squared Theory two-dimensional Theory
1:03:45
with no parameters except for coupling and developed design dynamical Mass Gap
1:03:51
and dimensional Transportation was very important to see and asymptotically free
1:03:56
Theory albeit in two Dimensions that for a large n you could solve exactly and develop the kind of non-preservative
1:04:04
mascot that we expect in qcd also at hoof's solution for large n
1:04:12
again of two-dimensional qcd which kind of confines trivially in a
1:04:18
way but still exhibited a model where you could see the fundamental quarks such or
1:04:25
distances but are never produced as a symbolic States was very reassuring of that possibility
1:04:31
in qcd but the real thing that changed the fear
1:04:39
acceptance was electron positron annihilation
1:04:45
are there the story is interesting the ratio of the total cross-section probably plus C minus to go to hadron
1:04:52
compared to electrons predicted by qcd
1:04:58
by just scaling to be a constant by qcd to
1:05:03
depend number of quarks number of colors charges of the quarks
1:05:08
and it worked very well one of the try early triumphs
1:05:14
of these ideas this is a plot of what the data looked
1:05:21
like in the summer of 1974. I was at a conference at the ictp and Trieste Burke
1:05:29
Richter showed this plot new experiments
1:05:35
at the E plus e minus storage ring at uh
1:05:42
Slack and he concentrated on this
1:05:47
these new data points which he said shows that the cross-section this ratio is not constant
1:05:54
it's rising linearly qcd is dead all those ideas that's all
1:06:02
scaling actually he knew about understood PCD
1:06:07
but scaling whatever it's all dead well as you know this is what happened
1:06:14
just a few months later now many of us in the audience
1:06:20
I think uh Jr and
1:06:25
um
1:06:31
pollitzer and George I had analyzed what I a charm
1:06:38
well the Japes eye would look like it would be very narrow because the coupling is going to zero it's a cool
1:06:44
object down state charm was accepted by all the smart
1:06:50
theorists had to be there had to be another Quark who crossed an electro-week anomalies and su2
1:06:57
like per week Symmetry and so on so on so
1:07:02
theorists again at that time were very timid compared to theorists nowadays they
1:07:09
hadn't had many successes so we didn't scream that well you've just seen charm
1:07:16
we said you're just seeing her
1:07:22
but then very dramatically this resonance uh this Porter Germany was discovered
1:07:30
and there were Within months
1:07:35
within days hours no archive then but rapid
1:07:41
pre-publication of lots of explanations but all the smart people knew well this
1:07:47
is charm and they could start calculating not just harmonium but other
1:07:54
uh charm excited States
1:08:01
and uh all the other explanations were garbage so this totally convinced lots of people
1:08:09
that qcd was on the right track and
1:08:15
well this is just the last 40 Years of using this probe
1:08:21
of Vector mesons as well as porcante pork
1:08:27
bottom not top
1:08:33
what about the experimental tests of asymptotic freedom of qcd
1:08:38
well as mitot said in his lecture logarithms run very slowly
1:08:44
so what is starting with a coupling which we now know is about 0.1
1:08:51
at the range of a few hundred GV and making predictions about what's
1:08:57
going to happen higher energies with logarithmic Behavior so this is uh 16 years after
1:09:05
qcd uh looks pretty good A bunch of experiments they all agree with the
1:09:11
running of the coupling but so there's a straight line to be honest
1:09:18
it's not easy to measure precisely logarithmically changing phenomena
1:09:25
and it really took more like 30 years to get precise tests this is
1:09:31
40 years pretty good uh nowadays these are deviations from
1:09:39
precise scaling that Hera these are just cross-sections
1:09:46
this is the best I could find today
1:09:52
there are updates but this is an indication of the Precision of the tests from many many different
1:10:00
experiments so that you can now measure but if you want the scale of the strong
1:10:07
interactions or the coupling at that scale to
1:10:13
less than a percent but
1:10:18
that's sort of the direct test of the investment letter Kratom but
1:10:24
using that let me calculate the cross-section the deviation from scaling
1:10:29
and the unbelievably precise tests of qcd at LHC
1:10:38
which is most of the events um
1:10:43
since they have any other any surprise discoveries uh
1:10:49
have greatly improved our faith and qcd
1:10:56
but the other you know we really wanted to calculate immediately as soon as possible was the Mass Spectrum of
1:11:03
hadrons and that's a hard problem that's not preservative that's not
1:11:08
the control of the vacuum all we really have analytically getting controllably
1:11:14
as lattice qcd which you started to hear about
1:11:19
today and uh as I said it does require it did require
1:11:29
noon technology and new ideas over many many orders and I do
1:11:37
but now is extraordinarily successful you'll hear a lot about that
1:11:43
there also been impressive calculations uh preservative calculations where one can
1:11:51
just use motivation Theory beta function now this is I just got a
1:11:56
preprint is now like five loops amplitudes which are used for the
1:12:03
backgrounds for new discoveries are required for the
1:12:09
back calculate the backgrounds for new discoveries and or tests of qcd
1:12:15
uh well you all heard much the last decade about credible developments and
1:12:24
understanding deeply new structures that allow one to improve the calculations
1:12:32
uh beyond the leading order which we did to Max deleted over next to next next to
1:12:37
the next to next very beautiful
1:12:43
um hinting at many deep structures enormously powerful and that will slowly
1:12:48
continue I just want to spend a moment on what I regard as the the truly still
1:12:57
for me the most appealing and remarkable features of this
1:13:03
perfect Theory and I I should really speak perfect field Theory
1:13:08
first you know they're really no infinities Noel for violent affinities no
1:13:15
Infinities at all no adjustable parameters and no new physics at Short distances
1:13:22
so what continues to Astound me is is
1:13:28
how we've ended up with an example uh so far of what a perfect quantum
1:13:34
mechanical theory of the world could look like of course we are
1:13:40
like a lot more but this is the minimum for the future
1:13:47
so they're clearly knowledge about Infinities I think that was clear from the lattice calculation the lattice as
1:13:56
Mike explained the lattice calculation you never
1:14:02
get anything that's infinite to find the coupling on the lattice you take it to zero not to Infinity
1:14:10
as you remove the cutoff and you know how to do that and uh
1:14:17
oil observables are calculable and you never have to
1:14:24
subtract Infinities or multiply by Infinity
1:14:29
so the conceptual problem with bugged people from the Iraq and
1:14:36
Eisenberg one of the beginnings of quantum field Theory through the 60s and seven of the existence of UV Infinities
1:14:43
kind of disappears
1:14:49
memory come to uh
1:14:55
no adjustable parameters the reason I read a beautiful article by
1:15:01
Feynman 1961 solve a conference gave a review of the present status of
1:15:09
quantum electronomics which was incredibly successful that a lot of
1:15:14
experimental measurements which he summarized in great depth was about 10 years after
1:15:20
you know the big to do and he he wanted he was dissatisfied he
1:15:27
wanted to see could Quantum electrodynamics really be a kind of perfect Theory
1:15:35
and so he said consider pure QED or QED has two parameters the mass of
1:15:42
the electron the points structure constant well let's put the mass to zero
1:15:47
could we calculate the mass could we calculate the fine structure constant people have been trying to calculate
1:15:54
Define structure constant wherever partly motivated by the fact
1:15:59
that its inverse is almost pure number
1:16:05
so consider pure QED with only zero Mass photons and electrons and protons
1:16:11
interacting with no other particles and having no cutoff
1:16:18
such a theory could not produce a finite electron mass now you might think that's because the theory is a chiral symmetry
1:16:26
but five minutes at that point made it clearer and remarked on it that he understood lambus recent work and chiral
1:16:34
symmetry could be broken you that's not an obstacle he said but the system is also invariant
1:16:42
to a change of scale conformal learner illness and there's no parameter to determine a
1:16:50
length and yet an electron with a mass involves such a letter
1:16:55
I'm not certain ly was always careful but it appears to be impossible to
1:17:01
generate a specific length from those scale whatsoever
1:17:08
but that's exact so he could have already concluded that QED somehow can't
1:17:15
be improved can't calculate the electron Mass can't calculate the fund structure constant
1:17:24
but as we know Quantum effects always break scaling Burns can not always but
1:17:32
can produce a physical Mass and then determine the coupling at this scale and that's exactly what UCD does
1:17:40
there are no essential adjustable parameters now of
1:17:47
course in the real world like in the case of QED there are other things the cork masses we understand have
1:17:55
nothing to do with PCD they have to do with the Higgs sector which
1:18:00
the number of colors who determines that
1:18:05
the number of Orcs
1:18:11
but yeah you do like Simon said throw away the quarks they're not essential
1:18:19
or keep the quarks Mass listed and uh then
1:18:25
because of dimensional transmutation which I summarize here the argument that
1:18:31
you're I hope know it uh all physical parameters
1:18:39
are in units of choose one the mass of the proton
1:18:47
calculable dimensionless numbers so qcd
1:18:53
is exactly the kind of thing 5 Min was dreaming of achieving a theory where
1:18:59
except for some scale which you need to measure masses Energies
1:19:07
everything is comfortable and that's true
1:19:12
true and your job is to figure out how to calculate at least in some rigorously
1:19:22
um systematic procedure
1:19:29
no adjustable parameter so for example that I always lay audiences explain that the mass of
1:19:38
the proton is really the confined NASA kinetic energy of the massless glons and
1:19:46
quarks that are rattling around in a confined region which sets the scale and
1:19:51
determines the mass and all mass ratios are calculable
1:19:59
and they're strong interaction of course defines that scale and is therefore
1:20:05
calculable as well now from a practical theoretical point
1:20:11
of view the most important feature the short term of qcd was that no new
1:20:19
physics at Short distances or high energies was necessary
1:20:24
and all theories we've had before knew that something was going to happen
1:20:29
at Short distances and that's what people expected but to the contrary asymptotic Freedom
1:20:36
means becomes simpler and simpler perturbation Theory becomes more and
1:20:41
more exact an immediate application of this
1:20:47
was that for a whole community of people so at that time was seriously sort of 10 years after CMB
1:20:56
tried to study early cosmology the early universe could be simple
1:21:04
also we had no problem extrapolating to to higher energies where the forces
1:21:10
could unify and finally a large number
1:21:18
so the implications of this
1:21:25
for the early Universe were really important because
1:21:30
if you imagine having to think about cosmology using nuclear physics oh my
1:21:36
God hadron Pals to Cork soup
1:21:41
pretty soon as understood that you've got a high enough densities in and temperatures
1:21:47
nuclear Quark protons had runs become settler they melt you have core grown
1:21:54
plasma we thought would be missed the cork glue on liquid that has
1:22:02
been discovered at Rickman but anyway that's all understandable perturbatively
1:22:09
more or less and so there was no obstacle
1:22:15
to extrapolating from CMB back to
1:22:21
as we do now through very very early times
1:22:27
their phase transitions along the way and this is another fascinating area of qcd which is
1:22:35
very different crowd than the people suited here but there are literally hundreds of theorists and experimenters
1:22:43
and experiments
1:22:48
and then of course the ability to to extrapolate to high Energies
1:22:54
uh LED very quickly after the standard
1:23:00
model was finalized to discovering that unification might very
1:23:06
well occur at extremely high energies these logarithms one very slowly
1:23:12
and that of course is the most important clue we have
1:23:18
to what happens near the plant grant them how the forces might unify together
1:23:24
with gravity and dominated speculative physics for the
1:23:30
last 40 years but also to some extent one of the very
1:23:35
large numbers that govern the structure of the universe that tell us why
1:23:40
why gravity is so weak at our scale of energies and why we are not black holes
1:23:46
is the Dirac large number problem one of his large numbers
1:23:52
which he said look nobody's ever going to calculate 10 to the minus 19. it's impossible
1:23:58
can't imagine a theory which could Calculate 10 to the minus 19.
1:24:04
and what he did was try to equative
1:24:10
invoked anthropic arguments because you know if this number would be 10 to the minus a thousand we would be
1:24:17
black holes right life couldn't exist right
1:24:23
gravity would be much stronger only a thousand nuclei would have
1:24:32
collapsed no black hole but the Iraq
1:24:37
like an asterox biography did he know about anthropic arguments
1:24:43
people were speculated using that those arguments already in the 19th century
1:24:49
instead he was better he was direct he uh he related this small number
1:24:57
two other small numbers the size of an atom compared to the size of the universe
1:25:03
some of them are time dependent so he said I can test this idea because then
1:25:10
some of the fundamental units that the Planck mass or so on would vary with time like the size
1:25:18
of the universe and that could be tested and has been tested and so far no
1:25:25
indication of because of a law cosmological variation of these fundamental constants
1:25:30
but qcd can calculate this number more or less
1:25:37
or at least you know from uh great qualitative point of view simply
1:25:44
it's the same picture always if at the unification scale which is
1:25:50
around the plank Mass the coupling is you know of order of our extrapolation of the
1:25:57
electromagnetic coupling and then you ask where does the proton
1:26:03
Mass arise from well it arises from the scale where the coupling becomes strong enough to confine these masses
1:26:10
corks and bronze that is given by the same kind of formula
1:26:15
and that from what we actually know is about 10
1:26:20
to the minus 19 19 plus or minus 2 which is good enough
1:26:27
so that we understand that large number
1:26:34
so it is kind of a perfect Theory it's a first example of a complete Theory
1:26:40
no adjustable parameters no indication of where it would break down
1:26:46
infinite bandwidth if you will but of course it's not the real world
1:26:54
luckily there are many questions we don't
1:26:59
understand and then of course we know there are other forces in nature the rest of the standard model and of
1:27:05
course gravity now I want to end with discussing
1:27:11
the other aspect of qcd which is remarkable and probably
1:27:16
a thousand years from now will be regarded as the most important thing
1:27:22
that we've learned which is the relation to string theory
1:27:27
which developed as a theory of restoring interactions at around the same time
1:27:34
motivated by experiment by the fact that Reggie trajectories spinning strings
1:27:40
were linear dualities between
1:27:45
one expressing physics in terms of particles in one channel and by crossing the other
1:27:53
channel etc etc so so much
1:27:59
and then of course nowadays by a theoretical experiments where we see
1:28:05
the fat strings that appear in lattice UCD and then of course by
1:28:14
um what we now have is in special cases
1:28:20
the beginnings of a precise Duality between our description of mesons as
1:28:28
either confining flux tubes or open strings in a fundamental string
1:28:35
theory and our understanding that uh gauge
1:28:42
Theory and string theory are not really different kinds of theories they're just different often different ways of
1:28:48
looking at the same phenomena or certainly part of the same conceptual framework
1:28:56
as was the understood early in pushing fundamental String Theory once
1:29:03
you have open strings mesons you have closed strings qcd you have blue balls
1:29:12
and that is the basis for a lot of the approaches you'll hear about in trying to
1:29:19
hopefully come up with a controllable
1:29:25
are analytic control of qcd
1:29:31
large nqcd is clearly an interesting limit in which
1:29:40
uh we understand that the theory must consist of
1:29:49
infinitely narrow stable blue balls I'm now ignoring the quarks
1:29:58
non-attractive theory of blue balls which is if you want the free field
1:30:04
limit of some Theory whose classical limit is
1:30:12
and goes to Infinity straight PCD 1 over n is kind of
1:30:19
the Quantum of action
1:30:25
might be a string theory might be something else but there is a classical limit which is the of something
1:30:33
looks a lot has to have an infinite number of glue balls and many other features which make sense
1:30:41
in string theory and it's probably a string theory although not the a string
1:30:47
theory we have yet constructed although much progress has been made towards guessing
1:30:54
what that theory might be in adscft of course gives us enormous guidance
1:31:02
the evidence of courses the structure of the perturbative
1:31:07
structure of qcd and Matrix theory in general one over n
1:31:13
one over one third phenomologically works very well much better than you might expect in
1:31:20
comparing prediction one of our own predictions of qcd with uh
1:31:26
with nature and of course the strongest argument currently is edsc FD
1:31:34
and you all know what that is so the Hope really is you know one hope
1:31:41
would be solve n equals four supersymmetric qcd that's a scale
1:31:47
invariant Theory it's almost solved
1:31:53
this perturbatively construct the dual string theory
1:32:01
well that's hard um
1:32:06
but not well that's hard
1:32:12
I'm running out of time okay that's not qcd it has super
1:32:18
symmetry which is not a future qcd um but you can easily break super Symmetry
1:32:25
by you know uh
1:32:30
pushing the masses of the extra particles for Infinity
1:32:36
but to form it then equals one or even real qcd in principle
1:32:41
you have to include quarks and interactions those can be treated
1:32:46
systematically in a 1 over NC expansion is a conceivable Direction
1:32:59
so let me just make a few remarks about the future
1:33:06
qcd has much more life than I ever expected the structures and of two-dimension of
1:33:16
perturbative diagnose Theory it's quite remarkable hints at something deep
1:33:23
but so far hasn't produced it but those calculational methods for
1:33:31
perturbative gauge theories are incredibly useful for experimenter and for theorists so that will continue
1:33:38
for sure numerical methods have reached a true level of maturity and uh they should be
1:33:47
available to people who are more interested in theoretical questions one of the purposes this collaboration is to
1:33:53
try to develop that connection because you now have a tool which has been improved by a factor of 10 to the 18 we
1:34:00
could take use of them make use of it better and of course there are new technologies
1:34:05
that will come along there are many many questions in qcd
1:34:11
that are great interest and Open Door experiments you can make predictions mostly having to do with time dependent
1:34:18
phenomena which so far a lot discussable by lattice cage Theory
1:34:24
oh and that experiment is still going and
1:34:30
although they're not discovering supersymmetry yet or new particles they are
1:34:36
measuring the properties of hadrons at LHC at
1:34:44
Rick at the electron ion collider which is a
1:34:50
colliding electron proton beam um in the next 10 you know over the next
1:34:57
decades all right see lhcb Alice the EIC the electronic equator there'll
1:35:05
be a lot of great experiments and you could be in the lucky position that my generation was in to actually in this
1:35:12
field make prediction and have them tested
1:35:19
it's a lot of pleasure coming from solving problems discovering new things in physics but believe me there's
1:35:25
nothing more satisfying than making predictions that experimenters put to
1:35:31
the test of nature and nature says so far it works
1:35:37
so far it worked never says yes it says maybe but with a smile
1:35:46
so I tried to summarize what have we learned fireman was once said you know
1:35:54
I love this in some imagine that today he would have said AI takes over
1:36:02
what statement would could we pass on to the Cockroaches or to the robots
1:36:09
that would contain the most information about physical world in the fewest words
1:36:15
and uh it's not an easy task one sentence all things are made of atoms little
1:36:22
particles that move around a perpetual motion attracting each other when they are a little distance apart but
1:36:28
repelling upon being squeezed into one another
1:36:34
I think I really I would like to see somebody do better
1:36:39
in one sentence no equation what have we learned from the standard
1:36:46
model well takes a whole slide matter is made out of
1:36:52
in one half fermions forces describe our Quantum gauge field three phases coulomb
1:37:00
screened or Higgs and a natural scalar fuel sector and
1:37:07
a confined strong phase with su3 color gay true
1:37:12
that's a one slide see if you can do better after 50 years what have we learned from
1:37:19
qcd well most important it is the theory of the
1:37:25
nuclear force Dynamics can determine all masses and
1:37:31
couples shouldn't be satisfied at this stage of any Theory it goes beyond
1:37:38
the well that even gener you know improves on the standard
1:37:45
models so all masses and couplings are calculable
1:37:50
but most importantly I think it's gate string duality
1:37:58
um the real hero is not a really engaged Theory page Theory
1:38:05
and it is the basic qcd and the rest of the standard model most of it
1:38:11
and of string theory or dual to it
1:38:16
and therefore of space-time and gravity that's the real hero of the story
1:38:23
but meanwhile I've come to the end
1:38:28
but not the end of the qcd
Institute for Advanced Study
144K subscribers
Videos
About
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
The Secret Sex Life of a Single Mom
The Secret Sex Life of a Single Mom
Free with ads
TV-MA
YouTube Movies & TV
188M subscribers
Subscribe
11K
Share
Save
Based on the book of the true life story of author Delaine Moore. Delaine Morris, mother of two, realizes she's completely lost herself after years of being in an emotionally abusive marriage with her husband Robert. On a mission to recover (and discover) her own identity, she meets "The Duke" who promises to teach her how to become an alpha female and embrace the woman she really wants to be. But there's one little catch... although she's learned how to get a guy and have the relationship she deserves, she can't seem to get one man out of her mind, "The Duke." Stars A …
Provider
A+E Networks
Rating
TV-MA
534 Comments
Add a comment...
@Individualliberties
5 months ago
this movie has a very powerful message -
"Life is real only then, when "I am"" - Gurdjieff
This woman, through various experiences, found herself, started to feel and think, and to really live her life.
She was asleep before that, just a functional robot.
Ones"you are", you can give yourself permission to get lost (surrender) and come back to yourself. She mastered it.
Such great movie to illustrate enlightenment in real life.
60
Reply
1 reply
@VATION3RD-GEN-X-GARAGE
6 months ago
The person that tells you an affair will make your marriage better is the person you're cheating with, not your spouse, In my case it was our marriage counselor while I was working he was at my home on Fridays supposedly counseling my wife on the side or should I say on her back instead😢
88
Reply
5 replies
@johnedmiston8427
4 months ago
Sexual intimacy should never be that complicated. It should be spontaneous, alluring, and comfortable. This is complicated, no one should need or want to be controlled.
43
Reply
@Levi-it2fh
6 months ago
Ladies don't trust anyone online like she did. Traveled alone to meet this freak. You don't ever know what kind of man you will meet. I actually felt scared for her.
229
Reply
7 replies
@eddiemanuel3946
6 months ago
She is incredibly beautiful and had a bad experience in her life but with time to heal she turned out to be happy and thats what matters.
68
Reply
2 replies
@03officiall23
3 months ago
“tall dark and handsome “ she describing a man i didn’t see lmao
22
Reply
@Tenamf
6 months ago
That Duke man is scary. Scary to me. I would’ve never ever went to his house.
Acting like he is king of the world or something nasty.
I am so happy that she got her life under control and she is beyond beautiful. She needs to make sure that she has her life under control.
The ending was good.
Thank you for posting this very different movie.
98
Reply
6 replies
@skipmartin3469
2 months ago
I forgot I ever watched this, and just started to make the same comment three months later. Too funny.
23
Reply
@derekemrie2987
6 months ago
Real love is hard work, neither person should always be a dom. or always be submissive (in the bedroom or elsewhere), it's about give and take, it is about sacrifice!
49
Reply
4 replies
@richardalvarez7748
6 months ago
It's a shame when they divorced that happen to my parents when I was ten I'm 63 yrs old you never get over it and her husband was a fool for not loving that beautiful woman she was perfect
63
Reply
@pauldudley3821
3 months ago
You definitely CANNOT tell that this was on TV and had commercials at one time....
15
Reply
3 replies
@NigroPimp
4 months ago
real love is for two people to be together for there whole life and only love each other with no cheating
32
Reply
4 replies
@samgabriel4006
6 months ago
A failed marriage emotionally and sexually will lead to disasters, and therefore the decision to marry is one of the most dangerous decisions that can be taken in life.
218
Reply
24 replies
@MichaelDobson-l1b
3 months ago
This "wife" was living a lie. Her marriage was based on an erroneous lifestyle, not love between
a husband and wife. Sad!
16
Reply
@oliviasuarez3608
6 months ago
Who in their right mind travels alone to meet a complete stranger ...???
😬😬😬😬😬😬
21
Reply
2 replies
@Spunday1
2 months ago
I clicked on this movie out of curiosity and it ended up being really good! Intriguing storyline and life lessons!
38
Reply
@YeOldeTowneCryer
6 months ago
The husband was too focused on the physical aspect. But if a wife is not offering herself to the husband he may eventually feel deprived and unloved. Too many women do not understand how important that is.
We were seeing how the husband related to her after at least seven years of marriage. We have no way of knowing if they were close and loving at first. The husband was very direct, not loving and compassionate in the way he spoke with her. Women need to feel loved and appreciated in order to be responsive to the husband. When you are a single mother sleeping around is a really bad choice. Too much danger of disease, or violence with pervs.
32
Reply
1 reply
@AzharHanna
2 months ago
Culture, morality, adherence to religion and moral, social and cultural values are what make married life continue with love and mutual respect between spouses and always praying to stay away from wrong and satanic thoughts
8
Reply
@JacobWilson-s3l
4 months ago
Very good movie. Teaches alot about subs and doms and kept it classy and respectful. Excellent story line. Thank you
19
Reply
@Freespirted2g
3 months ago (edited)
I was so invested from the the title, image and of course the depth of the script and story. WOW.
28
Reply
2 replies
@msnegron-lu6tw
4 months ago
A man who doesn't appreciate his wife will lose her and if the wife has true courage she will not only bounce back but she will find herself and forgive her ex husband and move forward.
22
Reply
1 reply
@judiechamblee9581
4 months ago
This is about female sexuality all done in her head where sex really starts....and there is a complicated issue of wanting men to dominate you without giving up who you really are... which is a very difficult thing to balance but you learn as you age ...it's great to accept the natural need of male dominance over female but it must be tempered by a man who knows how far to go which only comes with his age......life is a journey..it is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.....
13
Reply
1 reply
@Quanshi-Tianxia
11 days ago
I clicked on this movie out of curiosity and it ended up being really good! Intriguing storyline and life lessons!
出于好奇我点开了这部电影，结果真的很好！有趣的故事情节和人生教训！
1
Reply
@MikaComments
5 months ago
It doesn't matter how beautiful a woman is or how good-looking man is because after a while we get used to the looks & that's when other things come into play.
6
Reply
@louisbutler7209
6 months ago
Feeding these women a dream. The "alpha female." 😂
33
Reply
3 replies
@myunderstanding99
6 months ago
Once trust has been lost enough times, it becomes hard to trust again
39
Reply
@Visible-2U
5 months ago
Agree with his valid point of minute 14:40-17. Straight on point
17
Reply
1 reply
@BobBower-w9f
5 months ago
If a man loves, honors and cherishs his wife he won't have to go through this.
17
Reply
4 replies
@rogueryder3285
6 months ago
The husband's a jerk. He literally blamed her for his cheating
13
Reply
1 reply
@JackKorth
5 months ago
The damage this does to children is devastating women should think about this instead about their own selfish interests
29
Reply
3 replies
@juansebastianrestrepo8712
6 months ago
What garbage did I just watch? Don't waste your time with this movie! 🤮🤮🤮
14
Reply
@OleksandrFedichev-dn5es
1 month ago
A loved one and family are the foundations of happiness, everything else devastates and destroys.
2
Reply
1 reply
@danielschear556
6 months ago
The ONLY thing that kept me watching this lame movie was the incredible visual appeal of Ashley Jones.
12
Reply
@ELDEREDTUCKERJR
6 months ago
The main reason for growing apart, is the lack of communication, and honesty!
dwelling on what you think you want, when you already have it, is cheating on yourself!
7
Reply
@cookingwiththekings2987
6 months ago
Foolish the who made you take off your clothes the Duke is is your pimp he is setting you up for abig fall
11
Reply
1 reply
@Lovesongs7uMyUSA
2 months ago
It's a absolutely bad idea to pressure such innocent minds. Divorce should be done before you have a child. They have nothing to do with your relationship and satisfaction with each other. Hell !
5
Reply
@mahershakhtur4600
4 months ago
After reading so many comments and looking at the whole thing, was a risky move, with so much crime and tech is even harder to solve many...
The risks not always worth the lessons.
6
Reply
@syedmahmood7454
3 weeks ago
Every cheater will find a reason to cheat. If they get caught, they will justify it by playing victim. My so called wife(!) is a cheater too. Just don't say anything for the sake of my children. but she thinks I don't know anything.
8
Reply
2 replies
@Bistra-Bg
4 weeks ago
And...after divorce, she is not working with 2 kids...from where the money are coming? Only child support from her husband?
4
Reply
@LoveOfGold777
4 months ago (edited)
I’ll be honest,IRL, it will never be easy as her situation is. There would be too much bitterness, legal fights, family against you. Most people don’t heal quickly, and sleeping with other people will not make you grow. It is a nice fictional life a woman would like to go through. Most of these women will end up feeling used and alone. So, this movie is a fairy tale, especially if you’re a woman who earns basic pay rate. She meets a dom who actually pays for her things like a sugar daddy, who actually helps her succeed, the modern day Cinderella who seems to not always be there for her kids. I did enjoy the movie though.
2
Reply
@brunotamplenizza7602
5 months ago
I'm a older man! I, will judge this movie 🎥! It sounds very interesting! Just began watching!
5
Reply
@rubyredgrapefruit1454
2 weeks ago
I feel so sorry for her and her marriage. Asian husbands are still better than the husband in this movie. It is a shame.
1
Reply
@vincentbelljr.9903
6 months ago (edited)
Let the Lord Teach you Not an Evil Narcissist guy name Duke! It’s a Freak off
13
Reply
1 reply
@nwachukwujudepascal5876
1 month ago
Omg! It's 2.30 am here. I am still captivated by this true life story.. I am learning a lot from this movie . I am like Robert but not for the cheating aspect. I am a workaholic. I provide but don't have much bond with her . Omg!
1
Reply
@hadighazali308
1 month ago
And do not defend those who betray themselves, for God does not love the treacherous and sinful. They hide their evil deeds from people, but they cannot hide them from God. And whoever commits a mistake or sin and then repents and asks God for forgiveness, God will be Forgiving and Merciful after that.
2
Reply
@foxdotl
3 months ago
I thought it would be bad but I actually taught me a lot of things. 7.5/10
2
Reply
@NickolasFigler-fi3wj
2 weeks ago
Any woman falling for the Duke guy isn't too bright.
2
Reply
@JudithSanchez-j3k
6 months ago
I don’t like her husband he’s a cold sob 😭
7
Reply
1 reply
@danchavez8987
3 months ago (edited)
How shallow the room...This movie also brought a message...(NEVER the bondage, punishment...physical or mental abuse, nor adultery, etc.) But that EVERYONE is subservient...to others, be it within your employment, especially in marriage, and family, etc...and some people just cannot do that or that struggle being subservient to anyone...perhaps it takes practice like everything else...Try making that practice session with Jesus...
1
Reply
@jhonatanalvarez05
6 months ago
I took excellent care of many Baby Mommas throughout my life.. I call it great community service and well I got my rewards from it, including a heart break.. I broke my own rule.
12
Reply
@benc6503
6 months ago
I couldn't finish it or stand it anymore, but I'll attempt to be fair. Lot of dom/sub aspects, which at least to me personally is very bizarre and I don't find appealing at all.
The plot makes me think of the kind of smut you might expect in a romance novel you'd buy at a seedy gas station or at a dime store. I guess it's pr0n for women, pretty much?
The only real positive thing I got out of it is the danger posed by a marriage where the wife has no income and/or is otherwise dependent on her husband for support, and he's borderline or even outright abusive.
It's not clear what she does for money after initiating the divorce, or being able to find babysitting services on short notice, but I guess these are major details you're supposed to overlook.
If you're into this sort of thing, go ahead and watch it. But most folks aren't really gonna get much of anything out of it and will instead find it off-putting and even disgusting.
11
Reply
2 replies
@phraze410
1 day ago
Can you imagine the smell in that club? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 eewww lolol She totally fell off the face of the planet lol This movie is hilarious!!! I know her husband went low to cheat on her but she went to the sewer over it. Lol
Reply
@Cumogemot
5 months ago
Good job Hollywood, make more movies like this, to inspire women in your country, America.
6
Reply
@shantanuaphale3966
5 days ago
Keeping aside the online thing etc, conceptually it is a great movie. The society owes respect to every woman.
Reply
@richardperez5779
2 months ago
Domination isn't all about whips and chains. They are only tools of seduction. Submissives have the power in a D/S relationship... its also about trust...
2
Reply
@MikeMane-ex1vf
6 months ago
Ashley Jones is so natural. It happens when you play your own real life.
13
Reply
@Lurker_of_the_shadows
4 months ago
The themes of this film are horridly deplorable. "Empowerment through willing submission" is the most disgusting oxymoron I've ever heard of.
5
Reply
@safespot69
4 months ago
Why do they make these movies that degrade women? I think they are amazing!!
4
Reply
@remyhorizon
6 months ago
Stupid movie.
214
Reply
19 replies
@Vallance-cb5nh
5 months ago
It was her fault. That scene of her having xxx with her husband was sad. He should've had 2 other women on the side for recreational purposes only
4
Reply
@Bo-bo-i3t
6 months ago
The dom sub theorem sounds insane to me at first, but I was happy to see the ending. So maybe it is true. People may have the freedom to abandon their freedom in other aspects. Maybe a real submissive in that relationship won't lose all the control. By the way, does the Duke feel lonely sometimes?
4
Reply
@RobertF-q4r
6 months ago
On Line Dating can end in a musty shallow grave under some Perv's trailer home
20
Reply
2 replies
@kitkatkels86
8 days ago
This movie should be called, what women don’t want. 😂
Reply
@bratzdol
4 months ago
57:37 Yes, I did not listen either when friends and family warned me before I married my first (and only) wife.
2
Reply
@judiechamblee9581
4 months ago
Cherish this movie that is so well done..Dr. Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate would enjoy and understand the path this movie takes...sex starts within the brain and the brain is complicated..sex retreats into the brain..relationships are amazing good or bad we always learn and grow through them....
4
Reply
@Davidfranklin-88
3 months ago
Didn't even bother to watch the whole thing, just skipped to the good parts
14
Reply
4 replies
@alinik1244
1 month ago
She learned how to know herself and rely on herself.
1
Reply
@AAFP58-Grewal-USA
6 months ago
He slept with one and she slept with so many , wow , what's the message to the public ??
9
Reply
1 reply
@MRHALLOW13-r3r
5 months ago
I really appreciate , I really enjoyed the movie 🍿🎥 it good to watch anytime thanks ...
5
Reply
@alenafu1812
1 month ago
she doesn’t have to work because of the child support and alimony she got from her husband
Reply
@Phyllis-gf7oe
6 months ago
Tried to remove this garbage...wouldn't block....
3
Reply
@emeraldempiretarot
1 month ago
Cheesy, PG, nerdy stuff but good lessons for women going thru these types of things. I think the worst thing about the movie was the sucky songs throughout it lol
Reply
@keepingupwitheydie8245
6 months ago
Love this movie 😊thanks for sharing
12
Reply
@brandonmcewan7637
6 months ago
Your not supposed to "sleep" with your patience two wrongs don't make a right he wouldn't be looking for it if he was getting it at home
4
Reply
1 reply
@letushear7301
2 months ago
Satanic Movie actually. Well, the children seem to be basically oblivious to anything much. So that is a positive.
4
Reply
@LI-pm3mh
1 month ago
If every cliché was a movie
1
Reply
@pauldudley3821
3 months ago
Just to let everyone know.... I love sautéed mushrooms. (I figured my mushroom information would be more interesting than this movie was.)
2
Reply
@samgabriel4006
1 month ago
I am watching this wonderful movie for the second time because it raises and discusses a very important and serious issue, and my comment this time will be different from the first time: Ashley Jones is a beautiful and wonderful actress and she played her role with the utmost professionalism, in fact, the entire crew of the movie are wonderful, and the direction is excellent, as for the wife Delaine, from my point of view she is a beautiful, attractive and very sexual woman, and her ex-husband is an idiot because he did not know her true value that she deserves, does anyone agree with me on this opinion?
Reply
@gregfredrick283
6 months ago
Is this Lifetime movie?
12
Reply
2 replies
@Bubblebee670
5 months ago
What wrong with people? It’s just a movie. I get it, it’s stupid.! I give it Negative 3. People love to project what they’re going through through others. It’s crazy times we’re living in😅😂
1
Reply
@yaacovba
4 months ago
I was impressed that this did not turn into some feminist revelation video. I enjoyed it and I am very critical.
Reply
@JakeLamato-t8h4e
1 hour ago
Don't bow down to no one but to the one that allows you to breath
Reply
@astridcyanistescaeruleus4126
3 weeks ago
they warn you that there will be sex scenes, and there are none
Reply
@James-ki5ix
2 months ago
That's how it is in life but if anything you have to love yourself before you can deal with someone else, this movie seems like it's all about her getting laid because her marriage went to 💩
1
Reply
@leahthompson1583
1 day ago
So sorry lady but you should have told him to go to Hell as soon as his shit started
Reply
@Necoelsium
5 months ago
This was surprisingly a great movie, wow❤
4
Reply
1 reply
@ZandreBeau
5 months ago (edited)
One of my favorite dramas 👍🏼
3
Reply
2 replies
@GaryPetrusek
1 month ago
Beautiful What a Great looking Landing Strip. Love it !
1
Reply
@Ashley-g4t2o
4 months ago
Okay but why did he say "alpha male" so many times.
2
Reply
@aladynamedSusan
6 months ago
This movie is absolutely meaningLESS 😩😒
3
Reply
@mickgogle2125
4 months ago
show us the uncut version of the movie
5
Reply
1 reply
@zombeast23
6 days ago
👽
👽
👽
👽
Reply
@randyleonard4797
3 months ago
How can he have such a beautiful wife like ashley jones and cheat own her,...❤ she is gorgeous.
Reply
@albertcastillo719
5 days ago
Be carful woman with the predator man 😂😂😂
Reply
@laloshamm1557
3 months ago
AMAZING MESSAGE 😍🥰
2
Reply
@ricardokim544
5 months ago
Interesting movie.
11
Reply
@JudithSanchez-j3k
3 months ago
He treats her like servant to his disposition
Plus he’s rude
Cold Thurs her.
In this movies
Women always
Saids I promise you
1
Reply
@sugeyoviedo1551
6 months ago
I can relate to this movie 😮
7
Reply
@SuperAngelina5
6 months ago
Stupid movie 😢
11
Reply
@ebayerr
6 months ago
2014 tv movie
A divorced woman finds sexual liberation through online dating.
11
Reply
1 reply
@tomsheets6399
2 months ago
Looking at her, I'm getting a bit of a Diane Lane vibe, like in the movie Unfaithful
1
Reply
@amirrezaashkani8418
5 months ago
a super fucking story
6
Reply
@JoyceBrown-p7m
2 months ago
I am not interested in the cesspool pool you are offering ‼️
1
Reply
@sanyavanya8521
11 days ago
No sex for husband, but anyone outside is welcome ))))
1
Reply
@MasterSutka
1 month ago
This movie was actually good 😂 haha and the duke was a good man ✅
Reply
1 reply
@MegaCloud05
1 month ago (edited)
This feels like a Lifetime movie. Also the actress is very very beautiful
Reply
@aimeedoyle2448
5 months ago
Are you kidding me?
WHAAAAAAAAA???
NO FREAKING WAY!
2
Reply
@askyomama69
6 months ago
This lady seriously expected she’s the only one for that doctor? He practice his kung-fu 5 days week, Jesus Christ c’mon woman 🤦🏿♂️
10
Reply
@zombeast23
6 days ago
🤖
🤖
🤖
🤖
Reply
@andesiku
5 months ago
WHAT THIS SUCKS
10
Reply
@kitkatkels86
8 days ago
1:04:58 serial unaliver vibes 😂
Reply
@iPACnVEGAS
2 weeks ago
LUV This 🎉🎉🎉
Reply
@Lily_of_the_Forest
3 months ago
Cheating is evil!
3
Reply
@thedumbpotato6952
5 months ago
Is no one going to talk about the problems those kids are gonna have
1
Reply
1 reply
@robertstates6538
1 month ago
I used to do this when they let me in to use the bathroom or phone, it started when I was 19 and uh-oh, I better shuts up
1
Reply
@NigroPimp
4 months ago
she should have left him
1
Reply
@heatherharris7587
1 month ago
Her husband is a narcissist. Not surprised what happened.
1
Reply
@beckycarreiro2369
5 months ago
THATS WHAT YOU GET TO YOUR HUSBAND... YOUR JUST FOLLOWING YOUR LUST GIRL...DUKE IS AN EVIL MAN NO WAYYYYY
4
Reply
@Lifeherelive
4 hours ago
watched this movie to make fun of it, but it shut me up and I was really into it
Reply
@FayeGray-fo1rc
4 months ago
I don't want to stay the obvious here but how and what who makes the movie like this boo
3
Reply
1 reply
@aideespinosa1322
3 months ago (edited)
16:19😅
5
Reply
@nishantpandya1279
6 months ago
Guys can be messed up
3
Reply
@Khaled-g8q
3 months ago (edited)
Omg this movie makes you cheating without feeling you r not guilty
2
Reply
1 reply
@PhilT-x8t
5 months ago
Few years ago, I travel from Stockton California to Louisiana my left or right arm and soda will numb and very aching and cannot move or put in a sort of take our shirt. I feel that I have a stroke or half of my body paralyzed that is aching relative in Louisiana advise me to go to the acupuncture. The Vietnamese American acupuncture used needle to to work on my feet. Momentary my shoulder arm upper body feel better.
Reply
1 reply
@dumdems
2 weeks ago
Adultery not an affair
Reply
@davehammock5256
4 months ago
Very interesting movie.
3
Reply
@INFIMUNDI
2 months ago
😊😊😊😊😊❤😊😊😊😊😊
Reply
@jhiejhiemorera5036
6 months ago
Great movie ❤
5
Reply
@Topper-ye1er
6 months ago
10:50
13
Reply
@CookingWithKiah
3 weeks ago
50:29
1
Reply
@HungBach-b4y
2 weeks ago
Sex life and the single mother 2:41
Reply
@brandyw.7943
5 months ago
Ashley Jones as a single Mom
Reply
@EdianKash
4 months ago
The Shane thing is totally insane 🤨
1
Reply
@seth03131989
3 months ago
1:12:45 .... Dude made it to where no one would disobey lol
Reply
@JudithSanchez-j3k
6 months ago
This not stupid movie I take it as
Learning way for us women to know what we want and never to let a men to
Disrespect us
And take advantage to us
Because we are
Women
1
Reply
1 reply
@JenniferShultz-BeastlyBeautiez
5 months ago
This was a really great movie
6
Reply
@KimBackus-h3b
2 months ago
The duke is sick
2
Reply
@sanyavanya8521
11 days ago
All doctors doing all this women, cause women big time into doctors )))) Honestly, this movie just ecouraging women to slip around ))) Adios family, guys don't get married - just hit it and quit it ))))
1
Reply
@dumdems
2 weeks ago
This woman is ridiculously lost
Reply
@Shebeethin
6 months ago
Charly Kirk clearly got owned. It took only 1 question to make him loose his sh"t.
2
Reply
@SusanNevells
8 days ago
I think she better off get a divorce
Reply
@imeldawong9697
6 months ago
Be careful ppl lie all the time. Don’t trust nobody.
2
Reply
@JudithSanchez-j3k
3 months ago
He treats her like servant to his disposition
Plus he’s rude
Cold Thurs her.
Reply
@mohamadgh-ry1hp
3 months ago
❤❤❤
1
Reply
@alenafu1812
1 month ago
有钱人的游戏- a sick man
Reply
@LilJaygames188
3 months ago (edited)
Is the movie good??
3
Reply
1 reply
@brilliant-f8878
1 month ago
This is the same dirty Western and American culture that always shows illicit relationships. Where have you all gone? All this vulgarity.
1
Reply
@emet6306
1 month ago
Yeah this is BS two wrongs don't make a right and the kids always pay the price
1
Reply
@SonicEXEProductions
6 months ago
Trash movie
7
Reply
@ricardokim544
5 months ago
Great acting.
6
Reply
@03officiall23
3 months ago
stupid ass movie
1
Reply
@MrGazzara
6 months ago
What bothered me is, she needed to go to a man to learn how to enjoy sex. I think it's demeaning to women. They need to learn about sex from a man? Whatever they like I guess is what matters.
7
Reply
5 replies
@hussainbhai2693
2 weeks ago
🎉😮🎉
Reply
@Saaedsharif
2 months ago
🎉🎉🎉
1
Reply
@fido139
10 days ago
🙄
Reply
@mdalmasum-t6w
3 months ago
😃😃😃😃😃😃😃
Reply
@HungBach-b4y
2 weeks ago
Cynthia Preston.
Reply
@heatherratliff1813
3 weeks ago
It's Bridget from bold and the beautiful
1
Reply
@ChrisroseValcin-e8p
1 month ago
Good
3
Reply
@allgrapes4352
6 months ago
If they’ll do it with you they will do it to you. Next…
3
Reply
@Mushroomy123
3 weeks ago
Hmmm is that u idk
1
Reply
@ankushbhandari3055
5 months ago
What a delusional movie
2
Reply
@NickolasFigler-fi3wj
2 weeks ago
Sick sick sick.
Reply
@TonyPoindexter-h6o
1 month ago
Loveyoumomomomtony
Reply
@TamTran-zp1xb
5 months ago
It’s is a fantasy movie
2
Reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
good idea you don't need breast implants
Reply
@AbbasBasefat
1 month ago
فیلم خیلی آموزنده ای هست خیلی مسایل رو از این فیلم آموختم بااینکه خارجیه ولی همه جا مسایل بین زوجها شبیه همند
2
Reply
@Exit_343
1 month ago
Gonna need timestamps men of culture. Thanks in advance.
Reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
don't do it
Reply
@RonaldJohnson-l7c
6 months ago
You know, this is a stupid movie.
3
Reply
@Kenny-c2o
1 day ago
What a crock of BS!
Reply
@albertsuniga7301
4 months ago
🤣
Reply
@CounterIntelligence-em7vy
3 months ago
Definitely a meaning here.
1
Reply
@mikenewman-u3n
4 months ago
Thank you very good 👍
1
Reply
@shalenaporter18
1 month ago
WOW throwback movie 🍿 hour hour
Reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
LOL
Reply
@christinekuehn1774
3 months ago
Duke looks like Mr.Roper from Three's Company 😂
Reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
Choose the needles acupunkture is legit
Reply
@olumideilesanmi8292
5 months ago
All women are the same
5
Reply
@kareenswaby9286
6 months ago
Is that gentleman R Kelly with the little girls
3
Reply
@حسنقدسی-خ9ط
3 months ago
Ok👌
1
Reply
@denisewoods849
3 months ago
If you want to kill an hour watch it otherwise path kind of stupid😂
Reply
@dragondescendant1
5 months ago
Acupuncture by a non Chinese man, are you kidding? Sure doesn't work.
4
Reply
@prettyprincess28
3 days ago
I got the book but haven’t read it yet
Reply
@Private02-d5i
6 months ago
👎👎👎👎👎
2
Reply
@kejiwani7110
3 days ago
Make easy to go to the place
Reply
@bakhodiryarashov7222
6 months ago
🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
1
Reply
@clarencehammer3556
5 months ago
Very sad.
Reply
@12440jayjay
2 months ago
As the movie progress, I found it more like acting without involvement. Could not engaged with any of the feelings. had to stop watching.
Reply
@gaki6913
2 months ago
capt. Haldane
Reply
@charitystiger8627
3 weeks ago
l know it booyah
Reply
@ScottMcLellan-w1l
3 months ago
Yes it does want we won't need ❤
Reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
I agree
Reply
@imeldawong9697
6 months ago
Now you learn your lesson.
1
Reply
@robearle3976
6 months ago
Let’s ALWAYS see much more “T & A”………..
3
Reply
@jamiexxx5292
2 months ago
That's big BS !!!!!!!!!face-red-droopy-eyes
1
Reply
@annette3699
5 months ago
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz BORING!!!
2
Reply
@zombeast23
6 days ago
👽
👽
👽
👽
Reply
@zombeast23
6 days ago
🤖
🤖
🤖
🤖
Reply
@kitty-vk8ic
5 months ago
Stupid movie.
2
Reply
@Hardy703
6 months ago
Janda
1
Reply
@ruthstewart9155
3 weeks ago
Good movie
Reply
@dfletcher7803
5 months ago
🤔!
1
Reply
@skipmartin3469
6 months ago
A sweet little fantasy.
1
Reply
@TimmyStowers
13 days ago
You are great and I hope you let us have a bunch of fun with each other and your family will be able if you want but you and me wood be better i l y
1
Reply
@The_Whitexican1.0
4 months ago
Worthless movie
1
Reply
@BroloxSkr
5 months ago
58:36 they going full crazy🔥
Reply
1 reply
@Presidentofkashmir
3 months ago
Poor wall st broker representation
Reply
@enero1191
2 weeks ago
L
Reply
@SamuelB-w6n
1 month ago
Don't go gay that the f up stuff
Reply
@Jesse_Jessie_James
5 months ago
When my dad divorced my mom i was happy. Cause i was going to live with him. And my mom was like hell yeah. But she was not happy when cop's arrested her for failure to pay child support. And all the money she had on her went to my dad. And me and my best friend's broke into her house. And we took stuff that was my dad's and also other thing's that we could sell at pawnshop's. And we trashed the whole inside of the house. She ended up having to stay in jail when her landlord pressed charge's against her for damaged done to her apartment :) And she was sent to prison for a very long time. And she was killed in prison. She did give birth to a set of twin's a boy and a girl who is not my father's kid's. And she stated it was a accident having them. And they was not happy hearing about what really happened to there mom. And they wanted to connect with me and i said hell no we ain't related. Andi said u was a accident when my mom got drunk and spread her leg's open. To this day they don't know who there father actually is since she did that at a bar.
Reply
1 reply
@ParvizGilani
5 months ago
❤❤❤❤😂🎉🎉
Reply
@NN-oz6rr
3 months ago
Terrible propaganda film
1
Reply
@syedrahsan123
6 months ago
Super Movi
2
Reply
@davidbetteridge5956
5 months ago
Amen
Reply
@JudithSanchez-j3k
6 months ago
I like the movie ❤❤
1
Reply
@raphaelsafiev9450
4 months ago
👌❤️
Reply
@catholiccrusader5328
1 month ago
I really enjoyed this rather odd movie.hand-pink-waving
Reply
@magaboyz4028
5 months ago
Belongs to the streets
1
Reply
@03officiall23
3 months ago
corny ahh movie
1
Reply
@مهردادنژادمهدی-ض3ك
5 months ago
زنی که حتی یکبارهم خیانت نکندازنظرمن فاسداست هرگونه دلیلی هم داشته باشدمهم نیست
Reply
@kattloxo8089
3 months ago
superficial
Reply
@benashworth687
6 months ago
her nose is perfect, ya think its real?
2
Reply
3 replies
@TheKangaroo2088
3 months ago
It is just a a show. Nothing to do with real world.
Reply
1 reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
go sleep with someon e else
Reply
@lesleycassaniti2337
1 month ago
this does not look good
Reply
@GOAT-g7y-n9f
6 months ago
I hate movie
2
Reply
@JamesWeigel-t5o
3 months ago
Do you think
Reply
@jenny-DD
6 months ago
Nice movie
Cool, how is it a glimpse into Elon Musk
Since it's his sister
2
Reply
@flolacandola9396
6 months ago
Great movie, reverse psychology. Watch, glean and see what you can learn.
Reply
@mickbond2895
6 months ago
б
bull crap movie.Waste of time
2
Reply
@iracemaantonio1233
4 months ago
I love it ,is the best movie I have wached
Reply
@feyazkhalilov6780
6 months ago
👎
1
Reply
@oudonerudolph7507
3 months ago
That is very good movie I enjoyed watching this movie
Reply
@JerryMoon-y1l
4 months ago
Women does stretch and back to same
Reply
@pochefamvlog
4 months ago (edited)
Sleeping with make up it doesn't make sense lol
Reply
@RobertoAlmanza-t2b
2 months ago
O that is nice sss
Reply
@bellax0o609
3 months ago
Actually a great movie. & I love the main actress, just don’t remember her name.
Reply
@iykeaballa2662
4 months ago
Living in fantasy 😢😢😢 learn to pay the price of life.....life is more about rules, not right nor freedom 😅😅😅u endless search for happiness is only begone if u don't know Jesus n his rules. Jesus is the way,the truth n life. No Jesus, No life😂😂❤❤❤ ❤❤🎉🎉
1
Reply
@melbengonzales8117
6 months ago
That's kie even after a few months it taste like shit
Reply
@HiwaHidar-v6p
6 months ago
انا زوجي حلال انت زوجي،حرام
Reply
@Jesse_Jessie_James
6 months ago
Hmm i figured it would be what my husband Jesse had to live like. His mom was nothing but a WHOR& she thought she could not get pregnant after she had him. Ha ha wrong 5 month's later she realized she is pregnant and she was shocked. She could not get an abortion since it was over a certain period. And she had no idea who his father is since she slept with guy's all the time. Jesse was already living with his Aunt Maggie at the time. And when his mom died the state sent the baby off to be adopted. Since it was not Jesse's dad's baby. Since his mom slept with allot of guy's. The baby was adopted several time's until it was sent to a living center due to issues has a minor. And the kid arrived at our location and asked for Jesse. And Jesse said u are not my brother u are an accident since my P-O-A-S mother thought she could not get pregnant. And i said u are not my dad's son. And DNA test proved we was not brother's. And he said will we have the same mom. And word's was exchange and let's just say the Police Department had fun scrapping him off the side of the street. Don't mess with somebody who know's UFC and MMA. we never heard from him again since he's in prison for life.
2
Reply
2 replies
@maryloucragg7478
2 months ago
Good movie and different.
Reply
@The_Whitexican1.0
4 months ago
Brain washing movie
Reply
@frankyhonnolus5528
6 months ago
sub and dom lol😂
1
Reply
@teresacastillo1783
6 months ago
CIAvideos exlosing american women like questioning them
Reply
1 reply
@HamedYari
6 months ago
Top mom
Reply
@mrpablitoz6083
2 months ago
Woke movie 😂😂😂😂😂
Reply
@mrpablitoz6083
2 months ago
Liberal movie
Reply
@spudsmarauder
6 months ago
Interesting
1
Reply
@wkdewok
5 months ago
Purple hair wombat with a son with strange pronoun. Holding out till 2028...
Reply
@JessicaGoss-vb4sr
4 months ago
I've never seen this movie is it good??
Reply
2 replies
@javadhosini2026
6 months ago
دردین مسیحیت ازدواج مقدس چه معنی دارد
Reply
@bjarias
5 months ago
... attractive actors... dumb-plot-premise.... actually tame-boring, for today's-MA-audiences
Reply
@Stephanie-b3q7t
6 months ago
Is that me?
Reply
1 reply
@bobbystanley8580
1 day ago
This was a really good movie
Reply
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)